Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 315-326.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.02.011

• HORTICULTURE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Different SlU6 Promoters Cloning and Establishment of CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Gene Editing System in Tomato

PU Yan, LIU Chao, LI Ji-Yang, AERZU GULI·TaShi, HU Yan, LIU XiaoDong   

  1. College of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University/Laboratory of Agricultural Biotechnology of Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052
  • Received:2017-06-21 Online:2018-01-16 Published:2018-01-16

Abstract: 【Objective】U6 promoter is a vital element for the transcription of sgRNA in the CRISPR/Cas9 system. It is necessary to clone some endogenous U6 promoters with high transcription activity and construct CRISPR/Cas9 vector, which could provide a strong technical basis for functional genomics and molecular breeding in tomato. 【Method】 Four different tomato U6 promoters were cloned by first round of PCR amplification from tomato cultivar Zhongshu 4. Each U6 promoter with two different length was truncated and used to construct plant expression vector carried SlU6 promoter::GUS, respectively. The Eight GUS fusion expression vectors were transformed into tomato leaves by agroinfiltration. According to the degree of GUS staining, the promoter with high transcription activity was selected to construct the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing vector with target sequence from powdery mildew-related gene MLO1 and EDR1. These gene editing vectors were transformed into tomato protoplast by PEG method. The mutation of endogenous target genes in each transformed tomato protoplast was analyzed by a restriction enzyme PCR (RE-PCR) assay. Finally, the types of endogenous gene mutation were analyzed by sequencing. The efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system based on tomato endogenous U6 promoter was verified by the frequency distribution map of mutant loci. 【Result】4 kinds and 8 different lengths of tomato U6 promoters were obtained by two rounds of PCR. Their length was 452, 202, 448, 206, 433, 190, 448 and 218 bp, respectively. After sequences analysis, results showed that the four tomato U6 promoters also contained the USE motif and TATA box which were found in Arabidopsis U6 promoters. The construction of GUS fusion expression vectors driven by corresponding truncated tomato U6 promoters were done and transformed into tomato leaves. The GUS histochemical staining showed that the transformed tomato leaves were dyed blue, which indicated that all 8 SlU6 promoters have transcription activity.The SlU6-2P4 promoter was chose to drive sgRNA transcription and construct the CRISPR/Cas9 system with target sequence from MLO1 and EDR1 respectively. The result showed that endogenous SlU6-2P4 promoter could drive sgRNA transcription and gene MLO1 was edited successfully in tomato. Sequence analysis revealed that all types of gene mutations are base substitution and the hotspot of mutation only exists in the target region of endogenous gene. 【Conclusion】4 kinds of SlU6 promoters with high transcription efficiency were obtained from tomato. The established CRISPR/Cas9 system based on SlU6-2 promoter could successfully achieve the editing of endogenous genes in tomato.

Key words: CRISPR/Cas9, SlU6 promoter, clone, tomato, gene editing

[1]    Sato S, Tabata S, Hirakawa H, Asamizu E, Shirasawa K, Isobe S, Kaneko T, Egholm M. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature, 2012, 485(7400): 635-641.
[2]    Hisamatsu S, Sakaue M, Takizawa A, Kato T, Kamoshita M, Ito J, Kashiwazaki N. Knockout of targeted gene in porcine somatic cells using zinc-finger nuclease. Animal Science Journal, 2015, 86(2): 132-137.
[3]    Sun N, Zhao H. Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs): A highly efficient and versatile tool for genome editing. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2013, 110(7): 1811-1821.
[4]    Chen K, Gao C. Targeted genome modification technologies and their applications in crop improvements. Plant Cell Reports, 2014, 33(4): 575-583.
[5]    Chen X, Lu X, Shu N, Wang S, Wang J, Wang D, Guo L, Ye W. Targeted mutagenesis in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 44304.
[6]    Li C, Unver T, Zhang B. A high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted mutagenesis In Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 43902.
[7]    Liu X, Xie C, Si H, Yang J. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in plants. Methods,2017, 3: 9.
[8]    Friedland A E, Tzur Y B, Esvelt K M, Colaiácovo M P, Church G M, Calarco J A. Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nature Methods, 2013, 10(8): 741-743.
[9]    Wang M B, Helliwell C A, Wu L M, Waterhouse P M, Peacock W J, Dennis E S. Hairpin RNAs derived from   RNA polymerase II and polymerase III promoter-directed transgenes are processed differently in plants. RNA Biology, 2008, 14(5): 903-913.
[10]   Domitrovich A M, Kunkel G R. Multiple, dispersed human U6 small nuclear RNA genes with varied transcriptional efficiencies. Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, 31(9): 2344-2352.
[11]   Jia H, Wang N. Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. Public Library of Science One, 2014, 9(4): e93806.
[12]   雷建峰, 伍娟, 陈晓俊, 於添平, 倪志勇, 李月, 张巨松, 刘晓东. 棉花花粉中高效转录U6启动子的克隆及功能分析. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(19): 3794-3802.
Lei J F, Wu J, Chen X J, Yu T P, Ni Z Y, Li Y, Zhang J S, Liu X D. Cloning and functional analysis of cotton U6 promoter with high transcription activity in cotton pollen. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(19):3794-3802. (in Chinese)
[13]   Simmen K A, Mattaj I W. Complex requirements for RNA polymerase III transcription of the Xenopus U6 promoter. Nucleic Acids Research, 1990, 18(19): 5649-5657.
[14]   刘玟杉. 基于CRISPR/Cas9的拟南芥多基因编辑及其在基因功能研究中的应用[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2015.
Liu W S. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and the application in gene functions study [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[15]   Xing H L, Dong L, Wang Z P, Zhang H Y, Han C Y, Liu B, Wang X C, Chen Q J. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. Plant Biology, 2014, 14(1): 327.
[16]   Li J F, Norville J E, Aach J, McCormack M, Zhang D, Bush J, Church G M, Sheen J. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31(8): 688-691.
[17]   Erijman A, Shifman J M, Peleg Y. A single-tube assembly of DNA using the transfer-PCR (TPCR) platform. DNA Cloning and Assembly Methods, 2014, 1116: 89-101.
[18]   Yoo S D, Cho Y H, Sheen J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nature protocols, 2007, 2(7): 1565-1572.
[19]   Lu Y M, Chen X, Wu Y X, Wang Y P, He Y Q, Wu Y. Directly transforming PCR-amplified DNA fragments into plant cells is a versatile system that facilitates the transient expression assay. Public Library of Science One, 2013, 8(2): e57171.
[20]   Janga M R, Campbell L M, Rathore K S. CRISPR/Cas9- mediated targeted mutagenesis in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Molecular Biology, 2017, 94: 349-360.
[21]   Liang Z, Zhang K, Chen K, Gao C. Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2014, 41(2): 63-68.
[22]   Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, Gao C. Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system. Nature Protocols, 2014, 9(10): 2395-2410.
[23]   Jiang W, Zhou H, Bi H, Fromm M, Yang B. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis,tobacco,sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, 41(20): e188.
[24]   Jacobs T B,LaFayette P R,Schmitz R J,Parrott W A. Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. Bio Med Central Biotechnology, 2015, 15(1): 16.
[25]   Cao H X, Wang W, Le H T T, Vu G T H. The Power of CRISPR-Cas9-Induced Genome Editing to Speed Up Plant Breeding. International Journal of Genomics, 2016.
[26]   Cong L, Ran F A, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habi b, Zhang F. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 819-823.
[27]   Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt K M, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo J E, Church G M. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 823-826.
[28]   Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov V. Plant genome editing made easy: Targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods, 2013, 9(1): 39.
[29]   Jacobs T B, LaFayette P R, Schmitz R J, Parrott W A. Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. Bio Med Central Biotechnology, 2015, 15(1): 16.
[30]   Brooks C, Nekrasov V, Lippman Z B, Van Eck J. Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated9 System . Plant Physiology, 2014, 166(3): 1292-1297.
[31]   Zhang Z, Mao Y, Ha S, Liu W, Botella J R, Zhu J K. A multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 platform for fast and efficient editing of multiple genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Report, 2016, 35(7): 1519-1533.
[32] Zhou H, Liu B, Weeks D P, Spalding M H, Yang B. Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice. Nucleic Acids Research, 2014, 42(17): 10903.
[33]   Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(39): 2579-2586.
[34]   雷建峰, 李月, 徐新霞, 阿尔祖古丽·塔什, 蒲艳, 张巨松, 刘晓东. 棉花不同GbU6启动子截短克隆及功能鉴定. 作物学报, 2016, 42(5): 675-683.
Lei J F, Li Y, Xu X X, Tashi A, Pu Y, Zhang J S, Liu X D. Cloning and functional analysis of different truncated GbU6 promoters in cotton. Acta Agronomica Sinica,2016, 42(5): 675-683.(in Chinese)
[35]   Belhaj K, Chaparro-Garcia A, Kamoun S, Nekrasov  V. Plant genome editing made easy: Targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods, 2013, 9(1): 39.
[36]   Farboud B, Meyer B J. Dramatic enhancement of genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9 through improved guide RNA design. Genetics, 2015, 199(4): 959-971.
[1] SHAO ShuJun,HU ZhangJian,SHI Kai. The Role and Mechanism of Linoleyl Ethanolamide in Plant Resistance Against Botrytis cinerea in Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1781-1789.
[2] WANG MengRui, LIU ShuMei, HOU LiXia, WANG ShiHui, LÜ HongJun, SU XiaoMei. Development of Artificial Inoculation Methodology for Evaluation of Resistance to Fusarium Crown and Root Rot and Screening of Resistance Sources in Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 707-718.
[3] JIANG QiQi,XU JianJian,SU Yue,ZHANG Qi,CAO Peng,SONG ChenHu,LI ZhongAn,SONG Zhen. Construction and Application of Infectious Clone of Citrus Yellow Mosaic Virus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4840-4850.
[4] HU XueHua,LIU NingNing,TAO HuiMin,PENG KeJia,XIA Xiaojian,HU WenHai. Effects of Chilling on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Characteristics of Leaves with Different Leaf Ages in Tomato Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4969-4980.
[5] LIU Hao,PANG Jie,LI HuanHuan,QIANG XiaoMan,ZHANG YingYing,SONG JiaWen. Effects of Foliar-Spraying Selenium Coupled with Soil Moisture on the Yield and Quality of Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4433-4444.
[6] CUI QingQing, MENG XianMin, DUAN YunDan, ZHUANG TuanJie, DONG ChunJuan, GAO LiHong, SHANG QingMao. Inhibiting Eeffect of Root-Cutting and Top-Pinching on Graft Healing of Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 365-377.
[7] LI YiMei,WANG Jiao,WANG Ping,SHI Kai. Function of Sugar Transport Protein SlSTP2 in Tomato Defense Against Bacterial Leaf Spot [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3144-3154.
[8] FANG HanMo,HU ZhangJian,MA QiaoMei,DING ShuTing,WANG Ping,WANG AnRan,SHI Kai. Function of SlβCA3 in Plant Defense Against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2740-2751.
[9] LI ZhengGang,TANG YaFei,SHE XiaoMan,YU Lin,LAN GuoBing,HE ZiFu. Molecular Characteristics and Pathogenicity Analysis of Youcai Mosaic Virus Guangdong Isolate Infecting Radish [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2752-2761.
[10] GUO FengHui,DING Yong,JI Lei,LI XianSong,LI XiLiang,HOU XiangYang. The Response of Leymus chinensis Cloned Offspring to Mowing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2257-2264.
[11] LI JianXin,WANG WenPing,HU ZhangJian,SHI Kai. Effects of Simulated Acid Rain Conditions on Plant Photosynthesis and Disease Susceptibility in Tomato and Its Alleviation of Brassinosteroid [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1728-1738.
[12] JiaQi WANG,YuHong DONG,JuLing JIANG,JianNing QIAN,WenTao WEI,GuoLiang SONG,JinBo JIAO,XinXin GUAN,GuoBiao JI,YeXin ZHANG. Based on PK15 Cell Line for PCV2 Fully Suspension Culture Process [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1280-1287.
[13] XianMin MENG,YanHai JI,WangWang SUN,ZhanHui WU,ZhaoSheng CHU,MingChi LIU. Response of Chloroplast Ultrastructure and Photosynthetic Physiology of Two Tomato Varieties to Low Light Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(5): 1017-1028.
[14] YANG Min,XU HuaWei,WANG CuiLing,YANG Hu,WEI YueRong. Using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Targeted Mutagenesis of ZmFKF1 Delayed Flowering Time in Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 696-707.
[15] WANG Ping,ZHENG ChenFei,WANG Jiao,HU ZhangJian,SHAO ShuJun,SHI Kai. The Role and Mechanism of Tomato SlNAC29 Transcription Factor in Regulating Plant Senescence [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(24): 5266-5276.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!