Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (13): 2612-2621.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.13.017

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Hindgut Enzyme on the Enzyme Hydrolysate Gross Energy of Feedstuffs and Correlation Between Non-Starch Polysaccharides and in vitro Energy Digestibility

GAO Li-xiang, CHEN Liang, HUANG Qing-hua, ZHONG Ru-qing, ZHANG Li-lan, ZHANG Hong-fu   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193
  • Received:2016-01-26 Online:2016-07-01 Published:2016-07-01

Abstract: 【Objective】The effects of different simulated hindgut enzymes on the in vitro dry matter digestibility (DMD) and enzyme hydrolysate gross energy (EHGE) of feedstuffs were determined using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system (SDS), and the correlation between non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) content and in vitro gross energy digestibility (GED) of feed ingredients were also analyzed to provide reference for in vitro method to simulate digestion in the stomach, small intestine and large intestine. 【Method】After the simulated digestion in the stomach and small intestine of 6 feed ingredients, 4 groups including 3 simulated hindgut enzymes (cellulase, Viscozyme and bionic enzyme) and the control with deionized water were used to stimulate the hindgut digestion with a SDS. Bionic enzymes included cellulase, xylase, β-glucanase and pectinase. Each treatment contained 5 replicates with 1 digestion tube per replicate, the DMD, GED and EHGE of corn, soybean meal, wheat bran, corn DDGS, alfalfa and soybean hull were determined. The NSP contents of these feed ingredients were measured using a gas-liquid chromatography with aiditol acetates derivatives and were also related with DMD and GED. 【Result】 The DMD (81.51 %) and EHGE (15.39 MJ·kg-1) of corn were the highest in all ingredients, whereas the DMD (10.60 % ) and EHGE (2.42 MJ·kg-1) of soybean hull were the lowest in the 6 feedstuffs. The DMD of corn, soybean meal and soybean hull and the EHGE of soybean meal and soybean hull were greater in the 3 simulated hindgut enzymes than in the control group (P<0.01). The DMD and EHGE of alfalfa and DDGS were not affected by the inclusion of cellulase and the DMD and EHGE of wheat bran and DDGS were also not affected by the inclusion of Viscozyme (P>0.05). The DMD of 6 feedstuffs and the EHGE of 6 feedstuffs with the exception of DDGS were increased with the bionic enzyme to simulate digestion in the hindgut (P<0.01). The promotion degree of simulated hindgut enzymes on the DMD and EHGE were varied with feedstuffs. In the cellulase group, the increased DMD and EHGE were greatest in the wheat bran by 5.89% and 1.03 MJ·kg-1, whereas were the lowest in the soybean meal by 1.26% and 0.36 MJ·kg-1, respectively. The increasing DMD and EHGE in the Viscozyme group were the greatest in the soybean hull by 6.01% and 1.02 MJ·kg-1, respectively, and the DMD and EHGE in the bionic enzyme group were the greatest in wheat bran by 6.59% and 1.37 MJ·kg-1, respectively. The soluble NSP content was less than the insoluble NSP of 6 feedstuffs. Total NSP content of corn was the lowest (8.59%), whereas the total NSP content of soybean hull was the highest (75.72%). The main components of NSP included arabinose, xylose, mannose and glucose, but the 4 monosaccharide content varied in the feed ingredients. The NSP content was negatively related with the DMD, GED of feedstuffs (P<0.05).The relationship between the DMD and TNSP contents of the 6 feedstuffs in the bionic enzyme group (R2=0.95, P<0.01) was higher than in the cellulase group (R2=0.94, P<0.01) and in the Viscozyme group (R2=0.93, P<0.01). The relationship between the GED and TNSP contents of the 6 feedstuffs in the bionic enzyme group (R2=0.89, P<0.01) was also higher than in the cellulase group (R2=0.86, P<0.01) and in the Viscozyme group (R2=0.81, P<0.01). 【Conclusion】 In conclusion, the inclusion of bionic enzyme to simulate hindgut digestion has a significant effect on the in vitro energy digestion of feedstuffs than the inclusion of cellulase and Viscozyme. The bionic enzyme can be used to simulate the hindgut digestion using the SDS.

Key words: in vitro, hindgut enzyme, non-starch polysaccharide, digestibility, enzyme hydrolysate gross energy, simulated digestion system

[1]    张宏福, 赵峰, 张子仪.仿生消化法评定猪饲料生物学效价的研究进展. 饲料与畜牧, 2011,3:5-9.
ZHANG H F, ZHAO F, ZHANG Z Y. The in vitro method to estimate the digestibility of swine feeds using the Simulative Digestion System. Feed and Husbandry, 2011, 3: 5-9. (in Chinese)
[2]    陈亮, 张宏福, 高理想. 仿生法评定饲料干物质消化率的影响因素. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46: 3199-3205.
CHEN L, ZHANG H F, GAO L X. Factors Affecting the measure of the in vitro dry matter digestibility of feeds using simulative digestion system. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46: 3199-3205. (in Chinese)
[3]    张铁鹰, 汪儆. 单胃动物体外消化模拟技术研究进展. 动物营养学报, 2005, 17(2): 1-8.
ZHANG T Y, WANG J. Recent advances in in vitro methods for simulating monogastric animal digestion. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2005, 17(2): 1-8. ( in Chinese)
[4]    ZHAO F, REN L Q, MI B M, TAN H Z, ZHAO J T, LI H, ZHANG H F, ZHANG Z Y. Developing a computer-controlled simulated digestion system to predict the concentration of metabolizable energy of feedstuffs for rooster. Journal of Animal Science, 2014, 92: 1537-1547.
[5]    ZHAO F, ZHANG L, MI B M, ZHANG H F, HOU S S, ZHANG Z Y. Using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system to predict the energetic value of corn for duck. Poultry Science, 2014, 93: 1410-1420.
[6]    VAN DER MEER J M, PEREZ J M. In vitro evaluation of European diets for pigs. Prediction of the organic matter digestibility by an enzymic method or by chemical analysis. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1992, 59: 359-363.
[7]    HUANG G, SAUER W C, HE J, HWANGBO J, WANG X. The nutritive value of hulled and hulless barley for growing pigs. 1.Determination of energy and protein digestibility with the in vivo and in vitro method. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 2003, 12: 759-769.
[8]    REGMI P R, SAUER W C, ZIJLSTRA R T. Prediction of in vivo apparent total tract energy digestibility of barley in grower pigs using an in vitro digestibility technique. Journal of animal Science, 2008, 86(10): 2619-2626.
[9]    BOISEN S, FERNÁNDEZ J A. Prediction of the total tract digestibility of energy in feedstuffs and pig diets by in vitro analyses. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1997, 68: 277-286.
[10]   NOBLET J, PEYRAUD Y J. Prediction of digestibility of organic matter and energy in the growing pig from an in vitro method. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2007, 134: 211-222.
[11]   REGMI P R, FERGUSON N S, ZIJLSTRA R T. In vitro digestibility techniques to predict apparent total tract energy digestibility of wheat in grower pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 2009, 87: 3620-3629.
[12]   钟永兴.猪饲料消化能值测定的仿生消化法研究[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2010.
ZHONG Y X. Study on digestible energy in swine with Bionic Digestion System[D]. Guangzhou: South China Agriculture University, 2010. (in Chinese)
[13]   COLES L T, MOUGHAN P J, DARRAGH A J. In vitro digestion and fermentation methods, including gas production techniques, as applied to nutritive evaluation of foods in the hindgut of humans and other simple-stomached animals. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2005, 123-124: 421-444.
[14]   BACH KNUDSEN K E, JENSEN B B, INGE H. Digestion of polysaccharides and other major components in the small and large-intestine of pigs fed of diets consisting of oat fractions rich in betad glucan. British Journal of Nutrition, 1993, 70: 537-556.
[15]   GAO L X, CHEN L, HUANG Q H, MENG L H, ZHONG R Q, LIU C L, TANG X F, ZHANG H F. Effect of dietary fiber type on intestinal nutrient digestibility and hindgut fermentation of diets fed to finishing pigs. Livestock Science, 2015, 174: 53-58.
[16]   HOODA S, METZLER-ZEBELI B U, VASANTHAN T, ZIJLSTRA R T. Effects of viscosity and fermentability of purified non-starch polysaccharides on ileal and total tract nutrient digestibility in ileal-cannulated grower pigs. Livestock Science, 2010, 134: 79-81.
[17]   赵峰, 张宏福, 张子仪. 单胃动物仿生消化系统操作手册.2版. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2011.
ZHAO F, ZHANG H F, ZHANG Z Y. Operation Manual of Simulative Digestion System. 2nd ed. Beijing: Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2011. (in Chinese)
[18]   黄庆华, 陈亮, 高理想, 刘强, 卢凌, 唐湘方, 刘蕾, 张宏福.乙酸酐衍生化气相色谱法测定饲料非淀粉多糖含量时适宜称样量确定依据的研究. 动物营养学报, 2015, 27: 1620-1631. (in Chinese)
HUANG Q H, CHEN L, GAO L X, LIU Q, LU L, TANG X F, LIU L, ZHANG H F. The research of appropriate sample weight of the method for determining non-starch polysaccharides of feedstuffs using gas-liquid chromatography with aiditol acetates derivatives. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 27: 1620-1631. (in Chinese)
[19]   钟儒清, 陈亮, 高理想, 黄庆华, 刘蕾, 张宏福. 仿生法评定抗草甘膦玉米和转Bt基因玉米的酶水解物能值的研究. 动物营养学报, 2015, 27(5): 1468-1476.
ZHONG R Q, CHEN L, GAO L X, HUANG Q H, LIU L, ZHANG H F. Evaluation of enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy of glyphosate- tolerant corn and transgenic Bt corn using simulative digestion system. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 27(5): 1468-1476. (in Chinese)
[20]   李辉, 赵峰, 计峰, 张宏福.仿生消化系统测定鸭饲料原料代谢能的重复性与精密度检验. 动物营养学报, 2010, 22: 1709-1716.
LI H, ZHAO F, JI F, ZHANG H F. A test on repeatability and precision for determining metabolizable energy of duck feedstuffs using Bionic Digestion System. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2010, 22: 1709-1716. (in Chinese)
[21]   CHEN L, GAO L X, HUANG Q H, LU Q P, SA R N, ZHANG H F. Prediction of digestible energy of feed ingredients for growing pigs using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system, Journal of Animal Science, 2014, 92:3876-3883.
[22]   REGMI P R, METZLER-ZEBELI B U, GÄNZLE M G, VAN KEMPEN T A T G, ZIJLSTRA R T. Starch with high amylose content and low in vitro digestibility increases intestinal nutrient flow and microbial fermentation and selectively promotes bifidobacteria in pigs. The Journal of Nutrition, 2011, 141(7): 1273-1280.
[23]   URRIOLA P E, STEIN H H. Effects of distillers dried grains with solubles on amino acid, energy, and fiber digestibility and on hindgut fermentation of dietary fiber in a corn-soybean meal diet fed to growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 2010, 88: 1454-1462.
[24]   CHEN L, ZHANG H F, GAO L X, ZHAO F, LU Q P, SA R N. Effect of graded levels of fiber from alfalfa meal on intestinal nutrient and energy flow, and hindgut fermentation in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 2013, 91: 4757-4764.
[25]   YIN Y L, MCEVOY J D G, SCHULEZ H, HENNIG U, SOUFFRANT W B, MCCRACKEN K J. Apparent digestibility (ileal and overall) of nutrients and endogenous nitrogen losses in growing pigs fed wheat (var. Soissons) or its by-products without or with xylanase supplementation. Livestock Production Science, 2000, 62: 119-132.
[26] JAWORSK N W, LARKE H N, BACH KNUDSEN K E, STEIN H H. Carbohydrate composition and in vitro digestibility of dry matter and non-starch polysaccharides in corn, sorghum, and wheat and coproducts from these grains. Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 93: 1103-1113.
[1] XIAO LuTing,LI XiuHong,LIU LiJun,YE FaYin,ZHAO GuoHua. Effects of Starch Granule Size on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Barley Starches [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 1010-1024.
[2] NUERHATI·Silafuer ,WUSIMAN·Yimiti . Effects of Amino Acid By-Products on Fermentation Quality and Digestibility of White Sorghum Silage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4065-4074.
[3] DENG FuLi,SHEN Dan,ZHONG RuQing,ZHANG ShunFen,LI Tao,SUN ShuDong,CHEN Liang,ZHANG HongFu. Non-Starch Polysaccharide Enzymes Cocktail of Corn-Miscellaneous Meal-Based Diet Optimization by In Vitro Method and Its Effects on Intestinal Microbiome in Finishing Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3242-3255.
[4] WANG JinFei,YANG GuoYi,FAN ZiHan,LIU Qi,ZHANG PengCheng,REN YouShe,YANG ChunHe,ZHANG ChunXiang. Effects of Whole Plant Corn Silage Ratio in Diet on Growth Performance, Rumen Fermentation, Nutrient Digestibility and Serological Parameters of Dorper×Hu Crossbred Female Lambs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 831-844.
[5] ZHANG DanDan,XU TengTeng,GAO Di,QI Xin,NING Wei,RU ZhenYuan,ZHANG XiangDong,GUO TengLong,SHENTU LuYan,YU Tong,MA YangYang,LI YunSheng,ZHANG YunHai,CAO ZuBing. Transcription Factor TEAD4 Regulates Early Embryonic Development in Pigs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4456-4465.
[6] CHEN Yuan,CAI He,LI Li,WANG LinJie,ZHONG Tao,ZHANG HongPing. Alternative Splicing of TNNT3 and Its Effect on the Differentiation of MuSCs in Goat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4466-4477.
[7] WANG YuLin,LEI Lin,XIONG WenWen,YE FaYin,ZHAO GuoHua. Effects of Steaming-Retrogradation Pretreatment on Physicochemical Properties and in Vitro Starch Digestibility of the Roasted Highland Barley Flour [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(19): 4207-4217.
[8] MIAO JianJun,PENG ZhongLi,GAO YanHua,BAI Xue,XIE XinTing. Effects of Dietary Small Peptides on Production Performance and Expression of PepT1 mRNA in Digestive Tract of Fattening Yaks [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4950-4960.
[9] LI GuiRong,QUAN Ran,CHENG ShanShan,HOU XiaoJin,FAN XiuCai,HU HuiLing. The Influencing Factors of in-vitro Ovule Development in Seedless Grape and Its Physiological Changes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(22): 4646-4657.
[10] LIN WenZhong,WU Ran,JIN Jing,QIU Ping,ZHANG Jie,WU ZuJian,DU ZhenGuo. An in vitro Cap-Snatching System of Rice Stripe Tenuivirus Based on Crude Virion Preparations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4440-4448.
[11] WANG ShiQin,BI YanLiang,ZHAO GuoHong,CUI Kai,HUANG WenQin,ZHANG NaiFeng,LI FaDi,TU Yan,DIAO QiYu. Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Serum Parameters in 0-2 Months Old Hu Lambs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(2): 451-460.
[12] FU LiXia,MA Tao,DIAO QiYu,CHENG ShuRu,SONG YaZhe,SUN ZhuoLin. Establishment of a Prediction Model of Metabolizable Protein of Concentrate for Mutton Sheep [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(3): 539-549.
[13] Wei ZHANG,JinJun DAI,XueHai YANG,JinTao WEI,MingXin CHEN,JunPeng HU,ShaoWen HUANG. Evaluation of Apparent Metabolic Energy, Nitrogen Corrected Metabolic Energy, Biological Value of Protein and Ileal Digestibility of Amino Acid of Yeast Hydrolysate for Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(20): 3685-3694.
[14] ZHOU Yan, DONG LiFeng, DENG KaiDong, XU GuiShan, DIAO QiYu. Development of Models of Methane Emissions from Growing Sheep [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(10): 1797-1806.
[15] ZHANG JiWei,GAO Kun,ZHANG YingJie,LIU YueQin,DUAN ChunHui. Effects of Diets with Energy-to-Nitrogen Rations on Growth Performance and Nutrients Apparent Digestibility in Growing Yanshan Cashmere Goat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(1): 154-165.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!