Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (15): 3090-3100.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.15.020

• RESEARCH NOTES • Previous Articles    

Suitability Evaluation of Different Varieties of Chicken for Cooking Process

WANG Chun-qing1, LI Xia1, ZHANG Chun-hui1, LI Xue-ke1,2, DU Gui-hong3, LI Hai1,2, XIE Xiao-lei1   

  1. 1Institute of Agro-Products Processing Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193
    2College of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067
    3Hebi Protil Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Hebi 458000, Henan
  • Received:2015-01-29 Online:2015-08-01 Published:2015-08-01

Abstract: 【Objective】Different varieties of chicken were selected as the research objects, to analyze the raw meat and cooked meat quality of broilers so as to provide references for the selection of specific varieties of chicken for processing and cooking. 【Method】 The quality indices of raw and cooked meat were measured by 16 and 9 evaluation indices, respectively. The correlation between raw meat and cooked meat was analyzed by correlation analysis. Factors were analyzed to screen the evaluation indices of raw meat for cooking and processing suitability. Then analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to decide the indices’ weight. The comprehensive evaluation scores of ten chickens were calculated by the method of “Reasonable-Satisfaction” (RS), and combined with cluster analysis to divide into different grades. Regression analysis was used to verify the accuracy of the model, and the regression equation was established by sensory evaluation scores (the dependent variable) and comprehensive evaluation scores (the independent variable). 【Result】Ten chicken showed a significant difference in basic quality indices (P<0.05). Shearing force, hardness, spring and chewiness increased after cooking, but sarcomere length shortened, and sarcomere shrinkage of local variety hens (30.41%) was significantly greater than that of other 9 breeds of chickens (P<0.05), and that of Bantam was only 4.99%. The quality indices of raw and cooked meat showed greater coefficient of variation (CV) among different chicken varieties. In the raw meat, the CV of fat content and fibre density were 60.51% and 48.62%, respectively; but in the cooked meat, that of sarcomere shrinkage, chewiness and shearing force were 48.33%, 34.64% and 20.51%, respectively, so the 10 breeds of chicken can be representative varieties. The result of correlation analysis showed that the indices of fat content, L*, shearing force, cooking loss, hardness, chewiness, sarcomere length and shrinkage were significantly correlated with that of cooked meat (P<0.01). The indexes of shearing force, hardness and chewness of raw meat were in highly significantly correlation coefficients which were 0.59, 0.62 and 0.48, respectively, and it indicated that the quality of raw meat had an important effect on that of the production. Cumulative proportion of five principal factors was 90.09%, and it contained 90.09% information of the total amount in the factor analysis. The fat content, shearing force, hardness, chewiness, sarcomere length and shrinkage were chosen as evaluation indices of cooking process suitability evaluation by factor analysis from 16 indices of raw meat because of their proportions to five principal factors were great and their weight was 0.0603, 0.1045, 0.0920, 0.2223, 0.0416, 0.1898 and 0.2896, respectively by AHP. And the comprehensive evaluation model was Y=0.0603×Mf+0.1045×Ms+0.0920×Mh+0.2223×Mc+0.0416×Msl+0.1898×Msk+0.2896×Mvs, which could count the comprehensive evaluation scores of the ten chickens. The result of cluster analysis showed that the ten chickens could be divided into three classes, which were based on the comprehensive evaluation scores, among the 10 varieties of chicken, Tsingyuan chicken, Spring chicken and AA broiler chicken are most suitable for cooking, the local variety hens are unsuitable for cooking, and the other chickens are more suitable for cooking. Results obtained from regression analysis showed that the regression equation was y=1.899x-0.510, which indicated that the comprehensive evaluation model was acceptable (R2=0.887), and could be used to evaluate the suitability of unknown varieties.【Conclusion】Among the 10 varieties of chicken, Tsingyuan chicken, Spring chicken and AA broiler chicken are most suitable for cooking, the local variety hens was unsuitable for cooking, the other chickens are more suitable for cooking. In this study, based on the raw meat, the suitability evaluation model for cooking processing was set up and could also provide a two-way theoretical support.

Key words: chicken, breeds, cooking processing, processing suitability, evaluation, multivariate statistical analysis

[1]    王济民. 全球肉鸡产业发展现状及我国肉鸡产业面临的形式. 今日畜牧兽医, 2014(6): 39-40.
Wang J M. Poultry industry development present situation in the global and the form of poultry industry in our country. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, 2014(6): 39-40. ( in Chinese)
[2]    Zhao J P, Zhao G P, Jiang R R, Zheng M Q, Chen J L, Liu R R, Wen J. Effects of diet-induced differences in growth rate on metabolic histological, and meat-quality properties of 2 muscles in male chickens of 2 distinct broiler breeds. Poultry Science, 2012, 91(1): 237-247.
[3]    文杰. 我国肉鸡产业现状与肉鸡安全. 中国家禽, 2013, 35(10): 34-35.
Wen J. Current situation of poultry industry and the security in China. China Poultry, 2013, 35(10): 34-35. (in Chinese)
[4]    刘媛, 阮征, 李汴生, 陈坚成, 郭伟波, 林光明. 响应面分析优化盐焗骨泥鸡肉肠配方的研究. 现代食品科技, 2012, 28(2): 172-175.
Liu Y, Ruan Z, Li B S, Chen J C, Guo W B, Lin G M. Optimization of formula of salted bone paste chicken sausage by response surface analysis. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2012, 28(2): 172-175. (in Chinese )
[5]    畅阳, 王鹏, 徐幸莲, 姜姗姗. 不同种木薯变性淀粉对鸡肉肠品质的影响. 食品工业科技, 2012, 33(7): 58-62.
Chang Y, Wang P, Xu X L, Jiang S S. Effect of different kinds of modified tapioca starch on the qualities of chicken sausage. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2012, 33(7): 58-62. (in Chinese)
[6]    章薇, 吴娟, 熊国远. 鸡肉加工过程中微生物控制的探讨. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2010, 31(5): 93-94.
Zhang W, Wu J, Xiong G Y. Microoranism control in process of chicken products. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2010, 31(5): 93-94. (in Chinese)
[7]    聂继云, 毋永龙, 李海飞, 王昆, 李静, 李志霞, 徐国锋. 苹果品种用于加工鲜榨汁的适宜性评价. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(17): 271-278.
Nie J Y, Wu Y L, Li H F, Wang K, Li J, Li Z X, Xu G F. Suitability evaluation of apple cultivars for fresh juice-processing. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(17): 271-278. (in Chinese )
[8]    公丽艳, 孟宪军, 刘乃侨, 毕金峰. 基于主成分与聚类分析的苹果加工品质评价. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(13): 276-285.
Gong L Y, Meng X J, Liu N Q, Bi J F. Evaluation of apple quality based on principal component and hierarchical cluster analysis. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(13): 276-285. (in Chinese )
[9]    王丽, 王强, 刘红芝, 杜寅, 张建书. 花生品质对于其蛋白凝胶性的影响. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(17): 260-267.
Wang L, Wang Q, Liu H Z, Du Y, Zhang J S. Effect ofpeanut quality on protein gel property. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(17): 260-267. (in Chinese )
[10]   李春红, 姚兴东, 鞠宝韬, 朱明月, 王海英, 张惠君, 敖雪, 于翠梅, 谢甫绨, 宋书宏. 不同基因型大豆耐荫性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(15): 2927-2939.
Li C H, Yao X D, Ju B T, Zhu M Y, Wang H Y, Zhang H J, Ao X, Yu C M, Xie F T, Song S H. Analysis of shade-tolerance and determination of shade-tolerance evaluation indicators in different soybean genotypes. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(15): 2927-2939. (in Chinese )
[11]   王春青, 李侠, 张春晖, 陈旭华, 孙红梅, 李银, 李海, 何雷堂. 肌原纤维特性与鸡肉原料肉品质的关系. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(10): 2003-2012.
Wang C Q, Li X, Zhang C H, Chen X H, Sun H M, Li Y, Li H, He L T. Study on relationship between myofibril characteristic and meat quality of chicken raw meat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(10): 2003-2012. (in Chinese )
[12]   谢小雷, 李侠, 张春晖, 贾伟, 孙红梅, 王兆进. 穆国锋. 中红外-热风组合干燥牛肉干降低能耗提高品质. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(23): 217-226.
Xie X L, Li X, Zhang C H, Jia W, Sun H M, Wang Z J, Mu G F. Combined mid-infrared and hot air drying reduces energy- consumption and improves quality of jerky. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(23): 217-226. (in Chinese )
[13]   黄曙光, 杨谷良, 方传锦. 运用多维价值理论对40个梨品种果品品质的评价. 湖南林业科技, 2003, 30(4): 26-27.
Huang S G, Yang G L, Fang C J. Quality evaluation of 40 varieties of pear fruit by using the theory of multidimensional value. Hunan Forestry Science and Technology, 2003, 30(4): 26-27. (in Chinese )
[14]   Tøgersen G, Isaksson T, Nilsen B N, Bakker E A, Hidrum K I. On-line NIR analysis of fat, water and protein in industrial scale ground meat batches. Meat Science, 1999, 51(1): 97-102.
[15]   Schindler S, Krings U, Berger R G, Orlien V. Aroma development in high pressure treat beef and chicken meat compared to raw and heat treated. Meat Science, 2010, 86(2): 317-323.
[16]   Martinaud A, Mercier Y, Marinova P, Tassy C, Gatellier P, Renerre M. Comparison of oxidative processes on myofibrillar proteins from beef during maturation and by different model oxidation systems. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1997, 45(7): 2481-2487.
[17]   Kondjoyan A, Oillic S, Portanguen S, Portanguen S, Gros J B. Combined heattransfer and kinetic models to predict cookingloss during heat treatment of beef meat. Meat Science, 2013, 95(2): 336-344.
[18]   Ruiz de Huidobro F, Miguel E, Blázquez B, Onega E. A comparison between two methods (Warner-Bratzler and texture pro?le analysis) for testing either raw meat or cooked meat. Meat Science, 2005, 69(3): 527-536.
[19]   Karumendu L U, van de Ven R, Kerr M J, Lanza M, Hopkins D L. Particle size analysis of lamb meat: effect of homogenization speed, comparison with myofibrillar fragmentation index and its relationship with shear force. Meat Science, 2009, 82(4): 425-431.
[20]   An J Y,Zheng J X, Li J Y, Zeng D, Qu L J, Xu G Y, Yang N. Effect of myofiber characteristics and thickness of perimysium and endomysiumon meat tenderness of chickens. Poultry Science, 2010, 89(8): 1750-1754.
[21]   Oillic S, Lemoine E, Gros J B, Kondjoyan A. Kinetic analysis of cooking losses from beef and other animal muscles heated in a water bath-Effect of sample dimensions and prior freezing and ageing. Meat Science, 2011, 88(3): 338-346.
[22]   Chuaynukool K, Wattanachant S, Siripongvutikorn S. Chemical and physical properties of raw and cooked spent hen, broiler and Thai indigenous chicken muscles in mixed herbs acidified soup (Tom Yum). Journal of Food Technology, 2007, 5(2):180-186.
[23]   Palka K, Daun H. Changes in texture, cooking losses, and myofibrillar structure of bovine M.semitendinosus during heating. Meat Science, 1999, 51(3): 237-243.
[24]   聂继云, 毋永龙, 李海飞, 王昆, 徐国锋, 闫震, 吴锡. 苹果鲜榨汁品质评价体系构建. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(8): 1657-1667.
Nie J Y, Wu Y L, Li H F, Wang K Xu G F, Yan Z, Wu X. Evaluation system established for fresh apple juice quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(8): 1657-1667. (in Chinese )
[25]   王琳琛. 不同品种羊肉制肠适宜性研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013.
Wang L C. Effect of breed on quality of emulsified mutton sausages [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013. (in Chinese )
[26]   薛丹丹. 不同品种羊肉烤制特性及烤制适宜性研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2012.
Xue D D. Study on roast characteristics and suitability of different varieties lamb [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2012. (in Chinese )
[27]   Wattanachant S, Benjakul S, Ledward D A. Composition, color, and texture of Thai indigenous and broiler chicken muscles. Poultry Science, 2004, 83: 123-128.
[28]   Jayasena D D, Kim S H, Lee H J, Jung S, Lee J H, Park H B, Jo C. Comparison of the amounts of taste-related compounds in raw and cooked meats from broilers and Korean native chickens. Poultry Science, 2014, 93: 3163-3170.
[29]   Zhao, J. P, Zhao G P, Jiang R R, Zheng M Q, Chen J L, Liu R R, Wen J. Effects of diet-induced differences in growth rate on metabolic histological, and meat-quality properties of 2 muscles in male chickens of 2 distinct broiler breeds. Poultry Science, 2012, 91: 237-247.
[30]   Kong F. Kinetics of salmon (oncorhynchus gorbuscha) quality changes during thermal processing [D]. Washington, America: Department of Biological Systems Engineering of Washington State University, 2007.
[31]   Kong F, Tang J, Lin M, Rasco B. Therma effects on chicken and salmon muscles: Tenderness, cook loss, area shrinkage, collagen solubility and microstructure. Food Science and Technology, 2008, 41(7): 1210-1222.
[32]   Barbera S, Tassone S. Meat cooking shrinkage: Measurement of a new meat quality parameter. Meat Science, 2006, 73(3): 467-474.
[1] ZHU DaWei,ZHANG LinPing,CHEN MingXue,FANG ChangYun,YU YongHong,ZHENG XiaoLong,SHAO YaFang. Characteristics of High-Quality Rice Varieties and Taste Sensory Evaluation Values in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1271-1283.
[2] WANG YangYang,LIU WanDai,HE Li,REN DeChao,DUAN JianZhao,HU Xin,GUO TianCai,WANG YongHua,FENG Wei. Evaluation of Low Temperature Freezing Injury in Winter Wheat and Difference Analysis of Water Effect Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318.
[3] GOU ZhiWen,YIN Wen,CHAI Qiang,FAN ZhiLong,HU FaLong,ZHAO Cai,YU AiZhong,FAN Hong. Analysis of Sustainability of Multiple Cropping Green Manure in Wheat-Maize Intercropping After Wheat Harvested in Arid Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1319-1331.
[4] WANG XiuXiu,XING AiShuang,YANG Ru,HE ShouPu,JIA YinHua,PAN ZhaoE,WANG LiRu,DU XiongMing,SONG XianLiang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Characters of Nature Population in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[5] ZHANG YaLing, GAO Qing, ZHAO Yuhan, LIU Rui, FU Zhongju, LI Xue, SUN Yujia, JIN XueHui. Evaluation of Rice Blast Resistance and Genetic Structure Analysis of Rice Germplasm in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 625-640.
[6] BIAN NengFei, SUN DongLei, GONG JiaLi, WANG Xing, XING XingHua, JIN XiaHong, WANG XiaoJun. Evaluation of Edible Quality of Roasted Peanuts and Indexes Screening [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 641-652.
[7] LI Long, LI ChaoNan, MAO XinGuo, WANG JingYi, JING RuiLian. Advances and Perspectives of Approaches to Phenotyping Crop Root System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 425-437.
[8] SHU JingTing,SHAN YanJu,JI GaiGe,ZHANG Ming,TU YunJie,LIU YiFan,JU XiaoJun,SHENG ZhongWei,TANG YanFei,LI Hua,ZOU JianMin. Relationship Between Expression Levels of Guangxi Partridge Chicken m6A Methyltransferase Genes, Myofiber Types and Myogenic Differentiation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 589-601.
[9] ZHANG YaNan,JIN YongYan,ZHUANG ZhiWei,WANG Shuang,XIA WeiGuang,RUAN Dong,CHEN Wei,ZHENG ChunTian. Comparison of Shell Mechanical Property, Ultrastructure and Component Between Chicken and Duck Eggs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4957-4968.
[10] TU YunJie,JI GaiGe,ZHANG Ming,LIU YiFan,JU XiaoJun,SHAN YanJu,ZOU JianMin,LI Hua,CHEN ZhiWu,SHU JingTing. Screening of Wnt3a SNPs and Its Association Analysis with Skin Feather Follicle Density Traits in Chicken [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4769-4780.
[11] SHEN Qian,ZHANG SiPing,LIU RuiHua,LIU ShaoDong,CHEN Jing,GE ChangWei,MA HuiJuan,ZHAO XinHua,YANG GuoZheng,SONG MeiZhen,PANG ChaoYou. Construction of A Comprehensive Evaluation System and Screening of Cold Tolerance Indicators for Cold Tolerance of Cotton at Seedling Emergence Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4342-4355.
[12] HUANG XunHe,WENG ZhuoXian,LI WeiNa,WANG Qing,HE DanLin,LUO Wei,ZHANG XiQuan,DU BingWang. Genetic Diversity of Indigenous Yellow-Feathered Chickens in Southern China Inferred from Mitochondrial DNA D-Loop Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4526-4538.
[13] WANG ZhePeng,ZHOU WenXin,HE JunXi,HU QiaoYan,ZHAO JiaYue. Association of Levels of Cholecystokinin A Receptor Expression and Sequence Variants with Feed Conversion Efficiency of Lueyang Black-Boned Chicken [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4539-4549.
[14] GAO XiaoQin,NIE JiYun,CHEN QiuSheng,HAN LingXi,LIU Lu,CHENG Yang,LIU MingYu. Geographical Origin Tracing of Fuji Apple Based on Mineral Element Fingerprinting Technology [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4252-4264.
[15] HU Xin, ZHANG ZhiLiang, ZHANG Fei, DENG Bo, FANG WeiMin. Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Hybrid Offsprings of Large-Flowered Tea Chrysanthemum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4036-4051.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!