Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (24): 4957-4968.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.24.013

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of Shell Mechanical Property, Ultrastructure and Component Between Chicken and Duck Eggs

ZHANG YaNan(),JIN YongYan(),ZHUANG ZhiWei,WANG Shuang,XIA WeiGuang,RUAN Dong,CHEN Wei(),ZHENG ChunTian()   

  1. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition/State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding/Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (South China) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agriculture Science, Guangzhou 510640
  • Received:2021-08-18 Accepted:2022-10-23 Online:2022-12-16 Published:2023-01-04
  • Contact: Wei CHEN,ChunTian ZHENG E-mail:zyn3299@126.com;jinyongyan20@stu.gdou.edu.cn;chenwei@gdaas.cn;zhengchuntian@gdaas.cn

Abstract:

【Objective】The research was conducted to study the comparison of shell mechanical property, ultrastructure and component between chicken and duck eggs. 【Method】160 eggs at the average weight from laying hens (Hy-Line grey) or ducks (Longyan Shanma) in aged 45 weeks were randomly divided into 2 groups, respectively. Each group had 20 eggs with 8 replicates. The laying hens and ducks were fed with maize-soybean meal basal diet, and the nutritional levels were formulated according to the national standard. The eggshell strength was measured by eggshell strength analyzer, the thickness of eggshell membrane and calcified eggshell was measured by digital micrometer, and then the eggshell ratio and toughness were calculated. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the ultrastructure of eggshell and to measure the effective thickness, mammillary thickness and width, and then to calculate the total thickness, the ratio of effective or mammillary thickness relative to total thickness. The mammillary structure was also observed by SEM and the degree of variation was scored. After crushing and extracting the eggshell, the content of matrix protein was determined by Coomassie brilliant blue method. After microwave digestion, the content of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, manganese, copper and zinc in eggshell were determined according to the national standard method. 【Result】In comparison with chicken eggshell, the weight of duck egg and eggshell were increased (P<0.01), but the shell ratio was not changed (P>0.05); the eggshell breaking strength, toughness and eggshell membrane thickness were increased (P<0.01), but the thickness of the calcified eggshell (without shell membrane) was not changed (P>0.05). In respect to the ultrastructure, the thickness of mammillary layer and the number of mammillary knobs in per unit were decreased, but the mammillary knob width and mammillary layer ratio in duck eggshell were increased in relative to those of chicken eggs (P<0.001). No differences were observed in total and effective thickness (P>0.05), but the ratio of effective layer relative to total thickness was increased in duck eggshell (P<0.001). About the ultrastructure of mammillary knobs, there were no significant differences in the mammillae density, type B, type A, aragonite, cuff and pitted structure scores of the duck eggshell (P>0.05), the scores of the variations such as caps, early fusion and late fusion, and the total score of knobs were decreased in duck eggshell compared with chicken eggshell (P<0.05). There was higher frequency of mammillary structure variation in the chicken eggshell than the duck eggshell. The groove-like traces on the cap structure of the duck eggshell were deeper and clearer, the early fusion was more extensive, and the bonding between the knobs and the shell membrane fibers were denser than that in chicken eggshell. The contents of phosphorus, copper and manganese in duck eggshell were increased (P < 0.05), but the magnesium and matrix protein contents were decreased in duck eggshells relative to those in chicken eggshell (P<0.001), and there were no significant differences in calcium and zinc content (P>0.05). 【Conclusion】Above all, the eggshell quality of chicken and duck eggs were similar, and there were no differences in eggshell ratio, thickness of calcified layer, calcium and zinc content in eggshells. Compared with the chicken eggshell, the mechanical properties of duck eggshell were better, for shell breaking strength and toughness of duck eggshell were increased, which mainly due to the improvement of shell ultrastructure by increasing effective thickness and the ameliorate of mammillary knobs in duck eggshell. In addition, the phosphorus, copper and manganese content in duck eggshell were increased, but the content of magnesium and matrix proteins were decreased. In some content, the quality of duck eggshell could be improved by regulating the mineral elements and matrix protein content in eggshell, and modulated the process of eggshell formation, especially the deposition of calcium carbonate in the mammillary and palisade layers, and increased effective thickness and improved structure of the mammillary layer.

Key words: chicken eggshell, duck eggshell, mechanical properties, ultrastructure, eggshell components

Table 1

Basal diet composition and nutritional level of laying hens"

原料Raw material 含量Content (%) 营养成分Nutritional ingredient 含量Content
玉米Corn (CP 7.8%) 64.21 代谢能ME (MJ·kg-1) 11.29
豆粕Sbean meal (CP 43%) 25.55 粗蛋白质CP (%) 16.49
石粉Limestone 8.35 钙Ca (%) 3.50
磷酸氢钙CaHPO4 1.14 总磷TP (%) 0.52
食盐NaCl 0.30 赖氨酸Lys (%) 0.84
蛋氨酸Met (98%) 0.11 蛋氨酸Met (%) 0.38
预混料Premix 0.34 蛋氨酸+胱氨酸 (%) 0.65
合计Total 100.00

Table 2

Basal diet composition and nutritional level of laying ducks"

原料Raw material 含量Content (%) 营养成分Nutritional ingredient 含量Content
玉米Corn (CP 7.8%) 53.79 代谢能ME (MJ·kg-1) 10.46
豆粕Soybean meal (CP 43%) 23.19 粗蛋白CP (%) 16.50
麦麸Wheat bran 11.73 钙Ca (%) 3.60
石粉Limestone 8.57 总磷TP (%) 0.60
蛋氨酸Met (98%) 0.16 非植酸磷NPP (%) 0.34
赖氨酸Lys 0.03 赖氨酸Lys (%) 0.84
磷酸氢钙CaHPO4 1.23 蛋氨酸Met (%) 0.41
食盐NaCl 0.30
预混料Premix 1.00
合计Total 100.00

Table 3

Scoring criteria for ultrastructure of mastoid"

指标Item 等级及评分Grade and score
帽子Caps 好Good (1) Good- (3) Poor(6) 差Poor (8) -Poor- (10)
汇流Confluence 无None (3) 孤立Isolated (4) 中等Moderate (6) 广泛Extensive (1)
B型Type B 无None (1) 孤立Isolated (2) 中等Moderate (5) 广泛Extensive (8)
A型Type A 无None (1) 孤立Isolated (2)
霰石Aragonite 无None (1) 孤立Isolated (2) 中等Moderate (5)
早期融合Early fusion 孤立Isolated (4) 中等Moderate (2) 广泛Extensive (1)
晚期融合Late fusion 孤立Isolated (1) 中等Moderate (3) 广泛Extensive (6)
袖口Cuffing 无None (5) 独立Isolated (4) 中等Moderated (1)
凹陷Pitted 无None (1) 坑洼Depression (5) 侵蚀Erosion (7) 孔洞Hole (12)
总分Total score 优秀Excelle (<20) 好Good (20-29) Good- (30-34) Poor+ (35-39) 差Poor (40-49) -Poor-- (>50)

Table 4

Comparison of shell mechanical properties between chicken and duck egg"

项目Item 鸡蛋Chicken egg 鸭蛋Duck egg P P-value
蛋重Egg weight (g) 57.57±0.28 66.60±0.28 <0.001
蛋壳重Eggshell weight (g) 5.33±0.033 6.11±0.043 <0.001
蛋壳比例Eggshell ratio (%) 9.25±0.073 9.17±0.055 0.430
蛋壳韧性Eggshell toughness (N/mm2/3) 425.99±5.17 466.91±7.89 0.001
蛋壳强度Eggshell strength (N) 33.99±0.49 38.66±1.01 0.001
蛋壳膜厚Eggshell membrane thickness (mm) 0.062±0.00078 0.10±0.0013 <0.001
蛋壳厚度Eggshell calcification thickness (mm) 0.35±0.0031 0.35±0.0038 0.222

Table 5

Comparison of shell ultrastructure between chicken and duck egg"

项目Item 鸡蛋Chicken egg 鸭蛋Duck egg PP-value
总厚度Total thickness (μm) 304.27±3.56 304.54±3.14 0.958
有效厚度Effective thickness (μm) 233.16±3.66 238.45±3.14 0.325
有效层比例Effective layer ratio (%) 76.61±0.93 78.17±0.31 0.004
乳突厚度Mammillary thickness (μm) 71.11±0.56 66.45±0.93 0.001
乳突层比例Mammillary layer ratio (%) 23.39±0.33 21.83±0.31 0.004
乳突个数Mammillary knobs (个/mm) 15.41±0.18 13.79±0.30 <0.001
乳突宽度 Mammillary width (μm) 65.37±0.60 73.21±1.61 <0.001

Fig. 1

Eggshell ultrastructure of chicken (A) and duck (B) egg TT: Total thickness; ET: Effective thickness; MT: Mammillary thickness"

Table 6

Comparison of mammillary knobs ultrastructure between chicken and duck egg"

项目Item 鸡蛋Chicken egg 鸭蛋Duck egg PP-value
乳突密度 Mammillae (mm2) 227.33±3.31 224.88±6.32 0.710
帽子结构 Caps 2.86±0.45 1.54±0.14 0.015
汇流 Confluence 3.82±0.17 3.40±0.070 0.038
B型 Type B 1.50±0.63 1.13±0.040 0.133
A型 Type A 1.25±0.091 1.11±0.055 0.213
霰石 Aragonite 1.42±0.070 1.28±0.052 0.130
早期融合 Early fusion 1.86±0.084 1.60±0.073 0.035
晚期融合 Late fusion 3.89±0.23 3.25±0.16 0.038
袖口 Cuffing 3.61±0.15 3.64±0.31 0.935
凹陷 Pitted 1.28±0.14 1.00±0.00 0.073
总分 Total score 21.46±0.98 17.95±0.43 0.006

Fig. 2

Ultrastructure of mammillary knobs between chicken (left) and duck (right) egg A: Late fusion (×100); B: Early fusion (×100); C: None confluence (×160); D: None confluence (×160); E: Isolated cuffing (×500); F: Moderate cuffing (×500); G: (1) Type A, (2) Type B, (3) Good- caps (×750); H: Good caps (×750); I: Isolated cubic aragonite (×2000); J: Isolated clusters of aragonites (×2000)"

Table 7

Comparison of shell components between chicken and duck egg"

项目Item 鸡蛋Chicken egg 鸭蛋Duck egg PP-value
钙 Calcium (%) 34.11±0.37 33.95±0.41 0.765
磷 Phosphorus (%) 0.193±0.018 0.294±0.033 0.017
镁 Magnesium (%) 0.29±0.0041 0.092±0.0016 <0.001
铜 Copper (mg/kg) 0.53±0.033 17.66±0.53 0.004
锰 Manganese (mg/kg) 0.22±0.013 0.67±0.018 0.001
锌 Zinc (mg/kg) 2.57±0.43 1.74±0.17 0.375
蛋白 Protein (mg/g) 9.10±0.49 6.12±0.16 <0.001
[1] WILSON P B. Recent advances in avian egg science: a review. Poultry Science, 2017, 96(10): 3747-3754. doi:10.3382/ps/pex187.
doi: 10.3382/ps/pex187 pmid: 28938769
[2] MA Y F, YAO J W, ZHOU S, MI Y L, LI J, ZHANG C Q. Improvement of eggshell quality by dietary N-carbamylglutamate supplementation in laying chickens. Poultry Science, 2020, 99(8): 4085-4095. doi:10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.004.
doi: S0032-5791(20)30241-8 pmid: 32731996
[3] PARK J A, SOHN S H. The influence of hen aging on eggshell ultrastructure and shell mineral components. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources, 2018, 38(5): 1080-1091. doi:10.5851/kosfa.2018.e41.
doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2018.e41
[4] MARIE P, LABAS V, BRIONNE A, HARICHAUX G, HENNEQUET- ANTIER C, NYS Y, GAUTRON J. Quantitative proteomics and bioinformatic analysis provide new insight into protein function during avian eggshell biomineralization. Journal of Proteomics, 2015, 113: 178-193. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2014.09.024.
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.09.024 pmid: 25284052
[5] GAUTRON J. Proteomics analysis of avian eggshell matrix proteins: toward new advances on biomineralization. Proteomics, 2019, 19(13): e1900120. doi:10.1002/pmic.201900120.
doi: 10.1002/pmic.201900120
[6] 张亚男. 饲粮锰调控鸡蛋壳品质的作用机制研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2017.
ZHANG Y N. Dietary manganese supplementation modulated eggshell quality in laying hens[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2017. (in Chinese)
[7] DUNN I C, RODRÍGUEZ-NAVARRO A B, MCDADE K, SCHMUTZ M, PREISINGER R, WADDINGTON D, WILSON P W, BAIN M M. Genetic variation in eggshell crystal size and orientation is large and these traits are correlated with shell thickness and are associated with eggshell matrix protein markers. Animal Genetics, 2012, 43(4): 410-418. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02280.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02280.x pmid: 22497523
[8] BAIN M M. Eggshell strength: a mechanical/ultrastructural evaluation[D]. Glasgow: University of Glasgow, 1990.
[9] PANHELEUX M, NYS Y, WILLIAMS J, GAUTRON J, BOLDICKE T, HINCKE M T. Extraction and quantification by ELISA of eggshell organic matrix proteins (ovocleidin-17, ovalbumin, ovotransferrin) in shell from young and old hens. Poultry Science, 2000, 79(4): 580-588. doi:10.1093/ps/79.4.580.
doi: 10.1093/ps/79.4.580 pmid: 10780658
[10] 张凯. 鸭蛋壳的力学特性及多孔超微结构的渗透特性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2012.
ZHANG K. Research on mechanics of duck eggshells and its permeability of porous ultrastructure[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[11] BAIN M M. Recent advances in the assessment of eggshell quality and their future application. World's Poultry Science Journal, 2005, 61(2): 268-277. doi:10.1079/wps200459.
doi: 10.1079/wps200459
[12] RODRIGUEZ-NAVARRO A, KALIN O, NYS Y, GARCIA-RUIZ J M. Influence of the microstructure on the shell strength of eggs laid by hens of different ages. British Poultry Science, 2002, 43(3): 395-403. doi:10.1080/00071660120103675.
doi: 10.1080/00071660120103675
[13] MACLEOD N, BAIN M M, HANCOCK J W. The mechanics and mechanisms of failure of hens’ eggs. International Journal of Fracture, 2006, 142(1/2): 29-41. doi:10.1007/s10704-006-9018-5.
doi: 10.1007/s10704-006-9018-5
[14] KETTA M, TŮMOVÁ E. Eggshell structure, measurements, and quality-affecting factors in laying hens: a review. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 2016, 61(7): 299-309. doi:10.17221/46/2015-cjas.
doi: 10.17221/46/2015-cjas
[15] ATHANASIADOU D, JIANG W G, GOLDBAUM D, SALEEM A, BASU K, PACELLA M S, BÖHM C F, CHROMIK R R, HINCKE M T, RODRÍGUEZ-NAVARRO A B, VALI H, WOLF S E, GRAY J J, BUI K H, MCKEE M D. Nanostructure, osteopontin, and mechanical properties of calcitic avian eggshell. Science Advances, 2018, 4(3): eaar3219. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aar3219.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar3219
[16] NYS Y, GAUTRON J, GARCIA-RUIZ J M, HINCKE M T. Avian eggshell mineralization: biochemical and functional characterization of matrix proteins. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 2004, 3(6/7): 549-562. doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2004.08.002.
doi: 10.1016/j.crpv.2004.08.002
[17] 章世元, 俞路, 王雅倩, 王志跃, 周卫东, 杨海明. 蛋壳质量与元素组成、超微结构关系的研究. 动物营养学报, 2008, 20(4): 423-428.
ZHANG S Y, YU L, WANG Y Q, WANG Z Y, ZHOU W D, YANG H M. Research on the relationships between the quality and elemental composition, ultra-microstructure of eggshell. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2008, 20(4): 423-428. (in Chinese)
[18] FATHI M M, ZEIN EL-DE A, EL-SAFTY S A, RADWAN L M. Using scanning electron microscopy to detect the ultrastructural variations in eggshell quality of fayoumi and dandarawi chicken breeds. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2007, 6(4): 236-241. doi:10.3923/ijps.2007.236.241.
doi: 10.3923/ijps.2007.236.241
[19] RADWAN L M. Eggshell quality: a comparison between Fayoumi, Gimieizah and Brown Hy-Line strains for mechanical properties and ultrastructure of their eggshells. Animal Production Science, 2016, 56(5): 908. doi:10.1071/an14755.
doi: 10.1071/an14755
[20] ARIAS J I, JURE C, WIFF J P, FERNÁNDEZ M S, FUENZALIDA V, ARIAS J L. Effect of sulfate content of biomacromolecules on the crystallization of calcium carbonate. MRS Proceedings, 2001, 711: HH1.7.1. doi:10.1557/proc-711-hh1.7.1.
doi: 10.1557/proc-711-hh1.7.1
[21] RADWAN L M, FATHI M M, GALAL A, EL-DEIN A Z. Mechanical and ultrastructural properties of eggshell in two Egyptian native breeds of chicken. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2009, 9(1): 77-81. doi:10.3923/ijps.2010.77.81.
doi: 10.3923/ijps.2010.77.81
[22] 陈金泉, 任祖方, 任奕林. 鸭蛋壳与鸡蛋壳超微结构比较研究. 中国家禽, 2010, 32(24): 24-26, 31. doi:10.16372/j.issn.1004-6364.2010.24.014.
doi: 10.16372/j.issn.1004-6364.2010.24.014
CHEN J Q, REN Z F, REN Y L. Comparative study on eggshell ultrastructure of duck and chicken. China Poultry, 2010, 32(24): 24-26, 31. doi:10.16372/j.issn.1004-6364.2010.24.014. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16372/j.issn.1004-6364.2010.24.014
[23] KÜÇÜKYILMAZ K, ERKEK R, BOZKURT M. The effects of boron supplementation of layer diets varying in calcium and phosphorus concentrations on performance, egg quality, bone strength and mineral constituents of serum, bone and faeces. British Poultry Science, 2014, 55(6): 804-816. doi:10.1080/00071668.2014.975782.
doi: 10.1080/00071668.2014.975782 pmid: 25330040
[24] WANG S, CHEN W, ZHANG H X, RUAN D, LIN Y C. Influence of particle size and calcium source on production performance, egg quality, and bone parameters in laying ducks. Poultry Science, 2014, 93(10): 2560-2566. doi:10.3382/ps.2014-03962.
doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-03962
[25] KIM C H, PAIK I K, KIL D Y. Effects of increasing supplementation of magnesium in diets on productive performance and eggshell quality of aged laying hens. Biological Trace Element Research, 2013, 151(1): 38-42. doi:10.1007/s12011-012-9537-z.
doi: 10.1007/s12011-012-9537-z pmid: 23111950
[26] BELKAMEH M M, SEDGHI M, AZARFAR A. The effect of different levels of dietary magnesium on eggshell quality and laying hen's performance. Biological Trace Element Research, 2021, 199(4): 1566-1573. doi:10.1007/s12011-020-02259-9.
doi: 10.1007/s12011-020-02259-9
[27] ZAMANI A, RAHMANI H R, POURREZA J. Supplementation of a corn-soybean meal diet with manganese and zinc improves eggshell quality in laying hens. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2005, 8(9): 1311-1317. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2005.1311.1317.
doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2005.1311.1317
[28] ZHANG Y N, ZHANG H J, WANG J, YUE H Y, QI X L, WU S G, QI G H. Effect of dietary supplementation of organic or inorganic zinc on carbonic anhydrase activity in eggshell formation and quality of aged laying hens. Poultry Science, 2017, 96(7): 2176-2183. doi:10.3382/ps/pew490.
doi: 10.3382/ps/pew490 pmid: 28204703
[29] MIN Y N, LIU F X, QI X, JI S, MA S X, LIU X, WANG Z P, GAO Y P. Effects of methionine hydroxyl analog chelated zinc on laying performance, eggshell quality, eggshell mineral deposition, and activities of Zn-containing enzymes in aged laying hens. Poultry Science, 2018, 97(10): 3587-3593. doi:10.3382/ps/pey203.
doi: 10.3382/ps/pey203 pmid: 29860354
[30] XIAO J F, ZHANG Y N, WU S G, ZHANG H J, YUE H Y, QI G H. Manganese supplementation enhances the synthesis of glycosaminoglycan in eggshell membrane: a strategy to improve eggshell quality in laying hens. Poultry Science, 2014, 93(2): 380-388. doi:10.3382/ps.2013-03354.
doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03354 pmid: 24570460
[31] 武书庚. 日粮中不同硫酸铜和柠檬酸铜添加水平及其组合对产蛋鸡生产性能及蛋品质的影响[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2001.
WU S G. Effect of dietary supplementation of cupric salphate and citrate and their combination on performance and egg quality of laying hens[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2001. (in Chinese)
[32] 张亚男, 王晶, 武书庚, 张海军, 齐广海. 微量元素和饲料添加剂调控蛋壳品质的研究进展. 动物营养学报, 2016, 28(10): 3015-3024.
ZHANG Y N, WANG J, WU S G, ZHANG H J, QI G H. Research progress of microelement and feed additives on eggshell quality regulation. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2016, 28(10): 3015-3024. (in Chinese)
[33] 吕娜, 吕林, 廖秀冬, 张丽阳, 罗绪刚. 低磷浓度下原代培养肉鸡鸡胚十二指肠上皮细胞对磷吸收及相关转运载体表达的研究. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(9): 4186-4193.
LÜ N, LÜ L, LIAO X D, ZHANG L Y, LUO X G. Phosphorus absorption and related transporter expression under low phosphorus concentrations in primarily cultured duodenal epithelial cells of broiler embryos. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(9): 4186-4193. (in Chinese)
[34] 初晓娜, 汪以真, 刘光富, 朱连勤. 高磷日粮对肉用仔鸡体组织磷和镁含量的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2004, 40(10): 15-16, 18.
CHU X N, WANG Y Z, LIU G F, ZHU L Q. Effect of high - phosphorus diet on the Ca, P, Mg content in the broiler body tissue. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2004, 40(10): 15-16, 18. (in Chinese)
[35] FENG J, ZHANG H J, WU S G, QI G H, WANG J. Uterine transcriptome analysis reveals mRNA expression changes associated with the ultrastructure differences of eggshell in young and aged laying hens. BMC Genomics, 2020, 21(1): 770. doi:10.1186/s12864-020-07177-7.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07177-7 pmid: 33167850
[36] HINCKE M T, NYS Y, GAUTRON J, MANN K, RODRIGUEZ- NAVARRO A B, MCKEE M D. The eggshell: structure, composition and mineralization. Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark Edition), 2012, 17(4): 1266-1280. doi:10.2741/3985.
doi: 10.2741/3985
[37] ROBERTS J R. Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. The Journal of Poultry Science, 2004, 41(3): 161-177. doi:10.2141/jpsa.41.161.
doi: 10.2141/jpsa.41.161
[38] RODRÍGUEZ-NAVARRO A B, MARIE P, NYS Y, HINCKE M T, GAUTRON J. Amorphous calcium carbonate controls avian eggshell mineralization: a new paradigm for understanding rapid eggshell calcification. Journal of Structural Biology, 2015, 190(3): 291-303. doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2015.04.014.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.04.014
[39] MARIE P, LABAS V, BRIONNE A, HARICHAUX G, HENNEQUET- ANTIER C, RODRIGUEZ-NAVARRO A B, NYS Y, GAUTRON J. Quantitative proteomics provides new insights into chicken eggshell matrix protein functions during the primary events of mineralization and the active calcification phase. Journal of Proteomics, 2015, 126: 140-154. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2015.05.034.
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.05.034
[40] 冯嘉. 蛋鸡产蛋后期鸡蛋蛋壳超微结构特征的形成机理与营养调控[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2021.
FENG J. Mechanism of eggshell ultrastructure formation and nutritional modulation in the late phase production of laying hens[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2021. (in Chinese)
[41] 张亚男, 陈伟, 阮栋, 郑春田. 基质蛋白对蛋壳品质的调控. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(1): 24-31.
ZHANG Y N, CHEN W, RUAN D, ZHENG C T. Regulation of matrix proteins on eggshell quality. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(1): 24-31. (in Chinese)
[1] LI FeiFei, LIAN XueFei, YIN Tao, CHANG YuanYuan, JIN Yan, MA XiaoChuan, CHEN YueWen, YE Li, LI YunSong, LU XiaoPeng. The Relationship Between Mastication and Development of Segment Membranes in Citrus Fruits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 333-344.
[2] PENG Xue,GAO YueXia,ZHANG LinXuan,GAO ZhiQiang,REN YaMei. Effects of High-Energy Electron Beam Irradiation on Potato Storage Quality and Bud Eye Cell Ultrastructure [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1423-1432.
[3] CuiQing WU,JingXin SUN,PingYi GUO,HongFu WANG,XinHui WU. Effects of Agronomic Managements on Yield and Lodging Resistance of Millet [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1127-1142.
[4] Di WU,JiaYu WANG,XiaoZhi TANG,QiuHui HU. Influence of Exogenous Protein Addition on Whole Wheat Dough Properties and Bread Quality Characteristics [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1258-1269.
[5] MA LingLing,FENG Jia,WANG Jing,QI GuangHai,MA YouBiao,WU ShuGeng,ZHANG HaiJun,QIU Kai. The Changes of Eggshell Quality in the Laying Cycle of Hy-Line Brown Layers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(17): 3766-3779.
[6] GAO YingBo,ZHANG Hui,SHAN Jing,XUE YanFang,QIAN Xin,DAI HongCui,LIU KaiChang,LI ZongXin. Effects of Pre-Silking High Temperature Stress on Yield and Ear Development Characteristics of Different Heat-Resistant Summer Maize Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(19): 3954-3963.
[7] SHAO Rui-xin, LI Lei-lei, ZHENG Hui-fang, XIN Long-fei, SU Xiao-yu, RAN Wu-ling, YANG Qing-hua. Effects of Exogenous Nitric Oxide on Photosynthesis of Maize Seedlings Under Drought Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(2): 251-259.
[8] LIU Zi-gang, SUN Wan-cang, FANG Yan, LI Xue-cai, YANG Ning-ning, WU Jun-yan, ZENG Xiu-cun, WANG Yue. Effects of Low Nocturnal Temperature on Photosynthetic Apparatus of Winter Rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(4): 672-682.
[9] SHI Yan-xia, XU Yu-fang, XIE Xue-wen, CHAI A-li, WANG Wei-wei, LI Bao-ju. Effects of FBT on Induction of Systemic Resistance in Cucumber Against Cucumber Fusarium Wilt Caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum Owen [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(19): 3848-3856.
[10] QIN Yu-Zhi-1, XING Zheng-1, ZOU Jian-Feng-2, HE Chang-Zheng-1, LI Yan-Lin-1, XIONG Xing-Yao-1, 3 . Effects of Sustained Weak Light on Seedling Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Potato Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(3): 537-545.
[11] JIANG Shu-zhen, SUN Hua, HUANG Li-bo, YANG Zai-bin, WANG Shu-jing, LIU Fa-xiao, F. Chi. Effects of Zearalenone Contaminated Diets on Serum Metabolite and Histopathology of Liver and Kidney in Weaned Piglets [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(18): 3708-3715.
[12] XIAO Hua-Gui, YANG Huan-Wen, RAO Yong, YANG Bin, ZHU Ying, ZHANG Wen-Long. 甘蓝型油菜黄化突变体的叶绿体超微结构、 气孔特征参数及光合特性 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(4): 715-727.
[13] LIU Chao-Ying, XU Zi-Cheng, SHAO Hui-Fang, SONG Chao-Peng, YANG Jie, GENG Zong-Ze, ZHAO Shuang, ZHANG Li-Ying. Changes of Cell Ultrastructure of Flue-Cured Tobacco Leaves with Different Maturities During Bulk Flue-Curing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(24): 4988-4997.
[14] QIN Hao-Ran, HE Shao-Yu, WU Jie, LI Ji-Lian. Pathogenic Mechanism of Bombus patagiatus Infected by Nosema ceranae [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(22): 4697-4704.
[15] LI Ke-Ming, ZHANG Yong-Jun, WU Kong-Ming, GUO Yu-Yuan. Antenna Ultrastructure of Microplitis mediator [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(17): 3522-3530.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!