Scientia Agricultura Sinica

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Principal Component Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation on Morphological and Agronomic Traits of Drought Tolerance in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)

ZHU Zong-he; ZHENG Wen-yin; ZHANG Xue-kun   

  1. 1、Institute of Oil Crops Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan 430062;
    2、Anhui Tianhe Academy of Agricultural Science and Technology, Hefei 230051;
    3、Department of Agronomy, Anhui Agriculture University, Hefei 230036
  • Received:2010-09-11 Online:2011-05-05 Published:2010-11-22

Abstract: 【Objective】 The morphological and agronomic traits of Brassica napus L. under drought stress during pre-flowering and post-flowering stage were studied for screening and identifying species with drought tolerance.【Method】 Principal component analysis, regression analysis and clustering analysis were used to evaluate the drought tolerance of 49 genotypes based on the morphological and agronomic traits under the conditions of normal water supply and drought stress during pre-flowering and post-flowering stage. This included lateral root dry weight, total root dry weight, lateral root volume, total root volume, total root area, plant dry weight, straw dry weight, above-ground fresh weight, stem diameter, number of green leaf, leaf area, plant height, number of primary branches, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, 1000-seeds weight, and yield per plant.【Result】 Principal component analysis reduced the complex interrelationships between all variables to six independent major factors in each treatment. The drought tolerance of Brassica napus L. during pre-flowering and post-flowering had a significant positive correlation (r=0.593**). Forty-nine genotypes were clustered into 3 different levels of tolerance in each treatment. Three, 12 and 34 lines were classified as drought tolerant, medium tolerant and sensitive under drought stress during pre-flowering, respectively, however, 4, 29 and 16 under drought stress during post-flowering, respectively. 【Conclusion】 It is feasible to comprehensively evaluate the drought tolerance of Brassica napus L. at the stage of pre-flowing and post-flowering by principal component analysis, clustering analysis and subordinate function analysis which could be used to screen germplasm lines of Brassica napus L. for drought tolerance.

Key words: Brassica napus L. , drought tolerance , screening and identification , principal component analysis , comprehensive evaluation

[1]王汉中. 中国油菜生产抗灾减灾技术手册. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2009.
Wang H Z. Technical Manuals of Disaster Relief of Rapeseed Production in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Science and Technological Press, 2009. (in Chinese)
[2]王贺正, 马  均, 李旭毅, 李  艳, 张荣萍, 汪仁全. 水稻开花期一些生理生化特性与品种抗旱性的关系. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(2): 399-404.
Wang H Z, Ma J, Li X Y, Li Y, Zhang R P, Wang R Q. Relationship between some physiological and biochemical characteristics and drought tolerance at rice flowering stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(2): 399-404. (in Chinese)
[3]武  斌, 李新海, 肖木辑, 谢传晓, 郝转芳, 李明顺, 张世煌. 53份玉米自交系的苗期耐旱性分析. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(4): 665-676.
Wu B, Li X H, Xiao M J, Xie C X, Hao Z F, Li M S, Zhang S H. Genetic variation in fifty-three maize inbred lines in relation to drought tolerance at seedling stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(4): 665-676. (in Chinese)
[4]杨守萍, 陈加敏, 刘  莹, 喻德跃, 盖钧镒. 大豆苗期耐旱性与根系性状的鉴定和分析. 大豆科学, 2005, 24(3): 176-182.
Yang S P, Chen J M, Liu Y, Yu D Y, Gai J Y. Identification and analysis of drought tolerance and root traits of seedling in soybean. Soybean Science, 2005, 24(3): 176-182. (in Chinese)
[5]Kumar A, Singh P, Singh D P, Singh H, Sharma H C. Differences in osmotic regulation in Brassica species. Annals of Botany, 1984, 54: 537-541.
[6]张木清, 陈如凯. 作物抗旱分子生理与遗传改良. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.
Zhang M Q, Chen R K. Molecular Physiological and Genetic Improvement of Crop Drought Tolerance. Beijing: Science Press, 2005. (in Chinese)
[7]周广生, 梅方竹, 周竹青, 朱旭彤. 小麦不同品种耐湿性牛理指标综合评价及其预测. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(11): 1378-1382.
Zhou G S, Mei F Z, Zhou Z Q, Zhu X T. Comprehensive evaluation and forecast on physiological indices of water logging resistance of different wheat varieties. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2003, 36(11): 1378-1382. (in Chinese)
[8]袁志发, 周静芋. 多元统计分析. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
Yuan Z F, Zhou J Y. Multiple Statistics and Analysis. Beijing: Science Press, 2002. (in Chinese)
[9]王贺正, 马  均, 李旭毅, 李  艳, 张荣萍, 刘慧远, 汪仁全. 水稻开花期抗旱性鉴定指标的筛选. 作物学报, 2005, 31(11): 1485-1489.
Wang H Z, Ma J, Li X Y, Li Y, Zhang R P, Liu H Y, Wang R Q. Screening identification indexes of drought resistance at flowering stage in rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2005, 31(11): 1485-1489. (in Chinese)
[10]白志英, 李存东, 孙红春, 赵金锋. 小麦代换系抗旱生理指标的主成分分析及综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(12): 4264-4272.
Bai Z Y, Li C D, Sun H C, Zhao J F. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation on physiological indices of drought resistance in wheat substitution. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(12): 4264-4272. (in Chinese)
[11]徐  蕊, 王启柏, 张春庆, 吴承来. 玉米自交系抗旱性评价指标体系的建立. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(1): 72-84.
Xu R, Wang Q B, Zhang C Q, Wu C L. Drought-resistance evaluation system of maize inbred. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(1): 72-84. (in Chinese)
[12]潘相文, 李文滨, 李艳华, 王国栋, 王光华, 金  剑. 主成分分析在大豆抗旱性评价上的应用. 大豆科学, 2006, 25(4): 379-384.
Pan X W, Li W B, Li Y H, Wang G D, Wang G H, Jin J. Application of principal component analysis on evaluation the drought resistance of soybean genotypes. Soybean Science, 2006, 25(4): 379-384. (in Chinese)
[13]孟庆立, 关周博, 冯佰利, 柴  岩, 胡银岗. 谷子抗旱相关性状的主成分与模糊聚类分析. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(8): 2667-2675.
Meng Q L, Guan Z B, Feng B L, Chai Y, Hu Y G. Principal component analysis and fuzzy clustering on drought-tolerance related traits of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(8): 2667-2675. (in Chinese)
[14]祁旭升, 王兴荣, 许  军, 张建平, 米  君. 胡麻种质资源成株期抗旱性评价. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(15): 3076-3087.
Qi X S, Wang X R, Xu J, Zhang J P, Mi J. Drought-resistance evaluation of flax germplasm at adult plant stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(15): 3076-3087. (in Chinese)
[15]李  震, 杨春杰, 张学昆, 邹崇顺, 程  勇, 郑普英, 李桂英. PEG胁迫下甘蓝型油菜品种(系)种子发芽耐旱性鉴定. 中国油料作物学报, 2008, 30(4): 438-442.
Li Z, Yang C J, Zhang X K, Zou C S, Cheng Y, Zheng P Y, Li G Y. Evaluation of drought tolerance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) during germination under PEG6000 stress. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2008, 30(4): 438-442. (in Chinese)
[16]Kumar A, Singh D P. Use of physiological indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in oilseed Brassica species. Annals of Botany, 1998, 81: 413-420.
[17]Singh R P, Singh D P. Plant water relations as selection criteria for drought tolerance in mustard. Biologia Plantarum (PRAHA), 1988, 30(3): 231-233.
[18]Ma Q F, Sharoniknam R N, Turner D W. Responses of osmotic adjustment and seed yield of Brassica nupus and B. juncea to soil water deficit at different growth stages. Australia Journal of Agricultural Research, 2006, 57: 221-226.
[19]Singh D P, Singh P, Kumar A, Sharma H C. Transpirational cooling as a screening technique for drought tolerance in oilseed Brassicas. Annals of Botany, 1985, 56: 815-820.
[20]张宪政. 作物生理研究法. 北京: 农业出版社, 1992.
Zhang X Z. Methodology of Crop Physiology. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1992. (in Chinese)
[21]唐启义, 冯明光. DPS数据处理系统:实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
Tang Q Y, Feng M G. DPS Data Processing System: Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining. Beijing: Science Press,      2006. (in Chinese)
[22]Fussell L K, Bidinger F R, Bieler P. Crop physiology and breeding for drought tolerance: Research and development. Field Crops Research, 1991, 27(3): 183-199.
[23]Richards R A, Thurling N. Genetic analysis of drought stress response in rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B.napus): III. Physiological characters. Euphytica, 1979, 28: 755-759.
[24]杨春杰, 张学昆, 邹崇顺, 程  勇, 郑普英, 李桂英. PEG-6000模拟干旱胁迫对不同甘蓝型油菜品种萌发和幼苗生长的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2007, 29(4): 425-430.
Yang C J, Zhang X K, Zou C S, Cheng Y, Zheng P Y, Li G Y. Effects of drought simulated by PEG-6000 on germination and seedling growth of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2007, 29(4): 425-430. (in Chinese)
[25]Li Z, Lu G Y, Zhang X K, Zou C S, Cheng Y, Zheng P Y. Improving drought tolerance of germinating seeds by exogenous application of gibberellic acid (GA3) in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Seed Science and Technology, 2010, 38: 432-440.
[26]Wright P R, Morgan J M, Jessop R S, Cass A. Comparative adaptation of canola (Brassica napus) and Indian mustard (B. juncea) to soil water deficits: Yield and yield components. Field Crops Research, 1995, 42: 1-13.
[27]耿站军, 钟  颖, 杨瑞吉. 水分胁迫对不同基因型油菜的生态适应性影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2008, 26(6): 159-162.
Geng Z J, Zhong Y, Yang R J. Eco-adaptable mechanism of water deficiency among genotypes rape. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2008, 26(6): 159-162. (in Chinese)
[28]Hashem A, Majumdar M N A, Hamid A, Hossain M M. Drought stress effects on seed yield, yield attributes, growth, cell membrane stability and gas exchange of synthesized Brassica napus L.. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 1998, 180: 129-136.
[29]Champolivier L, Merrien A. Effects of water stress applied at different growth stages to Brassica napus L. var. oleifera on yield, yield components and seed quality. European Journal of Agronomy, 1996, 5: 153-160.
[30]梁宗锁, 丁钟荣, 王韶唐. 两个油菜种对水分胁迫的适应方式. 西北植物学报, 1992, 12(1): 38-45.
Liang Z S, Ding Z R, Wang S T. Study on types of water stress adaptation in both Brassica napus L.. Acta Botanica Borea1i-Occidentalia Sinica, 1992, 12(1): 38-45. (in Chinese)
[1] WANG YangYang,LIU WanDai,HE Li,REN DeChao,DUAN JianZhao,HU Xin,GUO TianCai,WANG YongHua,FENG Wei. Evaluation of Low Temperature Freezing Injury in Winter Wheat and Difference Analysis of Water Effect Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318.
[2] WANG XiuXiu,XING AiShuang,YANG Ru,HE ShouPu,JIA YinHua,PAN ZhaoE,WANG LiRu,DU XiongMing,SONG XianLiang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Characters of Nature Population in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[3] BIAN NengFei, SUN DongLei, GONG JiaLi, WANG Xing, XING XingHua, JIN XiaHong, WANG XiaoJun. Evaluation of Edible Quality of Roasted Peanuts and Indexes Screening [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 641-652.
[4] SHEN Qian,ZHANG SiPing,LIU RuiHua,LIU ShaoDong,CHEN Jing,GE ChangWei,MA HuiJuan,ZHAO XinHua,YANG GuoZheng,SONG MeiZhen,PANG ChaoYou. Construction of A Comprehensive Evaluation System and Screening of Cold Tolerance Indicators for Cold Tolerance of Cotton at Seedling Emergence Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4342-4355.
[5] DU JinXia,LI YiSha,LI MeiLin,CHEN WenHan,ZHANG MuQing. Evaluation of Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in Different Sugarcane Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130.
[6] HU Xin, ZHANG ZhiLiang, ZHANG Fei, DENG Bo, FANG WeiMin. Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Hybrid Offsprings of Large-Flowered Tea Chrysanthemum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4036-4051.
[7] XU Xiao,REN GenZeng,ZHAO XinRui,CHANG JinHua,CUI JiangHui. Accurate Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation of Panicle Phenotypic Traits of Landraces and Cultivars of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108.
[8] FAN WenJing,LIU Ming,ZHAO Peng,ZHANG QiangQiang,WU DeXiang,GUO PengYu,ZHU XiaoYa,JIN Rong,ZHANG AiJun,TANG ZhongHou. Screening of Sweetpotato Varieties Tolerant to Low Nitrogen at Seedling Stage and Evaluation of Different Nitrogen Efficiencies [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(10): 1891-1902.
[9] LIU QiuYuan,ZHOU Lei,TIAN JinYu,CHENG Shuang,TAO Yu,XING ZhiPeng,LIU GuoDong,WEI HaiYan,ZHANG HongCheng. Comprehensive Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency and Screening of Varieties with High Grain Yield and High Nitrogen Efficiency of Inbred Middle-Ripe Japonica Rice in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1397-1409.
[10] ZHANG Yan,WANG JinSong,DONG ErWei,WU AiLian,WANG Yuan,JIAO XiaoYan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Low-Fertility Tolerance of Different Sorghum Cultivars in Middle-Late-Maturing Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 4954-4968.
[11] ZHAO Rui,ZHANG XuHui,ZHANG ChengYang,GUO JingLei,WANG Yu,LI HongXia. Evaluation and Screening of Nitrogen Efficiency of Wheat Germplasm Resources at Mature Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 3818-3833.
[12] LI Min, SU Hui, LI YangYang, LI JinPeng, LI JinCai, ZHU YuLei, SONG YouHong. Analysis of Heat Tolerance of Wheat with Different Genotypes and Screening of Identification Indexes in Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(16): 3381-3392.
[13] LIU Xing,CAO HongXia,LIAO Yang,ZHOU ChenGuang,LI HuangTao. Effects of Drip Irrigation Methods on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Yield and Irrigation Water Use of Apple [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3264-3278.
[14] YANG Tao,HUANG YaJie,LI ShengMei,REN Dan,CUI JinXin,PANG Bo,YU Shuang,GAO WenWei. Genetic Diversity and Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Traits in Sea-Island Cotton Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(12): 2499-2509.
[15] ZHANG BinBin,CAI ZhiXiang,SHEN ZhiJun,YAN Juan,MA RuiJuan,YU MingLiang. Diversity Analysis of Phenotypic Characters in Germplasm Resources of Ornamental Peaches [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2406-2418.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!