Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (18): 3676-3689.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.18.008

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Influence of Topographic Factors and Ridge Tillage Methods on Soil Nutrients and Fertility Index of Sloping Arable Land in the Black Soil Region

WU Yong1,2(), WEN Xue1, WANG TianShu1, HUANG YanYan1, MENG YiLi1, JIANG HongYu3, BI LiDong2, WU HuiJun1, YAO ShuiHong1()   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-Arid Arable Land in Northern China/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081
    2 College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hehai University, Nanjing 211100
    3 Heilongjiang Hongxing Farm, Bei'an 164022, Heilongjiang
  • Received:2024-11-01 Accepted:2025-02-20 Online:2025-09-18 Published:2025-09-18
  • Contact: YAO ShuiHong

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aimed to investigate the impact of different topographic factors (such as slope position and slope gradient) and ridge tillage methods (such as transverse ridge tillage and longitudinal ridge tillage) on soil nutrient content and fertility indexes of sloping arable land, which would provide a scientific basis for selecting the ridge tillage method and maintaining soil fertility of sloping arable land in this region. 【Method】The study was conducted on a typical long, gentle slope arable land in Hongxing Farm, Bei’an City, Heilongjiang Province. Grid-based sampling was conducted in plots with two different ridge tillage methods (transverse ridge tillage plot, 18 points; longitudinal ridge tillage plot, 11 points). Comparative analysis was carried out to assess the effects of slope position and slope gradient on soil nutrient contents and the Soil Fertility Index (SFI) under the two ridge tillage methods. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the impact of topographic factors, ridge tillage methods, and their interactions on the differences in soil nutrient spatial distribution between the two plots. Finally, variance partitioning analysis (VPA) was used to quantify the contribution of each factor to the explanatory degrees of SFI. 【Result】The differences in soil nutrient content and fertility index between the two plots were significant. The mean values of soil organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, effective phosphorus, and available potassium were all significantly higher in the transverse ridge tillage plot compared with the longitudinal ridge tillage plot. However, the pH value was significantly lower in the transverse plot than that in the longitudinal plot. Consequently, the SFI of the two plots was ranked as follows: transverse ridge tillage>longitudinal ridge tillage (P<0.05). Slope position and slope gradient significantly influenced the spatial distribution of soil nutrients in plots with different ridge tillage methods, resulting in significant differences in the explanatory degree of each influencing factors on SFI variation between the two plots. In the transverse ridge tillage plot, the slope gradient differences caused by the micro-terrain (explanatory degrees, 32.62%) were the main drivers of soil nutrient differentiation. In this plot, soil total and effective phosphorus decreased as the slope increasing. In the longitudinal ridge tillage plot, soil organic matter, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus were the highest at the middle slope, and soil organic matter, total nitrogen, total potassium, effective phosphorus, and available potassium initially decreased and then increased with rising slope. In this plot, the slope position (explanatory degrees, 6.81%) and slope gradient (explanatory degrees, 7.22%) influence the distribution of soil nutrients. A comprehensive analysis of the SFI across the entire slope surface revealed that ridge tillage method had the highest explanatory degrees for the spatial variation of SFI (15.46%), followed by slope position (9.54%). The combined explanatory degree of the interaction between ridge tillage method and the two topographic factors, slope gradient and slope position, was 9.49%. 【Conclusion】Topographic factors played a key role in soil nutrient migration in sloping arable land, and the impact of each factor (slope gradient and slope position) varied significantly under different ridge tillage methods. In transverse ridge tillage, slope differences caused by internal micro-terrain helped retain soil nutrients, while in longitudinal ridge tillage, slope gradient and slope position influenced the spatial differentiation of soil nutrients. Across the entire slope surface, the contribution of ridge tillage method to the spatial variation in soil fertility was greater than that of topographic factors. Therefore, the management of black soil sloping farmland needed to consider the combined effects of ridge tillage methods and topography.

Key words: black soil region, topographic factors, ridge tillage methods, soil nutrients, soil fertility index

Fig. 1

Soil sample points and slope gradient distribution"

Table 1

Grading standards for soil nutrient indicators in arable land"

指标 Indicator
酸碱度 pH 6.5-7.5 5.5-6.5 or 7.5-8.5 <5.5 or >8.5 / / /
有机质 Organic matter (g·kg-1) >40 30-40 20-30 10-20 6-10 <6
全氮 Total nitrogen (g·kg-1) >2 1.5-2 1-1.5 0.75-1 0.5-0.75 <0.5
全磷 Total phosphorus (g·kg-1) >1 0.8-1 0.6-0.8 0.4-0.6 0.2-0.4 <0.2
全钾 Total potassium (g·kg-1) >25 20-25 15-20 10-15 5-10 <5
碱解氮 Alkaline decomposition nitrogen (mg·kg-1) >150 120-150 90-120 60-90 30-60 <30
有效磷 Effective phosphorus (mg·kg-1) >40 20-40 10-20 5-10 3-5 <3
速效钾 Quick-acting potassium (mg·kg-1) >200 150-200 100-150 50-100 30-50 <30

Fig. 2

Effect of slope position on soil nutrient Different uppercase letters indicate that the differences of indicator between slope positions within the same ridge tillage methods have reached a significant level (P<0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate that the differences of indicator between ridge tillage methods within the same slope position have reached a significant level (P<0.05). The same as below. “*” Different tillage methods show significant differences (P<0.05) in soil indicators, “**” Different tillage methods show an extremely significant difference (P<0.01) in soil indicators, “ns” the difference is not significant"

Fig. 3

Effect of slope gradient on soil nutrient The numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 represent slope grades: Grade 1 (0-0.40°), Grade 2 (>0.40-1.10°), Grade 3 (>1.10-2.88°), Grade 4 (>2.88-3.86°), and Grade 5 (>3.86-5.06°)"

Table 2

Nutrient status of transverse and longitudinal ridge tillage soil"

指标
Indicator
含量范围 Content range 变异系数 CV (%) 均值+标准误差 Mean+SE
横坡垄作
Transverse
ridge
顺坡垄作
Longitudinal ridge
横坡垄作
Transverse ridge
顺坡垄作
Longitudinal ridge
横坡垄作
Transverse ridge
顺坡垄作
Longitudinal ridge
酸碱度 pH 4.8-6.1 5.0-6.2 4.92 5.76 5.4±0.03b 5.7±0.06a
有机质 Soil organic matter (g·kg-1) 43.07-142.64 27.57-83.70 31.19 26.29 68.65±2.76a 59.26±2.71b
全氮 Total nitrogen(g·kg-1) 1.82-5.29 1.37-3.95 28.19 25.55 3.17±0.12a 2.83±0.13b
全磷 Total phosphorus (g·kg-1) 0.73-1.77 0.65-1.58 22.22 22.08 1.18±0.03a 1.06±0.04b
全钾 Total potassium (g·kg-1) 13.32-18.09 13.23-18.58 6.43 9.18 16.27±0.14a 15.69±0.25b
碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen (mg·kg-1) 17.92-469.63 33.12-126.87 88.60 32.74 86.98±9.95a 72.96±4.16a
有效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg-1) 12.48-175.05 21.37-60.19 67.57 31.90 47.64±4.16a 36.84±2.05b
速效钾 Available potassium (mg·kg-1) 112.63-574.28 141.32-285.80 31.91 22.24 219.85±9.06a 183.86±7.12b

Fig. 4

Frequency distribution of soil nutrient levels in transverse and longitudinal ridge tillage"

Fig. 5

The influence of slope position, slope gradient, and their interaction on soil fertility index"

Fig. 6

Difference in soil fertility index under different ridge tillage methods (A) and importance of various indicators to the SFI (B) In Figure A, different lowercase letters indicate that the differences in SFI between different ridge tillage methods have reached a significant level (P<0.05)"

Table 3

Effects of topographic factors, monopoly practices and their interaction on soil nutrients in sloping croplands"

指标
Indication
坡度
Slope
gradient
坡位
Slope position
垄作方式
Ridge tillage methods
坡度×坡位
Slopegradient× slope positions
坡度×垄作方式
Slope gradient×
ridge tillage methods
坡位×垄作方式
Slope positions×
ridge tillage methods
坡度×坡位×垄作方式
Slope gradient×
Slope positions×Ridge tillage methods
酸碱度 pH 0.383 0.319 * 0.372 0.121 0.357 0.335
有机质 Soil organic matter 0.768 0.798 0.105 0.373 0.964 0.136 0.530
全氮 Total nitrogen 0.723 0.981 0.206 0.384 0.885 0.215 0.733
全磷 Total phosphorus 0.584 0.990 0.179 0.291 0.812 0.151 0.744
全钾 Total potassium 0.489 0.565 0.539 0.910 0.483 0.418 0.543
碱解氮Alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen 0.912 0.488 0.663 0.952 0.751 0.867 0.368
有效磷 Available phosphorus ** * 0.334 * 0.238 0.977 *
速效钾 Available potassium ** ** * ** * 0.640 0.908

Fig. 7

Explanatory degree of topographic factors, ridge tillage methods, and their interaction on the variation of SFI Figure (a) represents the explanatory degree of slope gradient, slope position, and their interaction on the variation of SFI under transverse ridge tillage conditions; Figure (b) shows the explanatory degree of slope gradient, slope position, and their interaction on the variation of SFI under longitudinal ridge tillage conditions; Figure (c) shows the explanatory degree of topographic factors, ridge tillage methods, and their interaction on the variation of SFI. ( Explanatory degree≤0 is not displayed)"

[1]
梁爱珍, 李禄军, 祝惠. 科技创新推进黑土地保护与利用, 齐力维护国家粮食安全: 用好养好黑土地的对策建议. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(5): 557-564.
LIANG A Z, LI L J, ZHU H. Protection and utilization of black land and making concerted and unremitting efforts for safeguarding food security promoted by sci-tech innovation: Countermeasures in conservation and rational utilization of black land. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(5): 557-564. (in Chinese)
[2]
李保国, 刘忠, 黄峰, 杨晓光, 刘志娟, 万炜, 汪景宽, 徐英德, 李子忠, 任图生. 巩固黑土地粮仓保障国家粮食安全. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(10): 1184-1193.
LI B G, LIU Z, HUANG F, YANG X G, LIU Z J, WAN W, WANG J K, XU Y D, LI Z Z, REN T S. Ensuring national food security by strengthening high-productivity black soil granary in Northeast China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(10): 1184-1193. (in Chinese)
[3]
水利部中国科学院中国工程院. 中国水土流失防治与生态安全-东北黑土区卷. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
Ministry of Water Resources. Chinese Academy of Sciences. Chinese Academy of Engineering. Chinese Soil Erosion and Ecological Security:Northeast Black Soil Volume. Beijing: Science Press, 2010. (in Chinese)
[4]
张兴义, 刘晓冰. 中国黑土研究的热点问题及水土流失防治对策. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(4): 340-344.
ZHANG X Y, LIU X B. Key issues of mollisols research and soil erosion control strategies in China. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(4): 340-344. (in Chinese)
[5]
AN J, ZHENG F L, LU J, LI G F. Investigating the role of raindrop impact on hydrodynamic mechanism of soil erosion under simulated rainfall conditions. Soil Science, 2012, 177(8): 517-526.
[6]
XIONG J F, WU H Y, WANG X R, MA R H, LIN C. Response of soil fertility to soil erosion on a regional scale: A case study of Northeast China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 434: 140360.
[7]
宁静, 王婷, 刘佳会, 张鑫宇, 李哲. 东北典型黑土区土壤养分的空间分布特征及影响因素: 以黑龙江省宾县为例. 西安理工大学学报, 2021, 37(3): 301-310.
NING J, WANG T, LIU J H, ZHANG X Y, LI Z. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of soil nutrients in typical black soil region of Northeast China: Taking Binxian County of Heilongjiang Province as an example. Journal of Xi’an University of Technology, 2021, 37(3): 301-310. (in Chinese)
[8]
李超, 李文峰. 高原耕地土壤养分空间分布与影响因子相关性研究. 土壤通报, 2014, 45(5): 1113-1118.
LI C, LI W F. Study on the relations between the spatial distribution of plateau cultivated soil nutrients and impact factors. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2014, 45(5): 1113-1118. (in Chinese)
[9]
王磊, 何超, 郑粉莉, 边锋, 覃超, 徐锡蒙. 黑土区坡耕地横坡垄作措施防治土壤侵蚀的土槽试验. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(15): 141-148.
WANG L, HE C, ZHENG F L, BIAN F, QIN C, XU X M. Soil-Bin experiment on effects of contour ridge tillage for controlling hillslope soil erosion in black soil region. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(15): 141-148. (in Chinese)
[10]
盖浩, 刘平奇, 张梦璇, 陈柏旭, 王迎春, 王立刚. 黑土坡耕地横坡垄作对减少径流及土壤有机碳流失的作用. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(2): 300-304, 311.
GAI H, LIU P Q, ZHANG M X, CHEN B X, WANG Y C, WANG L G. Effects of ridge planting on reducing runoff and soil organic carbon loss in black soil slope. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(2): 300-304, 311. (in Chinese)
[11]
李雪亮, 张晴雯, 李孟妮, 石玉龙, 于博威, 荆雪锴, 蒋嫄可, 刘国成. 黑土长缓坡地形与横垄对土壤有机碳空间分异的交互作用. 农业工程学报, 2024, 40(3): 103-113.
LI X L, ZHANG Q W, LI M N, SHI Y L, YU B W, JING X K, JIANG Y K, LIU G C. Interaction between long gently sloping topography and contour-ridge on the spatial partitioning of soil organic carbon in a black soil. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2024, 40(3): 103-113. (in Chinese)
[12]
HOU T Y, FILLEY T R, TONG Y N, ABBAN B, SINGH S, THANOS PAPANICOLAOU A N, WACHA K M, WILSON C G, CHAUBEY I. Tillage-induced surface soil roughness controls the chemistry and physics of eroded particles at early erosion stage. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 207: 104807.
[13]
翟星雨, 张兴义, 李浩, 鄂丽丽, 陈帅, 甄怀才, 谷思玉. 田块尺度顺坡垄作改等高垄作提高黑土有机质含量. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(19): 155-161.
ZHAI X Y, ZHANG X Y, LI H, E L L, CHEN S, ZHEN H C, GU S Y. Improving mollisols organic matter content as downslope tillage replaced by contour tillage in field scale. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(19): 155-161. (in Chinese)
[14]
陆淑宁, 李荣融, 姚冲, 吴发启. 横坡垄作对坡耕地产流产沙及氮磷养分流失过程影响研究. 土壤学报, 2024, 61(5): 1271-1283.
LU S N, LI R R, YAO C, WU F Q. Study on the effects of counter tillage on runoff and sediment yield and process of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient loss on sloping farmland. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2024, 61(5): 1271-1283. (in Chinese)
[15]
杨子, 刘晓光, 宁静, 董芳辰, 于杰, 张鹏, 王赛. 典型黑土垄作区耕地沟蚀对土壤养分的影响研究. 土壤, 2017, 49(2): 379-385.
YANG Z, LIU X G, NING J, DONG F C, YU J, ZHANG P, WANG S. Effects of gully erosion on soil nutrients in ridge area of typical black soil. Soils, 2017, 49(2): 379-385. (in Chinese)
[16]
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[17]
中国土壤调查办公室. 全国第二次土壤普查养分分级标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1979.
China Soil Survey Office. National Second Soil Survey Nutrient Classification Standards. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1979. (in Chinese)
[18]
RAHMANIPOUR F, MARZAIOLI R, BAHRAMI H A, FEREIDOUNI Z, BANDARABADI S R. Assessment of soil quality indices in agricultural lands of Qazvin Province, Iran. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 40: 19-26.
[19]
张汪寿, 李晓秀, 黄文江, 李建辉, 任万平, 高中灵. 不同土地利用条件下土壤质量综合评价方法. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(12): 311-318.
ZHANG W S, LI X X, HUANG W J, LI J H, REN W P, GAO Z L. Comprehensive assessment methodology of soil quality under different land use conditions. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26(12): 311-318. (in Chinese)
[20]
DENG X J, XU X L, WANG S H. The tempo-spatial changes of soil fertility in farmland of China from the 1980s to the 2010s. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 146: 109913.
[21]
杨维鸽, 郑粉莉, 王占礼, 韩勇. 地形对黑土区典型坡面侵蚀—沉积空间分布特征的影响. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(3): 572-581.
YANG W G, ZHENG F L, WANG Z L, HAN Y. Effects of topography on spatial distribution of soil erosion and deposition on hillslope in the typical of black soil region. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2016, 53(3): 572-581. (in Chinese)
[22]
耿华杰, 郑粉莉, 赵录友, 王伦, 赵婷, 秦琪珊, 安小兵. 降雨、汇流和坡度对黑土浅沟坡面侵蚀影响的试验研究. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(2): 57-67, 75.
GENG H J, ZHENG F L, ZHAO L Y, WANG L, ZHAO T, QIN Q S, AN X B. An experimental study on effects of rainfall, inflow and slope gradient on ephemeral gully slope erosion in Chinese mollisol region. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 38(2): 57-67, 75. (in Chinese)
[23]
王小康, 谷举, 刘刚, 师宏强. 横、顺坡垄作对黑土坡面侵蚀-沉积周期规律的影响. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(2): 430-439.
WANG X K, GU J, LIU G, SHI H Q. The influence of transverse and longitudinal ridge tillage on soil erosion and deposition cycles for mollisol slope. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022, 59(2): 430-439. (in Chinese)
[24]
KUHN N J, HOFFMANN T, SCHWANGHART W, DOTTERWEICH M. Agricultural soil erosion and global carbon cycle: Controversy over? Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2009, 34(7): 1033-1038.
[25]
李林源, 高磊, 彭新华, 钱芮, 王建茜, 杜豪. 典型水蚀区坡耕地黑土质量的空间分异特征及影响因素. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(3): 382-390, 399.
LI L Y, GAO L, PENG X H, QIAN R, WANG J X, DU H. Spatial variation characteristics and influencing factors of black soil quality in typical water-eroded sloping cropland. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 38(3): 382-390, 399. (in Chinese)
[26]
王涵, 赵怡凯, 陈祥伟, 付玉. 降雨强度和坡度对黑土坡耕地团聚体流失特征的影响. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(1): 11-17.
WANG H, ZHAO Y K, CHEN X W, FU Y. Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on the characteristics of soil aggregate loss in black soil sloping field. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(1): 11-17. (in Chinese)
[27]
AN J, WU Y Z, WU X Y, WANG L Z, XIAO P Q. Soil aggregate loss affected by raindrop impact and runoff under surface hydrologic conditions within contour ridge systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021, 209: 104937.
[28]
WANG L, ZHENG F L, ZHANG X J, WILSON G V, QIN C, HE C, LIU G, ZHANG J Q. Discrimination of soil losses between ridge and furrow in longitudinal ridge-tillage under simulated upslope inflow and rainfall. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020, 198: 104541.
[29]
汪景宽, 徐香茹, 裴久渤, 李双异. 东北黑土地区耕地质量现状与面临的机遇和挑战. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(3): 695-701.
WANG J K, XU X R, PEI J B, LI S Y. Current situations of black soil quality and facing opportunities and challenges in Northeast China. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2021, 52(3): 695-701. (in Chinese)
[30]
沈海鸥, 温磊磊, 武佳龙, 王宇. 垄作与垄向区田技术对黑土区坡耕地土壤侵蚀影响的研究进展. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(22): 52-62.
SHEN H O, WEN L L, WU J L, WANG Y. Review on the effects of ridge pattern and ridge-furrow intervals on soil erosion of sloping farmland in the black soil region. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(22): 52-62. (in Chinese)
[31]
杨世琦, 邢磊, 刘宏元, 韩瑞芸, 杨正礼. 松干流域不同种植模式对坡耕地土壤氮磷流失的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(3): 61-69.
YANG S Q, XING L, LIU H Y, HAN R Y, YANG Z L. Effect of planting patterns on soil nitrogen and phosphorus loss in slope farmland in the main Songhua river basin. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 46(3): 61-69. (in Chinese)
[32]
WANG Y X, XU Y Y, YANG H Y, SHEN H B, ZHAO L, ZHU B G, WANG J X, GUO L F. Effect of slope shape on soil aggregate stability of slope farmland in black soil region. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2023, 11: 1127043.
[1] LUO YiNuo, LI YanFei, LI WenHu, ZHANG SiQi, MU WenYan, HUANG Ning, SUN RuiQing, DING YuLan, SHE WenTing, SONG WenBin, LI XiaoHan, SHI Mei, WANG ZhaoHui. Iron Concentrations in Grain and Its Different Parts of Newly Developed Wheat Varieties (Lines) in China and Influencing Factors [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(3): 416-430.
[2] LUO YuHong, HUANG YuShu, ZHU Na, LI Le, CHENG YanBin, LIU JiaHui, ZHANG JingMin, BAO YuFan, XU Nuo, YAN YuChun. Effects of Cultivation and Cropland Afforestation on Soil Particle- Size Distribution and Soil Nutrients in the Typical Steppe of Xilingol League [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(24): 4919-4932.
[3] LI HaiPeng, DU WuYan, WU HanQian, ZHANG Jie, MENG HuiSheng, HONG JianPing, XU MingGang, HAO XianJun, GAO WenJun. Different Manures Affect Soil Nutrients and Bacterial Community Structure in Mining Reclamation Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(16): 3207-3219.
[4] SU HaiLan, ZHU YanMing, CHEN Hong, NIU YuQing, ZHENG MeiXia, ZHU YuJing. Effects of Different Intercropping Methods on Mesona Chinesis Quality and Its Rhizosphere Soil Characteristic [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(14): 2755-2770.
[5] WANG QingYang, CAO DianYun, WANG Di, ZHAN ZengYi, HE WanYing, SUN Qiang, CHEN WenFu, LAN Yu. Effects of Long-Term Application of Biochar on Nutrients, Fractions of Humic in Brown Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(13): 2612-2622.
[6] BU MingNa, YANG XiWen, TENG ZhengKai, HU NaiYue, ZHANG Shuo, WANG ChunYan, YANG Jian, LIANG WenXian, MA WenQi, HE DeXian, ZHOU SuMei. Effects of Layered Fertilization Under Different Irrigation Conditions on Vertical Distribution of Soil Nutrients and Root Growth and Function of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(11): 2125-2142.
[7] YU BoWei, ZHANG QingWen, HAO Zhuo, SHI YuLong, LI XueLiang, LI MengNi, JING XueKai. Interaction Between Transverse Ridge Tillage and Topography on Soil Erodibility Along the Long Gentle Slope in a Typical Black Soil Region of Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(23): 4706-4716.
[8] ZHOU Ying, YANG Peng, WANG LiGang, LEI QiuLiang, ZHANG YaNan. Optimization Path of the Ecological Compensation Mechanism for Conservation Tillage in the Northeast Black Soil Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(22): 4478-4489.
[9] SUN Tao, FENG XiaoMin, GAO XinHao, DENG AiXing, ZHENG ChengYan, SONG ZhenWei, ZHANG WeiJian. Effects of Diversified Cropping on the Soil Aggregate Composition and Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen Content [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(15): 2929-2940.
[10] ZHENG ChunYu, SHA ShanYi, ZHU Lin, WANG ShaoJie, FENG GuoZhong, GAO Qiang, WANG Yin. Optimizing Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate for High-Yield Maize in Black Soil Region Based on Ecological and Social Benefits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(11): 2129-2140.
[11] GAO JiaRui, FANG ShengZhi, ZHANG YuLing, AN Jing, YU Na, ZOU HongTao. Characteristics of Organic Nitrogen Mineralization in Paddy Soil with Different Reclamation Years in Black Soil of Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1579-1588.
[12] JIN YuTing,LIU YunFeng,HU HongXiang,MU Jing,GAO MengYao,LI XianFan,XUE ZhongJun,GONG JingJing. Effects of Continuous Straw Returning with Chemical Fertilizer on Annual Runoff Loss of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Rice-Rape Rotation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1937-1951.
[13] ZHAO Peng,LIU Ming,JIN Rong,CHEN XiaoGuang,ZHANG AiJun,TANG ZhongHou,WEI Meng. Effects of Long-Term Application of Organic Fertilizer on Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation and Distribution of Sweetpotato in Fluvo- Aquic Soil Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(10): 2142-2153.
[14] YIN SiJia,LI Hui,XU ZhiQiang,PEI JiuBo,DAI JiGuang,LIU YuWei,LI AiMeng,YU YaXi,LIU Wei,WANG JingKuan. Spatial Variations and Relationships of Topsoil Fertility Indices of Drylands in the Typical Black Soil Region of Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(10): 2132-2141.
[15] REN Tao,GUO LiXuan,ZHANG LiMei,YANG XuKun,LIAO ShiPeng,ZHANG YangYang,LI XiaoKun,CONG RiHuan,LU JianWei. Soil Nutrient Status of Oilseed Rape Cultivated Soil in Typical Winter Oilseed Rape Production Regions in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1606-1616.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!