Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (5): 919-934.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.05.008

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Localized Nitrogen Supply on Plant Growth and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Maize Seedling Under Drought Stress

WANG Yu(), ZHANG YuPeng, ZHU GuanYa, LIAO HangXi, HOU WenFeng, GAO Qiang, WANG Yin()   

  1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Straw Comprehensive Utilization and Black Soil Conservation, Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Sustainable Utilization of Soil Resources in the Commodity Grain Bases in Jilin Province, Changchun 130118
  • Received:2023-03-25 Accepted:2023-05-04 Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-03-06
  • Contact: WANG Yu, WANG Yin

Abstract:

【Objective】Frequent spring drought and excessive application of nitrogen (N) fertilizer would hinder maize seedling growth and development, and may negatively affect plant growth during middle-late periods and final grain yield. This study was conducted to determine the effects of localized supply of N fertilizer on maize seedling growth, root morphology, water and N utilization under drought stress conditions, ait of nitrogen inputs on graming to provide a technical basis for promoting root development, improving water and N use efficiencies, and achieving high and stable yields in maize production.【Method】The split-root pot experiments with different water and N levels were conducted in 2021 and 2022. Five N supply patterns were designed: no N supply (N0/N0), uniform low N supply (LN/LN), localized low N supply (LN/N0), uniform high N supply (HN/HN), and localized high N supply (HN/N0). The N rates were 0.12 and 0.24 g N·kg-1 dry soil for LN and HN levels, respectively. Water management was initiated from 3-leaf stage and lasted for 3 weeks, including three soil moisture content: severe water-stress (35% of field capacity, W0), moderate water-stress (55% of field capacity, W1), and well-watered conditions (75% of field capacity, W2). At the end of the water management period, plant growth traits, shoot dry matter (DM), shoot N uptake, root DM, root length, and water and N use efficiency (WUE, NUE) were measured. 【Result】 The water stress significantly limited plant growth, DM accumulation, and N uptake in maize seedlings, but increased root shoot ratio. Compared with W2, the total root length under W0 was reduced by 48.0%, while the effects were relatively less under W1. The water stress reduced NUE in maize, with average decreases of 10.1 and 4.6 percentage points under W0 and W1, respectively, compared to W2, and the WUE was decreased by 19.4% under W0 and increased by 11.9% under W1. The N supply patterns also significantly affected plant growth, DM accumulation, N uptake and utilization in maize seedlings, and the two factors of water and nitrogen showed significant interaction. Based on the results obtained in 2022, the highest shoot DM was observed in LN/LN, and which were 8.3%, 12.6% and 23.6% higher than those in N0/N0 under W0, W1 and W2, respectively. Nevertheless, the highest root DM was observed in LN/N0, with the increases of 9.5%, 17.0%, and 31.2% higher than that in N0/N0 under the three water levels. Moreover, the LN/N0 increased significantly root﹕shoot ratio under both W1 and W2. The HN/HN had the most severe negative impacts on maize seedling growth, with 30.1%, 14.6%, and 7.0% lower shoot DM as compared with N0/N0 under W0, W1 and W2, respectively. The larger decreases in root DM (41.0%, 44.2% and 34.9%, respectively) were observed in HN/HN, thus resulting in significant reductions in root﹕shoot ratio. The HN/N0 showed a relatively less effect on shoot DM, but significantly reduced root DM and root﹕shoot ratio. Compared with N0/N0, both HN/HN and HN/N0 resulted in significant decreases in root length, whereas LN/N0 significantly increased total root length by promoting root proliferation on the side without N supply. The application of N fertilizer significantly increased plant N uptake, with higher value in LN/LN but lower in LN/N0 across all water levels. With regard to NUE, which was higher in LN/LN while lower in HN/HN. The differences in N uptake and NUE among treatments increased with reducing water stress levels. Both plant water consumption and WUE were higher in LN/LN and LN/N0, followed by HN/N0, whereas the lowest values were observed in HN/HN. Compared with N0/N0, uniform or localized low N supply showed promoting effects on maize seedling growth, while uniform or localized high N supply had negative effects that intensified with increasing water stress levels. Overall, localized N supply had a greater effect on root growth relative to uniform N supply, inducing a morphological plasticity response in the root system. The correlation analysis results indicated that shoot DM, WUE and NUE had positive and significant relationships with total root length of maize seedlings across different water levels and N supply patterns. For the localized N supply treatments, the correlation between root length on the side without N supply and shoot DM, WUE and NUE was higher.【Conclusion】In comparison to uniform N supply, the localized N supply effectively promoted root proliferation on the side without N supply during maize seedling stage, resulting in increased root DM and total root length. Hence, the localized supply with a lower N rate was recommended to enhance drought tolerance of maize seedlings and improve WUE.

Key words: localized nitrogen supply, drought stress, maize seedling, root growth, split root cultivation, water and nitrogen utilization

Fig. 1

Diagram of the split-root culture system"

Fig. 2

Experimental treatment diagram"

Table 1

Effects of different water and nitrogen treatments on plant growth at maize seedling stage"

土壤水分
Soil water condition
供氮方式
N supply pattern
2021 2022
株高
Plant height (cm)
茎粗
Stem diameter (mm)
叶片SPAD
Leaf SPAD
株高
Plant height (cm)
茎粗
Stem diameter (mm)
叶片SPAD
Leaf SPAD
W0 N0/N0 67.4a 24.1a 46.1b 74.0ab 22.0a 43.3c
LN/LN 79.6a 22.6a 45.5b
LN/N0 74.7ab 22.9a 44.1bc
HN/HN 58.8b 20.4b 50.9a 68.4c 19.7b 48.0a
HN/N0 64.1a 22.9ab 48.8ab 72.9bc 20.8ab 46.7ab
W1 N0/N0 92.1a 34.0a 43.7b 102.2ab 36.1b 36.4c
LN/LN 104.4a 38.8a 41.5ab
LN/N0 100.0ab 37.4ab 40.1b
HN/HN 83.5b 32.7a 48.6a 96.7b 36.8ab 44.1a
HN/N0 89.4ab 35.4a 45.9ab 101.4ab 37.7ab 43.2a
W2 N0/N0 100.6a 36.8a 42.5b 106.7b 40.6b 37.2c
LN/LN 115.7a 43.9a 40.3ab
LN/N0 111.6ab 43.2a 38.5bc
HN/HN 98.8a 36.5a 45.4a 107.7b 41.9ab 42.2a
HN/N0 103.5a 38.1a 45.3a 112.5ab 42.3ab 40.8ab
方差分析 ANOVA
水分 W <0.01** <0.01** <0.01** <0.01** <0.01** <0.01**
氮素 N <0.01** 0.044* <0.01** <0.01** <0.01** <0.01**
水分×氮素 W×N 0.289 ns 0.549 ns 0.890 ns 0.835 ns 0.524 ns <0.01**

Fig. 3

Effects of different water and nitrogen treatments on shoot dry matter, root dry matter and root shoot ratio at maize seedling stage Within a same soil water condition, the different letters above the vertical columns indicate the significant difference between N treatments (P<0.05). The same as below"

Fig. 4

Effects of different water and nitrogen treatments on root length and its distribution at maize seedling stage In the ANOVA results, ** indicate the effect is significant at P<0.01 levels. In the figures of root length distribution, within a same side, the different letters beside the horizontal columns indicate the difference is significant between N treatments (P<0.05). The percentage labeled beside the root length in B side for the localized N supply treatment indicates the relative change value of root length in the side without N supply, as compared to the average root length of both sides for the uniform N supply treatment. A side with N supply, B side without N supply"

Fig. 5

Effects of different water and nitrogen treatments on shoot nitrogen uptake and nitrogen recovery efficiency at maize seedling stage"

Fig. 6

Effects of different water and nitrogen treatments on plant water consumption and water use efficiency at maize seedling stage"

Fig. 7

Relationship between plant dry matter, water and nitrogen use efficiency and total root length of maize seedlings under different water and nitrogen conditions in 2022"

Fig. 8

Relationships between plant dry matter, water and nitrogen use efficiency of maize plants and the root length in different sides for localized nitrogen supply treatments under different water and nitrogen conditions in 2022"

Table 2

Effect of nitrogen supply methods on the correlation between shoot dry matter, water and nitrogen use efficiency and root length of maize seedlings under different water conditions in 2022"

土壤水分
Soil water
condition
全部处理总根长
Total root length in
all N treatments (n=60)
均匀供氮总根长
Total root length in
uniform N treatments (n=36)
局部供氮总根长
Total root length in
localized N treatments (n=24)
供氮一侧根长
Root length in the side
with N supply in localized N treatments (n=24)
不供氮一侧根长
Root length in the side without N supply in localized N treatments (n=24)
地上部干重与根长的相关关系 Relationships between shoot dry matter (g/plant) and root length (m)
W0 y=0.1108x+6.7259
R2=0.752**
y=0.135x+5.9617
R2=0.861**
y=0.0751x+8.0753
R2=0.614*
y=0.1488x+9.0182
R2=0.599**
y=0.139x+7.4805
R2=0.576*
W1 y=0.0553x+15.243
R2=0.556**
y=0.0848x+13.296
R2=0.710**
y=0.0333x+17.004
R2=0.487*
y=0.0693x+17.57
R2=0.501*
y=0.0616x+16.628
R2=0.454*
W2 y=0.0673x+20.093
R2=0.580**
y=0.0984x+17.668
R2=0.710**
y=0.0359x+23.072
R2=0.547*
y=0.0854x+23.337
R2=0.610*
y=0.0598x+22.997
R2=0.486*
水分利用效率与根长的相关关系 Relationships between water use efficiency (g·L-1) and root length (m)
W0 y=0.0153x+2.1425
R2=0.708**
y=0.017x+2.0916
R2=0.746**
y=0.0129x+2.2265
R2=0.649**
y=0.0244x+2.4096
R2=0.574*
y=0.0251x+2.0915
R2=0.667**
W1 y=0.0055x+3.1778
R2=0.694**
y=0.0056x+3.1614
R2=0.739**
y=0.0051x+3.242
R2=0.572*
y= 0.0099x+3.3503
R2=0.524*
y=0.0099x+3.1551
R2=0.595**
W2 y=0.0067x+2.7533
R2=0.696**
y=0.0078x+2.6482
R2=0.839**
y=0.0051x+2.928
R2=0.509*
y=0.0114x+2.9994
R2=0.492*
y=0.0091x+2.8848
R2=0.512*
氮素回收利用率与根长的相关关系 Relationships between nitrogen recovery efficiency (%) and root length (m)
W0 y=0.1044x+1.21
R2=0.464**
y=0.1394x-0.1692
R2=0.721**
y=0.037x+4.3722
R2=0.072ns
y=0.0511x+5.2085
R2=0.034ns
y=0.0885x+3.4954
R2=0.113ns
W1 y= 0.09x+5.9841
R2=0.613**
y=0.1078x+3.8694
R2=0.724**
y=0.0472x+10.917
R2=0.372ns
y=0.099x+11.682
R2=0.391ns
y=0.0863x+10.436
R2=0.340ns
W2 y=0.1003x+8.5723
R2=0.438**
y=0.2071x+1.6676
R2=0.933**
y=0.0132x+15.741
R2=0.045ns
y=0.0319x+15.822
R2=0.051ns
y= 0.0218x+15.73
R2=0.039ns
[1]
LIU Z J, HUBBARD K G, LIN X M, YANG X G. Negative effects of climate warming on maize yield are reversed by the changing of sowing date and cultivar selection in Northeast China. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19(11): 3481-3492.

doi: 10.1111/gcb.12324 pmid: 23857749
[2]
LI C L, WANG Y, LI Y X, ZHU L, CAO Y Q, ZHAO X H, FENG G Z, GAO Q. Mixture of controlled-release and normal urea to improve nitrogen management for maize across contrasting soil types. Agronomy Journal, 2020, 112(4): 3101-3113.

doi: 10.1002/agj2.v112.4
[3]
王缘怡, 李晓宇, 王寅, 张馨月, 冯国忠, 焉莉, 李翠兰, 高强. 吉林省农户玉米种植与施肥现状调查. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(9): 262-271.
WANG Y Y, LI X Y, WANG Y, ZHANG X Y, FENG G Z, YAN L, LI C L, GAO Q. Smallholder investigation on current maize cultivation and fertilization in Jilin Province. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(9): 262-271. (in Chinese)
[4]
WANG Y, ZHANG X Y, CHEN J, CHEN A J, WANG L Y, GUO X Y, NIU Y L, LIU S R, MI G H, GAO Q. Reducing basal nitrogen rate to improve maize seedling growth, water and nitrogen use efficiencies under drought stress by optimizing root morphology and distribution. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 212: 328-337.

doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.010
[5]
LI Y X, CHEN J, TIAN L B, SHEN Z Y, AMBY D B, LIU F L, GAO Q, WANG Y. Seedling-stage deficit irrigation with nitrogen application in three-year field study provides guidance for improving maize yield, water and nitrogen use efficiencies. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022, 11(21): 3007.
[6]
李玉玺, 王语, 张渝鹏, 朱冠亚, 高强, 王寅. 苗期干旱胁迫和施氮对东北风沙土玉米生长、产量及氮素利用的影响. 吉林农业大学学报. https://doi.org/10.13327/j.jjlau.2021.1821.
LI Y X, WANG Y, ZAHNG Y P, ZHU G Y, GAO Q, WANG Y. Effects of seedling-drought stress and nitrogen application on maize plant growth, grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency on aeolian sandy soil in Northeast China. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University. https://doi.org/10.13327/j.jjlau.2021.1821. (in Chinese)
[7]
徐昆, 朱秀芳, 刘莹, 郭锐, 陈令仪. 气候变化下干旱对中国玉米产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(11): 149-158.
XU K, ZHU X F, LIU Y, GUO R, CHEN L Y. Effects of drought on maize yield under climate change in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(11): 149-158. (in Chinese)
[8]
李小凡, 邵靖宜, 于维祯, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 张吉旺, 任佰朝. 高温干旱复合胁迫对夏玉米产量及光合特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(18): 3516-3529. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.18.004.
LI X F, SHAO J Y, YU W Z, LIU P, ZHAO B, ZHANG J W, REN B Z. Combined effects of high temperature and drought on yield and photosynthetic characteristics of summer maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3516-3529. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.18.004. (in Chinese)
[9]
ZHOU G Y, ZHOU X H, NIE Y Y, BAI S H, ZHOU L Y, SHAO J J, CHENG W S, WANG J W, HU F Q, FU Y L. Drought-induced changes in root biomass largely result from altered root morphological traits: evidence from a synthesis of global field trials. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2018, 41(11): 2589-2599.
[10]
SHARP R E, POROYKO V, HEJLEK L G, SPOLLEN W G, SPRINGER G K, BOHNERT H J, NGUYEN H T. Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomics. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2004, 55(407): 2343-2351.

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh276 pmid: 15448181
[11]
LI G H, ZHAO B, DONG S T, ZHANG J W, LIU P, LU W P. Controlled-release urea combining with optimal irrigation improved grain yield, nitrogen uptake, and growth of maize. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 227: 105834.

doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105834
[12]
CHEN J, WANG P, MA Z M, LYU X D, LIU T T, SIDDIQUE K H M. Optimum water and nitrogen supply regulates root distribution and produces high grain yields in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under permanent raised bed tillage in arid northwest China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018, 181: 117-126.

doi: 10.1016/j.still.2018.04.012
[13]
张馨月, 王寅, 陈健, 陈安吉, 王莉颖, 郭晓颖, 牛雅郦, 张星宇, 陈利东, 高强. 水分和氮素对玉米苗期生长、根系形态及分布的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(1): 34-44. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.01.004.
ZHANG X Y, WANG Y, CHEN J, CHEN A J, WANG L Y, GUO X Y, NIU Y L, ZHANG X Y, CHEN L D, GAO Q. Effects of soil water and nitrogen on plant growth, root morphology and spatial distribution of maize at the seedling stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(1): 34-44. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.01.004. (in Chinese)
[14]
LYNCH J P. Root phenotypes for improved nutrient capture: An underexploited opportunity for global agriculture. The New Phytologist, 2019, 223(2): 548-564.

doi: 10.1111/nph.2019.223.issue-2
[15]
LYNCH J P. Root biology in the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. Annals of Botany, 2021, 128(1): i-ii.
[16]
LYNCH J P. Harnessing root architecture to address global challenges. The Plant Journal: for Cell and Molecular Biology, 2022, 109(2): 415-431.

doi: 10.1111/tpj.v109.2
[17]
SHEN J B, LI C J, MI G H, LI L, YUAN L X, JIANG R F, ZHANG F S. Maximizing root/rhizosphere efficiency to improve crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency in intensive agriculture of China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(5): 1181-1192.

doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers342 pmid: 23255279
[18]
ZHANG H, FORDE B G. An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. Science, 1998, 279(5349): 407-409.

doi: 10.1126/science.279.5349.407
[19]
LI H B, ZHANG F S, SHEN J B. Contribution of root proliferation in nutrient-rich soil patches to nutrient uptake and growth of maize. Pedosphere, 2012, 22(6): 776-784.

doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(12)60063-0
[20]
HODGE A, ROBINSON D, GRIFFITHS B S, FITTER A H. Nitrogen capture by plants grown in N-rich organic patches of contrasting size and strength. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1999, 50(336): 1243-1252.

doi: 10.1093/jxb/50.336.1243
[21]
HODGE A, STEWART J, ROBINSON D, GRIFFITHS B S, FITTER A H. Spatial and physical heterogeneity of N supply from soil does not influence N capture by two grass species. Functional Ecology, 2000, 14(5): 645-653.

doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.t01-1-00470.x
[22]
FARLEY R A, FITTER A H. Temporal and spatial variation in soil resources in a deciduous woodland. Journal of Ecology, 1999, 87(4): 688-696.

doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00390.x
[23]
JING J Y, ZHANG F S, RENGEL Z, SHEN J B. Localized fertilization with P plus N elicits an ammonium-dependent enhancement of maize root growth and nutrient uptake. Field Crops Research, 2012, 133: 176-185.

doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04.009
[24]
MA Q H, ZHANG F S, RENGEL Z, SHEN J B. Localized application of NH4+-N plus P at the seedling and later growth stages enhances nutrient uptake and maize yield by inducing lateral root proliferation. Plant and Soil, 2013, 372(1/2): 65-80.

doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1735-8
[25]
YU P, WHITE P J, LI C J. New insights to lateral rooting: differential responses to heterogeneous nitrogen availability among maize root types. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2015, 10(10): e1013795.
[26]
JING J Y, GAO W, CHENG L Y, WANG X, DUAN F Y, YUAN L X, RENGEL Z, ZHANG F S, LI H G, CAHILL J F, SHEN J B. Harnessing root-foraging capacity to improve nutrient-use efficiency for sustainable maize production. Field Crops Research, 2022, 279: 108462.

doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108462
[27]
CHEN Z, REN W, YI X, LI Q, CAI H G, ALI F, YUAN L X, MI G H, PAN Q C, CHEN F J. Local nitrogen application increases maize post-silking nitrogen uptake of responsive genotypes via enhanced deep root growth. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2023, 22(1): 235-250.

doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2022.07.003
[28]
LI X Y, WANG Y, FENG G Z, XU Z, MENG F C, GAO Q. Differential fertilizer nitrogen fates in maize cropping system among three soil textures based on 15N. Field Crops Research, 2023, 291: 108780.

doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108780
[29]
TENORIO F A M, MCLELLAN E L, EAGLE A J, CASSMAN K G, ANDERSEN D, KRAUSNICK M, OAKLUND R, THORBURN J, GRASSINI P. Benchmarking impact of nitrogen inputs on grain yield and environmental performance of producer fields in the western US Corn Belt. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020, 294: 106865.
[30]
MI G H, CHEN F J, WU Q P, LAI N W, YUAN L X, ZHANG F S. Ideotype root architecture for efficient nitrogen acquisition by maize in intensive cropping systems. Science China Life Sciences, 2010, 53(12): 1369-1373.

doi: 10.1007/s11427-010-4097-y
[31]
CAI F, ZHANG Y S, MI N, MING H Q, ZHANG S J, ZHANG H, ZHAO X L. Maize (Zea mays L.) physiological responses to drought and rewatering, and the associations with water stress degree. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 241: 106379.

doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106379
[32]
GUO Y F, CHEN F J, ZHANG F S, MI G H. Auxin transport from shoot to root is involved in the response of lateral root growth to localized supply of nitrate in maize. Plant Science, 2005, 169(5): 894-900.

doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.06.007
[33]
LI H B, WANG X, RENGEL Z, MA Q H, ZHANG F S, SHEN J B. Root over-production in heterogeneous nutrient environment has no negative effects on Zea mays shoot growth in the field. Plant and Soil, 2016, 409(1): 405-417.

doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-2963-5
[34]
YU P, LI X X, YUAN L X, LI C J. A novel morphological response of maize (Zea mays) adult roots to heterogeneous nitrate supply revealed by a split-root experiment. Physiologia Plantarum, 2014, 150(1): 133-144.

doi: 10.1111/ppl.2014.150.issue-1
[35]
HODGE A. Plastic plants and patchy soils. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2006, 57(2): 401-411.

doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri280 pmid: 16172138
[36]
CUI Z L, YUE S C, WANG G L, MENG Q F, WU L, YANG Z P, ZHANG Q, LI S Q, ZHANG F S, CHEN X P. Closing the yield gap could reduce projected greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of maize production in China. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19(8): 2467-2477.

doi: 10.1111/gcb.12213 pmid: 23553871
[37]
王寅, 冯国忠, 张天山, 茹铁军, 袁勇, 高强. 控释氮肥与尿素混施对连作春玉米产量、氮素吸收和氮素平衡的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(3): 518-528. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.03.010.
WANG Y, FENG G Z, ZHANG T S, RU T J, YUAN Y, GAO Q. Effects of mixed application of controlled-release N fertilizer and common urea on grain yield, N uptake and soil N balance in continuous spring maize production. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(3): 518-528. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.03.010. (in Chinese)
[38]
米国华, 伍大利, 陈延玲, 夏婷婷, 冯国忠, 李前, 石东峰, 苏效坡, 高强. 东北玉米化肥减施增效技术途径探讨. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(14): 2758-2770. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.14.013.
MI G H, WU D L, CHEN Y L, XIA T T, FENG G Z, LI Q, SHI D F, SU X P, GAO Q. The ways to reduce chemical fertilizer input and increase fertilizer use efficiency in maize in northeast China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(14): 2758-2770. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.14.013. (in Chinese)
[1] ZHANG Ying, SHI TingRui, CAO Rui, PAN WenQiu, SONG WeiNing, WANG Li, NIE XiaoJun. Genome-Wide Association Study of Drought Tolerance at Seedling Stage in ICARDA-Introduced Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1658-1673.
[2] HAN RuiFeng, GUO YuQin, WANG YuZhuo, CHENG YongSan, HOU LeiPing, ZHANG Yi. Effect of Nitrogen Form on Root Growth, pH in Root Zones and Cell Wall Components of Pakchoi [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(11): 2215-2226.
[3] BU MingNa, YANG XiWen, TENG ZhengKai, HU NaiYue, ZHANG Shuo, WANG ChunYan, YANG Jian, LIANG WenXian, MA WenQi, HE DeXian, ZHOU SuMei. Effects of Layered Fertilization Under Different Irrigation Conditions on Vertical Distribution of Soil Nutrients and Root Growth and Function of Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(11): 2125-2142.
[4] LI Han, JIANG ShangTao, PENG HaiYing, LI PeiGen, GU ChangYi, ZHANG JinLian, CHEN TingSu, XU YangChun, SHEN QiRong, DONG CaiXia. Effects of Inoculation with Indigenous and Exogenous Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Drought Resistance of Pyrus betulaefolia and Its Adaptation Mechanism [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(1): 159-172.
[5] WANG RongRong, CHEN TianPeng, YIN HaoJie, JIANG GuiYing. Response and Drip Irrigation Re-Watering Compensation Effect of Spring Wheat Roots to Drought Stress with Different Drought Tolerance Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(24): 4826-4841.
[6] HU Sheng,LI YangYang,TANG ZhangLin,LI JiaNa,QU CunMin,LIU LieZhao. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of the Changes in Oil Content and Protein Content Under Drought Stress in Brassica napus L. [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 17-30.
[7] DONG SangJie,JIANG XiaoChun,WANG LingYu,LIN Rui,QI ZhenYu,YU JingQuan,ZHOU YanHong. Effects of Supplemental Far-Red Light on Growth and Abiotic Stress Tolerance of Pepper Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1189-1198.
[8] LI Ning,LIU Kun,LIU TongTong,SHI YuGang,WANG ShuGuang,YANG JinWen,SUN DaiZhen. Identification of Wheat Circular RNAs Responsive to Drought Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(23): 4583-4599.
[9] LIU Hao,PANG Jie,LI HuanHuan,QIANG XiaoMan,ZHANG YingYing,SONG JiaWen. Effects of Foliar-Spraying Selenium Coupled with Soil Moisture on the Yield and Quality of Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4433-4444.
[10] LI Gang, BAI Yang, JIA ZiYing, MA ZhengYang, ZHANG XiangChi, LI ChunYan, LI Cheng. Phosphorus Altered the Response of Ionomics and Metabolomics to Drought Stress in Wheat Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 280-294.
[11] RU Chen,HU XiaoTao,LÜ MengWei,CHEN DianYu,WANG WenE,SONG TianYuan. Effects of Nitrogen on Nitrogen Accumulation and Distribution, Nitrogen Metabolizing Enzymes, Protein Content, and Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Winter Wheat Under Heat and Drought Stress After Anthesis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3303-3320.
[12] GAO RenCai, CHEN SongHe, MA HongLiang, MO Piao, LIU WeiWei, XIAO Yun, ZHANG Xue, FAN GaoQiong. Straw Mulching from Autumn Fallow and Reducing Nitrogen Application Improved Grain Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Winter Wheat by Optimizing Root Distribution [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2709-2725.
[13] MENG Yu,WEN PengFei,DING ZhiQiang,TIAN WenZhong,ZHANG XuePin,HE Li,DUAN JianZhao,LIU WanDai,FENG Wei. Identification and Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Wheat Varieties Based on Thermal Infrared Image [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2538-2551.
[14] ZHU FangFang,DONG YaHui,REN ZhenZhen,WANG ZhiYong,SU HuiHui,KU LiXia,CHEN YanHui. Over-expression of ZmIBH1-1 to Improve Drought Resistance in Maize Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4500-4513.
[15] XUE RenFeng,FENG Ming,HUANG YuNing,Matthew BLAIR,Walter MESSIER,GE WeiDe. Effects of PvEG261 Gene on the Fusarium Wilt and Drought- Resistance in Common Bean [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4274-4285.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!