不同砧木对欧亚种葡萄‘丹娜’果实类黄酮物质的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.10.011

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Flavonoids are important metabolites of wine grapes, which have important effects on the qualities of the grape fruits and their wines. In this study, the effects of different rootstocks on the physicochemical parameters and flavonoid substances of Tannat (Vitis vinifera L.) grapes were studied to provide the theoretical basis for the selection and utilization of rootstocks.【Method】In the present research, Tannat shoots were used as scions and were greenwood grafted on four different kinds of rootstocks, including 1103P, 101-14, SO4, and Beta. On the bases of the analysis of the basic physicochemical parameters (total soluble solid content, titratable acid, pH, and 100-berry weights) of the commercial mature grape berries of these grapevines grafted on different rootstocks, the compositions and contents of the flavonoids in the corresponding grape berries were detected by using high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS), in the three vintages of 2016, 2017 and 2019.【Result】 The rootstocks had little effect on the 100-berry weights of the Tannat grapes; the contents of the total soluble solids were higher in the combination of Tannat/101-14, as well as the own-rooted Tannat; the titratable acids of the grape juice of the Tannat/101-14 and the Tannat/Beta combinations were higher than the own-rooted Tannat grapes. In the part of flavonoids, the contents of anthocyanins and flavonols in the Tannat/SO4 combination was the lowest in all of these combinations; the concentrations of anthocyanins and flavonols in the Tannat/101-14 combination and the own-rooted Tannat were higher than those of other combinations; the concentrations of flavanols in the skins of the Tannat/101-14 combination was higher. In addition, the concentrations of anthocyanins and flavonols in the Tannat/ 11103P combination was lower, but the content of flavanols in the skins of the Tannat/1103P combination was relatively high. Besides, the results of two-factor ANOVA of the year and the rootstock showed that the rootstocks had significant effects on all types of anthocyanins. All the four rootstocks showed a tendency of reducing the anthocyanins of peonidin, petunitin, malvidin, non-acylation, acetylation and coumaric acylation. In the mature fruits, the quercetins were the most abundant flavonols, followed by myricetins, while syringetins and laricitrins accounted for a smaller proportion. Rootstocks had a significant effect on the myricetins and laricitrins, which reduced the contents of myricetin and laricitrin to different degrees. Through the establishment of OPLS-DA (Orthogonal Partial Least Squares Discrimination Analysis) model, it was found that the Tannat/101-14 combination was mainly distinguished by the malvidin anthocyanin compared with the own-rooted grapes. The main difference compounds of Tannat/Beta combination were anthocyanins of malvidin, delphinidin and acetylation, the total flavanols and quercetin compounds. The difference compounds of the Tannat/SO4 combination were anthocyanins of malvidin, delphinidin, acetylation, and quercetins. The Tannat/1103P combination mainly consisted of acetylated anthocyanins and quercetins.【Conclusion】 In Beijing region, all the four rootstocks (1103P, SO4, Beta, and 101-14) showed a tendency of reducing the flavonoid concentrations, including anthocyanins of peonidin, petunitin, malvidin, non-acylation, acetylation, coumaric acylation quercetins, and laricitrins. The rootstock '101-14' was beneficial to the accumulation of anthocyanins, flavonols and flavanols in fruit skins, which was conducive to the improvement of the wine quality, so it was recommended to be used. However, Tannat grapes grafted with SO4 had less flavonoid accumulation, which was not recommended to be used.

Key words: wine grape, Tannat, rootstock, flavonoid, high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS)

HAN Xiao, YANG HangYu, CHEN WeiKai, WANG Jun, HE Fei. Effects of Different Rootstocks on Flavonoids of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tannat Grape Fruits[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(10): 2013-2025.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig. 1

Table 1

Table 2

Anthocyanin compositions and contents (mg∙kg-1 FW) in Tannat grape of different rootstock combinations"

砧穗组合 Rootstock combination	年份 Vintage	非酰化 Non-acylation	乙酰化 Acetylation	香豆酰化 Coumaric acylation	咖啡酰化 Coffee acylation	甲基花青素类 Peonidins	甲基花翠素类 Petunitins	二甲花翠素类 Malvidins	花青素类 Cyanidins	花翠素类 Delphinidins	总花色苷 Total anthocyanins
T	2016	567.12±139.77a	226.47±51.21a	235.9±34.35bc	1.39±0.38b	87.04±29.02ab	200.43±48.12a	641.07±104.17a	32.86±14.82ab	69.48±25.45ab	1030.87±216.9a
	2017	744.74±36.87a	358.3±10.43a	502.04±3.38a	7.77±0.14a	238.58±7.59a	106.67±2.18a	1050.69±26.49a	151.62±2.5a	65.28±3.81a	1612.85±46.94a
	2019	981.51±54.3a	346.17±4.59a	346.83±15.31a	4.67±0.17a	229.49±6.21a	218.40±18.91a	1086.04±30a	39.95±1.38a	105.3±9.58a	1679.19±60.84a
T/101-14	2016	382.79±139.68ab	185.84±43.46ab	225.76±64.57bc	1.31±0.48b	71.89±36.35b	112.61±23.33c	535.12±162.66ab	30.48±11.95ab	45.6±13.15bcd	795.69±245.93ab
	2017	650.91±46.56b	347.08±29.75a	408.52±14.47b	8.06±0.19a	230.26±2.34a	104.25±13.05a	863.18±50.28b	142.86±14.03a	74.04±11.29a	1414.57±128.66ab
	2019	763.85±21.62b	289.28±8.46b	240.05±12.72b	4.53±0.25a	187.63±3.89b	186.13±17.55b	791.98±17.53c	35.07±1.19b	96.89±5.77a	1297.72±41.12b
T/1103P	2016	414.15±87.4ab	199.18±26.56ab	322.87±40.13a	2.29±0.27a	70.65±14.82b	134.30±39.18bc	668.78±67.63a	27.43±3.74ab	37.33±9.14cd	938.49±116.35ab
	2017	488.72±13.71cd	268.82±10.32bc	329.47±25.82c	4.58±0.91b	152.45±14.86b	86.18±1.2b	697.44±20.56cd	105.19±5.95b	50.33±0.58b	1091.59±57.64c
	2019	748.87±11.12b	240.79±3.92d	327.25±3.56a	3.92±0.07b	195.68±4.59b	149.59±3.9c	899.87±0.99b	22.12±2.64c	53.58±0.41c	1320.84±5.81b
T/Beta	2016	500.06±27.41ab	242.14±3.8a	268.68±9.5ab	1.51±0.07b	85.88±2.82ab	186.78±7.08ab	654.81±25.5a	24.71±0.38ab	60.21±1.42abc	1012.40±36.82a
	2017	433.32±51.44de	223.84±33.39d	305.85±42.22c	4.43±1.02b	116.11±17.34cd	60.01±5.99d	679.16±91.75cd	79.94±4.31c	32.24±9.68c	967.44±182.54c
	2019	736.9±49.46b	271.7±13.42c	272.86±49.41b	3.83±0.25b	178.17±15.64b	158.60±10.16c	859.6±69.26bc	23.49±2.49c	65.43±2.14b	1285.29±98.21b
T/SO4	2016	304.25±93.14b	134.6±53.44b	179.64±53.49c	1.08±0.45b	54.39±20.36b	106.37±31.17c	407.89±128.36b	16.5±5.14b	34.42±15.66d	619.57±199.89b
	2017	365.24±36.5e	233.93±32.01cd	304.02±38.52c	2.85±0.45b	94.78±16.91d	71.22±5.91cd	633.98±77.88d	72.86±6.94c	33.2±0.16c	906.03±152c
	2019	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
年份 Vintages		ns	***	***	***	ns	***	***	***	***	**
砧木 Rootstock		**	*	**	***	**	***	*	***	**	**
年份×砧木 Vintages × Rootstock		*	*	**	***	**	***	*	***	ns	*

Table 2

Table 3

Flavonol compositions and concentrations (mg∙kg-1 FW) in Tannat grape of different rootstock combinations"

砧穗组合 Rootstock combination	年份 Vintage	杨梅酮类 Myricetins	山奈酚类 Kaempferols	槲皮素类 Quercetins	西伯利亚落叶松黄酮 Laricitrins	丁香亭类 Syringetins	异鼠李素 Isorhamnetins	总黄酮醇 Total flavonol concentrations
T	2016	14.37±3.69ab	6.12±0.98b	78.08±10.65ab	7.17±0.82b	7.42±0.54ab	3.08±0.8bcd	116.24±14.77ab
	2017	25±1.62a	15.82±1.12a	90.41±4.00a	8.49±0.22abc	9.28±1.06a	4.23±0.67a	152.06±10.01a
	2019	22.37±1.03a	5.66±1.78a	105.79±4.83a	5.49±0.48a	1.44±0.04a	16.92±0.34b	157.66±5.85a
T/101-14	2016	13.72±5.02ab	8.25±2.67ab	67.32±28.75ab	8.51±1.94ab	9.84±2.98ab	2.51±0.54cd	110.15±40.6ab
	2017	21.25±0.88b	14.04±0.95a	75.08±1.51b	8.26±0.16abc	8.17±0.04ab	4.18±0.20a	131.51±4.53ab
	2019	23.38±0.15a	5.16±0.20a	105.4±1.01a	5.08±0.3ab	1.24±0.08b	20.46±0.55a	160.71±0.27a
T/1103P	2016	13.94±2.45ab	8.72±1.00ab	68.88±13.68ab	8.69±1.02ab	11.46±2.42a	2.12±0.61d	113.81±15.92ab
	2017	15.04±1.04c	8.91±0.69b	59.95±3.71c	7.61±0.25bc	8.24±0.16ab	3.93±0.11ab	102.78±7.66cd
	2019	17.07±0.42b	6±0.32a	93.14±2.62b	4.61±0.23bc	1.16±0.04bc	14.73±0.05d	136.71±2.29b
T/Beta	2016	15.61±0.83ab	10.28±0.26ab	81.42±1.82a	10.96±0.63a	10.79±1.07a	4±0.32ab	133.07±2.02a
	2017	10.99±0.30e	6.81±0.30c	58.57±3.34c	7.34±0.55c	8.91±0.58a	2.93±0.15c	96.38±7.09cd
	2019	16.41±2.88b	4.48±0.24a	71.42±7.14c	4.23±0.41c	1.07±0.06c	15.63±0.56c	113.23±11.16c
T/SO4	2016	10.83±5.76b	6.59±3.31b	47.94±11.96b	5.871.72b	7.82.01ab	2.06±0.81d	81.11±25.12b
	2017	12.13±1.54de	9.41±1.64b	46.41±5.91d	7.19±0.92c	8.44±1.6ab	3.49±0.27b	85.17±16.14d
	2019	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA
年份 Vintage		ns	ns	**	***	ns	ns	ns
砧木 Rootstock		ns	*	**	**	ns	ns	ns
年份×砧木 Vintages × Rootstocks		**	ns	**	**	ns	*	ns

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 2

Table 5

References 40

[1]	BASHIR S, KAUR N, ARORA N K. Dynamics of partitioning of major sugars, total phenols and flavonoids in the juice of seven wine grape (Vitis spp.) cultivars during different stages of berry development. Plant Physiology Reports, 2019, 24(1): 112-118. doi: 10.1007/s40502-018-0409-1. doi: 10.1007/s40502-018-0409-1
[2]	GOUOT J C, SMITH J P, HOLZAPFEL B P, WALKER A R, CELIA B. Grape berry flavonoids: A review of their biochemical responses to high and extreme high temperatures. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2018, 70(2): 397-423. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery392
[3]	TANAKA T, IUCHI A, HARADA H, HASHIMOTO S. Potential beneficial effects of wine flavonoids on allergic diseases. Diseases, 2019, 7(1): 8-8. doi: 10.3390/diseases7010008. doi: 10.3390/diseases7010008
[4]	GEORGIEV V, ANANGA A, TSOLOVA V. Recent advances and uses of grape flavonoids as nutraceuticals. Nutrients, 2014, 6(1): 391-415. doi: 10.3390/nu6010391. doi: 10.3390/nu6010391
[5]	张欣珂, 赵旭, 成池芳, 齐梦瑶, 石英. 葡萄酒中的酚类物质I: 种类、结构及其检测方法研究进展. 食品科学, 2019, 40(15): 255-268. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180916-159. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180916-159
	ZHANG X K, ZHAO X, CHENG C F, QI M Y, SHI Y. Phenolics in wines I: A review of categories, structures and detection methods. Food Science, 2019, 40(15): 255-268. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180916-159. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20180916-159
[6]	SOMKUWAR R G, BHANGE M A, OULKAR D P, SHARMA A K, AHAMMED SHABEER T P. Estimation of polyphenols by using HPLC-DAD in red and white wine grape varieties grown under tropical conditions of India. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2018, 55(12): 4994-5002. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3438-x. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3438-x
[7]	YUE Q Y, XU L L, XIANG G G, YU X, YAO Y X. Characterization of gene expression profile, phenolic composition, and antioxidant capacity in red-fleshed grape berries and their wines. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2018, 66(27): 7190-7199. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01323
[8]	MELNYK C W, MEYEROWITZ E M. Plant grafting. Current Biology, 2015, 25(5): 183-188.
[9]	CARRASCO-QUIROZ M, MARTÍNEZ-GIL A M, GUTIÉRREZ-GAMBOA G, Y MORENO-SIMUNOVI C. Effect of rootstocks on volatile composition of Merlot wines. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2020, 100(8): 3517-3524. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10395. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10395
[10]	SAVOI S, EITLE M W, BERGER H, CURTO M, MEIMBERG H, GRIESSER M, FORNECK A. Comparative transcriptome analysis of two root-feeding grape Phylloxera (D. vitifoliae) lineages feeding on a rootstock and V. vinifera. Insects, 2020, 11(10): 691. doi: 10.3390/insects11100691
[11]	BLANCQUAERT E H, OBERHOLSTER A, RICARDO-DA-SILVA J M, DELOIRE A J. Effects of abiotic factors on phenolic compounds in the grape Nerry-A review. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2019, 40(1): 1-14.
[12]	綦伟, 厉恩茂, 翟衡, 王晓芳, 杜远鹏, 谭皓. 部分根区干旱对不同砧木嫁接玛瓦斯亚葡萄生长的影响. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(4): 794-799. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2007.04.020. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2007.04.020
	QI W, LI E M, ZHAI H, WANG X F, DU Y P, TAN H. Effects of partial rootzone drying on the growth of Vitis vinifera cv. malvasia grafted on varied rootstocks. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(4): 794-799. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2007.04.020. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2007.04.020
[13]	WALKER R R, BLACKMORE D H, CLINGELEFFER P R, HOLT H, PEARSON W, FRANCIS I L. Effect of rootstock on yield, grape composition and wine sensory attributes of Shiraz grown in a moderately saline environment. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2019, 25(4): 414-429. doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12409. doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12409
[14]	SUAREZ D L, CELIS N, ANDERSON R G, SANDHU D. Grape rootstock response to salinity, water and combined salinity and water stresses. Agronomy, 2019, 9(6): 321. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9060321. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9060321
[15]	GUTIÉRREZ-GAMBOA G, CARRASCO-QUIROZ M, MARTÍNEZ- GIL A M, PÉREZ-ÁLVAREZ E P, GARDE-CERDÁN T, MORENO-SIMUNOVIC Y. Grape and wine amino acid composition from Carignan noir grapevines growing under rainfed conditions in the Maule Valley, Chile: Effects of location and rootstock. Food Research International, 2018, 105: 344-352. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.021. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.021
[16]	崔鹏飞, 魏灵珠, 程建徽, 向江, 李明山, 吴江. 不同砧木对天工翠玉葡萄生长和果实品质的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33(1): 52-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.07. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.07
	CUI P F, WEI L Z, CHENG J H, XIANG J, LI M S, WU J. Effects of different rootstocks on growth and fruit quality of Tiangong Cuiyu grape. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33(1): 52-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.07. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.01.07
[17]	白世践, 户金鸽, 蔡军社, 赵荣华, 陈光. 砧木对极端干旱区马瑟兰葡萄光合及酿酒特性的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(3): 129-137. doi: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2021.03.015. doi: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2021.03.015
	BAI S J, HU J G, CAI J S, ZHAO R H, CHEN G. Effects of rootstocks on photosynthesis and vinification characteristics of Marselan grape in extreme arid region. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 49(3): 129-137. doi: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2021.03.015. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2021.03.015
[18]	韩晓, 王海波, 王孝娣, 冀晓昊, 史祥宾, 王宝亮, 郑晓翠, 王志强, 刘凤之. 不同砧木对‘87-1’葡萄光合特性及荧光特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(10): 1972-1981. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.10.016. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.10.016
	HAN X, WANG H B, WANG X D, JI X H, SHI X B, WANG B L, ZHENG X C, WANG Z Q, LIU F Z. Effects of different rootstocks on ‘87-1’ grape photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(10): 1972-1981. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.10.016. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.10.016
[19]	KOUNDOURAS S, HATZIDIMITRIOU E, KARAMOLEGKOU M, DIMOPOULOU E, KALLITHRAKA S, TSIALTAS J T. Irrigation and rootstock effects on the phenolic concentration and aroma potential of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon grapes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2009, 57: 7805-7813. doi: 10.1021/jf901063a
[20]	JENSEN P J, MAKALOWSKA I, ALTMAN N, FAZIO G, PRAUL C, MAXIMOVA S N, CRASSWELLER R M, TRAVIS J W, MCNELLIS T W. Rootstock-regulated gene expression patterns in apple tree scions. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2010, 6(1): 57-72. doi: 10.1007/s11295-009-0228-7. doi: 10.1007/s11295-009-0228-7
[21]	HOOVER E E, HEMSTAD P, LARSON D, MACKENZIE J, PROPSOM F. Rootstock influence on scion vigor, hardiness, yield, and fruit composition of St. Pepin grape. Acta Horticulturae, 2004, 640: 201-206.
[22]	SOMKUWAR R G, SATISHA J, RAMTEKE S D, SHARMA J. Effect of rootstocks and pre-harvest treatments on storage life of Thompson seedless grapes. Acta Horticulturae, 2008, 785(785): 441-446. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2008.785.58. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2008.785.58
[23]	VRSIC S, PULKO B, KOCSIS L. Factors influencing grafting success and compatibility of grape rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 2015, 181: 168-173. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.10.058
[24]	JIN Z X, SUN H, SUN T Y, WANG Q J, YAO Y X. Modifications of ‘Gold Finger’ grape berry quality as affected by the different rootstocks. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2016, 64(21): 4189-4197. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00361. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00361
[25]	LI M M, GUO Z J, JIA N, YUAN J W, HAN B, YIN Y G, SUN Y, LIU C J, ZHAO S J. Evaluation of eight rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of ‘Marselan’ grapevines. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 248: 58-61. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.12.050. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.12.050
[26]	DE SOUZA LEÃO P, DE MELO CHAVES A R. Training systems and rootstocks on yield and agronomic performance of ‘Syrah’ grapevine in the Brazilian semiarid. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 2019, 43. doi: 10.1590/1413-7054201943005719. doi: 10.1590/1413-7054201943005719
[27]	WANG Y, CHEN W K, GAO X T, HE L, YANG X H, HE F, DUAN C Q, WANG J. Rootstock-mediated effects on Cabernet Sauvignon performance: Vine growth, berry ripening, flavonoids, and aromatic profiles. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(2): 401. doi: 10.3390/ijms20020401
[28]	GUTIÉRREZ-GAMBOA G, GÓMEZ-PLAZA E, BAUTISTA-ORTÍN A B, GARDE-CERDÁN T, MORENO-SIMUNOVIC Y, MARTÍNEZ- GIL A M. Rootstock effects on grape anthocyanins, skin and seed proanthocyanidins and wine color and phenolic compounds from Vitis vinifera L. Merlot grapevines. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2019, 99(6): 2846-2854. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9496
[29]	NEDELKOVSKI D, CVETKOVIĆ J, BELESKI K, POPOSKA H. Phenolic composition of Vranec grapevine cultivar (Vitis vinifera L.) grafted on different rootstock. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 2017, 23(3): 389-395.
[30]	HARBERTSON J F, KELLER M. Rootstock effects on deficit- irrigated wine grapes in a dry climate: grape and wine composition. American journal of enology and viticulture, 2012, 63(1): 40-48. doi: 10.5344/ajev.2011.11079
[31]	DOWNEY M O, MARICA M, KRSTIC M P. Development of a stable extract for anthocyanins and flavonols from grape skin. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2007, 58(3): 358-364.
[32]	胡丽, 彭文婷, 卢浩成, 王军. 不同酿酒葡萄果实类黄酮及香气物质差异分析. 食品科学, 2020, 41(14): 225-233. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190625-310. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190625-310
	HU L, PENG W T, LU H C, WANG J. Analysis on differences in flavonoids and aroma compounds of different wine grape varieties. Food Science, 2020, 41(14): 225-233. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190625-310. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190625-310
[33]	李敏敏, 袁军伟, 刘长江, 韩斌, 黄家珍, 郭紫娟, 赵胜建. 砧木对河北昌黎产区赤霞珠葡萄生长和果实品质的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1): 59-63. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201601.003. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201601.003
	LI M M, YUAN J W, LIU C J, HAN B, HUANG J Z, GUO Z J, ZHAO S J. Effects of rootstocks on the growth and berry quality of Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon grapevine in Changli zone, Hebei Province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(1): 59-63. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201601.003. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201601.003
[34]	华晓雨, 陶爽, 孙盛楠, 郭娜, 阎秀峰, 蔺吉祥. 植物次生代谢产物-酚类化合物的研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2017, 33(12): 22-29. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2017-0546. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2017-0546
	HUA X Y, TAO S, SUN S N, GUO N, YAN X F, LIN J X. Research progress on phenolic compounds of plant secondary metabolites. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2017, 33(12): 22-29. doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2017-0546. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2017-0546
[35]	GRASSI D, AGGIO A, ONORI L, CROCE G, TIBERTI S, FERRI C, FERRI L, DESIDERI G. Tea, flavonoids, and nitric oxide-mediated vascular reactivity. The Journal of Nutrition, 2008, 138(8): 1554-1560. doi: 10.1093/jn/138.8.1554S. doi: 10.1093/jn/138.8.1554S
[36]	HE F, MU L, YAN G L, LIANG N N, PAN Q H, WANG J, REEVES M J, DUAN C Q. Biosynthesis of anthocyanins and their regulation in colored grapes. Molecules, 2010, 15(12): 9057. doi: 10.3390/MOLECULES15129057. doi: 10.3390/MOLECULES15129057
[37]	SURIANO S, ALBA V, DI GENNARO D, SURIANO M S, SAVINO M, TARRICONE L. Genotype/rootstocks effect on the expression of anthocyanins and flavans in grapes and wines of Greco Nero n.(Vitis vinifera L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 2016, 209: 309-315. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.07.004
[38]	MIJOWSKA K, OCHMIAN I, OSZMIAŃSKI J. Rootstock effects on polyphenol content in grapes of ‘Regent’cultivated under cool climate condition. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality, 2017, 90: 159-164.
[39]	JOGAIAH S, OULKAR D P, BANERJEE K, SHARMA J, PATIL A G, MASKE S R, SOMKUWAR R G. Biochemically induced variations during some phenological stages in Thompson seedless grapevines grafted on different rootstocks. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 2016, 34(1): 36-45. doi: 10.21548/34-1-1079. doi: 10.21548/34-1-1079
[40]	MARASCO R, ROLLI E, FUSI M, MICHOUD G, DAFFONCHIO D. Grapevine rootstocks shape underground bacterial microbiome and networking but not potential functionality. Microbiome, 2018, 6(1): 3. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0391-2. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0391-2

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

砧穗组合 Rootstock combination	年份 Vintage	T	T/101-14	T/1103P	T/Beta	T/SO4
百粒重 100-berries weight (g)	2016	180.99±17.99a	180.07±21.08a	206.68±16.30a	171.37±7.80a	208.68±20.27a
	2017	179.90±1.73a	177.68±9.11a	165.63±3.12ab	159.25±1.19bc	174.92±2.30ab
	2019	187.97±5.23a	186.7±6.77a	174.71±3.38b	175.73±4.36b	NA
可溶性固形物 Total soluble solids (°Brix)	2016	20.43±0.25a	19.93±0.60ab	18.32±1.21b	19.90±0.57ab	17.67±1.36b
	2017	17.05±0.07b	18.30±0.14a	16.75±0.07b	14.65±0.07c	17.15±0.07b
	2019	22.1±0.26a	22±0.1a	20.07±0.21b	19.4±0.1c	NA
pH	2016	3.17±0.03ab	3.23±0.05ab	3.12±0.07b	3.27±0.11a	3.12±0.09b
	2017	2.94±0.01b	3.07±0.01a	2.95±0.01b	2.87±0.20c	2.92±0.02dc
	2019	3.26±0.03b	3.26±0.06b	3.41±0.04a	2.93±0.1c	NA
可滴定酸 Titratableacid (g∙L^-1)	2016	9.63±1.63ab	9.13±1.61b	9.07±0.72ab	9.62±0.42ab	10.07±0.75ab
	2017	7.27±0.07b	8.52±0.55a	8.66±0.35a	8.44±0.04a	8.14±0.07ab
	2019	7.6±0.37c	9.87±0.56b	8.15±0.2c	11.47±0.26a	NA

砧穗组合 Rootstock combination	年份 Vintage	游离单元 Free unit (%)	延伸单元 Extension unit (%)	末端单元 End unit (%)	总含量 Total content
T	2016	0.33±0.06ab	97.64±0.18a	2.03±0.15b	2407.87±737.78ab
	2017	0.41±0.07a	95.23±0.97b	2.18±0.45a	1739.7±537.72a
	2019	0.35±0.08ab	96.21±0.34a	3.07±0.52a	3105.94±526.06a
T/101-14	2016	0.28±0.05b	97.59±0.23a	2.13±0.28b	3133.13±284.96a
	2017	0.3±0.09bc	96.56±0.16a	1.58±0.12b	2039.73±431.15a
	2019	0.4±0.04a	96.09±0.04a	3.37±0.25a	2992.87±254.77a
T/1103P	2016	0.3±0.05ab	94.8±2.34ab	4.9±2.39a	1723.59±612.61b
	2017	0.25±0.01bcd	95.81±0.19ab	1.97±0.09ab	2033.97±129.38a
	2019	0.19±0.07b	96.45±0.06a	3.21±0.09a	2944.9±61.53a
T/Beta	2016	0.35±0.06ab	97.57±0.30a	2.08±0.24b	2131.93±112.34ab
	2017	0.33±0.06ab	94.97±0.79b	2.35±0.36a	1901.87±211.11a
	2019	0.4±0.14a	95.65±0.15b	3.53±0.16a	3411.52±43.98a
T/SO4	2016	0.35±0.14ab	97.26±0.35a	2.4±0.41b	2308.82±116.85ab
	2017	0.31±0.07abc	95.56±0.43ab	2.06±0.24ab	1729.58±619.48a
	2019	NA	NA	NA	NA
年份 Vintage		***	**	*	*
砧木 Rootstock		***	ns	ns	ns
年份×砧木 Vintage × Rootstock		*	ns	ns	ns

比较组 Comparison	成分 Component	R²X	R²Y	Q²Y	200次置换检验 Permutation tests (200 times)
比较组 Comparison	成分 Component	R²X	R²Y	Q²Y	R²Y intercept	Q²Y intercept
T vs T/Beta	1+6	0.999	0.958	0.656	0.633	-1.75
T vs T/SO4	1+4	0.995	0.989	0.901	0.733	-1.73
T vs T/1103P	1+5	0.997	0.966	0.761	0.467	-1.44
T vs T/101-14	1+5	0.998	0.929	0.659	0.623	-1.34

Effects of Different Rootstocks on Flavonoids of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tannat Grape Fruits

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 40

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	YUE LiXin, WANG QingHua, WANG ZhenBao, NIMAQIONGJI, LIU ZeZhou, KONG SuPing, ZHANG LiFeng, GAO LiMin. Widely Targeted Metabolomics-Based Analysis of the Differences in Tibetan Bunching Onion and Chive on Nutritional Quality and Flavonoid Metabolites [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1070-1086.
[2]	LI XinYu, HOU MingYu, CUI ShunLi, LIU YingRu, LI XiuKun, LIU LiFeng. Construction of Near Infrared Spectrometry Model for Flavonoids Content of Peanut with Red and Black Testa [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1284-1295.
[3]	SUN Ping, ZHU WenCan, LIN XianRui, WU JiaQi, CAO YiWen, CHEN ChenFei, WANG Yi, ZHU JianXi, JIA HuiJuan, QIAN MinJie, SHEN JianSheng. Effects of Rainy and Low Light Conditions on Coloration and Flavonoid Accumulation in Peach Peel Based on Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analyses [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1173-1194.
[4]	GUO AoLin, LIN JunXuan, LAI GongTi, HE LiYuan, CHE JianMei, PAN Ruo, YANG FangXue, HUANG YuJi, CHEN GuiXin, LAI ChengChun. Effect of VdF3′5′H2 Overexpression on the Accumulation of Anthocyanin Composition in Spine Grape Cells [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 802-818.
[5]	LUO ZiShu, ZHANG YiJia, ZHOU Rong, ZHANG YanXin, ZHOU Ting, YOU Jun, WANG LinHai. Characterization of Antioxidant Activities in Sesame Leaves and Screening of High Antioxidant Germplasm [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(19): 3814-3824.
[6]	WANG JianFeng, HAN YuQi, WANG Kai, ZHAO Man, LI JiXin, FENG LiDan, ZHANG Bo, ZHAO Yong, JIANG YuMei. Influence of Pre-Harvest Application of Benzothiadiazole on Color and Aroma of Cabernet Gernischt Grapes During Fruit Development [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(19): 3870-3893.
[7]	CHEN XiaoJuan, WANG HaiJu, WANG FuMin, YONG QingQing, HUANG ShunMan, QU Yan. Identification of Key Genes in the Flavonoid Synthesis Pathway of Meconopsis integrifolia Based on WGCNA [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(15): 3053-3070.
[8]	ZHANG Ying, YUAN QingYun, REN Fang, HU GuoJun, FAN XuDong, DONG YaFeng. Establishment of RT-qPCR Detection Technology for GINV and Its Spatial and Temporal Distribution in Different Grape Rootstocks [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(14): 2771-2780.
[9]	ZENG YanXin, GONG HaoNan, YOU ChunXiang, LU JingSheng, GAO WenSheng, WANG XiaoFei. Effects of Different Rootstocks on Growth and Fruit Quality of Young Ruixianghong Apple Trees with Multi-Stem Shape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(14): 2847-2861.
[10]	YE JiaMin, ZHANG MingWei, LU Qi, ZHANG RuiFen, DENG Mei. Effects of Semi-Solid Fermentation with Lactobacillus on the Bitterness and Active Components of Shatianyu (Citrus grandis L. Osbeck) Fruit Powder [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(13): 2662-2673.
[11]	GUO RongKun, DONG NingGuang, NONG HuiLan, WANG Han, TENG WeiChao, MENG JiaXin. Targeted Metabolomics-Based Analysis of Peel Color Differences Between Yellow and Red Hawthorn [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(12): 2439-2453.
[12]	WU SiHui, ZHU HuanHuan, ZHANG JunWei, BAO ManZhu, ZHANG Jie. Determination and Analysis of Flavonoids Metabolites in Different Colors Cultivars and Blooming Stages of Prunus mume [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(9): 1760-1774.
[13]	LI MinJi, LI XingLiang, ZHANG Qiang, ZHOU Jia, YANG YuZhang, ZHOU BeiBei, ZHANG JunKe, WEI QinPing. Effects of Different Distances from Original Planting Row on Tree Growth and Fruit Yield of Young Trees of G935 Dwarf Rootstock Miyato Fuji Under Continuous Cropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(17): 3412-3419.
[14]	GAO ZiYuan, HU JingAng, ZHANG BeiBei, GONG Biao. Screening and Comprehensive Evaluation of Tomato Rootstocks with High Efficiency of Phosphorus Utilization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(14): 2761-2775.
[15]	LI JiaQi, XUN Mi, SHI JunYuan, SONG JianFei, SHI YuJia, ZHANG WeiWei, YANG HongQiang. Response Characteristics of Rhizosphere and Root Endosphere Bacteria and Rhizosphere Enzyme Activities to Soil Compaction Stress in Young Apple Tree [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(13): 2563-2573.