Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (16): 3219-3228.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.16.015

• VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Measurement of Skin Thickness Along the Whole Body Sites and Association Study with Candidate SNPs on Sus Scrofa Chromosome 7 in Bamaxiang Pigs

HUANG Tao, HUANG Xiao-chang, QIU Heng-qing, YAN Guo-rong, HUANG Yi-zhong, ZHANG Yi-feng, JIANG Jia-cheng, ZHOU Li-sheng, REN Jun, MA Jun-wu, XIAO Shi-jun, HUANG Lu-sheng, YANG Bin, AI Hua-shui   

  1. National Key Laboratory for Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045
  • Received:2015-08-19 Online:2016-08-16 Published:2016-08-16

Abstract: 【Objective】Skin thickness at 9 typical sites of the whole pig body were measured in Bamaxiang pig breed, one of the Chinese local miniature pig breeds. There are 46 candidate SNPs located in a major QTL affecting skin thickness on sus scrofa chromosome 7 (SSC7) were genotyped in the Bamaxiang pig population. One aim of this study is to make clear variation rule of skin thickness at different body sites in Bamaxiang pigs. The other aim is to verify the major QTL affecting skin thickness on SSC7 in Bamaxiang pig population by association study in a specific genomic region. Result of this study will contribute to further revealing the genetic mechanism of swine skin thickness in a larger pig population at whole genome level, and increase our understanding about pig skin. 【Method】A totle of 50 Bamaxiang pigs, including 27 females and 23 castrated males, were randomly selected from a Bamaxiang pig population consisting of 319 adult pigs, which were slaughtered at 300 days. The skin with 5 cm2 area were cut from 9 body sites of cheek, shoulder, back, loin, rump, chest, belly, armpit and trotter. Skin thickness at these 9 different body sites were accurately measured using digital caliper. The difference of skin thickness between pairwise body sites and the difference between females and castrated males were tested using the basic statistic package of R language. Pairwise Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between skin thickness at different body sites, meanwhile their significant tests were done. A total of 46 SNPs located in the region from 34.5 to 36.2 Mb on SSC7 were selected and designed for genotyping on a SEQUENOM MassARRAY SNP Genotyping platform. Combined with the above phenotypes of skin thickness, association studies on the target candidate region were performed by a general mixed linear model using SNPasscoc package of R language. Based on the association results and biological function of genes, positional candidate genes were determined. 【Result】One-way analysis of variance showed that an extreme significant difference with a 2.95×10-117 probability existed among skin thickness at 9 body sites in Bamaxiang pigs. The thickest body sites were loin and back with skin thickness of (5.15 ± 0.92) and (4.97 ± 0.85) mm, respectively, while the thinnest sites were belly and armpit with skin thickness of (1.77 ± 0.36) and (1.97 ± 0.68) mm, respectively. The body sites with skin thickness from thick to thin in turn were loin, back, shoulder, cheek, rump, trotter, chest, armpit and belly. Skin thickness of castrated male pig at armpit was significantly thinner than female pig with a 0.021 probability. When compared between other pairwise body sites, skin thickness had no significant differences. There was no significant correlation between skin thickness at belly and back, between belly and shoulder, and between belly and cheek. Other pairwise combinations had a significant positive correlation. Association analysis between skin thickness at 9 different body sites and the above candidate SNPs suggested that the major QTL on SSC7 affecting skin thickness was also identified in Bamaxiang pig population. Three most promising SNPs were worthy of being further focused on. SNP (chr7:34856565) showed most significant association with skin thickness at loin (Pcor = 5.15×10-6), which was also the most significant site associated with skin thickness at shoulder (Pcor = 5.75×10-6). SNP (chr7:35543837) was the most significant site associated with skin thickness at armpit (Pcor = 3.05×10-5), at rump (Pcor = 0.010), at chest (Pcor = 0.013) and cheek (Pcor = 0.025), also was the second most significant site with shoulder. SNP (chr7:35573869) was the top significant site associated with back skin thickness (Pcor = 1.17×10-5), and followed by SNPs (chr7:35543837 and chr7: 34856565). Based on nearest genes of top SNPs and their biological function, ANKS1A and HMGA1 were preliminarily suggested to be positional candidate genes possibly affecting skin thickness in pigs.  【Conclusion】It was the first time to measure skin thickness at 9 different body sites and report the variation rule of skin thickness along the whole body in Bamaxiang pig breed, one of the Chinese local miniature pig breed. Meanwhile the major QTL affecting skin thickness on SSC7 was verified in Bamaxiang pig population, it provided an important clue and base to reveal the genetic mechanism of pig skin thickness in future. ANKS1A and HMGA1 might be positional causal genes affecting skin thickness in pigs, and it needs further verification of biological functional test.

Key words: Bamaxiang pigs, skin thickness, candidate SNP sites, association study

[1]    国家畜禽遗传资源委员会. 中国畜禽遗传资源志:猪志. 北京:中国农业出版社,2011.
National Commission on Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources. Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources in China: Pigs. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
[2]    张自勤. 长寿之乡的巴马香猪. 中国牧业通讯,1998(5): 59.
ZHANG Z Q. Bamaxiang pigs in the longevity hometown. China Animal Husbandry Bulletin, 1998(5):59. (in Chinese)
[3]    LIU Y, ZENG B H, SHANG H T, CEN Y Y, WEI H. Bama miniature pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) as a model for drug evaluation for humans: comparison of in vitro metabolism and in vivo pharmacokinetics of lovastatin. Comparative Medicine, 2008, 58(6):580.
[4]    陈玉龙. 巴马香猪肝硬化模型的建立及其肠道菌群演替的研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2010.
CHEN Y L. Develop an animal model of liver cirrhosis in Bama miniature pig and research its succession of intestinal flora [D]. Chongqing: Southwest university, 2010. (in Chinese)
[5]    PROKSCH E, BRANDNER J M, JENSEN J M. The skin: an indispensable barrier. Experimental Dermatology, 2008, 17(12): 1063-1072.
[6]    罗建勋,李书卿. 对猪皮革产品的思考与对策. 西部皮革,2008,30(8): 3-5.
LUO J X, LI S Q. Consideration on pigskin leather products. West Leather, 2008, 30(8):3-5. (in Chinese)
[7]    陈炯,韩春茂,张力成. 异种 (猪) 脱细胞真皮基质与自体皮复合移植的临床应用. 中华整形外科杂志,2002,18(5):271-272.
CHEN J, HAN C M, ZHANG L C. The clinical application of xenogenic (porcine) acellular dermal matrix grafting with thin autogenic skin on deep wounds. Chinese Journal Plastic Surgery, 2002, 18(5):271-272. (in Chinese)
[8]    陈俊颖,魏泓. 巴马香猪无细胞真皮制备及其生物学特性. 中国比较医学杂志,2006, 16(11): 671-674.
Chen J Y, Wei H. Preparation of BAMA miniature pis's acellular dermal matrix and its biological characteristics. Chinese Journal of Comparative Medicine, 2006, 16(11): 671-674. (in Chinese)
[9]    刘宇. 以洛伐他汀为典型药物研究巴马香猪和人代谢的异同[D]. 重庆:第三军医大学,2008.
LIU Y. A comparative study on the differences and similarities of lovastatin metabolism between the Bama miniature pigs and human[D]. Chongqing: Third Military Medical University, 2008. (in Chinese)
[10]   SCHMOOK F P, MEINGASSNER J G, BILLICH A. Comparison of human skin or epidermis models with human and animal skin in in vitro percutaneous absorption. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2001, 215(1): 51-56.
[11]   SETO J E, POLAT B E, LOPEZ R F, BLANKSCHTEIN D, LANGER R. Effects of ultrasound and sodium lauryl sulfate on the transdermal delivery of hydrophilic permeants: Comparative in vitro studies with full-thickness and split-thickness pig and human skin. Journal of Controlled Release, 2010, 145(1):26-32.
[12]   WONG S, KAUR A, BACK M, LEE K M, BAGGARLEY S, LU J J. An ultrasonographic evaluation of skin thickness in breast cancer patients after postmastectomy radiation therapy. Radiation oncology, 2011, 6(9):1-10.
[13]   YONEDA P D P, BIANCOLIN S E, GOMES M S M, MIOT H A. Association between skin thickness and bone density in adult women. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 2011, 86(5):878-884.
[14]   邹铭之. 猪皮肤厚度与瘦肉率的关系. 养猪,1989(3):26-27.
ZOU M Z. The Relationship between swine skin thickness and the ratio of lean meat. Swine, 1989(3):26-27. (in Chinese)
[15]   陈德端, 王瑞华. 云南本地猪与各杂交组合猪皮厚度的研究. 云南畜牧兽医,1993(3): 7-9.
CHEN D D, WANG R H. Study on skin thickness in Yunnan local pigs and hybrid pigs. Yunnan Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 1993(3): 7-9. (in Chinese)
[16]   王全杰. 猪皮部位差异的基本规律及对制革工艺的影响. 中国皮革,1993, 22(2):17-20.
WANG Q J. The basic variation law of pig skin at different body sites and its effect on the tanning process. China Leather, 1993, 22(2): 17-20. (in Chinese)
[17]   AI H, XIAO S J, ZHANG Z Y, YANG B, LI L, GUO Y M, LIN G S, REN J, HUANG L S. Three novel quantitative trait loci for skin thickness in swine identified by linkage and genome-wide association studies. Animal Genetics, 2014, 45(4): 524-533.
[18]   SULLIVAN T P, EAGLSTEIN W H, DAVIS S C, MERTZ P. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 2001, 9(2):66-76.
[19] SANDBY-MØLLER J, POULSEN T, WULF H C. Influence of epidermal thickness, pigmentation and redness on skin autofluorescence. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2003, 77(6): 616-620.
[20]   VOLKERING M. Variation of skin thickness over the equine body and the correlation between skin fold measurement and actual skin thickness [D]. Utrecht, Netherlands: University Utrecht, 2009.
[21]   DERRAIK J G, RADEMAKER M, CUTFIELD W S, PINTO T E, TREGURTHA S, FAHERTY A, PEART J M, DRURY P L, HOFMAN P L. Effects of age, gender, BMI, and anatomical site on skin thickness in children and adults with diabetes. PloS One, 2014, 9(1): e86637.
[22]   PANDEY A, BLAGOEV B, KRATCHMAROVA I, FERNANDEZ M, NIELSEN M, KRISTIANSEN T Z, OHARA O, PODTELEJNIKOV A V, ROCHE S, LODISH H F, MANN M. Cloning of a novel phosphotyrosine binding domain containing molecule, Odin, involved in signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Oncogene, 2002, 21(52): 8029-8036.
[23]   TONG J, SYDORSKYY Y, ST-GERMAIN J R, TAYLOR P, TSAO M S, MORAN M F. Odin (ANKS1A) modulates EGF receptor recycling and stability. PloS One, 2013, 8(6):e64817.
[24]   GUDBJARTSSON D F, WALTERS G B, THORLEIFSSON G, STEFANSSON H, HALLDORSSON B V, ZUSMANOVICH P, SULEM P, THORLACIUS S, GYLFASON A, STEINBERG S, HELGADOTTIR A, INGASON A, STEINTHORSDOTTIR V, OLAFSDOTTIR E J, OLAFSDOTTIR G H, JONSSON T, BORCH-JOHNSEN K, HANSEN T, ANDERSEN G, JORGENSEN T, PEDERSEN O, ABEN K K, WITJES J A, SWINKELS D W, DEN HEIJER M, FRANKE B, VERBEEK A L, BECKER D M, YANEK L R, BECKER L C, TRYGGVADOTTIR L, RAFNAR T, GULCHER J, KIEMENEY L A, KONG A, THORSTEINSDOTTIR U, STEFANSSON K. Many sequence variants affecting diversity of adult human height. Nature Genetics, 2008(40):609-615.
[25]   ZHANG L C, LI N, LIU X, LIANG J, YAN H, ZHAO K B, PU L, SHI H B, ZHANG Y B, WANG L X. A genome-wide association study of limb bone length using a Large White × Minzhu intercross population. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2014(46):56.
[1] BaoHua CHU,FuGuo CAO,NingNing BIAN,Qian QIAN,ZhongXing LI,XueWei LI,ZeYuan LIU,FengWang MA,QingMei GUAN. Resistant Evaluation of 84 Apple Cultivars to Alternaria alternata f. sp. mali and Genome-Wide Association Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3613-3628.
[2] CHANG LiGuo,HE KunHui,LIU JianChao. Mining of Genetic Locus of Maize Stay-Green Related Traits Under Multi-Environments [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3071-3081.
[3] LI Ting,DONG Yuan,ZHANG Jun,FENG ZhiQian,WANG YaPeng,HAO YinChuan,ZHANG XingHua,XUE JiQuan,XU ShuTu. Genome-Wide Association Study of Ear Related Traits in Maize Hybrids [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2485-2499.
[4] WANG JiQing,REN Yi,SHI XiaoLei,WANG LiLi,ZHANG XinZhong,SULITAN· GuZhaLiAYi,XIE Lei,GENG HongWei. Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Activity in Wheat Grain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2249-2260.
[5] ZHANG LinLin,ZHI Hui,TANG Sha,ZHANG RenLiang,ZHANG Wei,JIA GuanQing,DIAO XianMin. Characterizations of Transcriptional and Haplotypic Variations of SiTOC1 in Foxtail Millet [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2273-2286.
[6] ZHANG JiFeng,LIU HuaDong,WANG JingGuo,LIU HuaLong,SUN Jian,YANG LuoMiao,JIA Yan,WU WenShen,ZHENG HongLiang,ZOU DeTang. Genome-Wide Association Study and Candidate Gene Mining of Tillering Number in Japonica Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(16): 3205-3213.
[7] HeXu CAI,KaiLiang BO,Qi ZHOU,Han MIAO,ShaoYun DONG,XingFang GU,ShengPing ZHANG. GWAS Analysis of Hypocotyl Length and Candidate Gene Mining in Cucumber Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 122-132.
[8] ZHANG XiaoQiong,GUO Jian,DAI ShuTao,REN Yuan,LI FengYan,LIU JingBao,LI YongXiang,ZHANG DengFeng,SHI YunSu,SONG YanChun,LI Yu,WANG TianYu,ZOU HuaWen,LI ChunHui. Phenotypic Variation and Genome-wide Association Analysis of Root Architecture at Maize Flowering Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(14): 2391-2405.
[9] SHI DaKun, YAO TianLong, LIU NanNan, DENG Min, DUAN HaiYang, WANG LuLin, WAN Jiong, GAO JiongHao, XIE HuiLing, TANG JiHua, ZHANG XueHai. Genome-Wide Association Study of Chlorophyll Content in Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(11): 1839-1857.
[10] SHEN ManMan, QU Liang, DOU TaoCun, MA Meng, GUO Jun, LU Jian, HU YuPing, LI YongFeng, WANG KeHua. Genome-Wide Association of Spleen Weight in Layer Chicken [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(6): 1213-1222.
[11] LIU Kun, ZHANG XueHai, SUN GaoYang, YAN PengShuai, GUO HaiPing, CHEN SiYuan, XUE YaDong, GUO ZhanYong, XIE HuiLing, TANG JiHua, LI WeiHua. Genome-Wide Association Studies of Plant Type Traits in Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(5): 821-834.
[12] ZHANG YuJuan, YOU Jun, LIU AiLi, LI DongHua, YU JingYin, WANG YanYan, ZHOU Rong, GONG HuiHui, ZHANG XiuRong. Screening Method for Salt Tolerance in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and Identification of Candidate Salt-tolerant Genes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(12): 2235-2247.
[13] ZHOU QingHong, ZHOU Can, ZHENG Wei, FU DongHui. Genome Wide Association Analysis of Silique Length in Brassica napus L. [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(2): 228-239.
[14] GAO BaoZhen, LIU Bo, LI ShiKai, LIANG JianLi, CHENG Feng, WANG XiaoWu, WU Jian. Genome-Wide Association Studies for Flowering Time in Brassica rapa [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(17): 3375-3385.
[15] GAO YiHong, YAN JinXiang, TU ZhengJun, LENG YuJia, CHEN Long, HUANG LiChao, DAI LiPing, ZHANG GuangHeng, ZHU Li, HU Jiang, REN DeYong, GUO LongBiao, QIAN Qian, WANG DanYing, ZENG DaLi. Genome-Wide Association Analysis on Flag Leaf Width Under Different Nitrogen Levels in Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(14): 2635-2646.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!