Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (14): 2853-2862.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.14.015

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Chinese and American Alfalfa(Medicago Sativa. L) Germplasm Assessed by SSR Markers

 QIANG  Hai-Ping-1, YU  Guo-Hui-1, LIU  Hai-Quan-1, GAO  Hong-Wen-1, LIU  Gui-Bo-2, ZHAO  Hai-Ming-2, WANG  Zan-1   

  1. 1、Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193;
    2、Institute of Dry Farming, Hebei Academy of Agroforestry Sciences, Hengshui 053000, Hebei
  • Received:2013-11-15 Online:2014-07-15 Published:2014-05-14

Abstract: 【Objective】Alfalfa is the most important cultivated forage across the world. However, for little improvement in forage yield and quality in recent years, conventional breeding methods are far from satisfying the practical need. On the one hand, the improvement in cultivars relies on the quantity of breeding resources, on the other hand, it relies on the understanding of the genetic basis of agronomic traits. Based on SSR markers, the study was conducted to analyze the genetic diversity and population structure of the germplasm from China and the United States and provide basic information on mining beneficial markers and alleles significantly associated with important quantitative and quality traits of alfalfa when using genome-wide association study to facilitate breeding process.【Method】In total, 40 SSR loci, covered the entire alfalfa genome with 3 to 9 SSR loci chosen on each chromosome, were used to conduct the genomic scanning of a collection of 100 Chinese and American alfalfa genotypes out of 16 main cultivars and to determine the genetic diversity and population structure. For Chinese cultivars, 8 genotypes were chosen for each cultivar; while for American cultivars, 4 genotypes per cultivar. Based on the admixture model, the software program STRUCTURE was used to determine the population structure of alfalfa. The optimal value of K (the number of clusters) was deducted by evaluating K=1-6. Length of burn-in of the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) iterations was set to 10 000 and data were collected over 100 000 MCMC iterations in each run. Ten iterations per K were conducted. The optimal value of K was identified using two methods. The result was displayed by Structure Harvester and Distruct. Further, the principle component analysis and clustering analysis were conducted to justify the result of population structure. Based on the result of population structure, the genetic diversity of all samples and two populations were analyzed.【Result】A total of 446 alleles were detected using 40 SSR markers while 11.2 alleles was detected on average per locus with the range of 3-27, expected heterozygosity was 0.742 on average with the range of 0.493-0.901 and polymorphism information content (PIC) was 0.707 with the range of 0.493-0.901. These parameters indicated high genetic information in Chinese and American alfalfa cultivar resources. For the high genetic diversity displayed by mtic238, mtic188, bf111, afctt1, bf641851, maa660456, aw361, etc., they were suitable to disclose the genetic diversity in Chinese and American alfalfa. In terms of different chromosomes, the second and eighth chromosomes possessed relatively high genetic diversity while the first relatively low. In the analysis of population structure based on the admixture model, two different methods determined the optimal K was 2, which meant 100 genotypes from 16 cultivars could be grouped into two sub-populations even with certain discrepancy. The principle component analysis and clustering analysis were consistent with the analysis of population structure. The genetic diversity of Chinese cultivars was slightly higher than American’s, but not significant. 【Conclusion】 The germplasms from China and the United States were relatively highly diversified and variable in genetic analyses, revealing high genetic diversity. Difference exists in the diversity of genotypes of both countries: Chinese germplasm is slightly higher than those from America. The fact that the population structure of all genotypes was not strictly consistent with the original countries is credited to the allogamy and wide genetic exchange in alfalfa.

Key words: alfalfa , tetraploid , SSR marker , genetic diversity , population structure

[1]Bolton J L. Alfalfa: botany, ultivation and utilization. London: Leonard Hill Ltd.and New York: Interscience. Inc, 1962.

[2]王鑫,马永祥,李娟. 紫花苜蓿营养成分及主要生物学特性. 草业科学, 2003, 20(10): 39-41.

Wang X, Ma Y X, Li J. Nutrients and major biological characteristics of alfalfa (Medicago sativa. L). Pratacultural Science, 2003, 20(10): 39-41.(in Chinese)

[3]Barnes D K, Goplen B P, Baylor J E, Hanson A A, Hill Jr R R. Highlights in the USA and Canada. Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement, 1988: 1-24.

[4]Flajoulot S, Ronfort J, Baudouin P, Barre P, Huguet T, Huyghe C, Julier B. Genetic diversity among alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cultivars coming from a breeding program, using SSR markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005, 111(7): 1420-1429.

[5]?akiro?lu M, Doyle J, Charles Brummer E. Inferring population structure and genetic diversity of broad range of wild diploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) accessions using SSR markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2010, 121(3): 403-415.

[6]Bagavathiannan M V, Julier B, Barre P, Gulden R H, Acker R C. Genetic diversity of feral alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations occurring in Manitoba, Canada and comparison with alfalfa cultivars: an analysis using SSR markers and phenotypic traits. Euphytica, 2010, 173(3): 419-432.

[7]李拥军, 苏加楷. 苜蓿地方品种遗传多样性的研究—RAPD 标记. 草地学报, 1998, 6(2): 105-114.

Li Y J, Su J K. Study on the genetic diversity of the alfalfa local varieties (Medicago sativa L.) based on RAPD markers. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 1998, 6(2): 105-114. (in Chinese)

[8]蒿若超, 张月学, 唐凤兰. 利用 RAPD 分子标记研究苜蓿种质资源遗传多样性. 草业科学, 2007, 24(8): 69-73.

Hao R C, Zhang Y X, Tang F L. Study on the genetic diversity of Medicago sativa using RAPD/PCR. Pratacultural Science, 2007, 24(8): 69-73.(in Chinese)

[9]陈冬立, 宝力德, 杜建材, 王照兰, 胡卉芳, 米超. 31 份苜蓿种质材料的遗传多样性及亲缘关系分析. 中国草地学报, 2013, 35(2): 19-23.

Chen D L, Bao L D, Du J C, Wang Z L, Hu H F, Mi C. Genetic diversity and genetic relationship analysis of 31 alfalfa accessions based on RAPD markers. Chinese Journal of Grassland. 2013, 35(2): 19-23. (in Chinese)

[10]魏臻武, 符昕, 耿小丽, 赵艳, 曹致中, 胡自治. 苜蓿遗传多样性和亲缘关系的 SSR 和 ISSR 分析. 草地学报, 2007, 15(2): 118-123.

Wei Z W, Fu X, Geng X L, Zhao Y, Cao Z Z, Hu Z Z. Estimates of genetic diversity of alfalfa by SSR and ISSR. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2007, 15(2): 118-123. (in Chinese)

[11]闫娟, 楚海家, 王恒昌, 李建强. 用 EST-SSR 标记分析中国北部和中部地区天蓝苜蓿的遗传多样性和遗传结构. 生物多样性, 2008, 16(3): 263-270.

Yan J, Chu H J, Wang H C, Li J Q. Genetic structure and diversity of Medicago lupulina populations in northern and central China based on EST-SSRs markers. Biodiversity Science, 2008, 16(3): 263-270.(in Chinese)

[12]Doyle J J. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus, 1990, 12: 13-15.

[13]Eujayl I, Sledge M K, Wang L, May G D, Chekhovskiy K, Zwonitzer J C, Mian M a R. Medicago truncatula EST-SSRs reveal cross-species genetic markers for Medicago spp. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2004, 108(3): 414-422.

[14]Robins J G, Bauchan G R, Brummer E C. Genetic mapping forage yield, plant height, and regrowth at multiple harvests in tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Crop Science, 2007, 47(1): 11-18.

[15]Rinehart T A. AFLP analysis using GeneMapper® software and an Excel® macro that aligns and converts output to binary. Biotechniques, 2004, 37(2): 186-187.

[16]Esselink G D, Nybom H, Vosman B. Assignment of allelic configuration in polyploids using the MAC-PR (microsatellite DNA allele counting—peak ratios) method. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2004, 109(2): 402-408.

[17]Thrall P, Young A. AUTOTET: a program for analysis of autotetraploid genotypic data. Journal of Heredity, 2000, 91(4): 348-349.

[18]Pritchard J K, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 2000, 155(2): 945-959.

[19]Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 2005, 14(8): 2611-2620.

[20]Earl D, Vonholdt B. Structure Harvester: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources, 2012, 4(2): 359-361.

[21]Rosenberg N A. Distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2004, 4(1): 137-138.

[22]Peakall R O D, Smouse P E. Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2006, 6(1): 288-295.

[23]Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2011, 28(10): 2731-2739.

[24]Botstein D, White R L, Skolnick M, Davis R W. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics, 1980, 32(3): 314-331.

[25]全国牧草品种审定委员会编. 中国牧草登记品种集. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1999: 120-151.

Compiled by the Committee of the National licened cultivars of herbage crops. Licensed Cultivars of Herbage Crops in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1999: 120-151.(in Chinese)
[1] CHEN JiHao, ZHOU JieGuang, QU XiangRu, WANG SuRong, TANG HuaPing, JIANG Yun, TANG LiWei, $\boxed{\hbox{LAN XiuJin}}$, WEI YuMing, ZHOU JingZhong, MA Jian. Mapping and Analysis of QTL for Embryo Size-Related Traits in Tetraploid Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 203-216.
[2] JIANG Peng, ZHANG Peng, YAO JinBao, WU Lei, HE Yi, LI Chang, MA HongXiang, ZHANG Xu. Phenotypic Characteristics and Related Gene Analysis of Ningmai Series Wheat Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 233-247.
[3] SU Qian,DU WenXuan,MA Lin,XIA YaYing,LI Xue,QI Zhi,PANG YongZhen. Cloning and Functional Analyses of MsCIPK2 in Medicago sativa [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3697-3709.
[4] XiaoChuan LI,ChaoHai WANG,Ping ZHOU,Wei MA,Rui WU,ZhiHao SONG,Yan MEI. Deciphering of the Genetic Diversity After Field Late Blight Resistance Evaluation of Potato Breeds [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3484-3500.
[5] YingLing WAN,MengTing ZHU,AiQing LIU,YiJia JIN,Yan LIU. Phenotypic Diversity Analysis of Chinese Ornamental Herbaceous Peonies and Its Germplasm Resource Evaluation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3629-3639.
[6] HU GuangMing,ZHANG Qiong,HAN Fei,LI DaWei,LI ZuoZhou,WANG Zhi,ZHAO TingTing,TIAN Hua,LIU XiaoLi,ZHONG CaiHong. Screening and Application of Universal SSR Molecular Marker Primers in Actinidia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3411-3425.
[7] ZHANG YunXiu,JIANG Xu,WEI ChunXue,JIANG XueQian,LU DongYu,LONG RuiCai,YANG QingChuan,WANG Zhen,KANG JunMei. The Functional Analysis of High Mobility Group MsHMG-Y Involved in Flowering Regulation in Medicago sativa L. [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3082-3092.
[8] CHEN Xu,HAO YaQiong,NIE XingHua,YANG HaiYing,LIU Song,WANG XueFeng,CAO QingQin,QIN Ling,XING Yu. Association Analysis of Main Characteristics of Bur and Nut with SSR Markers in Chinese Chestnut [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2613-2628.
[9] XU Xiao,REN GenZeng,ZHAO XinRui,CHANG JinHua,CUI JiangHui. Accurate Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation of Panicle Phenotypic Traits of Landraces and Cultivars of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108.
[10] TANG XiuJun,FAN YanFeng,JIA XiaoXu,GE QingLian,LU JunXian,TANG MengJun,HAN Wei,GAO YuShi. Genetic Diversity and Origin Characteristics of Chicken Species Based on Mitochondrial DNA D-loop Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(24): 5302-5315.
[11] MA Lin,WEN HongYu,WANG XueMin,GAO HongWen,PANG YongZhen. Cloning and Function Analysis of MsMAX2 Gene in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(19): 4061-4069.
[12] LI XinYuan, LOU JinXiu, LIU QingYuan, HU Jian, ZHANG YingJun. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Rhizobia Associated with Medicago sativa Cultivated in Northeast and North China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(16): 3393-3405.
[13] WANG FuQiang,ZHANG Jian,WEN ChangLong,FAN XiuCai,ZHANG Ying,SUN Lei,LIU ChongHuai,JIANG JianFu. Identification of Grape Cultivars Based on KASP Markers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2830-2842.
[14] YANG Tao,HUANG YaJie,LI ShengMei,REN Dan,CUI JinXin,PANG Bo,YU Shuang,GAO WenWei. Genetic Diversity and Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Traits in Sea-Island Cotton Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(12): 2499-2509.
[15] CUI YiPing,PENG AiTian,SONG XiaoBing,CHENG BaoPing,LING JinFeng,CHEN Xia. Investigation on Occurrence of Citrus Huanglongbing and Virus Diseases, and Prophage Genetic Diversity of Huanglongbing Pathogen in Meizhou, Guangdong [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1572-1582.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!