Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (9): 1681-1691.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.09.003

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Genetic and QTL Analysis of Root Traits at Seedling Stage in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]

 LIANG  Hui-Zhen-1, YU  Yong-Liang-1, YANG  Hong-Qi-1, ZHANG  Hai-Yang-1, DONG  Wei-1, CUI  Wei-Wen-1, GONG  Peng-Tao-2, FANG  Xuan-Jun-3   

  1. 1、Sesame Research Center, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002;
    2、Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Saline-alkali Vegetation Ecology Restoration in Oil Field (SAVER) /Alkali Soil Natural Environmental Science Center (ASNESC), Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040;
    3、Hainan Institute of Tropical Agriculture Resources, Sanya 572025, Hainan
  • Received:2013-11-22 Online:2014-05-01 Published:2014-01-23

Abstract: 【Objective】 Roots provide nutrition and affect crop yields. Root traits are believed to be complex and controlled by many genes, which show stability in different environments and present higher heritability. Study of such traits by QTL mapping of roots at seedling stage is needed for effective heredity breeding in soybean. The map spanned 2 047.6 cM across 27 linkage groups that contained 232 markers. 【Method】 With the methods of segregation analysis on the major-polygene mixed inheritance and composite interval mapping, a soybean SSR genetic linkage map constructed by a total of 447 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from a cross between Jindou 23 (cultivar, female parent) and Huibuzhiheidou (semi-wild; male parent, ZDD2315) were used to analyze and identify the QTLs of root traits during seedling stage in soybean. Thirty seeds from each of the RILs and their parents were covered with pasteurized paper, and cultivated in clean water at 20-28℃ on 27 May, 2013, and the experiment was finished on 28 June, 2013. A complete random design with three replications was used. Root traits were measured on 8 June and 8 July at V2 stage.【Result】This grouping was supported by significant positive correlations among MRL, LRN, RW, RV and SW. There were highly significant positive correlations between HL and HW, and HL and SW. Root traits showed mutual influence and restriction, laying a foundation for selection of phenotypic traits. The inheritance analysis showed that the length of main root was controlled by three pairs of equivalent major genes; the number of lateral roots was controlled by two pairs of major genes; the weight and volume of root were controlled by four pairs of major genes; the length of hypocotyl was controlled by four pairs of additive major genes; the weight of hypocotyl was controlled by four pairs additive-additive × additive epistatic major genes. The polygene effect wasn’t found in all above root traits. The weights of leaf and stems were controlled by additive genes, but didn’t find major gene effects. Twenty-four QTLs associated with length of main root, number of lateral root, volume of root, weight of leaf and stems, length of hypocotyl and weight of hypocotyl were mapped on A1, A2, B1, B2, C2, D1b, F_1, G, H_1, H_2, I, K_2, L, M, N and O linkage groups respectively. Five QTLs for MRL were identified on linkage groups B1, L, N and O, respectively. The variation accounted for by each of these five QTLs ranged from 7.05% to 13.18%. Four QTLs for LRN were identified on linkage groups A1, D1b, I and L. The phenotype variation accounted for by each of these four QTLs ranged from 8.21% to 16.43%. Three QTLs for RW were identified on linkage groups F_1, G and N, respectively; the phenotype variation accounted for by each of these three QTLs ranged from 7.55% to 10.85%. Three QTLs for RV were identified on linkage groups K_2 and M based on the data from 27 May. The phenotype variation accounted for by each of these three QTLs ranged from 8.44% to 12.39%, but the main QTL was not detected in the experiment on 28 June. Five QTLs for SW were identified on linkage groups A1, A2 and N. They accounted for phenotype variation ranging from 11.43% to 38.91%. qSW1-a2-1, qSW2-a2-1 and qSW2-a2-1 were all located on chromosome A2. Based on the data for HL on 27 May, the QTL was located in linkage group H_1. It explained 7.86% of the phenotype variation, but the main QTL was not found on 28 June. Three QTLs for HW were identified on linkage groups B2, C2 and H_2. They accounted for phenotype variation ranging from 7.70% to 12.48%.【Conclusion】The inheritance control of root traits is very complicated. Root traits have complex genetic mechanisms at the seedling stage. This study has provided a foundation for further research on root genetic regulation and molecular breeding with emphasis on correlations among root traits to ensure robust root growth and well-developed root systems.

Key words: soybean , root traits , seedling stage , genetic , QTL

[1]廖红, 严小龙. 菜豆根构型对低磷胁迫的适应性变化及基因型差异. 植物学报, 2000, 42(2): 158-163.

Liao H, Yan X L. Adaptive changes genotypic variation for root architecture of common bean in response to phosphorus deficiency. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2000, 42(2): 158-163. (in Chinese)

[2]杨秀红, 吴宗璞, 张国栋. 不同年代大豆品种根系性状演化的研究. 中国农业科学, 2001, 34(3): 292-295.

Yang X H, Wu Z P, Zhang G D. Evolution of root characters of soybean varieties of different ages. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2001, 34(3): 292-295. (in Chinese)

[3]Tar’an B, Warkentin T, Somers D J, Miranda D, Vandenberg A, Blade S, Woods S, Bing D, Xue A, DeKoeyer D, Penner G. Quantitative trait loci for lodging resistance, plant height and partial resistance to mycosphaerella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2003, 107: 1482-1491.

[4]周蓉, 王贤智, 陈海峰, 张晓娟, 单志慧, 吴学军, 蔡淑平, 邱德珍, 周新安, 吴江生. 大豆倒伏性及其相关性状的QTL分析. 作物学报, 2009, 35(1): 57-65.

Zhou R, Wang X Z, Chen H F, Zhang X J, Shan Z H, Wu X J, Cai S P, Qiu D Z, Zhou X A, Wu J S. QTL analysis of lodging and related traits in soybean. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(1): 57-65. (in Chinese)

[5]Pantalone V R, Buton J W, Carter T E J. Soybean fibrous root heritability and genotypic correlations with agronomic and seed quality traits. Crop Science, 1996, 36: 1120-1125.

[6]Liu F L, Andersen M N, Jensen C R. Root signal controls pod growth in drought-stressed soybean during the critical, abortion-sensitive phase of pod development. Field Crops Research, 2004, 85: 159-166.

[7]田佩占. 大豆品种根系的生态类型研究. 作物学报, 1984, 10(3): 173-178.

Tian P Z. Ecotypes of root system in soybean cultivars. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1984, 10(3): 173-178. (in Chinese)

[8]孙广玉, 何庸, 张荣华, 张代平. 大豆根系生长和活性特点的研究. 大豆科学, 1996, 15(14): 317-321.

Sun G Y, He Y, Zhang R H, Zhang D P. Studies on growth and activities of soybean root. Soybean Science, 1996, 15(14): 317-321. (in Chinese)

[9]Kamoshita A, Wade L J, Ali M L, Pathan M S, Zhang J, Sarkarung S, Nguyen H T. Mapping QTLs for root morphology of a rice population adapted to rainfed lowland conditions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2002, 104: 880-893.

[10]Kamoshita A, Zhang J, Siopongco J, Sarkarung S, Nguyen H T, Wade L J. Effect of phenotyping environment on identification of quantitative trait loci for rice root morphology under anaerobic conditions. Crop Science, 2002, 42: 255-265.

[11]Hao Z F, Chang X P, Guo X J, Jing R L, Li R Z, Jia J A. QTL mapping of germination for drought tolerance at stages and seedling in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a DH population. Agricultural Science in China, 2003, 2(9): 943-949.

[12]Dhanda S S, Sethi G S, Behl R K. Indices of drought tolerance in wheat genotypes at early stages of plant growth. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2004, 190(1): 6-12.

[13]周晓果, 景蕊莲, 郝转芳, 昌小平, 张正斌. 小麦幼苗根系性状的QTL分析. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(10): 1951-1957.

Zhou X G, Jing R L, Hao Z F, Chang X P, Zhang Z B. Mapping QTL for seedling root traits in common wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005, 38(10): 1951-1957. (in Chinese)

[14]Price A H, Steele K A, Moore B J, Barraclough P B, Clark L J. A combined RFLP (Oryza sativa L.) used to identify QTLs for root-penetration and AFLP linkage map of upland rice ability. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2000, 100: 49-56.

[15]张微. 利用RIL群体定位玉米苗期根系QTL的研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2005.

Zhang W. Identification of QTL for seedling root traits using RIL population in maize [D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2005. (in Chinese)

[16]King C A, Purcell L C, Brye K R. Differential wilting among soybean genotypes in response to water deficit. Crop Science, 2009, 49: 290-291.

[17]刘莹, 盖钧镒, 吕慧能. 大豆根区逆境耐性的种质鉴定及其与根系性状的关系. 作物学报, 2005, 31(9): 1132-1137.

Liu Y, Gai J Y, Lü H N. Identification of rhizosphere abiotic stress tolerance and related root traits in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2005, 31(9): 1132-1137. (in Chinese)

[18]刘莹, 盖钧镒, 吕慧能. 大豆品种苗期根系性状的遗传变异及其与耐逆境胁迫的关系. 大豆科学,2007, 26(2): 127-133.

Liu Y, Gai J Y, Lü H N. Genetic variation of root traits at seedling stage and their relationship with stress tolerance in soybean. Soybean Science, 2007, 26(2): 127-133. (in Chinese)

[19]周蓉, 陈海峰, 王贤智, 伍宝朵, 陈水莲, 张晓娟, 吴学军, 杨中路, 邱德珍, 江木兰, 周新安. 大豆幼苗根系性状的QTL分析. 作物学报, 2011, 37(7): 1151-1158.

Zhou R, Chen H F, Wang X Z, Wu B D, Chen S L, Zhang X J, Wu X J, Yang Z L, Qiu D Z, Jiang M L, Zhou X A. QTL analysis of root traits of soybean at seedling stage, Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(7): 1151-1158. (in Chinese)

[20]Wang S C, Basten C J, Zeng Z B. Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5 User Manual. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 2005.

[21]盖钧镒, 章元明, 王建康. 植物数量性状遗传体系. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.

Gai J Y, Zhang Y M, Wang J K. Genetic System of Quantitative Traits in Plants. Beijing: Science Press, 2001. (in Chinese)

[22]Tang Q Y, Zhang C X. Data processing system (DPS) software with experimental design, statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research. Insect Science, 2013, 20: 254-260.

[23]王珍. 大豆SSR遗传图谱构建及重要农艺性状QTL分析[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2004.

Wang Z. Construction of soybean SSR based map and QTL analysis important agronomic traits [D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2004. (in Chinese)

[24]梁慧珍. 大豆子粒性状的遗传及QTL分析[D]. 西安: 西北农林科技大学, 2006.

Liang H Z. Genetic analysis and QTL mapping of seed traits in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] [D]. Xi’an: Northwest A&F University, 2006. (in Chinese)

[25]McCouch S R, Cho Y G, Yano M, Paul E, Blinstrub M, Morishima H, Kinoshita T. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genetics Newsletter, 1997, 14: 11-14.

[26]Price A H. Believe it or not, QTLs are accurate! Trends in Plant Science, 2006, 11: 213-216.

[27]Su C C, Cheng X N, Zhai H Q, Wan J M. Detection and analysis of QTL for resistance to the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal), in rice (Oryza sativa L.), using backcross inbred lines. Acta Genetica Sinica, 2002, 29: 332-338.

[28]左示敏, 殷跃军, 张丽, 张亚芳, 陈宗祥, 潘学彪. 水稻抗纹枯病QTL qSB-11的育种价值及其进一步定位. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(2): 136-142.

Zuo S M, Yin Y J, Zhang L, Zhang Y F, Chen Z X, Pan X B. Breeding value and further mapping of a QTL qSB-11 conferring the rice sheath blight resistance. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2007, 21(2): 136-142. (in Chinese)

[29]Beaver J S, Osorno J M. Achievements and limitations of contemporary common bean breeding using conventional and molecular approaches. Euphytica, 2009, 168: 145-175.

[30]Swarbrick P J, Scholes J D, Press M C, Slate J. A major QTL for resistance of rice to the parasitic plant Striga hermonthica is not dependent on genetic background. Pest Management Science, 2009, 65: 528-532.

[31]Blair M W, Sandoval T A, Caldas G V, Beebe S E, Paez M I. Quantitative trait locus analysis of seed phosphorus and seed phytate content in a recombinant inbred line population of common bean. Crop Science, 2009, 49: 237-246.

[32]Sabouri H. QTL detection of rice grain quality traits by microsatellite markers using an indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) combination. Journal of Genetics, 2009, 88: 81-85.

[33]杨守萍, 陈加敏, 何小红, 喻德跃, 盖钧镒. 大豆苗期耐旱性与部分根系性状的遗传. 大豆科学, 2005, 24(4): 275-280.

Yang S P, Chen J M, He X H, Yu D Y, Gai J Y. Inheritance of drought tolerance and root traits of seedling in soybean. Soybean Science, 2005, 24(4): 275-280. (in Chinese)

[34]Williams B, Stella K K, Khalid M, Robert G, Abdelali B, David A L, My A K. Genetic analysis of root and shoot traits in the ‘Essex’ by ‘Forrest’ recombinant inbred line (RIL) population of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Journal of Plant Genome Sciences, 2012, 1(1): 1-9.

[35]Liang Q, Cheng X H, Mei M T, Yan X L, Liao H. QTL analysis of root traits as related to phosphorus efficiency in soybean. Annals of Botany, 2010, 106: 223-234.

[36]Antonio J D V, Dario A O, Tais C B S, Ivan S, Newton D P, Carlos A M, Everaldo G B, Maurilio A M. Use of the QTL pproach to the study of soybean trait relationships in two populations of recombinant inbred lines at the F7 and F8 generations. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2006, 18(2): 281-290.

[37]王金社, 李海旺, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 重组自交家系群体4对主基因加多基因混合遗传模型分离分析方法的建立. 作物学报, 2010, 36(2): 191-201.

Wang J S, Li H W, Zhao T J, Gai J Y. Establishment of segregation analysis of mixed inheritance model with four major genes plus polygenes in recombinant inbred lines population. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(2): 191-201. (in Chinese)
[1] CHEN JiHao, ZHOU JieGuang, QU XiangRu, WANG SuRong, TANG HuaPing, JIANG Yun, TANG LiWei, $\boxed{\hbox{LAN XiuJin}}$, WEI YuMing, ZHOU JingZhong, MA Jian. Mapping and Analysis of QTL for Embryo Size-Related Traits in Tetraploid Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 203-216.
[2] DONG YongXin,WEI QiWei,HONG Hao,HUANG Ying,ZHAO YanXiao,FENG MingFeng,DOU DaoLong,XU Yi,TAO XiaoRong. Establishment of ALSV-Induced Gene Silencing in Chinese Soybean Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1710-1722.
[3] ZHAO HaiXia,XIAO Xin,DONG QiXin,WU HuaLa,LI ChengLei,WU Qi. Optimization of Callus Genetic Transformation System and Its Application in FtCHS1 Overexpression in Tartary Buckwheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1723-1734.
[4] LI YiLing,PENG XiHong,CHEN Ping,DU Qing,REN JunBo,YANG XueLi,LEI Lu,YONG TaiWen,YANG WenYu. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Application on Leaf Stay-Green, Photosynthetic Characteristics and System Yield in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1749-1762.
[5] GUO ShiBo,ZHANG FangLiang,ZHANG ZhenTao,ZHOU LiTao,ZHAO Jin,YANG XiaoGuang. The Possible Effects of Global Warming on Cropping Systems in China XIV. Distribution of High-Stable-Yield Zones and Agro-Meteorological Disasters of Soybean in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1763-1780.
[6] TANG HuaPing,CHEN HuangXin,LI Cong,GOU LuLu,TAN Cui,MU Yang,TANG LiWei,LAN XiuJin,WEI YuMing,MA Jian. Unconditional and Conditional QTL Analysis of Wheat Spike Length in Common Wheat Based on 55K SNP Array [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1492-1502.
[7] MA XiaoYan,YANG Yu,HUANG DongLin,WANG ZhaoHui,GAO YaJun,LI YongGang,LÜ Hui. Annual Nutrients Balance and Economic Return Analysis of Wheat with Fertilizers Reduction and Different Rotations [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1589-1603.
[8] SONG SongQuan,LIU Jun,TANG CuiFang,CHENG HongYan,WANG WeiQing,ZHANG Qi,ZHANG WenHu,GAO JiaDong. Research Progress on the Physiology and Its Molecular Mechanism of Seed Desiccation Tolerance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1047-1063.
[9] WANG Kai,ZHANG HaiLiang,DONG YiXin,CHEN ShaoKan,GUO Gang,LIU Lin,WANG YaChun. Definition and Genetic Parameters Estimation for Health Traits by Using on-Farm Management Data in Dairy Cattle [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1227-1240.
[10] ZHAO Ling, ZHANG Yong, WEI XiaoDong, LIANG WenHua, ZHAO ChunFang, ZHOU LiHui, YAO Shu, WANG CaiLin, ZHANG YaDong. Mapping of QTLs for Chlorophyll Content in Flag Leaves of Rice on High-Density Bin Map [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 825-836.
[11] MA HongXiang, WANG YongGang, GAO YuJiao, HE Yi, JIANG Peng, WU Lei, ZHANG Xu. Review and Prospect on the Breeding for the Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight in Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 837-855.
[12] WANG HuiLing, YAN AiLing, SUN Lei, ZHANG GuoJun, WANG XiaoYue, REN JianCheng, XU HaiYing. eQTL Analysis of Key Monoterpene Biosynthesis Genes in Table Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 977-990.
[13] CHEN XueSen, YIN HuaLin, WANG Nan, ZHANG Min, JIANG ShengHui, XU Juan, MAO ZhiQuan, ZHANG ZongYing, WANG ZhiGang, JIANG ZhaoTao, XU YueHua, LI JianMing. Interpretation of the Case of Bud Sports Selection to Promote the High-Quality and Efficient Development of the World’s Apple and Citrus Industry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 755-768.
[14] JIANG FenFen, SUN Lei, LIU FangDong, WANG WuBin, XING GuangNan, ZHANG JiaoPing, ZHANG FengKai, LI Ning, LI Yan, HE JianBo, GAI JunYi. Geographic Differentiation and Evolution of Photo-Thermal Comprehensive Responses of Growth-Periods in Global Soybeans [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 451-466.
[15] LIU Jin,HU JiaXiao,MA XiaoDing,CHEN Wu,LE Si,JO Sumin,CUI Di,ZHOU HuiYing,ZHANG LiNa,SHIN Dongjin,LI MaoMao,HAN LongZhi,YU LiQin. Construction of High Density Genetic Map for RIL Population and QTL Analysis of Heat Tolerance at Seedling Stage in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4327-4341.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!