Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2012, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (23): 4891-4897.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.23.016

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·RESOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Variation Characteristics of Raw Milk Composition and Curve Models of Chinese Holstein in the City of Tianjin

 XIONG  Ben-Hai, MA  Yi, PANG  Zhi-Hong, YANG  Lu, YI  Miao, YANG  Qin   

  1. 1.Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193
    2.Tianjin City Dairy Cattle Development Center, Tianjin 300384
  • Received:2012-04-23 Online:2012-12-01 Published:2012-07-31

Abstract: 【Objective】 To fulfill the need of seasonal management modification of lactating cows. 【Method】 the effect of natural month, parity, and their interaction on milk components were analyzed in the present study. Data were collected from a DHI database of lactating Chinese Holstein cows in the north part of china. Original data were screened and group according to parity (1-4). A total of 6114 milk protein content records and 5871 milk fat content records were analyzed by GLM procedure of SAS. 【Result】The Duncan multiple comparison of natural months, regardless of parity (only parity 1 to 4), demonstrated that the milk compositions of different months showed significant difference (P<0.05), although the data between some different months showed no significant difference. The milk protein percentage in September reached the highest (3.187%), and in July the lowest (3.016%). Milk fat percentage in February was the highest (4.137%), and in July the lowest (3.845%).The same multiple comparison of different parity, also regardless of different months (1-12 months), demonstrated that the milk composition data of different parities showed significant difference (P<0.05), although the data between some parities showed no significant difference. The milk protein percentage reached the highest in parity 2 (3.114%), and the lowest in parity 4 (3.066%). The milk fat percentage reached highest in parity 2 (3.983%) and parity 3 (3.973%), respectively; and the lowest in parity 4 (3.923%). In addition, the relation equation between the milk protein percentage (MPP, %) or the milk fat percentage (MFP, %) of different parities and the natural months in mixed cow herd was built using Model Wood, i.e. MPP=3.094x-0.0464×e0.0117x, MFP=4.2116x-0.0344×e0.0276x, x as month. 【Conclusion】The natural months, milking parities and their interaction had significant affects on milk composition including milk protein percentage and milk fat percentage, and milk composition had wood pattern changing relationship with natural months respectively.

Key words: Holstein cows , milk compositions , natural months , lactation parity , model

[1]齐利枝, 闫素梅, 生  冉, 敖长金. 奶牛乳腺中乳成分前体物对乳成分影响的研究进展. 动物营养学报, 2011, 23(12): 2077-2083.

Qi L Z, Yan S M, Sheng R, Ao C J. Effects of milk component precursors on milk composition synthesis in the mammary gland of dairy cows: a review. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2011, 23(12): 2077-2083. (in Chinese)

[2]http://www.foodjx.com/news/Detail/71745.html, 2011.

[3]易  渺, 熊本海. 从小型奶牛场生产情况看《生乳》新标准. 中国乳业, 2011(12): 14-16.

Yi M, Xiong B H. Some thinking on new standard of raw milk from a small dairy farm production. China Dairy, 2011(12): 14-16. (in Chinese )

[4]Heck J M L, van Valenberg H J F, Dijkstra J, van Hooijdonk A C M. Seasonal variation in the Dutch bovine raw milk composition. Journal of Dairy Science, 2012, 92(10): 4745-4755.

[5]Maurice-Van Eijndhoven M H T, Hiemstra S J, Calus M P L. Short communication: milk fat composition of 4 cattle breeds in the Netherlands. Journal of Dairy Science, 2011, 94(2): 1021-1025.

[6]Quist M A, LeBlanc S J, Hand K J, Lazenby D, Miglior F,  Kelton D F. Milking-to-milking variability for milk yield, fat and protein percentage, and somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008, (91): 3412-3423. 

[7]Giuseppe P, Anna N, Gianni B, Antonello C. Effects of nutrition on the contents of fat, protein, somatic cells, aromatic compounds, and undesirable substances in sheep milk. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2006, 131: 255-291.

[8]Martin O, Sauvant D. Metaanalysis of input/output kinetics in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2002, 85(12): 3363-3381.

[9]常玲玲, 杨章平, 陈仁金, 毛永江, 周里根, 王建勇, 尹兆华. 南方集约化饲养条件下荷斯坦奶牛乳脂肪率和乳蛋白率变化规律的初步研究. 中国畜牧杂志, 2010, 46(1): 23-27.

Chang L L, Yang Z P, Chen Y J, Mao Y J, Zhou L G, Wang J Y, Yin Z H. Study on variation features of milk fat percentage and milk protein percentage of Holstein Dairy cattle on intensive feeding method in the south of China. Journal of China Animal Husbandry, 2010, 46(1): 23-27. (in Chinese)

[10]白云峰, 谷子林, 霍贵成. 基于DHI模式奶牛生产管理专家系统. 畜牧与兽医, 2005, 37(11): 31-37.

Bai Y F, Gu Z L, He G C. A expert system of production management of dairy cattle based on DHI pattern. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2005, 37(11): 31-37. (in Chinese)

[11]王林波, 俞春华, 沈  忠, 张  静. DHI在湖北奶牛业中的应用. 湖北畜牧兽医, 2011(11): 8-10.

Wang L B, Yu C H, Shen Z, Zhang J. DHI application in the dairy of HuBei province. HuBei Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2011(11): 8-10. (in Chinese)

[12]熊本海, 马  毅, 罗清尧, 庞之洪, 邓  文. 中国荷斯坦奶牛第三泌乳期泌乳曲线模型的研究. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(2): 402-408.

Xiong B H, Ma Y, Luo Q Y, Pang Z H, Deng W. Study on lactation curve models of Chinese Holstein for the third parity. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(2): 402-408. (in Chinese)

[13]National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle: Seventh Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.

[14]中华人民共和国农业部. 奶牛饲养标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.

Ministry of Agriculture of People’s Republic of China. Feeding Standard of Dairy Cattle. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005. (in Chinese)

[15]熊本海, 庞之洪, 罗清尧. 中国饲料成分及营养价值表. 第19版. 中国饲料, 2008(21): 32-38; (22): 31-40.

Xiong B H, Pang Z H, Luo Q Y. Tables of feed composition and nutritive values in China. Version 19. China Feed, 2008(21): 32-38; (22): 31-40. (in Chinese)

[16]SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. The SAS System for Windows. Version 8.01, 1999. 

[17]Wood P D P. Algebraic model of the lactation curve in cattle. Nature, 1967, 216(10): 164-165.

[18]Dijkstra J, France J, Dhanoa M S, Maas J A, Hangan M D, Rook A J, Beever D E. A model to describe growth patterns of the mammary gland during pregnancy and lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 1997, 80(10): 2340-2354.

[19]中华人民共和国卫生部. 生乳(GB 19301-2010). 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.

Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Rawmilk (GB 19301-2010). Beijing: China Standard Press, 2010. (in Chinese)

[20]Michiru F, Hideharu T, Takami K, Akihisa Y. Effect of lactation stage, season and parity on milk cortisol concentration in Holstein cows. Livestock Science, 2008, 113(2/3): 280-284.

[21]Sevi A, Taibi L, Albenzio M, Muscio A, Annicchiarico G. Effect of parity on milk yield, composition, somatic cell count, renneting parameters and bacteria counts of Comisana ewes. Small Ruminant Research, 2000, 37(1/2): 99-107.

[22]Gil M M, Brandão T R S, Silva C L M. A modified Gompertz model to predict microbial inactivation under time-varying temperature conditions. Journal of Food Engineering, 2006, 76(1): 89-94.
[1] ZHAO ZhengXin,WANG XiaoYun,TIAN YaJie,WANG Rui,PENG Qing,CAI HuanJie. Effects of Straw Returning and Nitrogen Fertilizer Types on Summer Maize Yield and Soil Ammonia Volatilization Under Future Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(1): 104-117.
[2] HAN XiaoTong,YANG BaoJun,LI SuXuan,LIAO FuBing,LIU ShuHua,TANG Jian,YAO Qing. Intelligent Forecasting Method of Rice Sheath Blight Based on Images [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1557-1567.
[3] WANG YangYang,LIU WanDai,HE Li,REN DeChao,DUAN JianZhao,HU Xin,GUO TianCai,WANG YongHua,FENG Wei. Evaluation of Low Temperature Freezing Injury in Winter Wheat and Difference Analysis of Water Effect Based on Multivariate Statistical Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1301-1318.
[4] WANG ShuHui,TAO Wen,LIANG Shuo,ZHANG XuBo,SUN Nan,XU MingGang. The Spatial Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration and N2O Emission with Long-Term Manure Fertilization Scenarios from Dry Land in North China Plain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1159-1171.
[5] SHI Xi, NING LiHua, GE Min, WU Qi, ZHAO Han. Screening and Application of Biomarkers Related to Maize Nitrogen Status [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 438-450.
[6] WANG ShuTing,KONG YuGuang,ZHANG Zan,CHEN HongYan,LIU Peng. SPAD Value Inversion of Cotton Leaves Based on Satellite-UAV Spectral Fusion [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4823-4839.
[7] DENG YuanJian,CHAO Bo. Provincial Agricultural Ecological Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in China from the Perspective of Grey Water Footprint [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4879-4894.
[8] XIANG YuTing, WANG XiaoLong, HU XinZhong, REN ChangZhong, GUO LaiChun, LI Lu. Lipase Activity Difference of Oat Varieties and Prediction of Low Lipase Activity Variety with High Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4104-4117.
[9] HUANG Chong,HOU XiangJun. Crop Classification with Time Series Remote Sensing Based on Bi-LSTM Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4144-4157.
[10] ZHANG Jie,WANG Chuan,DONG XiaoXia,ZHU WenQi,YUE HuiLi,LIU ShengPing,ZHOU QingBo. Development and Application of Rapid Investigation and Analysis Platform for Agricultural and Rural Information Based on Fission Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4158-4174.
[11] XIA YuXin,LIANG Yan,WANG HaiYang,GUO MengLing,ZHOU Bu,DAI Xu,YANG ZhangPing,MAO YongJiang. Effects of the Number of Subclinical Mastitis and Somatic Cell Score in Milk of Parity 1 on Somatic Cell Score of Holstein Cows for Parity 2 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4052-4064.
[12] SU YuanYuan,ZHANG DeQuan,GU MingHui,ZHANG ChunJuan,LI ShaoBo,ZHENG XiaoChun,CHEN Li. Characterization of Chilled Mutton by ATP from Different Sources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3841-3853.
[13] HU ZhiQiang,SONG XiaoYu,QIN Lin,LIU Hui. Study on Seasonal Grazing Management Optimal Model in Alpine Desert Steppe [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3862-3874.
[14] WANG QiaoJuan,HE Hong,LI Liang,ZHANG Chao,CAI HuanJie. Research on Soybean Irrigation Schedule Based on AquaCrop Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3365-3379.
[15] GUO Can,YUE XiaoFeng,BAI YiZhen,ZHANG LiangXiao,ZHANG Qi,LI PeiWu. Research on the Application of a Balanced Sampling-Random Forest Early Warning Model for Aflatoxin Risk in Peanut [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3426-3436.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!