Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2012, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 675-684.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.04.008

• PLANT PROTECTION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Impact of Spraying Glyphosate on Growth and Yield Component of Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean at Different Growth Stages

 LIU  Wen-Juan, LIU  Yong, HUANG  Xiao-Qin, ZHOU  Xi-Quan, SONG  Jun, YIN  Quan, WANG  Dong, TAO  Li, ZHANG  Fu-Li, CHANG  Li-Juan, ZHANG  Lei, LEI  Shao-Rong   

  1. 1.四川省农业科学院分析测试中心，成都 610066
    2.四川省农业科学院植物保护所，成都 610066
  • Received:2011-06-03 Online:2012-02-15 Published:2011-11-30

PDF

868

Cited

3

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objective of this study is to research the impact of glyphosate on growth and fecundity of glyphosate-tolerant soybean and to provide statistics and a theoretical basis of time and concentration for weeding control by glyphosate.【Method】A random complete block design was used and the influence of spraying 41% glyphosate isopropylammonium AS at different rates on growth and yield component of transgenic soybean cultivar GTS-40-3-2 at V1-V5 stages was studied in the field. Also, the effect of glyphosate on weeding control was investigated. 【Result】 It was found that glyphosate was effective at 1.23-12.30 kg•ai•hm-2 to control weed. However, the glyphosate more than recommended rate of 1.23-2.46 kg•ai•hm-2 depressed the number of stem nods and compound leaves, and reduced the number of seeds and seeds weight per plant of GTS-40-3-2. There were no obviously negative influence of spraying glyphosate on number of effective pods per plant and 100-seed-weight of GTS-40-3-2, and the main agronomic traits related to yield including plant height, pod height and number of effective embranchments even increased after dealing with glyphosate at lower concentration. There were different effects of spraying glyphosate on growth and fecundity of GTS-40-3-2 at different growth stages. Glyphosate of 4.92-7.38 kg•ai•hm-2 restrained distinctly soybean growth and yield on V1 and V2 stages, but did not injure yield component at V3-V5 stages. The stem nodes and leaves of GTS-40-3-2 were decreased in 10-20 days after treatment (DAT) with glyphosate at V3-V5 stages, then returned to control in 30 d. Glyphosate at 9.84-12.30 kg•ai•hm-2 reduced the number of seeds and seed weight per plant of GTS-40-3-2 at V4 and V5 stages, but did not affect them at V3 stage.【Conclusion】 Spraying glyphosate at 1.23-2.46 kg•ai•hm-2 not only was available for weeding control but also maintained the growth and yield component of GTS-40-3-2, which could be safe to use at V1-V5 growth stages of the glyphosate-tolerant soybean. Application of gyphosate beyond 1.23-2.46 kg•ai•hm-2 depressed the seed number but did not affect the seed mass of GTS-40-3-2. There were differences in growth and yield component depression by glyphosate between growth stages of GTS-40-3-2. Soybean at V1 and V2 stages was more sensitive to glyphosate than V3-V5. It was most safe to spray glyphosate at V3 stage compared with other stages in consideration of soybean growth and fecundity.         

Key words: glyphosate-tolerant soybean, glyphosate isopropylammonium AS, growth, yield component

[1]Phillip A C. RAPD analysis of seed purity in a commercial hybrid cabbage (Brassica oleraca var. Capital) cultivar. Genome, 2000, 43(2): 317-321.

[2]Schönbrunn E, Eschenburg S, Shuttleworth W A, Schloss J V, Amrhein N, Evans J N S, Kabsch W. Interaction of the herbicide glyphosate with its target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase in atomic detail. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001, 98(4): 1376-1380.

[3]Dill G M. Glyphosate-resistant crops: history, status and future. Pest Management Science, 2005, 61(3): 219-224.

[4]Roberts R K, Pendergrass R, Hayes R M. Economic analysis of alternative herbicide regimes on roundup ready soybeans. Journal of Production Agriculture, 1999, 12(3): 449-454. 

[5]Webster E P, Bryant K J, Earnest L D. Weed control and economics in nontransgenic and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology, 1999, 13(3): 586-593.

[6]Reddy K N. Glyphosate-resistant soybean as a weed management tool: opportunities and challenges. Weed Biology and Management, 2001, 1(4): 193-202. 

[7]Heatherly L G, Elmore C D, Spurlock S R. Weed management systems for conventional and glyphosate-resistant soybean with and without irrigation. Agronomy Journal, 2002, 94(6): 1419-1428. 

[8]Heatherly L G, Spurlock S R, Reddy K N. Weed management in nonirrigated glyphosate-resistant and non-resistant soybean following deep and shallow fall tillage. Agronomy Journal, 2004, 96(3): 742-749.

[9]Shaner D L. Role of translocation as a mechanism of resistance to glyphesate. Weed Science, 2009, 57(1): 118-123.

[10]沈晓峰, 栾凤侠, 陶  波. 抗草甘膦转基因大豆生物与环境安全 性. 东北农业大学学报, 2007, 38(3): 401-404.

Shen X F, Luan F X, Tao B. Biosafety and environmental safety of genetic modified soybean resistant to glyphosate. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2007, 38(3): 401-404. (in Chinese)

[11]Reddy K N, Hoagland R E, Zablotowicz R M. Effect of glyphosate on growth, chlorophyll, and nodulation in glyphosate-resistant and susceptible soybean (Glycine max) varieties. Journal of New Seeds, 2001, 2(3): 37-52.  

[12]Reddy K N, Rimando A M, Duke S O. Aminomethylphosphonic acid, a metabolite of glyphosate, causes injury in glyphosate-treated, glyphosate-resistant soybean. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2004, 52(16): 5139-5143.

[13]卜贵军, 刘洪梅, 李  英, 崔  琳, 王学东. 草甘膦对大豆超微结构及光合指标影响的研究. 电子显微学报, 2008, 27(4): 322-330.

Bu G J, Liu H M, Li Y, Cui L, Wang X D. Soybean ultrastructure and photosynthesis index as affected by glyphosate. Journal of Chinese Electron Microscopy Society, 2008, 27(4): 322-330. (in Chinese)

[14]Zobiole L H S, Oliveira Jr R S, Visentainer J V, Kremer R J, Bellaloui N, Yamada T. Glyphosate affects seed composition in glyphosate- resistant soybean. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2010, 58(7): 4517-4522.

[15]Zablotowicz R M, Reddy K N. Nitrogenase activity, nitrogen content, and yield responses to glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Crop Protection, 2007, 26(3): 370-376.

[16]Krausz R F, Young B G. Response of glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) to trimethylsulfonium and isopropylamine salts of glyphosate. Weed Technology, 2001, 15(4): 745-749. 

[17]Reddy K N, Zablotowicz R M. Glyphosate-resistant soybean response to various salts of glyphosate and glyphosate accumulation in soybean nodules. Weed Science, 2003, 51(4): 496-502.

[18]Elmore R W, Roeth F W, Klein R N, Knezevic S Z, Martin A, Nelson L A, Shapiro C A. Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar response to glyphosate. Agronomy Journal, 2001, 93(2): 404-407.

[19]Benbrook C. Evidence of the magnitude and consequences of the Roundup Ready soybean yield drag from university-based varietal trials in 1998. Ag BioTech InfoNet Technical Paper Number 1, 1999.

[20]Elmore R W, Roeth F W, Nelson L A, Shapiro C A, Klein R        N, Knezevic S Z, Martin A. Glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivar yields compared with sister lines. Agronomy Journal, 2001, 93(2): 408-412.

[21]Nelson K A, Renner K A. Soybean growth and development as affected by glyphosate and postemergence herbicide tank mixtures. Agronomy Journal, 2001, 93(2): 428-434.

[22]Young B G, Young J M, Matthews J L, Owen M D K, Zelaya L A, Hartzler R G, Wax L M, Rorem K W, Bollero G A. Soybean development and yield as affected by three postemergence herbicides. Agronomy Journal, 2003, 95(5): 1152-1156.

[23]Lamb D C, Kelly D E, Hanley S Z, Mehmood Z, Kelly S L. Glyphosate is an inhibitor of plant cytochrome P450: functional expression of Thlaspi arvensae cytochrome P45071B1/reductase fusion protein in Escherichia coli. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1998, 244(1): 110-114.

[24]King C A, Purcell L C, Vories E D. Plant growth and nitrogenase activity of glyphosate-tolerant soybean in response to foliar glyphosate applications. Agronomy Journal, 2001, 93(1): 179-186.

[25]原向阳, 郭平毅, 张丽光, 王  鑫, 姚满生, 王宏富. 第三复叶期喷施草甘膦对转基因大豆和普通大豆生理指标的影响. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(11): 3886-3892.

Yuan X Y, Guo P Y, Zhang L G, Wang X, Yao M S, Wang H F. Impact of glyphosate on physiological index of transgenic and conventional soybean on three-trifoliolate leaf stage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(11): 3886-3892. (in Chinese)

[26]原向阳, 郭平毅, 张丽光, 王  鑫, 赵  锐, 姚满生, 王宏富. 不同时期喷施草甘膦对大豆生理指标的影响. 中山大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 48(2): 90-94.

Yuan X Y, Guo P Y, Zhang L G, Wang X, Zhao R, Yao M S, Wang H F. Impact of spraying glyphosate on physiological index of soybean at different growth stage. Acta Scientiarum Naturalun Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2009, 48(2): 90-94. (in Chinese)
[1] WANG XuanDong, SONG Zhen, LAN HeTing, JIANG YingZi, QI WenJie, LIU XiaoYang, JIANG DongHua. Isolation of Dominant Actinomycetes from Soil of Waxberry Orchards and Its Disease Prevention and Growth-Promotion Function [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 275-286.
[2] XIONG ShuPing,GAO Ming,ZHANG ZhiYong,QIN BuTan,XU SaiJun,FU XinLu,WANG XiaoChun,MA XinMing. Spatial and Temporal Difference Analysis of Wheat Yield and Yield Components in Henan Province Based on GIS [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 692-706.
[3] JIANG FenFen, SUN Lei, LIU FangDong, WANG WuBin, XING GuangNan, ZHANG JiaoPing, ZHANG FengKai, LI Ning, LI Yan, HE JianBo, GAI JunYi. Geographic Differentiation and Evolution of Photo-Thermal Comprehensive Responses of Growth-Periods in Global Soybeans [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 451-466.
[4] CHE DaLu,ZHAO LiChen,CHENG SuCai,LIU AiYu,LI XiaoYu,ZHAO ShouPei,WANG JianCheng,WANG Yuan,GAO YuHong,SUN XinSheng. Effect of Litter Bed on Growth Performance and Odor Emission in Fattening Lamb [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4943-4956.
[5] WANG ZhePeng,ZHOU WenXin,HE JunXi,HU QiaoYan,ZHAO JiaYue. Association of Levels of Cholecystokinin A Receptor Expression and Sequence Variants with Feed Conversion Efficiency of Lueyang Black-Boned Chicken [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4539-4549.
[6] ZHU ChangWei,MENG WeiWei,SHI Ke,NIU RunZhi,JIANG GuiYing,SHEN FengMin,LIU Fang,LIU ShiLiang. The Characteristics of Soil Nutrients and Soil Enzyme Activities During Wheat Growth Stage Under Different Tillage Patterns [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4237-4251.
[7] LI Gang,BAI Yang,JIA ZiYing,MA ZhengYang,ZHANG XiangChi,LI ChunYan,LI Cheng. Phosphorus Altered the Response of Ionomics and Metabolomics to Drought Stress in Wheat Seedlings [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 280-294.
[8] MengQi WANG,Na MI,Jing WANG,YuShu ZHANG,RuiPeng JI,NiNa CHEN,XiaXia LIU,Ying HAN,WangYiPu LI,JiaYing ZHANG. Simulation of Canopy Silking Dynamic and Kernel Number of Spring Maize Under Drought Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3530-3542.
[9] LIU WangJing,TANG DeFu,AO ChangJin. Effect of Allium mongolicum Regel and Its Extracts on the Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality and Serum Biochemical Indices of Captive Small-Tailed Han Sheep [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3461-3472.
[10] GUO ShuQing,SONG Hui,CHAI ShaoHua,GUO Yan,SHI Xing,DU LiHong,XING Lu,XIE HuiFang,ZHANG Yang,LI Long,FENG BaiLi,LIU JinRong,YANG Pu. QTL Analysis for Growth Period and Panicle-Related Traits in Foxtail Millet [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 2883-2898.
[11] CHEN ZhiMin,CHANG WenHuan,ZHENG AiJuan,CAI HuiYi,LIU GuoHua. Effect of Expanded Feather Powder on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance and Serum Biochemical Index of Broiler [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2643-2653.
[12] WANG Juan, MA XiaoMei, ZHOU XiaoFeng, WANG Xin, TIAN Qin, LI ChengQi, DONG ChengGuang. Genome-Wide Association Study of Yield Component Traits in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2265-2277.
[13] GONG XiaoYa,SHI JiBo,FANG Ling,FANG YaPeng,WU FengZhi. Effects of Flooding on Soil Chemical Properties and Microbial Community Composition on Farmland of Continuous Cropped Pepper [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2472-2484.
[14] FANG TaoHong,ZHANG Min,MA ChunHua,ZHENG XiaoChen,TAN WenJing,TIAN Ran,YAN Qiong,ZHOU XinLi,LI Xin,YANG SuiZhuang,HUANG KeBing,WANG JianFeng,HAN DeJun,WANG XiaoJie,KANG ZhenSheng. Application of Yr52 Gene in Wheat Improvement for Stripe Rust Resistance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2077-2091.
[15] LIANG Peng,ZHANG TianWen,MENG Ke,SHAO ShunCheng,ZOU ShiFan,RONG Xuan,QIANG Hao,FENG DengZhen. Association Analysis of the ADIPOQ Variation with Sheep Growth Traits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2239-2256.
Viewed
Full text
218
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 0 0 0 218

  From Others local
  Times 140 78
  Rate 64% 36%

Abstract
260
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 260
  From Others local
  Times 238 22
  Rate 92% 8%

Cited
Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备09089781号-30
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Tel: 86-010-82106279    E-mail: zgnykx@mail.caas.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd