环青海湖地区不同饲用燕麦品种生产性能和营养品质综合评价

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.19.002

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】In order to explore the adaptability of 10 oat (Avena sativa) varieties in the Qinghai Lake area and screen out the high-yield and high-quality oat varieties suitable for planting in this area, so as to provide data support for high-yield and high-quality forage production in this area and similar areas. 【Method】In this study, 10 oat varieties (Avena sativa cv. Qinghai No.444, A. sativa cv. Baiyan No.7, A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.4, A. nuda cv. Qingyou No.3, A. sativa cv. Qingyin No.2, A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.3, A. sativa cv. Lena, A. sativa cv. Qinghai, A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.1 and A. sativa cv. Longyan No.1) commonly cultivated in Qinghai province were used. The experiment was established using a randomized complete block design. Three experimental blocks, located at least 3 m away from each other, were randomly chosen. Each block contained 10 different oat varieties plots, for a total of 30 plots. The area of each plot was 3 m × 5 m. The experiment was sown in strip. The row spacing was 25 cm and the sowing depth was 3-4 cm. According to the thousand seed weight, purity and germination rate of each variety, the seeding rate of each variety was calculated according to the seedling protection number of 6.75 million plants/hm². Moreover, the diammonium phosphate (150 kg·hm^-2) and urea (75 kg·hm^-2) were used as base fertilizer. The seeds were sown on May 16, 2022 and May 19, 2023, and field observations and sample collection were conducted on September 23, 2022 and September 26, 2023, respectively. The production performance and nutritional quality of oat varieties were analyzed, and the piecewise structural equation model was used to explore how varieties, planting years and their interactions affected nutritional quality via agronomic traits and yield traits. Furthermore, the multi-criterion decision model-TOPSIS (Technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal) was used to comprehensively evaluate the various indexes of the tested oat varieties. 【Result】Our results demonstrated that A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.3 had the highest plant height (89.4-92.5 cm), and the lowest acid detergent fiber (34.8%-34.9%) and neutral detergent fiber (51.8%-53.4%). The A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.4 had the most tillers number (2.7-3.6/plant) and the lowest crude ash content (10.9%-11.3%). The highest of forage yield, crude protein, relative feeding value were found in A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.3 and A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.4. while the stem/leaf ratio of the A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.3 and A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.4 were significantly lower than that of other varieties. The highest crude fat was found in A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.1 (3.8%-3.9%). The Pearson correlation analysis showed that the oat yield was positively correlated with crude protein content and relative feeding value, but negatively correlated with acid detergent fiber and crude ash. The stem/leaf ratio was positively correlated with acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber, but negatively correlated with crude protein and relative feeding value. The structural equation model analysis showed that the varieties, planting years and their interactions had direct effects on the oat nutritional quality, and indirectly affected the nutritional quality by affecting plant height, tillering number, stem/leaf ratio and hay yield. The total effect value of stem/leaf ratio was the highest, which was -0.37.【Conclusion】The comprehensive evaluation of TOPSIS model showed that A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.4 and A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.3 could not only maintain higher production performance, but also have higher nutritional quality, which are ideal oat varieties for planting in Qinghai Lake area.

Key words: Qinghai Lake area, oat, production performance, nutritional quality, comprehensive evaluation

WANG XiaoJun, WANG JinLan, JU ZeLiang, LIANG GuoLing, JIA ZhiFeng, LIU WenHui, MA Xiang, MA JinXiu, LI Wen. Comprehensive Evaluation on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Different Varieties of Forage Oat in the Qinghai Lake Area[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(19): 3730-3742.

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 1

Table 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

References 30

[1]	李凤霞, 伏洋, 杨琼, 颜亮东, 肖建设. 环青海湖地区气候变化及其环境效应. 资源科学, 2008, 30(3): 348-353.
	LI F X, FU Y, YANG Q, YAN L D, XIAO J S. Climate change and its environmental effects in the surrounding area of Qinghai Lake. Resources Science, 2008, 30(3): 348-353. (in Chinese)
[2]	马延东, 赵景波, 邵天杰, 邢闪. 青海环湖地区草原土壤含水量及富集规律. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(10): 1982-1995. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.10.011.
	MA Y D, ZHAO J B, SHAO T J, XING S. Soil moisture and enrichment regularity of steppe soil in Qinghai Lake Area. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(10): 1982-1995. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.10.011. (in Chinese)
[3]	莫兴国, 刘文, 孟铖铖, 胡实, 刘苏峡, 林忠辉. 青藏高原草地产量与草畜平衡变化. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2415-2425. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.002
	MO X G, LIU W, MENG C C, HU S, LIU S X, LIN Z H. Variations of forage yield and forage-livestock balance in grasslands over the Tibetan Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(7): 2415-2425. (in Chinese)
[4]	任长忠, 胡跃高. 中国燕麦学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013.
	REN C Z, HU Y G. Chinese Oat Science. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2013. (in Chinese)
[5]	李峰, 李文龙, 张彩霞, 余奕东, 张吉明, 那亚, 陶雅. 鄂尔多斯地区春播燕麦饲用价值和生产力综合评价. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(12): 28-36.
	LI F, LI W L, ZHANG C X, YU Y D, ZHANG J M, NA Y, TAO Y. Comprehensive evaluation of feeding value and productivity of spring sown oats in Ordos Region. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(12): 28-36. (in Chinese)
[6]	李德明, 张榕, 武慧娟, 耿小丽, 刘乾. 天祝县高寒阴湿区35份燕麦主要性状的遗传多样性分析及生产性能综合评价. 草业科学, 2023, 40(12): 3114-3123.
	LI D M, ZHANG R, WU H J, GENG X L, LIU Q. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 35 oat varieties in high cold and humid areas of Tianzhu County. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(12): 3114-3123. (in Chinese)
[7]	李文, 魏廷虎, 阿保地, 永措巴占, 才仁塔次, 周玉海, 李文浩, 郭卫兴, 张雁平. 化肥减施配合有机肥对高寒区燕麦营养品质和土壤养分的影响. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2878-2886. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.12.030
	LI W, WEI T H, A B D, YONG C B Z, CAI R T C, ZHOU Y H, LI W H, GUO W X, ZHANG Y P. Effects of reduction of chemical fertilizer and organic manure supplement on oat nutrient quality and soil nutrient in alpine cold region. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2878-2886. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.12.030
[8]	李峰, 李文龙, 李雪, 张仲鹃, 白林坡, 赵雨霏, 陶雅. 黑龙江中南部16个饲用燕麦品种生产性能综合评价. 草业学报, 2023, 32(10): 82-92. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2022473
	LI F, LI W L, LI X, ZHANG Z J, BAI L P, ZHAO Y F, TAO Y. A multi-trait evaluation of the performance of 16 forage oat varieties in central and southern Heilongjiang Province. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(10): 82-92. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11686/cyxb2022473
[9]	景芳, 刘彦明, 南铭, 边芳, 任生兰, 陈富, 张成君. 12个燕麦品种在黄土高原沟壑区的生产性能及适应性. 草业科学, 2024, 41(5): 1175-1188.
	JING F, LIU Y M, NAN M, BIAN F, REN S L, CHEN F, ZHANG C J. Productive performance and adaptability of 12 oat varieties in the gully area of the Loess Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(5): 1175-1188. (in Chinese)
[10]	任春燕, 梁国玲, 刘文辉, 刘凯强, 段嘉蕾. 青藏高原高寒地区早熟燕麦资源筛选和适应性评价. 草业学报, 2023, 32(9): 116-129. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2022414
	REN C Y, LIANG G L, LIU W H, LIU K Q, DUAN J L. Screening and adaptability evaluation of early maturing oats in alpine regions of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(9): 116-129. (in Chinese)
[11]	魏希杰, 王伟, 马兴贇. 海北州8个燕麦品种评比试验. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2018, 48(4): 22-24.
	WEI X J, WANG W, MA X Y. Comparative test of eight oats varieties in Haibei prefecture. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2018, 48(4): 22-24. (in Chinese)
[12]	胡伟, 梁国玲, 刘凯强, 刘文辉, 李文. 青藏高原9个燕麦品种抗倒伏能力及其影响因素研究. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1788-1797. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.06.022
	HU W, LIANG G L, LIU K Q, LIU W H, LI W. Study on lodging resistance and its influencing factors of 9 oat varieties in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1788-1797. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.06.022
[13]	王凤宇, 梁国玲, 刘文辉. 590份燕麦种质资源营养器官表型性状遗传多样性分析. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 158-167. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.017
	WANG F Y, LIANG G L, LIU W H. Genetic diversity analysis of nutritional organs phenotype in 590 oat germplasms. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 158-167. (in Chinese)
[14]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO S D. Agrochemical Analysis of Soil. 3rd edition. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[15]	LINN J G, MARTIN N P. Forage quality analyses and interpretation. The Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice, 1991, 7(2): 509-523.
[16]	李晶, 南铭, 刘彦明, 张成君, 任生兰, 边芳. 不同燕麦品种产量和品质及饲喂性能综合评价. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1089-1098. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.04.018
	LI J, NAN M, LIU Y M, ZHANG C J, REN S L, BIAN F. Comprehensive evaluation of the yield, quality and feeding performance on different oat varieties. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1089-1098. (in Chinese)
[17]	S∅RENSEN E S, JANSEN C, WINDJU S, CROSSA J, SONESSON A K, LILLEMO M, ALSHEIKH M. Evaluation of strategies to optimize training populations for genomic prediction in oat (Avena sativa). Plant Breeding, 2023, 142(1): 41-53.
[18]	赵桂琴, 琚泽亮, 柴继宽. 海拔和品种对燕麦营养品质及表面附着微生物的影响. 草业学报, 2022, 31(11): 147-157. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021436
	ZHAO G Q, JU Z L, CHAI J K. Effects of altitude and variety on nutrient levels and epiphytes of oats. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 147-157. (in Chinese)
[19]	SHANG H M, TIAN Y, XU B, ZHOU H Z, ZHANG N Y. Reform and practice of ideological and political teaching in the course of processing and storage of forage crops. Region-Educational Research and Reviews, 2023, 5(3): 131-136.
[20]	吴海艳, 曲尼, 曲珍, 同桑措姆, 达娃卓嘎, 德央, 尼玛卓嘎, 刘昭明, 马玉寿. 6个燕麦品种在昂仁县的生产性能及饲草品质比较. 草业学报, 2022, 31(4): 72-80. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021318
	WU H Y, QU N, QU Z, TONG S C M, DA W Z G, DE Y, NI M Z G, LIU Z M, MA Y S. Comparison of crop yield and forage quality of six oat varieties in Angren County, Shigatse. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 72-80. (in Chinese)
[21]	王筱, 李夺, 潘翔磊, 陈菲儿, 梁庆伟, 王学敏. 赤峰半干旱区10个饲用燕麦品种适应性评价. 草业科学, 2023, 40(2): 521-529.
	WANG X, LI D, PAN X L, CHEN F E, LIANG Q W, WANG X M. Adaptability evaluation of 10 forage oat varieties in Chifeng semiarid area. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(2): 521-529. (in Chinese)
[22]	ZHANG X J, JIN W J, XU W T, LI X Y, SHANG Y, LI S, OUYANG H S. Comparison of five endogenous reference genes for specific PCR detection and quantification of rice. Rice Science, 2019, 26(4): 248-256. doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2019.04.005
[23]	李鸿飞, 周帮伟, 张淼, 施树楠, 李志坚. 不同燕麦品种在呼伦贝尔地区的引种适应性评价. 草业学报, 2024, 33(4): 60-72. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2023247
	LI H F, ZHOU B W, ZHANG M, SHI S N, LI Z J. Adaptability evaluation of different oat varieties introduced in the Hulunbuir region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 60-72. (in Chinese)
[24]	李文龙, 李峰, 张仲鹃, 王殿清, 王欢, 靳慧卿, 特木热, 胡志玲, 陶雅. 鄂尔多斯高原北部一年两季燕麦种植模式生产性能评价. 草业学报, 2024, 33(1): 159-168. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2023071
	LI W L, LI F, ZHANG Z J, WANG D Q, WANG H, JIN H Q, TE M R, HU Z L, TAO Y. A performance evaluation of two crops of forage oats per year in the northern Ordos Plateau. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 159-168. (in Chinese)
[25]	KUMHÁLOVÁ J, NOVÁK P, MADARAS M. Monitoring oats and winter wheat within-field spatial variability by satellite images. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 2018, 49(2): 127-135.
[26]	张睿, 韩重阳, 蔡家邦, 汪阳, 黄琳凯, 张新全, 聂刚. 6个苇状羊茅(型)品种在成都平原区的生产性能评价. 草业学报, 2024, 33(1): 138-148. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2023072
	ZHANG R, HAN C Y, CAI J B, WANG Y, HUANG L K, ZHANG X Q, NIE G. Evaluation of production performance of six Festuca arundinacea varieties in the Chengdu Plain. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 138-148. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11686/cyxb2023072
[27]	肖燕子, 徐丽君, 辛晓平, 乌仁其其格, 孙林, 姜超. 呼伦贝尔地区不同燕麦品种的营养价值及发酵品质评价研究. 草业学报, 2020, 29(12): 171-179. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020138
	XIAO Y Z, XU L J, XIN X P, WU R Q Q G, SUN L, JIANG C. Nutritional value and fermentation quality of different oat varieties in the Hulunbuir area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(12): 171-179. (in Chinese)
[28]	韩汝旦, 姬奇武, 董宽虎, 韩世洁, 尹雪红, 代烁. 4个白羊草居群产量及营养品质等特性的比较研究. 草地学报, 2016, 24(1): 204-209. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.028
	HAN R D, JI Q W, DONG K H, HAN S J, YIN X H, DAI S. Comparative study on yield and nutritional quality characteristics of four Bothriochloa ischaemum populations. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(1): 204-209. (in Chinese)
[29]	王运涛, 杨志敏, 刘建成, 李峰, 于林清, 远婷, 梁潇, 周文秀. 冀西北地区21个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1311-1318. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.016
	WANG Y T, YANG Z M, LIU J C, LI F, YU L Q, YUAN T, LIANG X, ZHOU W X. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of 21 oat varieties in northwest of Hebei Province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1311-1318. (in Chinese)
[30]	宋文学, 黄薇, 王旭成, 王琴, 王星, 王晶, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 鹅观草生产性能和营养成分综合评价. 草业科学, 2023, 40(3): 752-760.
	SONG W X, HUANG W, WANG X C, WANG Q, WANG X, WANG J, GAO X Q, FU B Z. Evaluation of Roegneria kamoji production performance and nutritional quality. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(3): 752-760. (in Chinese)

Related Articles 15

[1]	CUI JieHao, ZHANG Meng, WANG Qin, YU JiaYan, LIN Kun, LI ShangZe, LAN Heng, GENG YanQiu, ZHANG Qiang, GUO LiYing, SHAO XiWen. Evaluation of Lodging Resistance and Its Physiological Mechanisms in Japonica Rice Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1420-1438.
[2]	YUE LiXin, WANG QingHua, WANG ZhenBao, NIMAQIONGJI, LIU ZeZhou, KONG SuPing, ZHANG LiFeng, GAO LiMin. Widely Targeted Metabolomics-Based Analysis of the Differences in Tibetan Bunching Onion and Chive on Nutritional Quality and Flavonoid Metabolites [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1070-1086.
[3]	ZHANG LiDong, GUO YiCong, HUANG HongYu, NIE Jing, WANG Bing, LI MengYu, LI JiaWang, SUI XiaoLei, LI YuHe. Correlation Analysis of Cucumber Fruit Quality Integrating Sensory Evaluation with Nutritional Traits and Flavor Compound Characteristics [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1087-1100.
[4]	DONG JinLong, ZHAO Ying, YU HaiBing, LÜ JianYe, QIN JiaQi, LIANG Chen, MING Bo, LI ShaoKun. Multi-Model Elucidating of Nutritional Quality Contributions to Maize Kernel Test Weight and Regional Heterogeneity [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 985-995.
[5]	HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[6]	JIA ZiCheng, QIN BingYu, MA CaiYing, DU Yong, LIU TongGao, XUE RuiLin, WANG XiaoLong, ZHOU ShiWei. Effects of Diets with Different Nutritional Levels on Maternal-Infant Integrated Production Performance and Rumen Microorganisms of Double-Lamb Shanbei White Cashmere Goats [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 668-686.
[7]	JI ShengYang, LU BaiYi, LI PeiWu. Some Reflections on Modern Science of Agricultural Product Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1830-1844.
[8]	WANG Niu, SHI XinRan, ZHANG WeiDong, WANG Xin. Effect of FGF5 and FGF21 on Proliferation of Dermal Papilla Cells in Cashmere Goat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 819-830.
[9]	WANG JiaXin, HU JingYi, ZHANG Wei, WEI Qian, WANG Tao, WANG XiaoLin, ZHANG Xiong, ZHANG PanPan. Effects of Different Mulching Methods on the Production of Photosynthetic Substances and Water Use Efficiency of Intercropped Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(3): 460-477.
[10]	ZHANG Fan, TANG XiangFang, YANG Liang, WANG Hui, CHEN RuiPeng, XIONG BenHai. Research Progress of Intelligent Monitoring Technology for Beef Cattle Production Performance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 5081-5096.
[11]	CHEN TianXiao, CAO Rong, SONG QianNan, HU LiangLiang, WANG SuHua, WANG LiXia, CHENG XuZhen, CHEN HongLin. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance at the Seedling Stage and Screening of Tolerant Germplasm in Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4317-4332.
[12]	XU XiuYuan, ZHANG HongZhi, XU LiJun, XUE Wei, NIE YingYing, GUO MingYing, LI JinXia, ZHAO YaRu, SHI MingJiang. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Photosynthetic Carbon Allocation in Pasture Based on ¹³C Pulse-Labeling Experiments [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4346-4356.
[13]	TANG GuiMei, LI WeiDong, ZHOU YuXia, KONG YouHan, XIAO XiaoLing, PENG YingShu, ZHANG Li, FU HongYan, LIU Yang, HUANG GuoLin. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Cymbidium faberi Germplasm Resources Based on Phenotypic Traits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 339-354.
[14]	REN JiaHui, SUN JuanJuan, HAO YingLu, WANG FengWu, WANG JingYu, ZHANG MingWei, LI BaoHan, ZHENG ChengZhong, HE ZhuQing, WANG ZhaoLan. Screening of Feed Oat Varieties and Its Evaluation of Silage Quality in Central Inner Mongolia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(19): 4026-4038.
[15]	LI XiaoPeng, LIU YunLong, CUI JiaJun, TU Yan, JIANG LinShu, CHENG ShuRu. Effects of Chlorogenic Acid on Rumen Methane Emission, Fermentation Parameters and Performance of Late Lactating Cows Based on the GreenFeed System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(14): 2904-2913.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

编号 No.	品种 Variety	纯净度 Seed purity (%)	发芽率 Germination rate (%)	类型 Type	原产地 Origin
V1	青海444 A. sativa cv. Qinghai No.444	95.2	96	早熟Early maturity	丹麦Denmark
V2	白燕7号 A. sativa cv. Baiyan No.7	96.7	97	中熟Mid maturity	中国吉林Jilin, China
V3	青燕4号 A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.4	95.8	93	中晚熟Mid-late maturity	中国青海Qinghai, China
V4	青莜3号 A. nuda cv. Qingyou No.3	96.3	94	晚熟Late maturity	英国England
V5	青引2号 A. sativa cv. Qingyin No.2	96.4	95	早熟Early maturity	加拿大Canada
V6	青燕3号 A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.3	94.3	96	晚熟Late maturity	中国青海Qinghai, China
V7	林纳 A. sativa cv. Lena	94.7	95	中熟Mid maturity	挪威Norway
V8	青海甜燕麦 A. sativa cv. Qinghai	93.3	95	中熟Mid maturity	俄罗斯 Russia
V9	青燕1号 A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.1	95.5	94	早熟Early maturity	中国青海Qinghai, China
V10	陇燕1号 A. sativa cv. Longyan No.1	96.3	93	中熟Mid maturity	中国甘肃Gansu, China

品种 Varieties	生育时期<BOLD>G</BOLD>rowth period
品种 Varieties	2022	2023
青海444 A. sativa cv. Qinghai No.444	完熟期Full ripe stage	完熟期Full ripe stage
白燕7号A. sativa cv. Baiyan No.7	蜡熟期Dough stage	蜡熟期Dough stage
青燕4号A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.4	乳熟期Milk ripe stage	蜡熟期Dough stage
青莜3号A. nuda cv. Qingyou No.3	乳熟期Milk ripe stage	乳熟期Milk ripe stage
青引2号A. sativa cv. Qingyin No.2	完熟期Full ripe stage	完熟期Full ripe stage
青燕3号A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.3	乳熟期Milk ripe stage	乳熟期Milk ripe stage
林纳A. sativa cv. Lena	蜡熟期Dough stage	蜡熟期Dough stage
青海甜燕麦A. sativa cv. Qinghai	蜡熟期Dough stage	蜡熟期Dough stage
青燕1号A. sativa cv. Qingyan No.1	完熟期Full ripe stage	完熟期Full ripe stage
陇燕1号A. sativa cv. Longyan No.1	蜡熟期Dough stage	蜡熟期Dough stage

性状 Trait	因素 Factor	平方和 Sum of squares	自由度 Degrees of freedom	均方 Mean square	F	P
株高 Plant height (cm)	品种Variety	4524.75	9.00	502.75	10.55	0.00
	种植年份Planting year	66.99	1.00	66.99	1.41	0.24
	品种×年份Variety×Planting year	5055.54	9.00	561.73	11.79	0.00
分蘖数 Number of tillers	品种Variety	72.64	9.00	8.07	22.81	0.00
	种植年份Planting year	28.34	1.00	28.34	80.10	0.00
	品种×年份Variety×Planting year	12.08	9.00	1.34	3.79	0.00
干草产量 Hay yield (g·m^-2)	品种Variety	1604942.96	9.00	178327.00	34.89	0.00
	种植年份Planting year	54076.41	1.00	54076.41	10.58	0.00
	品种×年份Variety×Planting year	565302.89	9.00	62811.43	12.29	0.00
茎叶比 Stem/leaf ratio	品种Variety	0.34	9.00	0.04	72.64	0.00
	种植年份Planting year	0.06	1.00	0.06	119.94	0.00
	品种×年份Variety×Planting year	0.13	9.00	0.01	29.04	0.00

营养品质 Nutritional quality	因素 Factor	平方和 Sum of squares	自由度 Degrees of freedom	均方 Mean square	F	P
粗蛋白 CP (%)	品种Variety	21.44	9.00	2.38	9.43	0.00
	种植年份Planting year	2.83	1.00	2.83	11.20	0.00
	品种×年份Variety×Planting year	2.55	9.00	0.28	1.12	0.35
粗脂肪 CF (%)	品种Variety	6.83	9.00	0.76	11.09	0.00
	种植年份Planting year	0.23	1.00	0.23	3.41	0.07
	品种×年份Variety×Planting year	2.47	9.00	0.27	4.02	0.00
粗灰分 Ash (%)	品种Variety	84.04	9.00	9.34	7.14	0.00
	种植年份Planting year	0.01	1.00	0.01	0.01	0.92
	品种×年份Variety×Planting year	22.19	9.00	2.47	1.89	0.05
酸性洗涤纤维 ADF (%)	品种Variety	1170.44	9.00	130.05	9.86	0.00
	种植年份Planting year	10.41	1.00	10.41	0.79	0.37
	品种×年份Variety×Planting year	131.55	9.00	14.62	1.11	0.36
中性洗涤纤维 NDF (%)	品种Variety	2129.10	9.00	236.57	8.74	0.00
	种植年份Planting year	178.79	1.00	178.79	6.61	0.01
	品种×年份Variety×Planting year	431.53	9.00	47.95	1.77	0.07
相对饲用价值 RFV	品种Variety	15096.54	9.00	1677.39	15.37	0.00
	种植年份Planting year	272.17	1.00	272.17	2.49	0.12
	品种×年份Variety×Planting year	1925.57	9.00	213.95	1.96	0.04

Comprehensive Evaluation on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Different Varieties of Forage Oat in the Qinghai Lake Area

RichHTML

PDF