Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (8): 1590-1598.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.08.002

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

F1 Performance Prediction of Upland Cotton Based on Partial NCII Design

QIN HongDe1(),FENG ChangHui1,ZHANG YouChang1,BIE Shu1,ZHANG JiaoHai1,XIA SongBo1,WANG XiaoGang1,WANG QiongShan1,LAN JiaYang1,CHEN QuanQiu1,JIAO ChunHai2()   

  1. 1Institute of Cash Crops, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Breeding in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan 430064
    2Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064
  • Received:2020-11-08 Accepted:2020-12-02 Online:2021-04-16 Published:2021-04-25
  • Contact: ChunHai JIAO E-mail:qinhongde2002@163.com;jiaoch@hotmail.com

RichHTML

26

PDF

442

Abstract:

【Objective】Develop the method for predicting F1 performance of upland cotton, and reduce breeding cost and improve breeding efficiency. 【Method】A partial NCII population composed of 60 parents and 180 F1 crosses, and three prediction methods with parent additive effect (A), general combining ability (GCA) and mid-parent value (MP) were employed to predict F1 performance on yield and fiber quality traits. 【Result】The Heterosis of lint yield of upland cotton was obvious. All crosses showed 19.63% average mid-parent heterosis and 8.47% average over-parent heterosis. 97.78% and 79.44% crosses showed positive mid-parent heterosis and positive over-parent heterosis respectively. Three prediction methods showed different prediction effects for F1 performance. Prediction with additive effect of parents showed the highest prediction accuracy (pearson correlation coefficient, 0.738-0.928) for seven target traits,lint yield, boll numbers, boll weight, lint percentage, fiber length, fiber strength and micronaire value. The additive variance component of target traits and the crossing times for every parent influenced the prediction effect. The higher additive variance component, the higher the prediction accuracy of three methods; with the increase of crossing times of each parent, the prediction accuracy of A and GCA increased, but did not change for MP prediction. 【Conclusion】 The performance of upland cotton F1 can be effectively predicted by using additive effect of parents based on partial NCII design, and ‘large parent population and less crossing times’ is the preferable strategy to maintain reasonable prediction effect and reduce the workload.

Key words: Upland cotton, F1 performance, prediction, partial NCII design

Table 1

Mating patterns in partial NCII mating design"

母本
Female parents		 父本 Male parents
1 2 3 4 5 … 27 28 29 30
31 ×
32 × ×
33 × × ×
34 × × × ×
35 × × × × ×
36 * × × × × …
… * × × × … ×
… * × × … × ×
… * × … × × ×
60 × × × × ×
31 * × × × ×
32 * × × ×
33 * × ×
34 * ×
35 *

Table 2

Performance of heterosis and lint yield performance of parents and crosses"

性状
Traits		 平均值
Mean		 标准误
Standard error		 标准差
Standard variance		 峰度
Skewness		 偏度
Kurtosis		 最小值
Min		 最大值
Max
亲本皮棉产量Lint yield of parents (g/plot, n=60) 475.87 11.50 89.09 1.73 -1.03 168.93 630.95
组合皮棉产量Lint yield of crosses (g/plot, n=180) 567.01 5.26 70.53 -0.38 0.14 387.79 745.10
中亲优势HMP (%) 19.63 0.77 10.29 0.07 0.19 -8.12 45.74
超亲优势HHP (%) 8.47 0.87 11.68 0.26 0.01 -22.70 36.61

Fig. 1

Scatter plot of lint yield of 180 F1 crosses The slope of the dotted line is 1"

Table 3

Prediction accuracy of seven breeding target traits under three prediction methods"

预测方法
Prediction methods		 皮棉产量
Lint yield
[0.25]		 铃数
Boll numbers
[0.20]		 铃重
Boll weight
[0.14]		 衣分
Lint percent
[0.62]		 长度
Fiber length
[0.48]		 强度
Fiber strength
[0.60]		 马克隆
Micronaire
[0.48]
加性效应A 0.839a
(0.036)		 0.756 a
(0.060)		 0.738 a
(0.060)		 0.928 a
(0.017)		 0.905 a
(0.021)		 0.915 a
(0.053)		 0.891 a
(0.026)
一般配合力GCA 0.776b
(0.048)		 0.693 b
(0.120)		 0.706b
(0.067)		 0.870 b
(0.040)		 0.843 b
(0.028)		 0.852c
(0.068)		 0.841 b
(0.048)
中亲值MP 0.777b
(0.048)		 0.669b
(0.064)		 0.585c
(0.082)		 0.880 b
(0.019)		 0.843 b
(0.027)		 0.887 b
(0.021)		 0.823 b
(0.039)

Fig. 2

The prediction accuracy rate of the top 10% crosses by three methods A: Prediction by additive effect; GCA: Prediction by general combining ability; MP: Prediction by mid-parent value. The same as below"

Fig. 3

Prediction accuracy and prediction accuracy rate of the top 10% crosses for lint yield based on three methods and different crossing times a: Prediction accuracy; b: Prediction accuracy rate of the top 10% crosses"

Fig. 4

Prediction accuracy and prediction accuracy rate of the top 10% crosses for fiber length based on three methods and different crossing times a: Prediction accuracy; b: Prediction accuracy rate of the top 10% crosses"

[1] KEMPTHORNE O, CURNOW R N. The partial diallel cross. Biometrics, 1961,17(2):229-250.
[2] CURNOW R N. Sampling the diallel cross. Biometrics, 1963,19:287-306.
[3] FYFE J L, GILBERT N. Partial diallel crosses. Biometrics, 1963,19:278-286.
[4] GORDON G H. A method of parental selection and cross prediction using incomplete partial diallels. Theoretical and Application of Genetics, 1980,56:225-232.
[5] FILHO J B M, VENCOVSKY R. The partial circulant diallel cross at the interpopulation level. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 1999,22(2):249-255.
[6] ZHAO Y S, LI Z, LIU G Z, JIANG Y, MAURER H P, WÜRSCHUMB T, MOCKC H P, MATROS A, EBMEYER E, SCHACHSCHNEIDER R, KAZMANF E, SCHACHT J, GOWDAB M, LONGINB C F H, REIF J C. Genome-based establishment of a high-yielding heterotic pattern for hybrid wheat breeding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2015,112(51):15624-15629.
[7] XU Y, WANG X, DING X W, ZHENG X F, YANG Z F, XU C W, HU Z L. Genomic selection of agronomic traits in hybrid rice using an NCII population. Rice, 2018,11:32.
doi: 10.1186/s12284-018-0223-4 pmid: 29748895
[8] DIAS K O G, PIEPHO H P, GUIMARÃES L J M, GUIMARÃES P E O, PARENTONI S N, PINTO M O, NODA R W, MAGALHÃES J V, GUIMARÃES C T, GARCIA A A F, PASTINA M M. Novel strategies for genomic prediction of untested single-cross maize hybrids using unbalanced historical data. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2020,133:443-455
[9] REIS A J D S, CHAVES L J, DUARTE J B, BRASIL E M. Prediction of hybrid means from a partial circulant diallel table using the ordinary least square and the mixed model methods. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2005,28(2):314-320.
[10] WEN J, ZHAO X W, WU G R, XIANG D, LIU Q, BU S H, YI C, SONG Q J, DUNWELL J M, TU J X, ZHANG T Z, ZHANG Y M. Genetic dissection of heterosis using epistatic association mapping in a partial NCII mating design. Scientific Reports, 2015,5:18376
doi: 10.1038/srep19185 pmid: 26753518
[11] 朱军. 广义遗传模型与数量遗传分析新方法. 浙江农业大学学报, 1994,20(6):551-559.
ZHU J. General genetic models and new analysis methods for quantitative traits. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University, 1994,20(6):551-559. (in Chinese)
[12] 朱军. 作物杂种后代基因型值和杂种优势的预测方法. 生物数学学报, 1993,8(1):32-44.
ZHU J. Methods of predicting genotype value and heterosis for offspring of hybrids. Journal of Biomathematics, 1993,8(1):32-44. (in Chinese)
[13] 朱志翔. 遗传分析软件QGA Station 2.0和GMDR-GPU的开发[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2012.
ZHU Z X. Development of the genetic analysis softwares QGA Station 2.0 and GMDR-GPU[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[14] 秦鸿德, 冯常辉, 张友昌, 陈全求, 张教海, 夏松波, 王孝刚, 王琼珊, 蓝家样, 别墅, 章元明, 焦春海. 一种陆地棉F1产量优势杂交组合的预测方法: 中国, CN 111903499 A. 2020-11-10.
QIN H D, FENG C H, ZHANG Y C, CHEN Q Q, ZHANG J H, XIA S B, WANG X G, WANG Q S, LAN J Y, BIE S, ZHANG Y M, JIAO C H. A prediction method for high yield F1 crosses in Upland Cotton: China, CN 111903499 A. 2020-11-10. (in Chinese)
[15] BERNARDO R. Testcross additive and dominance effects in best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Theoretical and Application of Genetics, 1996,93:1098-1102.
[16] 孙济中, 刘金兰, 张金发. 棉花杂种优势的研究和利用. 棉花学报, 1994,6(3):135-139.
SUN J Z, LIU J L, ZHANG J F. Study and utilization of cotton heterosis. Acta Gossypii Sinica, 1994,6(3):135-139. (in Chinese)
[17] 裴小雨, 周晓箭, 马雄风, 田桂平, 王海风, 孟清芹, 张文生, 周克海, 刘艳改, 杨代刚. 持续高温干旱年份陆地棉农艺和产量性状的遗传效应分析. 棉花学报, 2015,27(2):126-134.
PEI X Y, ZHOU X J, MA X F, TIAN G P, WANG H F, MENG Q Q, ZHANG W S, ZHOU K H, LIU Y G, YANG D G. Genetic analysis of agronomic and yield traits of upland cotton under continuous high temperature and drought. Cotton Science, 2015,27(2):126-134. (in Chinese)
[18] 刘艳改, 马雄风, 周晓箭, 张文英, 王海风, 孟清芹, 张文生, 裴小雨, 周克海, 杨代刚. 陆地棉主要农艺与纤维品质性状的双列杂交分析. 棉花学报, 2014,26(1):25-33.
LIU Y G, MA X F, ZHOU X J, ZHANG W Y, WANG H F, MENG Q Q, ZHANG W S, PEI X Y, ZHOU K H, YANG D G. Report on diallel analysis for main agronomic and fiber quality traits in upland cotton. Cotton Science, 2014,26(1):25-33. (in Chinese)
[19] JENKINS J N, WU J, MCCARTY J C, SAHA S, GUTIÉRREZ O, HAYES R, STELLY D M. Genetic effects of thirteen Gossypium barbadense L. chromosome substitution lines in topcrosses with upland cotton cultivars: I. Yield and yield components. Crop Science, 2006,46(3):1169-1178.
[20] 王学德, 潘家驹. 陆地棉杂种优势及自交衰退的遗传分析. 作物学报, 1991,17(1):18-23.
WANG X D, PAN J J. Genetic analysis of Heterosis and inbreeding depression in Upland Cotton. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1991,17(1):18-23. (in Chinese)
[21] XU S Z, ZHU D, ZHANG Q F. Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2014,111(34):12456-12461.
[22] ALVES F C, GRANATOÍ S C, GALLI G, LYRA D H, NETOM R F, CAMPOS G D L. Bayesian analysis and prediction of hybrid performance. Plant Methods, 2019,15:14.
doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0388-x pmid: 30774704
[1] WANG Feng, CHANG YunNi, WU ZhiDan, SUN Jun, JIANG FuYing, CHEN YuZhen, YU WenQuan. Effects of Long-Term Nitrogen Application on Soil Fungal Diversity, Functional Groups and Assembly Processes in Tea Gardens [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 368-385.
[2] ZHOU Qi, ZHANG ShiHao, ZHANG Liang, PAN Yu, ZHANG LiJuan, TU Zhi, PAN HongMei, LONG Xi. Prediction of the Potential Habitat Suitability of Luopanshan Pigs in Chongqing Based on the Optimized MaxEnt Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 205-219.
[3] WANG AiDong, LI RuiJie, FENG XiangQian, HONG WeiYuan, LI ZiQiu, ZHANG XiaoGuo, WANG DanYing, CHEN Song. Multi-Angle Imaging and Machine Learning Approaches for Accurate Rice Leaf Area Estimation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1719-1734.
[4] YANG GuoChang, ZHENG Yue, BAO XiangNan, DAI YingChun, WANG JinGang, BAI XueFeng, SUN Wei, LI XiHe, ZHANG ShuJun. Research Progress on the Application of Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis Technology in Predicting Methane Emissions from Cows [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1856-1866.
[5] SUN YanYan, NI AiXin, YANG HanHan, YUAN JingWei, CHEN JiLan. Research Progress on Mechanisms Interpretation and Prediction Methods for Heterosis of Livestock [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(5): 1017-1031.
[6] WANG LiYuan, WANG Hui, WANG MuMu, WANG DongJian, LI RuYu, ZHENG YongSheng, ZHANG Han. Construction and Application of DNA Fingerprint Database for Known Varieties in Upland Cotton DUS Testing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(22): 4570-4588.
[7] LEI MingKuo, ZHA Yan, WANG Li, CHENG Gang, WEN CaiYun, YIN ZuoTang, LU Miao. Spatial Prediction of Deep Soil Salinization Based on Layered Modeling Using UAV Imagery [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(20): 4070-4084.
[8] XUAN ZePeng, FENG HuiYao, CHEN MeiQi, XU JiSheng, LIU MengXuan, ZHAO BingZi, ZHANG JiaBao. Effects of Straw Returning Combined with Chemical Fertilizer on Soil Ecosystem Multifunctionality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(14): 2821-2837.
[9] LI KaiLi, WEI YunXiao, CHONG ZhiLi, MENG ZhiGang, WANG Yuan, LIANG ChengZhen, CHEN QuanJia, ZHANG Rui. Red and Blue Light Promotes Cotton Callus Induction and Proliferation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(4): 638-649.
[10] LI HaiPeng, DU WuYan, WU HanQian, ZHANG Jie, MENG HuiSheng, HONG JianPing, XU MingGang, HAO XianJun, GAO WenJun. Different Manures Affect Soil Nutrients and Bacterial Community Structure in Mining Reclamation Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(16): 3207-3219.
[11] LI Kai, BAI GuoSong, TENG ChunRan, MA Teng, ZHONG RuQing, CHEN Liang, ZHANG HongFu. Prediction Equations of Chicken Metabolizable Energy Values for Grain Ingredients Based on in Vitro Simulated Enzymatic Hydrolysate Gross Energy Values and Chemical Composition [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(10): 2035-2045.
[12] CHANG ChunYi, CAO Yuan, GHULAM Mustafa, LIU HongYan, ZHANG Yu, TANG Liang, LIU Bing, ZHU Yan, YAO Xia, CAO WeiXing, LIU LeiLei. Effects of Powdery Mildew on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Quantitative Simulation of Disease Severity in Winter Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(6): 1061-1073.
[13] CAO Ke, CHEN ChangWen, YANG XuanWen, BIE HangLing, WANG LiRong. Genomic Selection for Fruit Weight and Soluble Solid Contents in Peach [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(5): 951-963.
[14] JIA XiaoYun, WANG ShiJie, ZHU JiJie, ZHAO HongXia, LI Miao, WANG GuoYin. Construction of A High-Density Genetic Map and QTL Mapping for Yield Related Traits in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(4): 587-598.
[15] GUO HanYue, WANG DongSheng, RUAN Yang, QIAO YiZhu, ZHANG YunTao, LI Ling, HUANG QiWei, GUO ShiWei, LING Ning, SHEN QiRong. Characteristics and Succession of Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Communities in Continuous Cropping Watermelon [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(21): 4245-4258.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备09089781号-30
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Tel: 86-010-82106279    E-mail: zgnykx@mail.caas.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd