Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 69-79.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.01.008

• PLANT PROTECTION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Influence of Spray Method on the Deposit and Distribution of Spray Droplets in Rice Field

 XU  De-Jin, GU  Zhong-Yan, XU  Guang-Chun, XU  Xiao-Long   

  1. Institute of Plant Protection, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014
  • Received:2013-05-26 Online:2014-01-01 Published:2013-09-16

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to analyze the influence of spray method on the deposit and distribution of pesticide within the rice population, and to put forward reasonable spay technology and improve the utilization ratio of pesticide in rice field. 【Method】The solution of ponceau-G was sprayed by manual sprayer with a hollow cone nozzle upon rice plant and mist sprayer with pneumatic nozzle down 45° tilt angle at rice tillering, booting and flowering stages. The ponceau-G deposited on the microslides, which respectively showed the obverse and reverse of rice leaves and the vertical stem of plant, were collected and measured.【Result】There was a significant difference among the deposition amounts of penceau-G sprayed by different methods at different sites within the field rice population at different growing stages. The deposit rate of ponceau-G was manifested with a distribution trend of upper layer>middle layer>lower layer. At the rice tillering stage, manual sprayer was applied and the deposition of ponceau-G on 13.3% of microslides was close to the average value, the deposition of ponceau-G 52.9% of microslides was lower than the average value, and 33.75% was higher than the average value. At the rice tillering stage, mist sprayer with pneumatic nozzle down 45° tilt angle was applied and the deposit rate of ponceau-G on 20.4% of microslides was close to the average value, 45.4% was lower than the average value, and 34.2% was higher than the average value. At the booting and flowering stages, manual sprayer was applied and 33.3% and 28.1% of microslides did not have any deposition of ponceau-G. When mist sprayer with pneumatic nozzle down 45° tilt angle was applied, there was 13.9% and 5.0% of microslides did not have any ponceau-G deposition. The deposition of only 6.4% and 11.7% of microslides was close to the average value at booting stage for manual sprayer and mist sprayer. At the flowering stage, the proportion was 7.2% and 17.2%, respectively. For manual sprayer, ponceau-G mainly deposited on the microslides expressing obverse of leaves and the amounts were, respectively, 66.3%, 85.1% and 84. 9% of total deposits on microslides in three rice stages, among which the amount of ponceau-G on the microslides from upper layer of plant were, respectively, 38.7%, 42.2% and 45.6% of total deposition. There were litter deposition on the microslides expressing the reverse of rice leaves and the vertical stem of plant, especially on some microslides put in the base of rice plant, the amount of ponceau-G was zero at rice booting and flowering stages. For mist sprayer, the deposition on the microslides showed the reverse of rice leaves and the vertical stem of plant was more than that of manual sprayer. However, the ponceau-G on the microslides showing obverse of leaves were still 50.5%, 50.6% and 53.1% of total deposits, among which the ponceau-G on the microslides from upper layer of plant was, respectively, 32.3%, 27.9% and 31.5% of total deposition.【Conclusion】If the average of total deposition on each microslides was the pesticide dose controlling pest effectively, there were shortage and waste of dose within rice population at the same time. The fog drip of manual sprayer spraying mainly deposited on the obverse of rice leaves of plants’ upper leaves. The deposition rate accounts for above 1/3 of the total deposition amount, while the deposition rate was few on the reverse of leaves and the vertical stem, especially on the plants’ base leaves and vertical stem, on which the deposition rate was nearly zero. When mist sprayer with pneumatic nozzle down 45° tilt angle was applied, the deposition rate of fog drip on the obverse of rice leaves of plants’ upper leaves was more than 1/4 of the total deposition amount. However, when the application volume was less than that of manual sprayer conducting coping spraying, each layer of the reverse of leaves and the vertical stem was demonstrated a significantly higher deposition rate than manual sprayer. It illustrates that spraying with the mist sprayer with pneumatic nozzle down 45° tilt angle, pesticide droplets could be delivered to middle and lower layer and deposited on rice stem and reverse side of leaves.

Key words: rice , spray method , ponceau-G , deposit and distribution

[1]Geiger F, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Weisser W W, Emmerson M, Morales M B, Ceryngier P, Liira J, Tscharntke T, Winqvist C, Eggers S,  Bommarco R, Pärt T, Bretagnolle V, Plantegenest M, Clement L W, Dennis C, Palmer C, Oñate J J, Guerrero I, Hawro V, Aavik T, Thies C, Flohre A, Hänke S, Fischer C, Goedhart P W, Inchausti P. Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2010, 11(2): 97-105.

[2]Ghimire N, Woodward R T. Under- and over-use of pesticides: An international analysis. Ecological Economics, 2013, 89: 73-81.

[3]Cross P, Edwards-Jones G. Variation in pesticide hazard from arable crop production in Great Britain from 1992 to 2008: An extended time-series analysis. Crop Protection, 2011, 30: 1579-1585.

[4]Ebert T A, Downer R A. A different look at experiments on pesticide distribution. Crop Protection, 2006, 25: 299-309.

[5]袁会珠, 何雄奎. 手动喷雾器摆动喷施除草剂药剂分布均匀性探讨. 植物保护, 1998, 24(3): 41-42.

Yuan H Z, He X K. Distribution uniformity of herbicide agent sprayed by manual sprayer. Plant Protection, 1998, 24(3): 41-42. (in Chinese)

[6]Gossen B D, Peng G, Wolf T M, McDonald M R. Improving spray retention to enhance the efficacy of foliar-applied disease- and pest-management products in field and row crops. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 2008, 30(4): 505-516.

[7]Wise J C, Jenkins P E, Schilder A M C, Vandervoort C, Isaacs R. Sprayer type and water volume influence pesticide deposition and control of insect pests and diseases in juice grapes. Crop Protection, 2010, 29: 378-385.

[8]Viret O, Siegfried W, Holliger E, Raisigl U. Comparison of spray deposits and efficacy against powdery mildew of aerial and ground-based spraying equipment in viticulture. Crop Protection, 2003, 22: 1023-1032.

[9]Scudeler F, Raetano C G. Spray deposition and losses in potato as a function of air-assistance and sprayer boom angle. Science Agriculture (Piracicaba, Brazil), 2006, 63(6): 515-521.

[10]Maski D, Durairaj D. Effects of charging voltage, application speed, target height, and orientation upon charged spray deposition on leaf abaxial and adaxial surfaces. Crop Protection, 2010, 29: 134-141.

[11]Foque D, Nuyttens D. Effects of nozzle type and spray angle on spray deposition in ivy pot plants. Pest Management Science, 2011, 67: 199-208.

[12]史岩, 傅泽田, 祁力钧, 李芝银. 垂直小目标雾滴分布试验. 农业机械学报, 2004, 35(4): 47-50.

Shi Y, Fu Z T, Qi L J, Li Z Y. Droplet distribution on tiny vertical targets. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2004, 35(4): 47-50. (in Chinese)

[13]宋坚利, 何雄奎, 杨雪玲. 喷杆式喷雾机雾流方向角对药液沉积影响的试验研究. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(6): 96-99.

Song J L, He X K, Yang X L. Influence of nozzle orientation on spray deposits. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2006, 22(6): 96-99. (in Chinese)

[14]Whitney J D, Salyani M, Churchill D B, Knapp J L, Whiteside J O, Littell R C. A field investigation to examine the effects of sprayer type, ground speed, and volume rate on spray deposition in Florida citrus. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1989, 42(2): 275-283.

[15]唐会联, 刘年喜, 赵玉祥, 刘慈明. 不同药械在稻田喷洒分布量的研究. 湖南农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2000, 26(5): 368-371.

Tang H L, Liu N X, Zhao Y X, Liu C M. An experimental research on spray distribution volume in paddy fields by different insecticide- spreading instruments. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University: Natural Sciences, 2000, 26(5): 368-371. (in Chinese)

[16]宋淑然, 王卫星, 洪添胜, 王平, 罗锡文. 水稻田农药喷雾上层植株雾滴截留影响的试验研究. 农业工程学报, 2003, 19(6): 114-117.

Song S R, Wang W X, Hong T S, Wang P, Luo X W. Testing analysis on deposit and distribution of pesticide spraying in rice field. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Engineering, 2003, 19(6): 114-117. (in Chinese)

[17]邱占奎, 袁会珠, 楼少巍, 纪明山, 于娟娟, 宋晓宇. 水溶性染色剂诱惑红和丽春红-G作为农药沉积分布的示踪剂研究. 农药, 2007, 46(5): 323-326.

Qiu Z K, Yuan H Z, Lou S W, Ji M S, Yu J J, Song X Y. The research of water soluble dyes of allura red and ponceau-G as tracers for determine pesticide spray distribution. Agrochemicals, 2007, 46(5): 323-326. (in Chinese)

[18]Ebert T A, Derksen R. A geometric model of mortality and crop protection for insects feeding on discrete toxicant deposits. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2004, 97(2): 155-162.

[19]Ebert T A, Taylor R A J, Downer R A, Hall F R. Deposit structure and efficacy of pesticide application. 1: Interactions between deposit size, toxicant concentration, and deposit number. Pesticide Science, 1999, 55: 783-792.

[20]Ebert T A, Taylor R A J, Downer R A, Hall F R. Deposit structure and efficacy of pesticide application. 2: Trichoplusia ni control on cannage with fipronil. Pesticide Science, 1999, 55: 793-798

[21]袁雪, 祁力军, 冀荣华, 张建华, 王虎, 黄世凯. 温室风送式弥雾机气流速度场与雾滴沉积特性分析. 农业机械学报, 2012, 43(8): 71-79.

Yuan X, Qi L J, Ji R H, Zhang J H, Wang H, Huang S K. Analysis on features of air-velocity distribution and droplets deposition pattern for greenhouse air-assisted mist sprayer. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery. 2012, 43(8): 71-79. (in Chinese)

[22]顾中言, 徐广春, 徐德进, 许小龙. 稻田农药科学减量的技术体系及其原理. 江苏农业学报, 2012, 28(5): 1016-1024.

Gu Z Y, Xu G C, Xu D J, Xu X L. Technical system for scientific reduction of pesticide use in rice field and tis principle. Jiangsu Journal of Agriculture Science, 2012, 28(5): 1016-1024. (in Chinese)

[23]徐德进, 顾中言, 徐广春, 许小龙. 喷雾器及施液量对水稻冠层农药雾滴沉积特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(20): 4284-4292.

Xu D J, Gu Z Y, Xu G C, Xu X L. Influence of sprayer and application rate on pesticide deposit character on rice canopy. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(20): 4284-4292. (in Chinese)

[24]徐德进, 顾中言, 徐广春, 许小龙, 董玉轩. 雾滴密度及大小对氯虫苯甲酰胺防治稻纵卷叶螟效果的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(4): 666-674.

Xu D J, Gu Z Y, Xu G C, Xu X L, Dong Y X. Effects of droplet density and droplet size on control efficiency of chlorantraniliprole against Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(4): 666-674. (in Chinese)

[25]黄世文, 刘连盟, 王玲, 刘恩勇, 范锃岚, 肖丹凤, 侯恩庆. 药液量及施药方法对不同株型水稻生育后期主要病虫害防效的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(2): 211-217.

Huang S W, Liu L M, Wang L, Liu E Y, Fan Z L, Xiao D F, Hou E Q. Effects of application volume and approaches of pesticide on controlling major pests and diseases on different plant type rice at late growth stage. Chinese Journal Rice Science, 2012, 26(2): 211-217. (in Chinese)

[26]钱允辉, 王志强, 张夕林, 陆自强. 水稻中后期相关农药使用次数与农药残留量动态关系的研究. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(9): 2678-2685.

Qian Y H, Wang Z Q, Zhang X L, Lu Z Q. Studies on the dynamics of pesticide residues and application frequency at the middle-late stage of rice. Scientia Agricultura sinica, 2008, 41(9): 2678-2685. (in Chinese)
[1] PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2# and Changbai7# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2] CUI JieHao, ZHANG Meng, WANG Qin, YU JiaYan, LIN Kun, LI ShangZe, LAN Heng, GENG YanQiu, ZHANG Qiang, GUO LiYing, SHAO XiWen. Evaluation of Lodging Resistance and Its Physiological Mechanisms in Japonica Rice Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1420-1438.
[3] YUAN HaoLiang, NIE Jun, LI Peng, LU YanHong, LIAO YuLin, XU ChangXu, LI ZhongYi, CAO WeiDong, ZHANG JiangLin. Effects of Co-Utilization of Chinese Milk Vetch and Rice Straw on Soil Phosphorus Composition and Phosphorus Activation of Paddy Field in Southern China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1480-1491.
[4] XU YangHaoJun, CHEN LiMing, YANG ShiQi, TANG YiFan, TAN XueMing, ZENG YongJun, PAN XiaoHua, ZENG YanHua. Effects of Long-Term Different Straw Returning Methods on Soil Organic Carbon, Nutrients and Aggregate Formation in Different Soil Layers of Double Cropping Rice Field [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1492-1506.
[5] LI XingYu, HUANG Rong, XIAN YiMing, TIAN JiaoJiao, MA XiaoJin, YANG QiaoXi, LI Bing, WANG ChangQuan. Characteristics of Organic Carbon Fractions and Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Different Size Aggregates in Rice Field Soils in Response to Long-Term Fertilization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1255-1271.
[6] MA ZhaoHui, QUAN ChengZhe, CHENG HaiTao, YANG KanJie, LI XinRui, LÜ WenYan. The Breeding Goals and Strategies of Northeast Japonica Rice Under the Background of Zhongke Fa No.5 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 927-936.
[7] ZHANG WeiJian, YAN ShengJi, SHANG ZiYin, TANG ZhiWei, WU LiuGe, LI JiaRui, CHEN HaoTian, DENG AiXing, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Xin, ZHENG ChengYan, SONG ZhenWei. Methane Emissions from Paddy Fields: Not Entirely Attributable to Rice Cultivation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 824-833.
[8] CHEN Min, JIAO ZiLan, QIAO ChengBin, XU Hao, ZHANG Bi, MA DongHua, KONG WeiRu, WANG JingWen, SONG JiaWei, LUO ChengKe, LI PeiFu, TIAN Lei. Morpho-Physiological Responses and Adaptive Strategies of Rice Germplasm Accessions from Different Subspecies Under Salt Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 705-722.
[9] GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[10] LUO Wei, YU Hong, YUAN LiXin, WANG LingLing, ZHAO JinPeng, YIN Wei, WANG MingTian, WANG RuLin. Change of Geographic Distributions of Ratoon Rice in Sichuan- Chongqing Under Global Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 765-780.
[11] ZHU Shu, GUO ZhiPeng, SUN Ying. Functional Analysis of Rice Target of Rapamycin OsTOR in Regulating Root Elongation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 475-485.
[12] LÜ WenYan, CHENG HaiTao, MA ZhaoHui, TIAN ShuHua. Discussion on Hybridization Breeding Technology and Strategy of Rice in the New Era of Breeding [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 233-238.
[13] LIAO TingLu, SHI YaFei, XIAO DongHao, SHE YangMengFei, GUO FuCheng, YANG JiuJu, TANG HaiJiang, LUO ChengKe. The Effect of Exogenous Nitroprusside on Sugar Metabolism in Rice Seedlings Under Alkaline Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 265-277.
[14] LIU TianSheng, LIU GengYuan, ZHAO AnQi, YANG Xu, CAI MingXue, YANG AiWen, LOU MingXuan, LI MuKai, WANG Han, ZHANG YaLing. Pathogenic Population of Rice Bakanae Disease in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 305-321.
[15] WANG ZhongNi, LEI Yue, LI JiaLi, GONG YanLong, ZHU SuSong. Functions of ABC Transporter OsARG1 in Rice Heading Date Regulation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 1-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!