Scientia Agricultura Sinica

Previous Articles    

Trends of American Soft Wheat Grain Quality and Analysis of Chinese Weak Gluten Wheat Standard Reaching Rate

LIU Feng, JIANG JiaLi, ZHOU Qin, CAI Jian, WANG Xiao, HUANG Mei, ZHONG YingXin, DAI TingBo, JIANG Dong   

  1. Nanjing Agriculture University/Wheat Production Technology Innovation Centre, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210095
  • Published:2022-01-29

Abstract: ObjectiveThe consumption of biscuits in China is increasing yearly, but soft wheat, the material for making biscuits, has been in shortage for a long time. American soft wheat is of stable quality and excellent processing performance, and is welcomed by Chinese processing enterprises. Study on the interannual dynamic change of grain quality and the relationship between quality indexes of American soft red winter and soft white wheat in multiple years can provide reference for Chinese weak gluten wheat production.MethodBased on the quality data of soft wheat published by American Wheat Association from 1999 to 2019, the correlation analysis and cluster analysis were used to analyzed the relationship among wheat grain, flour, dough and baking quality. The fitness of American soft wheat quality to the existing weak gluten wheat standard in China was also analyzed.ResultFor grain quality, mean value of grain protein content (GPC, %), hardness (H), test weight, (TW, g·L-1) and 1000-grain weight (TKW, g) of soft red winter wheat were lower than soft white wheat. The annual variation of quality indexes showed: H > TKW > GPC > TW. For flour quality, the wet gluten content (WG, %) of two kinds of soft wheat were about 22%. Four kinds of solvent retention capacity (SRC, %) of soft red winter wheat were higher than or similar to soft white wheat, and the WG, sedimentation value and four kinds SRC of soft red winter wheat had lower variation coefficients. For dough quality, the development time, stability time (ST, min), alveograph P, L, W value and extensograph parameters of soft red winter wheat were lower than those of soft white wheat, and their water absorption (WA, %) was about 52%. The variation coefficients of farinograph, alveograph and extensograph parameters of soft red winter wheat were lower. According to Chinese weak gluten wheat standard GB 17320-2013, the reaching rate of GPC, WG and ST in soft red winter wheat were 100%,, 100% and 57.1%. The reaching rates of GPC, WG and ST in soft white wheat were 90.5%, 95.2% and 38.1%, respectively. Under GB 17893-1999, GPC, WG and ST of two kinds of soft wheat were as follows: GPC< WG < ST, and the reaching rate was less than 70%. Correlation analysis of soft white wheat showed that there was a significant negative correlation between TKW and GPC, WG, sucrose SRC,H and WG, and a significant positive correlation between GPC and WG, sucrose, lactic acid SRC, sucrose SRC and alveograph W, lactic acid SRC and extensibility. Biscuits diameter was negatively correlated with GPC, W and sucrose SRC, and positively correlated with TW, Biscuits spread ratio was negatively correlated with sucrose SRC. Correlation analysis of soft red winter wheat showed that the protein content of flour was positively correlated with WG and ST, and biscuits diameter was negatively correlated with TW and W.ConclusionSoft red winter wheat has softer grain texture, smaller grain weight and weaker dough strength. The TW, flour extraction rate(FER, %) and WA are stable in different years. Soft red winter wheat fit the requirements of Chinese weak gluten wheat standard better, with higher reaching rate. The Chinese weak gluten wheat standard is too strict on GPC, WG and ST. The correlation among quality indexes of soft white wheat was more significant than soft red winter wheat. The GPC, sucrose SRC and alveograph W are significantly correlated with other quality indexes, which can be used to evaluate the quality of weak gluten wheat. The GPC, WG, sedimentation value and alveograph L of soft wheat are similar, which can be classified into same category.


Key words: soft white wheat, soft red winter wheat, quality characteristics, correlation analysis

[1] NAN Rui, YANG YuCun, SHI FangHui, ZHANG LiNing, MI TongXi, ZHANG LiQiang, LI ChunYan, SUN FengLi, XI YaJun, ZHANG Chao. Identification of Excellent Wheat Germplasms and Classification of Source-Sink Types [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(6): 1019-1034.
[2] FU Shan, LIANG Ye, XU JiuLiang, RUAN YunZe, LUO Jian, LI TingYu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit Texture and Taste Quality of Pineapple Based on Multiple Methods [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(15): 3006-3019.
[3] XIANG YuTing, WANG XiaoLong, HU XinZhong, REN ChangZhong, GUO LaiChun, LI Lu. Lipase Activity Difference of Oat Varieties and Prediction of Low Lipase Activity Variety with High Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4104-4117.
[4] LIU Feng,JIANG JiaLi,ZHOU Qin,CAI Jian,WANG Xiao,HUANG Mei,ZHONG YingXin,DAI TingBo,CAO WeiXing,JIANG Dong. Analysis of American Soft Wheat Grain Quality and Its Suitability Evaluation According to Chinese Weak Gluten Wheat Standard [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3723-3737.
[5] FENG JunJie,ZHAO WenDa,ZHANG XinQuan,LIU YingJie,YUAN Shuai,DONG ZhiXiao,XIONG Yi,XIONG YanLi,LING Yao,MA Xiao. DUS Traits Variation Analysis and Application of Standard Varieties of Lolium multiflorum Introduced from Japan [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2447-2460.
[6] Ting ZHANG,GenPing WANG,YanJie LUO,Lin LI,Xiang GAO,RuHong CHENG,ZhiGang SHI,Li DONG,XiRui ZHANG,WeiHong YANG,LiShan XU. Color Difference Analysis in the Application of High Quality Foxtail Millet Breeding [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(5): 901-908.
[7] LI KaiFeng,YIN YuHe,WANG Qiong,LIN TuanRong,GUO HuaChun. Correlation Analysis of Volatile Flavor Components and Metabolites Among Potato Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 792-803.
[8] YAN YongLiang,SHI XiaoLei,ZHANG JinBo,GENG HongWei,XIAO Jing,LU ZiFeng,NI ZhongFu,CONG Hua. Genome-Wide Association Study of Grain Quality Related Characteristics of Spring Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(19): 4033-4047.
[9] ZHANG BinBin,CAI ZhiXiang,SHEN ZhiJun,YAN Juan,MA RuiJuan,YU MingLiang. Diversity Analysis of Phenotypic Characters in Germplasm Resources of Ornamental Peaches [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2406-2418.
[10] XIANG JiShan,LIU PengPeng,SANG Wei,CUI FengJuan,HAN XinNian,NIE YingBin,KONG DeZhen,ZOU Bo,XU HongJun,MU PeiYuan. Allelic Variations of Pins Genes in Xinjiang Spring Wheat Varieties and Their Influence on Processing Quality of Xinjiang Hand-Stretched Noodles [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(19): 3857-3866.
[11] LIU SiChen,CAO XiaoNing,WEN QiFen,WANG HaiGang,TIAN Xiang,WANG JunJie,CHEN Ling,QIN HuiBin,WANG Lun,QIAO ZhiJun. Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Traits and Quality Traits of Foxtail Millet Landrace in Shanxi [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(11): 2137-2148.
[12] ZHU ZiJian,CHEN SiYu,SU Jun,TAO YongSheng. Correlation Analysis Between Amino Acids and Fruity Esters During Spine Grape Fermentation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(11): 2272-2284.
[13] FANG HuiTing,MENG JiHua,CHENG ZhiQiang. Spatio-Temporal Variability of Soil Available Nutrients Based on Remote Sensing and Crop Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(3): 478-490.
[14] YANG QingHua, QIU Jun, LI Hai, YANG TianYu, CHENG BingWen, ZHAO Min, LIU GuoQing, GAO XiaoLi, FENG BaiLi. Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic, Yield and Quality Traits of Broomcorn Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(23): 4530-4544.
[15] WANG Yang, WANG WenHui, JIA XiaoHui, TONG Wei, WANG ZhiHua, YANG XiaoLong. Evaluation of Frozen Fruit Quality of Different Pear Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(17): 3400-3412.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!