Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (18): 4033-4047.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.18.007

• SPECIAL FOCUS: MECHANISM ANALYSIS, TECHNOLOGY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION-MAKING SUPPORT FOR PRECISION PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF AGRICULTURAL PESTS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Monitoring of Resistance to Omethoate in Field Populations of Aphis gossypii in China and Elucidation of Target Resistance Mechanisms

LI Ren1,2(), CHENG ShenHang2,3, LIANG PingZhuo2, ZHANG Lei2(), WANG ShanNing1()   

  1. 1 Institute of Plant Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097
    2 College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193
    3 School of Synthetic Biology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006
  • Received:2026-04-01 Accepted:2026-05-02 Online:2026-09-16 Published:2026-09-20
  • Contact: ZHANG Lei, WANG ShanNing

Abstract:

【Objective】The objective of this study is to determine the resistance level of Aphis gossypii populations from the main cotton planting areas of China to omethoate, to elucidate the predominant mutant types in acetylcholinesterase 1 (AChE1) (the target of omethoate) in these populations, and further analyze the impacts on the AChE1 structure by these major mutation types and their relationship with omethoate resistance.【Method】In 2019-2023, A. gossypii field populations were collected from the main cotton planting areas of China, and the resistance levels of these populations to omethoate were determined using the leaf-dipping method. Mutations in AChE1 were detected by single-aphid PCR amplification and sequencing, and the types of mutations carried by an individual aphid were analyzed. Monoclonal strains carrying different AChE1 mutations were established using single-female rearing protocols, and their contributions to omethoate resistance were subsequently assessed through toxicity bioassays and synergist experiments. The mechanisms of A. gossypii resistance to omethoate mediated by these mutations were revealed using homology modeling, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations.【Result】In 2019-2023, 38 A. gossypii field populations in China developed moderate to high levels of resistance to omethoate (17.1-207.8-fold) and remained relatively stable over the years. G221A, A302S, A332V, and S431F mutations in AChE1 were prevalent in these populations, with S431F mutation frequency reaching 100%, predominantly in homozygous form. While the average frequencies of G221A, A302S, and A332V were 37.26%, 51.26%, and 74.64%, respectively. Detection of mutant types from a single aphid revealed that individuals carrying the A332V+S431F combination mutation had the highest frequency (35.24%), followed by G221A+A302S+A332V+S431F (26.80%) and A302S+A332V+S431F (12.12%). The average frequency of the S431F single mutation was 9.56%. The weighted frequencies of these major mutation types showed a certain linear correlation with omethoate resistance (R2=0.46, P<0.001). By constructing monoclonal mutant strains, it was confirmed that A. gossypii strains carrying the combination mutations A332V+S431F, G221A+A302S+S431F, A302S+A332V+S431F, and G221A+A302S+A332V+S431F developed a moderate level of resistance to omethoate, with resistance ratios of 46.1-77.8-fold, significantly higher than that of the S431F single-mutant strain (12.5-fold). Moreover, PBO, TPP, and DEM did not exhibit significant synergistic effects on omethoate toxicity in these mutant strains. Molecular docking and dynamics simulations confirmed that the S431F single mutation and A332V+S431F, G221A+A302S+S431F, A302S+A332V+S431F, and G221A+A302S+A332V+S431F combination mutations significantly increased the geometric center distance between the AChE1 catalytic triad and omethoate by 0.074-0.185 nm compared to the wild-type. These mutations also altered the hydrophobic area and radius of gyration of the AChE1 active center, thereby affecting the active center of A. gossypii AChE1 and its binding conformation with omethoate.【Conclusion】A. gossypii populations in major cotton-planting regions of China have developed moderate to high levels of resistance to omethoate. Four mutations were identified in AChE1 across these populations, and these site mutations altered the active center of AChE1 and its binding affinity for omethoate through different combination types, thereby mediating field resistance to this insecticide. In field control practices, it is advisable to reduce the use of AChE-targeting insecticides to prevent the development of cross-resistance mediated by target mutation and further escalation of resistance levels.

Key words: Aphis gossypii, omethoate, acetylcholinesterase, resistance, mutation

Table 1

The collecting sites of A. gossypii field populations in 2019-2023"

年份
Year
种群
Population
位置
Location
经纬度
Longitude,
latitude (E, N)
年份
Year
种群
Population
位置
Location
经纬度
Longitude,
latitude (E, N)
2019 HeBCZ 河北沧州Cangzhou, Hebei 116.87°, 38.31° 2021 HNNY 河南南阳Nanyang, Henan 112.54°, 33.00°
HeBHS 河北衡水Hengshui, Hebei 115.58°, 37.55° SDBZ 山东滨州Binzhou, Shandong 118.02°, 37.43°
SDDY 山东东营Dongying, Shandong 118.58°, 37.45° SXYC 山西运城Yuncheng, Shanxi 111.00°, 35.02°
SDHZ 山东菏泽Heze, Shandong 115.57°, 35.07° XJCJ 新疆昌吉Changji, Xinjiang 87.31°, 44.01°
SDJN 山东济宁Jining, Shandong 116.60°, 35.41° XJKC 新疆库车Kuche, Xinjiang 86.17°, 42.03°
XJKEL 新疆库尔勒Kuerle, Xinjiang 86.17°, 41.73° XJKT 新疆奎屯Kuitun, Xinjiang 84.90°, 44.43°
XJSHZ 新疆石河子Shihezi, Xinjiang 86.08°, 44.31° XJTMSK 新疆图木舒克Tumushuke, Xinjiang 79.21°, 40.00°
XJNWS 新疆农五师Nongwushi, Xinjiang 82.41°, 44.21° XJTLF 新疆吐鲁番Tulufan, Xinjiang 89.19°, 42.94°
2020 SDDY 山东东营Dongying, Shandong 118.58°, 37.45° XJYL 新疆伊犁Yili, Xinjiang 81.32°, 43.92°
HeBHS 河北衡水Hengshui, Hebei 115.58°, 37.55° 2022 HuBJZ 湖北荆州Jingzhou, Hubei 112.02°, 30.05°
SDXJ 山东夏津Xiajin, Shandong 116.00°, 36.95° SDDY 山东东营Dongying, Shandong 118.41°, 37.05°
SXYC 山西运城Yuncheng, Shanxi 111.00°, 35.02° XJWJQ 新疆五家渠Wujiaqu, Xinjiang 87.54°, 44.17°
XJBL 新疆博乐Bole, Xinjiang 82.05°, 44.85° XJSW 新疆沙湾Shawan, Xinjiang 85.62°, 44.33°
XJKEL 新疆库尔勒Kuerle, Xinjiang 86.17°, 41.73° 2023 SDTZ 山东滕州Tengzhou, Shandong 116.00°, 36.95°
XJSHZ 新疆石河子Shihezi, Xinjiang 86.08°, 44.31° SDDY 山东东营Dongying, Shandong 118.41°, 37.05°
XJWS 新疆乌苏Wusu, Xinjiang 84.68°, 44.44° HuBJZ 湖北荆州Jingzhou, Hubei 112.19°, 30.35°
XJYL 新疆伊犁Yili, Xinjiang 81.32°, 43.92° XJHYH 新疆胡杨河Huyanghe, Xinjiang 84.83°, 44.69°
2021 HeBHS 河北衡水Hengshui, Hebei 115.58°, 37.55° XJKS 新疆喀什Kashi, Xinjiang 75.99°, 39.47°
HNKF 河南开封Kaifeng, Henan 114.35°, 34.79° XJHT 新疆和田Hetian, Xinjiang 79.92°, 37.11°

Table 2

The resistance of A. gossypii field populations to omethoate in 2019-2023"

年份
Year
种群
Population
试虫数
Number of test insects
斜率±标准误Slope±SE 致死中浓度(95%置信限)
LC50 (95% CL) (mg·L-1)
抗性倍数Resistance ratio 卡方值(自由度)
χ2 (df)
2019 HeBCZ 434 2.39±0.23 247.79 (204.60-300.85) 41.2 12.47 (12)
HeBHS 403 1.38±0.20 1022.21 (758.50-1567.85) 169.8 12.17 (13)
SDDY 464 1.25±0.14 282.29 (210.85-359.73) 46.9 8.61 (14)
SDHZ 457 1.47±0.14 400.68 (328.38-495.35) 66.6 11.25 (13)
SDJN 463 1.41±0.15 372.81 (289.67-463.10) 61.9 12.48 (15)
XJKEL 449 1.64±0.15 468.96 (380.87-570.35) 77.9 9.38 (14)
XJNWS 525 1.49±0.17 102.90 (69.97-139.53) 17.1 8.29 (16)
XJSHZ 445 2.08±0.20 383.24 (310.00-460.45) 63.7 10.71 (13)
2020 HeBHS 522 1.13±0.13 590.32 (453.63-807.69) 98.1 4.43 (11)
SDDY 451 3.52±0.49 729.43 (573.32-864.53) 121.2 14.60 (12)
SDXJ 484 2.29±0.48 508.70 (331.93-666.55) 84.5 14.61 (13)
SXYC 544 1.63±0.18 1217.41 (944.02-1648.82) 202.2 16.35 (13)
XJBL 536 1.19±0.14 636.75 (482.49-917.19) 105.8 4.77 (13)
XJKEL 469 1.79±0.17 387.28 (308.77-475.30) 64.3 11.73 (13)
XJSHZ 444 1.46±0.19 624.73 (444.95-980.10) 103.8 13.35 (10)
XJWS 507 2.48±0.22 1251.02 (1015.26-1517.09) 207.8 18.63 (13)
XJYL 505 2.30±0.18 389.62 (327.96-467.65) 64.7 13.58 (13)
2021 SDBZ 626 1.71±0.16 592.34 (476.68-720.05) 98.4 14.48 (16)
XJCJ 597 1.75±0.17 343.13 (233.55-462.08) 57.0 18.72 (14)
HeBHS 568 1.31±0.11 746.39 (577.30-980.07) 124.0 17.24 (16)
HNKF 616 2.17±0.21 165.80 (117.15-217.33) 27.5 17.05 (14)
XJKC 677 2.33±0.22 438.88 (349.80-527.30) 72.9 16.54 (16)
XJKT 632 2.11±0.24 365.47 (263.43-465.18) 60.7 16.06 (15)
HNNY 577 2.17±0.21 196.79 (127.87-274.43) 32.7 15.97 (10)
XJTLF 610 1.70±0.14 674.63 (552.27-819.63) 112.1 12.80 (13)
XJTMSK 597 1.92±0.18 1200.53 (1016.26-1434.19) 199.4 9.71 (14)
XJYL 579 2.11±0.28 735.29 (512.96-955.97) 122.1 16.62 (13)
SXYC 622 1.60±0.15 380.01 (274.01-504.93) 63.1 15.54 (13)
2022 SDDY 675 1.81±0.21 541.21 (409.16-669.77) 89.9 12.47 (16)
HuBJZ 670 1.78±0.26 308.75 (147.39-465.93) 51.3 20.78 (12)
XJSW 670 1.93±0.22 824.45 (605.06-1066.98) 137.0 19.38 (14)
XJWJQ 582 1.82±0.23 1234.02 (940.00-1656.41) 205.0 19.01 (14)
2023 SDDY 492 2.39±0.34 372.95 (262.56-478.86) 62.0 12.67(12)
XJHYH 470 2.41±0.43 645.37 (458.83-848.08) 107.2 18.56 (13)
SDTZ 458 1.22±0.24 404.84 (238.08-602.15) 67.2 5.01 (13)
HuBJZ 407 1.60±0.22 141.41 (72.98-218.58) 23.5 18.48 (13)
XJKS 534 4.22±0.84 805.12 (630.18-942.79) 133.7 14.73 (10)
XJHT 525 1.25±0.33 738.51 (452.45-1133.60) 122.7 8.40 (12)

Fig. 1

The sequencing chromatograms of G221A (A), A302S (B), A332V (C), and S431F (D) mutations in AChE1 of A. gossypii field populations SS, RS, and RR represent susceptible homozygous, resistant heterozygous, and resistant homozygous mutations, respectively. The same as Fig. 2"

Fig. 2

The mutation frequencies of G221A, A302S, A332V, and S431F in AChE1 of A. gossypii field populations"

Fig. 3

Analysis of mutation types carried by a single A. gossypii AChE1 and their correlation with omethoate resistance"

Table 3

Synergism effects of PBO, TPP, and DEM on the toxicity of omethoate in A. gossypii mutant strains"

品系
Strain
药剂+增效剂
Insecticide+
synergist
试虫数
Number
of test insects
斜率±标准误
Slope±SE
致死中浓度(95%置信限)
LC50 (95% CL) (mg·L-1)
P
P value
抗性倍数
Resistance
ratio
增效倍数
Synergism ratio
S431F (RR) OME 534 3.70±0.38 75.0 (64.3-87.3) 0.889 12.5
OME+TPP 539 2.18±0.19 81.0 (64.7-98.8) 0.897 13.5 0.93
OME+DEM 533 2.23±0.21 86.5 (67.3-107.0) 0.909 14.4 0.87
OME+PBO 523 2.05±0.19 78.5 (60.5-98.1) 0.843 13.0 0.96
A332V (RR)+S431F (RR) OME 500 2.24±0.33 277.3 (195.3-352.8) 0.871 46.1
OME+TPP 524 3.34±0.56 346.0 (234.4-427.2) 0.141 57.5 0.80
OME+DEM 505 5.35±0.76 408.3 (338.8-471.1) 0.175 67.8 0.68
OME+PBO 509 4.55±0.76 363.0 (297.2-414.7) 0.843 60.3 0.76
G221A (RS)+A302S (RR)
+S431F (RR)
OME 500 4.59±0.72 410.8 (281.9-510.0) 0.124 68.2
OME+TPP 561 2.93±0.39 379.3 (289.4-459.2) 0.230 63.0 1.08
OME+DEM 515 2.71±0.35 468.4 (387.2-549.3) 0.529 77.8 0.88
OME+PBO 520 2.58±0.57 405.6 (263.2-501.7) 0.773 67.4 1.01
A302S (RS)+A332V (RS)
+S431F (RR)
OME 525 2.25±0.35 410.8 (311.8-499.8) 0.605 68.2
OME+TPP 521 1.72±0.25 301.0 (208.5-391.3) 0.674 50.0 1.36
OME+DEM 507 1.79±0.26 293.8 (192.2-390.1) 0.285 48.8 1.40
OME+PBO 517 1.59±0.18 280.6 (192.3-381.9) 0.164 46.6 1.46
G221A (RS)+A302S (RS) +A332V (RS)+S431F (RR) OME 536 2.39±0.55 468.6 (196.1-641.6) 0.074 77.8
OME+TPP 525 2.16±0.23 264.4 (190.5-341.4) 0.195 43.9 1.77
OME+DEM 522 2.63±0.33 393.3 (319.8-463.2) 0.915 65.3 1.19
OME+PBO 528 2.08±0.33 287.6 (183.5-375.5) 0.388 47.8 1.63

Fig. 4

The structure of A. gossypii AChE1"

Fig. 5

Stability analysis of molecular dynamics simulations of wild-type (WT) and mutant structures of A. gossypii AChE1 with omethoate complexes"

Fig. 6

The impacts of mutations in A. gossypii AChE1 on the binding pockets of omethoate"

Fig. 7

The interactions of A. gossypii AChE1 WT and mutant structures with omethoate"

Table 4

The binding energy of A. gossypii AChE1 WT and mutant structures with omethoate (kJ·mol-1)"

突变类型
Mutation type
吉布斯自由能
Gibbs free energy
范德华能
Van der Waals energy
静电能
Electrostatic energy
溶剂化能极性部分
Polar solvation
energy
溶剂化能非极性部分
Non-polar solvation energy

Entropy
WT -21.8±15.5 -126.4±10.8 -57.1±14.1 151.0±12.8 -15.9±0.5 -26.6
S431F -15.9±16.3 -140.5±11.9 -74.0±11.9 183.7±17.3 -16.0±0.3 -30.8
A302S+A332V+S431F -6.8±15.1 -137.7±10.6 -54.5±11.6 167.9±15.7 -16.2±0.4 -33.9
A332V+S431F -7.5±18.3 -131.7±9.1 -47.6±8.8 166.0±18.5 -16.2±0.3 -22.1
G221A+A302S+S431F -23.6±17.2 -129.7±11.3 -49.8±14.3 146.2±22.6 -16.2±0.5 -25.9
G221A+A302S+A332V+S431F -20.8±15.0 -137.3±11.0 -61.1±19.3 146.2±15.7 -16.3±0.6 -47.6
[1]
Pan J, Farhan M, Liu X, Li H, Yin Z, Zhang S. Adaptive divergence of three Aphis gossypii haplotypes on leguminous hosts[J]. Pest Management Science, 2026, 82(1): 169-182.

doi: 10.1002/ps.v82.1
[2]
唐睿, 孙宪银, 卓富彦, 朱景全, 郭荣. 近5年中国棉花主要病虫害发生演替及防控分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(12): 2208-2219.

doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.12.007
Tang R, Sun X Y, Zhuo F Y, Zhu J Q, Guo R. Investigation and research on the dynamic occurrence of major crop diseases and pests and the succession of control strategy in China during five years[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(12): 2208-2219. (in Chinese)
[3]
Shi D D, Wang T T, Lv H X, Li X C, Wan H, He S, You H, Li J H, Ma K S. Insecticide resistance monitoring and diagnostics of resistance mechanisms in cotton-melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover in central China[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2023, 147(6): 392-405.

doi: 10.1111/jen.v147.6
[4]
元洁琼. 我国棉蚜杀虫药剂的敏感度及CarE和AChE活性变异[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2013.
Yuan J Q. The variations of insecticide sensitivity and activity of CarE and AChE in Aphis gossypii Glover[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[5]
安静杰, 高占林, 党志红, 赵玉敬, 窦亚楠, 闫秀, 华佳楠, 潘文亮, 郭江龙, 李耀发. 河北省不同地区棉蚜种群对6种杀虫剂的抗性动态[J]. 农药学学报, 2021, 23(6): 1123-1131.
An J J, Gao Z L, Dang Z H, Zhao Y J, Dou Y N, Yan X, Hua J N, Pan W L, Guo J L, Li Y F. Resistance dynamic of different Aphis gossypii populations in Hebei Province to six insecticides[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2021, 23(6): 1123-1131. (in Chinese)
[6]
Nam H Y, Kim S, Lee S H, Lee J H, Kim J. Insecticide resistance in pepper greenhouse populations of Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Korea[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2022, 182: 105033.

doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.105033
[7]
Gong Y H, Ai G M, Li M, Shi X Y, Diao Q Y, Gao X W. Functional characterization of carboxylesterase gene mutations involved in Aphis gossypii resistance to organophosphate insecticides[J]. Insect Molecular Biology, 2017, 26(6): 702-714.

doi: 10.1111/imb.12331 pmid: 28799241
[8]
Li F, Venthur H, Wang S, Homem R A, Zhou J J. Evidence for the involvement of the chemosensory protein AgosCSP5 in resistance to insecticides in the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii[J]. Insects, 2021, 12(4): 335.

doi: 10.3390/insects12040335
[9]
Bass C, Nauen R. The molecular mechanisms of insecticide resistance in aphid crop pests[J]. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2023, 156: 103937.

doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2023.103937
[10]
Yan D, Ghaderi R, He J, Cao A, Wang Q. Recent advances in nematicides and their modes of action[J]. Agriculture, 2026, 16(1): 21.

doi: 10.3390/agriculture16010021
[11]
Li F, Han Z. Mutations in acetylcholinesterase associated with insecticide resistance in the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover[J]. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2004, 34(4): 397-405.

doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.02.001
[12]
Kim Y H, Lee S H. Which acetylcholinesterase functions as the main catalytic enzyme in the Class Insecta?[J]. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2013, 43(1): 47-53.

doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.11.004 pmid: 23168079
[13]
Haddi K, Berger M, Bielza P, Rapisarda C, Williamson M S, Moores G, Bass C. Mutation in the ace-1 gene of the tomato leaf miner (Tuta absoluta) associated with organophosphates resistance[J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2017, 141(8): 612-619.

doi: 10.1111/jen.2017.141.issue-8
[14]
Yang X, Mou R, Liang Q, Cheng J, Wu Y, Tan W, Wu J. Frequency and polymorphism of acetylcholinesterase gene involved in the organophosphate resistance of Musca domestica in Guizhou Province, China[J]. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 2023, 114(3): e22045.

doi: 10.1002/arch.v114.3
[15]
Li B L, Chen W, Liu L, Zhang X C, Bao Y Y, Cheng J A, Zhu Z R, Zhang C X. Molecular characterization of two acetylcholinesterase genes from the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae)[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2012, 102(3): 198-203.

doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.01.004
[16]
Guo D, Luo J, Zhou Y, Xiao H, He K, Yin C, Xu J, Li F. ACE: An efficient and sensitive tool to detect insecticide resistance-associated mutations in insect acetylcholinesterase from RNA-Seq data[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2017, 18(1): 330.

doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1741-6 pmid: 28693417
[17]
Andrews M C, Callaghan A, Field L M, Williamson M S, Moores G D. Identification of mutations conferring insecticide-insensitive AChE in the cotton-melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover[J]. Insect Molecular Biology, 2004, 13(5): 555-561.

pmid: 15373812
[18]
Lokeshwari D, Kumar N K, Manjunatha H. Multiple mutations on the second acetylcholinesterase gene associated with dimethoate resistance in the melon aphid, Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae)[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2016, 109(2): 887-897.

pmid: 26797869
[19]
Xu X, Ding Q, Wang X, Wang R J, Ullah F, Gao X W, Song D L. V101I and R81T mutations in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor β1 subunit are associated with neonicotinoid resistance in Myzus persicae[J]. Pest Management Science, 2022, 78(4): 1500-1507.

doi: 10.1002/ps.v78.4
[20]
Moores G D, Gao X W, Denholm I, Devonshire A L. Characterisation of insensitive acetylcholinesterase in insecticide-resistant cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae)[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 1996, 56(2): 102-110.

doi: 10.1006/pest.1996.0064
[21]
Ma K S, Tang Q L, Zhang B Z, Liang P, Wang B M, Gao X W. Overexpression of multiple cytochrome P450 genes associated with sulfoxaflor resistance in Aphis gossypii Glover[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2019, 157: 204-210.

doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.03.021
[22]
Zolfaghari M, Xiao Y, Azam F M, Yin F, Peng Z K, Li Z Y. Resistance mechanism of Plutella xylostella (L.) associated with amino acid substitutions in acetylcholinesterase-1: Insights from homology modeling, docking and molecular dynamic simulation[J]. Insects, 2024, 15(3): 144.

doi: 10.3390/insects15030144
[23]
Méndez-Álvarez D, Herrera-Mayorga V, Juárez-Saldivar A, Paz- González A D, Ortiz-Pérez E, Bandyopadhyay D, Pérez-Sánchez H, Rivera G. Ligand-based virtual screening, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics of eugenol analogs as potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitors with biological activity against Spodoptera frugiperda[J]. Molecular Diversity, 2022, 26(4): 2025-2037.

doi: 10.1007/s11030-021-10312-5
[24]
Liu H, Yan X, Fang H, Ge H, Hou X. WeMol: A cloud-based and zero-code platform for AI-driven molecular design and simulation[J]. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2026, 66(4): 2369-2381.

doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6c00014
[25]
吴孔明, 刘芹轩. 棉蚜对杀虫剂抗性的稳定性[J]. 昆虫学报, 1995, 38(2): 253-255.
Wu K M, Liu Q X. Stability of resistance to several insecticides in cotton aphid[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 1995, 38(2): 253-255. (in Chinese)
[26]
慕立义, 王开运, 姜翠玲, 沈慧敏, 姜家良, 陈巧云, 邓启荣, 林国芳. 棉蚜 (Aphis gossypii Glover) 对氰戊菊酯、氧乐果及其混剂抗药性的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 1988, 21(6): 18-26.
Mu L Y, Wang K Y, Jiang C L, Shen H M, Jiang J L, Chen Q Y, Deng Q R, Lin G F. Studies of resistance to fenvalerate, omethoate and mixture agent by Aphis gossypii[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1988, 21(6): 18-26. (in Chinese)
[27]
Casida J E. Neonicotinoids and other insect nicotinic receptor competitive modulators: Progress and prospects[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2018, 63: 125-144.

doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043042 pmid: 29324040
[28]
肖佳玲. 棉蚜乙酰胆碱酯酶点突变检测及RNAi验证[D]. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015.
Xiao J L. Detection of point mutations and RNAi verification of acetylcholinesterase in Aphis gossypii (Glover)[D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[29]
帕提玛·乌木尔汗. 新疆棉蚜抗药性及杀虫剂和棉蚜胁迫对棉叶生理生化效应[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2019.
Patima W M E H. Resistance of Aphis gossypii (Glover) in Xinjiang and physiological and biochemical effects on cotton leaves caused by insecticide and Aphis gossypii stress[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[30]
王帅宇, 张子腾, 谢爱婷, 董杰, 杨建国, 张爱环. 我国草地贪夜蛾种群杀虫剂靶标基因突变分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(20): 3948-3959. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.20.007.
Wang S Y, Zhang Z T, Xie A T, Dong J, Yang J G, Zhang A H. Mutation analysis of insecticide target genes in populations of Spodoptera frugiperda in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 3948-3959. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.20.007. (in Chinese)
[31]
Guan F, Xiao X, Dong R R, Wang C Y, Jin Z, Wu S W, Wu Y D, Yang Y H. Detection and functional validation of point mutations in acetylcholinesterase-1 associated with organophosphate resistance in field populations of Helicoverpa armigera[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2025, 118(1): 359-368.

doi: 10.1093/jee/toae268
[32]
Fan Y J, Dong X Y, Yang D, Qin Y, Hu X P, Zhou H X. New mutations of acetylcholinesterase in Bactrocera dorsalis populations across southern China and impact on resistance to organophosphate[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2025, 297: 118189.

doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.118189
[33]
Yeh S C, Lin C L, Chang C, Feng H T, Dai S M. Amino acid substitutions and intron polymorphism of acetylcholinesterase1 associated with mevinphos resistance in diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.)[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2014, 112: 7-12.

doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.04.009
[34]
Shang Q L, Pan Y O, Fang K, Xi J H, Wong A, Brennan J A, Cao C W. Extensive Ace2 duplication and multiple mutations on Ace1 and Ace2 are related with high level of organophosphates resistance in Aphis gossypii[J]. Environmental Toxicology, 2014, 29(5): 526-533.

doi: 10.1002/tox.v29.5
[35]
Sindhu T, Venkatesan T, Prabhu D, Jeyakanthan J, Gracy G R, Jalali S K, Rai A. Insecticide-resistance mechanism of Plutella xylostella (L.) associated with amino acid substitutions in acetylcholinesterase-1: A molecular docking and molecular dynamics investigation[J]. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 2018, 77: 240-250.

doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.09.004
[36]
Wang C C, Dong W Y, Shang J, Li H B, Chen Z, Zhu B, Liang P, Shi X Y. S431F mutation on AChE1 and overexpression of P450 genes confer high pirimicarb resistance in Sitobion miscanthi[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2024, 202: 105957.

doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2024.105957
[37]
Cheng S, Song W, Yuan X, Xu Y. Gorge motions of acetylcholinesterase revealed by microsecond molecular dynamics simulations[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 3219.

doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03088-y pmid: 28607438
[1] BAI JingJing, ZHANG YuChen, NI ZiJie, GAO JiaYong, LIU WeiYang, GAI DongSheng, WANG YuHang, HE JiaQing, ZHANG Qiang, SHAO XiWen, WU Ying, GENG YanQiu, GUO LiYing. Effects of Different Irrigation Volumes on Lodging Resistance Characteristics and Yield of Rice in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(9): 1848-1868.
[2] GUO Yue, ZHANG YunLong, LIU DeCai, WANG JunYu, LIU HuangJie, SHAO XiaoQi, PENG Qi, YU ShiCheng, QI YuRong, GAO JianQin, ZHANG JieFu, HU MaoLong. The Cross-Resistance Mechanism of Rapeseed 5N to ALS Inhibitor Herbicides [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(9): 1887-1902.
[3] LUO HaiQin, LUO RenLin, LIU TingHui, GUO WeiLong, ZENG ZiXian, ZHU Bo. Progress, Challenges, and Strategies in Lodging Resistance Research of Gramineous Crops [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(8): 1587-1607.
[4] WANG XiaoWei, DU FoLi, YAN HongCai, LANG ZhengDong, DANG ZhiJuan, LI BaoChun, WANG JunCheng, MA XiaoLe, WANG HuaJun, ZHANG Hong, YAO LiRong. Evaluation of Drought Resistance of 396 Spring Wheat Varieties at Grain Filling Stage and Maturity Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(8): 1608-1621.
[5] ZHAO SiJie, REN JiaXin, NAN JiangLei, WANG XingYun, CHENG WeiNing. Relationships Between Secondary Metabolite Contents and Related Gene Expression in Maize Leaves and Their Resistance to Spodoptera frugiperda [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(8): 1686-1696.
[6] ZHANG DongMei, ZHOU XinXin, XIAO GuiLin, ZENG XiangGuo, WANG ChunYan, WANG ZeXian, HAN YongChao. Phenotypic Characteristics of Strawberry Floral Organs in Response to Botrytis cinerea Infection and Methods for Gray Mold Resistance Evaluation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1456-1466.
[7] JIAO WenJuan, HE WanLong, GENG HongWei, BAI Bin, LI JianFeng, CHENG YuKun. Stripe Rust Resistance Evaluation and Molecular Characterization of Yr Genes for 155 Spring Wheat Varieties (Lines) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 937-950.
[8] LIU HaiQing, JIN JiaoJiao, SUN WanCang, CHAI Peng, QI WeiLiang, YANG Gang, LI Chan, LUO XueMei, SU YunYun, QIN XueXue. Morphogenesis of the Low-Growth Point and Its Multi-Hormonal Regulatory Mechanism During Overwintering in Winter Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 951-966.
[9] CUI ShiYou, CHEN PengJun, MIAO YuanQing, HAN JiJun, SHEN JunMing. Development and Field Evaluation of Glyphosate-Resistant Wheat Germplasm Generated Through EMS Mutagenesis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 723-733.
[10] LI Hao, GAO XinJu, LU Peng, ZHAN QianYuan, WANG Ran, SU Qi, QU Cheng. Resistance Monitoring and Inheritance of Resistance to Spinetoram in Spodoptera litura [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(18): 4048-4055.
[11] YAO FangJie, YANG ManYu, GAN XueQin, YANG Ning, ZENG LingYun, LI Jun, YANG WuYun, YANG EnNian. Genetic Composition Analysis of a New Multi-Resistant and High- Yield Wheat Variety, Chuanmai 82 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(16): 3465-3475.
[12] WU JianHui, ZENG QingDong, LIU ShengJie, WANG XiaoJie, HAN DeJun, KANG ZhenSheng. Advances in Mechanisms and Innovative Improvement Strategies for Wheat Disease Resistance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(16): 3556-3576.
[13] WANG Qi, GUO ShuangQi, MEI LanXin, WU ChengDong, ZHENG ChangHong, ZHOU Qin, CAI Jian, WANG Xiao, Huang Mei, ZHONG YingXin, JIANG Dong. Regulation of Wheat Lodging Resistance Through Culm Structure Optimization and Synergistic by Uniconazole and Prohexadione Calcium [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(15): 3283-3301.
[14] MA YaJun, YAN YaJun, YANG WeiDi, YANG TianHui, WANG Chuan, GAO Ting. Research Progress on Germplasm Innovation and Comprehensive Utilization of Forage Triticale [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(14): 2993-3005.
[15] MAO JiaQi, WU BangBang, ZHAO JiaJia, HAO YuQiong, ZHENG XingWei, WU JianHui, ZENG QingDong, LIU MinJie, ZHENG Jun. Evaluation of Rust Resistance in the Seedling Stage of Wheat Varieties and Disease-Resistant Gene Detection in Shanxi Province, China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(14): 3006-3021.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!