Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (8): 1686-1696.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.08.007

• PLANT PROTECTION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Relationships Between Secondary Metabolite Contents and Related Gene Expression in Maize Leaves and Their Resistance to Spodoptera frugiperda

ZHAO SiJie(), REN JiaXin, NAN JiangLei, WANG XingYun, CHENG WeiNing*()   

  1. College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University/Key Laboratory of Plant Protection Resources and Pest Management of Ministry of Education, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi
  • Received:2026-01-09 Accepted:2026-03-12 Online:2026-04-16 Published:2026-04-21
  • Contact: CHENG WeiNing

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aims to explore the relationship between the resistance of maize (Zea mays) to Spodoptera frugiperda and the content of secondary metabolites (ferulic acid, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid and DIMBOA) in leaves, as well as the gene expression of key enzymes ZmPALs and ZmBXs in their synthesis pathways, so as to provide theoretical guidance for the breeding of insect-resistant maize varieties.【Method】The resistance difference of six maize varieties cultivated in Shaanxi Province to S. frugiperda was evaluated by using artificial insect inoculation at maize whorl stage and leaf-feeding methods, with plant damage ratings, and development and reproduction parameters of S. frugiperda after feeding as indicators. Contents of three phenolic acids and DIMBOA were determined by colorimetry and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), respectively. Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was used to determine mRNA expression levels of ZmPAL6, ZmPAL7, ZmBX10, and ZmBX11 in maize leaves of different varieties at 0, 6, and 18 h after infestation. And then, the relationships between secondary metabolite contents and resistance indicators measured were studied by correlation analysis.【Result】Among the maize varieties tested, Zhengdan958, Qinlong14 and Shanke16 showed less damage, with mean ratings lower than 4.20 at 7-14 d after S. frugiperda infestation, while Zhengda12, Jiyuan1 and Dedan123 suffered the heaviest damage, with ratings from 4.31 to 7.22. Moreover, S. frugiperda larvae and pupae had the fastest development and significantly greater weight; adults had significantly longer lifespan and oviposition duration, as well as higher fecundity on Zhengda12 and Jiyuan1 compared to other varieties. By contrast, the slowest larvae development, significantly lower larval and pupal weight, longer adult preoviposition period lifespan, shorter oviposition duration and lower fecundity occurred on Zhengdan958, followed by Qinlong14 and Shanke16. Correlation analysis results showed that contents of chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid and caffeic acid in maize leaves showed significantly negative correlation with plant damage rating and larval weight of S. frugiperda, and significantly positive correlation with larval developmental period. In addition, chlorogenic acid content exhibited significantly negative correlation with pupal weight. DIMBOA content had significantly negative correlation with plant damage rating. The expressions of ZmPAL6, ZmPAL7, ZmBX10 and ZmBX11 were significantly induced by larval feeding. Whether non-infested or 6 and 18 h after infested plants, the expression levels of these four genes in Zhengdan958 and Qinlong14 were significantly higher than those in Jiyuan1 and Zhengda12.【Conclusion】Maize varieties Zhengdan958, Qinlong14 and Shanke16 planted in Shaanxi Province exhibit certain resistance to damage and growth and development of S. frugiperda, and their resistance is closely related to the contents of three phenolic acids and DIMBOA as well as the expression levels of ZmPALs and ZmBXs in leaves.

Key words: Spodoptera frugiperda, maize variety, resistance, secondary metabolite, gene expression

Table 1

Primers used in this study"

引物名称Primer name 正向引物Forward primer (5°-3°) 反向引物Reverse primer (5°-3°)
ZmPAL6 GATCGGCAAGCTCATGTTCG CCCTTGAAGCCGTAGTCCAG
ZmPAL7 AGGGTCTTGCGATGGTGAA TGGGTCAGGTGGTCAGTGTA
ZmBx10 CGTAAACGCCTTGCTGAACA ACCACCGACGTCAACCAA
ZmBx11 ACCCTTCTCCAGATCCTCGC GTCAACCTGTAGACGACGACA
ZmGADPH AAACTGCCTTGCTCCCCTT GAAGAACTTTACCAACAGCCTTG

Fig. 1

Damage rating of different maize varieties at 7 and 14 d after infestation of S. frugiperda Data in the figure are mean±SE of three replicates. Different letters on the same-colored bars indicate significant differences at P<0.05 level by Duncan’s multiple range test. The same as below figures"

Table 2

Larval and pupal duration and adult longevity (d) of S. frugiperda fed on different maize varieties"

发育阶段
Developmental stage
正大12
Zhengda12
纪元1号
Jiyuan1
德单123
Dedan123
陕科16
Shanke16
秦龙14
Qinlong14
郑单958
Zhengdan958
幼虫Larva 13.01±0.11d 13.22±0.09d 14.30±0.18c 16.68±0.30b 17.58±0.35a 17.60±0.06a
预蛹Prepupa 1.06±0.02c 0.96±0.03d 1.28±0.11a 1.13±0.03bc 1.16±0.06b 1.14±0.05bc
蛹Pupa 7.93±0.16c 7.56±0.13c 9.08±0.20b 11.14±0.20a 10.95±0.14a 9.21±0.25b
雌成虫Female adult 16.50±0.84a 16.73±0.79a 13.23±0.84b 13.28±0.94b 11.36±1.00c 13.45±0.78b
雄成虫Male adult 16.87±0.66a 17.26±0.81a 11.40±0.51c 11.46±0.44c 11.34±0.48c 13.36±0.45b

Fig. 2

Larval (A) and pupal (B) weight of S. frugiperda fed on different maize varieties"

Table 3

Adult preoviposition period, oviposition duration, and fecundity of S. frugiperda fed with different maize varieties"

玉米品种Maize variety 产卵前期Preoviposition period (d) 产卵期Oviposition duration (d) 单雌产卵量Fecundity
纪元1号Jiyuan1 1.17±0.23c 6.33±0.57a 1152.83±137.80a
正大12 Zhengda12 1.22±0.18c 6.38±0.57a 1145.63±106.01a
秦龙14 Qinlong14 1.50±0.23b 5.27±0.38b 1069.45±91.12a
德单123 Dedan123 1.63±0.22b 5.23±0.21b 1009.00±89.31a
陕科16 Shanke16 1.67±0.22b 5.10±0.62b 1016.00±123.94a
郑单958 Zhengdan958 2.88±0.52a 4.25±0.75c 910.75±160.61b

Fig. 3

Content of secondary metabolites in leaves of different maize varieties"

Table 4

Correlation between content of secondary metabolites in maize leaves and resistance indicators of maize to S. frugiperda"

生物学指标
Biological indicator
阿魏酸Ferulic acid 咖啡酸Caffeic acid 绿原酸Chlorogenic acid 丁布DIMBOA
r P r P r P r P
7 d受害等级7 d Damage rating -0.879* 0.021 -0.870* 0.024 -0.950** 0.004 -0.879* 0.021
14 d受害等级14 d Damage rating -0.911* 0.012 -0.896* 0.016 -0.975** 0.002 -0.777 0.069
幼虫历期Larval duration 0.859* 0.028 0.839* 0.037 0.956** 0.003 0.771 0.072
幼虫体重Larval weight -0.840* 0.036 -0.827* 0.042 -0.918* 0.010 -0.706 0.117
蛹重Pupal weight -0.743 0.056 -0.706 0.076 -0.899** 0.007 -0.602 0.153
单雌产卵量Fecundity -0.392 0.493 -0.319 0.538 -0.623 0.187 -0.803 0.054

Fig. 4

Relative expression levels of ZmPAL and ZmBx in different maize varieties after S. frugiperda feeding for 0-18 h * indicates significant difference at P<0.05 level by t-test"

[1]
陈浩梁, 林璐璐, 钟永志, 张峰, 谢明惠, 张光玲, 苏卫华. 草地贪夜蛾对不同生育期玉米产量的影响及防治指标. 植物保护学报, 2022, 49(6): 1705-1711.
CHEN H L, LIN L L, ZHONG Y Z, ZHANG F, XIE M H, ZHANG G L, SU W H. Effects of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda on corn yield at different growth stages and the control threshold. Journal of Plant Protection, 2022, 49(6): 1705-1711. (in Chinese)
[2]
WU Q L, HE L M, SHEN X J, JIANG Y Y, LIU J, HU G, WU K M. Estimation of the potential infestation area of newly-invaded fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda in the Yangtze River Valley of China. Insects, 2019, 10(9): 298.

doi: 10.3390/insects10090298
[3]
FU Y, WU T, YU H, XU J, ZHANG J Z, FU D Y, YE H. The transcription of flight energy metabolism enzymes declined with aging while enzyme activity increased in the long-distance migratory moth, Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects, 2022, 13(10): 936.

doi: 10.3390/insects13100936
[4]
BANSON K E, ASARE D K, DERY F D, BOAKYE K, BONIFACE A, ASAMOAH M, AWOTWE L E. Impact of fall armyworm on farmer’s maize: Systemic approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2020, 33(2): 237-264.

doi: 10.1007/s11213-019-09489-6
[5]
GUTIÉRREZ-MORENO R, MOTA-SANCHEZ D, BLANCO C A, WHALON M E, TERÁN-SANTOFIMIO H, RODRIGUEZ-MACIEL J C, DIFONZO C. Field-evolved resistance of the fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to synthetic insecticides in Puerto Rico and Mexico. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2019, 112(2): 792-802.

doi: 10.1093/jee/toy372
[6]
ZHANG D D, XIAO Y T, XU P J, YANG X M, WU Q L, WU K M. Insecticide resistance monitoring for the invasive populations of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(3): 783-791.

doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63392-5
[7]
NOGUEIRA L, COSTA E N, DI BELLO M M, DINIZ J F S, RIBEIRO Z A, BOIÇA JÚNIOR A L. Oviposition preference and antibiosis to Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazilian maize landraces. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2019, 112(2): 939-947.

doi: 10.1093/jee/toy388
[8]
PAMIDI L S, SEKHAR J C, YATHISH K R, KARJAGI C G, RAO K S, SUBY S B, RAKSHIT S. Characterization of antixenosis and antibiosis resistance to the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) in maize. Phytoparasitica, 2025, 53(1): 4.

doi: 10.1007/s12600-024-01228-5
[9]
牛浩, 兰珍珍, 王新谱, 刘媛, 牛通. 草地贪夜蛾对7种寄主植物的选择性和适应性. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 52(8): 112-121.
NIU H, LAN Z Z, WANG X P, LIU Y, NIU T. Selectivity and adaptation of Spodoptera frugiperda to 7 host plants. Journal of Northwest A& F University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 52(8): 112-121. (in Chinese)
[10]
徐川峰, 萨日那, 何佳玥, 郭笑, 芦芳, 成玮, 胡高, 陈法军, 万贵钧, 赵婧妤. 草地贪夜蛾对不同品种玉米的适应性比较研究. 环境昆虫学报, 2021, 43(4): 891-900.
XU C F, SA R N, HE J Y, GUO X, LU F, CHENG W, HU G, CHEN F J, WAN G J, ZHAO J Y. Comparative study on the adaptability of Spodoptera frugiperda to different corn varieties. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2021, 43(4): 891-900. (in Chinese)
[11]
张楠, 陈婷, 李小凤, 李武, 肖汉祥, 李高科. 54份鲜食玉米品种草地贪夜蛾抗虫性鉴定与评价. 广东农业科学, 2021, 48(12): 25-32.
ZHANG N, CHEN T, LI X F, LI W, XIAO H X, LI G K. Identification and evaluation of resistance of 54 fresh corn hybrids to fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 48(12): 25-32. (in Chinese)
[12]
陈建, 漆学伟, 洪霖, 梁玉勇. 不同玉米品种对草地贪夜蛾田间抗性与室内适合度评估. 江西农业大学学报, 2024, 46(6): 1466-1477.
CHEN J, QI X W, HONG L, LIANG Y Y. Field resistance and laboratory fitness of different maize varieties to Spodoptera frugiperda. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2024, 46(6): 1466-1477. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.3724/aauj.2024127
[13]
PACIFICO D, MUSMECI S, DEL PULGAR J S, ONOFRI C, PARISI B, SASSO R, MANDOLINO G, LOMBARDI-BOCCIA G. Caffeic acid and α-chaconine influence the resistance of potato tuber to Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). American Journal of Potato Research, 2019, 96(4): 403-413.

doi: 10.1007/s12230-019-09726-7
[14]
KUNDU A, MISHRA S, VADASSERY J. Spodoptera litura-mediated chemical defense is differentially modulated in older and younger systemic leaves of Solanum lycopersicum. Planta, 2018, 248(4): 981-997.

doi: 10.1007/s00425-018-2953-3
[15]
YANG J, SUN X Q, YAN S Y, PAN W J, ZHANG M X, CAI Q N. Interaction of ferulic acid with glutathione S-transferase and carboxylesterase genes in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2017, 43(7): 693-702.

doi: 10.1007/s10886-017-0859-3
[16]
LIU D M, HE J, LI Q, ZHANG X, WANG Y S, SUN Q G, WANG W H, ZHANG M L, WANG Y L, XU H S, et al. A WRKY transcription factor confers broad-spectrum resistance to biotic stresses and yield stability in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025, 122(10): e2411164122.
[17]
TZIN V, HOJO Y, STRICKLER S R, BARTSCH L J, ARCHER C M, AHERN K R, ZHOU S Q, CHRISTENSEN S A, GALIS I, MUELLER L A, JANDER G. Rapid defense responses in maize leaves induced by Spodoptera exigua caterpillar feeding. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017, 68(16): 4709-4723.

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx274
[18]
王世英, 朱启绽, 谭煜婷, 马千里, 王瑞飞, 张美芳, 徐汉虹, 张志祥. 草地贪夜蛾室内人工饲料群体饲养技术. 环境昆虫学报, 2019, 41(4): 742-747.
WANG S Y, ZHU Q Z, TAN Y T, MA Q L, WANG R F, ZHANG M F, XU H H, ZHANG Z X. Artificial diets and rearing technique of Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) in laboratory. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2019, 41(4): 742-747. (in Chinese)
[19]
TOEPFER S, FALLET P, KAJUGA J, BAZAGWIRA D, MUKUNDWA I P, SZALAI M, TURLINGS T C J. Streamlining leaf damage rating scales for the fall armyworm on maize. Journal of Pest Science, 2021, 94(4): 1075-1089.

doi: 10.1007/s10340-021-01359-2
[20]
MUSHTAQ W, FAUCONNIER M L, DE CLERCK C. Assessment of induced allelopathy in crop-weed co-culture with rye-pigweed model. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 10446.

doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60663-w pmid: 38714777
[21]
韩宪琪, 李雪娇, 冯淑娟, 成卫宁, 朱克岩. 小麦籽粒营养物质和次生物质含量与其对玉米象抗性的关系. 植物保护学报, 2017, 44(5): 721-728.
HAN X Q, LI X J, FENG S J, CHENG W N, ZHU K Y. Relationships between the contents of nutrients and secondary metabolites in wheat seeds and their resistance to Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Plant Protection, 2017, 44(5): 721-728. (in Chinese)
[22]
刘小春, 揭红东, 许妍, 许岳军, 揭雨成. GA3对苎麻生长和次生代谢物含量的影响. 草业科学, 2025, 42(7): 1830-1841.
LIU X C, JIE H D, XU Y, XU Y J, JIE Y C. Effects of GA3 on growth and secondary metabolite content in ramie. Pratacultural Science, 2025, 42(7): 1830-1841. (in Chinese)
[23]
侯笑林, 项立譞, 李明珠, 冯金晓. 响应面优化超声辅助法提取奇亚籽中咖啡酸及其抗氧化性测定. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 53(6): 906-912.
HOU X L, XIANG L X, LI M Z, FENG J X. Caffeic acid extracted from chia seeds by the response surface method optimized with ultrasonic-assisted and its antioxidant activity. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 53(6): 906-912. (in Chinese)
[24]
ZHANG X, LIU C J. Multifaceted regulations of gateway enzyme phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids. Molecular Plant, 2015, 8: 17-27.

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2014.11.001 pmid: 25578269
[25]
GUO J F, QI J F, HE K L, WU J Q, BAI S X, ZHANG T T, ZHAO J R, WANG Z Y. The Asian corn borer Ostrinia furnacalis feeding increases the direct and indirect defence of mid-whorl stage commercial maize in the field. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2019, 17(1): 88-102.

doi: 10.1111/pbi.2019.17.issue-1
[26]
黄欣蒸, 单双, 张丹丹, 张天涛, 石旺鹏, 张永军. 草地贪夜蛾取食诱导玉米叶片转录组分析. 植物保护学报, 2020, 47(4): 780-788.
HUANG X Z, SHAN S, ZHANG D D, ZHANG T T, SHI W P, ZHANG Y J. Transcriptome analysis of Zea mays leaves infested by fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda larvae. Journal of Plant Protection, 2020, 47(4): 780-788. (in Chinese)
[27]
LIVAK K J, SCHMITTGEN T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods, 2001, 25(4): 402-408.

doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
[28]
陈锐, 高贺, 张国军, 朱克岩, 成卫宁. 小麦籽粒次生物质对麦红吸浆虫幼虫解毒酶活性及基因表达的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(20): 4204-4214. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.20.009.
CHEN R, GAO H, ZHANG G J, ZHU K Y, CHENG W N. Effects of secondary metabolites in wheat kernels on activities of three detoxifying enzymes and related gene expression in Sitodiplosis mosellena. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(20): 4204-4214. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.20.009. (in Chinese)
[29]
SISAY B, SIMIYU J, MENDESIL E, LIKHAYO P, AYALEW G, MOHAMED S, SUBRAMANIAN S, TEFERA T. Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda infestations in East Africa: Assessment of damage and parasitism. Insects, 2019, 10(7): 195.

doi: 10.3390/insects10070195
[30]
NBOYINE J A, KUSI F, ABUDULAI M, BADII B K, ZAKARIA M, ADU G B, HARUNA A, SEIDU A, OSEI V, ALHASSAN S, YAHAYA A. A new pest, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) in tropical Africa: Its seasonal dynamics and damage in maize fields in northern Ghana. Crop Protection, 2020, 127: 104960.

doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104960
[31]
ZHANG Q Y, ZHANG Y L, QUANDAHOR P, GOU Y P, LI C C, ZHANG K X, LIU C Z. Oviposition preference and age-stage, two-sex life table analysis of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different maize varieties. Insects, 2023, 14(5): 413.

doi: 10.3390/insects14050413
[32]
刘树楠, 申国境, 李京, 张翠萍, SAIF U M, 吴建强, 王蕾, 宋伟, 王燚, 赵久然, 唐国文, 齐金峰. 先玉335、郑单958和京科968抗虫能力的比较研究. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(6): 52-57.
LIU S N, SHEN G J, LI J, ZHANG C P, SAIF U M, WU J Q, WANG L, SONG W, WANG Y, ZHAO J R, TANG G W, QI J F. Comparation of herbivore resistance among the maize lines Xianyu335, Zhengdan958, and Jingke968. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019, 27(6): 52-57. (in Chinese)
[33]
张云会, 王章训, 王新谱. 二斑叶螨在5个玉米品种上的种群参数特征与分析. 玉米科学, 2016, 24(2): 155-159.
ZHANG Y H, WANG Z X, WANG X P. Influences of five maize cultivars on the traits of population parameters of Tetranychus urticae Kouch. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2016, 24(2): 155-159. (in Chinese)
[34]
ZHANG Z F, LAN H, CAO H H, HU X X, FAN Y L, SONG Y, WU L J, LIU T X. Impacts of constitutive and induced benzoxazinoids levels on wheat resistance to the grain aphid (Sitobion avenae). Metabolites, 2021, 11: 783

doi: 10.3390/metabo11110783
[35]
李会平, 王志刚, 杨敏生, 张彦广, 黄大庄, 张世红. 杨树单宁与酚类物质种类及含量与光肩星天牛危害之间关系的研究. 河北农业大学学报, 2003, 26(1): 36-39.
LI H P, WANG Z G, YANG M S, ZHANG Y G, HUANG D Z, ZHANG S H. The relation between tannin and phenol constituents and resistance to Anoplophora glabripennis of various poplar tree species. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2003, 26(1): 36-39. (in Chinese)
[36]
左彤彤, 迟德富, 王牧原, 宇佳, 李晓灿, 王文帆. 不同品系杨树酚酸类物质对青杨脊虎天牛的驱避作用. 植物保护学报, 2008, 35(2): 160-164.
ZUO T T, CHI D F, WANG M Y, YU J, LI X C, WANG W F. Repellent effects of phenolic acids in different strain poplars to Xylotrechus rusticus. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2008, 35(2): 160-164. (in Chinese)
[37]
BETSIASHVILI M, AHREN K R, JANDER G. Additive effects of two quantitative trait loci that confer Rhopalosiphum maidis (corn leaf aphid) resistance in maize inbred line Mo17. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, 66(2): 571-578.

doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru379
[38]
SU Q, ZHOU Z, ZHANG J, SHI C, ZHANG G, JIN Z, WANG W, LI C. Effect of plant secondary metabolites on common cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomological Research, 2018, 48(1): 18-26.

doi: 10.1111/enr.2018.48.issue-1
[39]
CAMPOS F, ATKINSON J, ARNASON J T, PHILOGENE B J R, MORAND P, WERSTIUK N H, TIMMINS G. Toxicokinetics of 2, 4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1, 4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOA) in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1989, 15(7): 1989-2001.

doi: 10.1007/BF01207432
[40]
WANG Y, CAI Q N, ZHANG Q W, HAN Y. Effect of the secondary substances from wheat on the growth and digestive physiology of cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). European Journal of Entomology, 2006, 103(1): 255-258.

doi: 10.14411/eje.2006.030
[41]
潘忠玉, 莫夏娜, 孟香, 陈敏. 绿原酸对美国白蛾幼虫生长发育和解毒相关蛋白活性的影响. 昆虫学报, 2020, 63(9): 1081-1090.
PAN Z Y, MO X N, MENG X, CHEN M. Effects of chlorogenic acid on the growth and development and detoxification-related protein activities in Hyphantria cunea (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) larvae. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2020, 63(9): 1081-1090. (in Chinese)
[42]
李娜, 于希森, 李琪, 李涵哲, 李洋, 徐婷婷, 孟凡立. 大豆异黄酮合成关键酶基因对蚜虫取食的防御响应分析. 大豆科学, 2016, 35(5): 800-804.
LI N, YU X S, LI Q, LI H Z, LI Y, XU T T, MENG F L. The analysis of key gene of soybean isoflavone synthesis response to aphid feeding defense. Soybean Science, 2016, 35(5): 800-804. (in Chinese)
[43]
HE J, LIU Y Q, YUAN D Y, DUAN M J, LIU Y L, SHEN Z J, YANG C Y, QIU Z Y, LIU D M, WEN P Z, et al. An R2R3 MYB transcription factor confers brown planthopper resistance by regulating the phenylalanine ammonia-lyase pathway in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020, 117(1): 271-277.
[1] LUO HaiQin, LUO RenLin, LIU TingHui, GUO WeiLong, ZENG ZiXian, ZHU Bo. Progress, Challenges, and Strategies in Lodging Resistance Research of Gramineous Crops [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(8): 1587-1607.
[2] WANG XiaoWei, DU FoLi, YAN HongCai, LANG ZhengDong, DANG ZhiJuan, LI BaoChun, WANG JunCheng, MA XiaoLe, WANG HuaJun, ZHANG Hong, YAO LiRong. Evaluation of Drought Resistance of 396 Spring Wheat Varieties at Grain Filling Stage and Maturity Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(8): 1608-1621.
[3] ZHANG DongMei, ZHOU XinXin, XIAO GuiLin, ZENG XiangGuo, WANG ChunYan, WANG ZeXian, HAN YongChao. Phenotypic Characteristics of Strawberry Floral Organs in Response to Botrytis cinerea Infection and Methods for Gray Mold Resistance Evaluation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1456-1466.
[4] WANG JiaNuo, CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, WANG LiPing, NAN YunYou, HE Wei, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LiaoHao. Photo-Physiological Mechanism at Grain Filling Stage of No-Tillage with Plastic Re-Mulching to Increase Maize Yield in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[5] JIAO WenJuan, HE WanLong, GENG HongWei, BAI Bin, LI JianFeng, CHENG YuKun. Stripe Rust Resistance Evaluation and Molecular Characterization of Yr Genes for 155 Spring Wheat Varieties (Lines) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 937-950.
[6] LIU HaiQing, JIN JiaoJiao, SUN WanCang, CHAI Peng, QI WeiLiang, YANG Gang, LI Chan, LUO XueMei, SU YunYun, QIN XueXue. Morphogenesis of the Low-Growth Point and Its Multi-Hormonal Regulatory Mechanism During Overwintering in Winter Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 951-966.
[7] CUI ShiYou, CHEN PengJun, MIAO YuanQing, HAN JiJun, SHEN JunMing. Development and Field Evaluation of Glyphosate-Resistant Wheat Germplasm Generated Through EMS Mutagenesis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 723-733.
[8] LIAO TingLu, SHI YaFei, XIAO DongHao, SHE YangMengFei, GUO FuCheng, YANG JiuJu, TANG HaiJiang, LUO ChengKe. The Effect of Exogenous Nitroprusside on Sugar Metabolism in Rice Seedlings Under Alkaline Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 265-277.
[9] TAN XiBei, LAN XuYing, LIU ChongHuai, FAN XiuCai, JIANG JianFu, SUN Lei, LI Peng, YU ShuXin, ZHANG Ying. Changes of Secondary Metabolites in Grapes with Different Resistance Levels in Response to White Rot Infection [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1767-1778.
[10] YUE RunQing, LI WenLan, DING ZhaoHua, MENG ZhaoDong. Molecular Characteristics and Resistance Evaluation of Transgenic Maize LD05 with Stacked Insect and Herbicide Resistance Traits [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1269-1283.
[11] ZOU XiaoWei, XIA Lei, ZHU XiaoMin, SUN Hui, ZHOU Qi, QI Ji, ZHANG YaFeng, ZHENG Yan, JIANG ZhaoYuan. Analysis of Disease Resistance Induced by Ustilago maydis Strain with Overexpressed UM01240 Based on Transcriptome Sequencing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1116-1130.
[12] ZHANG TianYu, LI Bai, ZANG JinPing, CAO HongZhe, DONG JinGao, XING JiHong, ZHANG Kang. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of HMG Family Genes in Botrytis cinerea [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 704-718.
[13] ZHANG LinLin, GONG Rui, CUI YanLing, ZHONG XiongHui, LI Ye, LI RanHong, QIAN ZongWei. Effect Analysis of SmWRKY30 in Eggplant Resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum by Virus Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(3): 548-563.
[14] ZHANG XiangKun, LI JiaYing, QIAO RuMeng, HE JingLei, WANG Li, SHI XiaoXin, DU GuoQiang. Effects of GFabV Under Different Zn Levels on Photosynthetic Efficiency and Photosynthesis-Related Gene Expression of ‘Shine Muscat’ Grapevine [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(24): 5190-5200.
[15] QIN Lu, SHEN DanDan, JIANG XiaoLi, XIE HePing, AO YiJun, YANG Yang, ZHU Feng, XU RangWei, LIAO WenYue, CHENG YunJiang. Effect of Water Status on the Storability of Citrus Fruits Harvested Under Continuous Rainy Weather [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(24): 5259-5273.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!