Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (10): 1987-1999.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.10.009

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Spatial-Temporal Variability of Soil Nutrients and Assessment of Soil Fertility in Erhai Lake Basin

GUO YingXin1,2(),CHEN YongLiang1,MIAO Qi1,FAN ZhiYong3,SUN JunWei3,CUI ZhenLing1,LI JunYing2()   

  1. 1College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193
    2Yunnan Academy of Tobacco Agriculture Science, Yuxi 653100, Yunnan
    3Yunan Dali Tobacco Company, Dali 671000, Yunan
  • Received:2021-03-17 Accepted:2021-06-28 Online:2022-05-16 Published:2022-06-02
  • Contact: JunYing LI E-mail:yingxguo@163.com;ljy1250@163.com

Abstract:

【Objective】By studying the spatial-temporal variation characteristics of tobacco-planting soil nutrients in Erhai Lake Basin (ELB), the objective of grading evaluation and spatial visualization of tobacco-planting soil fertility in this region was achieved, so as to provide a scientific basis for the nutrient management, balanced fertilization, and the control of agricultural non-point source pollution of tobacco-planting areas in ELB.【Method】Based on the 964 tobacco-planting soil samples in ELB collected in 2011-2013, 2018 and 2020, this study explored the spatial-temporal variability of nutrients and regional distribution patterns by using Geostatistics, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology, and Fuzzy integrated fertility index method to quantify the soil fertility in tobacco-planting areas. 【Result】The average values of soil pH, soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), Olsen-P (AP) and available potassium (AK) of tobacco-planting soil in ELB were 7.3, 59.6 g·kg-1, 3.5 g·kg-1, 54.4 mg·kg-1, and 192.0 mg·kg-1, respectively, all of which belonging to moderate variation. Tobacco-planting soil was rich in SOM, TN, AP and AK, and the proportions of areas within the upper-middle level accounted for 85.2%, 93.8%, 94.5% and 78.8%, respectively, showing obvious variation at regional scale. The area of tobacco-planting soil fertility were graded to five levels (from high to low: I to V), which accounted for 8.4%, 25.0%, 40.3%, 23.3% and 3.0%, respectively. The pH of tobacco-planting soil was relatively alkaline in ELB, which was higher in the northern than in the southern; the highest concentrations of SOM and TN occurred in the northern and the western region; the areas with high AP concentration were distributed in patches in the northern, eastern and western region of Erhai Lake; the areas with high AK concentration were distributed in flakes in the northern and eastern of Erhai Lake. 【Conclusion】Collectively, the fertility of the tobacco-growing soil in ELB was in high level, and the high-quality soil areas above grade III were mainly distributed in the northern and eastern region. Meanwhile, the tobacco-planting soil in the northern and western Erhai Lake were rich in nitrogen and phosphorus, and there was a risk of agricultural non-point source pollution in the region.

Key words: tobacco field, soil nutrient, spatial-temporal variability, assessment of soil fertility, Erhai Lake Basin

Fig. 1

Map of soil sampling sites in tobacco-planting areas of Erhai Lake Basin"

Table 1

Threshold values of soil indicators in parabola- and S-type membership function"

阈值 Threshold value pH 有机质 Organic matter 全氮 Total N 有效磷 Olsen-P 速效钾 Available K
x1 5.0 15 0.9 10 50
x2 5.5 25 1.4 40 200
x3 7.0 35 2.5 / /
x4 7.5 45 3.5 / /

Table 2

Overall statistical characteristic of measured soil nutrients in Erhai Lake Basin"

年份
Year
项目
Item
样本数
Sample
size
95%置信区间
95% confidence
interval
均值
Mean
标准差
Standard
derivation
偏度
Skewness
峰度
Kurtosis
变异系数Variance
coefficient (%)
2011-
2013
pH 83 7.0-7.4 7.2 0.9 -1.1 -0.1 11.9
有机质Organic matter (g·kg-1) 84 48.7-56.9 52.8 19.0 0.6 -0.1 36.0
全氮Total N (g·kg-1) 82 2.5-3.0 2.8 1.1 0.7 0.3 37.9
有效磷Olsen-P (mg·kg-1) 81 34.2-42.7 38.5 19.2 0.9 0.2 50.0
速效钾Available K (mg·kg-1) 86 158.9-199.6 179.2 94.9 0.7 -0.1 53.0
2018 pH 222 7.1-7.3 7.2 0.8 -0.8 -0.5 11.6
有机质Organic matter (g·kg-1) 223 50.3-55.1 52.7 18.2 0.5 -0.4 34.5
全氮Total N (g·kg-1) 224 2.9-3.2 3.1 1.1 0.5 -0.5 36.6
有效磷Olsen-P (mg·kg-1) 224 52.7-59.9 56.3 27.4 -0.1 -0.9 48.7
速效钾Available K (mg·kg-1) 224 201.4-232.0 216.7 116.3 0.7 0.1 53.7
2020 pH 612 7.3-7.5 7.4 0.8 -1.0 -0.5 11.4
有机质Organic matter (g·kg-1) 641 60.5-65.1 62.8 29.4 0.2 -1.0 46.7
全氮Total N (g·kg-1) 641 3.6-3.9 3.7 1.8 0.2 -1.0 48.4
有效磷Olsen-P (mg·kg-1) 621 53.7-58.2 56.0 29.0 0.4 -0.3 51.8
速效钾Available K (mg·kg-1) 614 177.3-192.3 184.8 94.5 0.9 0.7 51.1
2011-
2020
pH 917 7.3-7.4 7.3 0.9 -0.9 -0.5 11.6
有机质Organic matter (g·kg-1) 948 57.9-61.3 59.6 26.7 0.4 -0.6 44.9
全氮Total N (g·kg-1) 947 3.4-3.6 3.5 1.7 0.5 -0.7 47.3
有效磷Olsen-P (mg·kg-1) 928 52.6-56.3 54.4 28.3 0.4 -0.4 52.0
速效钾Available K (mg·kg-1) 924 185.5-198.5 192.0 101.1 0.9 0.5 52.7

Table 3

The semivariogram models and the corresponding parameters of soil nutrients"

土壤养分
Soil fertility
理论模型
Theory model
块金值
Nugget
基台值
Sill
块基比
Nugget/Sill (%)
变程
Range (m)
决定系数
R2
残差
RSS
pH 高斯Gaussian 1.9E-03 9.1E-03 20.9 35507 0.540 3.31E-05
有机质Organic matter 高斯Gaussian 0.0672 0.2344 28.7 10219 0.235 7.37E-03
全氮Total N 高斯Gaussian 0.0807 0.2934 27.5 9023 0.151 0.0112
有效磷Olsen-P 高斯Gaussian 0.269 0.848 31.7 496925 0.541 0.2
速效钾Available K 高斯Gaussian 0.0134 0.0499 26.9 21477 0.705 5.14E-05

Fig. 2

The spatial distribution maps of soil nutrients in tobacco-planting areas of Erhai Lake Basin"

Table 4

The classification of soil nutrients in tobacco-planting areas of Erhai Lake Basin"

土壤养分
Soil fertility
项目
Item
极缺
Extreme deficiency

Deficiency
中下
Minor deficiency
中上
Moderate

Relatively abundance
极高
Abundance
有机质
Organic matter
分级标准 Grading standard (g·kg-1) <6 6-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 ≥40
百分比 Area percentage (%) 0 0.6 14.2 9.5 17.8 57.9
全氮
Total N
分级标准 Grading standard (g·kg-1) <0.5 0.5-0.75 0.75-1 1-1.5 1.5-2 ≥2
百分比 Area percentage (%) 0 0.4 5.8 15.9 8.1 69.8
有效磷
Olsen-P
分级标准 Grading standard (mg·kg-1) <3 3-5 5-10 10-20 20-40 ≥40
百分比 Area percentage (%) 0.5 0.2 4.8 13.0 37.2 44.3
速效钾
Available K
分级标准 Grading standard (mg·kg-1) <30 30-50 50-100 100-150 150-200 ≥200
百分比 Area percentage (%) 0 1.9 19.3 28.6 11.5 38.7

Table 5

Correlations value, the average of correlations value and weights value among soil nutrients"

pH 有机质Organic matter 全氮 Total N 有效磷Olsen-P 速效钾Available K
pH 1
有机质Organic matter 0.222** 1
全氮Total N 0.195** 0.965** 1
有效磷Olsen-P -0.242** 0.243** 0.263** 1
速效钾Available K 0.231** 0.060 0.021 0.236** 1
平均值Correlations average 0.223 0.373 0.361 0.246 0.137
权重系数Weights value 0.166 0.278 0.269 0.185 0.102

Fig. 3

Distribution of soil fertility of tobacco-planting areas in Erhai Lake Basin"

Fig. 4

Soil fertility level distribution in tobacco-planting areas of Erhai Lake Basin"

[1] 李春俭. 烤烟养分资源综合管理理论与实践. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2006.
LI C J. The Integrated Nutrient Management of Flue-cured Tobacco. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2006. (in Chinese)
[2] 刘国顺. 烟草栽培学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
LIU G S. Tobacco Cultivation. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press, 2003. (in Chinese)
[3] 唐远驹. 试论特色烟叶的形成和开发. 中国烟草科学, 2004, 25(1): 10-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2004.01.013.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2004.01.013
TANG Y J. Formation and development of tobacco with characteristics. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2004, 25(1): 10-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2004.01.013. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2004.01.013
[4] 王树会, 邵岩, 李天福, 邓云龙. 云南12个地州植烟土壤养分状况与施肥对策. 土壤通报, 2006, 37(4): 684-687. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2006.04.014.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2006.04.014
WANG S H, SHAO Y, LI T F, DENG Y L. Analysis on soil nutrition and fertilizer strategy in 12 regions of Yunnan Province. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2006, 37(4): 684-687. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2006.04.014. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2006.04.014
[5] 大理白族自治州环境保护局. 大理白族自治州2008年环境状况公报. 云南大理州, 2009.
Dali Prefecture Bureau of Environmental Protection. Dali prefecture 2008 environmental status bulletin. Dali Prefecture, 2009. (in Chinese)
[6] 董利民, 李璇. 洱海水污染动态模型的构建及分析研究. 生态经济(学术版), 2011(2): 384-388.
DONG L M, LI X. Constructing and analyzing the dynamic model of Erhai Lake water pollution. Ecological Economy, 2011(2): 384-388. (in Chinese)
[7] 项颂, 吴越, 吕兴菊, 高思佳, 储昭升, 庞燕. 洱海流域农业面源污染空间分布特征及分类控制策略. 环境科学研究, 2020, 33(11): 2474-2483. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.10.09.
doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.10.09
XIANG S, WU Y, LÜ X J, GAO S J, CHU Z S, PANG Y. Characteristics and spatial distribution of agricultural non-point source pollution in Erhai Lake Basin and its classified control strategy. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 33(11): 2474-2483. doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.10.09. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2020.10.09
[8] 卢中辉, 余斌, 张辉, 杨振. 洱海流域农业面源污染与水环境变化的关联分析. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 51(2): 215-223. doi: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2017.02.015.
doi: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2017.02.015
LU Z H, YU B, ZHANG H, YANG Z. Correlation analysis of agricultural non-point source pollution and water environment change in Erhai Lake watershed. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2017, 51(2): 215-223. doi: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2017.02.015. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2017.02.015
[9] 邓阳春, 梁永江, 袁玲, 黄建国. 烟地土壤养分淋失与利用研究. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(2): 21-24. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2009.02.035.
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2009.02.035
DENG Y C, LIANG Y J, YUAN L, HUANG J G. Study on the nutrient leaching and utilization in tobacco-grown soil. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(2): 21-24. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2009.02.035. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2009.02.035
[10] 吕新, 魏亦农, 李少昆. 基于GIS的土壤肥力信息管理及棉花施肥推荐支持决策系统研究. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(7): 883-887. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.07.028.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.07.028
LÜ X, WEI Y N, LI S K. Research on management of soil fertility information and fertilization decision support system in cotton. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35(7): 883-887. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.07.028. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.07.028
[11] 李旭, 王海燕, 杨晓娟, 刘玲, 李卫松. 基于地统计学的土壤养分空间变异研究进展. 广东农业科学, 2012, 39(22): 65-69, 76. doi: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2012.22.024.
doi: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2012.22.024
LI X, WANG H Y, YANG X J, LIU L, LI W S. A review on spatial variability of soil nutrients based on geostatistics. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 39(22): 65-69, 76. doi: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2012.22.024. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2012.22.024
[12] LIU H B, SUN Z L, LUO X J, DONG X R, WU M Y. A spatial- temporal analysis of the effects of households’ land-use behaviors on soil available potassium in cropland: a case study from urban peripheral region in northeast China. Land, 2020, 9(5): 160. doi: 10.3390/land9050160.
doi: 10.3390/land9050160
[13] SEYEDMOHAMMADI J, NAVIDI M N, ESMAEELNEJAD L. Geospatial modeling of surface soil texture of agricultural land using fuzzy logic, geostatistics and GIS techniques. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2019, 50(12): 1452-1464. doi: 10.1080/00103624.2019.1626870.
doi: 10.1080/00103624.2019.1626870
[14] 常乃杰, 张云贵, 李志宏, 刘青丽, 李军营, 杨宇虹. 云南玉溪植烟土壤速效养分空间变异特征及应用. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(1): 7-13. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20170102.
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20170102
CHANG N J, ZHANG Y G, LI Z H, LIU Q L, LI J Y, YANG Y H. Spatial variability of soil available nutrients and its application in tobacco growing areas at Yuxi City of Yunnan. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2017(1): 7-13. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20170102. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20170102
[15] 徐辰生, 陈爱国, 徐茜, 戴培刚, 刘光亮, 陶健. 南平烟区植烟土壤肥力评价研究. 中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(4): 24-29. doi: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.04.005.
doi: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.04.005
XU C S, CHEN A G, XU Q, DAI P G, LIU G L, TAO J. Integrated evaluation of soil fertility in Nanping tobacco planting areas. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2016, 37(4): 24-29. doi: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.04.005. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.04.005
[16] 倪明, 濮永瑜, 何翔, 胡志明, 伏成秀, 刘芮, 张庆, 段焰, 杨佩文, 朱红业. 保山市植烟土壤养分时空变异特征及土壤肥力适宜性评价. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(10): 2303-2309. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.10.026.
doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.10.026
NI M, PU Y Y, HE X, HU Z M, FU C X, LIU R, ZHANG Q, DUAN Y, YANG P W, ZHU H Y. Soil nutrients spatial-temporal variability and soil fertility suitability in Baoshan tobacco-planting area. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 33(10): 2303-2309. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.10.026. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2020.10.026
[17] 冯晓, 乔淑, 胡峰, 马中杰. 土壤养分空间变异研究进展. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(7): 1738-1741. doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2010.07.018.
doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2010.07.018
FENG X, QIAO S, HU F, MA Z J. Advance on spatial variability of soil nutrients. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 49(7): 1738-1741. doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2010.07.018. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2010.07.018
[18] 王新中, 樊在斗, 李再光, 王德勋, 户艳霞, 徐发华. 大理烟区不同类型植烟土壤养分状况分析. 中国烟草学报, 2015, 21(6): 54-58. doi: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2014.583.
doi: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2014.583
WANG X Z, FAN Z D, LI Z G, WANG D X, HU Y X, XU F H. Analysis of nutrient status in different types of tobacco-growing soil in Dali. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2015, 21(6): 54-58. doi: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2014.583. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2014.583
[19] 宋淑芳, 周冀衡, 邓小华, 张一扬, 李强. 大理植烟土壤养分含量及其对烟叶生产的适宜性. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 38(1): 16-21. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1238.2012.00016.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1238.2012.00016
SONG S F, ZHOU J H, DENG X H, ZHANG Y Y, LI Q. Tobacco soil fertility and suitability for the tobacco production in Dali tobacco areas. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2012, 38(1): 16-21. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1238.2012.00016. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1238.2012.00016
[20] 黄俊杰. 大理州植烟土壤养分时空变化特征及烤烟施肥优化[D]. 昆明: 云南农业大学, 2016.
HUANG J J. Study on temporal and spatial variations of soil nutrient contents and fertilization optimization for flue-cured production in Dali[D]. Kunming: Yunan Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese)
[21] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. 3rd ed. Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[22] 陈美球, 潘柳芳, 黄小燕, 黎茶根, 郭熙, 罗志军. 基于GIS的瑞金市耕地植烟适宜性评价. 土壤通报, 2015, 46(1): 31-35. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2015.01.006.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2015.01.006
CHEN M Q, PAN L F, HUANG X Y, LI C G, GUO X, LUO Z J. Suitability evaluation for cultivated land planting tobacco in Ruijin based on GIS. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 46(1): 31-35. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2015.01.006. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2015.01.006
[23] 李玉宝, 王鹏, 张永革, 石刚, 付龙, 鲁琪飞. 贵州毕节主要植烟区土壤肥力综合评价. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(24): 156-160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2020.24.044.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2020.24.044
LI Y B, WANG P, ZHANG Y G, SHI G, FU L, LU Q F. Comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility in Bijie tobacco-growing areas of Guizhou Province. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(24): 156-160. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2020.24.044. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2020.24.044
[24] 张明发, 田峰, 李孝刚, 田茂成, 李明德, 彭曙光, 巢进, 蔡云帆, 吴海勇, 李双, 张黎明, 朱三荣, 吕启松. 基于烤烟生产的湘西植烟土壤质量综合评价. 中国烟草学报, 2017, 23(3): 87-97. doi: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2016.294.
doi: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2016.294
ZHANG M F, TIAN F, LI X G, TIAN M C, LI M D, PENG S G, CHAO J, CAI Y F, WU H Y, LI S, ZHANG L M, ZHU S R, LÜ Q S. Comprehensive assessment of soil quality in Xiangxi tobacco growing areas based on tobacco production. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2017, 23(3): 87-97. doi: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2016.294. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2016.294
[25] 王政, 张晓龙, 敖金成, 陈庭慧, 余东灿, 卢叶, 赵畅荣. 文山市不同生态区土壤养分的时空异质性及适宜性. 中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(6): 37-42. doi: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.06.007.
doi: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.06.007
WANG Z, ZHANG X L, AO J C, CHEN T H, YU D C, LU Y, ZHAO C R. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity and suitability of soil nutrients in different ecological regions of Wenshan City. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2016, 37(6): 37-42. doi: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.06.007. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13496/j.issn.1007-5119.2016.06.007
[26] 骆伯胜, 钟继洪, 陈俊坚. 土壤肥力数值化综合评价研究. 土壤, 2004, 36(1): 104-106, 111. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9829.2004.01.023.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9829.2004.01.023
LUO B S, ZHONG J H, CHEN J J. Integrated digitization evaluation on soil fertility. Soils, 2004, 36(1): 104-106, 111. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9829.2004.01.023. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9829.2004.01.023
[27] 李银科, 王菲, 羊波, 李忠, 章新. 土壤pH值对烟叶化学成分和品质的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(12): 98-100. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2013.12.101.
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2013.12.101
LI Y K, WANG F, YANG B, LI Z, ZHANG X. The effect of soil pH values on the chemical composition and quality of tobacco. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 41(12): 98-100. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2013.12.101. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2013.12.101
[28] 徐晓燕, 孙五三, 李章海, 李金才. 烤烟根系合成烟碱的能力及pH值对其根系和品质的影响. 安徽农业大学学报, 2004, 31(3): 315-319. doi: 10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.2004.03.013.
doi: 10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.2004.03.013
XU X Y, SUN W S, LI Z H, LI J C. Synthesis of nicotine of tabacco roots and effects of pH values on the roots growth and quality of tobacco. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2004, 31(3): 315-319. doi: 10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.2004.03.013. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.2004.03.013
[29] 赵晴月, 许世杰, 张务帅, 张哲, 姚智, 陈新平, 邹春琴. 中国玉米主产区土壤养分的空间变异及影响因素分析. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(15): 3120-3133. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.012.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.012
ZHAO Q Y, XU S J, ZHANG W S, ZHANG Z, YAO Z, CHEN X P, ZOU C Q. Spatial regional variability and influential factors of soil fertilities in the major regions of maize production of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(15): 3120-3133. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.012. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.15.012
[30] 蔡泽江. 有机物料调控红壤化学氮肥致酸效应的差异与机制[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2019.
CAI Z J. Effectiveness and mechanisms of organic materials affecting on red soil acidification from chemical N fertilizer[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2019. (in Chinese)
[31] LAURENT C, BRAVIN M N, CROUZET O, PELOSI C, TILLARD E, LECOMTE P, LAMY I. Increased soil pH and dissolved organic matter after a decade of organic fertilizer application mitigates copper and zinc availability despite contamination. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 709: 135927. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135927.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135927
[32] 漆智平, 唐树梅. 烤烟根际土壤pH值研究. 热带作物研究, 1995, 15(4): 33-36.
QI Z P, TANG S M. Study on pH value of flue-cured tobacco rhizosphere soil. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 1995, 15(4): 33-36. (in Chinese)
[33] MACKOWN C T, SUTTON T G. Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco. Agronomy Journal, 1997, 89(2): 183-189. doi: 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020006x.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020006x
[34] SU J E, CHEN Y J, ZHU Y M, XIANG J L, CHEN Y, HU B B, ZHU M L, XU A C, LI F L, REN K, ZOU C M. The response of Hongda, a flue-cured tobacco cultivar, to nitrogen fertilizer rate. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2021, 67(4): 536-550. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2020.1739658.
doi: 10.1080/03650340.2020.1739658
[35] CHEN Y J, REN K, HE X, CHEN Y, HU B B, HU X D, LI J Y, JIN Y, ZHAO Z X, ZOU C M. The response of flue-cured tobacco cultivar K326 to nitrogen fertilizer rate in China. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2020, 158(5): 371-382. doi: 10.1017/s0021859620000738.
doi: 10.1017/s0021859620000738
[36] 谢国雄, 楼旭平, 阮弋飞, 童小虎, 徐健. 浙江省农田土壤碳氮比特征及影响因素分析. 江西农业学报, 2020, 32(2): 51-55. doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2020.02.09.
doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2020.02.09
XIE G X, LOU X P, RUAN Y F, TONG X H, XU J. Characteristic and influencing factors of C/N ratio of farmland soil in Zhejiang Province. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2020, 32(2): 51-55. doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2020.02.09. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2020.02.09
[37] LIU Z P, SHAO M G, WANG Y Q. Spatial patterns of soil total nitrogen and soil total phosphorus across the entire Loess Plateau region of China. Geoderma, 2013, 197/198: 67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.12.011.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.12.011
[38] JI N N, WANG S R, ZHANG L. Characteristics of dissolved organic phosphorus inputs to freshwater lakes: a case study of Lake Erhai, southwest China. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 601/602: 1544-1555. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.265.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.265
[39] 严春丽, 赵明, 李泽坤, 李金, 段云松. 洱海北部入湖河流水质特征及其对北部湖区的影响. 环境工程, 2020, 38(12): 59-63, 5. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012011.
doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012011
YAN C L, ZHAO M, LI Z K, LI J, DUAN Y S. Water characteristics of inflow rivers in northern Erhai Lake and their impact on the northern lake area. Environmental Engineering, 2020, 38(12): 59-63, 5. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012011. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012011
[40] 杨品燕, 李绍媛. 洱海流域环境保护和综合管理浅析. 绿色科技, 2019(14): 197-198. doi: 10.16663/j.cnki.lskj.2019.14.070.
doi: 10.16663/j.cnki.lskj.2019.14.070
YANG P Y, LI S Y. Analysis on environmental protection and comprehensive management of Erhai Lake Basin. Journal of Green Science and Technology, 2019(14): 197-198. doi: 10.16663/j.cnki.lskj.2019.14.070. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16663/j.cnki.lskj.2019.14.070
[41] 张玲娥, 双文元, 云安萍, 牛灵安, 胡克林. 30年间河北省曲周县土壤速效钾的时空变异特征及其影响因素. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(5): 923-933. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.05.009.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.05.009
ZHANG L E, SHUANG W Y, YUN A P, NIU L A, HU K L. Spatio-temporal variability and the influencing factors of soil available potassium in 30 years in Quzhou County, Hebei Province. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(5): 923-933. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.05.009. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.05.009
[42] 黄利红, 周卫军, 田珂, 李江林, 薛涛. 基于GIS的醴陵市耕地土壤肥力变异研究. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 43(1): 156-161. doi: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2009.01.036.
doi: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2009.01.036
HUANG L H, ZHOU W J, TIAN K, LI J L, XUE T. Study on the changes of the cultivated soil fertility in Liling County based on GIS. Journal of Huazhong Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2009, 43(1): 156-161. doi: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2009.01.036. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2009.01.036
[43] 黄鹤, 朱列书. 烟草磷素营养及提高磷素利用率研究进展. 湖南农业科学, 2013(11): 54-57. doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2013.11.027.
doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2013.11.027
HUANG H, ZHU L S. Research progress on tobacco phosphorus nutrition and measures of enhancing the utilization rate of phosphorus. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2013(11): 54-57. doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2013.11.027. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2013.11.027
[44] 吴杰, 李向鹏, 陈鑫, 罗小飞, 刘奇东, 钱旎, 王建林, 冉茂, 陈涛, 徐鹏飞, 石孝均, 江厚龙. 重庆市涪陵区植烟土壤养分的适宜性评价及变异分析. 土壤, 2020, 52(1): 106-112. doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2020.01.015.
doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2020.01.015
WU J, LI X P, CHEN X, LUO X F, LIU Q D, QIAN N, WANG J L, RAN M, CHEN T, XU P F, SHI X J, JIANG H L. Assessment of feasibility and variation analysis of nutrient contents in tobacco- growing soil in Fuling County, Chongqing. Soils, 2020, 52(1): 106-112. doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2020.01.015. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2020.01.015
[45] 李晓宁, 高明, 王子芳. 重庆市植烟土壤肥力数值化综合评价. 西南农业学报, 2007, 20(1): 67-71. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2007.01.016.
doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2007.01.016
LI X N, GAO M, WANG Z F. Integrated digitization evaluation on tobacco soil fertility at Chongqing. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 20(1): 67-71. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2007.01.016. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2007.01.016
[46] FENG W Y, LIU S S, LI C C, LI X F, SONG F H, WANG B B, CHEN H Y, WU F C. Algal uptake of hydrophilic and hydrophobic dissolved organic nitrogen in the eutrophic lakes. Chemosphere, 2019, 214: 295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.070.
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.070
[47] GUO H Y, WANG X R, ZHU J G. Quantification of non-point sources phosphorus pollution in key protection area of Taihu Lake. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(1): 136-140.
[48] HOU M M, SHAO X H, JIN Q, GAO X L. A 15N tracing technique-based analysis of the fate of fertilizer N: a 4-year case study in Eastern China. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 2017, 63(1): 74-83. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2016.1182159.
doi: 10.1080/03650340.2016.1182159
[49] CHEN X P, CUI Z L, FAN M S, VITOUSEK P, ZHAO M, MA W Q, WANG Z L, ZHANG W J, YAN X Y, YANG J C, DENG X P, GAO Q, ZHANG Q, GUO S W, REN J, LI S Q, YE Y L, WANG Z H, HUANG J L, TANG Q Y, SUN Y X, PENG X L, ZHANG J W, HE M R, ZHU Y J, XUE J Q, WANG G L, WU L, AN N, WU L Q, MA L, ZHANG W F, ZHANG F S. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature, 2014, 514(7523): 486-489. doi: 10.1038/nature13609.
doi: 10.1038/nature13609
[50] CUI Z L, ZHANG H Y, CHEN X P, ZHANG C C, MA W Q, HUANG C D, ZHANG W F, MI G H, MIAO Y X, LI X L, GAO Q, YANG J C, WANG Z H, YE Y L, GUO S W, LU J W, HUANG J L, LV S H, SUN Y X, LIU Y Y, PENG X L, REN J, LI S Q, DENG X P, SHI X J, ZHANG Q, YANG Z P, TANG L, WEI C Z, JIA L L, ZHANG J W, HE M R, TONG Y N, TANG Q Y, ZHONG X H, LIU Z H, CAO N, KOU C L, YING H, YIN Y L, JIAO X Q, ZHANG Q S, FAN M S, JIANG R F, ZHANG F S, DOU Z X. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature, 2018, 555(7696): 363-366. doi: 10.1038/nature25785.
doi: 10.1038/nature25785
[51] MENG Q F, YUE S C, HOU P, CUI Z L, CHEN X P. Improving yield and nitrogen use efficiency simultaneously for maize and wheat in China: a review. Pedosphere, 2016, 26(2): 137-147. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60030-3.
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60030-3
[1] ZHU ChangWei,MENG WeiWei,SHI Ke,NIU RunZhi,JIANG GuiYing,SHEN FengMin,LIU Fang,LIU ShiLiang. The Characteristics of Soil Nutrients and Soil Enzyme Activities During Wheat Growth Stage Under Different Tillage Patterns [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4237-4251.
[2] JIN YuTing,LIU YunFeng,HU HongXiang,MU Jing,GAO MengYao,LI XianFan,XUE ZhongJun,GONG JingJing. Effects of Continuous Straw Returning with Chemical Fertilizer on Annual Runoff Loss of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Rice-Rape Rotation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1937-1951.
[3] ZHAO WeiSong,GUO QingGang,SU ZhenHe,WANG PeiPei,DONG LiHong,HU Qing,LU XiuYun,ZHANG XiaoYun,LI SheZeng,MA Ping. Characterization of Fungal Community Structure in the Rhizosphere Soil of Healthy and Diseased-Verticillium Wilt Potato Plants and Carbon Source Utilization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(2): 296-309.
[4] ZHAO Peng,LIU Ming,JIN Rong,CHEN XiaoGuang,ZHANG AiJun,TANG ZhongHou,WEI Meng. Effects of Long-Term Application of Organic Fertilizer on Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation and Distribution of Sweetpotato in Fluvo- Aquic Soil Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(10): 2142-2153.
[5] REN Tao,GUO LiXuan,ZHANG LiMei,YANG XuKun,LIAO ShiPeng,ZHANG YangYang,LI XiaoKun,CONG RiHuan,LU JianWei. Soil Nutrient Status of Oilseed Rape Cultivated Soil in Typical Winter Oilseed Rape Production Regions in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1606-1616.
[6] WEN YanChen,LI HaiYan,YUAN Liang,XU JiuKai,MA RongHui,LIN ZhiAn,ZHAO BingQiang. Effect of Long-Term Fertilization on Nutrient Distribution of Fluvo-Aquic Soil Profile [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4460-4469.
[7] WANG Li,WANG ZhaoHui,GUO ZiKang,TAO ZhenKui,ZHENG MingJun,HUANG Ning,GAO ZhiYuan,ZHANG XinXin,HUANG TingMiao. Differences of Main Nutrient Concentration in Wheat Grain Between Typical Locations of the Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(17): 3527-3540.
[8] FAN KaiKai,TONG XuZe,YAN YuChun,XIN XiaoPing,WANG Xu. Effect of Fairy Rings on Soil Respiration in Hulunber Meadow Steppe [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2595-2603.
[9] SHANG LiRong,WAN LiQiang,LI XiangLin. Effects of Organic Fertilizer on Soil Bacterial Community Diversity in Leymus chinensis Steppe [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2614-2624.
[10] LI Da,FANG HuaJun,WANG Di,XU LiJun,TANG XueJuan,XIN XiaoPing,NIE YingYing,Wuren qiqige. Coupling Mechanism of Herbage-Water-Nitrogen Fertilizer in Abandoned Farmland in Meadow Steppe [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2691-2702.
[11] ZHOU Zhi,LIU Yang,ZHANG LiMing,XU RuiNeng,SUN LiLi,LIAO Hong. Soil Nutrient Status in Wuyi Tea Region and Its Effects on Tea Quality-Related Constituents [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(8): 1425-1434.
[12] YAN ZhiHao,HU ZhiHua,WANG ShiChao,HUAI ShengChang,WU HongLiang,WANG JinYu,XING TingTing,YU XiChu,LI DaMing,LU ChangAi. Effects of Lime Content on Soil Acidity, Soil Nutrients and Crop Growth in Rice-Rape Rotation System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(23): 4285-4295.
[13] WEI ZhiBiao, BAI ZhaoHai, MA Lin, ZHANG FuSuo. Spatial Characteristics of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Flow in Natural Grassland of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(3): 523-534.
[14] WEI ZhiBiao, BAI ZhaoHai, MA Lin, ZHANG FuSuo. Spatial Characteristics of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Flow in Cultivated Grassland of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(3): 535-555.
[15] LI Wei-tao, LI Zhong-pei, LIU Ming, JIANG Chun-yu, WU Meng, CHEN Xiao-fen. Enzyme Activities and Soil Nutrient Status Associated with Different Aggregate Fractions of Paddy Soils Fertilized with Returning Straw for 24 Years [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(20): 3886-3895.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!