Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (23): 4285-4295.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.23.009

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Lime Content on Soil Acidity, Soil Nutrients and Crop Growth in Rice-Rape Rotation System

YAN ZhiHao1,HU ZhiHua2,WANG ShiChao1,HUAI ShengChang1,WU HongLiang1,WANG JinYu1,XING TingTing1,YU XiChu2,LI DaMing2,LU ChangAi1()   

  1. 1 Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory for Improving Arable Land/Key Laboratory of Soil Quality, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
    2 Jiangxi Institute of Red Soil/ National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Red Soil Improvement, Nanchang 330046
  • Received:2019-06-06 Accepted:2019-09-18 Online:2019-12-01 Published:2019-12-01
  • Contact: ChangAi LU E-mail:luchangai@caas.cn

Abstract:

【Objective】Soil acidification is becoming more and more serious, which reducing crop yield in rice-rape rotation system of southern of China. In this study, the effects of lime application on soil nutrients and crop growth in acidic soil were studied, and the response relationship between soil available nutrients, yield and crop nutrient uptake to soil pH was clarified, so as to provide theoretical basis for the improvement of acidified soil in paddy fields. 【Method】 From 2015 to 2018, the paddy field with soil pH 4.5 was selected in Jinxian county, Jiangxi province, and hydrated lime was used as acid soil modifier. Through laboratory simulation, the amount of hydrated lime under different soil pH values was calculated. Then field experiments were carried out with six soil pH gradients of pH 4.5, pH 5.0, pH 5.6, pH 6.3, pH 6.8, and pH 7.3. In 2015, in order to ensure that the pH value of the treated soil was basically consistent with the measured pH value, one year after the soil was uniformly planted, the hydrated lime was used for quantitative adjustment with a period of one year. 【Result】 (1) With the amounts of lime and soil pH increase, the contents of soil available nitrogen increased first and then decreased, the content of soil exchangeable Ca 2+ and exchangeable Mg 2+ increased significantly, and the content of soil available potassium and available phosphorus decreased significantly. (2) With the increase of lime contents and soil pH, crop yield first increased and then decreased. At pH 6.4 (equivalent to the amount of 6 145 kg·hm -2hydrated lime), the yield of rape reached the highest; compared with pH 4.5, the yield increased by 202.2%. At pH 6.8 (equivalent to the amount of 7 474 kg·hm -2hydrated lime), the rice yield reached the highest; compared with pH 4.5, the yield increased by 61.2%. When the yield was reduced by 50%, the soil pH thresholds of rape and rice were 4.7 and 4.2, respectively. (3) Soil pH significantly affected crop nutrient uptake content. With the increase of the amount of hydrated lime, the nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake contents in rape increased first and then decreased. The average increase of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake contents in rape from 2016 to 2018 was 59.5%-181.4%, 36.2%-188.8% and 65.7%-198.9%, respectively. The nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake contents in rice first increased and then decreased. The uptake content of rice was the highest at pH 6.8. Compared with that without lime application the average increase of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake of rice from 2016 to 2018 was 11.1%-88.6%, 13.5%-68.5% and 9.7%-66.1%, respectively.【Conclusion】Under the application of lime conditioner, the contents of soil available nitrogen and exchangeable Ca 2+ and exchangeable Mg 2+ were increased with the increase of soil pH, which promoted the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium nutrients of crops and increased the crop yield. Under the experiments conditions, the optimal dosage of lime in acid soil (pH 4.5) of rice -rape rotation system was about 6 500 kg·hm -2, which could obtain stable and high yield of crops in rice-rape rotation system of southern China.

Key words: soil acidity, soil nutrients, crop growth, soil pH, lime conditioner, rice-rape rotation

Table 1

Soil basic physical and chemical properties"

有机质
OM
(g·kg-1)
速效氮
Available N
(mg·kg-1)
有效磷
Available P
(mg·kg-1)
速效钾
Available K
(mg·kg-1)
全氮
Total N
(g·kg-1)
交换性钙
Exchangeable Ca
(mg·kg-1)
交换性镁
Exchangeable Mg
(mg·kg-1)
pH
27.7 62.75 30.65 97.5 1.49 252.72 21.19 4.52

Table 2

Addition content of lime at different soil pH values"

pH
4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0
石灰用量 Addition content of lime (kg·hm-2) 0 1492 3154 4815 6477 8139

Fig. 1

Relationship between soil pH and soil available nitrogen content"

Fig. 2

Relationship between soil pH and available P, available K content"

Fig. 3

Relationship between soil pH and exchangeable Ca2+ and Mg2+ content"

Fig. 4

Relationship between soil pH and crop yield"

Fig. 5

Relationship between soil pH and crop nutrient uptake content"

Table 3

Correlation analysis between soil pH, soil nutrient, nutrient uptake content and yield in rape season"

产量
Yield
吸氮量
N uptake content
吸磷量
P uptake content
吸钾量
K uptake content
速效氮
Available
N
有效磷
Available
P
速效钾
Available
K
交换性钙
Exchangeable Ca2+
交换性镁
Exchangeable Mg2+
吸氮量 N uptake content 0.923** 1
吸磷量 P uptake content 0.699 0.863* 1
吸钾量 K uptake content 0.929** 0.946** 0.818* 1
速效氮 Available N 0.881* 0.8 0.803 0.861* 1
有效磷 Available P -0.913* -0.549 -0.920** -0.660 -0.634 1
速效钾 Available K -0.897* -0.697 -0.673 -0.969** -0.737 0.863* 1
交换性钙 Exchangeable Ca2+ 0.857* 0.888* 0.994** 0.837* 0.847* -0.944** -0.691 1
交换性镁 Exchangeable Mg2+ 0.741 0.879* 0.973** 0.786 0.811 -0.910* -0.639 0.988** 1
pH 0.874* 0.931** 0.950** 0.927** 0.929** -0.992** -0.812* 0.971** 0.948**

Table 4

Correlation analysis between soil pH, soil nutrient, nutrient uptake content and yield in rice season"

产量
Yield
吸氮量
N uptake content
吸磷量
P uptake content
吸钾量
K uptake content
速效氮
Available
N
有效磷
Available
P
速效钾
Available
K
交换性钙
Exchangeable Ca2+
交换性镁
Exchangeable Mg2+
吸氮量 N uptake content 0.914* 1
吸磷量 P uptake content 0.791 0.858* 1
吸钾量 K uptake content 0.858* 0.972** 0.870* 1
速效氮 Available N 0.857* 0.966** 0.909* 0.920** 1
有效磷 Available P -0.784 -0.79 -0.574 -0.776 -0.641 1
速效钾 Available K -0.781 -0.819* -0.466 -0.819 -0.649 0.910* 1
交换性钙 Exchangeable Ca2+ 0.894* 0.853* 0.532 0.817* 0.714 -0.824* -0.950** 1
交换性镁 Exchangeable Mg2+ 0.896* 0.811 0.476 0.728 0.694 -0.768 -0.0891* 0.976** 1
pH 0.932** 0.836* 0.576 0.798 0.694 -0.878* -0.923** 0.976** 0.959**
[1] GUO J H, LIU X J, ZHANG Y, SHEN J L, HAN W X, ZHANG W F, CHRITIE P, GOULDING K W T, VITOUSEK P M, ZHANG F S, . Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science, 2010,327(5968):1008-1010.
doi: 10.1126/science.1182570 pmid: 20150447
[2] 周晓阳, 徐明岗, 周世伟, Colinet Gilles. 长期施肥下我国南方典型农田土壤的酸化特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21(6):1615-1621.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0629
ZHOU X Y, XU M G, ZHOU S W, GILLES C . Soil acidification characteristics of typical farmland in south China under long-term fertilization. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015,21(6):1615-1621. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2015.0629
[3] 于天一, 孙秀山, 石程仁, 王才斌 . 土壤酸化危害及防治技术研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2014,33(11):3137-3143.
YU T Y, SUN X S, SHI C R, WANG C B . Advances in soil acidification hazards and control techniques. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2014,33(11):3137-3143. (in Chinese)
[4] 吕贻忠, 李保国 . 土壤学 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
LÜ Y Z, LI B G . Soil Science. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. (in Chinese)
[5] 周娟, 袁珍贵, 郭莉莉, 屠乃美, 易镇邪, 李海林, 江巨鳌 . 土壤酸化对作物生长发育的影响及改良措施. 作物研究, 2013,27(1):96-101.
ZHOU J, YUAN Z G, GUO L L, TU N M, YI Z X, LI H L, JIANG J A . Effects of soil acidification on crop growth and development and improvement measures. Corp Research, 2013,27(1):96-101. (in Chinese)
[6] 胡敏, 向永生, 鲁剑巍 . 石灰用量对酸性土壤pH值及有效养分含量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(4):72-77.
HU M, XIANG Y S, LU J W . Effects of lime application rates on soil pH and available nutrient content in acidic soils. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017(4):72-77. (in Chinese)
[7] 唐明, 向金友, 袁茜, 谢冰, 程智敏, 蔡毅, 黄胜, 杨苹 . 酸性土壤施石灰对土壤理化性质、微生物数量及烟叶产质量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2015,43(12):91-93.
TANG M, XIANG Y S, YUAN Q, XIE B, CHENG Z M, CAI Y, HUANG S, YANG P . Effects of applying lime on physical and chemical properties, microbial quantities of acid soil and yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2015,43(12):91-93. (in Chinese)
[8] 胡向丹, 邓小华, 王丰, 王少先, 马莹, 彭宇, 邓井青, 郭亚利 . 黔西南州植烟土壤pH分布特征及其与土壤养分的关系. 安徽农业大学学报, 2014,41(6):1070-1074 .
HU X D, DENG X H, WANG F, WANG S X, MA Y, PENG Y, DENG J Q, GUO Y L . Soil pH characteristics and its relation to soil nutrients in Qianxi’nan tobacco-growing region. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2014,41(6):1070-1074. (in Chinese)
[9] HOLLAND J E, WHITE P J, GLENDINING M J, GOULDING, K W T, MCGRATH S P . Yield responses of arable crops to liming-An evaluation of relationships between yields and soil pH from a long-term liming experiment. European Journal of Agronomy, 2019,105:176-188.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2019.02.016 pmid: 31007524
[10] 喻崎雯, 马祖陆, 伊文超, 梁晓 . 不同土壤pH对普通野生稻生理特性的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2013,41(2):473-475, 478.
YU Q W, MA Z L, YI W C, LIANG X . Effects of soil pH on physiological characteristics of Oryza rufipogon Griff. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2013,41(2):473-475, 478. (in Chinese)
[11] 吴道铭, 傅友强, 于智卫, 沈宏 . 我国南方红壤酸化和铝毒现状及防治. 土壤, 2013,45(4):577-584.
WU D M, FU Y Q, YU Z W, SHEN H . Status of red soil acidification and aluminum toxicity in south China and prevention. Soils, 2013,45(4):577-584. (in Chinese)
[12] KOCHIAN L V, HOEKENGA O A, PINEROS M A . How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2004,55:459-493.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141655 pmid: 15377228
[13] 蔡泽江, 孙楠, 王伯仁, 徐明岗, 黄晶, 张会民 . 长期施肥对红壤pH、作物产量及氮、磷、钾养分吸收的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011,17(1):71-78.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2011.0110
CAI Z J, SUN N, WANG B R, XU M G, HUANG J, ZHANG H M . Effects of long-term fertilization on pH of red soil, crop yields and uptakes of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2011,17(1):71-78. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2011.0110
[14] 武际, 郭熙盛, 王文军, 朱宏斌 . 施用白云石粉对黄红壤酸度和油菜产量的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2006,28(1):55-58.
WU J, GUO X S, WANG W J, ZHU H B . Effect of dolomite application on soil acidity and yield of rapeseed on yellow-red soil. Chinese Journal of Oil Crops Sciences, 2006,28(1):55-58. (in Chinese)
[15] 曾廷廷, 蔡泽江, 王小利, 梁文君, 周世伟, 徐明岗 . 酸性土壤施用石灰提高作物产量的整合分析. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(13):2519-2527.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.011
ZENG T T, CAI Z J, WANG X L, LIANG W J, ZHOU S W, XU M G . Integrated analysis of liming for increasing crop yield in acidic soils. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(13):2519-2527. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.13.011
[16] 梅旭阳, 高菊生, 杨学云, 黄晶, 蔡泽江, 李冬初, 王伯仁, 柳开楼, 徐明岗, 张会民 . 红壤酸化及石灰改良影响冬小麦根际土壤钾的有效性. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22(6):1568-1577.
MEI X Y, GAOJ S, YANG X Y, HUANG J, CAI Z J, LI D C, WANG B R, LIU K L, XU M G, ZHANG H M . The response of soil potassium availability in rhizospheric soil of winter wheat to acidified and limed red soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016,22(6):1568-1577. (in Chinese)
[17] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
BAO S D. Analysis of Soil Agrochemistry. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[18] 曾勇军, 周庆红, 吕伟生, 谭雪明, 潘晓华, 石庆华 . 土壤酸化对双季早、晚稻产量的影响. 作物学报, 2014,40(5):899-907.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00899
ZENG Y J, ZHOU Q H, LÜ W S, TAN X M, PAN X H, SHI Q H . Effects of soil acidification on the yield of double season rice. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014,40(5):899-907. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00899
[19] 陈平平 . 酸化土壤对水稻产量和氮素利用效率的影响途径研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2015.
CHEN P P . Research on the influence of acidified soil on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[20] 蔡东, 肖文芳, 李国怀 . 施用石灰改良酸性土壤的研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(9):206-213.
CAI D, XIAO W F, LI G H . Advance on study of liming on acid soils. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010,26(9):206-213. (in Chinese)
[21] 杨静, 谭永锋, 肖志强, 刘建华, 龙卫平, 匡大春, 韦赵海, 刘益仁 . 不同剂量石灰对酸化稻田土壤养分含量及水稻产量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2015,43(36):175-176, 179.
YANG J, TAN Y F, XIAO Z Q, LIU J H, LONG W P, KUANG D C, WEI Z H, LIU Y R . Effects of different application doses of lime on acidification paddy soil and rice yield. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2015,43(36):175-176, 179. (in Chinese)
[22] FAGERIA, N K, BALIGER V C . Ameliorating soil acidity of tropical oxisols by liming for sustainable crop production. Advances in Agronomy, 2008,99:345-399.
[23] ZHENG S J . Crop production on acidic soils: Overcoming aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency. Annals of Botany, 2010,106:183-184.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq134 pmid: 20570831
[24] CHEN D M, LAN Z C, BAI X . Evidence that acidification induced declines in plant diversity and productivity are mediated by changes in below-ground communities and soil properties in a semi-arid steppe. Journal of Ecology, 2013,101(5):1322-1334.
doi: 10.1111/jec.2013.101.issue-5
[25] ELISAL A A, SHAMSHUDDIN J, CHE F I, ROSLAN I . Increasing rice production using different lime sources on an acid sulphate soil in merbok, malaysia. Tropical Agricultural Science, 2014,37(2):223-247.
[26] CAIRES E F, GARBUIO F J, CHURKA S, BARTH G, CORREA J C L . Effects of soil acidity amelioration by surface liming on no-till corn, soybean, and wheat root growth and yield. European Journal of Agronomy, 2008,28(1):57-64.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.05.002
[27] 周楠 . 铝胁迫下油菜根系分泌物的分泌特性及其对根际环境的影响[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2010.
ZHOU N . Rape (Brassica napus L.) root exudates characteristics and effects on rhizosphere soil under aluminum stress[D]. Jinhua: Zhejiang Normal University, 2010. (in Chinese)
[28] 王光火, 朱祖祥 . pH对土壤吸持磷酸根的影响及其原因. 土壤学报, 1991,28(l):1-6.
WANG G H, ZHU Z X . The effect of pH on phosphate adsorption in soils and its possible mechanism. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1991,28(l):1-6. (in Chinese)
[29] 岳龙凯 . 长期施肥及不同下红壤钾素有效性研究[D]. 北京: 中囯农业科学院, 2014.
YUE L K . Potassium availability of red soil with different pH under long-term fertilizations[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2014. (in Chinese)
[30] CURTIN, D SMILLIE G W . Effects of liming on soil chemical characteristics and grass growth in laboratory and long-term field amended soils. Plant and Soil, 1986,95(1):15-22.
doi: 10.1007/BF02378848
[31] JASKULSKA I, JASKULAKI D, KOBIERSKI M . Effect of liming on the change of some agrochemical soil properties in a long-term fertilization experiment. Plant Soil and Environment, 2014,60(4):146-150.
doi: 10.17221/PSE
[32] VALENTINUZZI F, MIMMO T, CESCO S, AL MAMUN S, SANTNER J, HOEFER C, OBURGER E, ROBINSON B, LEHTO N . The effect of lime on the rhizospheric processes and elemental uptake of white lupin. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2015,118:85-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.06.010
[33] BACKMAN J S K, HERMANSSON A, TEBBE C C . Liming in-duces growth of a diverse flora of ammonia-oxidising bacteria in acid spruce forest soil as determined by SSCP and DGGE. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2003,35(10):1337-1347.
doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00213-X
[34] 胡敏, 向永生, 鲁剑巍 . 石灰用量对酸性土壤酸度及大麦幼苗生长的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(20):3896-3903.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.20.004
HU M, XIANG Y S, LU J W . Effects of lime application rates on soil acidity and barley seeding growth in acidic soils. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(20):3896-3903. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.20.004
[1] JIN YuTing,LIU YunFeng,HU HongXiang,MU Jing,GAO MengYao,LI XianFan,XUE ZhongJun,GONG JingJing. Effects of Continuous Straw Returning with Chemical Fertilizer on Annual Runoff Loss of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Rice-Rape Rotation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1937-1951.
[2] XIAO LiuJun,LIU LeiLei,QIU XiaoLei,TANG Liang,CAO WeiXing,ZHU Yan,LIU Bing. Testing the Responses of Low Temperature Stress Routine to Low Temperature Stress at Jointing and Booting in Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(3): 504-521.
[3] DONG JianXin,SONG WenJing,CONG Ping,LI YuYi,PANG HuanCheng,ZHENG XueBo,WANG Yi,WANG Jing,KUANG Shuai,XU YanLi. Improving Farmland Soil Physical Properties by Rotary Tillage Combined with High Amount of Granulated Straw [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2789-2803.
[4] ZHAO Peng,LIU Ming,JIN Rong,CHEN XiaoGuang,ZHANG AiJun,TANG ZhongHou,WEI Meng. Effects of Long-Term Application of Organic Fertilizer on Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation and Distribution of Sweetpotato in Fluvo- Aquic Soil Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(10): 2142-2153.
[5] REN Tao,GUO LiXuan,ZHANG LiMei,YANG XuKun,LIAO ShiPeng,ZHANG YangYang,LI XiaoKun,CONG RiHuan,LU JianWei. Soil Nutrient Status of Oilseed Rape Cultivated Soil in Typical Winter Oilseed Rape Production Regions in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1606-1616.
[6] YaLin LI,XuBo ZHANG,FengLing REN,Nan SUN,Meng XU,MingGang XU. A Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Fertilization Impact on Soil Dissolved Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Across Chinese Cropland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(6): 1224-1233.
[7] ZHAO WeiSong,GUO QingGang,LI SheZeng,WANG PeiPei,LU XiuYun,SU ZhenHe,ZHANG XiaoYun,MA Ping. Effect of Wilt-Resistant and Wilt-Susceptible Cotton on Soil Bacterial Community Structure at Flowering and Boll Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(5): 942-954.
[8] LI JingYu,LI Qian,WU XuePing,WU HuiJun,SONG XiaoJun,ZHANG YongQing,LIU XiaoTong,DING WeiTing,ZHANG MengNi,ZHENG FengJun. Regional Variation in the Effects of No-Till on Soil Water Retention and Organic Carbon Pool [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(18): 3729-3740.
[9] WANG Li,WANG ZhaoHui,GUO ZiKang,TAO ZhenKui,ZHENG MingJun,HUANG Ning,GAO ZhiYuan,ZHANG XinXin,HUANG TingMiao. Differences of Main Nutrient Concentration in Wheat Grain Between Typical Locations of the Loess Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(17): 3527-3540.
[10] ZHU Yan,TANG Liang,LIU LeiLei,LIU Bing,ZHANG XiaoHu,QIU XiaoLei,TIAN YongChao,CAO WeiXing. Research Progress on the Crop Growth Model CropGrow [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(16): 3235-3256.
[11] LI Da,FANG HuaJun,WANG Di,XU LiJun,TANG XueJuan,XIN XiaoPing,NIE YingYing,Wuren qiqige. Coupling Mechanism of Herbage-Water-Nitrogen Fertilizer in Abandoned Farmland in Meadow Steppe [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2691-2702.
[12] YanHua CHEN,Le WANG,ShuXiang ZHANG,Ning GUO,ChangBao MA,ChunHua LI,MingGang XU,GuoYuan ZOU. Quality Change of Cinnamon Soil Cultivated Land and Its Effect on Soil Productivity [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(24): 4540-4554.
[13] HOU JianWei,XING CunFang,LU ZhiHong,CHEN Fen,YU Gao. Effects of the Different Crop Straw Biochars on Soil Bacterial Community of Yellow Soil in Guizhou [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(23): 4485-4495.
[14] REN FengLing, ZHANG XuBo, SUN Nan, XU MingGang, LIU KaiLou. A Meta-Analysis of Manure Application Impact on Soil Microbial Biomass Across China’s Croplands [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(1): 119-128.
[15] GAO ShengChao, GUAN DaWei, MA MingChao, ZHANG Wei, LI Jun, SHEN DeLong. Effects of Fertilization on Bacterial Community Under the Condition of Continuous Soybean Monoculture in Black Soil in Northeast China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(7): 1271-1281.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!