Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (13): 2592-2599.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.13.014

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of the Quality of Rectangular Bale Alfalfa Silage

SUN JuanJuan1, WANG GuoLiang2, A LaMuSi1, ZHAO JinMei1, BAI ChunSheng3   

  1. 1Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot 010010; 2Shandong Institute of Agriculture Sustainable Development, Jinan 250100; 3Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866
  • Received:2017-12-13 Online:2018-07-01 Published:2018-07-01

Abstract: 【Objective】 Rectangular bale silage is one pattern of alfalfa silage, which has a greater flexibility with transport and feeding. The technique of big-bale silage is, however, prone to locally spoilage in the face or in the core, because the plastic bag is easily broken. Evaluation to the bale silage quality would provide a theory basis for choosing the alfalfa silage pattern and its application in feeding. 【Method】 Non-spoilage alfalfa silage samples were taken from rectangular bales which the plastic bag were broken or not broken, from upper layer, middle layer and lower layer. Microbial colony numbers, nutrient composition and fermentation quality were compared. Two evaluation systems of V-Score and Kariser were used to evaluate alfalfa bale silage fermentation quality. 【Result】 The dry matter (DM) content of alfalfa bale silage was 43.86%-45.47%, crude protein (CP) was above 21%, natural detergent fiber (NDF) was 35.87%-37.42%, acid detergent fiber (ADF) was 30.68%-31.79%, Ash was 8.37%-8.50%, and water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) was 0.46%-0.53%. The DM of the sample from alfalfa bale silage which plastic bag were broken (BS) were significantly lower than that of sample from alfalfa bale silage which plastic bag were not broken (NBS). The chemical composition were not different from each other. The pH ranged from 4.36 to 4.72, and LA, AA, PA, BA content was 6.12%-7.04%, 2.41%-3.21%, 0.18%-0.20% and 0.67%-0.89%, respectively. AN/TN was 5.33%-5.79%. pH and AA from BS silage were higher than those from NBS silage. Mold and yeast counts of all sample were lower than 104cfu/FM. The mark of V-Score evaluation was average and the mark of Kaiser evaluation was three. 【Conclusion】 Rectangular bale silage is an good alfalfa silage pattern, and has a good fermentation quality. After removing the visible mold silage, the silage from bale which plastic bags were broken could be used as the silage with same quality of silage from bale which plastic bag were not broken.

Key words: rectangular bale silage, alfalfa, fermentation quality, V-Score evaluation, Kaiser evaluation

[1]    玉柱, 孙启忠. 饲草青贮技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2011.
YU Z, SUN Q Z. Forage Silage Technology. Beijing: China Agriculture University Press, 2011. (in Chinese)
[2]    ROTZ C A. Economics of alternative silage systems//Research summaries. U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI. 1996.
[3]    HAN K J, COLLINS M, VANZANT E S, DOUGHERTY C T. Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage. Crop Science, 2004, 44(3): 914-919.
[4]    BORREANI G, TABACCO E. The effect of a Baler Chopping System on fermentation and losses of wrapped big bales of alfalfa. Agronomy Journal, 2006, 98(98): 1-7.
[5]    TORUK F, GONULOL E. Effects of particle length on alfalfa baled silage quality and color under different storage conditions. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 2011, 17(4): 451-455.
[6]    BORREANI G, BISAGLIA C, TABACCO E. Effects of a new- concept wrapping system on alfalfa round-bale silage. Transactions of the Asabe, 2007, 50(50): 781-787.
[7]    BRODERICK G A, KANG J H. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science, 1980, 63(1): 64-75.
[8]    张慧杰. 饲草青贮微生物生物菌群动态变化与乳酸菌的鉴定筛选[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2011.
ZhANG H J. The dynamic changes of microbial flora in forage silage and identification and screening of lactic acid bacteria species isolated from forage silage[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. 2011. (in Chinese)
[9]    张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007.
ZhANG L Y. Feed Analysis and Feed Quality Testing Technology. Beijing: China Agriculture University Press, 2007.(in Chinese)
[10]   VAN SOEST P J, ROBERTSON J B, LEWIS B A. Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74: 3583-3597
[11]   OWENS V N, ALBRECHT K A, MUCK R E, DUKE S H. Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates. Crop Science, 1999. 39(6): 1873-1880.
[12]   The Evaluation Council of Self-Feed Quality. The Evaluation Manual of Crude Feed. Tokyo: The Association of Grassland and Livestock Products in Japan, 2001: 82-87.
[13]   KAISER E, WEI K. A new system for the evaluation of the fermentation quality of silages//Park R S, Stronge M D. Proceeding of the XIV International Silage Conference, a Satellite Workshop of the XXth International Grassland Congress [C]. Belfast, Northern Ireland. 2005: 275.
[14]   ALAN G, KAISER J. Successful Silage. Orange: NSW Department of Primary Industries, 2004.
[15]   CIOTTI A, CANALE A, VALENTE M, PEIRETTI P G. Treatment effects with lactic acid bacteria on lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) bale silage. Rivista Di Agronomia, 1997. 31(1 suppl): 287-290.
[16]   HUHNKE R, MUCK R, PAYTON M. Round bale silage storage losses of ryegrass and legume-grass forages. Applied Engineering In Agriculture, 1997. 13(4): 451-457.
[17]   JONSSON A, LINDBERG H, SUNDAS S, LINGVALL P, LINDGREN S. Effect of additives on the quality of big-bale silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1990. 31(1): 139-155.
[18]   WHITER A, KUNG L. The effect of a dry or liquid application of Lactobacillus plantarum MTD1 on the fermentation of alfalfa silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001. 84(10): 2195.
[19]   COLOMBARI G, BORREANI G, CROVETTO G. Comparison of lucerne silage and ventilated hay in maize silage-based rations for dairy cows for the production of milk destined for Grana cheese. Grass and Forage Science, 1999. 54(2): 184-194.
[20]   BORREANI G, TABACCO E. New oxygen barrier stretch film enhances quality of alfalfa wrapped silage. Agronomy Journal, 2008. 100(100): 942-948.
[21]   DICOSTANZO A, JOHNSTON L, WINDEL H, MURPHY M. A review of the effects of molds and mycotoxins in rumiants. Professional Animal.Scientist, 1995: 12: 138-150.
[22]   SCHROEDER J. Check Corn Silage for Spoilage. 2010; Available from: http: //www.ag.ndsu.edu/news/newsreleases/2010/april-12-2010/ check-corn-silage-for-spoilage
[23]   郭旭生, 丁武蓉, 玉柱. 青贮饲料发酵品质评定体系及其新进展. 中国草地学报, 2008, 30(4): 100-106.
GUO X S, DING W R, YU Z. The evaluation system of fermentation quality of ensiled forage and its improvement. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2008, 30(4): 100-106. (in Chinese)
[24]   郭旭生. 青贮过程中苜蓿蛋白的降解特性及化学添加剂对其影响[D]. 中国农业大学, 2007.
GUO X S. Changes in the distribution of N during ensilage of alfalfa treated with different additives[D]. Beijing: China Agriculture University, 2007. (in Chinese)
[25]   葛剑, 杨翠军, 杨志敏, 白雪梅, 赵海香, 刘贵河. 紫花苜蓿和裸燕麦混贮发酵品质和营养成分分析. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4): 104-113.
GE J, YANG C J, YANG Z M, BAI X M, ZHAO H X, LIU G H. Quality of mixed naked oats (Avena nuda) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(4): 104-113. (in Chinese
[1] ZONG Cheng, WU JinXin, ZHU JiuGang, DONG ZhiHao, LI JunFeng, SHAO Tao, LIU QinHua. Effects of Additives on the Fermentation Quality of Agricultural By-Products and Wheat Straw Mixed Silage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 1037-1046.
[2] NUERHATI·Silafuer ,WUSIMAN·Yimiti . Effects of Amino Acid By-Products on Fermentation Quality and Digestibility of White Sorghum Silage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4065-4074.
[3] SU Qian,DU WenXuan,MA Lin,XIA YaYing,LI Xue,QI Zhi,PANG YongZhen. Cloning and Functional Analyses of MsCIPK2 in Medicago sativa [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(19): 3697-3709.
[4] ZHANG YunXiu,JIANG Xu,WEI ChunXue,JIANG XueQian,LU DongYu,LONG RuiCai,YANG QingChuan,WANG Zhen,KANG JunMei. The Functional Analysis of High Mobility Group MsHMG-Y Involved in Flowering Regulation in Medicago sativa L. [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3082-3092.
[5] MA Lin,WEN HongYu,WANG XueMin,GAO HongWen,PANG YongZhen. Cloning and Function Analysis of MsMAX2 Gene in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(19): 4061-4069.
[6] ZeMin LI,Chen ZHANG,ChongYu ZHANG,GuiGuo ZHANG. The Relationship Between Nutrients and Biological Yield of Different Varieties of Alfalfa [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(6): 1269-1277.
[7] KANG JunMei,ZHANG QiaoYan,JIANG Xu,WANG Zhen,ZHANG TieJun,LONG RuiCai,CUI HuiTing,YANG QingChuan. Cloning MsSQE1 from Alfalfa and Functional Analysis in Saponin Synthesis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(2): 247-260.
[8] JIANG Xu,CUI HuiTing,WANG Zhen,ZHANG TieJun,LONG RuiCai,YANG QingChuan,KANG JunMei. Cloning and Function Analysis of MsNST in Lignin and Cellulose Biosynthesis Pathway from Alfalfa [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(18): 3818-3832.
[9] LIU JiaoJiao,WANG XueMin,MA Lin,CUI MiaoMiao,CAO XiaoYu,ZHAO Wei. Isolation, Identification, and Response to Abiotic Stress of MsWRKY42 Gene from Medicago sativa L. [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(17): 3455-3466.
[10] GONG Hao,YANG Liu,LI DanDan,LIU GuoFu,XIAO ZhiXin,WU QingYing,CUI GuoWen. Response of Alfalfa Production and Quality to Fertilization and Cutting Frequency and Benefit Analysis in Mollisol Agricultural Area in Cold Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2657-2667.
[11] XIAO ZhiXin,WANG Yang,LIU GuoFu,GONG Hao,LI DanDan,GONG Lin,BAI ZhenJian,CUI GuoWen. Effects of Fertilizing Time in Early Spring on Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Production Performance and Nutritional Quality in Mollisol Area in Cold Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(13): 2668-2677.
[12] XiaoDong LI,YiShun SHANG,ShiGe LI,GuangJi CHEN,ChengJiang PEI,Fang SUN,XianQin XIONG. The Mechanism of Ectopic Expression of Brassica juncea Multidrug and Toxic Compound Extrusion (BjMATE) to Enhance the Resistance to Acid and Aluminum Stress in Alfalfa [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 18-28.
[13] SUN YanMei,ZHANG QianBing,MIAO XiaoRong,LIU JunYing,YU Lei,MA ChunHui. Effects of Phosphorus-Solubilizing Bacteria and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Production Performance and Root Biomass of Alfalfa [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(13): 2230-2242.
[14] SUN JuanJuan, A LaMuSi, ZHAO JinMei, XUE YanLin, YU LinQing, YU Zhu, ZHANG YingJun. Analysis of Amino Acid Composition and Six Native Alfalfa Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(13): 2359-2367.
[15] ZHANG CuiMei, SHI ShangLi, WU Fang. Effects of Drought Stress on Root and Physiological Responses of Different Drought-Tolerant Alfalfa Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(5): 868-882.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!