Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (5): 1037-1046.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.05.015

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCE·RESOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles    

Effects of Additives on the Fermentation Quality of Agricultural By-Products and Wheat Straw Mixed Silage

ZONG Cheng(),WU JinXin,ZHU JiuGang,DONG ZhiHao,LI JunFeng,SHAO Tao,LIU QinHua()   

  1. College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095
  • Received:2020-08-20 Accepted:2022-01-04 Online:2022-03-01 Published:2022-03-08
  • Contact: QinHua LIU E-mail:zongchengnj@163.com;liuqinhua@njau.edu.cn

Abstract:

【Objective】With the continuous development of food industry and processing industry, a large number of agricultural by-products were produced, including watermelon rind, broad bean pod and beer lees, which caused serious environmental pollution. In order to improve the feeding degree of agricultural by-products and wheat straw and to reduce environmental pressure, in this study, the effects of additives on the fermentation quality of agricultural by-products (watermelon rind, broad bean pod and beer lees) mixed with wheat straw were investigated.【Method】The mixture of agricultural by-products (watermelon rind﹕broad bean pod﹕beer lees = 1﹕3﹕4) and wheat straw, as raw materials, were mixed in ratios at fresh weight of 100%﹕0 (MW), 25%﹕75% (X25), 50%﹕50% (X50) and 25%﹕75% (X75), and the mixed silages were treated with additives: 1×106 cfu•g-1Lactobacillus buchneri (B), 0.2% FW cellulase (C), and 1×106 cfu•g-1Lactobacillus rhamnosus (R), and without additives (CON) as the control. The 200 g of raw materials treated with different additives were put into 250 mL polyethylene plastic bottles. After ensiling for 60 days at room temperature, the silos were opened to analyze the fermentation quality and nutrient composition. The treated silages and raw materials were filtered by two layers of gauze and qualitative filter paper, and the extract was used for measuring the pH value. The raw materials and silage were dried to a constant weight and the dry matter (DM) was measured. The crude protein (CP) was determined by Kjeldahl nitrogen determination method. The contents of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were determined by the method of Van’s fiber determination. The water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC) content was determined via the modified phenol-sulfuric acid method. The microorganisms were cultured and counted in the culture medium respectively. The organic acids were analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography. The ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) content was determined by the phenol-hypochlorite reaction method. 【Result】 Compared with MW-treated silage, NH3-N content was notably decreased in X25-treated silage (P<0.05); pH and NH3-N content were decreased in X50-treated silage, significantly (P<0.05); pH and NH3-N content were notably decreased and the ratio of lactic acid to acetic acid (LA/AA) was notably increased in X75-treated silage, respectively (P<0.05). In addition, compared with the MW-treated silage, the butyric acid content was reduced in X25-, X50- and X75-treated silage, notably (P<0.05). In MW-treated silage, compared with the control, adding C significantly decreased the pH and NH3-N content (P<0.05), and increased the lactic acid (LA) content and LA/AA (P<0.05). In X25-treated silage, compared with the control, adding C decreased the pH and increased the LA content, significantly (P<0.05); adding B decreased the NH3-N content, notably (P<0.05). In X75-treated silage, compared with the control, adding C decreased the pH and increased the lactic acid content, significantly (P<0.05). As the increase of wheat straw mixing ratio, the contents of DM, NDF and ADF was increased, significantly (P<0.05). In contrast, the CP content was decreased, significantly (P<0.05). Compared with MW-treated silage, X25-, X50- and X75-treated silage increased WSC content, notably (P<0.05). In X25-treated silage, compared with the control, the addition of C significantly reduced the contents of NDF and ADF (P<0.05). In X50-treated silage, the addition of B and C significantly reduced the NDF content (P<0.05). In X75-treated silage, compared with the control, the addition of B, C and R reduced the contents of NDF and ADF, notably (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】The fermentation quality of mixed agricultural by-products (watermelon skin﹕broad bean pod﹕beer bad = 1﹕3﹕4) was poor. The mixed silage of agricultural by-products and wheat straw could improve the fermentation quality, and the best mixture ratios of wheat straw and agricultural by-products (watermelon rind﹕broad bean pod﹕beer lees = 1﹕3﹕4) were 50%﹕50% and 75%﹕25%. In terms of nutrition quality, X25 and X50 were the best mixture ratios of wheat straw and agricultural by-products (watermelon rind﹕broad bean pod﹕beer lees = 1﹕3﹕4) were 25%﹕75% and 50%﹕50%. Comprehensively considered the fermentation quality and nutritive value, the optimum mixing ratio of agricultural by-products (watermelon rind﹕broad bean pod﹕beer lees = 1﹕3﹕4) and wheat straw was 50%﹕50%, and the addition of cellulose could further enhance the fermentation quality and improve the nutritional composition.

Key words: agricultural by-products, wheat straw, mixed silage, additives, fermentation quality

Table 1

Chemical and microbial composition of different mixing ratios of wheat straw and agricultural by-products prior to ensiling"

项目
Items
MW X25 X50 X75 标准误
Standard error
显著性
Significance
干物质 Dry matter (g•kg-1 FW) 194d 358c 527b 680a 55.0 <0.001
粗蛋白 Crude protein (g•kg-1 DM) 239a 172b 111c 70.6d 18.45 <0.001
中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (g•kg-1 DM) 333c 367b 378b 417a 9.1 <0.001
酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (g•kg-1 DM) 132c 151b 156b 168a 3.9 <0.001
水溶性碳水化合物 Water soluble carbohydrates (g•kg-1 DM) 67.1b 60.7b 66.0b 75.2a 0.16 <0.001
缓冲能 Buffer capacity (mEq•kg-1 DM) 42.0a 27.3b 24.9b 13.7c 3.07 <0.001
乳酸菌 Lactic acid bacteria (lg cfu•g-1 FW) 6.06 6.17 6.08 6.05 0.023 0.262
好氧性细菌 Aerobic bacteria (lg cfu•g-1 FW) 7.79ab 8.13a 7.87ab 7.42b 0.094 0.027
酵母菌 Yeast (lg cfu•g-1 FW) 7.27 7.21 7.10 7.23 0.053 0.752

Table 2

Effects of mixing ratio and additives on fermentation quality and microbial composition of silage"

项目
Items
pH 乳酸
LA
(g•kg-1 DM)
乙酸
AA
(g•kg-1 DM)
丙酸
PA
(g•kg-1 DM)
丁酸
BA
(g•kg-1 DM)
乳酸与
乙酸比
LA/AA
氨态氮
NH3-N
(g•kg-1 N)
乳酸菌
Lactic acid bacteria
(lg cfu•g-1 FW)
好氧性细菌
Aerobic bacteria
(lg cfu•g-1 FW)
酵母
Yeast
(lg cfu•g-1 FW)
MW CON 4.92b 16.6b 62.1b ND 21.0b 0.27b 174b 7.08b 4.97 <2.00
B 5.18a 3.06c 57.5bc ND 25.0b 0.05c 223a 7.72a 5.04 <2.00
C 4.50c 56.1a 125a ND 51.1a 0.45a 123c 7.79a 5.16 <2.00
R 5.18a 2.73c 48.4c ND 44.7a 0.06c 236a 7.60a 5.24 <2.00
平均值 Mean 4.95A 19.6 73.3A ND 35.5A 0.21B 189A 7.55B 5.10 /
X25 CON 4.59a 11.7b 52.6c ND ND 0.22 96.8a 7.60b 5.13 <2.00
B 4.61a 13.5b 61.4bc ND ND 0.22 79.3ab 8.25a 5.28 <2.00
C 4.39b 20.8a 84.3a ND ND 0.25 84.4ab 7.99ab 5.27 <2.00
R 4.62a 15.2ab 72.8ab ND ND 0.21 68.6b 7.82ab 4.98 <2.00
平均值 Mean 4.55AB 15.3 67.8A ND NDB 0.23B 82.3B 7.92A 5.17 /
X50 CON 4.55a 25.1a 50.8 ND ND 0.49a 68.5a 7.36 5.10 <2.00
B 4.54a 15.9c 54.8 ND ND 0.29b 32.2c 7.24 5.20 <2.00
C 4.20b 21.2ab 55.5 ND ND 0.38b 44.3bc 7.64 5.17 <2.00
R 4.56a 18.6bc 49.8 ND ND 0.37b 66.3ab 7.29 5.12 <2.00
平均值 Mean 4.46B 20.2 52.7AB ND NDB 0.38B 52.8B 7.38B 5.15 /
X75 CON 4.47a 18.3 30.8 ND ND 0.62 58.9a 7.74 5.40a <2.00
B 4.45a 17.7 27.5 ND ND 0.64 58.9a 7.70 4.95c <2.00
C 4.19b 21.5 25.1 ND ND 0.86 38.3b 7.46 5.32ab <2.00
R 4.38a 18.6 23.2 ND ND 0.80 49.8ab 7.42 5.16b <2.00
平均值 Mean 4.37B 19.0 26.7B ND NDB 0.73A 51.5B 7.58B 5.21 /
标准误 Standard error 0.041 1.67 3.60 / 2.46 0.030 9.04 0.047 0.038 /
显著性 Significance
混合比例 Mixture ratio ** ** ** NS ** ** ** ** NS NS
添加剂 Additives ** ** ** NS ** ** ** ** NS NS
交互作用 Interaction ** ** ** NS ** ** ** ** ** NS

Table 3

Effects of mixing ratio and additives on nutrient composition of silage"

项目
Items
干物质
DM (g• kg-1 FW)
粗蛋白
CP (g• kg-1 DM)
中性洗涤纤维
NDF (g• kg-1 DM)
酸性洗涤纤维
ADF (g• kg-1 DM)
水溶性碳水化合物
WSC (g• kg-1 DM)
MW CON 194a 248 318b 129c 5.17a
B 158b 245 353a 153a 3.36b
C 169ab 241 313b 133bc 3.22b
R 172ab 233 356a 146ab 3.74b
平均值 Mean 173D 242A 335C 140B 3.87B
X25 CON 350 145 362a 155a 9.34ab
B 358 148 354ab 142ab 11.3ab
C 335 156 333b 133b 14.9a
R 356 145 369a 154a 8.19b
平均值 Mean 350C 149B 355B 146AB 10.9B
X50 CON 514 120 374a 157 16.3b
B 508 130 334b 150 22.0ab
C 490 126 323b 147 26.9a
R 521 115 390a 162 24.3a
平均值 Mean 508B 123C 355B 152AB 22.4A
X75 CON 657 78.5 431a 176a 18.5b
B 665 83.3 379b 152b 23.2ab
C 679 84.1 353b 139b 28.8a
R 671 79.3 354b 142b 23.4ab
平均值 Mean 668A 81.3D 379A 154A 23.5A
标准误 Standard error 26.9 8.72 4.37 1.88 2.60
显著性 Significance
混合比例 Mixture ratio ** ** ** ** **
添加剂 Additives NS NS ** ** **
交互作用 Interaction NS NS ** ** **
[1] 赵金鹏, 赵杰, 李君风, 董志浩, 陈雷, 白云峰, 贾玉山, 邵涛. 不同添加剂对水稻秸秆青贮发酵品质和结构性碳水化合物组分的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2019, 42(1):152-159.
ZHAO J P, ZHAO J, LI J F, DONG Z H, CHEN L, BAI Y F, JIA Y S, SHAO T. Effect of different additives on fermentation quality and structural carbohydrates compositions of rice straw silage. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2019, 42(1):152-159. (in Chinese)
[2] 付锦涛, 王学凯, 倪奎奎, 杨富裕. 添加乳酸菌和糖蜜对全株构树和稻草混合青贮的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4):121-128.
FU J T, WANG X K, NI K K, YANG F Y. The effects of adding lactic acid bacteria and molasses on fermentation of broussonetia papyrifera and rice straw mixed silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(4):121-128. (in Chinese)
[3] 杨瑞萍, 杨瑞玲, 张志军, 郭同军. 四类非常规饲料的利用现状及研究进展. 草食家畜, 2015(5):14-19.
YANG R P, YANG R L, ZHANG Z J, GUO T J. Utilization status and research progress of four non-conventional feed. Grass-Feeding Livestock, 2015(5):14-19. (in Chinese)
[4] 陈鑫珠, 庄益芬, 张文昌, 廖惠珍, 王秋芳, 徐燕飞, 杨腾华. 添加剂和混合比例对水葫芦玉米秸秆混合青贮品质的影响. 家畜生态学报, 2010, 31(5):47-52.
CHEN X Z, ZHUANG Y F, ZHANG W C, LIAO H Z, WANG Q F, XU Y F, YANG T H. Effect of additives and mixed ratio on quality of water hyacinth and maize straw mixed silages. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 2010, 31(5):47-52. (in Chinese)
[5] 任海伟, 赵拓, 李金平, 李雪雁, 徐娜, 王永刚, 王晓力, 高晓航. 玉米秸秆与废弃白菜的混贮品质及乳酸菌多样性研究. 草业学报, 2016, 25(1):197-206.
REN H W, ZHAO T, LI J P, LI X Y, XU N, WANG Y G, WANG X L, GAO X H. Quality and lactic acid bacteria of mixed corn stalk and cabbage waste silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(1):197-206. (in Chinese)
[6] WANG J, CHEN L, YUAN X J, GUO G, LI J F, BAI Y F, SHAO T. Effects of molasses on the fermentation characteristics of mixed silage prepared with rice straw, local vegetable by-products and alfalfa in Southeast China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2017(3), 16:664-670.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61473-9
[7] 邹荣. 西瓜皮果胶提取及其性质的研究[D]. 华南理工大学, 2014.
ZOU R. Study on extraction and characterization of watermelon rind pectin[D]. South China University of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese)
[8] WANG S, ZHAO J, YU C, LI J, TAO X, CHEN S, SHAO T. Nutritional evaluation of wet brewers’ grains as substitute for common vetch in ensiled total mixed ration. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2020, 19(1), 1015-1025.
doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2020.1810141
[9] 赵士萍, 周敏, 蒋林树. 青贮饲料添加剂的研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(20):6-10.
ZHAO S P, ZHOU M, JIANG L S. Research progress of silage additive. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(20):6-10. (in Chinese)
[10] 李雁冰, 玉柱, 孙娟娟. 不同乳酸菌添加剂对青贮黑麦草和青贮玉米微生物群集的影响. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2):387-393.
LI Y B, YU Z, SUN J J. Microbial communities of whole crop corn and wilted Italian ryegrass silage inoculated with and without different lactic acid bacteria inoculants. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(2):387-393. (in Chinese)
[11] 刘玉婷, 吴明阳, 靳艳玲, 沈维亮, 方扬, 赵海. 鼠李糖乳杆菌利用甘薯废渣发酵产乳酸的研究. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(9):1767-1777.
LIU Y T, WU M Y, JIN Y L, SHEN W L, FANG Y, ZHAO H. Lactic acid fermentation by Lactobacillus rhamnosus from sweet potato residue. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(9):1767-1777. (in Chinese)
[12] 刘秦华, 李湘玉, 丁良, 吴琳, 张建国, 邵涛. 添加剂对象草青贮发酵品质、α-生育酚和β-胡萝卜素的影响. 草地学报, 2015, 23(6):1317-1322.
LIU Q H, LI X Y, DING L, WU L, ZHANG J G, SHAO T. Effects of additives on the fermentation quality, α-tocopherol and β-carotene of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) Silage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(6):1317-1322. (in Chinese)
[13] 赵庆杰, 原现军, 郭刚, 闻爱友, 巴桑, 王奇, 沈振西, 余成群, 邵涛. 添加糖蜜和乳酸菌制剂对西藏青稞秸秆和多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质的影响. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4):100-106.
ZHAO Q J, YUAN X J, GUO G, WEN A Y, BA S, WANG Q, SHEN Z X, YU C Q, SHAO T. Effect of adding an inoculant and molasses on fermentation quality of mixed silage of hull-less barley straw and perennial ryegrass in Tibet. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4):100-106. (in Chinese)
[14] YUAN X J, GUO G, WEN A Y, DESTA S T, WANG J, WANG Y, SHAO T. The effect of different additives on the fermentation quality, in vitro digestibility and aerobic stability of a total mixed ration silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2015, 207:41-50.
doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.06.001
[15] 丁良, 原现军, 闻爱友, 王坚, 郭刚, 李君风, 王思然, 白晰, 邵涛. 添加剂对西藏啤酒糟全混合日粮青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(7):112-120.
DING L, YUAN X J, WEN A Y, WANG J, GUO G, LI J F, WANG S R, BAI X, SHAO T. Effects of additives on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of total mixedration silage containing wet brewers’ grains in Tibet. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(7):112-120. (in Chinese)
[16] CHEN L, GUO G, YU C, ZHANG J, SHIMOJO M, SHAO T. The effects of replacement of whole-plant corn with oat and common vetch on the fermentation quality, chemical composition and aerobic stability of total mixed ration silage in Tibet. Animal Science Journal, 2015, 86(1):69-76.
doi: 10.1111/asj.2015.86.issue-1
[17] WANG C, NISHINO N. Effects of storage temperature and ensiling period on fermentation products, aerobic stability and microbial communities of total mixed ration silage. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2013, 114(6):1687-1695.
doi: 10.1111/jam.12200
[18] 刘秦华, 张建国, 卢小良. 乳酸菌添加剂对王草青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响. 草业学报, 2009, 18(4):131-137.
LIU Q H, ZHANG J G, LU X L. The effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculation on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of king grass silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(4):131-137. (in Chinese)
[19] ZHAO J, DONG ZH, LI JF, CHEN L, BAI YF, JIA YS, SHAO T. Ensiling as pretreatment of rice straw: The effect of hemicellulase and Lactobacillus plantarum on hemicellulose degradation and cellulose conversion. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 266:158-165.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.058
[20] BRODERICK G A, KANG J H. Automated simultaneous determination o fammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science, 1980, 63(1):64-75.
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8
[21] SHAO T, ZHANG Z X, SHIMOJO M, WANG T, MASUDA Y. Comparison of fermentation characteristics of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam) and Guineagrass (Panicum maximum Jacq) during the early stage of ensiling. Asian-australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2005, 18(12):1727-1734.
doi: 10.5713/ajas.2005.1727
[22] 郭旭生, 丁武蓉, 玉柱. 青贮饲料发酵品质评定体系及其新进展. 中国草地学报, 2008, 30(4):100-106.
GUO X S, DING W R, YU Z. The evaluation system of fermentation quality of ensiled forage and its improvement. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2008, 30(4):100-106. (in Chinese)
[23] 闫艳红, 李君临, 郭旭生, 玉柱, 张新全, 孙娟娟, 罗燕. 多花黑麦草与大豆秸秆混合青贮发酵品质的研究. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4):94-99.
YAN Y H, LI J L, GUO X S, YU Z, ZHANG Q X, SUN J J, LUO Y. A study on fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass and soybean straw mixed silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4):94-99. (in Chinese)
[24] 陈鹏飞, 白史且, 杨富裕, 干友民. 添加剂和水分对光叶紫花苕青贮品质的影响. 草业学报, 2013, 22(2):80-86.
CHEN P F, BAI S Q, YANG F Y, GAN Y M. Effects of additive and moisture content on fermentation quality of smooth vetch silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(2):80-86. (in Chinese)
[25] WU P, LI L, JIANG J, SUN Y, YUAN Z, FENG X, GUO Y. Effects of fermentative and non-fermentative additives on silage quality and anaerobic digestion performance of Pennisetum purpureum. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 297:122425.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122425
[26] 梁小玉, 季杨, 易军, 付茂忠, 胡远彬. 混合比例和添加剂对菊苣与青贮玉米混合青贮品质的影响. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2):173-181.
LIANG X Y, JI Y, YI J, FU M Z, HU Y B. Effects of mixing ratio and additives on ensilage efficiency of mixed chicory and silage maize. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(2):173-181. (in Chinese)
[27] 王奇, 余成群, 李志华, 赵庆杰, 下条雅敬, 邵涛. 添加酶和乳酸菌制剂对西藏苇状羊茅和箭筈豌豆混合青贮发酵品质的影响. 草业学报, 2012, 21(4):186-191.
WANG Q, YU C Q, LI Z H, ZHAO Q J, SHIMOJO M, SHAO T. Effect of adding coenzyme and lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality of mixed silages of tall fescue(Festuca arundinacea) and common vetch(Vicia sativa) in tibet. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(4):186-191. (in Chinese)
[28] 李文杨, 陈鑫珠, 刘远, 高承芳, 张晓佩, 翁伯琦. 添加剂和混合比例对杂交狼尾草苎麻混合青贮品质的影响. 家畜生态学报, 2016, 37(8):50-54+60.
LI W Y, CHEN X Z, LIU Y, GAO C F, ZHANG X P, WENG B Q. Effects of mixed ratio and additive on efficiency of mixed silage of Hybrid Pennisetum and Ramie. Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology, (in Chinese)
[29] 庄苏, 丁立人, 周建国, 王恬. 甲酸与纤维素酶和木聚糖酶对多花黑麦草与白三叶混合青贮料发酵品质的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2013, 29(1):140-146.
ZHUANG S, DING L R, ZHOU J G, WANG T. Effects of formic acid, cellulase and xylanase on fermentation quality of Lolium multiflorum and Trifolium repens mixture silage during ensiling. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 29(1):140-146. (in Chinese)
[30] LI Y, NISHINO N. Effects of inoculation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation, aerobic stability and microbial communities in whole crop corn silage. Grassland Science, 2011, 57(4):184-191.
doi: 10.1111/grs.2011.57.issue-4
[31] HU W, SCHMIDT R J, MCDONELL E E, KLINGERMAN C M, KUNG L. The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri 40788 or Lactobacillus plantarum MTD-1 on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silages ensiled at two dry matter contents. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009, 92(8):3907-3914.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1788
[32] KRISTENSEN N B, SLOTH K H, HOJBERG O, SPLIID N H, JENSEN C, THOGERSEN R. Effects of microbial inoculants on corn silage fermentation, microbial contents, aerobic stability, and milk production under field conditions. Journal of Dairy Science, 2010, 93(8):3764-3774.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3136
[33] BORREANI G, TABACCO E, SCHMIDT R J, HOLMES B J, MUCK R E. Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(5):3952-3979.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13837
[34] CHEN L, BAI S, YOU M, XIAO B, LI P, CAI Y. Effect of a low temperature tolerant lactic acid bacteria inoculant on the fermentation quality and bacterial community of oat round bale silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2020, 269:114669.
doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114669
[35] 黄晓辉, 李树成, 李东华, 王彦荣. 苦豆子和玉米秸秆的混合青贮. 草业科学, 2013, 30(10):1633-1639.
HUANG X H, LI S C, LI D H, WANG Y R. Fermentation quality and content of poisonous substances in Sophora alopecuroides and corn straw mixed silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 30(10):1633-1639. (in Chinese)
[1] NUERHATI·Silafuer ,WUSIMAN·Yimiti . Effects of Amino Acid By-Products on Fermentation Quality and Digestibility of White Sorghum Silage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4065-4074.
[2] SUN JuanJuan, WANG GuoLiang, A LaMuSi, ZHAO JinMei, BAI ChunSheng. Evaluation of the Quality of Rectangular Bale Alfalfa Silage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(13): 2592-2599.
[3] DONG Ming-hui, GU Jun-rong, CHEN Pei-feng, HAN Li-yu, QIAO Zhong-ying. Effects of Interaction of Wheat Straw Residue with Field and Nitrogen Applications on Branches and Spikelets Formation at Different Positions in Large Panicle Hybrid Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(22): 4437-4449.
[4] LIU Sha-Sha, LI Jing-Mei, SHI Bo, LIANG Ping, LI Chao. Optimization of Reaction Conditions for Cello-Oligosaccharides Production from Wheat Straw by β-Glucanase Hydrolysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(11): 2345-2352.
[5] QIN Meng-Zhen, SHEN Yi-Xin. Effects of Maturity Stage on Fermentation Quality of Whole Crop Wheat Silage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(8): 1661-1666.
[6] DI Xiu-Cai, LIU Ming, LI Zhong-Pei, XU Yang-Chun. Effect of Different Additives on Decomposition of Rice Straw [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(12): 2412-2419.
[7] WU Ji, GUO Xi-Sheng, WANG Yun-Qing, XU Zheng-Yu, LU Jian-Wei. Decomposition Characteristics of Rapeseed and Wheat Straws Under Different Rice Cultivations and Straw Mulching Models [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(16): 3351-3360.
[8] TAN De-shui,JIN Ji-yun,HUANG Shao-wen,LIU Zhao-hui,JIANG Li-hua
. Effect of Long-Term Application of K Fertilizer and Wheat Straw to Soil on Potassium Fixation Capacity of Selected Soils from Northern China
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(10): 2072-2079 .
[9] GAO Bing,LI Jun-liang,CHEN Qing,LIU Qing-hua,WANG Jing
. Study on Nitrogen Management and Irrigation Methods of Greenhouse Tomato
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(6): 2034-2042 .
[10] TONG Jian-ming. Study and Development of Animal Growth Promoting Additives from Plant and Microorganism [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(增刊): 3331-3335.
[11] ,,,,. Effect of Additives on Baled Alfalfa Silage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(7): 1464-1471 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!