Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (13): 2449-2458.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.13.001

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS •     Next Articles

QTL Mapping of Self-Compatibility, Silique and Seeds-Associated Traits in Brassica rapa

SUN Qian-qian1,2, WU Jian2, CHENG Feng2, WANG Xiao-wu2, LIANG Jian-li2, SHEN Shu-xing1

 
  

  1. 1College of Horticulture, Agricultural University of Hebei/Key Laboratory for Vegetable Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization of Hebei/Collaborative Innovation Center of Vegetable Industry in Hebei, Baoding 071000, Hebei
    2Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2016-02-01 Online:2016-07-01 Published:2016-07-01

Abstract: 【Objective】Brassica rapa is an important oil crop in the world. Higher seed yield with good quality is one of the important agronomic traits. Due to the self-incompatibility characteristic of most B. rapa, it is difficult to purify breeding materials and realize maximum yield of this plant, since the seed yield of this crop is influenced by the silique related traits, such as the number of pods, number of seed per silique. Besides, the seed quality is closely related to seed color. The aim of this research is providing an important genetic basis for breeding self-compatibility varieties or inbred lines of B. rapa and genetic modification of yield with quality in this crop.【Method】The Recombinant Inbred Lines (RILs) population derived from the cross between genotypes R-O-18 with well self-compatibility and L58 with weak self-compatibility consisting of 117 lines was used to conduct QTL analysis. Based on previous linkage map generated by 372 InDel markers, the Interval Mapping (IM) method was used to survey a total of nine traits as follows: compatible index of flowering time (CIFT), pods rate (PR), silique length (SL), silique beak length (SBL), silique length/silique width (SL/SW), silique beak length/silique length (SBL/SL), number of seed per silique (NSPS), thousand seed weight (TSW) and seed color (SC).【Result】RILs population in the 9 self-compatibility, siliques and seeds-related traits showed continuous variation and variation margin, showed normal or partial normal distribution, with typical quantitative genetic characteristics. CIFT showed an extremely significant positive correlation with PR, SL, SBL, SL/SW, NSPS, and TSW, where the correlation coefficient between CIFT and NSPS was the largest, reaching 0.8487; and several other traits in order of size (high to low): TSW, PR, SBL, SL, and SL/SW. NSPS and TSW presents a very significant positive correlation with PR, SL, SBL, SL/SW, NSPS also had a significant positive correlation with TSW (0.6477). The PR, SL and SBL, SL/SW also showed a significant positive correlation. SBL/SL showed a negative correlation and a significant positive correlation with SBL, but not correlated with other traits. A total of 12 QTL loci were detected and the major ones were located on chromosome A09, and totally 10 QTLs explained phenotypic variation of more than 10%. Two QTLs controlling CIFT were located on chromosome A09, accounting for the phenotype variation 13.1% and 16.7%, respectively. Six QTLs related to silique were located on A06, A09 and A10, respectively, explaining phenotypic variance of 13.4%-17.7%. Furthermore, four seed-associated QTLs were located on chromosome A02, A05, A06 and A09, respectively, with QTL effects varied from 7.9% to 42.1%, of which the QTL located on A09 was the major QTL for SC, as it accounted for phenotypic variance of 42.1% and it had additive effect value of 1.22. 【Conclusion】A total of 12 QTLs which control self-compatibility (2), siliques (6) and seeds-related traits (4) were detected. For the two self-compatibility QTLs, they are different with the S locus identified previously, which indicated that the two loci detected in this study may be the non-major QTLs. Additionally, one QTL of the 4 seeds-related QTLs is the major QTL of this trait.

Key words: Brassica rapa, self-compatibility, silique, seeds-associated traits, QTL

[1]    唐国永, 徐青兰, 王瑞生, 李钧, 杜德志.白菜型大黄油菜自交亲和性初步研究. 青海农林科技, 2006, 1: 8-9.
Tang G Y, Xu Q L, Wang R S, Li J, Du D Z. Primary study on self-compatibility in Hahuang rape of B.chinensis. Qinghai Scienceand TechnologyofAgriculture and Forestry, 2006, 1: 8-9. (in Chinese)
[2]    孙万仓, 范惠玲, 叶剑, 张亚宏, 刘雅利, 曾军, 王鹏.白菜型油菜自交亲和性变异分析.西北植物学报,2006,4:688-695.
Sun W C, Fan H L,Ye J, Zhang Y H, Liu Y L, Zeng J, Wang P. Variation of Brassica campestris L.self-compatibility. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2006, 4: 688-695. (in Chinese)
[3]    Bagheri H, El-Soda M, van Oorschot I, Hanhart C, Bonnema G, Jansen-van den Bosch T, Mank R, Keurentjes J J, Meng L, Wu J. Genetic analysis of morphological traits in a new, versatile, rapid-cycling Brassica campestris L. recombinantinbred line population. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2012, 3: 183.
[4]    戚存扣, 陈玉卿, 张洁夫, 高冠军, 博寿仲, 惠飞虎.白菜型油菜自交亲和性分析及自交系基础群体筛选.中国油料,1997,4:11-13.
Qi C K, Chen Y Q, Zhang J F, Gao G J, Bo S Z, Hui F H. Analysis of self-compatibility and selecting of inbred lines population in Brassica campestris L.. Oil Crops of China, 1997, 4: 11-13. (in Chinese)
[5]    罗玉秀, 杜德志. 白菜型油菜自交不亲和性状的遗传分析. 青海大学学报, 2008, 6: 6.
Luo Y X, Du D Z. Genetic analyses of self-incompatiblecharacterin Brassica campestris. Journal of Qinghai University, 2008, 6: 6.(in Chinese)
[6]    原玉香, 张晓伟, 蒋武生, 姚秋菊, 张强, 赵艳艳, 耿建峰.大白菜种皮颜色基因的QTL定位与分析. 华北农学报,2012, 27(1):74-78.
Yuan Y X, Zhang X W, Jiang W S, Yao Q J, Zhang Q, Zhao Y Y, Geng J F. QTL Mapping for seedcoat color in Chinese cabbage (Brassicacampestris L. ssp. pekinensis). Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2012, 27(1): 74-78. (in Chinese)
[7]    Schopfer C R, Nasrallah M E, Nasrallah J B. The male determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica. Science,1999, 286(5445):1697-1700.
[8]    Watanabe M, Takasaki T, Toriyama K, Yamakawa S, Isogai A, Suzuki A, Hinata K. A high degree ofhomology exists between the protein encoded by SLG and the S receptor domain encoded by SRK in self-incompatible Brassica campestris L.. Plant and Cell Physiology, 1994, 35(8): 1221-1229.
[9]    Goring D R, Glavin T L, Schafer U, Rothstein S J. An S receptor kinase gene in self-incompatibility Brassica napus has a 1bp deletion. The Plant Cell, 1993, 5: 531-539.
[10]   Nasrallah M E, Kandasamy M K, Nasrallah J B. A genetically define trans-acting locus regulatesS-locus function in Brassica. The Plant Journal, 1992, 2(4): 497-506.
[11]   Fujimoto R, Sugimura T, Nishio T. Gene conver from SLG to SRK resulting in self-compatibility inBrassica rapa. FEB Letters, 2006, 580: 425-430.
[12]   Kitashiba H, Liu P, Nishio T, Nasrallah J B, Nasrallah M E. Functional test of Brassica self-incompatibility modifiers in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(44): 18173-18178.
[13]   WATANABE M, ONO T, HATAKEYAMA K, TAKAYAMA S, ISOGAI A, HINATA K. Molecular characterization of SLG and S-related genes in a self-compatible Brassica campestris L. var. yellow sarson. Sexual plant reproduction, 1997, 10(6): 332-340.
[14]   Lim S H, Cho H, Lee J, Cho Y H, Kim B D. Identification and classification of S haplotypes in Raphanus sativusby PCR-RFLP of the S locus glycoprotein (SLG) gene and the S locus receptor kinase (SRK) gene. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2002, 104: 1253-1262 .
[15]   Robert SL, Allard S, Franklin M T, Trick M. Sequence and expression of endogenous S-locus glycoprotein genes in self-compatible Brassica napus. Molecular and General Genetics, 1994, 242: 209-216.
[16]   Lou P, Zhao J, Kim J S, Shen S, Del Carpio D P, Song X, Jin M, Vreugdenhil D, Wang X, Koornneef M. Quantitative trait loci for flowering time and morphological traits in multiple populations of Brassica campestris L.. Journal of experimental botany, 2007, 58(14):4005-4016.
[17]   Zhang L, Li S, Chen L, Yang G. Identification and mapping of a major dominant quantitative trait locus controlling seeds per silique as a single Mendelian factor in Brassica napus L.. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2012, 125(4): 695-705.
[18]   Yang P, Shu C, Chen L, Xu J, Wu J, Liu K. Identification of a major QTL for silique length and seed weight in oilseed rape(Brassica napus L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2012, 125(2): 285-296.
[19]   张凤启, 程晓辉, 刘越英, 童超波, 董彩华, 于景印, 黄军艳, 刘胜毅. 甘蓝型油菜分枝数QTL定位及其候选基因预测. 中国油料作物学报,2015,1:15-20.
Zhang F Q, Cheng X H, Liu Y Y, Tong C B, Dong C H, Yu J Y, Huang J Y, Liu S Y. QTL mapping of branch in Brassica napa and candidate gene prediction. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2015, 1: 15-20. (in Chinese)
[20]   孙美玉, 华玮, 刘静, 王新发, 刘贵华, 王汉中. 甘蓝型油菜主花序有效角果数QTL定位. 中国油料作物学报,2013,1:1-7.
Sun M Y, Hua W, Liu J, Wang X F, Liu G H, Wang H Z. QTLs for effective silique number of main in florescence on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Science, 2013, 1: 1-7. (in Chinese)
[21]   Zhang L, Yang G, Liu P, Hong D, Li S, He Q. Genetic and correlation analysis of silique-traits in Brassica napus L. by quantitative trait locus mapping. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2011, 122(1): 21-31.
[22]   王玉刚, 修文超, 沈宝宇, 周泽峰, 古君伶. 白菜和白菜型油菜角果相关性状遗传分析. 植物遗传资源学报,2013, 14(3):547-552.
Wang Y G, Xiu W C, Shen B Y, Zhou Z F, Gu J L. Genetic analysis of pod correlated traits in Brassica campestris. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2013, 14(3): 547-552. (in Chinese)
[23]   Kebede B, Cheema K, reenshields D L, Li C, Selvaraj G, Rahman H. Construction of genetic linkage map and mapping of QTL for seed color in Brassica rapa.. Genome, 2012, 55(12): 813-823.
[24]   孟霖. 白菜类作物氮利用效率的QTLs分析[D]. 昆明: 云南农业大学, 2012.
Meng L. QTL analysis of nitrogen use efficiency in Brassica rapa[D]. Kunming: Yunnan Agricultural University,2012. (in Chinese)
[25]   何余堂, 龙卫华, 胡进平, 傅廷栋, 李殿荣, 陈宝元, 涂金星.白菜型油菜角果多室性状的遗传及解剖学研究. 中国油料作物学报,2003, 25(1): 1-4.
He Y T, Long W H, Hu J P, Fu Y D, Li D R, Chen B Y, Tu J X. Anatomic and genetic studies on multicapsular character in Brassca campestris L.. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2003, 25(1): 1-4.(in Chinese)
[1] CHEN JiHao, ZHOU JieGuang, QU XiangRu, WANG SuRong, TANG HuaPing, JIANG Yun, TANG LiWei, $\boxed{\hbox{LAN XiuJin}}$, WEI YuMing, ZHOU JingZhong, MA Jian. Mapping and Analysis of QTL for Embryo Size-Related Traits in Tetraploid Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 203-216.
[2] TANG HuaPing,CHEN HuangXin,LI Cong,GOU LuLu,TAN Cui,MU Yang,TANG LiWei,LAN XiuJin,WEI YuMing,MA Jian. Unconditional and Conditional QTL Analysis of Wheat Spike Length in Common Wheat Based on 55K SNP Array [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1492-1502.
[3] ZHAO Ling, ZHANG Yong, WEI XiaoDong, LIANG WenHua, ZHAO ChunFang, ZHOU LiHui, YAO Shu, WANG CaiLin, ZHANG YaDong. Mapping of QTLs for Chlorophyll Content in Flag Leaves of Rice on High-Density Bin Map [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 825-836.
[4] WANG HuiLing, YAN AiLing, SUN Lei, ZHANG GuoJun, WANG XiaoYue, REN JianCheng, XU HaiYing. eQTL Analysis of Key Monoterpene Biosynthesis Genes in Table Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 977-990.
[5] LIU Jin,HU JiaXiao,MA XiaoDing,CHEN Wu,LE Si,JO Sumin,CUI Di,ZHOU HuiYing,ZHANG LiNa,SHIN Dongjin,LI MaoMao,HAN LongZhi,YU LiQin. Construction of High Density Genetic Map for RIL Population and QTL Analysis of Heat Tolerance at Seedling Stage in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(22): 4327-4341.
[6] XIE XiaoYu, WANG KaiHong, QIN XiaoXiao, WANG CaiXiang, SHI ChunHui, NING XinZhu, YANG YongLin, QIN JiangHong, LI ChaoZhou, MA Qi, SU JunJi. Restricted Two-Stage Multi-Locus Genome-Wide Association Analysis and Candidate Gene Prediction of Boll Opening Rate in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 248-264.
[7] LinHan ZOU,XinYing ZHOU,ZeYuan ZHANG,Rui YU,Meng YUAN,XiaoPeng SONG,JunTao JIAN,ChuanLiang ZHANG,DeJun HAN,QuanHao SONG. QTL Mapping of Thousand-Grain-Weight and Its Related Traits in Zhou 8425B × Xiaoyan 81 Population and Haplotype Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3473-3483.
[8] CHANG LiGuo,HE KunHui,LIU JianChao. Mining of Genetic Locus of Maize Stay-Green Related Traits Under Multi-Environments [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3071-3081.
[9] GUO ShuQing,SONG Hui,CHAI ShaoHua,GUO Yan,SHI Xing,DU LiHong,XING Lu,XIE HuiFang,ZHANG Yang,LI Long,FENG BaiLi,LIU JinRong,YANG Pu. QTL Analysis for Growth Period and Panicle-Related Traits in Foxtail Millet [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 2883-2898.
[10] HAO Jing,LI XiuKun,CUI ShunLi,DENG HongTao,HOU MingYu,LIU YingRu,YANG XinLei,MU GuoJun,LIU LiFeng. QTL Mapping for Traits Related to Seed Number Per Pod in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2500-2508.
[11] MENG XinHao,DENG HongTao,LI Li,CUI ShunLi,Charles Y. CHEN,HOU MingYu,YANG XinLei,LIU LiFeng. QTL Mapping for Lateral Branch Angle Related Traits of Cultivated Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1599-1612.
[12] ZHANG YaDong,LIANG WenHua,HE Lei,ZHAO ChunFang,ZHU Zhen,CHEN Tao,ZHAO QingYong,ZHAO Ling,YAO Shu,ZHOU LiHui,LU Kai,WANG CaiLin. Construction of High-Density Genetic Map and QTL Analysis of Grain Shape in Rice RIL Population [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(24): 5163-5176.
[13] LUO JiangTao,ZHENG JianMin,DENG QingYan,LIU PeiXun,PU ZongJun. The Genetic Contribution of the Important Breeding Parent Chuanmai 44 to Its Derivatives [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4255-4264.
[14] WANG Ling,CAI Yi,WANG GuiChao,WANG Di,SHENG YunYan. Specific Length Amplified Fragment (SFLA) Sequencing Mapping Construction and QTL Analysis of Fruit Related Traits in Muskmelon [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(19): 4196-4206.
[15] QU KeXin,HAN Lu,XIE JianGuo,PAN WenJing,ZHANG ZeXin,XIN DaWei,LIU ChunYan,CHEN QingShan,QI ZhaoMing. Mapping QTL for Soybean Fatty Acid Composition Based on RIL and CSSL Population [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3168-3182.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!