Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (14): 2796-2805.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.14.011

• HORTICULTURE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on Screening of Taste Evaluation Indexes for Apple

ZHENG Li-jing,NIE Ji-yun,LI Ming-qiang,KANG Yan-ling,KUANG Li-xue,YE Meng-liang   

  1. Institute of Pomology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Fruit (Xingcheng), Ministry of Agriculture/Supervision and Test Center of Fruit and Nursery Stock Quality (Xingcheng), Ministry of Agriculture, Xingcheng 125100, Liaoning
  • Received:2014-12-22 Online:2015-07-16 Published:2015-07-16

Abstract: 【Objective】 The aim of this study is to screen scientific evaluation indexes for apple taste. 【Method】 Six indexes of 132 apple samples were determined, including pH determined by acidity meter, total soluble solid (TSS) determined by brix meter, soluble sugar (SS) determined with the fehling reagent titration, titratable acidity (TA) determined with the indicator titration method, the taste of each sample was determined by tasting, the ratio of total soluble solid to titratable acidity (RTT), and the ratio of soluble sugar to titratable acidity (RST). Statistical methods (such as level analysis,regression analysis, cluster analysis, and factor analysis) were used to clarify the level of each index and its distribution, to clarify the variation tendency between indexes and the quantitative relationships between/among indexes, and to screen appropriate indexes for evaluating and classifing apple taste. 【Result】 The variances of three indexes (pH, TSS and SS) were all small, with the variable coefficient of 8.5%, 10.7% and 10.6%, respectively, while the variances of other three indexes (TA, RTT, and RST) were all big, with the variable coefficient of 45.1%, 64.9% and 66.5%. Both TSS and SS distributed normally, with the probability values of 0.6241 and 0.6298. pH, TA, RTT and RST distributed unnormally. pH, RTT and RST all had a significant negative correlation with TA, with the correlation coefficient of -0.8810, -0.8117 and -0.8116. Both RTT and RST had a significant positive correlation with pH, so did SS with TSS, and RST with RTT. pH had a significant logarithmic-function concerning TA with a determination coefficient of 0.8522. Between TSS and SS, as well as between RTT and RST, there was a significant linear function. RTT as well as RST had a significant power function concerning TA. Each of the six indexes mentioned above, except TA (with low fitting precision and low prediction accuracy), had a multivariate linear model concerning the other five indexes with the mean fitting error of 1.88%-2.74% and the mean prediction error of 1.83%-2.59%. From the six indexes studied, TA, TSS and RTT were screened as evaluation indexes of apple taste, which represented sour index, sweet index and comprehensive taste index, respectively. With use of these indexes, 132 apple samples can be divided into five classes that were sweet, sour-sweet, sweet-sour moderately, sweet-sour, and sour. 【Conclusion】 Apple taste can be scientifically evaluated and classified by three indexes, including TSS, TA and RTT.

Key words: apple, taste, evaluation index, cluster analysis, factor analysis, regression analysis

[1]    聂继云. 苹果的营养与功能. 保鲜与加工, 2013, 13(6): 56-59.
Nie J Y. Nutritional components of apple and their physiological functions to human health. Storage and Process, 2013, 13(6): 56-59. (in Chinese)
[2]    张放. 2012年全球主要水果生产变化简析(一). 统计分析, 2014, 31(2): 23-32.
Zhang F. Analysis of changes of global main fruit production in 2012 (one). Statistical Analysis, 2014, 31(2): 23-32. (in Chinese)
[3]    聂继云, 董雅凤. 果品质量安全标准与评价指标. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2014: 34-41.
Nie J Y, Dong Y F. Standards and Evaluation Indices for Fruit Quality and Safety. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2014: 34-41. (in Chiense)
[4]    贾定贤, 米文广, 杨儒琳, 陈素芬, 张凤兰. 苹果品种果实糖、酸含量的分级标准与风味的关系. 园艺学报, 1991, 18(1): 9-14.
Jia D X, Mi W G, Yang R L, Chen S F, Zhang F L. Sugar and acid content of fruit and its classification standard associated with flavor in different apple cultivars. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 1991, 18 (1): 9-14. (in Chinese)
[5]    陆秋农, 贾定贤. 中国果树志苹果卷. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社、中国林业出版社, 1999.
Lu Q N, Jia D X. Volume apples, Fruits tree of China. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, China Forestry Press, 1999. (in Chinese)
[6]    贾敬贤. 果树种质资源目录(第一集). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1993: 2-22.
Jia J X. List of Fruits Genetic Resources (Vol. 1). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1993: 2-22. (in Chinese)
[7]    贾敬贤. 果树种质资源目录(第二集). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998: 2-10.
Jia J X. List of Fruits Genetic Resources (Vol. 2). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998: 2-10. (in Chinese)
[8]    王昆, 刘凤之, 曹玉芬. 苹果种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005: 6-64.
Wang K, Liu F Z, Cao Y F. Descriptors and Data Standard for Apple (Malus spp. Mill.). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005: 6-64. (in Chinese)
[9]    王海波. 苹果早熟品种风味品质研究[D]. 山东泰安: 山东农业大学, 2009.
Wang H B. Study on flavor quality of early apple cultivars[D]. Tai’an, Shandong: Shandong Agricultural University, 2009. (in Chinese)
[10]   董月菊, 张玉刚, 梁美霞, 戴洪义. 苹果果实品质主要评价指标的选择. 华北农学报, 2011(26): 74-79.
Dong Y J, Zhang Y G, Liang M X, Dai H Y. Selection of main indexes for evaluating apple fruit quality. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2011(26): 74-79. (in Chinese)
[11]   王海波, 陈学森, 辛培刚, 张小燕, 慈志娟, 石俊, 张红. 几个早熟苹果品种果实糖酸组分及风味品质的评价. 果树学报, 2007, 24(4): 513-516.
Wang H B, Chen X S, Xin P G, Zhang X Y, Ci Z J, Shi J, Zhang H. Study on sugar and acid constituents in several early apple cultivars and evaluation of their flavor quality. Journal of Fruit Science, 2007, 24(4): 513-516. (in Chinese)
[12]   王海波, 李林光, 陈学森, 李慧峰, 杨建明, 刘嘉芬, 王超. 中早熟苹果品种果实的风味物质和风味品质. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(11): 2300-2306.
Wang H B, Li L G, Chen X S, Li H F, Yang J M, Liu J F, Wang C. Flavor compounds and flavor quality of fruits of mid-season apple cultivars. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(11): 2300-2306. (in Chinese)
[13]   聂继云. 果品质量安全分析技术. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2009: 10-38.
Nie J Y. Analytical Techniques of Fruit Quality and Safety. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2009: 10-38. (in Chinese)
[14]   唐启义. DPS©数据处理系统: 实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 719-743.
Tang Q Y. DPS©Data Processing System: Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Data Mining. Beijing: Science Press, 2010: 719-743. (in Chinese)
[15]   华中农学院. 果树研究法. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1992: 118-120.
Huazhong Agricultural College. Research Methods for Fruit Tree. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1992: 118-120. (in Chinese)
[16]   刘孟军. 枣树数量性状的概率分级研究. 园艺学报, 1996, 23(2): 105-109.
Liu M J. Studies on the variations and probability gradings of major quantitative characters of Chinese jujube. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 1996, 23(2): 105-109. (in Chinese)
[17]   刘平, 刘孟军, 周俊义, 毕平. 枣树数量性状的分布及其概率分级指标体系. 林业科学, 2003, 29(6): 77-82.
Liu P, Liu M J, Zhou J Y, Bi P. Distribution and probability grading index system of quantitive character of Chinese jujube. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2003, 29(6): 77-82. (in Chinese)
[18]   刘孟军. 桃树部分经济性状的种内变异及其分级标准研究. 北京农学院学报, 1992, 7(2): 98-105.
Liu M J. Studies on the variations and grading standard of several economic characters of peach. Journal of Beijing Agricultural College, 1992, 7(2): 98-105. (in Chinese)
[19]   关军峰. 果实品质生理. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 15-17.
Guan J F. Fruit Quality and Physiological. Beijing: Science Press, 2008: 15-17. (in Chinese)
[20]   聂继云, 李志霞, 李海飞, 李静, 王昆, 毋永龙, 徐国锋, 闫震, 吴锡, 覃兴. 苹果理化品质评价指标研究. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(14): 2895-2903.
Nie J Y, Li Z X, Li H F, Li J, Wang K, Wu Y L, Xu G F,Yan Z, Wu X, Qin X. Evaluation indices for apple physicochemical quality. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(14): 2895-2903. (in Chinese)
[21]   Pangbom R M. Relative taste of selected sugars and organic acid. Journal of Food Science, 1963, 28(6): 726-733.
[22]   Harker F R, Marsh K B, Young H, Murray S H, Gunson F A, Walker S B. Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 2: sweet and acid taste of apple fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2002, 24(3): 241-250.
[23]   Hampson C R, Quamme H A, Hall J W, MacDonald R A, King M C, Cliff M A. Sensory evaluation as a selection tool in apple breeding. Euphytica, 2000, 111: 79-90.
[24]   Doty T E. Fructose sweetness: A new dimension. Cereal Foods World, 1976, 21: 62-63.
[25]   Zhang L T. The sweetness of sugars. Journal of South China University of Technology, 2002, 30(1): 89-91.
[26]   夏延斌. 食品化学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2004: 250.
Xia Y B. Food Chemistry. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2004: 250. (in Chinese)
[27]   Róth E, Berna A, Beullens K, Yarramraju S, Lammertyn J, Schenk A, Nicolai B. Postharvest quality of integrated and organically produced apple fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2007, 45: 11-19.
[28]   赵尊行, 孙衍华, 黄化成. 山东苹果中可溶性糖、有机酸的研究. 山东农业大学学报, 1995, 26(3): 355-360.
Zhao Z X, Sun Y H, Huang H C. Research of soluble sugars and organic acids in apples of Shandong. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 1995, 26(3): 355-360. (in Chinese)
[29]   梁俊, 郭燕, 刘玉莲, 李敏敏, 赵政阳. 不同品种苹果果实中糖酸组成与含量分析. 西北农林科技学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 39(10): 163-170.
Liang J, Guo Y, Liu Y L, Li M M, Zhao Z Y. Analysis of contents and constituents of sugar and organic acid in different apple cultivars. Journal of Northwest A & F University: National Science Edition, 2011, 39(10): 163-170. (in Chinese)
[30]   Shiraishi M. Three descriptors for sugars to evaluate grape germplasm. Euphytica, 1993, 71(1): 99-106.
[31]   姚改芳, 张绍铃, 曹玉芬, 刘军, 吴俊, 袁江, 张虎平, 肖长城. 不同栽培种梨果实中可溶性糖组分及含量特征. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(20): 4229-4237.
Yao G F, Zhang S L, Cao Y F, Liu J, Wu J, Yuan J, Zhang H P, Xiao C C. Characteristics of components and contents of soluble sugars in pear fruits from different species. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(20): 4229-4237. (in Chinese)
[32]   徐吉花, 赵政阳, 王雷存, 高华, 刘振中, 樊红科. 苹果果实品质评价因子的选择研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(6): 269-274.
Xu J H, Zhao Z Y, Wang L C, Gao H, Liu Z Z, Fan H K. Selection of factors for apple fruit quality evaluation. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(6): 269-274. (in Chinese)
[1] DONG YongXin,WEI QiWei,HONG Hao,HUANG Ying,ZHAO YanXiao,FENG MingFeng,DOU DaoLong,XU Yi,TAO XiaoRong. Establishment of ALSV-Induced Gene Silencing in Chinese Soybean Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1710-1722.
[2] ZHU DaWei,ZHANG LinPing,CHEN MingXue,FANG ChangYun,YU YongHong,ZHENG XiaoLong,SHAO YaFang. Characteristics of High-Quality Rice Varieties and Taste Sensory Evaluation Values in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1271-1283.
[3] WANG XiuXiu,XING AiShuang,YANG Ru,HE ShouPu,JIA YinHua,PAN ZhaoE,WANG LiRu,DU XiongMing,SONG XianLiang. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Characters of Nature Population in Upland Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1082-1094.
[4] CHEN XueSen, YIN HuaLin, WANG Nan, ZHANG Min, JIANG ShengHui, XU Juan, MAO ZhiQuan, ZHANG ZongYing, WANG ZhiGang, JIANG ZhaoTao, XU YueHua, LI JianMing. Interpretation of the Case of Bud Sports Selection to Promote the High-Quality and Efficient Development of the World’s Apple and Citrus Industry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 755-768.
[5] LU Xiang, GAO Yuan, WANG Kun, SUN SiMiao, LI LianWen, LI HaiFei, LI QingShan, FENG JianRong, WANG DaJiang. Analysis of Aroma Characteristics in Different Cultivated Apple Strains [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 543-557.
[6] DU JinXia,LI YiSha,LI MeiLin,CHEN WenHan,ZHANG MuQing. Evaluation of Resistance to Leaf Scald Disease in Different Sugarcane Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4118-4130.
[7] GAO XiaoQin,NIE JiYun,CHEN QiuSheng,HAN LingXi,LIU Lu,CHENG Yang,LIU MingYu. Geographical Origin Tracing of Fuji Apple Based on Mineral Element Fingerprinting Technology [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4252-4264.
[8] BaoHua CHU,FuGuo CAO,NingNing BIAN,Qian QIAN,ZhongXing LI,XueWei LI,ZeYuan LIU,FengWang MA,QingMei GUAN. Resistant Evaluation of 84 Apple Cultivars to Alternaria alternata f. sp. mali and Genome-Wide Association Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3613-3628.
[9] SHEN Zhe,ZHANG RenLian,LONG HuaiYu,XU AiGuo. Research on Spatial Distribution of Soil Texture in Southern Ningxia Based on Machine Learning [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 2961-2972.
[10] XIE Bin,AN XiuHong,CHEN YanHui,CHENG CunGang,KANG GuoDong,ZHOU JiangTao,ZHAO DeYing,LI Zhuang,ZHANG YanZhen,YANG An. Response and Adaptability Evaluation of Different Apple Rootstocks to Continuous Phosphorus Deficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2598-2612.
[11] SONG BoWen,YANG Long,PAN YunFei,LI HaiQiang,LI Hao,FENG HongZu,LU YanHui. Effects of Agricultural Landscape on the Population Dynamic of Grapholitha molesta Adults in Apple Orchards in Southern Xinjiang [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(1): 85-95.
[12] NIE XingHua, ZHENG RuiJie, ZHAO YongLian, CAO QingQin, QIN Ling, XING Yu. Genetic Diversity Evaluation of Castanea in China Based on Fluorescently Labeled SSR [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1739-1750.
[13] JIANG WeiQin,HU Qun,YU Hang,MA HuiZhen,REN GaoLei,MA ZhongTao,ZHU Ying,WEI HaiYan,ZHANG HongCheng,LIU GuoDong,HU YaJie,GUO BaoWei. Effect of One-Time Basal Application of the Mixed Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilizer in Japonica Rice with Good Taste Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1382-1396.
[14] Hui LU,YuJie YUAN,SiQi ZHANG,Hong CHEN,Duo CHEN,XiaoYuan ZHONG,Bo LI,Fei DENG,Yong CHEN,GuiYong LI,WanJun REN. Evaluation of Rice Eating Quality and Optimization of Varieties of Southwest Indica Hybrid Rice Based on Three Taste Evaluation Methods [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1243-1257.
[15] LI KaiFeng,YIN YuHe,WANG Qiong,LIN TuanRong,GUO HuaChun. Correlation Analysis of Volatile Flavor Components and Metabolites Among Potato Varieties [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 792-803.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!