Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 1502-1511.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.08.006

• PLANT PROTECTION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Induced etr1-1 Expression in Petunias is Responsible for Its Tolerance to Botrytis cinerea

 WANG  Hong-1, LIN  Jing-1, LIU  Gang-2, LI  Chun-Xia-2, LUO  Chang-Guo-3, LI  Gang-Bo-2, ZHANG  Zhen-2, CHANG  You-Hong-1   

  1. 1、江苏省农业科学院园艺研究所/江苏省高效园艺作物遗传改良重点实验室,南京210014;
    2、南京农业大学园艺学院,南京210095;
    3、贵州果树科学研究所,贵阳 550006
  • Received:2013-07-10 Online:2014-04-15 Published:2013-10-18

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to clarify the effect of induced etr1-1 expression on petunia response to infection by Botrytis cinerea, the causal agent of gray mold disease. 【Method】Detached leaves of GVG: etr1-1 transgenic petunias treated by DEX were inoculated with B. cinerea, then the regulation mechanism of etr1-1 was investigated by observing disease symptoms, measuring disease severity and analyzing gene expression by quantitative RT-PCR and semi-quantitative RT-PCR. 【Result】Induced etr1-1 expression by dexamethasone resulted in the retarded senescence and reduced disease symptoms on detached leaves. During the period of inoculation, the percentage of increased disease incidence was 0 on DEX-treated leaves, whereas 66.77% on control leaves. The growth rate of the leaf lesions on DEX-treated leaves was 4.69 mm•d-1, whereas 6.29 mm•d-1 on control leaves. qRT-PCR and semi-qRT-PCR provided the following results. The extent of decreased disease incidence was negatively correlated with the etr1-1 expression. Following prolonged induction time, the level of etr1-1 expression was enhanced on DEX-treated leaves and obtained the peak at 3rd day after DEX treatment. 10.71-fold changes were increased on mock-inoculating leaves than that on B. cinerea-inoculating leaves. The maximum expression of Bcact was obtained at 1 dpi on DEX-treated leaves, whereas, at 2 dpi on control leaves. The maximum level of Bcact expression was 20-fold lower on DEX-treated leaves than that on control leaves. Infection of B. cinerea activated CP10 expression and caused the senescence symptom. In comparison, 23.6-fold changes were decreased on DEX-treated leaves than on control leaves. The expression of ACO exhibited a decline after an up on both DEX-treated and control leaves. The peak of expression level was observed at 2 dpi. The peak of expression of ACO was only 6.75 on DEX-treated leaves, which suggested 7.33-fold lower than that on control leaves. On DEX-treated leaves with induced etr1-1 expression, repressed genes expressions in ethylene/JA pathway decreased ERF4 and ERF8 expression and consequently reduced pathogenesis-related gene expression. The expressions of ERS1 and ETR2 were observed and the peak of expression came out at 3 dpi on both DEX-treated and control leaves, however, 51-fold lower expression was observed on DEX-treated leaves than that on control leaves. The expression was suppressed at 1 and 2 dpi, and activated at 3 dpi on DEX-treated leaves. Following the prolonged inoculation time, the level of EIN2 expression was enhanced on control leaves. It was found that the maximum expression on DEX-treated leaves was 31.58-fold lower than that on control leaves. The expression of EIL1 showed the similar patterns as that of EIN2. It was observed that 2-fold lower expression of EIN2 on DEX-treated leaves than that on control leaves. AOC and COI1 played important roles in the biosynthesis and signal pathway of jasmonic acid. The expression of AOC and COI1 was repressed at 1-2 dpi and activated at 3 dpi on DEX-treated leaves, however, the expression level was increased following the prolonged inoculation time on control leaves. It was found that 12.96-fold lower expression on DEX-treated leaves than on control leaves. The expression of COI1 was discovered and obtained the peak at 3 dpi, regardless of DEX-treated leaves and control leaves. It was observed that 6.14-fold lower expression of COI1 on DEX-treated leaves than on control leaves. The expression of ethylene response factors (ERFs), as downstream components, integrated the ethylene and JA signaling pathway. The expression of ERF4 showed up before a decrease pattern on DEX-treated leaves. The expression level of ERF4 showed rising patterns following inoculation. The expressions of ERF8 displayed ascend patterns following the prolonged inoculation time, regardless of DEX-treated and control leaves. It was found that 2.96- and 3.52-fold lower expression of ERF4 and ERF8 on DEX-treated leaves than on control leaves. Little expression of pathogenesis-related genes was monitored on DEX-treated leaves and the peak of all genes was lower than 10, whereas, the expression was enhanced on control leaves, such as, the maximum level of expression of PR1, EX-CHI, OSM, Defense1 and AC-CHI was 10 521.11, 184.95, 184.96, 23.39 and 14.58, respectively.【Conclusion】Induced etr1-1 expression delayed the senescence of leaves of petunia caused by B. cinerea and was consequently responsible for tolerance of GVG: etr1-1 transgenic petunias to B. cinerea.

Key words: petunia ×, hybrida ‘Mitchell diploid&rsquo, Botrytis cinerea , ethylene , jasmonic acid , senescence , defense response

[1]Chang C, Kwok S F, Bleecker A B, Meyerowitz E M. Arabidopsis ethylene-response gene ETR1: similarity of product to two-component regulators. Science, 1993, 262(5133): 539-544.

[2]O'Donnell P J, Calvert C, Atzorn R, Wasternack C, Leyser H M O, Bowles D J. Ethylene as a signal mediating the wound response of tomato plants. Science, 1996, 274(5294): 1914-1917.

[3]Hoffman T, Schmidt J S, Zheng X, Bent A F. Isolation of ethylene-insensitive soybean mutants that are altered in pathogen susceptibility and gene for gene disease resistance. Plant Physiology, 1999, 119: 935-949.

[4]Thomma B P H J, Eggermont K, Tierens K F M J, Broekaert W F. Requirement of functional ethylene-insensitive 2 gene for efficient resistance of Arabidopsis to infection by Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiology, 1999, 121: 1093-1101.

[5]Knoester M, van Loon L C, van den Heuvel J, Hennig J, Bol J F, Linthorst H J M. Ethylene-insensitive tobacco lacks nonhost resistance against soil-borne fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1998, 95: 1933-1937.

[6]Balaji V, Mayrose M, Sherf O, Jacob-Hirsch J, Eichenlaub R, Iraki N, Manulis-Sasson S, Rechavi G, Barash I, Sessa G. Tomato transcriptional changes in response to Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis reveal a role for ethylene in disease development. Plant Physiology, 2008, 146(4): 1797-1809.

[7]Jones M L, Chaffin G S, Eason J R, Clark D G. Ethylene-sensitivity regulates proteolytic activity and cysteine protease gene expression in petunia corollas. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2005, 56(420): 2733-2744.

[8]Serek M, Woltering E, Sisler E, Frello S, Sriskandarajah S. Controlling ethylene responses in flowers at the receptor level. Biotechnology Advances, 2006, 24(4): 368-381.

[9]Clark D G, Gubrium E K, Barrett J E, Nell T A, Klee H J. Root formation in ethylene-insensitive plants. Plant Physiology, 1999, 121(1): 53-59.

[10]Gubrium E K, Clevenger D J, Clark D G, Barrett J E, Nell T A. Reproduction and horticultural performance of transgenic ethylene- insensitive petunias. Journal of America Society of Horticultural Science, 2000, 125(3): 277-281.

[11]Wang H, Steir G, Lin J, Gang L, Zhang Z, Chang Y, Reid M S, Jiang C Z. Transcriptome changes associated with delayed flower senescence on transgenic petunia by inducing expression of etr1-1, a mutant ethylene receptor. PLos One, 2013, 8(7): e65800.

[12]Cantu D, Vicente A R, Greve L C, Dewey F M, Bennett A B, Labavitch J M, Powell A L T. The intersection between cell wall disassembly, ripening, and fruit susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(3): 859-864.

[13]Asselbergh B, Curvers K, França S C, Audenaert K, Vuylsteke M, Van Breusegem F, Höfte M. Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in sitiens, an abscisic acid-deficient tomato mutant, involves timely production of hydrogen peroxide and cell wall modifications in the epidermis. Plant Physiology, 2007, 144(4): 1863-1877.

[14]Craft J, Samalova M, Baroux C, Townley H, Martinez A, Jepson I, Tsiantis M, Moore I. New pOp/LhG4 vectors for stringent glucocorticoid-dependent transgene expression in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 2005, 41(6): 899-918.

[15]Wang H, Liu G, Li C, Powell A L, Reid M S, Zhang Z, Jiang C Z. Defence responses regulated by jasmonate and delayed senescence caused by ethylene receptor mutation contribute to the tolerance of petunia to Botrytis cinerea. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2013, 14(5): 453-469.

[16]Benito E P, ten Have A, van’t Klooster J W, van Kan J A L. Fungal and plant gene expression during synchronized infection of tomato leaves by Botrytis cinerea. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 1998, 104(2): 207-220.

[17]Díza J, ten Have A, van Kan J A L. The role of ethylene and wound signaling in resistance of tomato to Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiology, 2002, 129: 1341-1351.

[18]Swartzberg D, Kirshner B, Rav-David D, Elad Y, Granot D. Botrytis cinerea induces senescence and is inhibited by autoregulated expression of the IPT gene. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2008, 120(3): 289-297.

[19]Ahkami A H, Lischewski S, Haensch K T, Porfirova S, Hofmann J, Rolletschek H, Melzer M, Franken P, Hause B, Druege U, Hajirezaei M R. Molecular physiology of adventitious root formation in Petunia hybrida cuttings: involvement of wound response and primary metabolism. New Phytologist, 2009, 181(3): 613-625.

[20]Breuillin F, Schramm J, Hajirezaei M, Ahkami A, Favre P, Druege U, Hause B, Bucher M, Kretzschmar T, Bossolini E, Kuhlemeier C, Martinoia E, Franken P, Scholz U, Reinhardt D. Phosphate systemically inhibits development of arbuscular mycorrhiza in Petunia hybrida and represses genes involved in mycorrhizal functioning. The Plant Journal, 2010, 64(6): 1002-1017.

[21]Feys B, Benedetti C E, Penfold C N, Turner J G. Arabidopsis mutants selected for resistance to the phytotoxin coronatine are male sterile, insensitive to methyl jasmonate, and resistant to a bacterial pathogen. The Plant Cell, 1994, 6: 751-759.

[22]Xie D X, Feys B F, James S, Nieto-Rostro M, Turner J G. COI1: an Arabidopsis gene required for jasmonate-regulated defense and fertility. Science, 1998, 280(5366): 1091-1094.

[23]Lorenzo O, Piqueras R, Sanchez-Serrano J J, Solano R. Ethylene Response Factor1 integrates signals from ethylene and jasmonate pathways in plant defense. The Plant Cell, 2003, 15(1): 165-178.

[24]Leon-Reyes A, Du Y, Koornneef A, Proietti S, Korbes A P, Memelink J, Pieterse C M, Ritsema T. Ethylene signaling renders the jasmonate response of Arabidopsis insensitive to future suppression by salicylic acid. Molucular Plant-Microbe Interaction, 2010, 23(2): 187-197.

[25]Broekaert W F, Delaure S L, De Bolle M F, Cammue B P. The role of ethylene in host-pathogen interactions. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2006, 44: 393-416.

[26]Tsuchisaka A, Yu G X, Jin H L, Alonso J M, Ecker J R, Zhang X M, Gao S, Theologis A. A combinatorial interplay among the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate isoforms regulates ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics, 2009, 183(3): 979-1003.

[27]Grbi? V, Bleecker A B. Ethylene regulates the timing of leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 1995, 8(4): 595-602.

[28]Kende H. Ethylene biosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1993, 44(1): 283-307.

[29]Yang S F, Hoffman N E. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1984, 35(1): 155-189.

[30]Penninckx I A M A, Thomma B P H J, Buchala A, Métraux J P, Broekaerta W F. Concomitant activation of jasmonate and ethylene response pathways is required for induction of a plant defensin gene in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 1998, 10(12): 2103-2113.

[31]Plett J M, Cvetkovska M, Makenson P, Xing T, Regan S. Arabidopsis ethylene receptors have different roles in fumonisin B1-induced cell death. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 2009, 74(1): 18-26.
[1] SHAO ShuJun,HU ZhangJian,SHI Kai. The Role and Mechanism of Linoleyl Ethanolamide in Plant Resistance Against Botrytis cinerea in Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(9): 1781-1789.
[2] GUO ZeXi,SUN DaYun,QU JunJie,PAN FengYing,LIU LuLu,YIN Ling. The Role of Chalcone Synthase Gene in Grape Resistance to Gray Mold and Downy Mildew [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1139-1148.
[3] FANG MengYing,LU Lin,WANG QingYan,DONG XueRui,YAN Peng,DONG ZhiQiang. Effects of Ethylene-Chlormequat-Potassium on Root Morphological Construction and Yield of Summer Maize with Different Nitrogen Application Rates [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(24): 4808-4822.
[4] YuXia WEN,Jian ZHANG,Qin WANG,Jing WANG,YueHong PEI,ShaoRui TIAN,GuangJin FAN,XiaoZhou MA,XianChao SUN. Cloning, Expression and Anti-TMV Function Analysis of Nicotiana benthamiana NbMBF1c [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3543-3555.
[5] LÜ ZhiWei,DU Kang,ZHOU ZhiGuo,ZHAO WenQing,HU Wei,ZHAO JianMing,ZHU SuQin,WANG YouHua. Research on Senescence Process and Suitable Indicators of Maize Ear Leaves [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2311-2323.
[6] WANG Ping,ZHENG ChenFei,WANG Jiao,HU ZhangJian,SHAO ShuJun,SHI Kai. The Role and Mechanism of Tomato SlNAC29 Transcription Factor in Regulating Plant Senescence [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(24): 5266-5276.
[7] YE Di,SHI Jiang,GAO ShuangCheng,WANG ZhanYing,SHI GuoAn. Correlation Analysis of Auxin Involved in the Process of Petal Abscission of Tree Peony Luoyanghong Cut Flowers by Ethylene Promoting [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 5097-5109.
[8] YUE YingXiao,HE JinGang,ZHAO JiangLi,YAN ZiRu,CHENG YuDou,WU XiaoQi,WANG YongXia,GUAN JunFeng. Comparison Analysis on Volatile Compound and Related Gene Expression in Yali Pear During Cellar and Cold Storage Condition [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4635-4649.
[9] LIU ChangYun,LI XinYu,TIAN ShaoRui,WANG Jing,PEI YueHong,MA XiaoZhou,FAN GuangJin,WANG DaiBin,SUN XianChao. Cloning, Expression and Anti-Virus Function Analysis of Solanum lycopersicum SlN-like [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4348-4357.
[10] ZHANG JingYun,LIU YuNuo,WANG ZhaoHao,PENG AiHong,CHEN ShanChun,HE YongRui. Analysis of Resistance Mechanism of CiNPR4 Transgenic Plants to Citrus Canker [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(18): 3871-3880.
[11] ZHAO Xue,WANG Feng,WANG WenJing,LIU XiaoFeng,BIAN ShiQuan,LIU YanHua,LIU XinMin,DU YongMei,ZHANG ZhongFeng,ZHANG HongBo. Splicing Property Analyses of the NRSE1 Element from Tobacco PR3b mRNA After Fusion Expression with GUS Gene [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1524-1531.
[12] DU YanMin,WANG WenHui,JIA XiaoHui,TONG Wei,WANG Yang,ZHANG XinNan. The Effects of Different Oxygen Concentration on Postharvest Physiology and Storage Quality of Yali Pear [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4918-4928.
[13] QIN XiuJuan,QI JingJing,DOU WanFu,CHEN ShanChun,HE YongRui,LI Qiang. Identification of Rboh Family and the Response to Hormone and Citrus Bacterial Canker in Citrus [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(20): 4189-4203.
[14] BAI YanWen,ZHANG HongJun,ZHU YaLi,ZHENG XueHui,YANG Mei,LI CongFeng,ZHANG RenHe. Responses of Canopy Radiation and Nitrogen Distribution, Leaf Senescence and Radiation Use Efficiency on Increased Planting Density of Different Variety Types of Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(15): 3059-3070.
[15] Jian PAN,HaiFan WEN,HuanLe HE,HongLi LIAN,Gang WANG,JunSong PAN,Run CAI. Genome-Wide Identification of Cucumber ERF Gene Family and Expression Analysis in Female Bud Differentiation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 133-147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!