Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2013, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (19): 4091-4100.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.19.015

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis on the Soil and Water Conservation Benefits of Four Bunds at Edges of Sloping Land in Purple Hilly Area

WANG San-Shu-1, LIU De-Zhong-2, SHI Dong-Mei-1, HUANG Xian-Zhi-3, TANG Xue-Wen-4, LI Ye-Xin-1, GAN Xue-Lian-5   

  1. 1.College of Natural Resources and Environment/Institute of Soil and Water Conservation and Eco-environment,Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
    2.Chongqing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Station of Soil and Water Conservation Ecology, Chongqing 401147
    3.Institute of Sericulture and Systems Biology, Southwest University,Chongqing 400715
    4.Chongqing Water Conservancy Bureau, Chongqing 401147
    5.Pengxi River Wetland Nature Reserve Management Bureau,Chongqing 405400
  • Received:2013-03-14 Online:2013-10-01 Published:2013-07-29

Abstract: 【Objective】 The article aimed to study the soil and water conservation benefits of four bunds at edges of sloping land in purple hilly area. 【Method】 A systematic analysis of the soil and water conservation benefits and its influencing factors of various bunds was made through such comprehensive research approaches as soil physical and mechanical properties analysis and so on. 【Result】 Soil total porosity of different bunds planted with vegetation were shown as mulberry>prickly ash>alfalfa>natural grass; a similar varying trends of initial infiltration rate, final infiltration rate and mean infiltration rate for each kind of bund existed, which showing a trend of mulberry>prickly ash>alfalfa>natural grass. Soil available water storage of all bunds was obviously different (P<0.05) from natural grass, which presented as the bund planted with tree>grass>natural grass. During the process of water storage for all bunds, the higher the soil non-capillary porosity and soil total porosity was, the better the soil infiltration capacity could be. The larger the soil bulk density was, the worse soil infiltration capability and soil perviousness would be, which leading to larger unavailable soil reservoir, and also making it is difficult for crops on sloping lands to absorb soil water. Soil shear strength of all bunds was in the order as alfalfa (0.38 kg•cm-2)>prickly ash (0.25 kg•cm-2)>mulberry (0.22 kg•cm-2)>natural grass (0.18 kg•cm-2), and internal friction angle of the bunds of prickly ash was the biggest(20.76°)among these bunds. The internal friction angle of all bunds had a significant negative correlation with fractal dimension of particle size distribution, initial water content of soil, while it had a significant positive correlation with fractal dimension of aggregate size distribution. However, soil cohesion and shear strength had a significant negative correlation with fractal dimension of particle size distribution and a significant positive correlation with soil dispersion, but soil cohesion and shear strength did not correlate significantly with fractal dimension of aggregate size distribution. 【Conclusion】 All bunds in purple hilly area improved the available soil reservoir by the way of improving soil physical properties such as soil pore structure and so on, which preventing sloping land from the damage of local seasonal drought. Moreover, the bunds also enhanced the soil shear strength and the ability of resistance to rainfall and runoff erosion, which obviously ensuring the stable productivity of sloping land in purple hilly area

Key words: bunds planted with vegetation , soil and water conservation , benefit , sloping land , purple hilly area

[1]谢俊齐, 唐程杰, 李宪文, 孙丹峰. 中国坡耕地. 北京: 中国大地出版社, 2005.

Xie J Q, Tang C J, Li X W, Sun D F. Slope Land of China. Beijing: China Land Press, 2005. (in Chinese)

[2]蔡强国. 冀西北黄土丘陵区复合农林业与水土保持综合技术研究.北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 1998.

Cai Q G. Agroforestry and Soil Conservation in the Hilly Loess Region of Northwest Hebei. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1998. (in Chinese)

[3]张宇清, 朱清科, 齐实. 梯田埂坎立地植物根系分布特征及其对土壤水分的影响. 生态学报, 2005, 25(3): 500-506.

Zhang Y Q, Zhu Q K, Qi S. Root system distribution characteristics of plants on the terrace banks and their impact on soil moisture. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(3): 500-506. (in Chinese)

[4]Fristensky A J, Grismer M E. Evaluation of ultrasonic aggregate stability and rainfall erosion resistance of disturbed and amended soils in the Lake Tahoe Basin, USA. Catena, 2009, 79: 93-102.

[5]汪三树, 史东梅, 蒋光毅, 郭宏忠, 黄先智, 彭旭东, 甘雪莲. 紫色丘陵区坡耕地生物埂的土壤结构稳定性与抗蚀性分析. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(6): 31-35.

Wang S S, Shi D M, Jiang G Y, Guo H Z, Huang X Z, Peng X D, Gan X L. Analysis of soil structure stability and corrosion resistance of slop land bio-bank in Purple Hilly Area. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 26(6): 31-35. (in Chinese)

[6]Lupwayi N Z, Haque I. Leucaena hedgerow intercropping and cattle manure application in the Ethiopian highlands Ⅰ: Decomposition and nutrient release. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1999, 28(2): 182-195.

[7]曹世雄, 陈莉, 高旺盛. 黄土丘陵区软埂梯田复式配置技术. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(8): 1443-1449.

Cao S X, Chen L, Gao W S. Soft-ridged bench terrace design in hilly loess region. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(8): 1443-1449. (in Chinese)

[8]周兴魁, 蔡强国. 黄土丘陵区的地埂植物篱——紫穗槐. 山西水土保持科技, 1997(2): 32-34.

Zhou X K, Cai Q G. The terrace hedgerows in Loess Hilly Region. Soil and Water Conservation Science and Technology in Shanxi, 1997(2): 32-34. (in Chinese)

[9]Oyedele D J, Awotoye O O, Popoola S E. Soil physical and chemical properties under continuous maize cultivation as influenced by hedgerow trees species on an alfisol in South Western Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2009, 4(8): 736-739.

[10]王喜龙, 蔡强国, 王忠科, 孙国亮. 冀西北黄土丘陵沟壑区梯田地埂植物篱的固埂作用与效益分析. 自然资源学报, 2001, 15(10): 74-79.

Wang X L, Cai Q G, Wang Z K, Sun G L. The consolidating function and economic benefit analysis of the terrace hedgerows in the hilly loess region of northwest Hebei Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2000, 15(10): 74-79. (in Chinese)

[11]王喜龙, 蔡强国, 王忠科. 不同生物埂生态效益的模糊对比分析与评价. 土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报, 1999, 5(3): 27-32.

Wang X L, Cai Q G, Wang Z K. Fuzzy comparison analysis and evaluation on ecological benefits of various bunds planted with vegetation. Journal of Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation, 1999, 5(3): 27-32. (in Chinese)

[12]朱钟麟, 卿明福, 刘定辉, 孙松国, 曹均成. 衰草根系特征及衰草经济植物埂的水土保持功能. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(1): 164-167.

Zhu Z L, Qing M F, Liu D H, Sun S G, Cao J C. Characteristics of root system of eulaliopsis binata and ecological benefits of plant used as hedgerow for slope stabilization. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2006, 43(1): 164-167. (in Chinese)

[13]Everson C S, Everson T M, van Niekerk W. Soil water competition in a temperate hedgerow agroforestry system in South Africa. Agroforestry Systems, 2009, 75(3): 211-221.

[14]王忠林, 李会科, 贺秀贤. 渭北旱塬花椒地埂林土壤抗蚀抗冲性研究. 水土保持研究, 2000, 7(1): 33-37.

Wang Z L, Li H K, He X X. Study on soil anti-erosion and anti-scour of prickly ash at edges of terraces in Drought Upland of Weibei. Reaearch of Soil and Water Conservation, 2000, 7(1): 33-37. (in Chinese)

[15]唐书峰, 杨鑫. 黄土河小流域植物护埂模式及效果研究. 中国水土保持, 2003(3): 27-31.

Tang S F, Yang X. Study on the mode and effects of borders protected by plants of the Huangtu River Watershed. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2003(3): 27-31. (in Chinese)

[16]潘剑君, Bergsma I E. 利用土壤入渗速率和土壤抗剪力确定土壤侵蚀等级. 水土保持学报, 1995, 9(2): 93-96.

Pan J J, Bergsma I E. Determination of soil erosion class using soil infiltration rate and soil shear resistance. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995, 9(2): 93-96. (in Chinese)

[17]孟秦倩, 王健, 吴发启. 延安丘陵沟壑区坡面果园土壤水库特征. 灌溉排水学报, 2008, 27(1): 93-95.

Meng Q Q, Wang J, Wu F Q. Characteristics of slope-orchard soil reservoir in Yanan loess hilly region. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2008, 27(1): 93-95. (in Chinese)

[18]王云琦, 王玉杰, 张洪江, 肖江伟, 吴云, 陈林. 重庆缙云山不同土地利用类型土壤结构对土壤抗剪性能的影响. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(3): 40-45.

Wang Y Q, Wang Y J, Zhang H J, Xiao J W, Wu Y, Chen L. Impacts of soil structure on shear-resistantance of soil under different land uses in Jinyun mountain of Chongqing City. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2006, 22(3): 40-45. (in Chinese)

[19]中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤物理分析. 北京: 科学出版社, 1978.

Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Soil Physical and Chemical Analysis. Beijing: Science Press, 1978. (in Chinese)

[20]杨培岭, 罗远培, 石元春. 用粒径的重量分布表征土壤分形特征. 科学通报, 1993, 38(20): 1896-1899.

Yang P L, Luo Y P, Shi Y C. Soil fractal characteristics measured by mass of particle-size distribution. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1993, 38(20): 1896-1899. (in Chinese)

[21]刘洁, 李贤伟, 纪中华, 张健, 张良辉, 周义贵. 元谋干热河谷三种植被恢复模式土壤贮水及入渗特性. 生态学报, 2011, 31(8): 2331-2340.

Liu J, Li X W, Ji Z H, Zhang J, Zhang L H, Zhou Y G. Soil water holding capacities and infiltration characteristics of three vegetation restoration models in dry-hot valley of Yuanmou. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(8): 2331-2340. (in Chinese)

[22]Yu L, Bo J F, Yi H L, Zhi W, Guangyao G. Hydrological responses and soil erosion potential of abandoned cropland in the Loess Plateau, China. Geomorphology, 2012, 138: 404-414.

[23]黄道友, 彭廷柏, 陈桂秋, 王克林. 亚热带红壤丘陵区季节性干旱成因及其发生规律研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2004, 12(1): 124-126.

Huang D Y, Peng T B, Chen G Q, Wang K L. Study on causes and occurrence rules of seasonal drought in subtropical red soil hilly region. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2004, 12(1): 124-126. (in Chinese)

[24]Tao P, Shi J W. Effects of land use, land cover and rainfall regimes on the suiface runoff and soil loss on karst slopes in southwest China. Catena, 2012, 90: 53-62.

[25]Baum R L, Coe J A, Godt J W, Harp E L, Reid M E, Savage W Z, Michael J A. Regional landslide-hazard assessment for Seattle, Washington, USA. Landslides, 2005, 2(4): 266-279.

[26]Carrara A, Pike R J. GIS technology and models for assessing lands lide hazard and risk. Geomorphology, 2008, 94(3/4): 257-260.

[27]Pollen-Bankhead N, Simon A. Hydrologic and hydraulic effects of riparian root networks on streambank stability: Is mechanical root-reinforcement the whole story? Geomorphology, 2010, 116(3): 353-362.

[28]陈红星, 李法虎, 郝仕玲, 张心平. 土壤含水率与土壤酸碱度对土壤抗剪强度的影响. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(2): 21-25.

Chen H X, Li F H, Hao S L, Zhang X P. Effects of soil water content and soil sodicity on soil shearing strength. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 23(2): 21-25. (in Chinese)

[29]石辉, 陈凤琴, 刘世荣. 岷江上游森林土壤大孔隙特征及其对水分出流速率的影响. 生态学报, 2005, 25(3): 507-512.

Shi H, Chen F Q, Liu S R. Macropores properties of forest soil and its influence on water effluent in the upper reaches of Mingjiang River. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25(3): 507-512. (in Chinese)

[30]Li L, Ya T, Jia S X, Yuan L Y. The role of marginal agricultural land-based mulberry planting in biomass energy production. Renewable Energy, 2009, 34:1789-1794.

[31]Tang Y, Zhang Y Z, Xie J S, Sun H. Incorporation of mulberry in contour hedgerows to increase overall benefits: a case study from Ningnan County, Sichuan Province, China. Agricultural Systems, 2003, 76: 775-785.

[32]史东梅, 卢喜平, 刘立志. 三峡库区紫色土坡地桑基植物篱水土保持作用研究. 水土保持学报, 2005, 19(3): 75-79.

Shi D M, Lu X P, Liu L Z. Study on functions of soil and water conservation by mulberry hedgerow intercropping of purple soil slopping farmland in Three Gorges Reservoir Region. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 19(3): 75-79. (in Chinese)

[33]史东梅, 陈晏. 紫色丘陵区农林混作模式的土壤抗冲性影响因素.中国农业科学, 2008, 41(5): 1400-1409.

Shi D M, Chen Y. The influencing factors of soil anti-scouribility of tree-crop intercropping land in Purple Soil Hilly Region. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(5): 1400-1409. (in Chinese)

[34]王力, 卫三平, 王全九. 黄土丘陵区燕沟流域农林草地土壤水库充失水过程模拟. 林业科学, 2011, 47(1): 29-35.

Wang L, Wei S P, Wang Q J. Simulation of soil moisture dynamics under farmland, woodlang and grassland in Yangou small watershed of the hill-gully region of the loess plateau. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2011, 47(1): 29-35. (in Chinese)

[35]Pefect E, McLaughlin N B, Kay B D, Topp G C. An improved fractal equation for the soil water retention curve. Water Resources Research, 1996, 32(2): 281-287.
[1] LI Qian,QIN YuBo,YIN CaiXia,KONG LiLi,WANG Meng,HOU YunPeng,SUN Bo,ZHAO YinKai,XU Chen,LIU ZhiQuan. Effect of Drip Fertigation Mode on Maize Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(8): 1604-1616.
[2] GOU ZhiWen,YIN Wen,CHAI Qiang,FAN ZhiLong,HU FaLong,ZHAO Cai,YU AiZhong,FAN Hong. Analysis of Sustainability of Multiple Cropping Green Manure in Wheat-Maize Intercropping After Wheat Harvested in Arid Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1319-1331.
[3] FANG HaoYuan, YANG Liang, WANG HongZhuang, CAO JinCheng, REN WanPing, WEI ShengJuan, YAN PeiShi. Effects of Cross-Ventilation System on Physiology and Production Performance of Beef Cattle in Summer [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 1025-1036.
[4] ZHANG JinRui,REN SiYang,DAI JiZhao,DING Fan,XIAO MouLiang,LIU XueJun,YAN ChangRong,GE TiDa,WANG JingKuan,LIU Qin,WANG Kai,ZHANG FuSuo. Influence of Plastic Film on Agricultural Production and Its Pollution Control [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 3983-3996.
[5] WANG Liang,LIU YuanYuan,QIAN Xin,ZHANG Hui,DAI HongCui,LIU KaiChang,GAO YingBo,FANG ZhiJun,LIU ShuTang,LI ZongXin. The Single Season Wheat Straw Returning to Promote the Synergistic Improvement of Carbon Efficiency and Economic Benefit in Wheat- Maize Double Cropping System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 350-364.
[6] ZHOU Ying,MEI XuRong,YANG Peng,LIU Jing. Theoretical Connotations and Pricing Mechanisms for Agricultural Ecological Compensation Within the Context of Green Development [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4358-4369.
[7] MI XiaoTian,SHI Lei,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui. Fertilizer Reduction Potential and Economic Benefits of Crop Production for Smallholder Farmers in Shaanxi Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4370-4384.
[8] LI YongHua,WU XuePing,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui. Benefits of Yield, Environment and Economy from Substituting Fertilizer by Manure for Wheat Production of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4879-4890.
[9] ZHANG XinXin,SHI Lei,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui. Potential of Fertilizer Reduction and Benefits of Environment and Economic for Cereal Crops Production in Shaanxi Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(19): 4010-4023.
[10] WANG KeJian,LI Li,LÜ Qiang,YI ShiLai,ZHENG YongQiang,XIE RangJin,MA YanYan,HE ShaoLan,DENG Lie. UAV Spray Technology for the Citrus Orchard: Taking Control of the Diaphorina citri and Phyllocnistis citrella as Examples [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(17): 3509-3517.
[11] LOU YiBao,SHI DongMei,JIN HuiFang,JIANG GuangYi,DUAN Teng,JIANG Na. Coupling Degree Diagnosis on Suitability Evaluation of Cultivated-Layer Quality for Slope Farmland in Purple Hilly Region of South-Western China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(4): 661-675.
[12] SUN ShiJun,ZHU ZhenChuang,CHEN ZhiJun,YANG Dan,ZHANG XuDong. Effects of Different Colored Plastic Film Mulching and Planting Density on Soil Temperature, Evapotranspiration and Yield of Spring Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(19): 3323-3336.
[13] Xia XU,YaNan ZHAO,YuFang HUANG,JunYing YAN,YouLiang YE. Fertilization Effect of Wheat Under Different Soil Fertilities [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(21): 4076-4086.
[14] ZHAO YaLi, LIU WeiLing, CHENG SiXian, ZHOU YaNan, ZHOU JinLong, WANG XiuLing, ZHANG MouBiao, WANG Qun, LI ChaoHai . Effects of Pattern of Deep Tillage on Topsoil Features, Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Lime Concretion Black Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(13): 2489-2503.
[15] CHENG YanHong, HUANG QianRu, WU Lin, HUANG ShangShu, ZHONG YiJun, SUN YongMing, ZHANG Kun, ZHANG XinLiang. Effects of Straw Mulching and Vetiver Grass Hedgerows on Soil Enzyme Activities and Soil Microbial Community Structure in Red Soil Sloping Land [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(23): 4602-4612.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!