接种土著和外源AM真菌对杜梨抗旱性的影响及其适应机制

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.01.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】丛枝菌根（AM）真菌可改善植物生长，提高抗环境胁迫能力。筛选对梨苗具有抵御干旱胁迫的AM真菌，为梨菌根化育苗提供理论依据与技术途径。【方法】采用盆栽试验及高通量测序技术，对杜梨苗分别接种梨土著AM真菌层状近明球囊霉（Claroideoglomus lamellosum，Cl）和外源菌株摩西斗管囊霉（Funneliformis mosseae，Fm）、根内根孢囊霉（Rhizophagus intraradices，Ri）及蜜色无梗囊霉（Acaulospora mellea，Am），探究干旱胁迫下单接种土著、外源菌株及混合接种（Mix）处理对杜梨幼苗生长的影响，分析干旱0、3和6周Mix处理下根系及根际土AM真菌群落变化。【结果】正常水分和干旱处理下，单接种梨土著菌株Cl、外源菌株Ri及Mix处理均显著提高株高、茎粗、叶面积、叶片相对含水量，干重增加35.26%—52.20%；地上部磷、钾、钙、镁等元素吸收增强，尤其增加磷的吸收，菌根磷吸收效应最高达1.0以上，而单接种外源菌株Am效果次之，正常供水条件下Fm抑制杜梨幼苗生长。回归性分析表明，菌根生长效应和元素吸收随侵染强度的增加而增加。干旱胁迫下，接种AM真菌显著降低杜梨幼苗叶片丙二醛含量，抗氧化酶活性和脯氨酸含量均有不同程度提高。测序结果显示，与正常水分相比，干旱胁迫下杜梨幼苗根系及根际土AM真菌群落结构发生显著改变，其中外源菌株Ri均占主导，Cl、Am丰度次之，Fm丰度最低，且随干旱胁迫程度增加，根内Ri的丰度显著上升。【结论】接种不同AM真菌对杜梨幼苗具有不同的生长效应，其中梨土著菌株Cl和外源菌株Ri表现出较强的促生和抗旱能力。AM真菌群落中Ri丰度的提高是杜梨幼苗适应干旱胁迫的重要途径。

关键词: 干旱胁迫, 杜梨, 丛枝菌根真菌, 促生, 群落结构

Abstract:

【Objective】Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi play a significant role in enhancing plant growth and improving resistance to environmental stress. The aim of this study was to screen AM fungi that can withstand drought stress in pear seedlings, so as to establish a theoretical foundation and technical approach for pear mycorrhizal cultivation. 【Method】In this study, a pot experiment and high-throughput sequencing technology were employed to investigate the effects of single and mixed inoculation with indigenous AM fungi, including Claroideoglomus lamellosum (Cl), the exogenous fungus Funneliformis mosseae (Fm), Rhizophagus intraradices (Ri), and Acaulospora mellea (Am), on the growth of Pyrus betulaefolia seedlings under normal and drought conditions. The changes in the AM fungal community in the roots and rhizosphere soil of P. betulaefolia seedlings were analyzed under mixed inoculation (Mix) after 0, 3, and 6 weeks of drought treatment. 【Result】 Under normal and drought conditions, the single inoculation with Cl, Ri, and Mix significantly increased the plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, and relative water content of the leaves of pear seedlings, resulting in a dry weight increase of 35.26% to 52.20%. Additionally, the uptake of phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and magnesium in the aboveground part of the seedlings was enhanced, especially phosphorus uptake, with a mycorrhizal phosphorus uptake effect of up to 1.0. The exogenous fungus Am showed less effectiveness, while Fm inhibited the growth of P. betulaefolia seedlings under normal water supply conditions. Regression analysis indicated that the growth and element absorption effects of mycorrhizal fungi increased with the degree of infection. Under drought stress, AM fungal inoculation significantly reduced the MDA (malondialdehyde) content in the leaves of P. betulaefolia seedlings and increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes and the content of proline to varying degrees. Sequencing results demonstrated that the structure of the AM fungal community in the roots and rhizosphere soil of P. betulaefolia seedlings changed significantly under drought stress compared with normal water conditions. The exogenous fungus Ri dominated the community, followed by Cl and Am, while Fm was the least abundant. The abundance of Ri in the roots significantly increased with the degree of drought stress. 【Conclusion】In conclusion, the different AM fungi had varying effects on the growth of P. betulaefolia seedlings, with the indigenous strain Cl and the exogenous strain Ri showing strong growth-promoting effect and drought resistance. The increase in Ri abundance in the AM fungal community was an important adaptation mechanism for P. betulaefolia seedlings to withstand drought stress.

Key words: drought stress, Pyrus betulaefolia, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, growth-promoting, community structure

栗晗, 江尚焘, 彭海英, 李培根, 顾长宜, 张金莲, 陈廷速, 徐阳春, 沈其荣, 董彩霞. 接种土著和外源AM真菌对杜梨抗旱性的影响及其适应机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(1): 159-172.

LI Han, JIANG ShangTao, PENG HaiYing, LI PeiGen, GU ChangYi, ZHANG JinLian, CHEN TingSu, XU YangChun, SHEN QiRong, DONG CaiXia. Effects of Inoculation with Indigenous and Exogenous Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Drought Resistance of Pyrus betulaefolia and Its Adaptation Mechanism[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(1): 159-172.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.01.011

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2024/V57/I1/159

图/表 11

图1

图2

表1

图3

表2

图4

图5

图6

图7

表3

图8

参考文献 43

[1]	宗宇, 孙萍, 牛庆丰, 滕元文. 中国北方野生杜梨分布现状及其形态多样性评价. 果树学报, 2013, 30(6): 918-923.
	ZONG Y, SUN P, NIU Q F, TENG Y W. Distribution situation and assessment of morphological diversity of wild Pyrus betulaefolia in Northern China. Journal of Fruit Science, 2013, 30(6): 918-923. (in Chinese)
[2]	李娇娇, 曾明. 丛枝菌根对植物根际逆境的生态学意义. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(9): 3216-3226. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202009.039
	LI J J, ZENG M. Ecological significance of arbuscular mycorrhiza on plant rhizosphere stress. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(9): 3216-3226. (in Chinese)
[3]	WIPF D, KRAJINSKI F, VAN TUINEN D, RECORBET G, COURTY P E. Trading on the arbuscular mycorrhiza market: from arbuscules to common mycorrhizal networks. The New Phytologist, 2019, 223(3): 1127-1142. doi: 10.1111/nph.2019.223.issue-3
[4]	JOHNSON N C, GIBSON K S. Understanding multilevel selection may facilitate management of arbuscular mycorrhizae in sustainable agroecosystems. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 11: 627345. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.627345
[5]	YAN Q X, LI X Y, XIAO X F, CHEN J Z, LIU J M, LIN C H, GUAN R T, WANG D P. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve the growth and drought tolerance of Cinnamomum migao by enhancing physio-biochemical responses. Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 12(7): e9091.
[6]	PÜSCHEL D, BITTERLICH M, RYDLOVÁ J, JANSA J. Drought accentuates the role of mycorrhiza in phosphorus uptake. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 157: 108243. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108243
[7]	HOANG D T T, RASHTBARI M, ANH L T, WANG S, TU D T, HIEP N V, RAZAVI B S. Mutualistic interaction between arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi and soybean roots enhances drought resistant through regulating glucose exudation and rhizosphere expansion. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2022, 171: 108728. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108728
[8]	BOYER L R, BRAIN P, XU X M, JEFFRIES P. Inoculation of drought-stressed strawberry with a mixed inoculum of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Effects on population dynamics of fungal species in roots and consequential plant tolerance to water deficiency. Mycorrhiza, 2015, 25(3): 215-227. doi: 10.1007/s00572-014-0603-6 pmid: 25186649
[9]	LE PIOUFLE O, GANOUDI M, CALONNE-SALMON M, BEN DHAOU F, DECLERCK S. Rhizophagus irregularis MUCL 41833 improves phosphorus uptake and water use efficiency in maize plants during recovery from drought stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 897. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00897
[10]	ABDALLA M, ALI AHMED M. Arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis enhances water status and soil-plant hydraulic conductance under drought. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 722954. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.722954
[11]	WU Y H, WANG H, LIU M, LI B, CHEN X, MA Y T, YAN Z Y. Effects of native arbuscular mycorrhizae isolated on root biomass and secondary metabolites of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 617892. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.617892
[12]	MIDDLETON E L, RICHARDSON S, KOZIOL L, PALMER C E, YERMAKOV Z, HENNING J A, SCHULTZ P A, BEVER J D. Locally adapted arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve vigor and resistance to herbivory of native prairie plant species. Ecosphere, 2015, 6(12): 1-16.
[13]	HART M, ANTUNES P, CHAUDHARY V, ABBOTT L. Fungal inoculants in the field: Is the reward greater than the risk? Functional Ecology, 2018, 32(1): 126-135. doi: 10.1111/fec.2018.32.issue-1
[14]	JANOUŠKOVÁ M, KRAK K, VOSÁTKA M, PÜSCHEL D, ŠTORCHOVÁ H. Inoculation effects on root-colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities spread beyond directly inoculated plants. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(7): e0181525.
[15]	AGANCHICH B, WAHBI S, YAAKOUBI A, EL-AOUOUAD H, BOTA J. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on growth and physiology performance of olive trees under regulated deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying. South African Journal of Botany, 2022, 148: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2022.03.051
[16]	李侠, 叶诚诚, 张俊伶, 李海港, 王幼珊. 丛枝菌根真菌侵染指标与植物促生效应相关性分析. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(10): 41-53.
	LI X, YE C C, ZHANG J L, LI H G, WANG Y S. Correlation analysis between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization indices and plant growth promoting effect. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021, 26(10): 41-53. (in Chinese)
[17]	王思雨, 魏涵, 陈科宇, 董强, 纪宝明, 张静. 丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)孢子,菌丝密度及侵染率定量测定方法. Bio-101, 2022: 2104253.
	WANG S Y, WEI H, CHEN K Y, DONG Q, JI B M, ZHANG J. Practical methods for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spore density, hyphal density and colonization rate of AMF. Bio-101, 2022: 2104253. (in Chinese)
[18]	SCHWARZOTT D, SCHÜßLER A. A simple and reliable method for SSU rRNA gene DNA extraction, amplification, and cloning from single AM fungal spores. Mycorrhiza, 2001, 10(4): 203-207. doi: 10.1007/PL00009996
[19]	LEE J, LEE S S, YOUNG J P W. Improved PCR primers for the detection and identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2008, 65(2): 339-349. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00531.x pmid: 18631176
[20]	SIMON L, LALONDE M, BRUNS T D. Specific amplification of 18S fungal ribosomal genes from vesicular-arbuscular endomycorrhizal fungi colonizing roots. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1992, 58(1): 291-295. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.1.291-295.1992 pmid: 1339260
[21]	SATO K, SUYAMA Y, SAITO M, SUGAWARA K. A new primer for discrimination of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with polymerase chain reaction-denature gradient gel electrophoresis. Grassland Science, 2005, 51(2): 179-181. doi: 10.1111/grs.2005.51.issue-2
[22]	BABALOLA B J, LI J, WILLING C E, ZHENG Y, WANG Y L, GAN H Y, LI X C, WANG C, ADAMS C A, GAO C, GUO L D. Nitrogen fertilisation disrupts the temporal dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal hyphae but not spore density and community composition in a wheat field. The New Phytologist, 2022, 234(6): 2057-2072. doi: 10.1111/nph.v234.6
[23]	王紫瑄, 解甜甜, 王雅茹, 杨杰艳, 杨秀清. 丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)对蒙古沙冬青幼苗的促生特性及作用机制. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(1): 78-89.
	WANG Z X, XIE T T, WANG Y R, YANG J Y, YANG X Q. Growth promotion and mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on Ammopiptanthus mongolicus seedlings. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(1): 78-89. (in Chinese)
[24]	骆礼华. 金佛山方竹林AM真菌调查及接种对其苗期生长的影响[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2018.
	LUO L H. Effects of AM fungi on the growth of Chimonobambusa utilis[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2018. (in Chinese)
[25]	ZOU Y D, GAO Q, BI H Y, FAN J H. Effects of different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and protective enzyme activity of Glycyrrhiza uralensis. Medicinal Plant, 2018, 9(02): 57-60, 64.
[26]	张金莲, 陈廷速, 刘金华, 康贻豪, 李冬萍, 汪茜, 宋娟, 钟泽橙, 温云英, 高日芳, 尚鹏祥, 张锡唐, 张师音, 程通, 胡柳, 罗文新, 葛胜祥, 夏宁邵. 层状近明球囊霉菌株HTJ2-60及其应用: 中国, CN113061535B. 2022-09-30.
	ZHANG J L, CHEN T S, LIU J H, KANG Y H, LI D P, WANG Q, SONG J, ZHONG Z C, WEN Y Y, GAO R F, SHANG P X, ZHANG X T, ZHANG S Y, CHENG T, HU L, LUO W X, GE S X, XIA N C. Strain Claroideoglomus lamellosum HTJ2-60 and its application: China,CN113061535B, 2022-09-30. (in Chinese)
[27]	GUO X, WANG P, WANG X J, LI Y M, JI B M. Specific plant mycorrhizal responses are linked to mycorrhizal fungal species interactions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 930069. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.930069
[28]	BOWLES T M, JACKSON L E, CAVAGNARO T R. Mycorrhizal fungi enhance plant nutrient acquisition and modulate nitrogen loss with variable water regimes. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24(1): e171-e182.
[29]	FORCZEK S T, BUKOVSKÁ P, PÜSCHEL D, JANOUŠKOVÁ M, BLAŽKOVÁ A, JANSA J. Drought rearranges preferential carbon allocation to arbuscular mycorrhizal community members co-inhabiting roots of Medicago truncatula. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2022, 199: 104897. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104897
[30]	张淑容, 贺学礼, 徐浩博, 刘春卯, 牛凯. 蒙古沙冬青根围AM和DSE真菌与土壤因子的相关性研究. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(9): 1891-1897.
	ZHANG S R, HE X L, XU H B, LIU C M, NIU K. Correlation study of AM and DSE fungi and soil factors in the rhizosphere of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2013, 33(9): 1891-1897. (in Chinese)
[31]	PÜSCHEL D, BITTERLICH M, RYDLOVÁ J, JANSA J. Facilitation of plant water uptake by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus: A Gordian knot of roots and hyphae. Mycorrhiza, 2020, 30(2/3): 299-313. doi: 10.1007/s00572-020-00949-9
[32]	刘海跃, 李欣玫, 张琳琳, 王姣姣, 贺学礼. 西北荒漠带花棒根际丛枝菌根真菌生态地理分布. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(2): 252-260. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0138
	LIU H Y, LI X M, ZHANG L L, WANG J J, HE X L. Eco- geographical distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Hedysarum scoparium in the desert zone of northwestern China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42(2): 252-260. (in Chinese) doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0138
[33]	KAUR S, CAMPBELL B J, SUSEELA V. Root metabolome of plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis mirrors the mutualistic or parasitic mycorrhizal phenotype. The New Phytologist, 2022, 234(2): 672-687. doi: 10.1111/nph.v234.2
[34]	张亚敏, 马克明, 李芳兰, 曲来叶. 干旱胁迫条件下AMF促进小马鞍羊蹄甲幼苗生长的机理研究. 生态学报, 2016, 36(11): 3329-3337.
	ZHANG Y M, MA K M, LI F L, QU L Y. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) promotes Bauhinia faberi var. microphylla seedling growth under drought stress conditions. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(11): 3329-3337. (in Chinese)
[35]	杨玉海, 李卫红, 陈亚宁, 朱成刚, 马建新. 接种摩西球囊霉胡杨幼株对渐进式土壤水分亏缺的响应. 干旱区地理, 2015, 38(1): 60-66.
	YANG Y H, LI W H, CHEN Y N, ZHU C G, MA J X. Response of Populus euphratica seedling inoculated Glomus mosseae to progressive soil water deficit. Arid Land Geography, 2015, 38(1): 60-66. (in Chinese)
[36]	张中峰, 张金池, 黄玉清, 徐广平, 张德楠, 俞元春. 接种菌根真菌对青冈栎幼苗耐旱性的影响. 生态学报, 2016, 36(11): 3402-3410.
	ZHANG Z F, ZHANG J C, HUANG Y Q, XU G P, ZHANG D N, YU Y C. Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on the drought tolerance of Cyclobalanopsis glauca seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(11): 3402-3410. (in Chinese)
[37]	THONAR C, FROSSARD E, ŠMILAUER P, JANSA J. Competition and facilitation in synthetic communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Molecular Ecology, 2014, 23(3): 733-746. doi: 10.1111/mec.12625 pmid: 24330316
[38]	KIERS E T, DUHAMEL M, BEESETTY Y, MENSAH J A, FRANKEN O, VERBRUGGEN E, FELLBAUM C R, KOWALCHUK G A, HART M M, BAGO A, PALMER T M, WEST S A, VANDENKOORNHUYSE P, JANSA J, BÜCKING H. Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Science, 2011, 333(6044): 880-882. doi: 10.1126/science.1208473 pmid: 21836016
[39]	SYMANCZIK S, COURTY P E, BOLLER T, WIEMKEN A, AL-YAHYA’EI M N. Impact of water regimes on an experimental community of four desert arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) species, as affected by the introduction of a non-native AMF species. Mycorrhiza, 2015, 25(8): 639-647. doi: 10.1007/s00572-015-0638-3 pmid: 25860835
[40]	EMERY S M, BELL-DERESKE L, STAHLHEBER K A, GROSS K L. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community responses to drought and nitrogen fertilization in switchgrass stands. Applied Soil Ecology, 2022, 169: 104218. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104218
[41]	BLAŽKOVÁ A, JANSA J, PÜSCHEL D, VOSÁTKA M, JANOUŠKOVÁ M. Is mycorrhiza functioning influenced by the quantitative composition of the mycorrhizal fungal community? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 157: 108249. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108249
[42]	NACOON S, EKPRASERT J, RIDDECH N, MONGKOLTHANARUK W, JOGLOY S, VORASOOT N, COOPER J, BOONLUE S. Growth enhancement of sunchoke by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under drought condition. Rhizosphere, 2021, 17: 100308. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100308
[43]	PRINGLE A, BEVER J D. Divergent phenologies may facilitate the coexistence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a North Carolina grassland. American Journal of Botany, 2002, 89(9): 1439-1446. doi: 10.3732/ajb.89.9.1439

处理 Treatment		株高 Plant height (cm)	茎粗 Stem diameter (mm)	叶面积 Leaf area (cm²)	叶绿素含量 ChlorophyII content (mg∙g^-1)	干重 Dry weight (g)	叶片相对含水量 Relative water content of leaves (%)
正常 Normal	CK	8.01±1.70cd	2.75±0.26bc	126.36±4.21e	1.43±0.15bc	1.82±0.16bc	66.66±2.38bc
	Ri	20.02±3.46a	3.48±0.42a	240.21±25.10a	1.09±0.12d	2.58±0.40a	78.58±3.50a
	Fm	9.24±2.33cd	2.76±0.34bc	107.41±22.95fg	1.43±0.09bc	1.18±0.19d	80.50±7.13a
	Am	9.94±3.11cd	3.10±0.36ab	143.94±19.94d	1.36±0.09c	2.16±0.25b	76.62±5.46a
	Cl	14.48±4.24b	3.45±0.48a	230.22±6.19ab	1.40±0.07bc	2.72±0.28a	77.76±0.50a
	Mix	21.30±3.46a	3.38±0.48a	218.88±21.92b	1.28±0.04c	2.77±0.64a	78.24±7.41a
干旱 Drought	CK	6.75±1.68d	2.70±0.40bc	91.69±5.37g	1.64±0.03a	1.56±0.20c	58.09±1.02d
	Ri	14.02±2.43b	2.81±0.43bc	153.22±20.65d	1.38±0.07c	1.84±0.14bc	80.85±4.23a
	Fm	7.16±1.26cd	2.60±0.42c	103.15±17.95fg	1.43±0.08bc	1.60±0.29c	66.18±5.20c
	Am	6.75±1.70d	2.42±0.41c	72.05±8.55h	1.62±0.02a	1.59±0.32c	76.24±1.87a
	Cl	10.11±3.93c	2.85±0.23bc	121.16±2.85ef	1.55±0.07ab	2.11±0.31b	73.81±1.16ab
	Mix	14.73±3.76b	2.64±0.42c	175.72±9.66c	1.62±0.03a	2.12±0.26b	72.80±2.25abc

处理 Treatment		F (%)	M (%)	A (%)	菌丝密度 Hyphal density (cm∙g^-1)	孢子量 Spores number (g^-1 soil)
正常 Normal	Ri	100±0a	44.81±2.43b	28.71±3.22a	12.68±2.09c	11.06±1.57a
	Fm	80.56±17.35b	16.89±3.69e	6.42±1.25de	9.70±0.24c	1.53±0.12g
	Am	88.89±9.62ab	28.56±4.57d	8.93±0.34cd	12.41±2.22c	11.17±1.11a
	Cl	100±0a	18.93±1.58e	4.81±1.28ef	12.55±1.93c	9.53±0.40b
	Mix	100±0a	47.62±2.30b	16.12±1.05b	23.24±0.52b	6.33±1.29c
干旱 Drought	Ri	100±0a	54.28±1.89a	14.24±2.06b	21.10±3.36b	2.57±0.51fg
	Fm	100±0a	20.45±2.85e	5.76±1.57ef	21.24±1.37b	3.47±0.23ef
	Am	80.55±4.81b	26.97±2.03d	3.17±0.39f	16.98±1.51c	2.23±0.45fg
	Cl	100±0a	35.32±4.69c	16.70±2.15b	21.96±2.01b	4.33±0.23de
	Mix	100±0a	47.75±1.38b	10.41±0.52c	31.53±2.01a	5.60±1.40cd

		Ri		Fm		Am		Cl
		F值 F value	P值 P value	F值 F value	P值 P value	F值 F value	P值 P value	F值 F value	P值 P value
根系 Root	处理 Treatment	10.312	0.012*	1.173	0.310	1.197	0.306	7.633	0.025*
	时间 Time	4.728	0.061	1.230	0.300	2.361	0.163	5.201	0.052
	处理×时间 Treatment × Time	2.327	0.166	1.173	0.310	3.623	0.093	1.143	0.361
根际土 Rhizosphere soil	处理 Treatment	94.245	0.000***	0.333	0.580	3.045	0.119	20.335	0.002**
	时间 Time	6.768	0.032*	0.333	0.580	6.899	0.030*	286.066	0.237
	处理×时间 Treatment × Time	3.226	0.110	0.333	0.580	0.325	0.584	3.477	0.099