Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (14): 2744-2754.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.14.004

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY·AGRICULTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Row Spacing and Seeding Rate on Growth and Forage Yield of Elymus Sibiricus and Comprehensive Analysis in Alpine Region

LIU QiLin1,2(), WANG XiaoJun1, WANG JinLan2, LIU WenHui1, MA JinXiu3, LI ERenCuo4, LI Wen1()   

  1. 1 Qinghai Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine/Qinghai Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine/Key Laboratory of Superior Forage Germplasm in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Xining 810016
    2 State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University, Xining 810016
    3 Qinghai Xuefeng Yak Dairy Industry Company Limited, Gonghe 811800, Qinghai
    4 Qinghai Province Sanjiang Technology Company Limited, Xining 810016
  • Received:2024-01-25 Accepted:2024-04-21 Online:2024-07-16 Published:2024-07-24
  • Contact: LI Wen

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study aimed to investigate the effects of row spacing and seeding rate on forage yield of Elymus sibiricus (E. sibiricus) in alpine region, further to screen out the optimum planting row spacing and seeding rate for forage production of E. sibiricus in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and to reveal the influence process and path coefficient of planting row spacing and seeding rate on forage yield of E. sibiricus, and hence, so as to provide the data support for efficient forage production in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. 【Method】 In this study, E. sibiricus cv. Qingmu No. 1 and E. sibiricus cv. Qingmu No. 2 were selected as experimental material, and the two-factor split zone experimental design was adopted. Three row spacings were set as the main factors, including R1: 15 cm, R2: 30 cm, and R3: 45 cm, respectively, and three seeding rates (S1: 15.0 kg·hm-2, S2: 22.5 kg·hm-2, and S3: 30.0 kg·hm-2) were used as secondary factors. And thus, there were 9 treatments, 3 repetitions, 27 plots of each variety, and a total of 54 plots with each area 15 m2(3 m ×5 m), which was carried out in Gonghe County, Qinghai Province in 2022-2023. Random block arrangement was used to analyze the effects of different row spacings and seeding rates on growth character, forage yield and economic benefit of E. sibiricus, and the structural equation model was performed to study the influence process of row spacing and seeding rate on forage yield of E. sibiricus and its path coefficient. 【Result】 Both row spacing and seeding rate had significant effects on stem diameter, tillers, fertile tillers per, stem-leaf ratio and forage yield of Qingmu No. 1 and Qingmu No. 2. Under the same row spacing, the plant height and stem diameter of Qingmu No. 1 and Qingmu No. 2 decreased with the increasing of seeding rates, tillers and fertile tillers increased first and then decreased with the increasing of seeding rates. Under the same seeding rates, the plant height, stem diameter and dry- fresh ratio of Qingmu No. 1 and Qingmu No. 2 increased with the increasing of row spacing, and the tillers and fertile tillers decreased with the increasing of row spacing. Hence, the row spacing was 15 cm and the seeding rate was 22.5 kg·hm-2, the forage yield and economic benefit of Qingmu No. 1 and Qingmu No. 2 were the highest, the forage yield of Qingmu No.1 was 12 668.16 kg·hm-2, and the economic benefit was 13 731.97 yuan·hm-2. The forage yield of Qingmu No. 2 was 12 180.94 kg·hm-2, and the economic benefit was 13 064.03 yuan·hm-2. Pearson correlation analysis showed that forage yield was positively correlated with tillers and fertile tillers. The structural equation model showed that tillering was the primary driving factor for improving the forage yield of E. sibiricus under row spacing and seeding rate. 【Conclusion】 The comprehensive evaluation of TOPSIS model showed that the row spacing was 15 cm and the seeding rate was 22.5 kg·hm-2, which could not only maintain higher forage yield, but also significantly improve economic benefits, so it was the best row spacing and seeding rate amount, which was suitable for the forage production of E. sibiricus in chernozem of alpine region.

Key words: Elymus sibiricus, row spacing, seeding rate, forage yield, economic benefits

Fig. 1

Distribution of monthly average temperature and precipitation at the experimental site from June 2022 to July 2023"

Fig. 2

Effects of row spacing and seeding rate on agronomic traits of E. Sibiricus Small letters in the figure indicate significant differences between different seeding treatments at the same line space level (P<0.05), and capital letters indicate significant differences between different row spacing and seeding rate. 1: E. sibiricus cv. Qingmu No. 1, 2: E. sibiricus cv. Qingmu No. 2. The same as below"

Table 2

Two-factor variance analysis of effects of row spacing and seeding rate on agronomic traits of E. sibiricus"

处理
Treatment
青牧1号老芒麦
E. sibiricus cv. Qingmu No. 1
青牧2号老芒麦
E. sibiricus cv. Qingmu No. 2
F P F P
株高
Plant height
行距 Row 0.576 0.563 4.680 0.011
播种量 Seeding 11.447 0.000 8.560 0.000
行距×播种量 Row×Seeding 0.131 0.971 1.360 0.253
茎粗
Stem diameter
行距 Row 11.767 0.000 129.360 0.000
播种量 Seeding 7.884 0.001 353.500 0.000
行距×播种量 Row×Seeding 0.267 0.898 55.040 0.000
分蘖数
Tillers
行距 Row 312.850 0.000 221.830 0.000
播种量 Seeding 12.280 0.000 13.290 0.000
行距×播种量 Row×Seeding 2.450 0.083 1.420 0.268
生殖枝数
Fertile tillers per
行距 Row 75.100 0.000 875.910 0.000
播种量 Seeding 13.190 0.000 20.460 0.000
行距×播种量 Row×Seeding 3.280 0.034 1.940 0.148
茎叶比
Stem-leaf ratio
行距 Row 7.298 0.001 806.940 0.000
播种量 Seeding 9.259 0.000 40.040 0.000
行距×播种量 Row×Seeding 0.073 0.990 7.700 0.000
干鲜比
Dry-fresh ratio
行距 Row 11.780 0.000 19.840 0.000
播种量 Seeding 2.993 0.053 3.160 0.045
行距×播种量 Row×Seeding 0.225 0.924 1.150 0.333
饲草产量
Forage yield
行距 Row 31.402 0.000 19.490 0.000
播种量 Seeding 17.310 0.000 12.140 0.000
行距×播种量 Row×Seeding 0.261 0.899 1.870 0.159

Fig. 3

Effects of row spacing and seeding rate on forage yield and economic benefit of E. sibiricus"

Fig. 4

Comprehensive evaluation of different row spacings and seeding rates of E. sibiricus"

Fig. 5

Pearson correlation among forage yield and agronomic traits of E. sibiricus"

Fig. 6

Structural equation model to analyze the effects of row spacing and seeding rate on forage yield of E. sibiricus (a) and standardized effect sizes for each impact factor (b) Solid and dashed arrows represent significantly positive or negative effects at the 0.05 level, respectively. The significant standard path coefficients were shown on arrows. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. "

[1]
刘文敏, 胡国铮, 李月梅, 高清竹, 干珠扎布, 乌日罕, 余沛东, 李铭杰. 青藏高原耕地生态资产质量时空动态. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(12): 1079-1090.
LIU W M, HU G Z, LI Y M, GAO Q Z, GAN Z Z B, WU R H, YU P D, LI M J. Spatiotemporal dynamics of farmland ecological assets quality in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2023, 44(12): 1079-1090. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2023.12.001
[2]
CAO Y N, WU J S, ZHANG X Z, NIU B, LI M, ZHANG Y J, WANG X T, WANG Z P. Dynamic forage-livestock balance analysis in alpine grasslands on the Northern Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 238: 352-359.

doi: S0301-4797(19)30300-7 pmid: 30856595
[3]
莫兴国, 刘文, 孟铖铖, 胡实, 刘苏峡, 林忠辉. 青藏高原草地产量与草畜平衡变化. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2415-2425.

doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.002
MO X G, LIU W, MENG C C, HU S, LIU S X, LIN Z H. Variations of forage yield and forage-livestock balance in grasslands over the Tibetan Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(7): 2415-2425. (in Chinese)
[4]
武胜男, 张曦, 高晓霞, 许驭丹, 吴晓慧, 单席凯, 刘世梁, 董全民, 董世魁, 温璐. 三江源区“黑土滩” 型退化草地人工恢复植物群落的演替动态. 生态学报, 2019, 39(7): 2444-2453.
WU S N, ZHANG X, GAO X X, XU Y D, WU X H, SHAN X K, LIU S L, DONG Q M, DONG S K, WEN L. Succession dynamics of a plant community of degraded alpine meadow during the human- induced restoration process in the Three Rivers Source Region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(7): 2444-2453. (in Chinese)
[5]
LI W, WANG J L, ZHANG X J, SHI S L, CAO W X. Effect of degradation and rebuilding of artificial grasslands on soil respiration and carbon and nitrogen pools on an alpine meadow of the Qinghai- Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Engineering, 2018, 111: 134-142.
[6]
CHEN X P, ZHANG T, GUO R Y, LI H Y, ZHANG R, DEGEN A A, HUANG K W, WANG X M, BAI Y F, SHANG Z H. Fencing enclosure alters nitrogen distribution patterns and tradeoff strategies in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Catena, 2021, 197: 104948.
[7]
贺福全, 李奇, 陈懂懂, 赵新全, 罗彩云, 许茜, 陈昕, 赵亮, 丁生祥, 赵金忠. 三江源农牧交错区一个种植周期的垂穗披碱草人工草地CO2通量变化特征. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(5): 918-929.

doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2019.05.008
HE F Q, LI Q, CHEN D D, ZHAO X Q, LUO C Y, XU Q, CHEN X, ZHAO L, DING S X, ZHAO J Z. Variation characteristics of CO2 fluxes of Elymus nutans artificial grassland for a planting cycle in agro-pastoral transition area of Sanjiangyuan. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 28(5): 918-929. (in Chinese)
[8]
RAI M K. Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism marker in plant genome analysis: current status and prospects. Planta, 2023, 257(2): 34.
[9]
高子涵, 雷映霞, 周青平. 广义披碱草属及其近缘属植物的分子系统学研究现状. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(2): 107-115.
GAO Z H, LEI Y X, ZHOU Q P. Research progress of molecular systematics of Elymus and its related genera. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(2): 107-115. (in Chinese)
[10]
肖继兵, 刘志, 孔凡信, 辛宗绪, 吴宏生. 种植方式和密度对高粱群体结构和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(22): 4264-4276. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.22.005.
XIAO J B, LIU Z, KONG F X, XIN Z X, WU H S. Effects of planting pattern and density on population structure and yield of Sorghum. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(22): 4264-4276. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.22.005. (in Chinese)
[11]
游明鸿, 刘金平, 白史且, 张新全, 李达旭. 行距对“川草2号”老芒麦生殖枝及种子产量性状的影响. 草业学报, 2011, 20(6): 299-304.
YOU M H, LIU J P, BAI S Q, ZHANG X Q, LI D X. Influences of row spacing on fertile tillers and characters of seed yield of Elymus sibiricus cv. Chuancao No.2. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(6): 299-304. (in Chinese)
[12]
刘金平, 游明鸿, 白史且. 行距对老芒麦种群构件组成、生物量结构及能量分配的影响. 草业学报, 2012, 21(3): 69-74.
LIU J P, YOU M H, BAI S Q. Effect of row space on population component composition, biomass structure and energy distribution of Elymus sibiricus. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(3): 69-74. (in Chinese)
[13]
彭艳, 孙晶远, 马素洁, 王向涛, 孙磊, 魏学红. 氮磷添加对藏北人工牧草生产性能和品质的评价. 草业学报, 2021, 30(5): 52-64.

doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020202
PENG Y, SUN J Y, MA S J, WANG X T, SUN L, WEI X H. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on production performance and nutritive value of pasture species in Northern Tibet. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 52-64. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020202
[14]
宋建超, 杨航, 鱼小军, 魏孔涛, 张小娟, 汪海波, 贺有龙. 氮磷肥配施对高寒区垂穗披碱草饲草产量及营养品质的影响. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 731-742.

doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.03.026
SONG J C, YANG H, YU X J, WEI K T, ZHANG X J, WANG H B, HE Y L. Effect of combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on the forage yield and nutritional quality of Elymus nutans in alpine region. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(3): 731-742. (in Chinese)
[15]
吴瑞, 刘文辉, 张永超, 刘敏洁. 老芒麦离区形态特征及生理特性差异研究. 草业学报, 2022, 31(4): 81-92.

doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021045
WU R, LIU W H, ZHANG Y C, LIU M J. Differences in morphological and physiological characteristics in the abscission zone of shattering-prone and shattering-resistant genotypes of Elymus sibiricus. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 81-92. (in Chinese)
[16]
王旭成, 王星, 王琴, 宋文学, 王通锐, 黄淑迪, 王志远, 伏兵哲, 高雪芹. 行距和播量对沙芦草种子产量及其构成因子的影响. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2882-2889.

doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.09.034
WANG X C, WANG X, WANG Q, SONG W X, WANG T R, HUANG S D, WANG Z Y, FU B Z, GAO X Q. Effects of row spacing and seeding rate on seed yield and its components of Agropyron mongolicum. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(9): 2882-2889. (in Chinese)
[17]
华铣泽, 刘颖, 马玉寿, 王彦龙. 行距和播种量配置对‘青海’草地早熟禾产量和生长特性的影响. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2220-2231.

doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.07.034
HUA X Z, LIU Y, MA Y S, WANG Y L. Yield and growth characteristics response to row spacing and sowing rate in Poa pratensis L. ‘Qinghai’. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2220-2231. (in Chinese)
[18]
王琴, 李小云, 王旭成, 宋文学, 王星, 王晶, 李满有, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 宁夏干旱区行距与播量对无芒雀麦种子产量和质量的影响. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2505-2513.

doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.09.033
WANG Q, LI X Y, WANG X C, SONG W X, WANG X, WANG J, LI M Y, GAO X Q, FU B Z. Effects of row spacing and sowing rate on seed yield and quality of Bromus inermis in arid area of Ningxia. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2505-2513. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.09.033
[19]
刘凯强, 刘文辉, 贾志锋, 魏小星, 梁国玲, 马祥. 不同播量、行距及播种方式对青燕1号燕麦饲草产量的影响. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 1060-1067.

doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.04.034
LIU K Q, LIU W H, JIA Z F, WEI X X, LIANG G L, MA X. Effects of different sowing amount, row spacing and sowing methods on forage yield of Avena sativa cv.Qingyan No.1. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(4): 1060-1067. (in Chinese)
[20]
王劲松, 董二伟, 刘秋霞, 武爱莲, 王媛, 王立革, 焦晓燕. 行距和密度对籽粒饲用高粱产量和品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(16): 3123-3133. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.16.005.
WANG J S, DONG E W, LIU Q X, WU A L, WANG Y, WANG L G, JIAO X Y. Effects of row spacing and plant density on grain yield and quality of grain-feeding Sorghum. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3123-3133. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.16.005. (in Chinese)
[21]
YANG W J, LIU W J, LI Y L, WANG S W, YIN L N, DENG X P. Increasing rainfed wheat yield by optimizing agronomic practices to consume more subsoil water in the Loess Plateau. The Crop Journal, 2021, 9(6): 1418-1427.
[22]
GUO J, THAPA S, VOIGT T, OWENS V, BOE A, LEE D K. Biomass yield and feedstock quality of prairie cordgrass in response to seeding rate, row spacing, and nitrogen fertilization. Agronomy Journal, 2017, 109(6): 2474-2485.
[23]
游明鸿, 刘金平, 白史且, 李达旭, 鄢家俊, 张昌兵. 行距与栽培年限对老芒麦鲜草及种子产量的影响. 草业科学, 2012, 29(8): 1278-1284.
YOU M H, LIU J P, BAI S Q, LI D X, YAN J J, ZHANG C B. Influence of row spaces and planting years on yield of fresh grass and seeds of Elymus sibiricus. Pratacultural Science, 2012, 29(8): 1278-1284. (in Chinese)
[24]
王斌, 杨雨琦, 李满有, 倪旺, 海艺蕊, 张顺香, 董秀, 兰剑. 不同播种量下行距配置对紫花苜蓿产量及品质的影响. 草业学报, 2022, 31(2): 147-158.

doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021236
WANG B, YANG Y Q, LI M Y, NI W, HAI Y R, ZHANG S X, DONG X, LAN J The effect of sowing rate and row spacing on the yield and quality of alfalfa in the Ningxia Yellow River irrigation area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(2): 147-158. (in Chinese)

doi: 10.11686/cyxb2021236
[25]
雷新慧, 吴怡欣, 王家乐, 陶金才, 万晨茜, 王孟, 高小丽, 冯佰利, 高金锋. 种植密度与施肥水平对甜荞光合特性、产量及抗倒伏的影响. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(2):264-277. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.02.004.
LEI X H, WU Y X, WANG J L, TAO J C, WAN C X, WANG M, GAO X L, FENG B L, GAO J F. Effects of planting density and fertilization level on photosynthesis, yield and lodging resistance of common buckwheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(2):264-277. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.02.004. (in Chinese)
[26]
韩云华, 王显国, 呼天明, 朱振磊, 王正伟, 王莹, 崔志明, 石金惠. 行距对牧草型高羊茅种子产量和产量因子的影响. 草地学报, 2014, 22(1): 139-144.

doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.01.022
HAN Y H, WANG X G, HU T M, ZHU Z L, WANG Z W, WANG Y, CUI Z M, SHI J H. Effects of row spacing on forage-type tall fescue seed yield and yield components. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(1): 139-144. (in Chinese)
[27]
段媛媛, 王淳忆, 张曹莉, 郭富康, 郭正刚. 植株密度和氮素互作对垂穗披碱草生物量分配的影响. 生态学报, 2021, 41(24): 9815-9823.
DUAN Y Y, WANG C Y, ZHANG C L, GUO F K, GUO Z G. Effects of interaction between plant density and nitrogen application rate on allocation of above/underground biomass of Elymus nutans. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(24): 9815-9823. (in Chinese)
[28]
MULVANEY M J, LEON R G, SEEPAUL R, WRIGHT D L, HOFFMAN T L. Brassica carinata seeding rate and row spacing effects on morphology, yield, and oil. Agronomy Journal, 2019, 111(2): 528-535.
[29]
王玲玲, 库努都孜阿依·吐鲁洪, 孟广飞, 郭正刚. 土壤水分和植株密度互作对垂穗披碱草地下营养繁殖及生物量的影响. 草业学报, 2021, 30(11): 52-61.

doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020424
WANG L L, TURGUN K, MENG G F, GUO Z G. Effect of soil moisture and plant density on vegetative propagation traits and biomass of Elymus nutans. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(11): 52-61. (in Chinese)
[30]
张永亮, 张浩. 行距与氮肥对虉草分蘖和产量的影响. 中国草地学报, 2013, 35(2): 43-47.
ZHANG Y L, ZHANG H. Effect of row spacing and nitrogen fertilizer application on tillers and yield of Phalaris arundinacea. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2013, 35(2): 43-47. (in Chinese)
[31]
KOERITZ E J, WATKINS E, EHLKE N J. Seeding rate, row spacing, and nitrogen rate effects on perennial ryegrass seed production. Crop Science, 2015, 55(5): 2319-2333.
[32]
GESCH R W, KIM K I, FORCELLA F. Influence of seeding rate and row spacing on cuphea seed yield in the Northern Corn Belt. Industrial Crops and Products, 2010, 32(3): 692-695.
[33]
王玲秀, 娄亚桦, 邵帅. 种植密度对东方旱麦草生长与品质的影响. 草业科学, 2022, 39(3): 503-510.
WANG L X, LOU Y H, SHAO S. Effects of planting density on the growth and quality of Eremopyrum orientale. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(3): 503-510. (in Chinese)
[1] DONG KuiJun, ZHANG YiTao, LIU HanWen, ZHANG JiZong, WANG WeiJun, WEN YanChen, LEI QiuLiang, WEN HongDa. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Application of Summer Maize- Soybean Intercropping on Agronomic Traits and Economic Benefits as well as Its Yield of Subsequent Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(22): 4495-4506.
[2] QIN Feng, WANG XiaoFei, WU Zhen, HU YiBo, WANG XiaoQin, ZHANG JiaWei, CAI Tie. Effects of Planting Density and Row Spacing Configuration on Sugar Accumulation and Lodging Performance of Wheat Stem Under Rainfall Harvesting Planting Mode [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(1): 65-79.
[3] CHANG JiaYue, MA XiaoLong, WU YanLi, LI JianMing. Effects of Row Spacing and Irrigation Amount on Canopy Light Interception and Photosynthetic Capacity, Matter Accumulation and Fruit Quality of Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(11): 2141-2157.
[4] WANG JinSong,DONG ErWei,LIU QiuXia,WU AiLian,WANG Yuan,WANG LiGe,JIAO XiaoYan. Effects of Row Spacing and Plant Density on Grain Yield and Quality of Grain-Feeding Sorghum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3123-3133.
[5] KUAI Jie, LI Zhen, WANG Bo, LIU Fang, YE Jun, ZHOU GuangSheng. Effects of Density and Row Spacing on Seedling Traits of Rapeseed and Seed Yield [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2319-2332.
[6] LI YongHua,WU XuePing,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui. Benefits of Yield, Environment and Economy from Substituting Fertilizer by Manure for Wheat Production of China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(23): 4879-4890.
[7] BAI Jing,ZHANG ChunYu,DING XiangPeng,ZHANG JiWang,LIU Peng,REN BaiZhao,ZHAO Bin. Effects of Row Spacing and Mulching Reflective Film on the Yield and Light Utilization of Summer Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(19): 3942-3953.
[8] ZHANG XueMei,MA QianHu,ZHANG ZiLong,WANG ZiKui,YANG HuiMin,SHEN YuYing. Effects of Fertilization Rate on Forage Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Artificial Grassland in an Alpine Arid Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(8): 1368-1379.
[9] PANG Ting,CHEN Ping,YUAN XiaoTing,LEI Lu,DU Qing,FU ZhiDan,ZHANG XiaoNa,ZHOU Ying,REN JianRui,WANG Tian,WANG Jin,YANG WenYu,YONG TaiWen. Effects of Row Spacing on Dry Matter Accumulation, Grain Filling and Yield Formation of Different Nodulation Characteristic Soybeans in Intercropping [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(21): 3751-3762.
[10] WU XuanYi, CAO HongXia, WANG HuBing, HAO ShuXue. Effect of Planting Row Spacing and Irrigation Amount on Comprehensive Quality of Short-Season Cultivation Tomato in Solar Greenhouse in Northwest China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(5): 940-951.
[11] XUE LingZhu, SUN Min, GAO ZhiQiang, WANG PeiRu, REN AiXia, LEI MiaoMiao, YANG ZhenPing. Effects of Incremental Seeding Rate Under Sub-Soiling During the Fallow Period on Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization, Yield and Grain Protein Content in Dryland Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(13): 2451-2462.
[12] YU ShuTing, ZHAO YaLi, WANG YuHong, LIU WeiLing, MENG ZhanYing, MU XinYuan, CHENG SiXian, LI ChaoHai. Improvement Effects of Rotational Tillage Patterns on Soil in the Winter Wheat-Summer Maize Double Cropping Area of Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(11): 2150-2165.
[13] XU Min-1, 2 , MA Xu-Zhou-1, WANG Wu-1. Effects of Different Cultivation Patterns on Rice Yield and Crab in Rice-Crab Culture System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(9): 1828-1835.
[14] TANG Qiu-Xiang, LIU Hong-Bin, LEI Bao-Kun, DI Li-Mei, HU Wan-Li, LUO Xin-Hua, ZHANG Ji-Zong, REN Tian-Zhi. Screening of Environment-friendly Cropping Mode in the Northern Region of Erhai Lake [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(12): 2375-2383.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!