Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (15): 3018-3028.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.15.012

• HORTICULTURE • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of Brown Rot Resistance in Peach Based on Genetic Resources Conserved in National Germplasm Repository of Peach in Nanjing

SHEN ZhiJun1(),TIAN Yu2,CAI ZhiXiang(),XU ZiYuan1,YAN Juan1,SUN Meng1,MA RuiJuan1,YU MingLiang1   

  1. 1Fruit Tree Research Institute of Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement, Nanjing 210014
    2Nanjing Liuhe Secondary Vocational School, Nanjing 211500
    3College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu
  • Received:2021-11-13 Accepted:2022-01-21 Online:2022-08-01 Published:2022-08-02
  • Contact: ZhiXiang CAI E-mail:shenjaas@aliyun.com;mly1008@aliyun.com

RichHTML

32

PDF

141

Supplement

1

Abstract:

【Objective】 The brown rot is one of the most serious diseases in peach throughout the world and usually causes huge economic losses during the peach harvest and storage stages. The systematic evaluation on brown rot resistance of peach germplasm resources and screening of resistant resources were performed for developing new peach cultivars with high resistance to brown rot, and finally solving the problem in peach cultivation.【Method】 The commercially matured peaches with 8.0-8.5 maturity degree from National Germplasm Repository of Peach in Nanjing were inoculated by Monilinia spore during 2018-2021. Altogether, 616 accessions were evaluated by uninjured inoculation, and 505 accessions by injured inoculation. The percentage growth of infected fruits per day (PGIF, %) and lesion diameter growth rate (LDGR, cm∙d-1) were used to evaluate brown rot resistance, and then a nine-grade evaluation method was established based on the average value of PGIF and LDGR with 0.5 standard deviation, respectively. The brown rot resistance was compared among different germplasm types, fruit types and origins, and the correlation between brown rot resistance and other characteristics were also investigated. 【Result】 PGIF was (11.22±5.96)% with the CV value of 35.48 for the samples with uninjured inoculation. Based on the nine-grade resistance evaluation method by PGIF, the accession with Grade 1 (PGIF<0.80%) was not available, ten accessions with Grade 2 (0.80%-3.78%), 134 accessions with Grade 3 (3.78%-6.76%), 157 accessions with Grade 4 (6.76%-9.73%), 122 accessions with Grade 5 (9.73%-12.71%), 73 accessions with Grade 6 (12.71%-15.68%), 60 accessions with Grade 7 (15.68%-18.66%), 21 accessions with Grade 8 (18.66%-21.64%), and 39 accessions with Grade 9 (>21.64%). LDGR was (1.71±0.21) cm∙d-1 with the CV value of 0.18, and there were 11 accessions with Grade1 (LDGR<0.98 cm∙d-1), 28 accessions with Grade 2 (0.98-1.19 cm∙d-1), 72 accessions with Grade 3 (1.19-1.40 cm∙d-1), 109 accessions with Grade 4 (1.40-1.61 cm∙d-1), 103 accessions with Grade 5 (1.61-1.83 cm∙d-1), 82 accessions with Grade 6 (1.83-2.04 cm∙d-1), 45 accessions with Grade 7 (2.04-2.25 cm∙d-1), 29 accessions with Grade 8 (2.25-2.46 cm∙d-1), and 26 accessions with Grade 9 (>2.46 cm∙d-1) according to the nine-grade resistance evaluation method by LDGR. The linear regression of PGIF (y) to LDGR (x) was y=6.2073x, with a low R2 value of 0.1839. The comparison of brown rot resistance among different groups showed that the wild peach resources originated from China had more resistance to brown rot relative to those from other areas, and the wild resources would be very valuable for peach brown rot resistance breeding in the near future. PGIF and LDGR were significantly negatively correlated with both fruit firmness with exocarp (-0.234) and without exocarp (-0.240), and significantly positively with fruit size (0.427) and degree of coloring (0.319), but the correlation coefficient was relatively low. 【Conclusion】 A nine-grade evaluation system for peach brown rot resistance was established based on percentage growth of infected fruits per day (%) and lesion diameter growth rate (cm∙d-1), respectively. In addition, 10 peach germplasm resources with high resistance to infestation by peach brown rot and 11 with high anti-expansion capacity against peach brown rot were screened in this study.

Key words: peach, germplasm resources, brown rot, evaluation system, resistant germplasm

Table 1

Accession numbers evaluated for resistance to brown rot from 2018 to 2021"

接种方式 Inoculation type 2018 2019 2020 2021 合计 Total
无损接种Inoculation without injury 119 288 333 282 616
有损接种Inoculation with injury 115 183 277 233 505

Fig. 1

Interval distribution of percentage growth of infected fruits per day (PGIF) based on 616 accessions"

Fig. 2

Interval distribution of lesion diameter growth rate (LDGR) based on 505 accessions"

Fig. 3

Scatter plot and linear regression of PGIF inoculated without injury (%) and LDGR inoculated with injury (cm∙d-1)"

Fig. 4

Comparison of brown rot resistance among different types of peach germplasm Subgraphs from A to C were classified by germplasm type, origination, fruit type, respectively. Subgraphs 1 and 2 were percentage growth of infected fruits per day (PGIF, %) and lesion diameter growth rate (LDGR, cm∙d-1), respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (P<0.05)"

Table 2

Correlations of Lesion diameter growth rate and Infected fruits growth rate with other quantitative traits"

评价指标
Evaluation item		 统计参数
Statistical parameters		 带皮硬度
Firmness with exocarp		 去皮硬度
Firmness without exocarp		 单果重
Fruit weight		 着色程度
Degree of
coloration		 病斑扩展速率
Lesion diameter growth rate
病斑扩展速率 LDGR 相关系数r -0.234** -0.240** 0.427** 0.319** 1
样本数 n 505 505 505 505 505
病果率每天增加百分比PGIF 相关系数r -0.188** -0.140** 0.271** 0.244** 0.431**
样本数 n 616 616 616 616 505
[1] BADENES M L, BYRNE D. Fruit Breeding. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 2011: 526-609.
[2] MARTINI C, MARI M. Monilinia fructicola, Monilinia laxa (Monilinia rot, brown rot)//Postharvest Decay, Control Strategies. London: Academic Press Elsevier, 2014: 233-265.
[3] EGÜEN B, MELGAREJO P, CAL A. Sensitivity of Monilinia fructicola from Spanish peach orchards to thiophanate-methyl, iprodione, and cyproconazole: Fitness analysis and competitiveness. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2015, 141(4): 789-801. doi: 10.1007/s10658-014-0579-2.
doi: 10.1007/s10658-014-0579-2
[4] ZHU X Q, CHEN X Y, GUO L Y. Population structure of brown rot fungi on stone fruits in China. Plant Disease, 2011, 95(10): 1284-1291. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-11-0079.
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-11-0079
[5] YIN L F, CHEN S N, YUAN N N, ZHAI L X. First report of peach brown rot caused by Monilinia fructicola in central and Western China. Plant Disease, 2013, 97(9): 1255.
[6] LAYNE DR, BASSI D. The Peach: Botany, production and uses. Wallingford: CAB International, 2008.
[7] OBI V I, BARRIUSO J J, GOGORCENA Y. Peach brown rot: Still in search of an ideal management option. Agriculture, 2018, 8(8): 125.
doi: 10.3390/agriculture8080125
[8] OBI V I, BARRIUSO J J, USALL J, GOGORCENA Y. Breeding strategies for identifying superior peach genotypes resistant to brown rot. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 246: 1028-1036.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.027
[9] 管方念, 龙黎, 姚方杰, 王昱琦, 江千涛, 康厚扬, 蒋云峰, 李伟, 邓梅, 李豪, 陈国跃. 152份黄淮海麦区小麦农家品种抗条锈性评价及重要条锈病抗性基因的分子检测. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(18): 3629-3637. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.18.001.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.18.001
GUAN F N, LONG L, YAO F J, WANG Y Q, JIANG Q T, KANG H Y, JIANG Y F, LI W, DENG M, LI H, CHEN G Y. Evaluation of resistance to stripe rust and molecular detection of important known yr gene(s) of 152 Chinese wheat landraces from the Huang-Huai-Hai. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(18): 3629-3637. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.18.001. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.18.001
[10] ZHU X Q, CHEN X Y, LUO Y, GUO L Y. First report of Monilinia fructicola on peach and nectarine in China. Plant Pathology, 2005, 54(4): 575.
[11] HU M J, CHEN Y, CHEN S N, LIU X L, YIN LF, LUO C X. First report of brown rot of peach caused by Monilinia fructicola in southeastern China. Plant Disease, 2011, 95(2): 225.
[12] FAN J Y, GUO L Y, XU J P, LUO Y, MICHAILIDES T J. Genetic diversity of populations of Monilinia fructicola (Fungi, Ascomycota, Helotiales) from China. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 2010, 57(2): 206-212.
doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00467.x
[13] DURAK M R, ARSLAN K, SILAN E, YILDIZ G, OZKILINC H. A novel approach for in vitro fungicide screening and the sensitivity of Monilinia populations from peach orchards in Turkey to respiratory inhibitor fungicides. Crop Protection, 2021, 147: 105688.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105688
[14] MALANDRAKIS A A, KAVROULAKIS N, CHRYSIKOPOULOS C V. Copper nanoparticles against benzimidazole-resistant Monilinia fructicola field isolates. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2021, 173: 104796. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.104796.
doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.104796
[15] HOU D Y, YAN C Q, LIU H X, GE X Z, XU W J, TIAN P F. Berberine as a natural compound inhibits the development of brown rot fungus Monilinia fructicola. Crop Protection, 2010, 29: 979-984.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2010.05.015
[16] MA Z X, YANG L Y, YAN H X, KENNEDY J F, MENG X H. Chitosan and oligochitosan enhance the resistance of peach fruit to brown rot. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2013, 94(1): 272-277. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.012.
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.012
[17] KHUMALO K N, TINYANE P, SOUNDY PUFFY, ROMANAZZI G, GLOWACZ M, SIVAKUMAR D. Effect of thyme oil vapour exposure on the brown rot infection, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity, phenolic content and antioxidant activity in red and yellow skin peach cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 2017, 214: 195-199.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.11.044
[18] FU W H, TIAN G R, PEI Q H, GE X Z, TIAN P F. Evaluation of berberine as a natural compound to inhibit peach brown rot pathogen Monilinia fructicola. Crop Protection, 2017, 91: 20-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2016.09.008
[19] DEL CUETO J, KOSINSKA-CAGNAZZO A, STEFANI P, HERITIER J, ROCH G, OBERHANSLI T, AUDERGON J M, CHRISTEN D. Phenolic compounds identified in apricot branch tissues and their role in the control of Monilinia laxa growth. Scientia Horticulturae. 2021, 275: 109707.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109707
[20] JIANG S, ZHAO T T, WEI Y Y, CAO Z D, XU Y Y, WEI J Y, FENG XU F, WANG H F, SHAO X F. Preparation and characterization of tea tree oil/hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex and its application to control brown rot in peach fruit. Food Hydrocolloids, 2021, 121: 107037.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107037
[21] 贾祥子, 叶建, 王诚, 熊正文, 孔祥伟, 张清霞, 纪兆林. 桃褐腐病生防细菌JY-d1种类鉴定及其对桃褐腐病菌生防机制研究. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2021, 42(4): 128-134. doi: 10.16872/j.cnki.1671-4652.2021.04.022.
doi: 10.16872/j.cnki.1671-4652.2021.04.022
JIA X Z, YE J, WANG C, XIONG Z W, KONG X W, ZHANG Q X, JI Z L. Identification of biocontrol agent JY-d1 and biological control mechanism of this bacterium against peach fruit brown rot pathogen Monilinia fructicola. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 2021, 42(4): 128-134. doi: 10.16872/j.cnki.1671-4652.2021.04.022. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.16872/j.cnki.1671-4652.2021.04.022
[22] 侯旭, 张国庆, 胡晓, 刘悦萍. 桃褐腐病菌拮抗性内生细菌的筛选及其抑病效果. 微生物学通报, 2017, 44(8): 1874-1881. doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.160860.
doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.160860
HOU X, ZHANG G Q, HU X, LIU Y P. Screening and inhibitory effect of antagonistic endophytic bacteria in peach against Monilinia fructicola. Microbiology China, 2017, 44(8): 1874-1881. doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.160860. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.160860
[23] CASALS C, VINAS I, LANDL A, PICOUET P, TORRES R, USALL J. Application of radio frequency heating to control brown rot on peaches and nectarines. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2010, 58: 218-224.
doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.07.003
[24] SISQUELLA M, CASALS C, PICOUET P, VINAS I, TORRES R, USALL J. Immersion of fruit in water to improve radio frequency treatment to control brown rot in stone fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2013, 80: 31-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.01.010
[25] MINAS I S, TANOU G, MOLASSIOTIS A. Environmental and orchard bases of peach fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae. 2018, 235: 307-322.
doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.01.028
[26] FELICIANO A, FELICIANO A J, OGAWA J M. Monilinia fructicola resistance in the peach cv Bolinha. Phytopathology, 1987, 77: 776-780.
[27] GRADZIEL T M, THORPE R M, BOSTOCK R M, WILCOX S. Breeding for brown rot (Monilinia fructicola) resistance in clingstone peach with emphasis on the role of fruit phenolics. Acta Horticulture, 1997, 465: 161-170.
[28] LEE M H, BOSTOCK R M. Fruit exocarp phenols in relation to quiescence and development of Monilinia fructicola infections in Prunus spp., A role for cellular redox? Phytopath, 2007, 7: 269-277.
[29] RASEIRA M C B, NAKASU B H. Pepita: A peach cultivar for canning. Agropecuária Clima Temperado, Pelotas, 2000, 3: 283-285.
[30] WAGNER J A, RASEIRA M C B, PIEROBOM C R, FORTES J F, DA SILVA J B. Peach flower reaction to inoculation with Monilinia fructicola (Wint.) Honey. Journal of the American Pomological Society, 2005, 59(3): 141-147.
[31] MARTINEZ-GARCIA P J, PARFITT D E, BOSTOCK R M, FRESNEDO-RAMIREZ J, VAZQUEZ-LOBO A, OGUNDIWIN E A, GRADZIEL T M, CRISOSTO C H. Application of genomic and quantitative genetic tools to identify candidate resistance genes for brown rot resistance in peach. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8 (11): e78634.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078634
[32] BASSI D, RIZZO M, CANTONI L. Assaying brown rot [(Monilinia laxa Aderh. & Ruhl. (Honey)] susceptibility in peach cultivars and progeny. Acta Horticulture, 1998, 465: 715-721.
[33] PACHECO I, BASSI D, EDUARDO I, CIACCIULLI A, PIRONA R, ROSSINI L, VECCHIETTI A. QTL mapping for brown rot (Monilinia fructigena) resistance in an intraspecific peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) F1 progeny. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2014, 10(5): 1223-1242. doi: 10.1007/s11295-014-0756-7.
doi: 10.1007/s11295-014-0756-7
[34] OBI V I, BARRIUSO J J, MORENO M A, GIMÉNEZ R, GOGORCENA Y. Optimizing protocols to evaluate brown rot (Monilinia laxa) susceptibility in peach and nectarine fruits. Australasian Plant Pathology, 2017, 46(2): 183-189. doi: 10.1007/s13313-017-0475-2.
doi: 10.1007/s13313-017-0475-2
[35] 王力荣, 朱更瑞. 桃种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005: 56-61.
WANG L R, ZHU G R. Descriptors and Data Standard for Peach (Prunus persica L.). Beijing: Chinese Agriculture Press, 2005: 56-61. (in Chinese)
[36] PASCAL T, LEVIGNERON A, KERVELLA J, NGUYEN-THE C. Evaluation of two screening methods for resistance of apricot, plum and peach to Monilinia laxa. Euphytica, 1994, 77(1/2): 19-23. doi: 10.1007/BF02551455.
doi: 10.1007/BF02551455
[37] WALTER M, MCLAREN G F, FRASER J A, FRAMPTON C M, BOYD-WILSON K S H, PERRY J H. Methods of screening apricot fruit for resistance to brown rot caused by Monilinia spp. Australasian Plant Pathology, 2004, 33: 541-547.
doi: 10.1071/AP04062
[38] PAPAVASILEIOU A, TESTEMPASIS S, MICHAILIDES T J, KARAOGLANIDIS G S. Frequency of brown rot fungi on blossoms and fruit in stone fruit orchards in Greece. Plant Pathology, 2015, 64(2): 416-424.
doi: 10.1111/ppa.12264
[39] KESKE C, MAY-DE MIO L L, AMORIM L. Spatial pattern of brown rot within peach trees related to inoculum of Monilinia fructicola in organic orchard. Journal of Plant Pathology, 2013, 95(1): 67-73.
[40] HOLB I J, SZOKE S, ABONYI F. Temporal development and relationship amongst brown rot blossom blight, fruit blight and fruit rot in integrated and organic sour cherry orchards. Plant Pathology, 2013, 62(4): 799-808.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2012.02696.x
[41] KESKE C, AMORIM L, MAY-MIO L L. Peach brown rot incidence related to pathogen infection at different stages of fruit development in an organic peach production system. Crop Protection, 2011, 30(7): 802-806.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.03.005
[42] LEE M H, BOSTOCK R M. Induction, regulation, and role in pathogenesis of appressoria in Monilinia fructicola. Phytopathology, 2006, 96(10): 1072-1080. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-1072.
doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-96-1072
[43] GUIDARELLI M, ZUBINI P, NANNI V, BONGHI C, RASORI A, BERTOLINI P, BARALDI E. Gene expression analysis of peach fruit at different growth stages and with different susceptibility to Monilinia laxa. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2014, 140(3): 503-513. doi: 10.1007/s10658-014-0484-8.
doi: 10.1007/s10658-014-0484-8
[44] GRADZIEL T M, WANG D C. Evaluation of brown rot resistance and its relation to enzymatic browning in clingstone peach germplasm. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2019, 118(5): 675-679.
doi: 10.21273/JASHS.118.5.675
[45] OLIVEIRA LINO L, PACHECO I, MERCIER V, FAORO F, BASSI D, BORNARD I, QUILOT-TURION B. Brown rot strikes Prunus fruit: an ancient fight almost always lost. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2016, 64(20): 4029-4047. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00104.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00104
[46] SANTOS J, RASEIRA M C B, ZANANDREA I. Resistance to brown rot in peach plants. Bragantia, 2012, 71(2): 219-225.
doi: 10.1590/S0006-87052012005000022
[47] GRADZIEL T M. Almond species as sources of new genes for peach improvement. Acta Horticulture, 2002, 592: 81-88.
[1] CHEN MinDong, QIU BoYin, HUANG Hao, LI YongPing, WEN QingFang. Evaluation of Curd Texture Quality in Loose-Curd Cauliflower Germplasm [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1302-1316.
[2] HE ZhiLin, SUN CuiXia, YUE HongLi, TAN YueXia, ZHANG YaoHai, WANG FuSheng, LIU SiTao, JIANG Dong. Genetic Diversity Analysis and GWAS of Alloocimene Based on Resequencing of Citron, Lemon Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 386-401.
[3] LÜ Tao, SUN GuoQing, GUO DongCai, CHEN QuanJia, CAI YongSheng, FAN BiaoXing, QU YanYing, ZHENG Kai. Development and Effectiveness Evaluation of InDel Molecular Markers Closely Linked to Fiber Strength QTL in Gossypium barbadense [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1684-1701.
[4] SUN Ping, ZHU WenCan, LIN XianRui, WU JiaQi, CAO YiWen, CHEN ChenFei, WANG Yi, ZHU JianXi, JIA HuiJuan, QIAN MinJie, SHEN JianSheng. Effects of Rainy and Low Light Conditions on Coloration and Flavonoid Accumulation in Peach Peel Based on Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Analyses [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1173-1194.
[5] CHEN CaiJin, MA Lin, JIANG QingXue, LIU JinHui, MIAO Tong, ZHANG ZhiPeng, MENG Xiang, MA XiaoRan, ZHOU XinYue, ZHANG Jian, LIU WenHui, WANG XueMin. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Phenotypic Traits of 244 Forage Oat Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4825-4836.
[6] TIAN XianXian, FENG ShaoFang, WANG Qing, PAN ChenDong, LI Bo, FANG KaiXing, WU HuaLing, QIN DanDan. Biochemical Characteristics Analysis and Suitability Evaluation of Liannan Daye Tea Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(22): 4797-4812.
[7] CHEN TianXiao, CAO Rong, SONG QianNan, HU LiangLiang, WANG SuHua, WANG LiXia, CHENG XuZhen, CHEN HongLin. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance at the Seedling Stage and Screening of Tolerant Germplasm in Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4317-4332.
[8] CHEN YongXian, CHEN RuiJiang, DU YiZhi, ZHU JunJie, CHEN WanXia, ZHAO ZiHan, WANG JiChun, DU Kang, ZHANG Kai. Screening and Identification of Drought-Tolerant Sweet Potato Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 214-237.
[9] GUO TianFa, WU JinLong, QIU QianQian, MA XinChao, WANG LiRong, WU CuiYun. Relationship Between the Formation of Non-Red Color in the Fruit Skin of Xinjiang Local Peach Varieties and the Variation of PpMYB10.1 Promoter [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 326-338.
[10] BAO MingFang, QIN Yan, CHEN CaiJin, ZHANG ShangPei, ZHANG GuoHui, SHA XiaoDi. Evaluation of 111 Alfalfa Germplasm Resources for Seedling Phenotypic Drought Tolerance Characterization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(19): 3825-3836.
[11] MENG ZiNuo, FU ChangQing, ZHANG LingYu, GAO ShunJuan, CHANG JinHua, CUI JiangHui. Assessment of Salt Tolerance and Screening of Salt Tolerant Germplasm in Sorghum Seedling Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(16): 3317-3326.
[12] WU HuiQin, WANG Jing, YANG Yi, LIU XueQing, ZHANG KaiXuan, WANG LuYao, LU JiaWei, ZHAI Yuan, CHENG Yan. Analysis and Evaluation of Fruit Texture Quality of 96 Pepper Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(14): 2854-2868.
[13] GUO Lei, ZHANG BinBin, SHEN ZhiJun, YAN Juan, XU JianLan, CAI ZhiXiang, YU MingLiang, WANG FaLin, SONG HongFeng. The Release Characteristics of Medium and Trace Elements and Their Effects on Soil Available Nutrients after the Continuous Return of Green Manure in Peach Orchards [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(12): 2411-2426.
[14] CHEN CaiJin, MA Lin, BAO MingFang, ZHANG GuoHui, JIANG QingXue, YANG TianHui, WANG Chuan, WANG XiaoChun, GAO Ting, WANG XueMin, LIU WenHui. Identification and Evaluation of Drought Resistance for 111 Germplasm Resources of Alfalfa During Germination Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(10): 1896-1907.
[15] GUO Lei, HUANG ChenYan, SONG HongFeng, SHEN ZhiJun, ZHANG BinBin, MA RuiJuan, SUN Meng, HE Xin, YU MingLiang. Screening, Compounding and Safety Evaluation of Herbicides Suitable for Peach Nursery [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(9): 1734-1747.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备09089781号-30
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Tel: 86-010-82106279    E-mail: zgnykx@mail.caas.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd