Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 692-703.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.04.006

• PLANT PROTECTION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Tomato-Rice Rotation on Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Communities of Soil with Continuous Cropping Obstacles in Cangnan, Zhejiang

WANG ShaoHua1(), SHEN NianQiao2(), CHU TianRan1, WU YongHan3, LI KangNing2, SHI YanXia1, XIE XueWen1, LI Lei1, FAN TengFei1, LI BaoJu1(), CHAI ALi1()   

  1. 1 Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/State Key Laboratory of Vegetable Biobreeding, Beijing 100081
    2 Cangnan County Agricultural Technology Extension Station, Wenzhou 325800, Zhejiang
    3 Wenzhou Vocational College of Science & Technology, Wenzhou 325006, Zhejiang
  • Received:2024-10-21 Accepted:2024-12-04 Online:2025-02-16 Published:2025-02-24
  • Contact: LI BaoJu, CHAI ALi

Abstract:

【Objective】Long-term continuous cropping of tomato in Cangnan, Zhejiang Province leads to a series of soil continuous cropping obstacles, such as soil acidification, secondary salinization, soil compaction and serious soil-borne diseases. In this paper, the effects of tomato-rice rotation on soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activity, microbial biomass and microbial community structure under long-term continuous cropping were analyzed, aiming to provide a method to alleviate soil continuous cropping obstacles and improve soil environment.【Method】Three treatments were set up and soil samples were collected. T1 was tomato continuous monoculture for 18 years, T2 was tomato continuous monoculture for 17 years followed by one year of tomato-rice rotation, and T3 was tomato continuous monoculture for 15 years followed by three years of tomato-rice rotation. Soil pH and EC values were measured by pH meter and conductivity meter. Soil physicochemical properties such as total carbon, total nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen were determined by high temperature combustion method, Kjeldahl nitrogen fixation method and potassium chloride solution leaching method. Soil enzyme activities were determined using enzyme activity kits. Total and harmful microorganism concentrations were detected using qPCR, and soil culturable microorganisms were counted using selective medium plate smear counting method. The MiSeq PE3000 high-throughput sequencing platform was used for sequencing, splicing and assembly, sequence comparison and functional annotation of the soil microgenome.【Result】There were significant differences in soil physicochemical properties among different treatments. One and three years of tomato-rice rotation treatments increased soil pH from 5.20 to 6.04 and 6.73, and reduced EC from 558 μS·cm-1 to 417 and 445 μS·cm-1, and increased C﹕N ratios from 9.16 to 10.45 and 10.74. Soil enzyme activities were increased in the rotations, with catalase, urease, polyphenol oxidase activities increased from 11.72 μmol·d-1·g-1, 10.76 μg·d-1·g-1, and 22.67 mg·d-1·g-1 to 58.58 μmol·d-1·g-1, 142.48 μg·d-1·g-1, and 37.10 mg·d-1·g-1. After crop rotation, the microbial population and community structure changed, harmful microorganisms decreased. The content of soil culturable actinomycetes increased, the fungi/bacteria ratio decreased. Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, and Proteobacteria increased significantly, and Actinobacteria decreased significantly. The contents of Ralstonia solanacearum, Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, P. c. subsp. brasiliensis and Fusarium sp. decreased to 1.76×103, 7.28×102, 3.94×103 and 3.07×103 copies/g in the three years of crop rotation. The potential functions of soil microorganisms changed after crop rotation, with an increase in the abundance of genes related to carbohydrate metabolism, energy metabolism, and other related pathways. Specifically, genes associated with carbohydrate metabolism in metabolism were up-regulated.【Conclusion】Tomato-rice rotation can improve soil acidification, salinization and soil element imbalance caused by long-term monoculture, increase soil C﹕N ratio and enzyme activity, reduce the occurrence of soil-borne diseases, transform the soil from fungal type to bacterial type, change the structure of soil microbial community, and promote soil microbial carbohydrate metabolism, which is important for improving soil continuous cropping obstacles.

Key words: tomato-rice rotation, soil, physicochemical property, harmful microorganism, microbial community

Table 1

Primers information used for detecting harmful soil microorganisms"

病原菌
Pathogen
引物
Primer
序列
Sequence (5′-3′)
片段长度
Fragment size (bp)
参考文献
Reference
茄科雷尔氏菌
Ralstonia solanacearum
RSF
RSR
GTGCCTGCCTCCAAAACGACT GACGCCACCCGCATCCCTC 159 [12]
密执安棍状杆菌密执安亚种
Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis
Fan1
Fan2
GCATGTGCACCTCTCCTCTGTA
CCCCACAAGGAGGCGTACTA
146 [13]
胡萝卜软腐果胶杆菌胡萝卜亚种
Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum
INPCCF
INPCCR
TTCGATCACGCAACCTGCATTACT
GGCCAAGCAGTGCCTGTATATCC
400 [14]
胡萝卜软腐果胶杆菌巴西亚种
Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. brasiliensis
PMA1-F
PMA1-R
GTGCCGGGTTTATGAC
TGATAATG TCTTTCAC
142 [15]
瓜果腐霉
Pythium aphanidermatum
PA-4F
PA-4R
CAATGGTCTGGGCAAAT
TAAGTTCAGCGGGTAATC
166 [16]
辣椒疫霉
Phytophthora capsici
YM2F
YM2R
ATTCCTCCTGATAGATAG
CCCTCATCACAGAATGC
245 [17]
镰孢菌属
Fusarium sp.
F8-1
F8-2
GCTTCTCCCGAGTCCCA
GCTCAGCGGCTTCCTAT
189 [18]
大丽轮枝菌
Verticillium dahliae
VertBt-F
VertBt-R
AACAACAGTCCGATGGATAATTC
GTACCGGGCTCGAGATCG
115 [19]

Table 2

Physicochemical properties of soil for tomato cultivation in different treatments"

处理
Treatment
总碳
TC
(g·kg-1)
总氮
TN
(g·kg-1)
碳氮比
C/N
氨态氮
NH4+-N
(mg·kg-1)
硝态氮
NO3--N
(mg·kg-1)
速效磷
AP
(mg·kg-1)
速效钾
AK
(mg·kg-1)
有机质
SOM
(g·kg-1)
电导率
EC
(μS·cm-1)
pH
T1 19.13±0.11a 2.08±0.05a 9.16c 5.03±0.04a 385.20±0.04a 59.50±1.98a 190.96±2.99c 31.35±1.30a 558±2a 5.21±0.08c
T2 16.53±0.28c 1.59±0.35b 10.45b 3.52±0.30c 246.69±0.30b 24.33±1.34b 332.85±4.41a 23.95±0.08c 417±3c 6.04±0.04b
T3 18.16±0.15b 1.69±0.03b 10.74a 4.32±0.12b 46.94±0.12c 22.31±1.32b 215.51±2.72b 27.78±0.68b 445±7b 6.73±0.11a

Table 3

Heavy metal content of soil for tomato cultivation in different treatments (mg·kg-1)"

处理Treatment 铬Cr 铜Cu 锌Zn 砷As 镉Cd 铅Pb 汞Hg
T1 46.97±0.07b 56.68±1.55a 152.86±4.57a 5.95±0.02c 0.15±0.002a 29.65±0.08c 0.12±0.01a
T2 47.94±0.04a 26.73±0.17c 110.38±1.31c 8.50±0.06a 0.12±0.003c 31.51±0.17b 0.09±0.01c
T3 45.81±0.14c 29.69±0.12b 121.53±0.98b 6.83±0.09b 0.13±0.003b 33.50±0.10a 0.10±0.01b

Table 4

Enzyme activities of soil for tomato cultivation in different treatments"

处理
Treatment
过氧化氢酶
Catalase (μmol·d-1·g-1)
脲酶
Urease (μg·d-1·g-1)
多酚氧化酶
Polyphenol oxidase (mg·d-1·g-1)
酸性磷酸酶
Acid phosphatase (μmol·d-1·g-1)
T1 11.72±0.86c 10.76±0.06c 22.67±0.09c 20.49±0.85a
T2 58.58±0.11a 133.30±0.12b 37.10±0.26a 20.09±0.71a
T3 57.10±0.13b 142.48±0.10a 33.78±0.72b 10.63±0.10b

Table 5

Total amount of soil microorganisms in different treatments"

处理Treatment 细菌Bacterium 真菌Fungus 放线菌Actinomycete 真菌/细菌比值
Fungus/
bacterium ratio
总量
Total concentration (pg·g-1)
可培养细菌总量Concentration of culturable bacteria (cfu/g) 总量
Total concentration (pg·g-1)
可培养真菌总量Concentration of culturable fungi (cfu/g) 可培养放线菌总量
Concentration of culturable actinomycetes (cfu/g)
T1 (2.24±0.07)×105c (1.10±0.06)×107a (5.39±0.11)×103c (2.50±0.06)×104b (4.40±0.08)×105c 2.41×10-2/1a
T2 (1.36±0.04)×106a (1.03±0.07)×107a (2.55±0.10)×104a (4.30±0.24)×104a (8.00±0.08)×105b 1.88×10-2/1b
T3 (7.82±0.03)×105b (4.10±0.12)×106b (1.21±0.39)×104b (2.80±0.07)×104b (2.04±0.06)×106a 1.55×10-2/1c

Table 6

Content of soil pathogenic microorganisms in different treatments (copies/g)"

处理Treatment 茄科雷尔氏菌
Rs
密执安棍状杆
菌密执安亚种
Cmm
胡萝卜软腐果胶
杆菌胡萝卜亚种
Pcc
胡萝卜软腐果胶
杆菌巴西亚种
Pcb
瓜果腐霉
P. aphanidermatum
辣椒疫霉
P. capsici
镰孢菌属
F. sp.
大丽轮枝菌
V. dahliae
T1 (2.14±0.04)×103b - (1.80±0.04)×103a (6.18±0.33)×104a - - (4.04±0.08)×104a -
T2 (2.37±0.04)×103a - (1.24±0.06)×103b (1.59±0.11)×104b - - (3.39±0.08)×104b -
T3 (1.76±0.06)×103c - (7.28±0.03)×102c (3.94±0.32)×103c - - (3.07±0.05)×103c -

Fig. 1

Soil microbial species abundance histogram of different treatments"

Fig. 2

Heat map of clustering analysis of fungi (A) and bacteria (B) at phylum levels of different treatments"

Fig. 3

Soil microbial gene abundance map of different treatments"

[1]
BONANOMI G, LORITO M, VINALE F, WOO S L. Organic amendments, beneficial microbes, and soil microbiota: Toward a unified framework for disease suppression. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2018, 56: 1-20.

doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-100046 pmid: 29768137
[2]
VAN AGTMAAL M, STRAATHOF A, TERMORSHUIZEN A, TEURLINCX S, HUNDSCHEID M, RUYTERS S, BUSSCHAERT P, LIEVENS B, DE BOER W. Exploring the reservoir of potential fungal plant pathogens in agricultural soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 2017, 121: 152-160.
[3]
CHENG H Y, ZHANG D Q, HUANG B, SONG Z X, REN L R, HAO B Q, LIU J, ZHU J H, FANG W S, YAN D D, LI Y, WANG Q X, CAO A C. Organic fertilizer improves soil fertility and restores the bacterial community after 1,3-dichloropropene fumigation. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 738: 140345.
[4]
FIERER N, LEFF J W, ADAMS B J, NIELSEN U N, BATES S T, LAUBER C L, OWENS S, GILBERT J A, WALL D H, CAPORASO J G. Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(52): 21390-21395.
[5]
BAHRAM M, HILDEBRAND F, FORSLUND S K, ANDERSON J L, SOUDZILOVSKAIA N A, BODEGOM P M, BENGTSSON-PALME J, ANSLAN S, COELHO L P, HAREND H, et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature, 2018, 560(7717): 233-237.
[6]
BALLHAUSEN M B, DE BOER W. The sapro-rhizosphere: Carbon flow from saprotrophic fungi into fungus-feeding bacteria. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016, 102: 14-17.
[7]
KUZYAKOV Y, DOMANSKI G. Carbon input by plants into the soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2000, 163(4): 421-431.
[8]
HERRMANN M, SAUNDERS A, SCHRAMM A. Archaea dominate the ammonia-oxidizing community in the rhizosphere of the freshwater macrophyte Littorella uniflora. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 74(10): 3279-3283.
[9]
DALIAKOPOULOS I N, TSANIS I K, KOUTROULIS A, KOURGIALAS N N, VAROUCHAKIS A E, KARATZAS G P, RITSEMA C J. The threat of soil salinity: A European scale review. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 573: 727-739.
[10]
BROCKETT B F T, PRESCOTT C E, GRAYSTON S J. Soil moisture is the major factor influencing microbial community structure and enzyme activities across seven biogeoclimatic zones in western Canada. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 44(1): 9-20.
[11]
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
LU R K. Soil Agrochemical Analysis Method. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[12]
CHEN Y, ZHANG W Z, LIU X, MA Z H, LI B, ALLEN C, GUO J H. A real-time PCR assay for the quantitative detection of Ralstonia solanacearum in the horticultural soil and plant tissues. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 20(1): 193-201.
[13]
吴兴海, 邵秀玲, 邓明俊, 陈长法, 厉艳, 梁成珠. 番茄溃疡病菌实时荧光PCR快速检测方法研究. 江西农业学报, 2007, 19(3): 34-36.
WU X H, SHAO X L, DENG M J, CHEN C F, LI Y, LIANG C Z. Study on rapid detection of Clavibacterm ichiganensis subsp. michiganensis by real-time fluorescent PCR. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2007, 19(3): 34-36. (in Chinese)
[14]
KANG H W, KWON S W, GO S J. PCR-based specific and sensitive detection of Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum by primers generated from a URP-PCR fingerprinting-derived polymorphic band. Plant Pathology, 2003, 52(2): 127-133.
[15]
QU Y K, TANG J, LI Z Y, ZHOU Z H, WANG J J, WANG S N, CAO Y D. Soil enzyme activity and microbial metabolic function diversity in soda saline-alkali rice paddy fields of Northeast China. Sustainability, 2020, 12(23): 10095.
[16]
HUANG Y, XIAO X, HUANG H Y, JING J Q, ZHAO H J, WANG L, LONG X E. Contrasting beneficial and pathogenic microbial communities across consecutive cropping fields of greenhouse strawberry. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2018, 102: 5717-5729.

doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9013-6 pmid: 29704041
[17]
程颖超, 康华军, 石延霞, 柴阿丽, 张红杰, 谢学文, 李宝聚. 辣椒疫霉菌RT-PCR检测技术的建立及应用. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(5): 997-1006.

doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2017-0862
CHENG Y C, KANG H J, SHI Y X, CHAI A L, ZHANG H J, XIE X W, LI B J. Development and application of real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR for detection of Phytophthora capsica. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2018, 45(5): 997-1006. (in Chinese)
[18]
CHEN L D, LI L, XIE X W, CHAI A L, SHI Y X, FAN T F, XIE J M, LI B J. An improved method for quantification of viable Fusarium cells in infected soil products by propidium monoazide coupled with real-time PCR. Microorganisms, 2022, 10(5): 1037.
[19]
ATALLAH Z K, BAE J, JANSKY S H, ROUSE D I, STEVENSON W R. Multiplex real-time quantitative PCR to detect and quantify Verticillium dahliae colonization in potato lines that differ in response to Verticillium wilt. Phytopathology, 2007, 97(7): 865-872.
[20]
MACDONALD C A, THOMAS N, ROBINSON L, TATE K R, ROSS D J, DANDO J, SINGH B K. Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses of the soil microbial community after afforestation of pastures with Pinus radiata. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41(8): 1642-1651.
[21]
BABIN D, DEUBEL A, JACQUIOD S, SØRENSEN S J, GEISTLINGER J, GROSCH R, SMALLA K. Impact of long-term agricultural management practices on soil prokaryotic communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019, 129: 17-28.
[22]
VON LÜTZOW M, LEIFELD J, KAINZ M, KÖGEL-KNABNER I, MUNCH J C. Indications for soil organic matter quality in soils under different management. Geoderma, 2002, 105(3): 243-258.
[23]
ALLARD S M, WALSH C S, WALLIS A E, OTTESEN A R, BROWN E W, MICALLEF S A. Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) hosts robust phyllosphere and rhizosphere bacterial communities when grown in soil amended with various organic and synthetic fertilizers. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 573: 555-563.
[24]
XIE X M, LIAO M, YANG J, CHAI J J, FANG S, WANG R H. Influence of root-exudates concentration on pyrene degradation and soil microbial characteristics in pyrene contaminated soil. Chemosphere, 2012, 88(10): 1190-1195.
[25]
LIU Y X, LI X, CAI K, CAI L T, LU N, SHI J X. Identification of benzoic acid and 3-phenylpropanoic acid in tobacco root exudates and their role in the growth of rhizosphere microorganisms. Applied Soil Ecology, 2015, 93: 78-87.
[26]
KUNITO T, AKAGI Y, PARK H D, TODA H. Influences of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on polyphenol oxidase activity in a forested andisol. European Journal of Forest Research, 2009, 128(4): 361-366.
[27]
DE BOER W, FOLMAN L B, SUMMERBELL R C, BODDY L. Living in a fungal world: Impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2005, 29(4): 795-811.

pmid: 16102603
[28]
DE BOER W, HUNDSCHEID M P J, GUNNEWIEK P J A, DE RIDDER-DUINE A S, THION C, VEEN J A, WAL A. Antifungal rhizosphere bacteria can increase as response to the presence of saprotrophic fungi. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(9): e0137988.
[29]
EDWARDS J, JOHNSON C, SANTOS-MEDELLÍN C, LURIE E, PODISHETTY N K, BHATNAGAR S, EISEN J A, SUNDARESAN V. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(8): E911-E920.
[30]
IBEKWE A M, POSS J A, GRATTAN S R, GRIEVE C M, SUAREZ D. Bacterial diversity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) rhizosphere in response to salinity, soil pH, and boron. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42(4): 567-575.
[31]
LING N, ZHU C, XUE C, CHEN H, DUAN Y H, PENG C, GUO S W, SHEN Q R. Insight into how organic amendments can shape the soil microbiome in long-term field experiments as revealed by network analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2016, 99: 137-149.
[32]
MAHERALI H, KLIRONOMOS J N. Influence of phylogeny on fungal community assembly and ecosystem functioning. Science, 2007, 316(5832): 1746-1748.

doi: 10.1126/science.1143082 pmid: 17588930
[33]
LAUBER C L, HAMADY M, KNIGHT R, FIERER N. Pyrosequencing- based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(15): 5111-5120.
[1] XU YangHaoJun, CHEN LiMing, YANG ShiQi, TANG YiFan, TAN XueMing, ZENG YongJun, PAN XiaoHua, ZENG YanHua. Effects of Long-Term Different Straw Returning Methods on Soil Organic Carbon, Nutrients and Aggregate Formation in Different Soil Layers of Double Cropping Rice Field [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1492-1506.
[2] LI YongJuan, ZHANG YueTong, WANG YiBo, ZHAO ChangJiang, SONG Jie, CHEN XueLi, YAO Qin. Effects of Biochar Application on the Abundance and Community Composition of Nitrogen-Fixing Microbial nifH Gene in Soybean Rotation and Continuous Cropping Systems [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[3] WEI YuanHui, YU YiHui, LI ZiJun, DING WenJie, TU WenLong, MAO YanLing. Effects of Long-Term Fertilization on Soil Organic Carbon Structure and Carbon-Fixing Bacterial Community Structure in Yellow-Mud Paddy Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1020-1033.
[4] LI WenHu, LI HaiFeng, DU YuPeng, DING YuLan, LUO YiNuo, LI YuKe, SHE WenTing, ZHANG Feng, TENG Yu, ZHANG SiQi, HUANG Cui, LI XiaoHan, LIU JinShan, WANG ZhaoHui. Regional Differences in Wheat Zinc Uptake and Translocation Responses to Soil Zinc Fertilization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1034-1047.
[5] YAN YanGe, ZHANG ShuiQin, XU Meng, XU JiuKai, LI YanTing, ZHAO BingQiang, YUAN Liang. Transformation Characteristics of Dextran-Modified Urea in Fluvo- Aquic Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1048-1059.
[6] WEN YuBin, BAI ShanShan, CAI ZeJiang, SUN Nan, XU MingGang. Effects of Organic Materials on Soil Microbial Biomass and Its Acidity Regulation Mechanism [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 834-849.
[7] GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[8] LIU MengYang, LIU Jie, CHEN Xiang, WANG QingYun, LUO LaiChao, QI YongBo, TIAN Da, LI JinCai, CHAI RuShan. Effects of Long-Term Straw Return on Distribution of Aggregates and Phosphorus Fractions in Shajiang Black Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 575-588.
[9] XIAN QingLin, XIAO JianKe, GAO AQing, GAO LiChuang, LIU Yang. Effects of Planting Patterns Combined with Soil Moisture Measurement and Supplementary Irrigation on the Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Winter Wheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 589-601.
[10] YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[11] CHEN GuiPing, WEI JinGui, GUO Yao, LI Pan, WANG FeiEr, QIU HaiLong, FENG FuXue, YIN Wen. Synergistic Effects of Wide-Narrow Row and Density Enhancement on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Resource Utilization of Maize in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 278-291.
[12] WANG RenZhuo, LI YueYing, HUANG ShaoMin, JIANG GuiYing, ZHANG Qi, LIU ChaoLin, YANG Jin, WANG MengRu, WANG BeiBei, LIU Fang, GUO DouDou, JIE XiaoLei, SONG Lian, LIU ShiLiang. Effects of Long-Term Combination of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Bacterial Community Structure, Ecological Network, and Key Species in Fluvo-Aquic Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 354-367.
[13] GUO HuiTing, SUN YanWen, NIU YiHeng, LI YaPeng, LI JianHua, XU MingGang. Fertilization Significantly Changed Soil Bacterial Diversity and Dominant Microbial Community in Croplands of Northern China—Meta Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 114-128.
[14] LÜ XuDong, SUN ShiYuan, LI YaNan, LIU YuLong, WANG YanQun, FU Xin, ZHANG JiaYing, NING Peng, PENG ZhengPing. Effects of Intelligent Mechanized Layered Fertilization on Root-Soil Nutrient Distribution and Yield in Wheat Fields [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 129-146.
[15] LU Hao, ZHANG MingLong, HAN Mei, YAN QingBiao, LI ZhengPeng, YIN Wen, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang. Green Manure Returning via Sheep Digest with Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction are Beneficial to Improve Wheat Yield and Soil Quality at Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 147-160.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!