Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (7): 1173-1182.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.005

Special Issue: SPECIAL FOCUS ON GRAPE RESEARCH

• SPECIAL FOCUS ON GRAPE RESEARCH • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Local Root Zone Salinity on Grapevine Injury, Na + Accumulation and Allocation of Carbon and Nitrogen

SUN Hong,JIANG YiWen,YU Xin,XIANG GuangQing,YAO YuXin()   

  1. College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops in Huanghuai Region, Ministry of Agriculture, Tai’an 271018, Shandong
  • Received:2018-07-18 Accepted:2018-10-20 Online:2019-04-01 Published:2019-04-04
  • Contact: YuXin YAO E-mail:yaoyx@sdau.edu.cn

Abstract:

【Objective】 Salt stress seriously affects yield and fruit quality of fruit crops. Soil salinity is often heterogeneous in saline fields, and within the different root zones of single plant the salinity of the soil solution might vary widely. This paper was aimed to determine the injury extent of grapevine under the non-uniform salt treatment, and to disclose the corresponding mechanism through the determination of Na + flux and allocation of carbon and nitrogen in grapevine. 【Method】 Saline environment of vine roots was controlled through split-root system and five treatments with different NaCl concentration (mmol·L -1) were set: 0/0, 0/50, 50/50, 0/100, and 100/100. Grapevine injury was evaluated via determining content of chlorophyll and malondialdehyde (MDA) as well as the changes of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. Na + transport was analyzed by the determination of Na + content, Na + flux and electrical conductivity of culture medium around roots. Nitrogen utilization efficiency and distribution rate of carbon and nitrogen were used to detect the changes of carbon and nitrogen in different tissues under different treatments.【Result】The uniform salt treatment of bilateral roots significantly reduced the content of chlorophyll and enhanced the MDA levels in roots and leaves at 15 and 30 days after treatment. In contrast, salt treatment of local roots alleviated the chlorophyll decrease and the MDA accumulation. Additionally, the determination of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, such as Fv/Fm and ERT, showed the similar results. Therefore, the roots in the non-saline side could alleviate the grapevine injury in comparison to the uniform salt treatments. All of salt treatments increased Na + content in roots and leaves to varying extents at 15 days after treatment; particularly, the Na + content of the roots in the non-saline side was also enhanced; additionally, local root zone salinity significantly decreased the Na + content in leaves, and local treatment of 100 mmol·L -1NaCl significantly reduced the Na + content in saline side roots, compared to the uniform NaCl treatment. The Na + efflux was observed in non-treated roots, however, the Na + flux was reversed to influx in the non-saline side roots under non-uniform salt treatment. Additionally, the electrical conductivity of the culture medium around the roots in the non-saline side was significantly enhanced. Therefore, the Na + absorbed from the salt-treated side could be transported to the non-saline side roots and thereby expelled out of the roots. Nitrogen utilization efficiency was significantly reduced by the uniform salt treatment and the decline was associated with salt treatment concentration. In contrast, the non-uniform salt treatment alleviated the declines in nitrogen utilization efficiency and particularly, which was significantly enhanced in the non-saline side roots under the 0/100 mmol·L -1treatment. The uniform salt treatments and particularly 100 mmol·L -1NaCl decreased the distribution rate of nitrogen in roots and leaves and increased the values in the two-year-old shoots, favoring the storage of nitrogen. In contrast, the non-saline side roots alleviated the declines of nitrogen distribution rate in roots and leaves. The uniform salt treatment decreased carbon distribution rate in leaves and roots; in contrast, the non-saline side roots not only alleviated the declines of carbon distribution rate in leaves but also elevated carbon distribution rate in roots. It was noteworthy that 50 and 100 mmol·L -1 NaCl treatments imparted different effects on carbon distribution in new shoots and two-year-old shoots, i.e., the uniform and non-uniform treatments of 50 mmol·L -1 NaCl enhanced carbon distribution in the two-year-old shoots while the treatments of 100 mmol·L -1 NaCl produced the contrary results.【Conclusion】Compared with the uniform salt treatment, NaCl treatment of local roots produced the lesser injury for grapevines. Na + absorbed from the salt-treated side was transported to the non-treated side, expelled them from the roots, and thereby reduced Na + accumulation in leaves. The non-saline side roots alleviated the declines in carbon and nitrogen distribution rate of leaves and roots.

Key words: grapevine, salt treatment of local roots, injury extent, Na + flux, allocation of carbon and nitrogen

Fig. 1

Split-root system used in this study"

Fig. 2

Effects of NaCl treatments on chlorophyll, MDA and chlorophyll fluorescence parameter Values indicated by the different letters are significant at P<0.05. The same as below"

Fig. 3

Effects of the non-uniform or uniform salt treatment on the content of Na+ in grape roots (A) and leaves (B)"

Fig. 4

Effect of split-root salt treatment on the Na+ flux in grape root tip"

Fig. 5

Effect of split-root salt treatment on nitrogen utilization efficiency of grapevines"

Table 1

Effects of split-root salt treatment on 15N distribution ratio (%) in grapevines"

处理
Treatment
叶片
Leaf
一年生蔓
Shoot
多年生蔓
Two-year-old shoot
根系
Root
非处理侧根系
Non-treated side
处理侧根系
Salt-treated side
0/0 50.22±2.52a 11.06±0.35b 10.46±1.64b 23.07±0.92a
0/50 52.68±0.74a 11.80± 0.33ab 9.50±1.35bc 20.59±0.74b 10.88±1.19 9.70±1.56
50/50 50.12±1.26a 12.71±0.77a 12.35±1.42b 19.39±1.01b
0/100 52.00±0.83a 12.55±0.56a 8.83±0.74c 19.29±1.01b 12.90±0.49** 6.39±0.38
100/100 40.88±2.83b 12.03±0.28ab 19.80±2.28a 18.24±0.49b

Table 2

Effects of split-root salt treatment on 13C distribution ratio (%) of vines"

处理
Treatment
叶片
Leaf
一年生蔓
Shoot
多年生蔓
Two-year-old shoot
根系
Root
非处理侧根系
Non-treated side
处理侧根系
Salt-treated side
0/0 48.04±1.84a 17.18±0.87ab 18.37±0.90b 15.08±0.42b
0/50 43.74±1.07b 16.09±1.04b 19.22±2.29b 15.95±0.29ab 8.41±0.38 7.54±0.59
50/50 41.38±1.64c 16.14±0.34b 23.43±1.92a 13.78±0.51c
0/100 43.53±1.16b 17.26±0.50a 16.48±0.91c 16.35±1.08a 8.35±0.34 8.00±0.54
100/100 41.52±1.81c 18.13±0.45a 15.70±1.45c 8.85±1.51d
[1] MUNNS R, TESTER M . Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008,59:651-681.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
[2] HARIADI Y, MARANDON K, TIAN Y, JACOBSEN S E, SHABALA S . Ionic and osmotic relations in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants grown at various salinity levels. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011,62:185-193.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq257 pmid: 20732880
[3] BERTHOMIEU P, CONÉJÉRO G, NUBLAT A, BRACKENBURY W J, LAMBERT C, SAVIO C, UOZUMI N, OIKI S, TAMADA K, CELLIER F, GOSTI F, SIMONNEAU T, ESSAH P A, TESTER M, VÉRY A, SENTENAC H, CASSE F . Functional analysis of AtHKT1 in Arabidopsis shows that Na + recirculation by the phloem is crucial for salt tolerance . EMBO Journal, 2003,22:2004-2014.
doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg207
[4] SUN J, CHEN S L, DAI S X, WANG R G, LI N Y, SHEN X, ZHOU X Y, LU K F, ZHENG S J, HU Z M, ZHANG Z K, SONG J, XU Y . NaCl-induced alternations of cellular and tissue ion fluxes in roots of salt resistant and salt-sensitive poplar species. Plant Physiology, 2009,149:1141-1153.
[5] SULLIVAN P F . Evidence of soil nutrient availability as the proximate constraint on growth of treeline trees in northwest Alaska: Reply. Ecology, 2016,97(3):803-808.
doi: 10.1890/14-0626.1 pmid: 26236868
[6] 徐晨, 刘晓龙, 李前, 凌凤楼, 武志海, 张志安 . 供氮水平对盐胁迫下水稻叶片光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 植物学报, 2018,53(2):185-195.
doi: 10.11983/CBB17063
XU C, LIU X L, LI Q, LING F L, WU Z H, ZHANG Z A . Effect of salt stress on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of rice leaf for nitrogen levels. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2018,53(2):185-195. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11983/CBB17063
[7] MUNNS R, JAMES R A, LAUCHLI A . Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2006,57:1025-1043.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj100 pmid: 16510517
[8] KUŹNIAK E, KORNAS A, GABARA B, ULLRICH C, SKLODOWSKA M, MISZALSKI Z . Interaction of Botrytis cinerea with the intermediate C3-CAM plant Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2010,69:137-147.
[9] CHOJAK-KOŹNIEWSKA J, KUŹNIAK E, LINKIEWICZ A, SOWA S . Primary carbon metabolism-related changes in cucumber exposed to single and sequential treatments with salt stress and bacterial infection. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2018,123:160-169.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.12.015
[10] KONG X Q, LUO Z, DONG HZ, ENEJI A E, LI W J . H2O2 and ABA signaling are responsible for the increased Na + efflux and water uptake in Gossypium hirsutum L. roots in the non-saline side under non-uniform root zone salinity. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016,67(8):2247-2261.
[11] BAZIHIZINA N, BARRETT-LENNARD E G, COLMER T D . Plant responses to heterogeneous salinity: Growth of the halophyte Atriplex nummularia is determined by the root-weighted mean salinity of the root zone. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012,63:6347-6358.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers302 pmid: 3504498
[12] 赵世杰, 史国安, 董新纯 . 植物生理实验学指导. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2002.
ZHAO S J, SHI G A, DONG X C. Techniques of Plant Physiological Experiment. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2002. (in Chinese)
[13] 彭春雪, 耿贵, 砖丽华, 杨云, 邱植, 孙菲, 孙学伟, 赵慧杰 . 不同浓度钠对甜菜生长及生理特性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(2):459-465.
PENG C X, GENG G, ZHUAN L H, YANG Y, QIU Z, SUN F, SUN X W, ZHAO H J . Effects of different Na + concentrations on growth and physiological traits of sugar beet . Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2014,20(2):459-465. (in Chinese)
[14] 孙璐, 周宇飞, 李丰先, 肖木辑, 陶冶, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬 . 盐胁迫对高粱幼苗光合作用和荧光特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(16):3265-3272.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.16.005
SUN L, ZHOU Y F, LI F X, XIAO M J, TAO Y, XU W J, HUANG R D . Impacts of salt stress on characteristics of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of sorghum seedlings. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012,45(16):3265-3272. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.16.005
[15] 胡文海, 喻景权 . 低温弱光对番茄叶片光合作用和叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 园艺学报, 2001,28(1):41-46.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2001.01.008
HU W H, YU J Q . Effects of chilling under low light on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristic in tomato leaves. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2001,28(1):41-46. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2001.01.008
[16] KONG X Q, LUO Z, DONG H Z, ENEJI A E, LI W J . Effects of non-uniform root zone salinity on water use, Na + recirculation, and Na + and H + flux in cotton . Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012,63:2105-2116.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/err420 pmid: 22200663
[17] WEST D W . Water use and sodium chloride uptake by apple trees. II. The response to soil oxygen deficiency. Plant and Soil, 1978,50:51-65.
doi: 10.1007/BF02107156
[18] MUNNS R . Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2002,25:239-250.
doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x pmid: 11841667
[19] DEGARIS K A, WALKER R R, LOVEYS B R, TYERMAN S D . Exogenous application of abscisic acid to root systems of grapevines with or without salinity influences water relations and ion allocation. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 2017,23:66-76.
doi: 10.1111/ajgw.12264
[20] SAXENA I, SRIKANTH S, CHEN Z . Cross talk between H2O2 and interacting signal molecules under plant stress response. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016,7:570.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00570 pmid: 4848386
[21] WANG X P, BAI T C, ZHI J H, LI Z Y . Effects of salt water drip irrigation on jujube roots soil available nitrogen distribution: A security assurance perspective. International Journal of Security and Its Applications, 2016,10(2):267-278.
[22] PARDO J M . Biotechnology of water and salinity stress tolerance. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2010,21(2):185-196.
doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.02.005 pmid: 20189794
[23] BAZIHIZINA N, COLMER T D, BARRETT-LENNARD E G . Response to non-uniform salinity in the root zone of the halophyte Atriplex nummularia: growth, photosynthesis, water relations and tissue ion concentrations. Annals of Botany, 2009,104:737-745.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp151 pmid: 27296421512
[24] XU J W, HUANG X, LAN H X, ZHANG H S, HUANG J . Rearrangement of nitrogen metabolism in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under salt stress. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2016,11(3):e1138194.
doi: 10.1080/15592324.2016.1138194 pmid: 4883850
[25] 马晓东, 钟小莉, 桑钰 . 干旱胁迫下胡杨实生幼苗氮素吸收分配与利用. 生态学报, 2018,38(20):1-11.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201711282136
MA X D, ZHONG X L, SANG Y . Characteristics of nitrogen absorption, distribution, and utilization by Populus euphratica seedlings under drought stress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(20):1-11. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201711282136
[26] AHANGER M A, AGARWAL R M . Salinity stress induced alterations in antioxidant metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L) as influenced by potassium supplementation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2017,115:449-460.
[27] IQBAL N, UMAR S, KHAN N A . Nitrogen availability regulates proline and ethylene production and alleviates salinity stress in mustard (Brassica juncea). Journal of Plant Physiology, 2015,178(15):84-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.02.006 pmid: 25800225
[28] RICHTER J A, ERBAN A, KOPKA J, ZORB C . Metabolic contribution to salt stress in two maize hybrids with contrasting resistance. Plant Science, 2015,233:107-115.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.01.006 pmid: 25711818
[29] HELLMANN H, FUNCK D, RENTSCH D, FROMMER W . Hypersensitivity of an arabidopsis sugar signaling mutant toward exogenous proline application. Plant Physiology, 2000,123:779-790.
doi: 10.1104/pp.123.2.779
[30] FU J, WANG Y F, LIU Z H, LI Z T, YANG K J . Trichoderma asperellum alleviates the effects of saline-alkaline stress on maize seedlings via the regulation of photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism. Plant Growth Regulation, 2018,85:363-374.
doi: 10.1007/s10725-018-0386-4
[1] JIA ShanShan,LUO QiangWei,LI ShaSha,WANG YueJin. Optimization of Embryo Rescue Technique and Production of Potential Seedless Grape Germplasm with Rosy Aroma [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(16): 3344-3355.
[2] SHI XiangBin,WANG XiaoDi,WANG BaoLiang,WANG ZhiQiang,JI XiaoHao,WANG XiaoLong,LIU FengZhi,WANG HaiBo. Requirement Characteristics of Mineral Elements in Different Developmental Phases of Kyoho Grapevine [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(15): 2686-2694.
[3] BIAN FengE, XIAO QiuHong, HAO GuiMei, SUN YongJiang, LU WenLi, DU YuanPeng, ZHAI Heng. Effect of Root-Applied Melatonin on Endogenous Melatonin and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics in Grapevine Under NaCl Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(5): 952-963.
[4] ZHA Qian, XI XiaoJun, JIANG AiLi, TIAN YiHua. Influence of Heat Stress on the Expression of Related Genes and Proteins in Grapevines [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(9): 1674-1683.
[5] YU Yi-he, LI Xiu-zhen, GUO Da-long, YANG Ying-jun, LI Xue-qiang, ZHANG Guo-hai. Screening and Identification of the Interacting Protein of Cytokinin Response Regulator VvRR2 in Grapevine [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(6): 1097-1105.
[6] YU Yi-he, LI Xiu-zhen, GUO Da-long, ZHANG Hui-ling, YANG Ying-jun, LI Xue-qiang, ZHANG Guo-hai. Characteristics and Expression of Calmodulin Like B Subunit Interaction Protein VvCIPK10 in Grapevine [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(19): 3798-3806.
[7] LIU Qing, LUAN Xue-tao, XU Shi-yan,MENG Ying, GAO Jiang-man, XI Zhu-mei. Effect of 24-epibrassinolide Treatment on Grapevine Leaf Against Plasmopara viticola [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(15): 3010-3018.
[8] ZHANG Yong-jiang, XIN Yan-yan, LI Gui-fen, QIAN Yi-ke. Development of a RT-LAMP Assay for Detection of Grapevine virus A [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(1): 103-109.
[9] MIN Zhuo-1, GENG Wan-Gang-1, FANG Yu-Lin-1, 2 , ZHANG Zhen-Wen-1, 2 , LI Hua-1, 2 . Screening and Identification of Differentially Expressed Endodormant Genes from Latent Buds and Prompt Buds by Suppression Subtractive Hybridization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(5): 1029-1040.
[10] QIN Ling, KANG Wen-Huai, QI Yan-Ling, CAI Ai-Jun. Effects of Salt Stress on Mesophyll Cell Structures and Photosynthetic Characteristics in Leaves of Wine Grape (Vitis spp.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(20): 4233-4241.
[11] WANG Xi-Cheng, REN Guo-Hui, FANG Jing-Gui, LI A-Ying, LIU Hong, WU Wei-Min, ZHAO Mi-Zhen. Cloning, Subcellular Localization and Expression Analysis of Genes Related to the Synthesis of Gibberellin from Grapevine [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(11): 2224-2231.
[12] YANG Guang,CAO Xue,FANG Jing-gui,HUANG Zhen-xi,TAO Jian-min,WANG Chen
. Sub-Cellular Localization and Expression Analysis of Genes Involved in Grapevine Floral Development
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(3): 641-650 .
[13] ZHANG Zong-Qin, SUN Feng, JIN Qiang, LIU Wen-Jie, TIAN Bei-Bei, WANG Jing-Jing, LUO Qiang-Wei, GAO Jiang-Sheng, WANG Yue-Jin. Studies on the Phenolic Compounds in Berries of Vitis vinefera cv. Thompson Seedless Lines [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(17): 3594-3602.
[14] WANG Jun. Biotechnology and Genetic Breeding of Grapevine
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(8): 2862-2874 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!