Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (14): 2825-2834.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.14.018

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles    

Isolation and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Halostachys Caspica Silage

YIN Xue1, GUO XueFeng1,2, LIU JunFeng1,2, ZHANG XiuPing1,2, XI LinQiao1,2, ZHANG SuJiang1,2   

  1. 1College of Animal Science, Tarim University, Alar 843300, Xinjiang; 2Key Laboratory of Animal Husbandry Science and Technology, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps, Alar 843300, Xinjiang
  • Received:2017-09-18 Online:2018-07-16 Published:2018-07-16

Abstract: 【Objective】In order to make rational use of forage resources to provide high quality silage for animal husbandry in southern Xinjiang, the nutritional value and fermentation quality of Halostachys caspica silage after flowering and fruiting stage were discussed in this study, and the Lactobacillus resources were provided for screening silage fermentation quality. 【Method】A small dose natural fermented silage was made in the laboratory of flower and fruit period in the Akesu area of Xinjiang province. After 150 d fermentation, the contents of dry matter, crude protein, soluble sugar, neutral detergent fiber and acid washing fiber were compared before and after silage, and the contents of pH, ammonia nitrogen, lactic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid in silage were measured. Combining with the physiological and biochemical analysis, the pure culture method from silage microbial analysis was adopted to investigate the species, morphological, and physiological-biochemical characteristics of lactic acid bacteria from Halostachys caspica silage in Xinjiang. The DNA Blast technique was used to compare the measured sequence with the GenBank database, thus the species of the known classified status of the highest homology of the tested sequence were selected and downloaded. Together with the sequence of the strains tested in this test, the strains were compared with the Clustal, and the phylogenetic tree was plotted with MEGA5.0 to determine the classification status of the strains and to separate the isolates. As a result, the strains were identified. 【Result】Compared with pre silage, dry matter and soluble sugar content in raw materials decreased after lactic acid bacteria fermentation. At the same time, in the process of silage fermentation, the water-soluble carbohydrates, which were difficult to degrade in the stem, were degraded by lactic acid bacteria to the fibers those were easily used by domestic animals, which led to the increase of the content of neutral detergent fiber and acid washing fiber. Silage pH was 4.254—4.286, and lactic acid content was 60.923—61.283 mg·mL-1, which belonged to the range of good quality silage. 9 strains of lactic acid bacteria were isolated and were mainly Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus lactis, Bacillus cereus, Lactobacillus pentosus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus buchneri. 9 strains of lactic acid bacteria were found in the range of pH 4—7, and grew well under the condition of 3% and 6.5% concentration of NaCl, at the same time, the bacteria also grew well between 10 °C and 45 °C. It could also use D- glucose, D- mannose, cellobiose, D- mannitol, D- fructose, sucrose and many other carbon sources. Among them, Lactobacillus pentosus and Lactobacillus buchneri had higher acid production rate and faster growth rate, which showed strong acid and salt tolerance, thrived in the 5—45 °C range, and could be applied to the preparation of silage additives. 【Conclusion】The nutrient content and fermentation quality of the Halostachys caspica were in good level after green storage. The 3 strains of Lactobacillus pentosus, Lactobacillus buchneri, and Lactobacillus plantarum could be selected as additives in the process of making silage.

Key words: halostachys caspica, lactic acid bacteria, isolation, identification

[1]    陶大勇. 盐穗木研究进展. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(20): 6083-6084.
TAO D Y. Research progress of halostachys caspica. Joumal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2007, 35(20):6083-6084. (in Chinese)
[2]    赵金香, 贾琦珍, 张国峰, 陈瑛, 丁大旺, 陶大勇. 盐穗木对卡拉库尔羊临床指标及血液生化指标的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2011, 39(3): 277-280.
ZHAO J X, JIA Q Z, ZHANG G F, CHEN Y, DING D W, TAO D Y. Effect of salt spike wood on clinical indexes and blood biochemical
indexes of Karakul sheep. Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 2011, 39(3) : 277-280. (in Chinese)
[3]    蔡义民, 熊井清雄, 廖芷, 福见良平. 乳酸菌剂对青贮饲料发酵品质的改善效果. 中国农业科学, 1995, 28(2):73-82.
CAI Y M, KUMAI S, LIAO Z, FUKUMI R. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on fermentative quality of silage. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1995, 28(2):73-82. (in Chinese)
[4]    张庆, 张万军, 田吉鹏, 王雨, 李旭娇, 玉柱. 乳酸菌青贮技术研究进展. 草业科学, 2014(2): 328-333.
ZHANG Q, ZHNANG W J, TIAN J P, WANG Y, LI X J, YU Z. Advances in lactic acid bacteria silage technology research. Pratacultural Science, 2014(2):328-333. (in Chinese)
[5]    杨云贵, 张越利, 杜欣, 刘桂要, 曹社会. 2种玉米青贮饲料青贮过程中主要微生物的变化规律研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 2012(3): 397-403.
YANG Y G, ZHANG Y L, DU X, LIU G Y, CAO S H. Study on the major microorganism changes during the silage processing of two kinds of corn silage. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2012(3):397-403. (in Chinese)
[6]    倪奎奎. 全株水稻青贮饲料中微生物菌群以及发酵品质分析[D]. 郑州:郑州大学, 2016.
NI K K. Research on the bacterial community and fermentation quality of whole crop rice silage[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2016. (in Chinese)
[7]    凌代文. 乳酸细菌分类鉴定及实验方法. 北京:中国轻工业出版社,1999:117-127.
LING D W. Classification and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Method [M]. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 1999:117-127. (in Chinese)
[8]    张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2003:46-75.
ZHANG L Y. Feed Analysis and Feed Quality Testing Technology, Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2003:46-75. (in Chinese)
[9]    刘桂茹. 不同硫酸蒽酮比色定糖法的比较. 天津农业科学, 2016, 22(03):5-7+22.
LIU G R. Difference of sulfuric acid anthrone colorimetric methods of sugar. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 22(03): 5-7+22. (in Chinese)
[10]   郑惠文, 张秋云, 李文慧, 章世奎, 席万鹏. 新疆杏果实发育过程中可溶性糖和有机酸的变化. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(20): 3981-3992.
ZHENG H W, ZHANG Q Y, LI W H, ZHANG S K, XI W P. Changes in soluble sugars and organic acids of Xinjiang apricot during fruit development and ripening. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(20): 3981-3992. (in Chinese)
[11]   刘慧. 现代食品微生物学实验技术. 北京:中国轻工业出版社,  2011: 260-284.
Liu H. Modern Food Microbiology Experiment Technology. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2011: 260-284. (in Chinese)
[12]   东秀珠, 蔡妙英. 常见细菌系统鉴定手册. 北京: 科学出版社,2001:364-370.
DONG X Z, CAI M Y. Common Bacteria Manual System Identification. Beijing: Science Press, 2001:364-370. (in Chinese)
[13]   张刚. 乳酸细菌—基础、技术和应用. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2007:40-43.
ZHANG G. Lactic Acid Bacteria- Based Technology and Application. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2007:40-43. (in Chinese)
[14]   尹雪, 郭雪峰, 帕提古丽·毛拉红, 刘俊峰, 张秀萍, 席琳乔, 程龙. 传统发面面肥中乳酸菌的分离与鉴定. 食品工业科技, 2017, 38(14):141-145.
YIN X, GUO X F, PATIGULI·M, LIU J F, ZHANG X P, XI L Q, CHENG L. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from Chinese traditional sourdough. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, 38(14):141-145.(in Chinese)
[15]   LI D, Ni K, PANG H, WANG Y, CAI Y, JIN Q. Identification and antimicrobial activity detection of lactic acid bacteria isolated from corn stover silage. Asian-Australas Journal of Animal Sciences, 2015, 28(5):620-631.
[16]   ZHANG Q, LI X J, ZHAO M M, YU Z. Isolating and evaluating lactic acid bacteria strains for effectiveness of Leymus chinensis silage fermentation. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2014, 59(4): 391.
[17]   PHOLSEN S, KHOTA W, PANG H, HIGGS D, CAI Y. Characterization and application of lactic acid bacteria for tropical silage preparation. Animal Science Journal, 2016, 87(10): 1202-1211.
[18]   YANG J, TAN H, CAI Y. Characteristics of lactic acid bacteria isolates and their effect on silage fermentation of fruit residues. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, 99(7):5325-5334.
[19]   YULIANA N, DIZON E I. Phenotypic Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria isolated from Tempoyak (Fermented Durian) made in the Philippines. International Journal of Biology, 2011, 3(2): 145-152.
[20]   NI K, WANG Y, LI D, CAI Y, PANG H. Characterization, identification and application of Lactic Acid Bacteria isolated from forage paddy rice silage. PLoS One, 2015, 10(3):e0121967.
[21]   CHIQUETTE J, LAGROST J, GIRARD C L, TALBOT G, LI S, PLAIZIER J C. Efficacy of the direct-fed microbial Enterococcus faecium alone or in combination with Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Lactococcus lactis during induced subacute ruminal acidosis. Journal of Dairy Science, 2015, 98(1):190-203.
[22]   辛迎雪. 发酵饲料专用微生物的筛选研究[D].长春:吉林农业大学, 2015.
XIN Y X. Screen and use of special microorganism fermenting feedstuff[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[23]   ELLIS J L, HINDRICHSEN I K, KLOP G, KINLEY R D, MILORA N, BANNINK A. Effects of lactic acid bacteria silage inoculation on methane emission and productivity of Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, 99(9):7159.
[24]   MANGWE M C, RANGUBHET K T, MLAMBO V, YU B, CHIANG H I. Effects of Lactobacillus formosensis S215T and Lactobacillus buchneri on quality and in vitro ruminal biological activity of condensed tannins in sweet potato vines silage. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2016, 121(5):1242.
[25]   杜志琳, 尹望, 李雪平. 一株布氏乳杆菌的分离鉴定. 饲料研究, 2017(7):12-15.
DU Z L, YIN W, LI X P. Isolation and identification of a strain of Brucella. Feed Research, 2017 (7):12-15.(in Chinese)
[1] LIN Ping, WANG KaiLiang, YAO XiaoHua, REN HuaDong. Development of DNA Molecular ID in Camellia oleifera Germplasm Based on Transcriptome-Wide SNPs [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 217-235.
[2] WANG MengRui, LIU ShuMei, HOU LiXia, WANG ShiHui, LÜ HongJun, SU XiaoMei. Development of Artificial Inoculation Methodology for Evaluation of Resistance to Fusarium Crown and Root Rot and Screening of Resistance Sources in Tomato [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 707-718.
[3] HUANG Chong,HOU XiangJun. Crop Classification with Time Series Remote Sensing Based on Bi-LSTM Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4144-4157.
[4] DUAN CanXing,CAO YanYong,DONG HuaiYu,XIA YuSheng,LI Hong,HU QingYu,YANG ZhiHuan,WANG XiaoMing. Precise Characterization of Maize Germplasm for Resistance to Pythium Stalk Rot and Gibberella Stalk Rot [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(2): 265-279.
[5] YANG JingYa,HU Qiong,WEI HaoDong,CAI ZhiWen,ZHANG XinYu,SONG Qian,XU BaoDong. Consistency Analysis of Classification Results for Single and Double Cropping Rice in Southern China Based on Sentinel-1/2 Imagery [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3093-3109.
[6] WANG LuWei,SHEN ZhiJun,LI HeHuan,PAN Lei,NIU Liang,CUI GuoChao,ZENG WenFang,WANG ZhiQiang,LU ZhenHua. Analysis of Genetic Diversity of 79 Cultivars Based on SSR Fluorescence Markers for Peach [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 3002-3017.
[7] MENG Yu,WEN PengFei,DING ZhiQiang,TIAN WenZhong,ZHANG XuePin,HE Li,DUAN JianZhao,LIU WanDai,FENG Wei. Identification and Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Wheat Varieties Based on Thermal Infrared Image [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2538-2551.
[8] ZHANG WeiDong,ZHENG YuJie,GE Wei,ZHANG YueLang,LI Fang,WANG Xin. Identification of Cashmere Dermal Papilla Cells Based on Single- Cell RNA Sequencing Technology [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2436-2446.
[9] XU Xiao,REN GenZeng,ZHAO XinRui,CHANG JinHua,CUI JiangHui. Accurate Identification and Comprehensive Evaluation of Panicle Phenotypic Traits of Landraces and Cultivars of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(11): 2092-2108.
[10] LIU Chuang,GAO Zhen,YAO YuXin,DU YuanPeng. Functional Identification of Grape Potassium Ion Transporter VviHKT1;7 Under Salt Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1952-1963.
[11] XI Ling, WANG YuQi, YANG Xiu, ZHU Wei, CHEN GuoYue, WANG Yi, QIN Peng, ZHOU YongHong, KANG HouYang. Evaluation of Resistance to Stripe Rust and Molecular Detection of Resistance Gene(s) in 243 Common Wheat Landraces from the Yunnan Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 684-695.
[12] ZHANG PengFei,SHI LiangYu,LIU JiaXin,LI Yang,WU ChengBin,WANG LiXian,ZHAO FuPing. Advance in Genome-Wide Scan of Runs of Homozygosity in Domestic Animals [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(24): 5316-5326.
[13] CHEN DouDou, GUAN LiPing, HE LiangLiang, SONG YinHua, ZHANG Peng, LIU SanJun. Commonality Identification of Molecular Markers Linked to Seedless Genes in Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(22): 4880-4893.
[14] LI Qing,YU HaiPeng,ZHANG ZiHao,SUN ZhengWen,ZHANG Yan,ZHANG DongMei,WANG XingFen,MA ZhiYing,YAN YuanYuan. Optimization of Cotton Mesophyll Protoplast Transient Expression System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4514-4524.
[15] YAO Qing,YAO Bo,LÜ Jun,TANG Jian,FENG Jin,ZHU XuHua. Research on Fine-Grained Image Recognition of Agricultural Light- Trap Pests Based on Bilinear Attention Network [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(21): 4562-4572.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!