Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (24): 4916-4923.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.24.006

• PLANT PROTECTION • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Imazethapyr on Millet Jigu 33 Growth and Its Safety on Succeeding Crops

ZHANG Ting, SHI Zhi-gang, WANG Gen-ping, CHENG Ru-hong, CHEN Yuan, JI Xiao-mian, YANG Wei-hong   

  1. National Foxtail Millet Improvement Center/Institute of Millet Crops, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Cereal Crops Laboratory of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050035
  • Received:2015-06-25 Online:2015-12-16 Published:2015-12-16

Abstract: 【Objective】 Jigu 33 is a new imazethapyr-resistant millet variety. Chemical seedling thinning and weed control can be realized by applying proper imazethapyr herbicides in large-scale cultivation and production. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of imazethapyr on the growth of millet Jigu 33 and its safety on succeeding crops, and to provide references for the application and promotion of Jigu 33.【Method】The experiment was carried out at the Qiema test station of the Institute of Millet Crops of Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences with 6 dose levels of imazethapyr (0, 56.25, 75, 112.5, 150, 225 g a.i./hm2) from May 2013 to June 2015. The effect of imazethapyr on millet Jigu 33 growth was tested in the field. Jigu 33 seedling height and fresh weight were investigated on 7, 10, 13, 16, 20, 25 and 30 DAS (days after spraying); plant height, spike length, spike diameter and yield were investigated in the mature period; the residue of imazethapyr in millet, chaff, plant and soil were detected. Its safety on succeeding crops (Chinese cabbage, Jigu 19, Jigu 33, sugar beet, sorghum, maize, wheat and cotton) was tested on 30, 60 days and 1 year after sowing in net room.【Result】The growth of millet Jigu33 was normal at 56.25 to 225 g a.i./hm2 and there was no evident injury. The effect on Jigu 33 seedling height and fresh weight in different periods after spraying showed that there was no obvious difference between the treatment and control. The sensitive period for seedling height was at the early jointing stage from 13 to 16 DAS, and the sensitive period for seedling weight was on the late jointing stage and the early jointing stage from 20 to 25 DAS. Then the inhibition was lightened gradually, and the growth of millet Jigu 33 was normal at harvest time, the yield of which was higher than the control. The residue was only detected in plant at 225 g a.i./hm2 dose level with (0.01±0.006) mg?kg-1, which was less than LOQ. The inhibition on the succeeding crops was also lightened gradually as time progressed. The plant height of the succeeding crops one year after sowing had significant differences. Of all the succeeding crops, Chinese cabbage and sorghum were sensitive with significant yield loss. In the spraying imazethapyr field in the summer millets region, the rotation cropping of Jigu 33 could be wheat, maize and cotton.【Conclusion】The growth and yield of millet Jigu 33 was normal at 56.25 to 225 g a.i./hm2. The inhibition on the succeeding crops was lightened gradually as time progressed. The rotation cropping of Jigu 33 could be wheat, maize and cotton. In production, more attention should be paid to the control of the dosage and the rational rotation.

Key words: imazethapyr, millet Jigu 33, growth and development, succeeding crops, safety

[1]    师志刚, 夏雪岩, 刘正理, 程汝宏. 谷子抗咪唑乙烟酸新种质的初步研究. 河北农业科学, 2010, 14(11): 133-134, 136.
Shi Z G, Xia X Y, Liu Z L, Cheng R H. Preliminary study on new imazethapyr resistant foxtail millet germplasm. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 14(11): 133-134, 136. (in Chinese)
[2]    Zhang T, Shi Z G, Chen Y, Xia X Y, Xiang J Y, Geng G T, Cheng R H. Study on safe dosage of imazethapyr for an imazethapyr resistant millet variety and its effect on weed control. Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013, 14(6): 911-914.
[3]    张昌朋. 除草剂咪唑乙烟酸对土壤微生物多样性影响及环境行为研究[D].北京: 中国农业科学院, 2010.
Zhang C P. Effects of herbicide imazethapyr on soil microbial diversity and environmental behavior[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2010. (in Chinese)
[4]    苏少泉. 长残留除草剂对后茬作物安全性问题. 农药, 1998, 37(12): 4-7.
Su S Q. The influence on the subsequent crops of long residue herbicides. Pesticides, 1998, 37(12): 4-7. (in Chinese)
[5]    李慧, 丁伟, 姜俊凤, 王怀彪. 咪唑乙烟酸抑制大豆根瘤固氮酶活性的机理研究. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(19): 4173-4178.
Li H, Ding W, Jiang J F, Wang H B. Research on the inhibitory mechanism of imazethapyr to nodule nitrogenase activity in soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(19): 4173-4178. (in Chinese)
[6]    丁伟, 曹丽娟, 程茁. 咪唑乙烟酸对大豆根瘤固氮酶和硝酸还原酶活性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(20): 4192-4197.
Ding W, Cao L J, Cheng Z. Effect of imazethapyr on nodule nitrogenase and nitrate reductase activity in soybean. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(20): 4192-4197. (in Chinese)
[7]    苏少泉. 长残留除草剂在土壤中的分解及其使用中带来的严重问题. 农化新世纪, 2008(4): 24-26.
Su S Q. Decomposition of long residual herbicides in the soil and its serious problems. The New Century of Agrochememicals, 2008(4): 24-26. (in Chinese)
[8]    王险峰. 进口农药应用手册. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 429-435.
Wang X F. Import Pesticide Application Manual. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 429-435. (in Chinese)
[9]    孙立晨, 何娟, 黄立坤, 董世臣. 咪唑乙烟酸在豆科作物间作田的除草效果及其对豆科作物生长的影响. 中国植保导刊, 2010, 30(3): 39-42.
Sun L C, He J, Huang L K, Dong S C. Weed control effect of imazethapyr and its safety for leguminous crop. China Plant Protection, 2010, 30(3): 39-42. (in Chinese)
[10]   李颖, 王英姿. 10%咪唑乙烟酸水剂防除大豆田杂草药效试验. 农药研究与应用, 2008, 12(4): 35-37.
Li Y, Wang Y Z. Efficacy of 10% imazethapyr AS against weeds in soybean field. Agrochemicals Research and Application, 2008, 12(4): 35-37. (in Chinese)
[11]   王学东. 除草剂咪唑烟酸在非耕地环境中的降解及代谢研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2003.
Wang X D. Study on degradation and metabolism of imazapyr in uncultivated land ecosystem[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2003. (in Chinese)
[12]   Oufqir S, El Madani M, El Belghiti M A, Zrineh A, El Azzouzi M. Adsorption of imazethapyr on six agricultural soils of Morocco: evaluation of the impact of soil properties. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2013, 11: 030.
[13]   田发军, 吴艳兵, 赵欢欢, 赵俊俊. 土壤微生物降解咪唑啉酮类除草剂研究进展. 河南农业科学, 2014, 43(7): 1-5.
Tian F J, Wu Y B, Zhao H H, Zhao J J. Progress on degradation of idazolinone herbicides by soil microorganisms. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 43(7): 1-5. (in Chinese)
[14]   Loux M M, Reese K D. Effect of soil type and pH on persistence and carryover of imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technology, 1993, 7(2): 452-458.
[15]   黄春艳, 陈铁保, 王宇, 孙宝宏, 杨绍. 咪唑啉酮类除草剂对后茬作物安全性研究初报. 农药学学报, 2001, 3(2): 29-34.
Huang C Y, Chen T B, Wang Y, Sun B H, Yang S Y. Study on safety of imidazolinone herbicides to succeeding crops. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2001, 3(2): 29-34. (in Chinese)
[16]   赵长山, 何付丽. 长残留性除草剂与黑龙江省农业的未来发展. 东北农业大学学报, 2007, 38(1): 136-139.
Zhao C S, He F L. Effects of long residue herbicides on agricultural development of Heilongjiang Province. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2007, 38(1): 136-139. (in Chinese)
[17]   李荫梅. 谷子育种学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1997: 117-129.
Li Y M. Millet Breeding. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1997: 117-129. (in Chinese)
[18]   齐玉志, 相德臻. 谷子优质高产新技术. 北京: 金盾出版社, 2009: 8-12.
Qi Y Z, Xiang D Z. New Technology of High Quality and High Yielding Millet. Beijing: Jindun Press, 2009: 8-12. (in Chinese)
[19]   Scarponi L, Alla M M N, Martinetti L. Consequences on nitrogen metabolism in soybean (Glycine max L.) as a result of imazethapyr action on acetohydroxy acid synthase. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1995, 43(3): 809-814.
[20]   Soltani N, Nurse R, Sikkema P. Effect of imazethapyr application timing in kidney and white bean. Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 4(12): 678-682.
[21]   王天宇, 石云素, 辛志勇, Darmency H. 抗除草剂谷子新种质的创制、鉴定与利用. 中国农业科技导报, 2000, 2(5): 62-66.
Wang T Y, Shi Y S, Xin Z Y, Darmency H. A creation, evaluation and utilization of the new crop germplasm: herbicide resistanee foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2000, 2(5): 62-66. (in Chinese)
[22]   王友华, 马雷. 美国稻米分级标准与检测技术研究. 粮食与饲料工业, 2007(4): 5-8.
Wang Y H, Ma L. A study on American rice grading standards and detecting technology.Cereal and Feed Industry, 2007(4): 5-8. (in Chinese)
[23]   钱允辉, 王志强, 张夕林, 陆自强. 中后期相关农药使用次数与农药残留量动态关系的研究. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(9): 2678-2685.
Qian Y H, Wang Z Q, Zhang X L, Lu Z Q. Studies on the dynamics of pesticide residues and application frequency at the middle-late stage of rice. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(9): 2678-2685. (in Chinese)
[24]   Avila L A, Teló G M, Ferreira R B, Marchesan E, Machado S L O, Rossato T L, Cezimbra D M, Rigão Jr. G. Non-tolerant rice production after using the clearfieldTM rice system. Planta Daninha, 2010, 28(1): 123-129.
[25]   Santos L, Pinto J, Piveta L, Noldin J, Galon L, Concenço G. Carryover effect of imidazolinone herbicides for crops following rice. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2014, 5: 1049-1058.
[26]   Moyer J R. Sulfonylurea herbicide effects on following crops. Weed Technology, 1995, 9(2): 373-379.
[27]   苏少泉. 除草剂在土壤中的降解与使用. 现代农药, 2004, 3(1): 5-8.
Su S Q. Herbicide degradation in soil and application. Modern Agrochemicals, 2004, 3(1): 5-8. (in Chinese)
[1] ZHANG ChengQi,LIAO LuLu,QI YongXia,DING KeJian,CHEN Li. Functional Analysis of the Nucleoporin Gene FgNup42 in Fusarium graminearium [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 1894-1903.
[2] CHEN Xi,LIU YingJie,DONG YongHao,LIU JinYan,LI Wei,XU PengJun,ZANG Yun,REN GuangWei. Effects of CMV-Infected Tobacco on the Performance, Feeding and Host Selection Behavior of Myzus persicae [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(8): 1673-1683.
[3] TongYu HOU,TingLi HAO,HaiJiang WANG,Ze ZHANG,Xin LÜ. Advances in Cotton Growth and Development Modelling and Its Applications in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1112-1126.
[4] ZENG XiaoShan,TANG GuoHua,XIE HongJun,ZHU MingDong,AO HeJun,CHEN Bo,LI FangTing,HAO Ming,XIAO Yan,FU HuiRong,ZHANG Jian,YU YingHong. Selection of PMS Rice Varieties and Application in Flooding Irrigation for Cadmium Reduction [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(17): 3561-3572.
[5] HUI YuanYuan,PENG HaiShuai,WANG BiNi,ZHANG FuXin,LIU YuFang,JIA Rong,REN Rong. Research Progress of Food-Borne Pathogen Detection Based on Electrochemical and Optical Aptasensors [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2419-2433.
[6] WANG XiaoBin, YAN Xiang, LI XiuYing. Environmental Safety Risk for Application of Anaerobic Fermentation Biogas Slurry from Livestock Manure in Agricultural Land in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(1): 110-139.
[7] HuiLin YU,Fang JIA,ZongHua QUAN,HaiLan CUI,XiangJu LI. Effects of Glyphosate on Weed Control, Soybean Safety and Weed Occurrence in Transgenic Herbicide-Resistant Soybean [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(6): 1166-1177.
[8] SHI TianPei,WANG XinYue,HOU HaoBin,ZHAO ZhiDa,SHANG MingYu,ZHANG Li. Analysis and Identification of circRNAs of Skeletal Muscle at Different Stages of Sheep Embryos Based on Whole Transcriptome Sequencing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(3): 642-657.
[9] WANG Yi,LI Miao,LI YongFeng,SUN Yuan,QIU HuaJi. Identification and Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Wild Boar Feces [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(14): 2964-2973.
[10] Jing LIU,Chao LI,JinXiong LIU,Rui HE,YanRong SUN. The Role of High-Level Biosafety Laboratories in Biosafety and Consideration About Their Development [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 74-80.
[11] ZHAO Man, TANG JinRong, NIU LinLin, CHEN Lin, LIANG GeMei. Ecological Safety Evaluation of Different Bt Proteins on the Predator Chrysopa pallens [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(9): 1541-1552.
[12] WANG XiaoBin,YAN Xiang,LI XiuYing,JI HongJie. Environmental Risks for Application of Phosphogysum in Agricultural Soils in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(2): 293-311.
[13] HUA WeiYi,LIU YiMing,XU Fei,LU YongQiang,KONG Mei,WANG HaiTing,HUANG HuiLi,WANG HongLei,WU LianYong,LI XiuBo. The Safety Evaluation of Cefalonium Intramammary Infusion (Dry Cow) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(2): 359-366.
[14] WANG XiaoBin, YAN Xiang, LI XiuYing, CAI DianXiong, LEI Mei. Environment Risk for Application of Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum in Soils in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(5): 926-939.
[15] JIA ShiRong. Risk Assessment and Regulation of Genetically Engineered Crops: History and Reformation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(4): 601-612.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!