Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (11): 2135-2141.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.11.007

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY·AGRICULTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Uncertainty Research of Remote Sensing Image Classification Using the Boundary Region-Based Modified Rough Entropy Model

 JING  Xia-1, 2 , WEI  Man-3, WANG  Ji-Hua-1, SONG  Xiao-Yu-1, HU  Rong-Ming-2   

  1. 1、National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097;
    2、College of Geomantic, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054;
    3、The Forth Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, Haikou 570203
  • Received:2013-11-24 Online:2014-06-06 Published:2014-04-03

Abstract: 【Objective】It is an effective technical method to obtain land cover information by remote sensing classification. Objective and reasonable evaluation of the uncertainty in remote sensing classification maps is significant to agricultural resources survey, crop yield assessment and other remote sensing applications. This study focuses on the problem of uncertainty evaluation for remote sensing image classification at the land cover scale. A new uncertainty evaluation criteria, boundary region-based modified rough entropy model (BMREM) is proposed based on the improvement of modified rough entropy model (MREM). 【Method】 The traditional MREM model measures the overall average uncertainty of the same class feature. But the classification uncertainty is mainly caused by the boundary between different feature classes in RS image. So, in this study, all pixels value range for class feature is replaced by the boundary range of one feature class in image. The rationality of the BMREM model is proved based on rough set theory. And then the BMREM model was established under the impact of boundary region on the uncertainty assessment in remote sensing image classification. Afterwards, the MREM model and the BMREM model are applied to evaluate the uncertainty of remote sensing classification results for one Landsat TM image and one IKONOS image, respectively. The theoretical conclusion was confirmed by uncertainty evaluation result using experimental data of different spatial resolution and different research areas.【Result】 Compared with the MREM model,the uncertainty caused by the classification knowledge can be better described using the BMREM model. So the uncertainty of remote sensing image classification is more reasonable and objective. The empirical results reveal that the irrationality of uncertainty assessment is not obvious using MREM model. It also can objectively measure the uncertainty problem of remote sensing image classification if the mixed pixel is more serious. But it is difficult to objectively evaluate the uncertainty of remote sensing image classification by MREM model if the ground objects distribution is more concentrated in study area and the area is relatively large.【Conclusion】This study proved that MREM model magnified the value of uncertainty caused by existence of boundary region from the theory analysis and model application. Yet the uncertainty generated by classification knowledge can be better depicted using the BMREM model. So the BMREM model measured the classification uncertainty at the scale of land cover classes more reasonably and accurately.

Key words: remote sensing image , classification , uncertainty , modified rough entropy , boundary region

[1]Gopal S, Woodcock C. Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1994, 60(2): 181-188.

[2]柏延臣, 王劲峰. 遥感数据专题分类不确定性评价研究: 进展、问题与展望. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(11): 1219-1225.

Bo Y C, Wang J F. Assessment on uncertainty in remotely sensed data classification: progresses, problems and prospects. Advances in Earth Science, 2005, 20(11): 1219-1225. (in Chinese)

[3]Steele B M, Winne J C, Redmond R L. Estimation and mapping of misclassification probabilities for thematic land cover maps. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998, 66: 192-202.

[4]McIver D K, Friedl M A. Estimating pixel-scale land cover classification confidence using nonparametric machine learning methods. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2001, 39(9): 1959-1968.

[5]柏延臣, 王劲峰. 遥感信息的不确定性研究-分类与尺度效应模型. 北京: 地质出版社, 2003.

Bo Y C, Wang J F. The Uncertain of Remote Sensing Information- Model of Classification and the Scale Effects. Beijing: Geological Press, 2003. (in Chinese)

[6]李三平, 葛咏, 李德玉. 遥感信息处理不确定性的可视化表达. 国土资源遥感, 2006(2): 20-25.

Li S P, Ge Y, Li D Y. Visualizing presentation of the attribute uncertainty in classified remotely sensed imagery. Remote Sensing for Land & Resource, 2006(2): 20-25. (in Chinese)

[7]巫兆聪. 粗集理论在遥感影像分类中的应用[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2004.

Wu Z C. Rough sets approach to remote sensing image processing and classification[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2004. (in Chinese)

[8]陈桂芬, 马丽, 董玮, 辛敏刚. 聚类、粗糙集与决策树的组合算法在地力评价中的应用. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(23): 4833-4840.

Chen G F, Ma L, Dong W, Xin M G. Applied research of combinatorial algorithm of clustering, rough set and decision tree method in productivity evaluation. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(23): 4833-4840. (in Chinese)

[9]Pan X, Zhang S Q, Zhang H Q, Na X D, Li X F. A variable precision rough set approach to the remote sensing land use/cover classification. Computers & Geosciences, 2010, 36(12): 1466-1473.

[10]李雯静, 邱佳, 龙毅. 粗集方法在地图综合中的应用. 测绘学报, 2012, 41(1): 298-301, 308.

Li W J, Qiu J, Long Y. Application of rough set theory in map generalization. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2012, 41(1): 298-301, 308. (in Chinese)

[11]Suresh G V, Reddy E V, Reddy E S. Uncertain data classification using rough set theory. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, 2012, 132: 869-877.

[12]Huang K Y. Applications of an enhanced cluster validity index method based on the Fuzzy C-means and rough set theories to partition and classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(12): 8757-8769.

[13]Liang J Y, Wang J H, Qian Y H. A new measure of uncertainty based on knowledge granulation for rough sets. Information Sciences, 2009, 179: 458-470.

[14]王向阳, 蔡念, 杨杰, 刘小军. 基于近似精度和条件信息熵的粗糙集不确定性度量方法. 上海交通大学学报, 2006, 40(7): 1130-1134.

Wang X Y, Cai N, Yang J, Liu X J. A new method for measuring uncertainty in rough sets. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2006, 40(7): 1130-1134. (in Chinese)

[15]刘斌, 陆华, 刘国涛. 遥感数据的粗集表示及分类. 四川理工学院学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 24(1): 102-104.

Liu B, Lu H, Liu G T. Classification and presentation of remote sensing data on rough set. Journal of Sichuan University of Science&Engineering: Natural Science Edition, 2011, 24(1): 102-104. (in Chinese)

[16]佟玉娥. 基于信息论和粗糙集理论的遥感影像分类不确定性度量[D]. 阜新: 辽宁工程技术大学, 2008.

Tong Y E. Uncertain measure in remote sensing image classification based on information theory and rough set[D]. Fuxin: Liaoning Technical University, 2008. (in Chinese)

[17]段瑞芳. 基于粗糙集的遥感影像分类中的不确定性问题研究[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2008.

Duan R F. Research on the uncertainties in the classification of remote sensing image based on rough set[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi University, 2008. (in Chinese)

[18]何亚群, 胡寿松, 朱江. 粗糙集中不确定性测量的修正粗糙熵方法. 海军工程大学学报, 2006, 18(4): 26-29.

He Y Q, Hu S S, Zhu J. Modified rough entropy method for measuring uncertainty in rough sets. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2006, 18(4): 26-29. (in Chinese)

[19]阳恋, 冯山. 一般二元关系中基于边界域的知识粗糙熵与粗集粗糙熵. 四川师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 31(3): 273-277.

Yang L, Feng S. Rough entropies of knowledge and rough set based on boundary region of general binary relation. Journal of Sichuan Normal University: Natural Science, 2008, 31(3): 273-277. (in Chinese)

[20]陈子春. 集值信息系统的知识发现与属性约简研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2011.

Chen Z C. The study of knowledge discovery and attributes reduction in set-valued information systems[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011. (in Chinese)

[21]梁吉业, 李德玉. 信息系统中的不确定性与知识获取. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.

Liang J Y, Li D Y. Uncertainty and Knowledge Acquisition in Information Systems. Beijing: Science Press, 2005. (in Chinese)

[22]Townsend P A. A quantitative fuzzy approach to assess mapped vegetation classifications for ecological applications. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 2000, 72: 253-267.

[23]张文修, 吴伟志, 梁吉业, 李德玉. 粗糙集理论与方法. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.

Zhang W X, Wu W Z, Liang J Y, Li D Y. Rough Set Theory and Methods. Beijing: Science Press, 2001. (in Chinese)

[24]程玉胜, 张佑生, 胡学钢. 基于边界域的知识粗糙熵与粗集粗糙熵. 系统仿真学报, 2007, 19(9): 2008-2011.

Cheng Y S, Zhang Y S, Hu X G. Entropy of knowledge and rough set based on boundary region. Journal of System Simulation, 2007, 19(9): 2008-2011. (in Chinese)

[25]柏延臣. 遥感信息提取的不确定性和尺度效应研究[D]. 北京: 中科院地理科学与资源研究所, 2002.

Bo Y C. Uncertainty and scale issues in information extraction from remotely sensed data[D]. Beijing: Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science, 2002. (in Chinese)
[1] YANG GaiQing, WANG LinFeng, LI WenQing, ZHU HeShui, FU Tong, LIAN HongXia, ZHANG LiYang, TENG ZhanWei, ZHANG LiJie, REN Hong, XU XinYing, LIU XinHe, WEI YuXuan, GAO TengYun. Study on Milk Quality Based on Circadian Rhythm [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(2): 379-390.
[2] HUANG Chong,HOU XiangJun. Crop Classification with Time Series Remote Sensing Based on Bi-LSTM Model [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(21): 4144-4157.
[3] GUO Can,YUE XiaoFeng,BAI YiZhen,ZHANG LiangXiao,ZHANG Qi,LI PeiWu. Research on the Application of a Balanced Sampling-Random Forest Early Warning Model for Aflatoxin Risk in Peanut [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3426-3436.
[4] SHEN Zhe,ZHANG RenLian,LONG HuaiYu,XU AiGuo. Research on Spatial Distribution of Soil Texture in Southern Ningxia Based on Machine Learning [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(15): 2961-2972.
[5] FENG JunJie,ZHAO WenDa,ZHANG XinQuan,LIU YingJie,YUAN Shuai,DONG ZhiXiao,XIONG Yi,XIONG YanLi,LING Yao,MA Xiao. DUS Traits Variation Analysis and Application of Standard Varieties of Lolium multiflorum Introduced from Japan [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(12): 2447-2460.
[6] ZHANG Qiao,WANG Ke. The Uncertainty of Agricultural Yield Risk Assessment and Agricultural Insurance Pricing: Literature Review and Wayforward [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(22): 4778-4786.
[7] MI XiaoTian,SHI Lei,HE Gang,WANG ZhaoHui. Fertilizer Reduction Potential and Economic Benefits of Crop Production for Smallholder Farmers in Shaanxi Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(20): 4370-4384.
[8] HUANG YuQing,SUN YanYan,LUO RongZheng,Awangcuomu ,LU SuWen,FAN XiuCai,WANG Chen,LIU ChongHuai,FANG JingGui. A New Classification Standard for Different Grape Cluster Shapes and Investigation on Cluster Shape Dynamic Development Process [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2389-2405.
[9] ZHAO Jing,LI ZhiMing,LU LiQun,JIA Peng,YANG HuanBo,LAN YuBin. Weed Identification in Maize Field Based on Multi-Spectral Remote Sensing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1545-1555.
[10] REN Tao,GUO LiXuan,ZHANG LiMei,YANG XuKun,LIAO ShiPeng,ZHANG YangYang,LI XiaoKun,CONG RiHuan,LU JianWei. Soil Nutrient Status of Oilseed Rape Cultivated Soil in Typical Winter Oilseed Rape Production Regions in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1606-1616.
[11] XU YongHong,CHEN Li,TANG Song,DING DeKuan,YANG YuHeng. Prediction of Suitable Area and Risk Analysis for Citrus Target Spot [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4430-4439.
[12] ZHONG Liang,GUO Xi,GUO JiaXin,HAN Yi,ZHU Qing,XIONG Xing. Soil Texture Classification of Hyperspectral Based on Data Mining Technology [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4449-4459.
[13] LI Ying,LEI QiuLiang,QIN LiHuan,ZHU AXing,LI XiaoHong,ZHAI LiMei,WANG HongYuan,WU ShuXia,YAN TieZhu,LI WenChao,HU WanLi,REN TianZhi,LIU HongBin. Impact of Soil Data with Different Precision on Water Quality and Flow Simulation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(16): 3319-3332.
[14] XU ShiWei,DI JiaYing,LI GanQiong,ZHUANG JiaYu. The Methodology and Application of Agricultural Monitoring and Early Warning Model Cluster [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(14): 2859-2871.
[15] JI XuSheng,LI Xu,WAN ZeFu,YAO Xia,ZHU Yan,CHENG Tao. Pixel-Based and Object-Oriented Classification of Jujube and Cotton Based on High Resolution Satellite Imagery over Alear, Xinjiang [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(6): 997-1008.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!