Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (16): 3319-3332.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.16.010

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Impact of Soil Data with Different Precision on Water Quality and Flow Simulation

LI Ying1,2(),LEI QiuLiang1(),QIN LiHuan1,ZHU AXing3,4,LI XiaoHong1,ZHAI LiMei1,WANG HongYuan1,WU ShuXia1,YAN TieZhu1,LI WenChao1,HU WanLi5,REN TianZhi6,LIU HongBin1   

  1. 1Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Nonpoint Source Pollution Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China
    2 Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese of Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    3Nanjing Normal University/Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China
    4Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
    5Institute of Agricultural Resources & Environment, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, China
    6Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2019-09-23 Accepted:2019-12-08 Online:2020-08-16 Published:2020-08-27
  • Contact: QiuLiang LEI E-mail:liying9391@126.com;leiqiuliang@caas.cn

RichHTML

11

PDF

388

Abstract:

【Background】 Watershed model is an important tool to study non-point source pollution, and the reliability of input data is an important factor to ensure the accuracy of the model estimation. Soil data, as one of the important input data of the watershed model, has a significant influence on the runoff process. The previous studies mainly focused on the water quantity and hydrological process, while the research on water quality needs more attention. Furthermore, the disagreements over appropriate resolution of the soil maps also existed in the previous studies. 【Objective】 The purpose of this study was to enrich the prior knowledge of modeling and to provide useful suggestion for data selection in watershed simulation. 【Method】 This paper employed the widely used SWAT (soil & water assessment tool) model as an example and simulated flow, sediment, TN (total nitrogen) and TP (total phosphorus) of Fengyu river basin by three types of soil data with different scales. The scales were used for soil data as follows: 1﹕50 000 (soil-1), 1﹕500 000 (soil-2) and 1﹕1 000 000 (soil-3). SWAT-CUP software was used to adjust parameters. Based on the above methods, the effects of soil data with different scales (1﹕50 000, 1﹕500 000 and 1﹕1 000 000) on HRU (hydrologic response unit) division, model parameters and water quality and quantity were studied. 【Result】 (1) Soil data with different scales had great influence on the result of the HRU division, and the sensitivity of the number of HRU division was related to the division threshold and soil map precision. (2) The calibration of model parameters could remarkably improve the simulation performance of the model. The simulation performance associated with simulated substance, and the highest precision soil map not had the best simulation performance. (3) The attributes of soil tended to be consistent with the increase of sub-watershed area. The variation of simulation results caused by different soils gradually tends to be steady with the increase of confluence area, and the calibration process could have a great effect when confluence area was small. 【Conclusion】 In summary, the precision of soil data should be selected according to the basin size and simulated substance, and the impact of spatial scale need to be considered.

Key words: soil data, uncertainty, SWAT model, water quality, flow, hydrologic response unit

Fig. 1

Location of Fengyu river watershed in Yunnan province, digital elevation model (DEM), land use and monitoring site"

Table 1

The resolution and source of spatial data"

数据类别 Data item 数据来源 Data source 比例尺 Scale 数据用途 Purpose
数字高程图
Digital elevation model		 国家基础地理信息中心
National geomatic center of China		 1﹕50000 坡度、河网的提取及流域的划分
Extracting slope, river network and watershed division
土地利用数据
Land use data		 大理州洱源县土地局（2003年）
Land Resources Bureau		 1﹕10000 获得流域内土地利用类型及比例
Land use information
水系图
Drainage map		 国家基础地理信息中心
National geomatic center of China		 1﹕250000 获得流域内水系分布情况
Distribution of river systems
土壤图（soil-1）
Soil map		 全国第二次土壤普查土壤图
The 2nd national soil survey		 1﹕50000 获得土壤类型及分布
Soil type and distribution
土壤图（soil-2）
Soil map		 全国第二次土壤普查土壤图
The 2nd national soil survey		 1﹕500000 获得土壤类型及分布
Soil type and distribution
土壤图（soil-3）
Soil map		 中国科学院南京土壤研究所
Institute of soil science, CAS		 1﹕1000000 获得土壤类型及分布
Soil type and distribution

Fig. 2

Soil maps of three scales and samples"

Table 2

Other input datasets and their sources"

数据类别 Data item 数据来源 Data source 数据用途 Purpose
气象数据
Weather data		 气象观测站
Weather station		 降水、气温、太阳辐射、风速等数据
Precipitation, temperature and so on
土壤属性数据
Soil properties data		 土种志,野外挖掘土壤剖面及采样实测
Annals of soil classification, soil profiles and samples		 获得土壤物理及化学属性数据
Soil physical and chemical properties
农田管理措施
Management information		 农户调查、统计资料
Survey and statistical data		 作物种植模式、施肥、灌溉和耕作情况
Field management data
农村生活污染及畜禽养殖
Living pollution and livestock farming		 农户调查、统计资料
Survey and statistical data		 农村污水、固废垃圾产生量及处理方式,畜禽养殖
规模及其粪便处理方式等
Waste water, solid waste and livestock data

Table 3

Hydrologic cycle parameters and their initial ranges"

参数
Parameter		 参数说明
Parameter description		 初始阈值
Initial threshold
R_CN2.mgt 水分条件Ⅱ时的初始SCS径流曲线数 Initial SCS runoff curve number for moisture condition II -1 0.5
V_ALPHA_BF.gw 基流α因子 Baseflow alpha factor 0 1
V_RCHRG_DP.gw 深层含水层的渗透系数 Deep aquifer percolation fraction 0 1
V_GW_REVAP.gw 地下水的revap系数 Groundwater “revap” coefficient 0.02 0.2
V_GW_DELAY.gw 地下水的时间延迟 Groundwater delay time 0 500
V_GWQMN.gw 发生回归流的浅层含水层的水位阈值
Threshold depth of water in the shallow aquifer required for return flow to occur		 0 5000
V_SHALLST.gw 浅层含水层的初始水深 Initial depth of water in the shallow aquifer 0 50000
V_DEEPST.gw 深层含水层的初始水深 Initial depth of water in the deep aquifer 0 50000
V_SLSUBBSN.hru 平均坡长 Average slope length 10 150
V_OV_N.hru 坡面漫流的曼宁系数n值 Manning’s “n” value for overland flow 0.01 30
V_ESCO.hru 土壤蒸发补偿因子 Soil evaporation compensation factor 0.01 1
V_LAT_TTIME.hru 侧向流的运动时间 Lateral flow travel time 0 180
V_EPCO.hru 植物吸收补偿因子 Plant uptake compensation factor 0 1
V_HRU_SLP.hru 平均比降 Average slope steepness 0 1
V_CH_N2.rte 主河道的曼宁系数n值 Manning’s “n” value for the main channel -0.01 0.3
V_FFCB.bsn 初始土壤蓄水量 Initial soil water storage 0 1
V_SURLAG.bsn 地表径流滞后系数 Surface runoff lag coefficient 0.05 24

Table 4

Nutrients parameters and their initial ranges"

参数
Parameter		 参数说明
Parameter description		 初始阈值
Initial threshold
V_BIOMIX.mgt 生物混合效率 Biological mixing efficiency 0 1
V_FRT_SURFACE.mgt 表层10 mm土壤中的施肥量占施肥总量的分数 Fraction of fertilizer applied to top 10 mm of soil 0 1
V_FILTERW.mgt 过滤带宽度 Width of edge-of-field filter strip 0 100
V_GWSOLP.gw 向子流域河流输入的地下水中可溶性磷浓度
Concentration of soluble phosphorus in groundwater contribution to streamflow from subbasin		 0 1000
V_ERORGN.hru 泥沙运移中有机氮的富集比 Organic N enrichment ratio for loading with sediment 0 5
V_ERORGP.hru 泥沙运移中有机磷的富集比 Phosphorus enrichment ratio for loading with sediment 0 5
V_CDN.bsn 反硝化指数速率系数 Denitrification exponential rate coefficient 0 3
V_SDNCO.bsn 发生反硝化作用的土壤含水量阈值 Denitrification threshold water content 0 1
V_RSDCO.bsn 残留物的分解系数 Residue decomposition coefficient 0.02 0.1
V_PPERCO.bsn 磷的渗流系数 Phosphorus percolation coefficient in soil layer 10 17.5
V_PHOSKD.bsn 磷的土壤分配系数 Phosphorus soil partitioning coefficient 100 200
V_NPERCO.bsn 硝酸盐的渗流系数 Nitrate percolation coefficient 0 1
V_BC1_BSN.bsn NH3生物氧化的速率常数 Rate constant for biological oxidation of NH3 0.1 1
V_BC2_BSN.bsn 从NO2到NO3的生物氧化速率常数 Rate constant for biological oxidation NO2 to NO3 0.1 1
V_BC3_BSN.bsn 从有机氮到氨基的水解速率常数 Rate constant for hydrolysis of organic nitrogen to ammonia 0.02 0.4
V_BC4_BSN.bsn 从有机磷到可溶性磷的腐化速率常数 Rate constant for decay of organic phosphorus to dissolved phosphorus 0.01 0.7

Table 5

Sediment parameters and their initial ranges"

参数
Parameter		 参数说明
Parameter description		 初始阈值
Initial threshold
R_USLE_C.plant.dat USLE方程中的C因子的最小值 Minimum value of USLE C factor -10 10
V_USLE_P.mgt USLE方程中的P因子 USLE equation support practice factor 0 1
V_LAT_SED.hru 侧向流与地下径流中的泥沙含量 Sediment concentration in lateral and groundwater flow 0 5000
V_ADJ_PKR.bsn 子流域（支流）泥沙演算的最大流速调节因子 Peak rate adjustment factor for sediment routing in the subbasin 0.5 2

Table 6

Channel processes parameters and their initial ranges"

参数
Parameter		 参数说明
Parameter description		 初始阈值
Initial threshold
V_SPCON.bsn 最大泥沙量的线性参数 Linear parameter for calculating the maximum amount of sediment 0.0001 0.01
V_SPEXP.bsn 最大泥沙量的指数参数 Exponent parameter for calculating sediment restrained in channel sediment routing 1 2
V_CH_K2.rte 主河道冲积物的有效渗透系数 Effective hydraulic conductivity in main channel alluvium -0.01 500
V_CH_COV1.rte 河道侵蚀因子 Channel erodibility factor -0.05 0.6
V_CH_COV2.rte 河道覆盖因子 Channel cover factor -0.001 1
V_ALPHA_BNK.rte 河岸调蓄的基流α因子 Baseflow alpha factor for bank storage 0 1

Fig. 3

Effects of threshold settings on HRU numbers based on the difference soil datasets"

Table 7

Model parameters from different soil data"

土壤数据
Soil data		 SCS径流曲线数CN2
 最大根系深度
SOL_ZMX
(mm)		 土层埋深
SOL_Z
(mm)		 湿容重
SOL_BD
(g·cm-3)		 有效含水量SOL_AWC
(mm·mm-1)		 饱和渗透系数SOL_K
(mm·h-1)		 土壤侵蚀K因子USLE_K
soil-1 72.93 722.73 211.24 1.19 0.16 21.61 0.27
soil-2 77.43 879.93 160.66 1.15 0.36 42.56 0.29
soil-3 66.23 526.07 201.79 1.27 0.18 21.18 0.24

Table 8

Performance of the models before and after calibration"

土壤数据
Soil data		 项目
Item		 校准后 After calibration 校准前 Before calibration
R2 NS R2 NS
soil-1 流量Flow 0.81 0.68 0.84 -5.29
泥沙 Sediment 0.44 0.43 0.49 0.31
总氮Total nitrogen 0.58 0.57 0.50 -605.73
总磷Total phosphorus 0.53 0.53 0.30 -5007.4
soil-2 流量Flow 0.86 0.79 0.77 -6.86
泥沙 Sediment 0.46 0.41 0.50 0.1
总氮Total nitrogen 0.71 0.59 0.53 -710.97
总磷Total phosphorus 0.75 0.75 0.31 -1539.57
soil-3 流量Flow 0.75 0.64 0.86 -5.27
泥沙 Sediment 0.43 0.38 0.45 0.28
总氮Total nitrogen 0.85 0.69 0.49 -1097.61
总磷Total phosphorus 0.63 0.62 0.29 -5717.73

Fig. 4

Simulation performance for the three types of soil data after model calibration"

Fig. 5

Subbasin map"

Fig. 6

Differences between soil parameters from different soil data across varying subbasin areas"

Fig. 7

Differences in simulation results based on different soil data across varying subbasin areas"

[1] 中华人民共和国生态环境部. 中国环境状况公报. 环保工作资料选, 2017: 17-31.
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. Bulletin on the state of China's environment. Environmental Performance Information, 2017: 17-31. (in Chinese)
[2] 赵永宏, 邓祥征, 战金艳, 席北斗, 鲁奇. 我国湖泊富营养化防治与控制策略研究进展. 环境科学与技术, 2010,33(3):92-98.
ZHAO Y H, DENG X Z, ZHAN J Y, XI B D, LU Q. Progress on preventing and controlling strategies of lake eutrophication in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010,33(3):92-98. (in Chinese)
[3] HOWARTH R, CHAN F, CONLEY D J, GARNIER J, DONEY S C, MARINO R, BILLEN G. Coupled biogeochemical cycles: eutrophication and hypoxia in temperate estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2011,9(1):18-26.
[4] ROY J W, BICKERTON G. Elevated dissolved phosphorus in riparian groundwater along gaining urban streams. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014,48(3):1492-1498.
pmid: 24422427
[5] MORSE N B, WOLLHEIM W M. Climate variability masks the impacts of land use change on nutrient export in a suburbanizing watershed. Biogeochemistry, 2014,121(1):45-59.
[6] 陈亮, 董晓华, 李英海, 李中华, 刘冀, 薄会娟, 万浩, 蔡莉莉. 基于SWAT模型的黄柏河东支流域气候变化的水文响应研究. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2019(2):1-5.
CHEN L, DONG X H, LI Y H, LI Z H, LIU J, BO H J, WAN H, CAI L L. Hydrological response of climate change in east branch of Huangbaihe river based on SWAT model. Journal of China Three Gorges University(Natural Sciences), 2019(2):1-5. (in Chinese)
[7] 娄永才, 郭青霞. 岔口小流域非点源污染模型AnnAGNPS不确定性分析. 农业环境科学学报, 2018,37(5):956-964.
LOU Y C, GUO Q X. Uncertainty analysis of an AnnAGNPS model used in the Chakou watershed. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2018,37(5):956-964. (in Chinese)
[8] 罗娜, 李华, 樊霆, 郭彬, 李凝玉, 傅庆林, 马洁, 金跃群. HSPF模型在流域面源污染模拟中的应用. 浙江农业科学, 2019(1):141-145.
LUO N, LI H, FAN T, GUO B, LI N Y, FU Q L, MA J, JIN Y Q. Application of HSPF model in simulation of non-point source pollution. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019(1):141-145. (in Chinese)
[9] ZHANG X, HAO F, CHENG H, LI D. Application of swat model in the upstream watershed of the Luohe River. Chinese Geographical Science, 2003,13(4):334-339.
[10] 余红, 沈珍瑶. 非点源污染不确定性研究进展. 水资源保护, 2008,24(1):1-5.
YU H, SHEN Z Y. Uncertainty of non-point source pollution. Water Resources Protection, 2008,24(1):1-5. (in Chinese)
[11] 廖谦, 沈珍瑶. 农业非点源污染模拟不确定性研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2011,30(7):1542-1550.
LIAO Q, SHEN Z Y. Uncertainties in agricultural non-point source pollution simulation: Research progress. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011,30(7):1542-1550. (in Chinese)
[12] LI W, ZHAI L, LEI Q, WOLLHEIM W M, LIU J, LIU H, HU W, REN T, WANG H, LIU S. Influences of agricultural land use composition and distribution on nitrogen export from a subtropical watershed in China. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,642:21-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.048 pmid: 29894879
[13] 崔超. 三峡库区香溪河流域氮磷入库负荷及迁移特征研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2016.
CUI C. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus loadings into receiving water body and migration in Xiangxi river basin, Three Gorges Reservoir region[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2016. (in Chinese)
[14] 李润奎, 朱阿兴, 陈腊娇, 刘军志, 宋现锋, 林耀明. SCS-CN模型中土壤参数的作用机制研究. 自然资源学报, 2013,28(10):1778-1787.
LI R K, ZHU A X, CHEN L J, LIU J Z, SONG X F, LIN Y M. Effects of soil parameters in SCS-CN runoff model. Journal of Natural Resources, 2013,28(10):1778-1787. (in Chinese)
[15] DIEK S, TEMME A J A M, TEULING A J. The effect of spatial soil variation on the hydrology of a semi-arid Rocky Mountains catchment. Geoderma, 2014,235-236(4):113-126.
[16] WORQLUL A W, AYANA E K, YEN H, JEONG J, MACALISTER C, TAYLOR R, GERIK T J, STEENHUIS T S. Evaluating hydrologic responses to soil characteristics using SWAT model in a paired- watersheds in the Upper Blue Nile Basin. Catena, 2018,163:332-341.
[17] CHEN L, WANG G, ZHONG Y, SHEN Z. Evaluating the impacts of soil data on hydrological and nonpoint source pollution prediction. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,563-564:19-28.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.027 pmid: 19896162
[18] 叶许春, 张奇, 刘健, 李丽娇, 左海军. 土壤数据空间分辨率对水文过程模拟的影响. 地理科学进展, 2009,28(4):575-583.
YE X C, ZHANG Q, LIU J, LI L J, ZUO H J. Effects of spatial resolution of soil data on hydrological processes. Modeling Progress in Geography, 2009,28(4):575-583. (in Chinese)
[19] LI R K, RUI X P, ZHU A X, LIU J Z, Band L E, Song X F. Increasing detail of distributed runoff modeling using fuzzy logic in curve number. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015,73(7):3197-3205.
[20] 李润奎, 朱阿兴, 李宝林, 裴韬, 秦承志. 流域水文模型对土壤数据响应的多尺度分析. 地理科学进展, 2011,30(1):80-86.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.01.010
LI R K, ZHU A X, LI B L, PEI T, QIN C Z. Response of simulated stream flow to soil data spatial detail across different routing areas. Progress in Geography, 2011,30(1):80-86. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.01.010
[21] KUMAR S, MERWADE V. Impact of watershed subdivision and soil data resolution on SWAT model calibration and parameter uncertainty. Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2009,45(5):1179-1196.
[22] MENGISTU G, MCCRAY J E. Effects of soil data resolution on SWAT model stream flow and water quality predictions. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008,88(3):393-406.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.016 pmid: 17475392
[23] WANG X, MELESSE A M. Effects of STATSGO and SSURGO as inputs on SWAT Model's Snowmelt Simulation. Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2006,42(5):1217-1236.
[24] 庞燕, 项颂, 储昭升, 薛力强, 叶碧碧. 洱海流域农业用地与入湖河流水质的关系研究. 环境科学, 2015,36(11):4005-4012.
doi: 10.1021/es0200903
PANG Y, XIANG S, CHU Z S, XUE L Q, YE B B. Relationship between agricultural land and water quality of inflow river in Erhai Lake basin. Environmental Science, 2015,36(11):4005-4012. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.1021/es0200903
[25] 张辰, 陆建忠, 陈晓玲. 基于输出系数模型的云南洱海流域农业非点源污染研究. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,51(1):108-114.
ZHANG C, LU J Z, CHEN X L. Study of pollution from agricultural non-point sources in Lake Erhai watershed in Yunnan Province based on export coefficient model. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2017,51(1):108-114. (in Chinese)
[26] 张召喜. 基于SWAT模型的凤羽河流域农业面源污染特征研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013.
ZHANG Z X. Study on charateristics of agricultural non-point source pollution in Fengyu river basin on SWAT model[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013. (in Chinese)
[27] 李文超. 凤羽河流域农业面源污染负荷估算及关键区识别研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2014.
LI W C. Evaluating the loads of agricultural non-point source pollution and identifying critical source areas in Fengyu basin[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2014. (in Chinese)
[28] 龙爱华. SWAT 2009理论基础. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 2012.
LONG A H. Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 Soil&Water Assessment Tool. Zhengzhou: The Yellow River Water Conservancy Press, 2012. (in Chinese)
[29] SHARIFI A, LANG M W, MCCARTY G W, SADEGHI A M, LEE S, YEN H, RABENHORST M C, JEONG J, YEO I Y. Improving model prediction reliability through enhanced representation of wetland soil processes and constrained model auto calibration - A paired watershed study. Journal of Hydrology, 2016,541:1088-1103.
[30] MORIASI D N, ARNOLD J G, LIEW M W V, BINGNER R L, HARMEL R D, VEITH T L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007,50(3):885-900.
doi: 10.13031/2013.23153
[31] GOWDA P H, MULLA D J, NANGIA V, ALE S. Scale effects of STATSGO and SSURGO on flow and water quality predictions. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2013,5(3):266-274.
doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2013.53027
[32] CHAPLOT V. Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on SWAT runoff, sediment, and NO3--N loads predictions. Journal of Hydrology, 2005,312(1/4):207-222.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.017
[33] BARONI G, ZINK M, KUMAR R, SAMANIEGO L, ATTINGER S. Effects of uncertainty in soil properties on simulated hydrological states and fluxes at different spatio-temporal scales. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences, 2017,21(5):1-37.
[34] LI R, ZHU A, SONG X, LI B, PEI T, QIN C. Effects of Spatial Aggregation of Soil Spatial Information on Watershed Hydrological Modeling. Hydrological Processes, 2012,26:1390-1404.
doi: 10.1002/hyp.v26.9
[35] 李润奎, 朱阿兴, 秦承志, 陈腊娇, 刘军志. 土壤数据对分布式流域水文模型模拟效果的影响. 水科学进展, 2011,22(2):168-174.
LI R K, ZHU A X, QIN C Z, CHEN L J, LIU J Z. Effects of spatial detail of soil data on distributed hydrological modeling. Advances in Water Science, 2011,22(2):168-174. (in Chinese)
[36] 朱阿兴, 杨琳, 樊乃卿, 曾灿英, 张甘霖. 数字土壤制图研究综述与展望. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(1):66-78.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.008
ZHU A X, YANG L, FAN N Q, ZENG C Y, ZHANG G L. The review and outlook of digital soil mapping. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(1):66-78. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.008
[37] BOSSA A Y, DIEKKRUGER B, IGUE A M, GAISER T. Analyzing the effects of different soil databases on modeling of hydrological processes and sediment yield in Benin (West Africa). Geoderma, 2012, 173-174(2):61-74.
[38] 李润奎, 朱阿兴, Peter C. Augello, James E. Burt. SWAT模型对高精度土壤信息的敏感性研究. 地球信息科学学报, 2007,9(3):72-78.
LI R K, ZHU A X, PETER C A, JAMES E B. Sensitivity of SWAT model to detailed soil information. Geo-Information Science, 2007,9(3):72-78. (in Chinese)
[39] WAHREN F T, JULICH S, NUNES J P, GONZALEZ P O, HAWTREE D, FEGER K H, KEIZER J J. Combining digital soil mapping and hydrological modeling in a data scarce watershed in north-central Portugal. Geoderma, 2016,264:350-362.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.023
[40] ZIADAT F M, DHANESH Y, SHOEMATE D, SRINIVASAN R, NARASIMHAN B, TECH J. Soil-Landscape Estimation and Evaluation Program (SLEEP) to predict spatial distribution of soil attributes for environmental modeling. International Journal of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, 2015,8(3):1-15.
[1] YU QiLong,HAN YingYan,HAO JingHong,QIN XiaoXiao,LIU ChaoJie,FAN ShuangXi. Effect of Exogenous Spermidine on Nitrogen Metabolism of Lettuce Under High-Temperature Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(7): 1399-1410.
[2] MA YaMei,ZHANG ShaoHong,ZHAO JunLiang,LIU Bin. Function of FCS-Like Zinc-Finger Protein OsFLZ18 in Regulating Rice Flowering Time [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 3875-3884.
[3] LIU Xin,ZHANG YaHong,YUAN Miao,DANG ShiZhuo,ZHOU Juan. Transcriptome Analysis During Flower Bud Differentiation of Red Globe Grape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4020-4035.
[4] HU Xin, ZHANG ZhiLiang, ZHANG Fei, DENG Bo, FANG WeiMin. Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Hybrid Offsprings of Large-Flowered Tea Chrysanthemum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(20): 4036-4051.
[5] ZHANG YunXiu,JIANG Xu,WEI ChunXue,JIANG XueQian,LU DongYu,LONG RuiCai,YANG QingChuan,WANG Zhen,KANG JunMei. The Functional Analysis of High Mobility Group MsHMG-Y Involved in Flowering Regulation in Medicago sativa L. [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(16): 3082-3092.
[6] MA ShuanHong, WAN Jiong, LIANG RuiQing, ZHANG XueHai, QIU XiaoQian, MENG ShuJun, XU NingKun, LIN Yuan, DANG KunTai, WANG QiYue, ZHAO JiaWen, DING Dong, TANG JiHua. Candidate Gene Association Analysis of Maize Transcription Factors in Flowering Time [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(1): 12-25.
[7] YANG Min,XU HuaWei,WANG CuiLing,YANG Hu,WEI YueRong. Using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Targeted Mutagenesis of ZmFKF1 Delayed Flowering Time in Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(4): 696-707.
[8] YE Di,SHI Jiang,GAO ShuangCheng,WANG ZhanYing,SHI GuoAn. Correlation Analysis of Auxin Involved in the Process of Petal Abscission of Tree Peony Luoyanghong Cut Flowers by Ethylene Promoting [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(23): 5097-5109.
[9] ZHANG Qiao,WANG Ke. The Uncertainty of Agricultural Yield Risk Assessment and Agricultural Insurance Pricing: Literature Review and Wayforward [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(22): 4778-4786.
[10] WANG GuoLi,CHANG FangDi,ZHANG HongYuan,LU Chuang,SONG JiaShen,WANG Jing,PANG HuanCheng,LI YuYi. Effects of Straw Interlayer with Different Thickness on Saline-Alkali Soil Temperature, Water Content, and Sunflower Yield in Hetao Irrigation Area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(19): 4155-4168.
[11] MA ZhiMin,XU JianJian,DUAN Yu,WANG ChunQing,SU Yue,ZHANG Qi,BIN Yu,ZHOU ChangYong,SONG Zhen. Establishment of RT-RPA for Citrus Yellow Vein Clearing Virus (CYVCV) Detection [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3241-3249.
[12] JIAN TianCai,WU HongLiang,KANG JianHong,LI Xin,LIU GenHong,CHEN Zhuo,GAO Di. Fluorescence Characteristics Study of Nitrogen in Alleviating Premature Senescence of Spring Wheat at High Temperature After Anthesis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(15): 3355-3368.
[13] DU Qing,CHEN Ping,LIU ShanShan,LUO Kai,ZHENG BenChuan,YANG Huan,HE Shun,YANG WenYu,YONG TaiWen. Effect of Field Microclimate on the Difference of Soybean Flower Morphology Under Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(13): 2746-2758.
[14] DENG LiJuan,JIAO XiaoQiang. A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Nitrogen Management on Winter Wheat Yield and Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2355-2365.
[15] LI Hui,HAN ZhanPin,HE LiXia,YANG YaLing,YOU ShuYan,DENG Lin,WANG ChunGuo. Cloning and Functional Analysis of BraERF023a Under Salt and Drought Stresses in Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(1): 152-163.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备09089781号-30
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Tel: 86-010-82106279    E-mail: zgnykx@mail.caas.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd