Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 314-323.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.02.011

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect and Assessment of Controlled Release Fertilizer and Additive Treatments on Greenhouse Gases Emission from a Double Rice Field

 WANG  Bin, LI  Yu-E, WAN  Yun-Fan, QIN  Xiao-Bo, GAO  Qing-Zhu   

  1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/The Key Laboratory for Agro-Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2013-06-05 Online:2014-01-15 Published:2013-11-02

Abstract: 【Objective】It is well known that the issue of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission from rice ecosystem has been concerned within the scope of climate change research over years. The effect of controlled release fertilizer and additive treatments on GHGs emission and rice yield in a double rice (Oryza sative L) field was investigated to evaluate their potential of GHGs reduction and yield promotion, this study is also very important for the development of low-carbon agriculture and the mitigation research of global warming.【Method】Taking the double rice in Jianghan Plain, Hubei province, Central China as the object, a continuous observation of greenhouse gas emission from six different controlled release fertilizer or additive treatments (CK: conventional urea, CRU1: sulfur-coated urea, CRU2: polymer-coated urea, CU: nitrapyrin crystal urea, DMPP: nitrification inhibitor, EM: effective microorganisms) was conducted by using the automatic static chamber-GC (gas chromatography) method, the rice yield and soil properties were also monitored simultaneously. Variation and characterization of GHGs (CH4 and N2O) emission, greenhouse effect (CO2-e) and greenhouse gas intensity of each treatment were analyzed comprehensively.【Result】The results indicated that CH4 and N2O emission in different fertilizer treatments had an obvious daily and seasonal variation law in double rice ecosystem. Controlled release urea (polymer-coated) caused the lowest CH4 emission during the early rice, while the nitrapyrin crystal urea had the lowest CH4 emission during the late rice growing season. In consideration of N2O, the DMPP had the lowest emission during the two rice growing season compared to the other field applications. Pronounced differences were discovered among 6 treatments on global greenhouse effect (CO2-e,on 100 a horizon) during the whole rice growing season (P<0.05). Among the field applications, CRU1 had the lowest global greenhouse effect, followed by CU, EM, DMPP, CRU2, and CK, respectively. Furthermore, significant greenhouse effect reduction potential was also employed; the polymer-coated urea dominated the fashion with the highest reduction potential of 56.2% compared to traditional fertilization, followed by nitrapyrin crystal urea (45.6%). In the view of rice yield, five other treatments were significantly higher than CK during late rice (stimulated rice yield by 13.5%-16.2%) while no statistical differences were found during early rice. Additionally, GHGI of polymer-coated urea was statistically lower than the other applications including the conventional fertilization (P<0.01). 【Conclusion】Various reduction potential and yield promotion effects existed among different field applications from the double rice cropping system, this influence was significant during the late rice growing season but not remarkable in the early rice,while synthetically consideration of their economic earnings and environmental effects, the application of controlled release urea benefitted the most to the rice production, followed by nitrification inhibitor and biopreparate under the current field management conditions.

Key words: double rice , greenhouse gas intensity , controlled release urea , nitrification inhibitor , effective microorganisms

[1]IPCC. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

[2]Knoblauch C, Maarifat A A, Pfeiffer E M, Haefele S M. Degradability of black carbon and its impact on trace gas fluxes and carbon turnover in paddy soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43(9): 1768-1778.

[3]IRRI database. International Rice Research Institute online electronic database. http://ricestat.irri.org:8080/wrs2/entrypoint.htm, 2009.

[4]Blaylock A D, Kaufmann J, Dowbenko R D. Nitrogen fertilizer technologies. Western Nutrient Management, 2005, 6: 8-13.

[5]武志杰, 陈利军. 缓释/控释肥料: 原理与应用. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.

Wu Z J, Chen L J. Slow/Controlled Release Fertilizer: Principle and Application. Beijing: Science Press, 2003. (in Chinese)

[6]纪雄辉, 罗兰芳, 郑圣先. 控释肥料对提高水稻养分利用率和削减稻田土壤环境污染的作用. 磷肥与复肥, 2007, 22(2): 67-68.

Ji X H, Luo L F, Zheng S X. Effect of controlled release fertilizer on increasing rice nutrient use efficiency and minimizing environmental contamination of rice field. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2007, 22(2): 67-68. (in Chinese)

[7]Tang S H, Yang S H, Chen J S, Xu P Z, Zhang F B, Ai S Y, Huang X. Studies on the Mechanism of Single Basal Application of Controlled- Release Fertilizers for Increasing Yield of Rice. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2007, 6(5): 586-596.

[8]梁巍, 张颖, 岳进, 吴劼, 史奕, 黄国宏. 长效氮肥施用对黑土水旱田CH4和N2O排放的影响. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(3): 44-48.

Liang W, Zhang Y, Yue J, Shi Y, Huang G H. Effect of slow-releasing nitrogen fertilizers on CH4 and N2O emission in maize and rice fields in black earth soil. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2004, 23(3): 44-48. (in Chinese)

[9]李虎, 王立刚, 邱建军. 农田土壤N2O排放和减排措施的研究进展. 中国土壤与肥料, 2007, 5: 1-5.

Li H, Wang L G, Qiu J J. Studies of N2O emissions from croplands and strategies for reducing N2O emission. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2007, 5: 1-5. (in Chinese)

[10]林匡飞, 项雅玲. 湖北地区稻田甲烷排放量及控制措施的研究. 农业环境保护, 2000, 19(5): 267-270.

Lin K F, Xiang Y L. Methane Emission Flux from Paddy Fields and Its Control in Hubei. Agro-Envinronmental Protection, 2000, 19(5): 267-270. (in Chinese)

[11]李方敏, 樊小林. 控释肥对稻田甲烷排放的影响. 应用与环境生物学报, 2005, 11(4): 408-411.

Li F M, Fan X L. Effect of controlled release fertilizers on methane emission from paddy field. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental, 2005, 11(4): 408-411. (in Chinese)

[12]Yan X, Du L, Shi S. Nitrous oxide emission from wetland rice soil as affected by the application of controlled-availability fertilizers and mid-season aeration. Biology and fertility of Soils, 2000, 32: 60-66.

[13]Boeckx P, Xu X, van Cleemput O. Mitigation of N2O and CH4 emission from rice and wheat cropping systems using dicyandiamide and hydroquinone. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2005, 72(1): 41-49.

[14]Weiske A, Benckiser G, Herbert T, et al. Influence of the nitrification inhibitor 3, 4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) in comparison to dicyandiamide (DCD) on nitrous oxide emissions, carbon dioxide fluxes and methane oxidation during 3 years of repeated application in field experiments. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2001, 34(2): 109-117.

[15]刘昭兵, 纪雄辉, 彭华, 石丽红, 田发祥, 石生伟. 施氮量及抑制剂配比对双季稻生长期温室气体排放的影响. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(4): 919-925.

Liu Z B, Ji X H, Peng H, Shi L H, Tian F X, Shi S W. Effects of nitrogen amount and inhibitor ratio on greenhouse gas emission during double-rice growing season. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(4): 919-925. (in Chinese)

[16]苗曼倩, 朱超群, 莫天麟, 王月莲, 比嘉照夫. EM对稻田甲烷排放抑制作用的初步研究. 应用气象学报, 1998, 9(4): 462-469.

Miao M Q, Zhu C Q, Mo T L, Wang Y L, Teruo H. Preliminary study on the suppression effect of EM on methane emissions in paddy fields. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 1998, 9(4): 462-469. (in Chinese)

[17]Zheng X H, Wang M Y. Comparison of Manual and Automatic Methods for Measurement of Methane Emission from Rice Paddy Fields. Advance Atmospheres Science, 1998, 15(4): 569-579.

[18]万运帆, 李玉娥, 刘运通, 高清竹, 秦晓波, 刘硕, 马欣. 三开门自动温室气体测定箱的应用效果. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(9): 236-241.

Wang Y F, Li Y E, Liu Y T, Gao Q Z, Qin X B, Liu S, Ma X. The effect of a three-side-open automated chamber on greenhouse gas measurement. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27(9): 236-241.(in Chinese)

[19]李晶, 王明星, 陈德章. 稻田甲烷排放非连续测量中采样时间的选择. 中国科学院学报, 1998, 15(1): 24-29.

Li J, Wang M X, Chen D Z. Time selection for non-continuous measurements of methane emission from rice paddy fields. Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1998, 15(1): 24-29. (in Chinese)

[20]王跃思, 刘广仁, 王迎红. 一台气相色谱仪同时测定陆地生态系统CO2、CH4和N2O排放. 环境工程学报, 2003, 4(10): 84-89.

Wang Y S Liu G R, Wang Y H. Simultaneous measurement of CO2, CH4 and N2O emission from terrestrial ecosystem with one improved gas chromatography. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2003, 4(10): 84-89. (in Chinese)

[21]蔡祖聪, 徐华, 马静. 稻田生态系统CH4和N2O排放. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2009.

Cai Z C, Xu H, Ma J. CH4 and N2O Emission from Rice-based Ecosystems. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 2009. (in Chinese)

[22]Zhang A F, Bian R J, Pan G X, Cui L Q, Hussain Q, Li L Q, Zheng J W, Zheng J F, Zhang X H, Han X J, Yu X Y. Effects of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and greenhouse gas emission in a Chinese rice paddy: A field study of 2 consecutive rice growing cycles. Field Crops Research, 2012, 127: 153-160.

[23]刘晓雨, 李志鹏, 潘根兴, 李恋卿. 长期不同施肥下太湖地区稻田净温室效益和温室气体排放强度的变化. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(9): 1783-1790.

Liu X Y, Li Z P, Pan G X, Li L Q. Greenhouse gas emission and C Intensity for a long-term fertilization rice paddy in Tai Lake Region. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011, 30(9): 1783-1790. (in Chinese)

[24]Herzog T, Baumert K A, Pershing J. Target-Intensity: An Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Intensity Targets. World Resources Institute, Washington D.C., USA 2006.

[25]Cai Z C, Tsuruta H, Minami K. Methane emission from rice fields in China: Measurements and influencing factors. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2000, 105(13): 17231-17242.

[26]秦晓波, 李玉娥, 刘克樱, 万运帆. 不同施肥处理稻田甲烷和氧化亚氮排放特征. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(7): 143-148.

Qin X B, Li Y E, Liu K Y, Wan Y F. Methane and nitrous oxide emission from paddy field under different fertilization treatments. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2006, 22(7): 143-148. (in Chinese)

[27]黄树辉, 吕军. 区分土壤中硝化与反硝化对N2O产生贡献的方法. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(1): 48-51.

Huang S H, Lü J. Methods for the contributions of nitrification and denitrification to the production of nitrous oxide from soil. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005, 21(1): 48-51. (in Chinese)

[28]Shoji S, Kanno H. Use of polyolefin-coated fertilizers for increasing fertilizer efficiency and reducing nitrate leaching and nitrous oxide emissions. Fertilizer Research, 1994, 39(2): 147-152.

[29]Shoji S. Innovative use of controlled availability fertilizers with high performance for intensive agriculture and environmental conservation. Science in China series C: Life Sciences, 2005, 48(2): 912-920.

[30]Keerthisinghe D G, Freney J R, Mosier A R. Effect of wax-coated calcium carbide and nitrapyrin on nitrogen loss and methane emission from dry-seeded flooded rice. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1993, 16(1): 71-75.

[31]Zerulla W, Barth T, Dressel J, Erhardt K, von Locquenghien K H, Pasda G, Rädle M, Wissemeier A. 3, 4-Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP): a new nitrification inhibitor for agriculture and horticulture. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2001, 34(2): 79-84.

[32]王明星, 李晶, 郑循华. 稻田甲烷排放及产生、转化、输送机理. 大气科学, 1998, 22(4): 218-230.

Wang M X, Li J, Zheng X H. Methane emission and mechanisms of methane production, oxidation, transportation in the rice fields. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 1998, 22(4): 218-230.(in Chinese)

[33]Higa T, Wididana G N. The Concept and Theories of Effective Microorganisms. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, USA. 1991: 118-124.

[34]Wang B, Neue H U, Samote H P. Effect of cultivar difference (IR72, IR65598 and Dular) on methane emission. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 1997, 62(1): 31-40.
[1] ZHENG HuaBin,LI Bo,WANG WeiQin,LEI En,TANG QiYuan. Effects of Different Cultivation Models on Solar Radiation-Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of “Early Indica-Late Japonica” Double Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1565-1578.
[2] DING XiangPeng,LI GuangHao,ZHANG JiWang,LIU Peng,REN BaiZhao,ZHAO Bin. Effects of Base Application Depths of Controlled Release Urea on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Summer Maize [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(21): 4342-4354.
[3] ZHU CongHua, ZHANG YuPing, XIANG Jing, ZHANG YiKai, WU Hui, WANG YaLiang, ZHU DeFeng, CHEN HuiZhe. Effects of Side Deep Fertilization on Yield Formation and Nitrogen Utilization of Mechanized Transplanting Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(23): 4228-4239.
[4] PengFei LI, XiaoKun LI, WenFeng HOU, Tao REN, RiHuan CONG, ChangWen DU, LieHuo XING, ShaoHua WANG, JianWei LU. Studying the Fate and Recovery Efficiency of Controlled Release Urea in Paddy Soil Using 15N Tracer Technique [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(20): 3961-3971.
[5] ZHANG YaWei, LIU QiuXia, ZHU DanDan, FAN XiaoLin, REN Tao, ZHANG LiMei, LI XiaoKun, CONG RiHuan, LU JianWei. Effects of Different Special Controlled Release Urea Dosages on Yield and Nitrogen Uptake of Oilseed Rape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(1): 139-148.
[6] LIU KaiLou, ZHANG HuiMin, HAN TianFu, ZHOU LiJun, LI DaMing, HU ZhiHua, HUANG QingHai, YE HuiCai, XU XiaoLin, HU HuiWen. Effects of Long-Term Application of Chemical and Organic Fertilizers on Root Biomass and Nutrient in Double Cropping Rice System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(18): 3540-3547.
[7] XU Yu-xiu, GUO Li-ping, XIE Li-yong, YUN An-ping, LI Ying-chun, ZHANG Xuan, ZHAO Xun, DIAO Tian-tian. Characteristics of Background Emissions and Emission Factors N2O from Major Upland Fields in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(9): 1729-1743.
[8] LI Jian-ling, LI Yu-e, ZHOU Shou-hua, SU Rong-rui, WAN Yun-fan, WANG Bin, CAI Wei-wei, GUO Chen, QIN Xiao-bo, GAO Qing-zhu, LIU Shuo. Synergistic Effects of Water-Saving Irrigation, Polymer-Coated Nitrogen Fertilizer and Urease/Nitrification Inhibitor on Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Double Rice Cropping System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(20): 3958-3967.
[9] SONG Yuan-Yuan, CAO Ming, FAN Xiao-Lin. Nutrient Release Characteristics of Controlled Release Urea Coated by Vegetable Oil in the Soil at Four Stages of Banana Growing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(1): 80-88.
[10] SHI Mei, LIANG Dong-Li, MAN Nan, GUO Lu, ZHAO Wen-Long, WANG Chao-Hui. Effects of Different Application Rates of DMPP and DCD on Nitrogen Transformation in Calcareous Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(22): 4635-4642.
[11] DUAN Ju-Qi, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Climatic Suitability of Double Rice Planting Regions in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(2): 218-227.
[12] ZHU Bo, YI Li-Xia, HU Yue-Gao, ZENG Zhao-Hai, TANG Hai-Ming, XIAO Xiao-Ping, YANG Guang-Li. Effects of Ryegrass Incorporation on Fertilizer N Cycling in a Double Rice System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(13): 2764-2770.
[13] College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University/Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Slow-Controlled Release Fertilizers/State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Taian 271018, Shandong. Effects of Subsoiling and Urea Types on Water Use Efficiency of Different Maize Cultivars [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(9): 1963-1972.
[14] SHI Mei,ZHANG Mei-ting,SHEN Feng,LIANG Dong-li,DANG Hu-ling
. Effects of Nitrification Inhibitors on Nitrification Inhibition and Nitrite Accumulation in Calcareous Soil
[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(3): 500-506 .
[15] CHUAN Li-Min, AN Zhi-Zhuang, DU Lian-Feng, ZHAO Tong-Ke, LI Shun-Jiang. Effects of Urease/Nitrification Inhibitor on Soil Nitrogen Leaching Loss in Loamy Fluvo-Aquic Soil [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(19): 4007-4014.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!