Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (19): 3709-3720.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.19.004

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY·AGRICULTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Reduced Chlorophyll Content on Photoinhibition and Photosynthetic Electron Transport in Rice Leaves

ZHOU Zhen-xiang, LI Zhi-kang, CHEN Ying, WANG Zhi-qin, YANG Jian-chang, GU Jun-fei   

  1. College of Agriculture, Yangzhou University/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu
  • Received:2016-03-18 Online:2016-10-01 Published:2016-10-01

Abstract: 【Objective】The chlorophyll content of a chlorophyll-deficit rice mutant (YL) is significantly lower than its wild type (WT), but its photosynthetic electron transport rate and net photosynthetic rate are significantly higher than its WT. The aim of this study is to understand the physiological basis, and its potential use in high photosynthetic efficiency breeding was prospected.【Method】A pot experiment in the climate chamber at high light intensity (HL) and low light intensities (LL), and a field experiment were conducted. Chlorophyll fluorescence, the concentration of super oxygen anion and malodialdehyde, superoxide dismutase activity, light fluorescent and electron micrographs, canopy temperature were investigated. 【Result】 The results show that the chlorophyll content was significantly lower in the mutant than its WT, and the light treatment had different effects on chlorophyll content in the mutant and its WT. When compared the HL and LL treatments, the chlorophyll content was increased by 60% in the mutant, but decreased by 20% in the WT. The light response curves showed that the mutant has a higher photosynthetic capacity than its WT. At the irradiance of 1 000 µmol·m-2·s-1, the photosynthetic rate was 46.5% and 9.4% higher in the mutant than its WT, in HL and LL treatments, respectively. The chlorophyll fluorescence measurements indicate that the photosynthetic electron transport rate (ETR), photosystem Ⅱ efficiency (ΦPS), photosynthetic quenching (qP), and maximum efficiency of open photosystem Ⅱ in the light (F′v/F′m) were significantly higher in mutant than its WT. The content of oxygen anion and malondialdehyde were higher in WT than the mutant, especially in HL treatment, indicating photoinhibition in WT. The electron micrographs and light fluorescent micrographs of the mutant and its WT indicated that the chloroplast was to some extent harmed. The inter-vein distance was also found larger in WT than in the mutant, and the area of vascular bundle is smaller in WT than in the mutant, indicating a better water status in mutant than in its WT. The thermal image indicated that the canopy temperature was significantly lower in mutant than in its WT at noon with high irradiance. All the results suggested that the high chlorophyll content in the WT excessively absorbed light energy, causing photoinhibition (high oxygen anion and malondialdehyde content, reduced photosystem Ⅱefficiency and decreased SOD activity), and had a lower photosynthetic rate than the mutant. The excessively absorbed light energy also contributed the higher canopy temperature in WT than in mutant, which is adverse for canopy photosynthesis.【Conclusion】All these results implicate that selecting for moderate chlorophyll content in breeding would help avoiding the generation of reactive oxygen species and alleviating the photoinhibition, improving photosynthesis, especially at noon under high solar radiation.

Key words: rice, photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll, chlorophyll fluorescence, photoinhibition

[1]    Murchie E H, Pinto M, Horton P. Agriculture and the new challenges for photosynthesis research. New Phytologist, 2009, 181(3): 532-552.
[2]    Peng S, Khush G S, Virk P, Tang Q, Zou Y. Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Research, 2008, 108: 32-38.
[3]    Long S P. We need winners in the race to increase photosynthesis in rice, whether from conventional breeding, biotechnology or both. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2014, 37(1): 19-21.
[4]    Long S P, Marshall-Colon A, Zhu X G. Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell, 2015, 161(1): 56-66.
[5]    von Caemmerer S, Quick W P, Furbank R T. The development of C4 rice: current progress and future challenges. Science, 2012, 336(6089): 1671-1672.
[6]    Krause G H, Weis E. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 1991, 42(1): 313-349.
[7]    Murchie E H, Niyogi K K. Manipulation of photoprotection to improve plant photosynthesis. Plant Physiology, 2011, 155: 86-92.
[8]    Zhu X G, Long S P, Ort D R. Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2010, 61: 235-261.
[9]    Demao J, Xia L, Xueqing H, WEI C, TINGYUN K, MAURICE S B K. The characteristics of CO2 assimilation of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence in transgenic PEPC rice. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2001, 46(13): 1080-1084.
[10]   Ort D R, Merchant S S, Alric J, Barkan A, Blankenship R E, Bock R, Croce R, Hanson M R, Hibberd J M, Long S P. Redesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2015, 112: 8529-8536.
[11]   Ort D R, Zhu X G, Melis A. Optimizing antenna size to maximize photosynthetic efficiency. Plant Physiology, 2011, 155: 79-85.
[12]   Nakajima Y, Itayama T. Analysis of photosynthetic productivity of microalgal mass cultures. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2003, 15: 497-505.
[13]   Kirst H, Formighieri C, Melis A. Maximizing photosynthetic efficiency and culture productivity in cyanobacteria upon minimizing the phycobilisome light-harvesting antenna size. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2014, 1837:1653-1664.
[14]   Holden M. Chlorophyll// Goodwin T W. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Pigments.2nd ed. London: Academic Press, 1976: 1-37.
[15]   Genty B, Briantais J M, Baker N R. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1989, 990: 87-92.
[16]   Maxwell K, Johnson G N. Chlorophyll fluorescence-A practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2000, 51: 659-668.
[17]   RODRÍGUEZ-SERRANO M, ROMERO-PUERTAS M C, Zabalza A N A, CORPAS F J, GÓMEZ M, DEL RÍO L A, SANDALIO L M. Cadmium effect on oxidative metabolism of pea (Pisum sativum L.) roots. Imaging of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide accumulation in vivo. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2006, 29(8): 1532-1544.
[18]   王爱国, 罗广华, 邵从本, 吴淑君, 郭俊彦. 大豆种子超氧物歧化酶的研究. 植物生理学报, 1983, 9(1): 77-84.
Wang A G, Luo G H, Shao C B, Wu S J, Guo J Y. A study on the superoxide dismutase of soybean seeds. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 1983, 9(1): 77-84. (in Chinese)
[19]   赵世杰, 许长成, 邹琦, 孟庆伟. 植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进. 植物生理学通讯, 1994, 30: 207-210.
Zhao S J, Xu C C, Zou Q, Meng Q W. Improvements of method for measurement of malondialdehyde in plant tissues. Plant Physiology Communications, 1994, 30: 207-210. (in Chinese)
[20]   Zhao H, Kalivendi S, Zhang H, JOSEPH J, NITHIPATIKOM K, Vásquez-Vivar J, Kalyanaraman B. Superoxide reacts with hydroethidine but forms a fluorescent product that is distinctly different from ethidium: potential implications in intracellular fluorescence detection of superoxide. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2003, 34(11): 1359-1368.
[21]   刘占才, 牛俊英. 超氧阴离子自由基对生物体的作用机理研究. 焦作教育学院学报, 2002, 18(4): 48-51.
Liu Z C, Niu J Y. Research on the mechanism of the organism on superoxide anion. Journal of Jiaozuuo Institute of Education, 2002, 18(4): 48-51. (in Chinese)
[22]   Horton P. Prospects for crop improvement through the genetic manipulation of photosynthesis: morphological and biochemical aspects of light capture. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2000, 51: 475-485.
[23]   Li Y, Ren B, Gao L, DING L, JIANG D, XU X, SHEN Q, GUO S. Less chlorophyll does not necessarily restrain light capture ability and photosynthesis in a chlorophyll-deficient rice mutant. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2013, 199(1): 49-56.
[24]   Yin X, Struik P C. Constraints to the potential efficiency of converting solar radiation into phytoenergy in annual crops: from leaf biochemistry to canopy physiology and crop ecology. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, 62: 3489-3499.
[25]   Mu H, Jiang D, Wollenweber B, DAI T, JING Q, CAO W. Long-term low radiation decreases leaf photosynthesis, photochemical efficiency and grain yield in winter wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2010, 196(1): 38-47.
[26]   Geacintov N E, Breton J, Knox R S. Energy transfer and fluorescence mechanisms in photosynthetic membranes. Critical reviews in plant sciences, 1987, 5(1): 1-44.
[27]   Kok B. On the inhibition of photosynthesis by intense light. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1956, 21(2): 234-244.
[28]   Foyer C H, Noctor G. Leaves in the dark see the light. Science, 1999, 284(5414): 599-601.
[29]   Aro E M, Virgin I, Andersson B. Photoinhibition of photosystem II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics, 1993, 1143(2): 113-134.
[30]   Krause G H. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis. An evaluation of damaging and protective mechanisms. Physiologia Plantarum, 1988, 74(3): 566-574.
[31]   Barber J. Molecular basis of the vulnerability of photosystem II to damage by light. Functional Plant Biology, 1995, 22(2): 201-208.
[32]   Takagi D, Takumi S, Hashiguchi M, SEJIMA T, MIYAKE C. Superoxide and singlet oxygen produced within the thylakoid membranes both cause photosystem I photoinhibition. Plant Physiology, 2016, Doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00246.
[33]   HUANG W, YANG Y J, ZHANG J L, HU H, ZHANG S B. PSI photoinhibition is more related to electron transfer from PSII to PSI rather than PSI redox state in Psychotria rubra. Photosynthesis Research, 2016, 129(1): 85-92.
[34]   TIWARI A, MAMEDOV F, GRIECO M, SUORSA M, JAJOO A, STYRING S, TIKKANEN M, ARO E M. Photodamage of iron- sulphur clusters in photosystem I induces non-photochemical energy dissipation. Nature Plants, 2016, 2: 16035.
[35]   Clarke J E, Johnson G N.In vivo temperature dependence of cyclic and pseudocyclic electron transport in barley. Planta, 2001, 212(5/6): 808-816.
[36]   Ort D R, Merchant S S, Alric J, BARKAN A, BLANKENSHIP R E, BOCK R, CROCE R, HANSON M R, HIBBERD J M, LONG S P, MOORE T A, MORONEY J, NIYOGI K K, PARRY M A J, PERALTA-YAHYA P P, PRINCE R C, REDDING K E, SPALDING M H, VAN WIJK K J, VERMAASW F J, CAEMMERER S V, WEBWE A P M, YEATES T O, YUAN J S, ZHU X G. Redesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 2015, 112: 8529-8536.
[37]   Ort D R, Zhu X G, Melis A. Optimizing antenna size to maximize photosynthetic efficiency. Plant Physiology, 2011, 155: 79-85.
[38]   Polle J E, Kanakagiri S D, Melis A. tla1, a DNA insertional transformant of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with a truncated light-harvesting chlorophyll antenna size. Planta, 2003, 217: 49-59.
[39]   Melis A. Solar energy conversion efficiencies in photosynthesis: minimizing the chlorophyll antennae to maximize efficiency. Plant Science, 2009, 177: 272-280.
[40]   Sukenik A, Bennett J, Falkowski P. Light-saturated photosynthesis—limitation by electron transport or carbon fixation? Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics, 1987, 891(3): 205-215.
[41]   Long S P, ZHU X G, Naidu S L, ORT D R. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant, Cell & Environment, 2006, 29(3): 315-330.
[42]   Gu J, Yin X, Struik P C, STOMPH T J, WANG H. Using chromosome introgression lines to map quantitative trait loci for photosynthesis parameters in rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves under drought and well-watered field conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2012, 63(1): 455-469.
[43]   Griffiths H. Plant biology: designs on Rubisco. Nature, 2006, 441(7096): 940-941.
[1] PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2# and Changbai7# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2] CUI JieHao, ZHANG Meng, WANG Qin, YU JiaYan, LIN Kun, LI ShangZe, LAN Heng, GENG YanQiu, ZHANG Qiang, GUO LiYing, SHAO XiWen. Evaluation of Lodging Resistance and Its Physiological Mechanisms in Japonica Rice Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1420-1438.
[3] YUAN HaoLiang, NIE Jun, LI Peng, LU YanHong, LIAO YuLin, XU ChangXu, LI ZhongYi, CAO WeiDong, ZHANG JiangLin. Effects of Co-Utilization of Chinese Milk Vetch and Rice Straw on Soil Phosphorus Composition and Phosphorus Activation of Paddy Field in Southern China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1480-1491.
[4] XU YangHaoJun, CHEN LiMing, YANG ShiQi, TANG YiFan, TAN XueMing, ZENG YongJun, PAN XiaoHua, ZENG YanHua. Effects of Long-Term Different Straw Returning Methods on Soil Organic Carbon, Nutrients and Aggregate Formation in Different Soil Layers of Double Cropping Rice Field [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1492-1506.
[5] LI XingYu, HUANG Rong, XIAN YiMing, TIAN JiaoJiao, MA XiaoJin, YANG QiaoXi, LI Bing, WANG ChangQuan. Characteristics of Organic Carbon Fractions and Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Different Size Aggregates in Rice Field Soils in Response to Long-Term Fertilization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1255-1271.
[6] MA ZhaoHui, QUAN ChengZhe, CHENG HaiTao, YANG KanJie, LI XinRui, LÜ WenYan. The Breeding Goals and Strategies of Northeast Japonica Rice Under the Background of Zhongke Fa No.5 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 927-936.
[7] ZHANG WeiJian, YAN ShengJi, SHANG ZiYin, TANG ZhiWei, WU LiuGe, LI JiaRui, CHEN HaoTian, DENG AiXing, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Xin, ZHENG ChengYan, SONG ZhenWei. Methane Emissions from Paddy Fields: Not Entirely Attributable to Rice Cultivation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 824-833.
[8] CHEN Min, JIAO ZiLan, QIAO ChengBin, XU Hao, ZHANG Bi, MA DongHua, KONG WeiRu, WANG JingWen, SONG JiaWei, LUO ChengKe, LI PeiFu, TIAN Lei. Morpho-Physiological Responses and Adaptive Strategies of Rice Germplasm Accessions from Different Subspecies Under Salt Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 705-722.
[9] GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[10] LUO Wei, YU Hong, YUAN LiXin, WANG LingLing, ZHAO JinPeng, YIN Wei, WANG MingTian, WANG RuLin. Change of Geographic Distributions of Ratoon Rice in Sichuan- Chongqing Under Global Climate Change [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 765-780.
[11] ZHU Shu, GUO ZhiPeng, SUN Ying. Functional Analysis of Rice Target of Rapamycin OsTOR in Regulating Root Elongation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 475-485.
[12] LÜ WenYan, CHENG HaiTao, MA ZhaoHui, TIAN ShuHua. Discussion on Hybridization Breeding Technology and Strategy of Rice in the New Era of Breeding [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 233-238.
[13] LIAO TingLu, SHI YaFei, XIAO DongHao, SHE YangMengFei, GUO FuCheng, YANG JiuJu, TANG HaiJiang, LUO ChengKe. The Effect of Exogenous Nitroprusside on Sugar Metabolism in Rice Seedlings Under Alkaline Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 265-277.
[14] LIU TianSheng, LIU GengYuan, ZHAO AnQi, YANG Xu, CAI MingXue, YANG AiWen, LOU MingXuan, LI MuKai, WANG Han, ZHANG YaLing. Pathogenic Population of Rice Bakanae Disease in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 305-321.
[15] WANG ZhongNi, LEI Yue, LI JiaLi, GONG YanLong, ZHU SuSong. Functions of ABC Transporter OsARG1 in Rice Heading Date Regulation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 1-16.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!