光质和光周期对设施草莓生长调控的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.20.008

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】This study investigated the effects of far-red (FR), ultraviolet-A (UVA), and photoperiod on the growth, yield, and fruit quality of substrate-cultivated strawberry in a solar greenhouse, aiming to develop an efficient supplemental lighting strategy for winter-spring production in China.【Method】The experiment was conducted from September 2024 to February 2025 in a solar greenhouse in Beijing, using the cultivar Red Face in an elevated substrate cultivation system. LED supplementary lighting was initiated at the early stage of flower bud differentiation (November 18, 2024), with lamps positioned 20 cm above the canopy. Treatments included different light qualities (Red/Blue 9/1, Red/Blue 9/1+FR, White light, White light+UVA) and photoperiods (10 h and 16 h), all using 120 W LED lamps with a canopy photosynthetic photon flux density of 270-290 μmol·m^-2·s^-1 (FR at 25-30 and UVA at 15-20 μmol·m^-2·s^-1). Lamps were automatically controlled by sensors (on when natural PPFD <300, off when >500). No supplemental lighting served as control, with three replicates per treatment (each replicate being one 10 m cultivation ridge). Plant morphology, leaf photosynthesis, SPAD index, flower bud differentiation, yield components, fruit quality, and electrical energy use efficiency (EUE) were measured.【Result】Red/Blue 9/1+FR significantly improved plant architecture, light interception, and flower bud differentiation. It increased yield by 45.0% compared to control and by 11.8% compared to Red/Blue 9/1, achieving the highest EUE (51.5% higher than Red/Blue 9/1). White light+UVA promoted vegetative growth (aboveground dry weight and leaf area increased by 144% and 112%, respectively, compared to control), but reduced maximum net photosynthetic rate by 29.5%, total flower buds by 15.0%, and fruit set by 21.2% compared to white light, resulting in yield comparable to control and 23.2% lower than white light. Extending photoperiod to 16 h induced shade-avoidance responses, with leaf area and aboveground dry weight increased by 167% and 163% compared to control, total flower buds increased by 110.7%, and yield increased by 60.2% (45.6% higher than 10 h treatment), with EUE 142.5% higher than the 10 h treatment. All supplemental lighting treatments increased fruit titratable acid and soluble protein contents, while soluble sugar content under Red/Blue 9/1 and Red/Blue 9/1+FR was significantly higher than other treatments.【Conclusion】In winter-spring strawberry production in solar greenhouses, FR supplementation and extended photoperiod (16 h) are recommended to effectively improve yield, quality, and energy use efficiency, while UVA should be avoided.

Key words: LED supplementary lighting, strawberry, non-visible light, photoperiod, Chinese solar greenhouse

ZHANG Han, LI JingLai, ZHANG YuQi, GUO Jian, LI Xing, LI Tao. Effects of Light Quality and Photoperiod on Growth, Yield, and Quality of Substrate-Cultivated Strawberry in a Chinese Solar Greenhouse[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(20): 4531-4546.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Table 3

Fig. 7

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 8

References 44

[1]	刘畅, 王晓, 李宪松, 王俊芹. 我国草莓生产态势及国内外比较分析[J]. 中国果树, 2023(7): 136-140.
	Liu C, Wang X, Li X S, Wang J Q. Strawberry production situation in China and comparative analysis at home and abroad[J]. China Fruits, 2023(7): 136-140. (in Chinese)
[2]	张玄兵, 宋希强, 钟云芳, 李昌瑞. 我国温室发展概况[J]. 北方园艺, 2001(2): 1-2.
	Zhang X B, Song X Q, Zhong Y F, Li C R. Introduction to development of domestic conser vatory[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2001(2): 1-2. (in Chinese)
[3]	柴贵贤. LED在设施栽培中的应用和前景[J]. 种子科技, 2022, 40(7): 142-144.
	Chai G X. Application and prospect of LED in protected cultivation[J]. Seed Science & Technology, 2022, 40(7): 142-144. (in Chinese)
[4]	李涛, 杨其长. 设施园艺生产人工补光理论初探[J]. 农业工程技术, 2018, 38(16): 48-52.
	Li T, Yang Q C. Preliminary study on the theory of artificial light supplement in protected horticulture production[J]. Agricultural Engineering Technology, 2018, 38(16): 48-52. (in Chinese)
[5]	Choi H G, Moon B Y, Kang N J. Effects of LED light on the production of strawberry during cultivation in a plastic greenhouse and in a growth chamber[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2015, 189: 22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.03.022
[6]	杨肖芳, 张豫超, 苗立祥, 孙晨栋, 蒋桂华. LED补光对不同设施栽培草莓品种营养生长与果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(4): 864-869. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20221246
	Yang X F, Zhang Y C, Miao L X, Sun C D. Effects of LED supplementary light on the nutritional growth and fruit quality of strawberry varieties cultivated in different facilities[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(4): 864-869. (in Chinese)
[7]	刘庆, 连海峰, 刘世琦, 孙亚丽, 于新会, 郭会平. 不同光质LED光源对草莓光合特性、产量及品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(6): 1743-1750.
	Liu Q, Lian H F, Liu S Q, Sun Y L, Yu X H, Guo H P. Effects of different LED light qualities on photosynthetic characteristics, fruit production and quality of strawberry[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(6): 1743-1750. (in Chinese)
[8]	Nadalini S, Zucchi P, Andreotti C. Effects of blue and red LED lights on soilless cultivated strawberry growth performances and fruit quality[J]. European Journal for Horticultural Science, 2017, 82(1): 12-20. doi: 10.17660/eJHS.2017/82.1.2
[9]	张涵, 张玉琪, 黎景来, 李星, 郭健, 李涛. LED补光对日光温室基质栽培草莓生产及叶片生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(5): 975-990. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.05.012.
	Zhang H, Zhang Y Q, Li J L, Li X, Guo J, Li T. Effects of LED supplementary lighting on production and leaf physiological properties of substrate-cultivated strawberry in Chinese solar greenhouse[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(5): 975-990. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.05.012. (in Chinese)
[10]	李登延, 李曼曼. 温室照明动态调光控制系统设计[J]. 光源与照明, 2024(7): 17-19.
	Li D Y, Li M M. Design of dynamic dimming control system for greenhouse lighting[J]. Lamps & Lighting, 2024(7): 17-19. (in Chinese)
[11]	Myers J. Enhancement studies in photosynthesis[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1971, 22: 289-312. doi: 10.1146/arplant.1971.22.issue-1
[12]	Zou J, Zhang Y T, Zhang Y Q, Bian Z H, Fanourakis D, Yang Q C, Li T. Morphological and physiological properties of indoor cultivated lettuce in response to additional far-red light[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 257: 108725. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108725
[13]	Viczián A, Klose C, Ádám É, Nagy F. New insights of red light- induced development[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2017, 40(11): 2457-2468. doi: 10.1111/pce.v40.11
[14]	Prisca M, Maarten V, Jan V D, Bart N, Wouter S, Timo H, Barbara D C, de Poel Bram V. Blue and far-red light control flowering time of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) distinctively via CONSTANS (CO) and FLOWERING LOCUS T1 (FT1) in the background of sunlight mimicking radiation[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2022, 198: 104866. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104866
[15]	Chen Y C, Li T, Yang Q C, Zhang Y T, Zou J, Bian Z H, Wen X Z. UVA radiation is beneficial for yield and quality of indoor cultivated lettuce[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 1563. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01563 pmid: 31867029
[16]	Christie J M, Murphy A S. Shoot phototropism in higher plants: New light through old concepts[J]. American Journal of Botany, 2013, 100(1): 35-46. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200340 pmid: 23048016
[17]	Hidaka K, Okamoto A, Araki T, Miyoshi Y, Dan K, Imamura H, Kitano M, Sameshima K, Okimura M. Effect of photoperiod of supplemental lighting with light-emitting diodes on growth and yield of strawberry[J]. Environmental Control in Biology, 2014, 52(2): 63-71. doi: 10.2525/ecb.52.63
[18]	岳高峰, 王丽萍, 韩志强. 不同补光时长对草莓开花及产量品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(18): 144-148.
	Yue G F, Wang L P, Han Z Q. Influences of different light supplementary time on flowering, yield and quality of strawberry[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(18): 144-148. (in Chinese)
[19]	林坤明, 刘文科, 刘家源, 陈杰. LED红蓝光光强及光周期对草莓匍匐茎生长和开花结果的影响[J]. 中国照明电器, 2023(7): 1-7.
	Lin K M, Liu W K, Liu J Y, Chen J. Effects of LED red and blue light intensities and photoperiods on the growth of strawberry runners and flowering outcomes[J]. China Light & Lighting, 2023(7): 1-7. (in Chinese)
[20]	罗刚军. 基于中国原产野生草莓果实品质评价的种质创新研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2019.
	Luo G J. Study on germplasm innovation and fruit quality evaluation of the genus Fragaria species native to China[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[21]	孙萍, 沈建生, 林贤锐. 延长光照时间对立体种植模式下草莓植株生长的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2016, 57(1): 82-83, 89.
	Sun P, Shen J S, Lin X R. Effect of prolonging illumination time on strawberry plant growth under three-dimensional planting mode[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 57(1): 82-83, 89. (in Chinese)
[22]	卢贝. 不同光质对草莓生长发育影响及FaHY5在品质形成中的作用[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2021.
	Lu B. Effects of different light quality on growth and development of strawberry and role of FAHY5 in quality formation[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[23]	Ge Z M, Zhou X, Kellomäki S, Wang K Y, Peltola H, Martikainen P J. Responses of leaf photosynthesis, pigments and chlorophyll fluorescence within canopy position in a boreal grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) to elevated temperature and CO₂ under varying water regimes[J]. Photosynthetica, 2011, 49(2): 172-184. doi: 10.1007/s11099-011-0029-8
[24]	Naznin M T, Lefsrud M, Gravel V, Hao X. Using different ratios of red and blue LEDs to improve the growth of strawberry plants[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2016(1134): 125-130.
[25]	许大全, 高伟, 阮军. 光质对植物生长发育的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2015, 51(8): 1217-1234.
	Xu D Q, Gao W, Ruan J. Effects of light quality on plant growth and development[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 2015, 51(8): 1217-1234. (in Chinese)
[26]	Koskela E A, Mouhu K, Albani M C, Kurokura T, Rantanen M, Sargent D J, Battey N H, Coupland G, Elomaa P, Hytönen T. Mutation in TERMINAL FLOWER1 reverses the photoperiodic requirement for flowering in the wild strawberry Fragaria vesca[J]. Plant Physiology, 2012, 159(3): 1043-1054. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.196659 pmid: 22566495
[27]	Demotes-Mainard S, Péron T, Corot A, Bertheloot J, Le Gourrierec J, Pelleschi-Travier S, Crespel L, Morel P, Huché-Thélier L, Boumaza R, Vian A, Guérin V, Leduc N, Sakr S. Plant responses to red and far-red lights, applications in horticulture[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2016, 121: 4-21. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.05.010
[28]	Zahedi S M, Sarikhani H. The effect of end of day far-red light on regulating flowering of short-day strawberry (Fragaria × Ananassa Duch. сv. Paros) in a long-day situation[J]. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2017, 64(1): 83-90. doi: 10.1134/S1021443717010198
[29]	Islam M A, Tarkowská D, Clarke J L, Blystad D R, Gislerød H R, Torre S, Olsen J E. Impact of end-of-day red and far-red light on plant morphology and hormone physiology of Poinsettia[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2014, 174: 77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.05.013
[30]	Yang Z C, Kubota C, Chia P L, Kacira M. Effect of end-of-day far-red light from a movable LED fixture on squash rootstock hypocotyl elongation[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2012, 136: 81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.12.023
[31]	Van de Velde E, Van Wilder L, Schindfessel C, Vermeir P, Geelen D, Steppe K, Van Labeke M C, Dhooghe E. Far-red increases tipburn development at different PPFDs and planting densities in an indoor vertical farm[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2025, 345: 114142. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114142
[32]	Villamil-Galindo E, Antunes-Ricardo M, Piagentini A M, Jacobo- Velázquez D A. Adding value to strawberry agro-industrial by- products through ultraviolet A-induced biofortification of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory phenolic compounds[J]. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2022, 9: 1080147. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1080147
[33]	Zhang Y T, Kaiser E, Zhang Y Q, Zou J, Bian Z H, Yang Q C, Li T. UVA radiation promotes tomato growth through morphological adaptation leading to increased light interception[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2020, 176: 104073. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104073
[34]	Sarlikioti V, de Visser P H, Buck-Sorlin G H, How plant architecture affects light absorption and photosynthesis in tomato: Towards an ideotype for plant architecture using a functional-structural plant model[J]. Annals of Botany, 2011, 108(6): 1065-1073. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr221 pmid: 21865217
[35]	王佳淇, 何莹钰, 韦晓桐, 李永强, 杨莉, 陈文荣, 廖芳蕾, 郭卫东. LED补光组合对大棚越橘生长发育的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(6): 1183-1193. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2019-0707
	Wang J Q, He Y Y, Wei X T, Li Y Q, Yang L, Chen W R, Liao F L, Guo W D. Effects of LED supplemental light on the growth and development of blueberry in greenhouse[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(6): 1183-1193. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2019-0707
[36]	李海涛, 董铭, 廖迎春, 卢存福, 梁涛. 模拟UVB增强胁迫对大田水稻生长及内源激素含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(3): 392-397.
	Li H T, Dong M, Liao Y C, Lu C F, Liang T. The effects of modulated UVB supplementation on growth, leaf chlorophyll contents and endogenesis hormone contents of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in field [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(3): 392-397. (in Chinese)
[37]	高美芳. UVA补光时长对芥蓝生长发育及硫苷生物合成的影响[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2021.
	Gao M F. Effects of time of supplemental UVA radiation on growth, development and glucosinolate biosynthesis of Chinese kale[D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2021. (in Chinese)
[38]	王佳淇. 不同光质LED补光对大棚蓝莓生长发育的影响研究[D]. 金华: 浙江师范大学, 2020.
	Wang J Q. Study on the mechanism of the growth and development of greenhouse blueberry under different LED supplemental light[D]. Jinhua: Zhejiang Normal University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[39]	郑雪宜. 抗坏血酸在植物耐铝和UV-B辐射中的作用[D]. 广州: 华南农业大学, 2007.
	Zheng X Y. The role of ascorbic acid in plant tolerance to aluminum and UV-B radiation[D]. Guangzhou: South China Agricultural University, 2007. (in Chinese)
[40]	Shen Y Z, Guo S S. Effects of photoperiod on wheat growth, development and yield in CELSS[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 105(1): 24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.08.024
[41]	Wang C Z, Ma B L, Han J F, Wang Y H, Gao Y G, Hu X F, Zhang C M. Photoperiod effect on phytochrome and abscisic acid in alfalfa varieties differing in fall dormancy[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2008, 31(7): 1257-1269. doi: 10.1080/01904160802135027
[42]	袁娟, 武天龙, 陈典. 光周期对扁豆真叶内源激素及游离氨基酸含量的影响[J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2004, 22(3): 215-219, 226.
	Yuan J, Wu T L, Chen D. Effects of photoperiodic treatment on the endogenous hormones and dissociative amino acid of hyacinth bean leaves[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Agricultural Science), 2004, 22(3): 215-219, 226. (in Chinese)
[43]	陈杰, 李锁平, 张大乐. 植物避荫反应的分子生理学研究进展[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(10): 1355-1361.
	Chen J, Li S P, Zhang D L. Research progress of molecular physiology on shade avoidance responses in plants[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(10): 1355-1361. (in Chinese)
[44]	宋佳丽, 刘厚诚, 宋世威, 张轶婷, 郝彦伟, 苏蔚, 孙光闻, 陈日远. 光质调控植物开花时间和花性分化研究进展[J]. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(11): 1938-1946.
	Song J L, Liu H C, Song S W, Zhang Y T, Hao Y W, Su W, Sun G W, Chen R Y. Advances in regulation of light quality on flowering time and sex differentiation in plant[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2017, 53(11): 1938-1946. (in Chinese)

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

试验 Experiment	处理 Treatment	光子通量密度 Photon flux density (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	^1）补光灯运行时段 Operation period of supplementary lighting
光质 Light quality	白光White light	270-290 (Red/Blue=1/1)	8:00-18:00
	红蓝9/1 Red/blue 9/1	270-290
	红蓝9/1+远红光Red/blue 9/1+FR	270-290(FR=25-30)
	白光+UVA White light+UVA	270-290(UVA=15-20)
光周期 Photoperiod	10 h（白光）10 h (white light)	270-290	8:00-18:00 8:00-24:00
光周期 Photoperiod	16 h（白光）16 h (white light)	270-290	8:00-18:00 8:00-24:00

试验 Experiment	处理 Treatment	地上部干重 Above-ground dry weight (g)	叶片数 Leaf number	总叶面积 Total leaf area (cm²)	比叶面积 Specific leaf area (cm²·g^-1)	叶柄长度 Petiole length (cm)
光质 Light quality	对照CK	8.4±0.3d	23.3±0.5c	662±47c	137.4±5.4a	14.4±0.5c
	白光White light	17.7±1.1ab	27.3±1.0b	1284±77a	136.9±2.2a	18.2±1.0b
	红蓝9/1 Red/blue 9/1	13.5±1.0c	28.5±0.5a	1050±106b	137.1±2.9a	17.1±0.5b
	红蓝9/1+远红光Red/blue 9/1+FR	16.6±0.6b	29.3±0.6a	1066±48b	131.9±3.0a	15.0±0.6c
	白光+UVA White light+UVA	20.5±1.3a	24.5±0.6c	1404±113a	129.5±5.9a	22.3±0.6a
光周期 Photoperiod	对照CK	8.4±0.3c	23.3±0.5b	662±47c	137.4±5.4a	14.4±0.5c
	10 h（白光）10 h (white light)	17.7±1.1b	27.3±1.0a	1284±77b	136.9±2.2a	18.2±1.0b
	16 h（白光）16 h (white light)	22.1±1.4a	21.7±0.6c	1769±148a	139.0±7.2a	28.0±0.6a

试验Experiment	处理 Treatment	第一花序花芽数量 Flower buds of 1st inflorescence	第二花序花芽数量 Flower buds of 2nd inflorescence	第三花序花芽数量 Flower buds of 3rd inflorescence	总花芽数 Total flower buds	开花时数 Flowering hours (h)	坐果率 Fruit set rate (%)
光质 Light quality	对照CK	7.4±0.5c	7.1±0.3d	5.0±0.3c	19.5±0.8c	139.0±7.0a	26±2c
	白光White light	9.5±0.9b	9.8±0.8ab	6.3±0.6ab	25.6±1.1b	111.5±4.3b	33±2b
	红蓝9/1 Red/blue9/1	12.3±0.7a	9.5±0.5b	5.6±0.4b	27.4±1.5ab	119.2±4.9b	36±1ab
	红蓝9/1+远红光Red/blue9/1+FR	11.3±0.5a	11.1±1.0a	7.9±0.7a	30.3±1.4a	111.8±4.6b	38±1a
	白光+UVA White light+UVA	9.0±0.4b	8.4±0.5c	5.5±0.5b	22.9±1.0c	129.8±6.2a	26±1c
光周期 Photoperiod	对照CK	7.4±0.5c	7.1±0.3c	5.0±0.3c	19.5±0.8c	139.0±7.0a	26±2b
	10 h（白光） 10 h (white light)	9.5±0.9b	9.8±0.8b	6.3±0.6b	25.6±1.1b	111.5±4.3b	33±2a
	16 h（白光） 16 h (white light)	13.1±0.6a	13.9±1.3a	12.4±0.9a	41.1±1.8a	131.5±5.2a	22±1c

试验Experiment	处理Treatment	单株果数Fruit number per plant	单果重Single fruit weight (g)
光质 Light quality	对照CK	6.1±0.3c	27.5±0.4a
	白光White light	7.8±0.2b	26.3±0.6b
	红蓝9/1 Red/blue9/1	9.3±0.4a	24.3±0.4c
	红蓝9/1+远红光Red/blue9/1+FR	9.9±0.5a	26.1±0.3b
	白光+UVA White light+UVA	6.9±0.3c	26.0±0.5b
光周期 Photoperiod	对照CK	6.1±0.3c	27.5±0.4b
	10 h（白光）10 h (white light)	7.8±0.2b	26.3±0.6c
	16 h（白光）16 h (white light)	10.3±0.6a	28.6±0.5a

试验 Experiment	处理 Treatment	果实含水率 Fruit water content (%)	果实可溶性糖含量 Fruit soluble sugar content (mg·g^-1)	果实滴定酸含量 Fruit titratable acid content (mg·g^-1)	果实糖酸比 Fruit sugar acid ratio	果实可溶性蛋白含量 Fruit soluble protein content (mg·g^-1)
光质 Light quality	对照CK	90.8±0.7a	56.9±1.1b	7.9±0.1d	7.1±0.2b	0.5±0.0b
	白光White light	89.6±0.3b	55.6±2.7b	9.8±0.2b	6.0±0.2c	0.6±0.0a
	红蓝9/1 Red/blue9/1	91.1±1.0a	67.6±3.0a	9.3±0.1c	7.6±0.3a	0.6±0.0a
	红蓝9/1+远红光Red/blue9/1+FR	90.3±0.3ab	66.5±1.9a	10.9±0.1a	6.3±0.2c	0.6±0.0a
	白光+UVA White light+UVA	89.4±1.6ab	56.6±5.1b	9.5±0.1bc	5.7±0.7c	0.6±0.0a
光周期 Photoperiod	对照CK	90.8±0.7a	56.9±1.1a	7.9±0.1b	7.1±0.2a	0.5±0.0b
	10 h（白光）10 h (white light)	89.6±0.3b	55.6±2.7a	9.8±0.2a	6.0±0.2b	0.6±0.0a
	16 h（白光）16 h (white light)	90.2±0.2ab	58.1±1.8a	9.7±0.1a	6.2±0.1b	0.6±0.0a

Effects of Light Quality and Photoperiod on Growth, Yield, and Quality of Substrate-Cultivated Strawberry in a Chinese Solar Greenhouse

RichHTML

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 44

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHANG DongMei, ZHOU XinXin, XIAO GuiLin, ZENG XiangGuo, WANG ChunYan, WANG ZeXian, HAN YongChao. Phenotypic Characteristics of Strawberry Floral Organs in Response to Botrytis cinerea Infection and Methods for Gray Mold Resistance Evaluation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1456-1466.
[2]	LUO ZhengYing, HU SiZhen, LIN XiuQin, HU Xin, ZHANG Min, XU ChaoHua, LIU XinLong, ZENG QianChun. Identification and Functional Characterization of the PEBP Gene Family in Regulating Flowering Time in Saccharum spontaneum and Saccharum officinarum [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 734-749.
[3]	ZHANG Han, ZHANG YuQi, LI JingLai, XU Hong, LI WeiHuan, LI Tao. Effects of LED Supplementary Lighting on Production and Leaf Physiological Properties of Substrate-Cultivated Strawberry in Chinese Solar Greenhouse [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(5): 975-990.
[4]	WANG QingFeng, CHU ChangBin, ZHAO Zheng, WU ShuHang, ZHOU DePing. Effects of Strawberry Continuous Cropping on Soil Microbial Community Composition and Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Metabolism Gene Abundance [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(17): 3488-3502.
[5]	XiaoFeng LU,GuoDong DU,Jing SHAO,JingRu ZHANG,HaiLong SUN. Physiological Response of Mitochondrial Function of Strawberry Roots to Exogenous Phenolic Acid [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(5): 1029-1042.
[6]	WANG JunJie,TIAN Xiang,QIN HuiBin,WANG HaiGang,CAO XiaoNing,CHEN Ling,LIU SiChen,QIAO ZhiJun. Regulation Effects of Photoperiod on Growth and Leaf Endogenous Hormones in Broomcorn Millet [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(2): 286-295.
[7]	Ming DONG,YanMiao JIANG,HaiQuan LI,LingLing GENG,JianYe LIU,ZhiHong QIAO,GuoQing LIU. Effects of Photoperiod Changes on Morphological Characters and Young Panicle Development in Proso Millet (Panicum Miliaceum L.) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(6): 1118-1125.
[8]	WANG JunJie,WANG HaiGang,CAO XiaoNing,CHEN Ling,LIU SiChen,TIAN Xiang,QIN HuiBin,QIAO ZhiJun. Comprehensive Evaluation of Photoperiod Sensitivity Based on Different Traits of Broomcorn Millet [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(3): 474-485.
[9]	YongChao HAN,XiangGuo ZENG,FaYun XIANG,Cong GUO,QingHua ZHANG,FengYing CHEN,Wei GUAN. In vitro Evaluation of Strawberry Germplasm Resources for Resistance to Anthracnose [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(20): 3585-3594.
[10]	YAN YiChao, WAN ChunYan, GU XianBin, GUO ChengBao, CHEN YueHong, GAO ZhiHong. Effect of RdreB1BI Gene Overexpression on Fruit Quality and Related Gene Expression in Strawberry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(7): 1353-1367.
[11]	LI Shuai, JIANG XiZi, LIANG WeiFang, CHEN SiHan, ZHANG XiangXiang, ZUO DengPan, HU YaHui, JIANG Tong. Screening of the Host Factors of Woodland Strawberry Interacting with P6 of Strawberry vein banding virus by Yeast Two-Hybrid System [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(18): 3519-3528.
[12]	Lü Xiao-su, LI Yu-xuan, MIAO Ying, CHEN Liang-ke, SHEN Yuan-yue, QIN Ling, XING Yu. Analysis of Protein Phosphorylation Level at Different Developmental Stages of Strawberry Fruit [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(10): 1946-1959.
[13]	CHEN Liu, SHANG Qiao-xia, CHEN Xiao-yu, XING Dong-mei, RAN Ce, WEI Yan-min, ZHAO Xiao-yan, LIU Zheng-ping. Detection of Strawberry mild yellow edge virus by RT-LAMP [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(3): 613-520.
[14]	HAN Yong-chao, ZENG Xiang-guo, XIANG Fa-yun, YANG Xiao-fang, YUAN Hua-zhao, CHEN Feng-ying, GU Yu-cheng. Effect of Petals Fall off on Botrytis Fruit Rot in Strawberry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(22): 4460-4468.
[15]	HAN Yong-Chao, XIANG Fa-Yun, ZENG Xiang-Guo, ZHANG Peng, GU Yu-Cheng. Identification of Pathogen Causing Crown and Root Rot on Strawberry [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(1): 53-60.