单粒播种与施磷对间作花生种间竞争和生长的调控效应

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.23.008

Abstract

Abstract:

【Background】Maize (Zea mays) intercropping with peanut (Arachis hypogaea) (maize||peanut) has outstanding interspecific effects between aboveground and underground, and the intercropping advantage in yield is prominent, which plays an important role in alleviating the conflict between oil and grain in our country. However, peanut is at the disadvantage of interspecific competition, which becomes the bottleneck restricting the further improvement of intercropping advantage.【Objective】The objective of this study is to explore the regulation measures and mechanism of enhancing peanut interspecific competition in maize||peanut system, and to provide theoretical basis and technical support for maize||peanut high-yield cultivation.【Method】Maize ‘Zhengdan 958’ and peanut ‘Huayu 16’ were used as test materials in the experimental farm of Henan University of Science and Technology from 2021 to 2022. A completely randomized block experiment with three factors: planting pattern, peanut sowing method and phosphorus application rate was set up. In other words, planting patterns were peanut monoculture and maize||peanut, peanut seeding methods were single-seed sowing and double-seed sowing, and phosphorus application rates were 0 (P₀) and 180 kg P₂O₅·hm^-2(P₁₈₀). Peanut double-seed sowing of maize||peanut was used as control, effects of peanut single-seed sowing on interspecific competitiveness of intercropping peanut over maize, net photosynthetic rate, maximum growth rate, dry matter accumulation and distribution, and yield advantage of intercropping were studied.【Result】Compared to the strong and weak plants with double-seed sowing peanut, single-seed sowing significantly increased the aggressivity and crowding coefficient of intercropping peanut over maize, the aggressivity increased by 29.72%-80.85% and 38.91%-87.07%, respectively, and the crowding coefficient increased by 76.59%-172.02% and 244.43%-308.70%, respectively. The net photosynthetic rate of intercropping peanut with single-seed sowing was significantly higher than that with double-seed sowing, and the maximum growth rate was significantly higher than that of strong and weak plants with double-seed sowing, respectively. The dry matter in the later growth period was significantly increased, dry matter distribution ratio to pod was increased, the contribution rate of stem and leaf dry matter to pod was improved, compared to the strong and weak plants with double-seed sowing peanut. The yield and advantage of intercropping with single seeding were higher than those with double seeding, and the yield was 18.84%-33.32% higher, the difference was significant. Compared with no phosphorus fertilizer, phosphorus application significantly increased the net photosynthetic rate and maximum growth rate of intercropping peanut, and promoted the dry matter accumulation and increased yield of intercropping peanut.【Conclusion】Peanut single-seed sowing can improve intercropping peanut yield and intercropping advantage, the key lies in the fact that single-seed sowing can enhance interspecific competitiveness of intercropping peanut compare with double-seed sowing, significantly increase the net photosynthetic rate, and promote the accumulation of dry matter and distribution to the pod. Phosphorus application promotes the growth and development of intercropping peanut under single-seed sowing.

Key words: maize, peanut, interspecific competition, strong plant and weak plant, maximum growth rate, yield, single-seed sowing, phosphorus fertilizer

JIANG WenYang, CHEN JunNan, ZAN ZhiMan, WANG JiangTao, ZHENG Bin, LIU Ling, LIU Juan, JIAO NianYuan. Regulation of Single-Seed Sowing and Phosphorus Application on Interspecific Competition and Growth of Intercropping Peanut[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(23): 4660-4670.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 1

Fig. 4

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

References 32

[1]	ZHAO X H, DONG Q Q, HAN Y, ZHANG K Z, SHI X L, YANG X, YUAN Y, ZHOU D Y, WANG K, WANG X G, JIANG C J, LIU X B, ZHANG H, ZHANG Z M, YU H Q. Maize/peanut intercropping improves nutrient uptake of side-row maize and system microbial community diversity. BMC Microbiology, 2022, 22: 14. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02425-6 pmid: 34996375
[2]	焦念元, 宁堂原, 赵春, 王芸, 史忠强, 侯连涛, 付国占, 江晓东, 李增嘉. 玉米花生间作复合体系光合特性的研究. 作物学报, 2006, 32(6): 917-923.
	JIAO N Y, NING T Y, ZHAO C, WANG Y, SHI Z Q, HOU L T, FU G Z, JIANG X D, LI Z J. Characters of photosynthesis in intercropping system of maize and peanut. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006, 32(6): 917-923. (in Chinese)
[3]	焦念元, 杨萌珂, 宁堂原, 尹飞, 徐国伟, 付国占, 李友军. 玉米花生间作和磷肥对间作花生光合特性及产量的影响. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(11): 1010-1017. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00104
	JIAO N Y, YANG M K, NING T Y, YIN F, XU G W, FU G Z, LI Y J. Effects of maize-peanut intercropping and phosphate fertilizer on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of intercropped peanut plants. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(11): 1010-1017. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00104
[4]	WANG Q, SUN Z X, BAI W, ZHANG D S, ZHANG Y, WANG R N, VAN DER WERF W, EVERS J B, STOMPH T J, GUO J P, ZHANG L Z. Light interception and use efficiency differ with maize plant density in maize-peanut intercropping. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2021, 8(3): 432-446.
[5]	ZHANG D S, DU G J, SUN Z X, BAI W, WANG Q, FENG L S, ZHENG J M, ZHANG Z, LIU Y, YANG S, YANG N, FENG C, CAI Q, EVERS J B, VAN DER WERF W, ZHANG L Z. Agroforestry enables high efficiency of light capture, photosynthesis and dry matter production in a semi-arid climate. European Journal of Agronomy, 2018, 94: 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.01.001
[6]	唐秀梅, 黄志鹏, 吴海宁, 刘菁, 蒋菁, 唐荣华. 玉米/花生间作条件下土壤环境因子的相关性和主成分分析. 生态环境学报, 2020, 29(2): 223-230. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2020.02.002
	TANG X M, HUANG Z P, WU H N, LIU J, JIANG J, TANG R H. Correlation and principal component analysis of the soil environmental factors in maize/peanut intercropping conditions. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2020, 29(2): 223-230. (in Chinese)
[7]	REN J H, ZHANG L Z, DUAN Y, ZHANG J, EVERS J B, ZHANG Y, SU Z C, VAN DER WERF W. Intercropping potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) with hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) increases water use efficiency in dry conditions. Field Crops Research, 2019, 240: 168-176. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.002
[8]	HAGE-AHMED K, KRAMMER J, STEINKELLNER S. The intercropping partner affects arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici interactions in tomato. Mycorrhiza, 2013, 23(7): 543-550. doi: 10.1007/s00572-013-0495-x
[9]	ZHANG Y, DUAN Y, NIE J Y, YANG J, REN J H, VAN DER WERF W, EVERS J B, ZHANG J, SU Z C, ZHANG L Z. A lack of complementarity for water acquisition limits yield advantage of oats/vetch intercropping in a semi-arid condition. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 225: 105778. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105778
[10]	王飞, 刘领, 武岩岩, 李雪, 孙增光, 尹飞, 焦念元, 付国占. 玉米花生间作改善花生铁营养提高其光合特性的机理. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(5): 901-913.
	WANG F, LIU L, WU Y Y, LI X, SUN Z G, YIN F, JIAO N Y, FU G Z. Mechanism of maize intercropping peanut improving iron nutrition to increase photosynthetic performance of peanut. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(5): 901-913. (in Chinese)
[11]	JIAO N Y, WANG F, MA C, ZHANG F S, JENSEN E S. Interspecific interactions of iron and nitrogen use in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)-maize (Zea mays L.) intercropping on a calcareous soil. European Journal of Agronomy, 2021, 128: 126303. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2021.126303
[12]	JIAO N Y, WANG J T, MA C, ZHANG C C, GUO D Y, ZHANG F S, JENSEN E S. The importance of aboveground and belowground interspecific interactions in determining crop growth and advantages of peanut/maize intercropping. The Crop Journal, 2021, 9(6): 1460-1469. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2020.12.004
[13]	张佳蕾, 郭峰, 苗昊翠, 李利民, 杨莎, 耿耘, 孟静静, 李新国, 万书波. 单粒精播对高产花生株间竞争缓解效应研究. 花生学报, 2018, 47(2): 52-58.
	ZHANG J L, GUO F, MIAO H C, LI L M, YANG S, GENG Y, MENG J J, LI X G, WAN S B. Study on relieving inter-plant competition by single seed sowing of high yield peanut. Journal of Peanut Science, 2018, 47(2): 52-58. (in Chinese)
[14]	LIANG X Y, GUO F, FENG Y, ZHANG J L, YANG S, MENG J J, LI X G, WAN S B. Single-seed sowing increased pod yield at a reduced seeding rate by improving root physiological state of Arachis hypogaea. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(4): 1019-1032. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62712-7
[15]	梁晓艳, 郭峰, 张佳蕾, 孟静静, 李林, 万书波, 李新国. 单粒精播对花生冠层微环境、光合特性及产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(12): 3700-3706.
	LIANG X Y, GUO F, ZHANG J L, MENG J J, LI L, WAN S B, LI X G. Effects of single-seed sowing on canopy microenvironment, photosynthetic characteristics and pod yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaca). Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(12): 3700-3706. (in Chinese)
[16]	CHEN T, ZHANG J, WANG X, ZENG R, CHEN Y, ZHANG H, WAN S, ZHANG L. Monoseeding increases peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield by regulating shade-avoidance responses and population density. Plants, 2021, 10(11): 2405. doi: 10.3390/plants10112405
[17]	YANG S, ZHANG J, GENG Y, TANG Z, WANG J, GUO F, MENG J, WANG Q, WAN S, LI X. Transcriptome analysis reveals the mechanism of improving erect-plant-type peanut yield by single- seeding precision sowing. PeerJ, 2021, 9: e10616. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10616
[18]	万书波, 张佳蕾, 张智猛. 花生种植技术的重大变革——单粒精播. 中国油料作物学报, 2020, 42(6): 927-933.
	WAN S B, ZHANG J L, ZHANG Z M. Great change of peanut planting technology: Single seed sowing. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2020, 42(6): 927-933. (in Chinese) doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2020208
[19]	ADLER P B, SMULL D, BEARD K H, CHOI R T, FURNISS T, KULMATISKI A, MEINERS J M, TREDENNICK A T, VEBLEN K E. Competition and coexistence in plant communities: Intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. Ecology Letters, 2018, 21(9): 1319-1329. doi: 10.1111/ele.13098 pmid: 29938882
[20]	崔党群. Logistic曲线方程的解析与拟合优度测验. 数理统计与管理, 2005, 24(1): 112-115.
	CUI D Q. Analysis and making good fitting degree test for Logistic curve regression equation. Mathematical Statistics and Management, 2005, 24(1): 112-115. (in Chinese)
[21]	GHOSH P K. Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Research, 2004, 88(2/3): 227-237. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.015
[22]	赵建华, 孙建好, 李伟绮. 玉米播期对大豆/玉米间作产量及种间竞争力的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(11): 1634-1642.
	ZHAO J H, SUN J H, LI W Q. Effect of maize sowing date on yield and interspecific competition in soybean/maize intercropping system. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(11): 1634-1642. (in Chinese)
[23]	WU K X, FULLEN M A, AN T X, FAN Z W, ZHOU F, XUE G F, WU B Z. Above- and below-ground interspecific interaction in intercropped maize and potato: A field study using the ‘target’ technique. Field Crops Research, 2012, 139: 63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.10.002
[24]	KOKKORIS G D, TROUMBIS A Y, LAWTON J H. Patterns of species interaction strength in assembled theoretical competition communities. Ecology Letters, 1999, 2: 70-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.22058.x
[25]	REN Y, ZHANG L, YAN M, ZHANG Y, CHEN Y, PALTA J A, ZHANG S. Effect of sowing proportion on above- and below-ground competition in maize-soybean intercrops. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 15760. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95242-w pmid: 34344978
[26]	CALLAWAY R M, WALKER L R. Competition and facilitation: A synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology, 1997, 78(7): 1958-1965. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1958:CAFASA]2.0.CO;2
[27]	赵建华, 孙建好, 陈亮之. 三种豆科作物与玉米间作对玉米生产力和种间竞争的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29(1): 86-94. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2019119
	ZHAO J H, SUN J H, CHEN L Z. Productivity and interspecific competition of maize intercropped with faba bean, soybean or pea. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(1): 86-94. (in Chinese)
[28]	焦念元, 汪江涛, 尹飞, 李亚辉, 付国占, 李友军. 化学调控与施磷肥对玉米花生间作光合物质积累和产量的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(4): 99-104.
	JIAO N Y, WANG J T, YIN F, LI Y H, FU G Z, LI Y J. Effects of chemical regulation and phosphorus fertilization on photosynthetic material accumulation and yield of intercropped maize and peanut. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(4): 99-104. (in Chinese)
[29]	ROBAKOWSKI P, BIELINIS E, SENDALL K. Light energy partitioning, photosynthetic efficiency and biomass allocation in invasive Prunus serotina and native Quercus petraea in relation to light environment, competition and allelopathy. Journal of Plant Research, 2018, 131(3): 505-523. doi: 10.1007/s10265-018-1009-x
[30]	GAO L, XU H, BI H, XI W, BAO B, WANG X, BI C, CHANG Y. Intercropping competition between apple trees and crops in agroforestry systems on the Loess Plateau of China. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(7): e70739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070739
[31]	程彬, 刘卫国, 王莉, 许梅, 覃思思, 卢俊吉, 高阳, 李淑贤, RAZA A, 张熠, AHMAD I, 敬树忠, 刘然金, 杨文钰. 种植密度对玉米-大豆带状间作下大豆光合、产量及茎秆抗倒的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(19): 4084-4096. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.19.005.
	CHENG B, LIU W G, WANG L, XU M, QIN S S, LU J J, GAO Y, LI S X, RAZA A, ZHANG Y, AHMAD I, JING S Z, LIU R J, YANG W Y. Effects of planting density on photosynthetic characteristics, yield and stem lodging resistance of soybean in maize-soybean strip intercropping system. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(19): 4084-4096. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.19.005. (in Chinese)
[32]	ZHANG J L, GENG Y, GUO F, LI X G, WAN S B. Research progress on the mechanism of improving peanut yield by single-seed precision sowing. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(8): 1919-1927. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62763-2

Related Articles 15

[1]	PENG TingShen, LU JiuYan, WU MeiLin, YAN YuXin, LIU HongZhou, NAN WenBin, QIN XiaoJian, LI Ming, GONG JunYi, LIANG YongShu. QTL Analysis of Yield-Related Traits in Both Huangnuo2^# and Changbai7^# of Perennial Chinese Rice [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2]	WANG YaFei, YAN Peng, XUE JinTao, DONG XueRui, MENG FanQi, GUO LiNa, LUO Yi, ZHANG Juan, DONG ZhiQiang, LU Lin. Effects of Ethephon-Glycine Betaine-Salicylic Acid Mixture on Root System Architecture, Physiological Function and Yield of Maize Under Heat Stress [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1439-1455.
[3]	WANG YuPing, FU Zhi, SUN JiaYing, MU XiaoMeng, LIU HuiLin, GUO JinYun, SONG WenJing, HOU LeiPing, ZHAO HaiLiang. Evaluation of the Mitigating Effect and Application Efficacy of Melatonin Applied at the Seedling Stage on Short-Term Chilling Stress in Tomato Plants [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535.
[4]	WANG JiaNuo, CHEN GuiPing, LI Pan, WANG LiPing, NAN YunYou, HE Wei, FAN ZhiLong, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang, YIN Wen, ZHAO LiaoHao. Photo-Physiological Mechanism at Grain Filling Stage of No-Tillage with Plastic Re-Mulching to Increase Maize Yield in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[5]	ZHOU XinJie, REN Hao, CHEN YingLong, ZHANG JiWang, ZHAO Bin, REN BaiZhao, LIU Peng, WANG HongZhang. Effects of Calcium Peroxide on Root Morphology and Yield Formation of Summer Maize in Waterlogging Farmland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[6]	HE JiHang, ZHANG Qing, LÜ XiangYue, XUE JiQuan, XU ShuTu, LIU JianChao. Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency of Different Stay-Green Maize Hybrids [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[7]	LI YongJuan, ZHANG YueTong, WANG YiBo, ZHAO ChangJiang, SONG Jie, CHEN XueLi, YAO Qin. Effects of Biochar Application on the Abundance and Community Composition of Nitrogen-Fixing Microbial nifH Gene in Soybean Rotation and Continuous Cropping Systems [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[8]	LI SiYuan, LI HongPing, CHANG HongQing, ZHANG SenYan, LI SiJia, CUI XinFei, QIAO Po, ZENG Bo, LIU GuiZhen, LIU TianXue, TANG JiHua, LI ChaoHai. Effects of Density Increase on Dynamic Change of Yield and Agronomic Traits of Maize Cultivars with Different Plant Heights [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 967-984.
[9]	DONG JinLong, ZHAO Ying, YU HaiBing, LÜ JianYe, QIN JiaQi, LIANG Chen, MING Bo, LI ShaoKun. Multi-Model Elucidating of Nutritional Quality Contributions to Maize Kernel Test Weight and Regional Heterogeneity [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 985-995.
[10]	HAO Kun, CHEN HongDe, ZHANG Wei, ZHONG Yun, DANG MeiRong, ZHU ShiJiang, HUANG ZhiKun, JIN Ying. Comprehensive Evaluation of Water-Nitrogen Management Under Surge-Root Irrigation Based on Citrus Yield, Quality, and Water- Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[11]	GUO FuCheng, TANG HaiJiang, HAO XinYi, MA GuoLin, YANG JiuJu, HUANG LinFeng, TIAN Lei, WANG Bin, LUO ChengKe. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on Water-Salt Transport, Rice Yield, and Water Use Efficiency in Saline Soil in Ningxia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[12]	YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[13]	YANG Rui, CHEN JingDong, HUANG Ying, XIE LingLi, ZHANG XueKun, ZHOU DengWen, LIU QingYun, XU JinSong, XU BenBo. Genetic Improvement and Configuration Analysis of High-Yield Rapeseed Lines in the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 250-264.
[14]	CHEN GuiPing, WEI JinGui, GUO Yao, LI Pan, WANG FeiEr, QIU HaiLong, FENG FuXue, YIN Wen. Synergistic Effects of Wide-Narrow Row and Density Enhancement on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Resource Utilization of Maize in Oasis Irrigation Areas [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 278-291.
[15]	CAI TingYang, ZHU YuPeng, LI RuiDong, WU ZongSheng, XU YiFan, SONG WenWen, XU CaiLong, WU CunXiang. Effects of Leaf-Cutting at Seedling Stage on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Pod Distribution and Yield Formation in Soybean in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 292-304.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

生育时期 Growth stage	P水平 P level	种植模式 Plant pattern	净光合速率P_n (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	气孔导度Gs (mmol·m^-2·s^-1)	胞间CO₂浓度C_i (mmol·mol^-1)	蒸腾速率T_r (mmol·m^-2·s^-1)
结荚期 Pod-setting stage	P₀	SDSP	21.72e	1.026d	317.53c	14.54e
		WDSP	20.09f	1.017d	353.49b	11.15g
		SSP	23.93d	1.079c	299.34d	16.12c
		SDIP	20.46f	0.977e	357.08b	10.87g
		WDIP	19.15g	0.925f	368.69a	8.35h
		SIP	21.61e	1.063c	312.66c	12.91f
	P₁₈₀	SDSP	27.21b	1.161b	300.15d	19.57b
		WDSP	25.40c	1.083c	320.96c	17.07c
		SSP	29.46a	1.294a	279.75f	21.46a
		SDIP	25.29c	0.993e	302.16d	15.68d
		WDIP	23.57d	0.932f	319.38c	13.09f
		SIP	26.88b	1.061c	290.37e	16.66c
饱果期 Pod-filling stage	P₀	SDSP	20.94c	0.436d	284.48c	5.17f
		WDSP	18.77d	0.390e	314.31a	3.32g
		SSP	22.13b	0.467c	275.11d	6.00e
		SDIP	19.14d	0.387e	301.20b	4.34f
		WDIP	17.40e	0.327f	313.45a	2.94g
		SIP	20.49c	0.420d	290.71bc	5.35ef
	P₁₈₀	SDSP	22.09b	0.654b	268.53d	9.72b
		WDSP	20.77c	0.473c	282.19c	8.46c
		SSP	23.44a	0.723a	258.72e	11.58a
		SDIP	20.31c	0.472c	272.86d	7.39d
		WDIP	18.59d	0.435d	288.43bc	6.12e
		SIP	22.01b	0.599b	269.01d	9.11b

P水平 P level	种植模式 Plant pattern	干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation (g/plant)			干物质分配比例 Dry matter distribution ratio (%)
P水平 P level	种植模式 Plant pattern	茎Stem	叶Leaf	荚果Pod	茎Stem	叶Leaf	荚果Pod
P₀	SDSP	17.11d	9.83d	21.78d	35.12b	20.18c	44.70b
	WDSP	12.17f	8.19e	11.79g	37.87a	25.47a	36.67d
	SSP	18.41c	10.31d	25.70c	33.84c	18.94e	47.22a
	SDIP	14.28e	9.21d	17.51f	34.83c	22.46b	41.28c
	WDIP	10.74g	7.22f	11.46g	36.50b	24.54a	38.95d
	SIP	17.43d	12.15c	22.86d	33.88c	21.68b	44.44b
P₁₈₀	SDSP	22.49b	15.13b	31.18b	32.69c	21.99b	45.32b
	WDSP	15.14e	9.96d	14.02g	38.70a	25.46a	35.85e
	SSP	24.68a	16.10a	37.14a	31.67d	20.66c	47.67a
	SDIP	17.36d	11.92c	19.85e	35.33b	24.26a	40.40d
	WDIP	12.95f	8.30e	12.53g	38.34a	24.57a	37.09d
	SIP	18.95c	12.83c	36.32c	32.61c	22.08b	45.31b

P水平 P level	种植模式 Plant pattern	转移量 Dry matter transfer (g/plant)		转移率 Dry matter transfer ratio (%)		贡献率 Contribution rate to seed (%)
P水平 P level	种植模式 Plant pattern	茎Stem	叶Leaf	茎Stem	叶Leaf	茎Stem	叶Leaf	茎+叶Stem+Leaf
P₀	SDSP	0.55e	2.97ab	2.94g	21.51b	2.64g	14.29c	16.93e
	WDSP	0.24f	0.22e	1.91h	2.62h	2.01g	1.87h	3.87h
	SSP	1.54c	3.77a	7.01e	22.76b	6.63f	16.27b	22.90c
	SDIP	1.62c	2.55b	9.02d	21.70b	9.22d	14.57c	23.79c
	WDIP	1.06d	1.25c	8.80d	15.30d	9.20d	10.91d	20.11d
	SIP	2.37b	4.11a	11.41c	25.27a	10.86c	18.80a	29.65a
P₁₈₀	SDSP	2.36b	1.48c	9.88d	10.14f	7.56e	4.75g	12.31f
	WDSP	0.99d	0.70d	5.61f	7.20g	6.58f	4.63g	11.21g
	SSP	4.13a	2.57b	14.34b	13.78e	11.13c	6.93f	18.05e
	SDIP	2.89b	1.70c	13.59b	15.16d	14.54b	8.57e	23.12c
	WDIP	1.15d	0.31e	7.13e	3.67h	9.16d	2.43h	11.60fg
	SIP	4.02a	2.69b	17.50a	17.33c	15.87a	10.62d	26.48b

年份 Year	P水平 P level	种植模式 Cropping system	单株果数 Number of pods per plant	百果重 100-pods weight (g)	株数 Number of plant (×10⁵/hm²)	产量 Yield (kg·hm^-2)	偏土地当量比 LER_P
2021	P₀	DSP	20.5d (23.2/17.8)	96.6d (119.1/74.0)	2.64a (1.42+1.22)	3886d (2500+1386)
		SSP	31.0b	123.1b	1.72c	4301c
		DIP	13.2f (14.8/11.5)	75.0f (76.1/73.9)	1.54b (0.82+0.72)	1267h (711+556)	0.327
		SIP	21.3d	82.2e	1.03d	1506g	0.350
	P₁₈₀	DSP	24.4c (26.7/22.0)	115.6c (119.7/111.6)	2.66a (1.43+1.23)	5172b (3153+2019)
		SSP	35.2a	134.9a	1.73c	5514a
		DIP	15.8e (18.3/13.3)	80.4g (80.2/80.7)	1.55b (0.83+0.73)	2070f (1210+860)	0.400
		SIP	25.5c	94.5d	1.03d	2460e	0.446
2022	P₀	DSP	19.3f (22.2/16.5)	123.1d (125.6/120.6)	2.68a (1.43+1.25)	5631d (3120+2511)
		SSP	38.7c	128.5c	1.76c	7131b
		DIP	14.7g (17.3/12.0)	143.6b (146.4/140.8)	1.57b (0.84+0.73)	2915h (1746+1169)	0.517
		SIP	28.3d	153.0a	1.04d	3828f	0.536
	P₁₈₀	DSP	24.4e (27.0/21.7)	120.2d (121.9/118.5)	2.78a (1.47+1.31)	6531c (3521+3010)
		SSP	47.8a	127.2c	1.82c	8391a
		DIP	18.4f (21.8/15.0)	128.7c (132.5/124.8)	1.67b (0.88+0.79)	3455g (2018+1437)	0.528
		SIP	45.3b	153.6a	1.09d	4600e	0.548
P水平P level						165.10**
种植模式Cropping system						1588.03**
P水平×种植模式P level×Cropping system						14.77**
年份×P水平×种植模式Year×P level×Cropping system						0.229NS

Regulation of Single-Seed Sowing and Phosphorus Application on Interspecific Competition and Growth of Intercropping Peanut

RichHTML

PDF