中国观赏芍药表型多样性解析与资源评价

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.18.012

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】The objective of this study was to estimate the resource diversity of Chinese ornamental herbaceous peonies and to analyze the characteristics of being cut peonies, so as to provide a theoretical basis for germplasm utilization and innovation.【Method】Phenotypic characteristics data of 346 herbaceous peonies from four cultivation areas were collected. Then, according to the whole sample and the samples from different cultivation areas, the frequency distribution, coefficient of variation and diversity index were calculated. Additionally, the varieties were analyzed by clustering.【Result】The cultivars of Chinese ornamental herbaceous peonies were rich in the diversity of many characteristics, with diversity indices of binary, ordered and disordered multistate characteristics of 0.29-1.90 as well as numerical characteristics of 1.90-2.08. In binary, ordered and disordered multistate characteristics, flower color and flower type showed the highest diversity index, i.e., 1.90 and 1.88, respectively, followed by flower bud color (1.46) and degree of stamen petalization (1.42). In numerical characteristics, plant height and stem length had the highest diversity index, i.e., 2.08 and 2.07, respectively, followed by bud diameter (2.04), flower diameter (2.04) and flower height (2.01), and only the diversity indices of stem diameter (1.99) and pedicel length (1.90) were less than 2. Furthermore, the plant height was distributed in the range of 38.50-100.50 cm, stem length was 43.19-120.00 cm, and both were normally distributed. However, bud diameter, flower height, flower diameter, stem diameter and pedicel length showed skewed distributions. Among them, the bud diameter was 1.22-3.99 cm, showing a negatively skewed distribution. The flower diameter was distributed in the range of 3.11-19.50 cm, and the variation coefficient was only 15.65%, ranking it last among the numerical characteristics. The flower height (1.73-14.30 cm) was negatively distributed, with a variation coefficient of 32.55%, ranking it first among the numerical characteristics. Stem diameter (0.18-0.59 cm) and pedicel length (5.57-40.00 cm) were positively skewed. The nine groups were divided by clustering, and the most of the clustering groups included varieties from two to four cultivation areas. Moreover, there were no significant differences in bud diameter, flower diameter, stem diameter or pedicel length among the clustering groups. The plant height, stem length, flower height and degree of stamen petalization were different. Among the samples, 71.39% of the varieties had round flower buds and were nonchapped, which were presently popular in the Chinese market. Many varieties were the double flower type, but the hydrangea type preferred by the market accounted for only 4.9%. Meanwhile, 79.8% of the varieties had no obvious flower fragrance, 71.7% of the varieties had side buds, and 62.7% of the varieties bloomed during the middle flowering period, lacking early- or late-flowering varieties. There were no significant differences in plant height or stem length among the various cultivation areas, while the stem diameters of cultivars from Lintao and Heze were significantly larger than those from Yangzhou and Luoyang. The bud diameter and flower diameter of cultivars from Heze were also significantly larger.【Conclusion】A relatively high diversity of Chinese cultivated ornamental herbaceous peonies was observed, and as a kind of multifunctional plant, the diversity was worth preserving. However, the cultivars were insufficient as cut peonies, lacking cultivars with straight stems, fragrance, single buds and diverse flowering periods. The varieties from Lintao and Heze had some advantages in stem, bud and flower diameters for cut flowers. Cut peony selection and breeding in China was inadequate. Innovative germplasms need to be developed. It is urgent to introduce germplasms with the characteristics of long stems, single flower on one stem, fragrant flowers and late flowering periods for breeding.

Key words: Paeonia lactilfora, germplasm resources, coefficient of variation, genetic diversity

YingLing WAN,MengTing ZHU,AiQing LIU,YiJia JIN,Yan LIU. Phenotypic Diversity Analysis of Chinese Ornamental Herbaceous Peonies and Its Germplasm Resource Evaluation[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(18): 3629-3639.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Fig. 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

References 19

[20]	李雁瓷, 付乃峰, 孙加芝, 肖艳, 曹建国, 田代科. 秋海棠(Begonia grandis)的种内表型多样性. 植物研究, 2021, 41(5): 775-788.
	LI Y C, FU N F, SUN J Z, XIAO Y, CAO J G, TIAN D K. Intraspecific phenotypic diversity in Begonia grandis. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41(5): 775-788. (in Chinese)
[21]	过聪, 关伟, 曾祥国, 张庆华, 向发云, 宋粤君, 韩永超. 现代月季品种表型性状分析与评价. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(24): 4632-4646.
	GUO C, GUAN W, ZENG X G, ZHANG Q H, XIANG F Y, SONG Y J, HAN Y C. Phenotype character analysis and evaluation of modern rose cultivars. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(24): 4632-4646. (in Chinese)
[22]	苏群, 杨亚涵, 田敏, 张进忠, 毛立彦, 唐毓玮, 卜朝阳, 卢家仕. 49份睡莲资源表型多样性分析及综合评价. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(11): 2670-2681. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2019.11.027. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2019.11.027
	SU Q, YANG Y H, TIAN M, ZHANG J Z, MAO L Y, TANG Y W, BU Z Y, LU J S. Phenotypic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 49 waterlily resources. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(11): 2670-2681. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2019.11.027. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2019.11.027
[23]	吴根松, 孙丽丹, 郝瑞杰, 石文芳, 张杰, 陈晶鑫. 梅花种质资源表型多样性研究. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(20): 12008-12009, 12012. doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2011.20.216. doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2011.20.216
	WU G S, SUN L D, HAO R J, SHI W F, ZHANG J, CHEN J X. Study on the phenotypic diversity of P. mume sieb. et Zucc.Germ plasm resources. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(20): 12008-12009, 12012. doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2011.20.216. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2011.20.216
[1]	KAMENETSKY R, DOLE J. Herbaceous peony (Paeonia): Genetics, physiology and cut flower production. Floriculture and Ornamental Biotechnology, 2012, 6: 62-77.
[2]	NING C L, JIANG Y, MENG J S, ZHOU C H, TAO J. Herbaceous peony seed oil: A rich source of unsaturated fatty acids and γ- tocopherol. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 2015, 117(4): 532-542. doi: 10.1002/ejlt.201400212
[24]	于超. 四倍体月季遗传连锁图谱的构建及部分观赏性状的QTLs分析[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2015.
	YU C. Construction of a genetic linkage map and QTLs analysis for phenotypic traits in tetraploid roses[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2015. (in Chinese)
[3]	QI Q M, LI Y, XING G P, GUO J, GUO X F. Fertility variation among Paeonia lactiflora genotypes and fatty acid composition of seed oil. Industrial Crops and Products, 2020, 152: 112540. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112540
[4]	秦魁杰. 芍药. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2004.
[25]	袁涛, 王莲英. 根据花粉形态探讨中国栽培牡丹的起源. 北京林业大学学报, 2002, 24(1): 5-11. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2002.01.002. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2002.01.002
	YUAN T, WANG L Y. Discussion on the origination of Chinese tree-peony cultivars according to pollen grain morphology. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2002, 24(1): 5-11. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2002.01.002. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2002.01.002
[4]	QIN K J. Herbaceous Peony. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2004. (in Chinese)
[5]	YANG Y, SUN M, LI S S, CHEN Q H, TEIXEIRA DA SILVA J A, WANG A J, YU X N, WANG L S. Germplasm resources and genetic breeding of Paeonia: A systematic review. Horticulture Research, 2020, 7(1): 107. doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0332-2. doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0332-2
[26]	李嘉珏. 中国牡丹起源的研究. 北京林业大学学报, 1998, 20(2): 22-26.
	LI J J. Studies on the origin of Chinese Mudan (tree peony). Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1998, 20(2): 22-26. (in Chinese)
[6]	王高潮, 陈煜超. 中国芍药品种鉴赏与培育. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2004.
	WANG G C, CHEN Y C. The Herbaceous Peonies of China. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2004. (in Chinese)
[7]	解孝满. 菏泽芍药品种资源调查及盆栽促成栽培技术的研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2005.
	XIE X M. Research on the resources and pot-facilitating cultivation of Paeonia lactiflora in Heze[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2005. (in Chinese)
[27]	HONG D Y, PAN K Y. Peonies of the World: Taxonomy and Phytogeography. United Kingdom: Royal Botanic Gardens, 2010.
[28]	NAZIR S, YAQOOB U, NAWCHOO I A, WANI A A, WANI S A. Phenological behaviour of Paeonia emodi Wall. ex Royle in response to habitat variability and altitude. Research & Reviews: Journal of Ecology, 2017, 6(1): 1-5.
[8]	王建国, 张佐双. 中国芍药. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2005.
	WANG J G, ZHANG Z S. Herbaceous Peonies of China. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2005. (in Chinese)
[29]	杨勇, 曾秀丽, 张姗姗, 张建军, 于晓南. 5种野生芍药在我国西南地区的地理分布与资源特点研究. 四川农业大学学报, 2017, 35(1): 69-74, 87. doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2017.01.010. doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2017.01.010
	YANG Y, ZENG X L, ZHANG S S, ZHANG J J, YU X N. Geographical distribution and resource characteristics of 5 wild peonies in southwest China. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2017, 35(1): 69-74, 87. doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2017.01.010. (in Chinese) doi: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2017.01.010
[9]	郭先锋, 臧德奎, 袁涛, 刘宪科, 王莲英. 我国栽培芍药溯源: 基于地理分布及形态特征的比较分析. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 39(3): 388-392.
	GUO X F, ZANG D K, YUAN T, LIU X K, WANG L Y. Discussion about the origin of cultivated herbaceous peonies native to China- Based on the comparative study of the geographical distribution and its morphological characters. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2008, 39(3): 388-392. (in Chinese)
[30]	HALDA J J, WADDICK J W. The Genus Paeonia. Portland: Timber Press, 2004: 201.
[10]	李嘉伟, 苏江硕, 张飞, 房伟民, 管志勇, 陈素梅, 陈发棣. 基于表型性状构建传统菊花核心种质. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(16): 3514-3526.
	LI J W, SU J S, ZHANG F, FANG W M, GUAN Z Y, CHEN S M, CHEN F D. Construction of core collection of traditional Chrysanthemum morifolium based on phenotypic traits. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(16): 3514-3526. (in Chinese)
[11]	SUN W H, YUAN X Y, LIU Z J, LAN S R, TSAI W C, ZOU S Q. Multivariate analysis reveals phenotypic diversity of Euscaphis japonica population. PLoS ONE, 2019, 14(7): e0219046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219046
[12]	王荣, 何智冲, 方学敏, 陈丹荔, 王琦, 孟家松, 赵大球. 扬州芍药栽培品种表型多样性分析. 植物科学学报, 2016, 34(6): 901-908. doi: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.60901. doi: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.60901
	WANG R, HE Z C, FANG X M, CHEN D L, WANG Q, MENG J S, ZHAO D Q. Analysis of phenotypic diversity of Paeonia lactiflora cultivars in Yangzhou. Plant Science Journal, 2016, 34(6): 901-908. doi: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.60901. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.60901
[13]	万映伶, 刘爱青, 张孔英, 刘燕. 菏泽和洛阳芍药品种资源表型多样性研究. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(3): 110-121. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170380. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170380
	WAN Y L, LIU A Q, ZHANG K Y, LIU Y. Phenotype diversity of herbaceous peony variety resources in Heze, Shandong of Eastern China and Luoyang, Henan of central China. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2018, 40(3): 110-121. doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170380. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170380
[14]	杨柳慧, 于晓南. 基于表型性状的芍药不同品种群亲缘关系分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(2): 209-216. doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.pngr.2016.02.003. doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.pngr.2016.02.003
	YANG L H, YU X N. Phylogenetic relationship analysis of different cultivars groups of herbaceous peony according morphological characteristics. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(2): 209-216. doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.pngr.2016.02.003. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.pngr.2016.02.003
[15]	张嘉. 基于SSR的中国芍药品种分子身份证构建及观赏性状关联分析[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016.
	ZHANG J. Molecular ID construction and association analysis of ornamental traits in peony cultivars based on SSR[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2016. (in Chinese)
[16]	王永康, 吴国良, 赵爱玲, 李登科. 枣种质资源的表型遗传多样性. 林业科学, 2014, 50(10): 33-41. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20141005. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20141005
	WANG Y K, WU G L, ZHAO A L, LI D K. Phenotypic genetic diversity of jujube germplasm resources. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(10): 33-41. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20141005. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20141005
[17]	郭英姿, 贾文庆, 刘会超, 何松林, 杜晓华, 王艳丽. 三十二个品种芍药观赏性状的主成分分析. 北方园艺, 2018(4): 110-116. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20172235. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20172235
	GUO Y Z, JIA W Q, LIU H C, HE S L, DU X H, WANG Y L. Principal component analysis of ornamental traits of thirty-two herbaceous peony varieties. Northern Horticulture, 2018(4): 110-116. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20172235. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20172235
[18]	董胜君, 王若溪, 张皓凯, 陈建华, 刘立新, 于庆福. 不同种源东北杏果实表型性状多样性分析. 植物资源与环境学报, 2020, 29(6): 42-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2020.06.05. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2020.06.05
	DONG S J, WANG R X, ZHANG H K, CHEN J H, LIU L X, YU Q F. Analysis on diversity of fruit phenotypic characters of Armeniaca mandshurica from differentprovenances. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2020, 29(6): 42-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2020.06.05. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2020.06.05
[19]	陆彭城, 郑燕, 周小琴, 徐喆, 艾叶, 周育真, 朱尾银, 彭东辉. 45个莲瓣兰品种的表型多样性研究. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(9): 2518-2525.
	LU P C, ZHENG Y, ZHOU X Q, XU Z, AI Y, ZHOU Y Z, ZHU W Y, PENG D H. Phenotypic diversity of 45 cultivars of Cymbidium tortisepalum. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(9): 2518-2525. (in Chinese)

Related Articles 15

[1]	CHEN MinDong, QIU BoYin, HUANG Hao, LI YongPing, WEN QingFang. Evaluation of Curd Texture Quality in Loose-Curd Cauliflower Germplasm [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1302-1316.
[2]	HE ZhiLin, SUN CuiXia, YUE HongLi, TAN YueXia, ZHANG YaoHai, WANG FuSheng, LIU SiTao, JIANG Dong. Genetic Diversity Analysis and GWAS of Alloocimene Based on Resequencing of Citron, Lemon Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(2): 386-401.
[3]	LÜ Tao, SUN GuoQing, GUO DongCai, CHEN QuanJia, CAI YongSheng, FAN BiaoXing, QU YanYing, ZHENG Kai. Development and Effectiveness Evaluation of InDel Molecular Markers Closely Linked to Fiber Strength QTL in Gossypium barbadense [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1684-1701.
[4]	XU YuJuan, ZHANG Jie, WANG TianYi, CHEN HaoYang, ZHAO JiaJia, WU BangBang, HAO YuQiong, LI XiaoHua, ZHENG XingWei, ZUO JingJing, ZHENG Jun. Identification of Glu-A3 and Glu-B3 of Low-Molecular-Weight Glutenin in Shanxi Wheat and Its Effect on Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(24): 5110-5127.
[5]	CHEN CaiJin, MA Lin, JIANG QingXue, LIU JinHui, MIAO Tong, ZHANG ZhiPeng, MENG Xiang, MA XiaoRan, ZHOU XinYue, ZHANG Jian, LIU WenHui, WANG XueMin. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Phenotypic Traits of 244 Forage Oat Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(23): 4825-4836.
[6]	TIAN XianXian, FENG ShaoFang, WANG Qing, PAN ChenDong, LI Bo, FANG KaiXing, WU HuaLing, QIN DanDan. Biochemical Characteristics Analysis and Suitability Evaluation of Liannan Daye Tea Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(22): 4797-4812.
[7]	WEI YiMin, ZHOU MeiLiang, TANG Yu. Origin, Evolution and Spread of Crop Buckwheat [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4305-4316.
[8]	CHEN TianXiao, CAO Rong, SONG QianNan, HU LiangLiang, WANG SuHua, WANG LiXia, CHENG XuZhen, CHEN HongLin. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance at the Seedling Stage and Screening of Tolerant Germplasm in Adzuki Bean (Vigna angularis) [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4317-4332.
[9]	LIU XiaoXu, ZHONG ZeXin, QIU JiaRen, YANG ChunXiao, ZHANG YongJun, XIE Wen, ZHANG YouJun, PAN HuiPeng. GENETIC DIVERSITY OF MTCO1 IN DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHICAL POPULATIONS OF MEGALUROTHRIPS USITATUS [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(21): 4361-4371.
[10]	CHEN YongXian, CHEN RuiJiang, DU YiZhi, ZHU JunJie, CHEN WanXia, ZHAO ZiHan, WANG JiChun, DU Kang, ZHANG Kai. Screening and Identification of Drought-Tolerant Sweet Potato Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(2): 214-237.
[11]	BAO MingFang, QIN Yan, CHEN CaiJin, ZHANG ShangPei, ZHANG GuoHui, SHA XiaoDi. Evaluation of 111 Alfalfa Germplasm Resources for Seedling Phenotypic Drought Tolerance Characterization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(19): 3825-3836.
[12]	GUO MengZe, ZHANG Lei, SUN PingPing, JIANG Biao, YAN JinQiang, LI ZhengNan. Molecular Characterization and Evolutionary Dynamics of Tomato Leaf Curl New Delhi Virus Isolate from Wax Gourd (Benincasa hispida) in Guangdong [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(19): 3890-3904.
[13]	MENG ZiNuo, FU ChangQing, ZHANG LingYu, GAO ShunJuan, CHANG JinHua, CUI JiangHui. Assessment of Salt Tolerance and Screening of Salt Tolerant Germplasm in Sorghum Seedling Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(16): 3317-3326.
[14]	LIU PengPeng, LI JiangBo, XU HongJun, NIE YingBin, HAN XinNian, KONG DeZhen, SANG Wei. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Protein Fractions and Quality in Xinjiang Winter Wheat Cultivar Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(15): 2948-2959.
[15]	WU HuiQin, WANG Jing, YANG Yi, LIU XueQing, ZHANG KaiXuan, WANG LuYao, LU JiaWei, ZHAI Yuan, CHENG Yan. Analysis and Evaluation of Fruit Texture Quality of 96 Pepper Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(14): 2854-2868.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

性状 Trait	H'	1 (%)	2 (%)	3 (%)	4 (%)	5 (%)	6 (%)	7 (%)	8 (%)	9 (%)	10 (%)	H'
性状 Trait	H'	1 (%)	2 (%)	3 (%)	4 (%)	5 (%)	6 (%)	7 (%)	8 (%)	9 (%)	10 (%)	菏泽 Heze	洛阳 Luoyang	扬州 Yangzhou	临洮 Lintao
花色 Flower color	1.90	8.10	0.60	15.30	17.60	17.90	16.50	3.20	19.90	0.90		1.31	0.68	0.72	0.17
花型 Flower type	1.88	4.30	2.30	9.00	15.00	0.60	21.10	1.20	10.70	4.90	30.90	1.39	0.88	0.92	0.38
花蕾颜色 Bud color	1.46	7.50	2.60	34.70	12.70	36.40	6.10					1.01	0.57	0.73	0.16
雄蕊瓣化程度 Degree of stamen petalization	1.42	6.70	7.50	18.20	31.80	35.80						1.10	0.59	0.63	0.15
花姿 Flower branch strength	1.09	36.10	37.90	26.00								0.89	0.52	0.58	0.14
花香 Flower fragrance	1.02	28.30	51.50	20.20								0.88	0.45	0.63	0.15
花期 Flower period	0.92	18.80	62.70	18.50								0.82	0.47	0.59	0.15
茎色 Stem color	0.78	71.10	23.40	2.30	3.20							0.81	0.43	0.43	0.15
花蕾形状 Bud shape	0.68	4.90	75.70	19.30								0.66	0.47	0.52	0.13
茎秆形状 Stem shape	0.64	66.50	33.50									0.67	0.43	0.52	0.14
侧蕾有无 Has side buds or not	0.60	71.70	28.30									0.63	0.43	0.52	0.12
花蕾是否绽口 Has chapped buds or not	0.29	8.70	91.30									0.50	0.36	0.43	0.13

性状 Trait	最小值 Minimum (cm)	最大值 Maximum (cm)	平均值 Average (cm)	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV	多样性指数 H′
株高 Plant height	38.50	100.50	68.74	11.52	16.75%	2.08
茎长 Stem length	43.19	120.00	76.07	12.42	16.33%	2.07
茎粗 Stem diameter	0.18	0.59	0.33	0.06	18.29%	1.99
蕾径 Bud diameter	1.22	3.99	2.31	0.49	21.08%	2.04
花高 Flower height	1.73	14.30	5.55	1.81	32.55%	2.01
花径 Flower diameter	3.11	19.50	12.32	1.93	15.65%	2.04
花梗长Pedicel length	5.57	40.00	14.48	3.75	25.89%	1.90

栽培地 Culture place	株高 Height	茎长 Stem length	花梗长 Pedicel length	茎粗 Stem diameter	蕾径 Bud diameter	花径 Flower diameter	花高 Flower height
菏泽 Heze	17.75%	17.00%	24.62%	16.39%	13.50%	13.92%	31.69%
洛阳 Luoyang	17.84%	18.46%	31.77%	16.86%	18.62%	18.74%	41.89%
扬州 Yangzhou	13.68%	13.16%	21.51%	9.72%	19.80%	13.29%	30.32%
临洮 Lintao	15.15%	13.65%	17.24%	17.32%	16.07%	12.40%	18.56%
平均值Average	16.11%	15.57%	23.78%	15.08%	17.00%	14.59%	30.62%

Phenotypic Diversity Analysis of Chinese Ornamental Herbaceous Peonies and Its Germplasm Resource Evaluation

RichHTML

PDF