Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (24): 4470-4483.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.24.003

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY·AGRICULTURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Canopy Equivalent Water Thickness Estimation of Cotton Based on Hyperspectral Index

YanChuan MA1,2,Hao LIU1,ZhiFang CHEN1,Kai ZHANG1,Xuan YU1,2,JingLei WANG1,JingSheng SUN1()   

  1. 1 Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Water Requirement and Regulation, Ministry of Agriculture, Xinxiang 453002, Henan
    2 Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2019-05-09 Accepted:2019-09-03 Online:2019-12-16 Published:2020-01-15
  • Contact: JingSheng SUN E-mail:jshsun623@163.com

RichHTML

27

PDF

742

Abstract:

【Objective】 The objective of the experiments is to develop a key method for fast and nondestructive monitoring canopy equivalent water thickness (CEWT) in cotton (Lumian 54) and to further improve the estimation accuracy of CEWT in cotton monitored by remote sensing technology. 【Method】 Through setting irrigation gradient treatment in different growth period, canopy spectral reflectance and canopy equivalent water thickness and other information were measured simultaneously. Firstly, we comprehensively analyzed the correlation between CEWT and various spectral parameters, including original spectral reflectance, first derivative spectral reflectance, all-band combined spectral index and existing spectral index. Then, we determined the optimal spectral indices of bud stage, flowering and bolls stage, and full growth period. Finally, we constructed a hyperspectral monitoring model of cotton CEWT by linear regression. 【Result】 The canopy equivalent water thickness and the original spectral reflectance show continuous sensitive bands in the near infrared band (NIR) of 780-1130 nm and the short wave infrared band (SWIR) of 1 450-1 830 nm and 1 950-2 450 nm, the sensitivity of the first derivative spectrum to CEWT was enhanced in NIR band than that of the original spectrum, but was weaker in SWIR band than that of the original spectrum. The correlation between the spectral index constructed by the original spectral reflectance and CEWT is stronger than that of the first derivative spectrum, and the ratio spectral index (RSI) is more suitable for the monitoring of CEWT than the normalized difference spectral index (NDSI). During the whole growth period, the inversion accuracy of CEWT by (R1135-5R1494)/R2003 was the best (R 2=0.7878, RRMSE=0.1803). In the bud stage, RSIb(1130,1996) has the best estimation effect on CEWT (R 2=0.7258, RRMSE=0.1444). RSIa (904,1952) was the optimal spectral index (R 2=0.7853, RRMSE=0.2454) for estimating CEWT at the flowering and bolls stage.【Conclusion】The new hyperspectral indexes proposed in this study in different growth stages can be used for quantitative monitoring of canopy equivalent water thickness in cotton. The results of this study can provide reference for the application of hyperspectral technology in monitoring water content of cotton canopy, and provide technical basis for precision irrigation of cotton.

Key words: hyperspectral index, cotton, canopy equivalent water thickness, estimation

Table 1

Irrigation amount in every stage of each treatment (mm)"

BI1 BI2 BI3 BI4 FI1 FI2 FI3 FI4
苗期 Seeding stage 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
蕾期 Bud stage 120 96 72 48 120 120 120 120
花铃期 Flowering and bolls stage 300 300 300 300 300 240 180 120
全生育期 Full growth 510 486 462 438 510 450 390 330

Table 2

Statistical description of canopy equivalent water thickness (mm)"

生育期
Growth stage		 样本
Sample		 均值
Mean value		 标准误
Standard error		 标准差
Standard deviation		 方差
Variance		 最大值
Max value		 最小值
Mix value		 样本数
Sample size
蕾期
Bud stage		 建模Calibration 0.2950 0.0158 0.1023 0.0105 0.5212 0.1383 42
检验Validation 0.3323 0.0332 0.1406 0.0198 0.6105 0.1480 18
总体Full 0.3060 0.0148 0.1149 0.0132 0.6105 0.1383 60
花铃期
Flowering and bolls stage		 建模Calibration 0.4946 0.0214 0.1682 0.0283 0.8723 0.2297 62
检验Validation 0.5272 0.0285 0.1662 0.0276 0.8498 0.2216 34
总体Full 0.5062 0.0171 0.1673 0.0280 0.8723 0.2216 96
全生育期
Full growth period		 建模Calibration 0.4140 0.0172 0.1750 0.0306 0.8723 0.1383 104
检验Validation 0.4597 0.0253 0.1823 0.0332 0.8498 0.1480 52
总体Full 0.4292 0.0143 0.1782 0.0317 0.8723 0.1383 156

Fig. 1

Correlationship of CEWT with original reflectance and first derivative reflectance r0.05 and r0.01 represent the horizontal lines of 0.05 significant correlation (r=0.157) and 0.01 significant correlation (r=0.206)"

Fig. 2

Contour maps of coefficients of determination(R2) for linear relationship between CEWT with RSI and NDSI during the full growth period (a) NDSI based on the original spectral; (b) RSI based on the original spectral; (c) NDSI based on the first derivative spectral; (d) RSI based on the first derivative spectral. The vertical coordinate is λ1 and the horizontal coordinate is λ2"

Fig. 3

Contour maps of coefficients of the top 10% determination (R2) for linear relationship between RSI and CEWT during the full growth period"

Fig. 4

Calibration and validation performance of RSI (1134,1533) during the whole growth period (a) Quantitative relationships between RSI (1134,1533) and CEWT; (b) The 1:1 relationship between the predicted and observed CEWT based on RSI (1134,1533)"

Fig. 5

Calibration and validation performance of RSIb (1130,1996) and RSIa (904,1952) in the bud stage and the flowering and bolls stage (a) Quantitative relationship between RSI (1130,1996) and CEWT during the bud stage; (b) The 1:1 relationship between the predicted and observed CEWT based on RSI (1130,1996) during the bud stage; (c) Quantitative relationships between RSI(904,1952)and CEWT during the flowering and bolls stage; (d) The 1:1 relationship between the predicted and observed CEWT based on RSI(904,1952) during the flowering and bolls stage"

Fig. 6

Calibration and validation performance of R1134/(R1533-0.5R2086) and (R1135-5R1494)/R2003 in each growth stage (a) Quantitative relationships between (R1135-5R1494)/R2003 and CEWT; (b) The 1:1 relationship between the predicted and observed CEWT based on(R1135-5R1494)/R2003; (c)Quantitative relationships between R1134/(R1533-0.5R2086) and CEWT; (d) The 1:1 relationship between the predicted and observed CEWT based on R1134/(R1533-0.5R2086)"

Table 3

Correlation analysis of CEWT with published spectral index and spectral index proposed in this paper"

光谱指数
Spectral index		 生育期
Growth stage		 建模 Calibration 检验 Validation
回归方程
Regression equation		 R2 SE n R2 RRMSE n
NDWI1240(R860,R1240)[16] 全生育期Full growth period y=-2.4144x+0.2131 0.348 0.141 104 0.234 0.346 52
WI(R970,R900)[30] 全生育期Full growth period y=-4.0076x+4.1002 0.408 0.134 104 0.272 0.338 52
SRWI(R858,1240)[42] 全生育期Full growth period y=1.0643x-0.8479 0.365 0.139 104 0.245 0.343 52
NDII(R850,R1650)[43] 全生育期Full growth period y=-0.4851x+0.2487 0.150 0.161 104 0.038 0.402 52
NDWI1200(R860,R1200)[44] 全生育期Full growth period y=-2.3652x+0.1715 0.338 0.142 104 0.259 0.341 52
NDWI1640(R860,R1640)[45] 全生育期Full growth period y=-1.3136x-0.0362 0.448 0.129 104 0.439 0.298 52
MSI(R1600,R820)[46] 全生育期Full growth period y=-1.0884x+0.9157 0.418 0.133 104 0.406 0.307 52
RSI(1134,1533) 全生育期Full growth period y=0.2639x-0.3392 0.700 0.095 104 0.724 0.210 52
RSIb(1130,1996) 蕾期Bud stage y=0.0316x-0.049 0.767 0.049 42 0.726 0.144 18
RSIa(904,1952) 花铃期Flowering and bolls stage y=0.0573x +0.0849 0.870 0.060 62 0.785 0.245 34
(R1135-5R1494)/R2003 全生育期Full growth period y = 0.0932x+0.6188 0.788 0.080 104 0.801 0.180 52
(R1135-5R1494)/R2003 蕾期Bud stage y=0.0893x+0.5864 0.688 0.060 42 0.761 0.229 18
(R1135-5R1494)/R2003 花铃期Flowering and bolls stage y=0.0853x+0.6204 0.712 0.091 62 0.740 0.162 34
[1] 孟兆江, 段爱旺, 刘祖贵, 张寄阳 . 根据植株茎直径变化诊断作物水分状况研究进展. 农业工程学报, 2005,21(2):30-33.
MENG Z J, DUAN A W, LIU Z G, ZHANG J Y . Advances on diagnosis of crop moisture content from changes in stem diameters of plants. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2005,21(2):30-33. (in Chinese)
[2] 唐菁, 杨承栋, 康红梅 . 植物营养诊断方法研究进展. 世界林业研究, 2005,18(6):45-48.
TANG J, YANG C D, KANG H M . Advances in methods of nutrition diagnosis for plants. World Forestry Research, 2005,18(6):45-48. (in Chinese)
[3] 张喜英 . 叶水势反映冬小麦和夏玉米水分亏缺程度的试验(简报). 植物生理学通讯, 1997,33(4):249-253.
ZHANG X Y . A Report on diagnosis of soil water deficiency of wheat and maize using leaf water potential. Plant Physiology Communications, 1997,33(4):249-253. (in Chinese)
[4] 高照阳, 张红梅, 常明勋 . 国内外土壤水分监测技术. 节水灌溉, 2004(2):28-29.
GAO Z Y, ZHANG H M, CHANG M X . Soil moisture monitoring technology at home and abroad. Water Saving Irrigation, 2004(2):28-29. (in Chinese)
[5] DANSON F M, STEVEN M D, MALTHUS T J, CLARK J A . High-spectral resolution data for determining leaf water content. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1992,13(3):10.
[6] BARET F, FOURTY T . Estimation of leaf water content and specific leaf weight from reflectance and transmittance measurements. Agronomie, 1997,17:455-464.
[7] RIANO D, VAUGHAN P, CHUVIECO E, ZARCO-TEJADA P J, USTIN S L . Estimation of fuel moisture content by inversion of radiative transfer models to simulate equivalent water thickness and dry matter content: Analysis at leaf and canopy level. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005,43(4):819-826.
[8] COLOMBO R, MERONI M, MARCHESI A, BUSETTO L, ROSSINI M, GIARDINO C, PANIGADA C . Estimation of leaf and canopy water content in poplar plantations by means of hyperspectral indices and inverse modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008,112(4):1820-1834.
[9] BARET F, FOURTY T . Estimation of leaf water content and specific leaf weight from reflectance and transmittance measurements. Agronomie, 1997,17:455-464.
[10] YI Q X, WANG F M, BAO A M, JIAPAER G . Leaf and canopy water content estimation in cotton using hyperspectral indices and radiative transfer models. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2014,33:67-75.
[11] LI L, CHENG Y B, USTIN S, HU X T, RIONO D . Retrieval of vegetation equivalent water thickness from reflectance using genetic algorithm (GA)-partial least squares (PLS) regression. Advances in Space Research, 2008,41(11):1755-1763.
[12] CHENG T, RIVARD B, SANCHEZ-AZOFEIFA A G . Spectroscopic determination of leaf water content using continuous wavelet analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011,115(2):659-670.
[13] CHENG T, RIVARD B, SANCHEZ-AZOFEIFA A G, FERET J B, JACQUEMOUD S, USTIN S L . Predicting leaf gravimetric water content from foliar reflectance across a range of plant species using continuous wavelet analysis. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2012,169(12):1134-1142.
[14] LI D, CHENG T, YAO X, ZHANG Z Y, TIAN Y C, ZHU Y, CAO W X .Wavelet-based PROSPECT inversion for retrieving leaf mass per area (LMA) and equivalent water thickness (EWT) from leaf reflectance.IEEE International Geoscience & Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2016, 6910-6913.
[15] 冯海宽, 李振海, 金秀良, 杨贵军, 万鹏, 郭建华, 于海洋, 杨福芹, 李伟国, 王衍安 . 基于EFAST和PLS的苹果叶片等效水厚度高光谱估算. 农业工程学报, 2016,32(12):165-171.
FENG H K, LI Z H, JIN X L, YANG G J, WAN P, GUO J H, YU H Y, YANG F Q, LI W G, WANG Y A . Estimating equivalent water thickness of apple leaves using hypersecptral data based on EFAST and PLS. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016,32(12):165-171. (in Chinese)
[16] GAO B C . NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996,58:257-266.
[17] CECCATO P, STEPHANE F, TARANTOLA S . Detecting vegetation leaf water content using reflectance in the optical domain. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2001,77(1):22-33.
[18] EITEL J U H, GESSLER P E, SMITH A M S . Suitability of existing and novel spectral indices to remotely detect water stress in Populus spp. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006,229:170-182.
[19] PALACIOS-ORUETA A, KHANNA S . Assessment of NDVI and NDWI spectral indices using MODIS time series analysis and development of a new spectral index based on MODIS shortwave infrared bands. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Processing. Trier,Germany, 2006: 207-209.
[20] KHANNA S, PALACIOS-ORUETA A, WHITING M L . Development of angle indexes for soil moisture estimation, dry matter detection and land-cover discrimination. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007,109(2):154-165.
[21] SEELIG H D, HOEHN A, STODIECK L S . Relations of remote sensing leaf water indices to leaf water thickness in cowpea, bean, and sugarbeet plants. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008,112(2):445-455.
[22] YILMAZ M T, HUNT E R, JACKSON T J . Remote sensing of vegetation water content from equivalent water thickness using satellite imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008,112(5):2514-2522.
[23] 王强, 易秋香, 包安明, 赵金 . 棉花冠层水分含量估算的高光谱指数研究. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2013,33(2):507-512.
WANG Q, YI Q X, BAO A M, ZHAO J . Discussion on hyperspectral index for the estimation of cotton canopy water content. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2013,33(2):507-512. (in Chinese)
[24] YI Q X, BAO A M, LUO Y, ZHAO J . Measuring cotton water status using water-related vegetation indices at leaf and canopy levels. Journal of Arid Land, 2012,4(3):310-319.
[25] YI Q X, BAO A M, WANG Q, ZHAO J . Estimation of leaf water content in cotton by means of hyperspectral indices. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2013,90:144-151.
[26] 冯先伟, 陈曦, 包安明, 孙莉, 王登伟, 马亚琴 . 水分胁迫条件下棉花生理变化及其高光谱响应分析. 干旱区地理, 2004,27(2):250-255.
FENG X W, CHEN X, BAO A M, SUN L, WANG D W, MA Y Q . Analysis on the cotton physiological change and its hyperspectral response under the water stress conditions. Arid Land Geography, 2004,27(2):250-255. (in Chinese)
[27] 苏毅, 王克如, 李少昆, 肖春华, 陈兵, 王方永, 唐强, 陈江鲁, 金秀良, 吕银亮, 王楷 . 棉花植株水分含量的高光谱监测模型研究. 棉花学报, 2010,22(6):554-560.
SU Y, WANG K R, LI S K, XIAO C H, CHEN B, WANG F Y, TANG Q, CHEN J L, JIN X L, LÜ Y L, WANG K . Monitoring models of the plant water content based on cotton canopy hyperspectral reflectance. Cotton Science, 2010,22(6):554-560. (in Chinese)
[28] LIU H, GAO Y, SUN J, WU X L, JHA S K, ZHANG H, GONG X W, LI Y . Responses of yield, water use efficiency and quality of short-season cotton to irrigation management: Interactive effects of irrigation methods and deficit irrigation. Irrigation Science, 2017,35(2):125-139.
[29] ALLEN R G, PEREIRA L S, RAES D, SMITH M . Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome,Italy, 1998.
[30] LIU L, ZHANG S, ZHANG B . Evaluation of hyperspectral indices for retrieval of canopy equivalent water thickness and gravimetric water content. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2016,37(14):3384-3399.
[31] YAO X, JIA W Q, SI H Y, GUO Z Q, TIAN Y C, LIU X J, CAO W X, ZHU Y . Exploring novel bands and key index for evaluating leaf equivalent water thickness in wheat using hyperspectra influenced by nitrogen. PLoS ONE, 2014,9(6):e96352.
[32] DEMETRIADES-SHAH T H, STEVEN M D, CLARK J A . High resolution derivative spectra in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1990,33(1):55-64.
[33] TIAN Y C, YAO X, YANG J, CAO W X, HANNAWAY D B, ZHU Y . Assessing newly developed and published vegetation indices for estimating rice leaf nitrogen concentration with ground- and space-based hyperspectral reflectance. Field Crops Research, 2011,120(2):299-310.
[34] PENUELAS J, FILELLA I, BIEL C, SERRANO L, SAVE R .The reflectance at the 950-970 nm region as an indicator of plant water status. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1993, 14(10):19.
[35] CARTER G A . Primary and secondary effects of water content on the spectral reflectance of leaves. American Journal of Botany, 1991,78(7):916-924.
[36] CURCIO J A, PETTY C C . The near infrared absorption spectrum of liquid water. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1951,41(5):302-304.
[37] SIMS D A, GAMON J A . Estimation of vegetation water content and photosynthetic tissue area from spectral reflectance: A comparison of indices based on liquid water and chlorophyll absorption features. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003,84(4):526-537.
[38] SEAGULL R W, GIAVALIS S . Pre-and post-anthesis application of exogenous hormones alters fiber production in Gossypium hirsutum L. cultivar Maxxa GTO. Journal of Cotton Science, 2004,8(2):105-111.
[39] STOW D, NIPHADKAR M, KAISER J . MODIS‐derived visible atmospherically resistant index for monitoring chaparral moisture content. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2005,26(17):3867-3873.
[40] SIMS D A, GAMON J A . Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002,81(2/3):337-354.
[41] 颜春燕 . 遥感提取植被生化组分信息方法与模型研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院, 2003.
YAN C Y . Study on methods and models for vegetation biochemical information retrieval by remote sensing[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2003. (in Chinese)
[42] ZARCO-TEJADA P J, RUEDA C A, USTIN S L . Water content estimation in vegetation with MODIS reflectance data and model inversion methods. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003,85(1):109-124.
[43] HARDISKY M A, SMART R M, KLEMAS V . Growth response and spectral characteristics of a short Spartina alterniflora salt marsh irrigated with freshwater and sewage effluent. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1983,13(1):57-67.
[44] WU C, NIU Z, TANG Q, HUANG W J . Predicting vegetation water content in wheat using normalized difference water indices derived from ground measurements. Journal of Plant Research, 2009,122(3):317-326.
[45] CHEN D, HUANG J, JACKSON T J . Vegetation water content estimation for corn and soybeans using spectral indices derived from MODIS near- and short-wave infrared bands. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005,98(2/3):225-236.
[46] HUNT E R, ROCK B N . Detection of changes in leaf water content using Near- and Middle-infrared reflectances. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1989,30(1):43-54.
[47] 田永超, 朱艳, 姚霞, 刘小军, 曹卫星 . 基于光谱信息的作物氮素营养无损监测技术. 生态学杂志, 2007,26(9):1454-1463.
TIAN Y C, ZHU Y, YAO X, LIU X J, CAO W X . Non-destructive monitoring of crop nitrogen nutrition based on spectral information. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007,26(9):1454-1463. (in Chinese)
[1] LI YuanJing, YUAN RuiXiang, LI YongTai, SUN TianGe, LIU Feng, LI YanJun, ZHANG XinYu. Identification and Functional Characterization of β-Glucosidase Genes in Verticillium dahliae for Pathogenicity on Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(7): 1380-1399.
[2] QIAN Jin, LI YingXue, WU Fang, ZOU XiaoChen. Improved Leaf Phosphorus Content Estimation of Winter Wheat Using Ensemble Hyperspectral Dimensionality Reduction Method [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(4): 781-792.
[3] YAN TingLin, DU YaDan, HU XiaoTao, WANG He, LI XiaoYan, WANG YuMing, NIU WenQuan, GU XiaoBo. The Impacts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Organic Alternatives Under Aerated Drip Irrigation on Cotton Yield and Water Use Efficiency Under Deficit Irrigation Conditions [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[4] FEI YaoYing, WANG Di, TANG WeiJie, GUO CaiLi, ZHANG XiaoHu, QIU XiaoLei, CHENG Tao, YAO Xia, JIANG ChongYa, ZHU Yan, CAO WeiXing, ZHENG HengBiao. Estimation of Rice Grain Protein Content Using Fusion Imagery from UAV-based Multi-Sensors [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(1): 41-56.
[5] GUO ChenLi, LIU Yang, CHEN Yan, HU Wei, WANG YouHua, ZHOU ZhiGuo, ZHAO WenQing. Effects of Phosphorus Fertilizer Postpone Under Nitrogen Reduction Condition on Yield, Phosphorus Fertilizer Utilization Efficiency of Drip-Irrigated Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(9): 1749-1766.
[6] WANG WeiMeng, WEI YunXiao, TANG YunNi, LIU MiaoMiao, CHEN QuanJia, DENG XiaoJuan, ZHANG Rui. Establishment and Rooting Optimization of Agrobacterium rhizogenes Transformation System in Cotton [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8): 1479-1493.
[7] ZHAO YuXuan, MIAO JiYuan, HU Wei, ZHOU ZhiGuo. Effects of Low Temperature at Seedling Stage on Cotton Floral Bud Differentiation and Cotton Plant Yield [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1311-1320.
[8] LI FangLiang, KONG QingBo, ZHANG Qing. Research on the Estimation Model of Calcium Content in Guanxi Honey Pomelo Leaves Based on Spectral Index [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(7): 1321-1332.
[9] TIAN LiWen, LOU ShanWei, ZHANG PengZhong, DU MingWei, LUO HongHai, LI Jie, PAHATI MaiMaiTi, MA TengFei, ZHANG LiZhen. Analysis of Problems and Pathways for Increasing Cotton Yield per Unit Area in Xinjiang Under Green and Efficient Production Mode [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1102-1115.
[10] WANG LiYuan, WANG Hui, WANG MuMu, WANG DongJian, LI RuYu, ZHENG YongSheng, ZHANG Han. Construction and Application of DNA Fingerprint Database for Known Varieties in Upland Cotton DUS Testing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(22): 4570-4588.
[11] TANG ChaoYuan, LIU TaoFen, WU YanQin, ZHANG QiPeng, LI ZiLiang, CHEN YunRui, LEI ZhangYing, ZHANG YaLi, ZHANG WangFeng, DU MingWei, YANG MingFeng, TIAN JingShan. Relationship Between Boll Morphological Characteristics and Fiber and Kernel Quality of Gossypium hirsutum L. and Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(15): 2980-2992.
[12] WEN Jin, NING YanFang, QIN Xin, LIU Yuan, ZHANG XiaoLing, ZHU YongHong, TIAN ShiMin, MA YanBin. Resistance Evaluation and Genetic Stability Analysis of Insect- Resistant and Glyphosate-Tolerant Transgenic Cotton Lines [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(12): 2291-2302.
[13] DONG Ming, QI Hong, ZHANG Qian, WANG Yan, WANG ShuLin, FENG GuoYi, LIANG QingLong, GUO BaoSheng. The Impact of Sowing Methods on the Seed Germination Environment and Cotton Emergence and Growth [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(12): 2346-2357.
[14] ZHANG YanJun, DAI JianLong, DONG HeZhong. On Multi-Objective Collaborative Cultivation in Cotton Production [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(10): 1908-1916.
[15] WU YuZhen, HUANG LongYu, ZHOU DaYun, HUANG YiWen, FU ShouYang, PENG Jun, KUANG Meng. Construction of SSR Fingerprint Library and Comprehensive Evaluation for Approved Cotton Varieties in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(8): 1430-1443.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备09089781号-30
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Scientia Agricultura Sinica
Tel: 86-010-82106279    E-mail: zgnykx@mail.caas.net.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd