Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 736-748.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.04.014

• STORAGE·FRESH-KEEPING·PROCESSING • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Storage Methods on Fruit Quality of ‘Newhall’ Navel Orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck‘Newhall’) in Southern Jiangxi Province

 HE  Yi-Zhong-1, CHEN  Zhao-Xing-1, 2 , LIU  Run-Sheng-1, FANG  Yi-Wen-2, GU  Zu-Liang-3, YAN  Xiang-2, CHEN  Hong-3, ZHANG  Hong-Ming-2, TANG  Huan-Qing-3, CHENG  Yun-Jiang-1   

  1. 1、Key Laboratory of Central China Horticultural Crop Biology and Germplasm Enhancement (Ministry of Agriculture) / Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education / College of Horticulture & Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070;
    2、Institute of Citrus Science Research of Ganzhou, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi;3 Research Center of Navel Orange Planting Technology of Anyuan County, Anyuan 342100, Jiangxi
  • Received:2013-07-03 Online:2014-02-15 Published:2013-10-10

Abstract: 【Objective】The objective of this study is to optimize the storage conditions of citrus and provide a scientific foundation for storage warehouse improvement.【Method】Storage experiments were performed with commercially mature ‘Newhall’ navel orange fruits using three storage methods, including mechanical cold storage (Mcs), evaporative cooling ventilating storage in mountainous region (Ecvs) and ventilating warehouse storage (Vws). Environmental parameters of these storage conditions were termly detected. Meanwhile, the fruit physiological and biochemical indexes were measured with gas chromatography and infra-red CO2 analyzer. Moreover, fruit organoleptic properties were evaluated as well. 【Result】 The environment parameters under the three storage conditions changed constantly. The temperature and relative humidity in Mcs ranged from 2.1℃ to 11.2℃ and 64.4% to 99.0%, respectively. As the weather gets warm, the temperature variations of Mcs between storehouse and transport or shelf life condition were significantly different from those of Ecvs and Vws. Although the changing trends of storage parameters in Ecvs were similar to those in Vws, industry experiences revealed that the storage condition was more suitable to orange storage in Ecvs than in Vws. The concentrations of CO2 and ethylene in Mcs were significantly higher than those in Ecvs and Vws. The contents of titratable acid, soluble solid and concentration of organic acids in fruit juice decreased with the extension of storage phase. Among these storage methods, there were significant differences in the content of titratable acid and malic acid, but not in total soluble solid in fruit juice. The content of titratable acidity after 105 days of storage (DOS) remained much higher in Ecvs than that in Mcs and Vws, and similar result was observed from the changing tendency of organic acids after 65 DOS. Prior to 135 DOS, fruit firmness, content of soluble sugar and vitamin C were higher in Mcs than those in Ecvs and Vws. The content of ethanol, acetaldehyde, methanol increased sharply at 105 DOS. At 160 DOS, the ethanol content was also significantly higher in Mcs than that in Ecvs and Vws, which aggravated fruit quality derogation and accumulated abundant off-flavor components in Mcs. During the storage, the hedonic scale of fruits in Ecvs and Vws fluctuated occasionally, the peak was observed at 35 DOS, subsequently declined gradually, and reached the lowest level at 135 DOS. Among these storage conditions, the lowest hedonic scale was detected in Mcs at 160 DOS.【Conclusion】In storage warehouse, the contents of fruit organic acids, ethanol, methanol and acetaldehyde were mainly affected by gas components, especially ethylene, and temperatures differences between storehouse and transport or shelf life conditions. And these indexes are directly related to fruit quality and organoleptic properties among these storage warehouses. Fruit quality in Mcs deteriorated at 135 DOS, while fruit in Ecvs could maintain relatively high quality until 160 DOS. Moreover, Vws is more suitable for orange short-term storage, as fruit quality degenerated gradually after 65 DOS.

Key words: ‘Newhall&rsquo, navel orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck‘Newhall’) , storage environment parameter , fruit quality , physiological and biochemical index , sensory evaluation

[1]程运江. 园艺产品贮藏运销学(第二版). 北京:中国农业出版社, 2011: 221-223.

Cheng Y J. Storage-transportation and Marketing of Horticultural Products, second Edition. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press, 2011: 221-223. (in Chinese)

[2]王日葵, 周炼, 韩爱华. 柑桔湿冷通风贮藏库的设计及效果分析. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(11): 355-360.

Wang R K, Zhou L, Han A H. Design and effect analysis of citrus ventilating storehouse with refrigerating and wetting system. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 26(11): 355-360. ( in Chinese)

[3]Ladaniya M S. Citrus Fruit: Biology, Technology and Evaluation. San Diego: Academic Press, 2008: 13-65.

[4]唐焕庆, 古祖亮, 龚慧宜, 郭玉玲, 杜秀英, 李卫敏. 安远县2010-2011年脐橙果品贮藏保鲜效果调查. 现代园艺, 2011, 14: 7-9.

Tang H Q, Gu Z L, Gong H Y, Guo Y L, Li W M. Present Survey on the Storage and fresh keeping of Navel Orange during 2010-2011 in Anyuan city. Xiandai Horticulture, 2011, 14: 7-9. ( in Chinese)

[5]古祖亮, 唐焕庆, 龚慧宜. 安远县脐橙山区水冷通风库贮藏库贮藏保鲜效果调查. 现代园艺, 2010, 11: 6-8.

Gu Z L, Tang H Q , Gong H Y. Present Survey on the Storage and fresh keeping of the Evaporative Cooling Ventilating Storage in Mountainous Region in Anyuan city. Xiandai Horticulture, 2010, 11: 6-8. ( in Chinese)

[6]Sun X H, Xiong J J, Zhu A D, Zhang L, Ma Q L, Xu J, Cheng Y J, Deng X X. Sugars and organic acids changes in pericarp and endocarp tissues of pumelo fruit during postharvest storage. Scientia Horticulturae, 2012, 142: 112-117.

[7]Torres J D, Chiralt A, Escriche I. Development of volatile fraction of fresh cut osmotically treated mango during cold storage. Food Chemistry, 2012, 130: 921-927.

[8]Goff S A, Klee H J. Plant volatile compounds: sensory cues for health and nutritional value? Science, 2006, 311: 815-819.

[9]Paul V, Pandey R. Role of internal atmosphere on fruit ripening and storability—a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2doi:10.1007/s13197-011-0583-x.

[10]Wang B G, Wang J H, Liang H, Yi J Y, Zhang J J, Lin L, Wu Y, Feng X Y, Cao J K, Jiang W B. Reduced chilling injury in mango fruit by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and the antioxidant response. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2008, 48: 172-181.

[11]Liu H, Song L L, You Y L, Li Y B, Duan X W, Jiang Y M, Joyce D  C, Ashraf M, Lu W J. Cold storage duration affects litchi fruit quality, membrane permeability, enzyme activities and energy charge during shelf time at ambient temperature. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2011, 60: 24-30.

[12]Roongruangsri W, Rattanapanone N, Leksawasdi N, Boonyakiat D. Influence of Storage Conditions on Physico-Chemical and Biochemical of Two Tangerine Cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2013, 5(2): 70-84.

[13]Tietel Z, Lewinsohn E, Fallik E, Porat R. Importance of storage temperatures in maintaining flavor and quality of Mandarins. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2012, 64: 175-182.

[14]Holland N, Nunes F L, de Medeiros I U D, Lafuente M T. High-temperature conditioning induces chilling tolerance in mandarin fruit: a cell wall approach. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2012, 92: 3039-3045.

[15]Tietel Z, Plotto A, Fallik E, Lewinsohn E, Porat R. Taste and aroma of fresh and stored mandarins. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2011, 91: 14-23.

[16]Alquezara B, Mesejob C, Alfereza F, Agustíb M, Zacarias L. Morphological and ultrastructural changes in peel of ‘Navelate’ oranges in relation to variations in relative humidity during postharvest storage and development of peel pitting. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2010, 56, 163-170.

[17]Paull R E. Effect of temperature and relative humidity on fresh commodity quality. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 1999, 15: 263-277.

[18]Henriod R E. Postharvest characteristics of navel oranges following high humidity and low temperature storage and transport. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2006, 42: 57-64.

[19]何天福. 柑橘学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999: 714-734.

He T F. Citrus. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural Press, 1999: 714-734. ( in Chinese)

[20]Alférez F, Agusti M, Zacaras L. Postharvest rind staining in Navel oranges is aggravated by changes in storage relative humidity: effect on respiration, ethylene production and water potential. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2003, 28: 143-152.

[21]Thompson A K. Controlled Atmosphere Storage of Fruits and Vegetables, Second Edition. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data, 2010: 15.

[22]Mayuonia L, Tietel Z, Patil B S, Porata R. Does ethylene degreening affect internal quality of citrus fruit? Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2011, 62: 50-58.

[23]Zhou J Y, Sun C D, Zhang L L, Dai X A, Xu C J, Chen K S. Preferential accumulation of orange-colored carotenoids in Ponkan (Citrus reticulata) fruit peel following postharvest application of ethylene or ethephon. Scientia Horticulturae, 2010, 126(2): 229-235.

[24]Sawsen S, Pilar N, Adela M, Jameleddine B, Alejandra S. New degreening treatments to improve the quality of citrus fruit combining different periods with and without ethylene exposure. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2012, 63: 25-32.

[25]Aharoni Y, Copel A, Fallik E. Storing ‘Galia’ Melons in a Controlled Atmosphere with Ethylene Absorbent. HortScience, 1993, 28(7): 725-726.

[26]Iglesias I, Echeverria G, Soria Y. Differences in fruit colour development, anthocyanin content, fruit quality and consumer acceptability of eight ‘Gala’ apple strains. Scientia Horticulturae, 2008, 119(1): 32- 40.

[27]宋钧, 于梁. 利用红外线CO2分析仪测定果蔬中呼吸强度的技术. 植物生理学通讯, 1987, 23(6): 60-62.

Song J, Yu L. Determination of fruit and vegetable respiration in storage condition with infra-red CO2 analyze. Plant Physiology Communications, 1987, 23(6): 60-62. ( in Chinese)

[28]王学奎. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.

Wang X K. Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiological and Biochemical Experiments. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006. ( in Chinese)

[29]Bartolozzi F, Bertazza G, Bassi D, Cristoferi G. Simultaneous determination of soluble sugars and organic acids as their trimethylsilyl derivatives in apricot fruits by gas-liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A, 1997, 758(1): 99-107.

[30]Paul L, Chace J D, William G. Determination of ethanol in citrus juice by gas chromatographic analysis of headspace. HortScience, 1969, 4(2): 117-118.

[31]Obenland D, Collin S, Mackey B, Sievert J, Arpaia M L. Storage temperature and time influences sensory quality of mandarins by altering soluble solids, acidity and aroma volatile composition. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2011, 59: 187-193.

[32]Kader A A. A perspective on postharvest horticulture (1978-2003). HortScience, 2003, 38(5): 1004-1008.

[33]Harker F R, Marsh K B, Young H,Murray S H,Gunson F A, Walker S B. Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 2:sweet and acid taste of apple fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2002, 24: 241-265.

[34]Etienne A, Génard M, Lobit P, Mbeguié-A-Mbéguié D, Bugaud C. What controls fleshy fruit acidity? A review of malate and citrate accumulation in fruit cells. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64 (6): 1451-1469.

[35]Pailly O, Tison G, Amouroux A. Harvest time and storage conditions of ‘Star Ruby’ grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) for short distance summer consumption. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2004, 34(1): 65-73.

[36]Shi J X, Riov J, Goren R, Goldschmid E E. Regulatory Aspects of Ethanol Fermentation in Immature and Mature Citrus Fruit. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 2007, 132(1): 126-133.

[37]邵蒲芬, 胡西琴, 戚淑先, 王日葵, 朱让果. 影响柑桔贮藏果实乙醇含量的因素. 中国柑橘, 1994, 23(4): 34-35.

Shao P F, Hu X Q, Qi S X, Wang R K, Zhu R G. Impact factors on ethanol content of citrus during storage. Chinese citrus, 1994, 23(4): 34-35. ( in Chinese)

[38]王日葵, 周炼, 陈婷, 刘涛. 制冷贮藏温度对锦橙的影响. 农产品加工(学刊), 2010, 202(3): 8-10.

Wang R K, Zhou L, Chen T, Liu T. Effect of temperature on Jincheng orange in cold storage. Academic Periodical of Farm Products Processing, 2010, 202(3)3: 8-10. ( in Chinese) 

[39]Schirra M. Behaviour of ‘Star Ruby’ grapefruits under chilling and non-chilling storage temperatures. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 1992, 2(4): 315-327.

[40]Chalutz E, Waks J, Nadel M S. A comparison of the response of different citrus fruit cultivars to storage temperature. Scientia Horticulturae, 1985, 25(3): 271-277.

[41]Rapisarda P, Bellomo S E, Intelisano S. Storage temperature effects on blood orange fruit quality. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2001, 49: 3230-3235.

[42]Obenland D, Collin S, Sievert J, Fjeld K, Doctorc J, Arpaia M L. Commercial packing and storage of navel oranges alters aroma volatiles and reduces flavor quality. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2008, 47: 159-167.

[43]Marcilla A, Zarzo M, del Río M A. Effect of storage temperature on the flavour of citrus fruit. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 2006, 4(4): 336-344.

[44]Porat R, Weiss B, Cohen L, Daus A, Goren R, Droby S. Effects of ethylene and 1-methylcyclopropene on the postharvest qualities of Shamouti oranges. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 1999, 15: 155-163.

[45]D’Aquino S, Piga A, Agabbio M, McCollum T G. Film wrapping delays ageing of ‘Minneola’ tangelos under shelf-life conditions. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 1998, 14: 107-116.

[46]Obenland D, Collin S, Sievert J, Arpaia L M. Mandarin flavor and aroma volatile composition are strongly influenced by holding temperature. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2013, 82: 6-14.
[1] CHEN MinDong, QIU BoYin, HUANG Hao, LI YongPing, WEN QingFang. Evaluation of Curd Texture Quality in Loose-Curd Cauliflower Germplasm [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(6): 1302-1316.
[2] ZHANG LiDong, GUO YiCong, HUANG HongYu, NIE Jing, WANG Bing, LI MengYu, LI JiaWang, SUI XiaoLei, LI YuHe. Correlation Analysis of Cucumber Fruit Quality Integrating Sensory Evaluation with Nutritional Traits and Flavor Compound Characteristics [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2026, 59(5): 1087-1100.
[3] ZHANG YaFeng, DONG WeiJin, LI QiYun, LU Yang, ZHANG ZhengKun, SUI Li. Effect of Interaction Between Beauveria bassiana and Potassium on Tomato Fruit Quality [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(6): 1131-1144.
[4] CHU TianShuo, CHEN XiaoAn, ZHU JinJin, WANG Ce, LOU Wei. Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Growth, Yield and Quality of Gannan Navel Orange During Critical Fertility Period [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(24): 5247-5258.
[5] WANG Di, HAN ShouAn, ZHANG Wen, WANG Min, SHI HuiDong, ZHU XueHui, BAI ShiJian, LIU XuPeng, TIAN Jia, XIE Hui. Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on Fruit and Raisin Quality of Thompson Seedless Grapes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(18): 3767-3782.
[6] DONG Jie, ZHANG Peng, LI WangZe, LI HeFang, ZHOU GuoChao, CHEN KeQin, FANG YuLin, ZHANG KeKun. Effects of Seedlessness and Swelling Treatments Based on GA3 and CPPU on the Fruit Quality of 'Shine Muscat' Grapes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(10): 2008-2021.
[7] LI JiaHui, LI YueQi, ZHOU XiaoFang, FAN GuoYuan, LI AiHua, TAO YongSheng. Analysis of Multidimensional Characterization Methods for Tannin Quality in Dry Red Wine [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(10): 2022-2034.
[8] ZHANG SiNing, ZHANG XingRui, WU DongXuan, KANG JingBo, CHEN XiaoLin, GENG LiJun, YIN GuangMin, CHEN JiaJing, GAO JunYan, CAI ZhongHu, LIU Yuan, XU Juan. Aroma Quality Analysis of Guangdongxiangshui Lemon Based on Molecular Sensory Technology [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(1): 141-155.
[9] YANG YaHeng, JIA PeiLong, NIE LanChun, ZHAO WenSheng, ZHAO JiaTeng, WANG JinXiang, LIU Jie. Evaluation of Fruit Texture Quality in Melon [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(8): 1560-1574.
[10] ZHU DaWei, ZHENG Xin, YU Jing, MOU RenXiang, CHEN MingXue, SHAO YaFang, ZHANG LinPing. Differences in Physicochemical Characteristics and Eating Quality Between High Taste Northern Japonica Rice and Southern Semi- Glutinous Japonica Rice Varieties in China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(3): 469-483.
[11] PAN Jing, MENG ZhiHao, WANG Sen, WANG HaiBo, HE Ping, CHANG YuanSheng, ZHENG WenYan, LI LinGuang, WANG Chen, WANG Ping, HE XiaoWen. Diversity Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Fruit Quality Traits in Reciprocal Cross Progenies of Apple Golden Delicious and Fuji Nagafu No.2 [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(24): 4945-4963.
[12] XIE Qian, JIANG Lai, DING MingYue, LIU LingLing, CHEN QingXi. Metabolomic Analysis of Canarium album Fresh Food Quality Differences Based on Sensory Evaluation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(2): 363-378.
[13] FAN Peng, YANG TianLe, ZHU ShaoLong, WANG ZhiJie, ZHANG MingYue, WEI HaiYan, LIU GuoDong. Preliminary Study on Appearance Quality Evaluation of Semi-Waxy Rice in Yangtze River Delta Region [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(16): 3105-3115.
[14] ZENG YanXin, GONG HaoNan, YOU ChunXiang, LU JingSheng, GAO WenSheng, WANG XiaoFei. Effects of Different Rootstocks on Growth and Fruit Quality of Young Ruixianghong Apple Trees with Multi-Stem Shape [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(14): 2847-2861.
[15] GAO ChengAn, WAN HongJian, YE QingJing, CHENG Yuan, LIU ChenXu, HE Yong. Identification and Comparative Analysis of Processed/Fresh-Eating Chili Pepper Fruits at Different Maturation Stages by Metabolomics [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(12): 2424-2438.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!