Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (7): 1326-1333.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.07.015

• ANIMAL SCIENCE·VETERINARY SCIENCERE·SOURCE INSECT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Exogenous Protease on in vitro Dry Matter Digestibility and Enzymatic Hydrolysate Gross Energy of Diets for Broilers

ZHANG LiLan, CHEN Liang, ZHONG RuQing, ZHANG HongFu   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition/Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193
  • Received:2016-07-13 Online:2017-04-01 Published:2017-04-01

Abstract: 【Objective】 The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of exogenous protease supplementation on the in vitro dry matter digestibility (DMD) and enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy (EHGE) using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system (CCSDS) and obtain the optimum protease supplementation into a corn-soybean meal-based diet for broilers. It would provide a reference for the establishment of in vitro method for efficacy evaluation of exogenous enzyme.【Method】 A single factor completely randomized design with 8 treatments was adopted and each treatment contained 5 replicates with 1 digestion tube per replicate was adopted in the present study. The control diets for starter and finisher phrases (24.29% and 21.72% of crude protein, respectively, dry matter basis) of broilers were formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements for broilers, and the test diets were supplemented with 0, 15 000, 75 000, and 150 000 PROT·kg-1 exogenous protease (90 000 PROT·g-1 ) into the control diets for starter and finisher phrases of broilers, respectively. The DMD, in vitro gross energy digestibility (GED) and EHGE of the diets were determined using a CCSDS (SDS-II). The correlation between DMD or EHGE and protease supplementation (PS) of diets were also analyzed. 【Result】 The results showed as follow: 1) The in vitro total tract DMD, GED and EHGE of diets increased as the level of exogenous protease supplementation in the control diet for starter and finisher phrases of broilers increased (linear, P<0.01). 2) The in vitro gastric DMD and GED of diets decreased as the level of exogenous protease supplementation in the control diet for starter phrases of broilers increased (linear, P<0.01). However, the in vitro gastric DMD and GED of diets were not affected by the exogenous protease supplementation in the finisher control diet (P>0.05). 3) A linear regression analysis, taking into account protease supplementation (g·kg-1), explained the DMD (%) of starter and finisher diets for DMD = 2.56 PS - 0.82 PS × PS + 73.90 (R2 = 0.82, RSD = 0.42, P<0.001) and DMD = 3.56 PS – 1.46 PS × PS + 75.20 (R2 = 0.70, RSD = 0.60, P<0.001), respectively. A linear regression analysis, taking into account protease supplementation (g·kg-1), explained the EHGE (MJ·kg-1) of starter and finisher diets for EHGE = 0.75 PS - 0.30 PS × PS + 15.02 (R2 = 0.89, RSD = 0.07, P<0.001) and EHGE = 0.61 PS - 0.30 PS × PS + 15.67 (R2= 0.79, RSD = 0.06, P<0.001), respectively. There was greatest EHGE when protease supplementation was  112 500 PROT·kg-1 in a starter diet and 91 800 PROT·kg-1 in a finisher diet, respectively. 【Conclusion】 In conclusion, the in vitro gastrointestinal DMD, GED and EHGE were increased by the protease supplementation into a corn-soybean diets for broilers. However, the effect of protease supplementation on nutrition digestibility in different intestinal segments was not simple consistent with a dose-response pattern. The 112 500 PROT·kg-1 of protease supplementation in a starter diet and 91 800 PROT·kg-1 of protease supplementation in a finisher diet for broilers may improve more effectively in the present study.

Key words: exogenous protease, dry matter digestibility, enzymatic hydrolysate gross energy, computer-controlled simulated digestion system, broiler

[1]    MARKETSANDMARKETS. Feed enzymes market by type [phytase, protease, and non-starch polysaccharides (xylanase, β-glucanase, cellulase, mannanase & pectinase)], livestock (swine, poultry, ruminants, and aquatic animals)& by region - global trends & forecast to 2020. Pure:Marketsandmarkets, 2015. http://www.marketsandmarkets. com/Market-Reports/feed-enzyme-market-1157.html
[2]    陈亮, 张宏福, 高理想, 赵峰. 仿生法评定饲料干物质消化率的影响因素. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(15): 3199-3205.
CHEN L, ZHANG H F, GAO L X, ZHAO F. Factors affecting the measure of the in vitro dry matter digestibility of feeds using simulative digestion system. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(15): 3199-3205.(in Chinese)
[3]    ALABI O O, ATTEH J O, ADEJUMO I O. Comparative evaluation of in vitro and in vivo nutrient digestibility of dietary levels of rice husk supplemented with or without commercial enzyme. International Journal, 2015, 2(6): 15-19.
[4]    MALATHI V, DEVEGOWDA G. In vitro evaluation of nonstarch polysaccharide digestibility of feed ingredients by enzymes. Poultry Science, 2001, 80(3): 302-305.
[5]    KONG C, PARK C S, KIM B G. Effects of an enzyme complex on in vitro dry matter digestibility of feed ingredients for pigs. Springer Plus, 2015, 4(1):1-4.
[6]    COLES L T, MOUGHAN P J, DARRAGH A J. In vitro digestion and fermentation methods, including gas production techniques, as applied to nutritive evaluation of foods in the hindgut of humans and other simple-stomached animals. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2005, 123: 421-444.
[7]    ZHAO F, REN L Q, MI B M, TAN H Z, ZHAO J T, LI H, ZHANG H F, ZHANG Z Y. Developing a computercontrolled simulaterrd digestion system to predict the concentration of metabolizable energy of feedstuffs for rooster. Journal of Animal Science, 2014, 92 (4):1537-1547.
[8]    ZHAO F, ZHANG L, MI B M, ZHANG H F, HOU S S. Using a computercontrolled simulaterrd digestion system to predict the energetic value of corn for ducks. Poultry Science, 2014, 93(6): 1410-1420.
[9]    CHEN L, GAO L X, HUANG Q H, Lu Q P, SARENNA, ZHANG H F. Prediction of digestible energy of feed ingredients for growing pigs using a computer-controlled simulated digestion system. Journal of Animal Science, 2014, 92(9): 3887-3894.
[10]   赵峰, 米宝民, 任立芹, 王钰明, 张宏福. 基于单胃动物仿生消化系统的鸡仿生消化法测定饲料酶水解物能值变异程度的研究. 动物营养学报, 2014(6): 1535-1544.
ZHAO F, MI B M, REN L Q, WANG Y M, ZHANG H F. Variation of the method for determining the enzyme hydrolysate gross energy of feedstuff by in vitro bionic digestion based on simulated digestion system for broilers. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2014(6): 1535-1544. (in Chinese)
[11]   侯小锋. 非淀粉多糖酶制剂对肉仔鸡日粮能量代谢率的调控及其体外评定方法的研究[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2005.
HOU X F. The effects of non-starch polysaccharide enzyme on energy manipulation and control in broiler diets and prediction of digestibility with a in viro method [D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2005.(in Chinese)
[12]   何科林, 萨仁娜, 高杰, 李东卫, 庄晓峰, 张宏福. 体外法优化肉鸡日粮非淀粉多糖酶. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(21):4457-4464.
HE K L, SARENNA, GAO J, LI D W, ZHUANG X F, ZHANG H F. Study on optimization of non-starch polysaccharide enzymes of broiler diets in vitro. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(21): 4457-4464 (in Chinese)
[13]   赵峰, 张宏福, 张子仪. 单位动物仿生消化系统操作手册. 2版. 北京:中国农业科学院畜牧研究所, 2011.
ZHAO F, ZHANG H F, ZHANG Z Y. Operation Manual of Simulative Digestion System. Second edition. Beijing: Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2011. (in Chinese)
[14]   JUNG S, ROUSSEL-PHILIPPE C, BRIGGS J L, MURPHY P A JOHNSON L A. Limited hydrolysis of soy proteins with endo-and exoproteases. Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society, 2004, 81(10): 953-960.
[15]   KUROZAWA L E, PARK K J, HUBINGER M D. Optimization of the enzymatic hydrolysis of chicken meat using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Science, 2008, 73(5): C405-C412.
[16]   GBOGOURI G A, LINDER M, FANNI J,  PARMENTIER M. Influence of hydrolysis degree on the functional properties of salmon byproducts hydrolysates. Journal of Food Science, 2004, 69(8): C615-C622.
[17]   怀宝东. 丝氨酸蛋白酶工程菌的构建及改性大豆分离蛋白应用研究[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2013.
HUAI B D. Serine protease engineered bacteria to build and modified soy protein isolate application research [D]. Daqing: Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2013. (in Chinese)
[18]   翁凌, 李腾, 阴利华, 孙乐常, 苏文金, 曹敏杰. 南美白对虾丝氨酸蛋白酶的分离纯化及性质研究. 集美大学学报(自然科学版), 2010(4): 272-278.
WENG L, LI T, YIN L H, SUN L C, SU W Q, CAO M J. Purification and characaterization of serine proteinase from pacific white shrimp. Journal of Jimei University ( Nature Science ), 2010(4): 272-278.( in Chinese)
[19]   MAHAGNA M, NIR I, LARBIER M, NITSAN Z. Effect of age and exogenous amylase and protease on development of the digestive tract, pancreatic enzyme activities and digestibility of nutrients in young meat-type chicks. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 1995, 35(2): 201-212.
[20]   YU B, WU S T, LIU C C, GAUTHIER R, CHIOU P W S. Effects of enzyme inclusion in a maize–soybean diet on broiler performance. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2007, 134(3): 283-294.
[21]   胥九兵, 余晓斌, 王丽菊. 利用蛋白酶产生菌固态发酵去除豆粕中抗原蛋白. 生物加工过程, 2008, 6(3): 48- 51.
XU J B, YU X B, WANG L J. Removal of antigen protein in soybean meal by a proteinase producing bacillus subtilis strain. Chinese Journal of Bioprocess Engineering, 2008, 6(3): 48-51. (in Chinese)
[22]   LINDEMANN M D, CORNELIUS S G, EL KANDELGY S M,  MOSER R L, Pettigrew J E. Effect of age, weaning and diet on digestive enzyme levels in the piglet. Journal of Animal Science, 1986, 62(5): 1298-1307.
[23]   周梁. 外源蛋白酶(ProAct)对肉鸡生产性能及氨基酸消化率影响的研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2014.
ZHOU L. The study of a exogenous protease (ProAct) on performance and amino acids digestibility in broiler chicken[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2014.( in Chinese)
[24] FRU-NJI F, KLUENTER A M, FISCHER M,  Pontoppidan K. A feed serine protease improves broiler performance and increases protein and energy digestibility. Poultry Science, 2011, 48(4): 239-246.
[25] ANGEL C R, SAYLOR W, VIEIRA S L, WARD N. Effects of a monocomponent protease on performance and protein utilization    in 7-to 22-day-old broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 2011, 90(10): 2281-2286.
[1] WANG XueJie,XING Shuang,ZHAO ShaoMeng,ZHOU Ying,LI XiuMei,LIU QingXiu,MA DanDan,ZHANG MinHong,FENG JingHai. Effects of Heat Stress on Ileal Microbiota of Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(17): 3450-3460.
[2] DING Peng,TONG YueYue,LIU HuiChao,YIN Xin,LIU JiangJun,HE Xi,SONG ZeHe,ZHANG HaiHan. Dynamic Changes of Yolk Microbiota in Yellow-Feathered Broiler and Its Role on Early Colonization of Intestinal Microbiota During the Embryonic Stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(14): 2837-2849.
[3] CHEN ZhiMin,CHANG WenHuan,ZHENG AiJuan,CAI HuiYi,LIU GuoHua. Effect of Expanded Feather Powder on Growth Performance, Slaughter Performance and Serum Biochemical Index of Broiler [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(13): 2643-2653.
[4] SHU JingTing,JI GaiGe,SHAN YanJu,ZHANG Ming,JU XiaoJun,LIU YiFan,TU YunJie,SHENG ZhongWei,TANG YanFei,JIANG HuaLian,ZOU JianMin. Expression Analysis of IGF1-PI3K-Akt-Dependent Pathway Genes in Skeletal Muscle and Liver Tissue of Yellow Feather Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(9): 2027-2038.
[5] YuYan YANG,YaoWen LI,Shuang XING,MinHong ZHANG,JingHai FENG. The Temperature-Humidity Index Estimated by the Changes of Surface Temperature of Broilers at Different Ages [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(6): 1270-1279.
[6] ZHANG Lan,WANG LiangZhi,HUANG YanLing,LIAO XiuDong,ZHANG LiYang,LÜ Lin,LUO XuGang. Effects of Dietary Supplemental Pattern of Trace Eloments on the Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Meat Quality of Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(22): 4906-4916.
[7] Zhen LI,ShiXiong YANG,Sheng NIU,Ning ZHANG,Xin LI,YangYang ZHANG,YunFei JIA,ZhiXiong TIAN,GuanBao NING,Ding ZHANG,WenXia TIAN. Effect of Recombinant GSTA3 Protein on Expression of the Anti-Apoptotic Gene BAG-3 in Thiram-Induced Tibial Chondrodysplasia [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(9): 1921-1930.
[8] SUN YongBo,WANG Ya,SA RENNA,ZHANG HongFu. Effects of Chronic Ammonia Stress on Serum Metabolites of Broilers Based on GC-MS [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(8): 1688-1698.
[9] Shuang XING,JingHai FENG. Effects of Lactobacillus Supplements on Growth Performance of Broilers: A Meta-Analysis [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(1): 183-190.
[10] YANG YuYan,WANG XueJie,ZHANG MinHong,FENG JingHai. The Upper Limit Temperature of Thermoneutral Zone Estimated by the Changes of Temperature and Respiration Rate of the Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(3): 550-557.
[11] Wei ZHANG,JinJun DAI,XueHai YANG,JinTao WEI,MingXin CHEN,JunPeng HU,ShaoWen HUANG. Evaluation of Apparent Metabolic Energy, Nitrogen Corrected Metabolic Energy, Biological Value of Protein and Ileal Digestibility of Amino Acid of Yeast Hydrolysate for Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(20): 3685-3694.
[12] SUN YongBo,WANG Ya,SA RenNa,ZHANG HongFu. Effects of Different Relative Humidities on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity and Immune Function of Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(24): 4720-4728.
[13] CHANG ShuangShuang,LI Meng,LI XiuMei,SHI YuXiang,ZHANG MinHong,FENG JingHai. Effects of the Daily Cycle Variation of the Moderate Ambient Temperatures on the Serum Brain Gut Peptide and the Diversity of Caecal Microflora in Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(22): 4364-4372.
[14] PENG Qian-qian, WANG Xue-min, ZHANG Min-hong, FENG Jing-hai, ZHEN Long, ZHANG Shao-shuai . Effects of Constant Moderate Temperatures on the Diversity of the Intestinal Microbial Flora of Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(1): 186-194.
[15] LI Hong, DONG Shuo, XIONG Ying, GU Ming-can, GUO Kai-jun. Effect of Chestnut Involucres Polyphenols on Growth Performance and Antioxidant Properties of AA Broilers [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(4): 788-795.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!