Scientia Agricultura Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (7): 1263-1270.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.07.009

• SOIL & FERTILIZER·WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION·AGROECOLOGY & ENVIRONMENT • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Zn-Toxicity Thresholds as Determined by Micro Morphological Endpoints of Barley Roots in Polluted Soils and Its Prediction Models

HE Jun1, TIAN Xinzhu1,3, WANG Xuedong1, LIU Bin2, LI Ning2, ZHENG Han2, MENG Nan2, CHEN Shibao2   

  1. 1College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048; 2Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081; 3Beijing Environmental Impact Assessment Center, Beijing 100161
  • Received:2016-09-02 Online:2017-04-01 Published:2017-04-01

Abstract: 【Objective】With the continuous requirements for the management of contaminated soil, intensive studies on the ecological risk assessment of contaminated soil are increasingly important. At present, the toxicity test based on species sensitivity distribution for ecological risk assessment of regional contaminated soil has been becoming more and more important compared with the toxicity test based on single species. The toxicity assay should include not only the test for throughout the life cycle, but also the sensitivity of different test endpoints. Toxicity thresholds of Zn determined with different test endpoints are important for evaluation of the environmental risk of Zn in polluted soils. Root ecology plays an important role in the ecological risk assessments and the derivation of toxicity thresholds of heavy metals in polluted soils. The Zn toxicity thresholds (ECx, x=10, 50) of barley as determined by total root length, number of root tips, root surface area and the average diameter of barley root and the quantitative relationships between the ECx and soil properties were studied with the aim to provide basic data for environmental risk evaluation of Zn polluted soils. 【Method】 Eight kinds of field soils with various properties were collected around China, Zn (ZnCl2) was applied and the treated soils were used in a pot experiment after 4 weeks of incubation. Different micro morphological endpoints of barley roots were measured with root scanner (STD1600 Epson), the Zn toxicity thresholds (ECx, x=10, 50) of barley were determined based on the dose-responsive curve with Log-logistic model, the prediction models of Zn toxicity thresholds were developed based on the total Zn concentrations and soil properties (e.g. pH, CEC and org-C etc).【Result】The results indicated that toxicity thresholds of Zn varied significantly among the different micro morphological endpoints of barley roots. The average EC10 and EC50 determined with total root length, number of root tips, root surface area and the average diameter of the root were 228, 295, 335, 261 mg·kg-1 and 702, 779, 837, 739 mg·kg-1, respectively. The smallest ECx were observed with the test of number of root tips while the maximum ECx were observed with endpoint of root surface area, which indicated that the growth of root tips is the most sensitive endpoint among the root micro morphological endpoints of barley when it is stressed by Zn pollution in soil. Meanwhile, the variation coefficient of EC10 (43.4%) was generally higher than that of EC50 (21.6%). A positive correlation was found between ECx (x=10, 50) and the background Zn contents, soil properties (pH, OC contents), and correlation coefficient of pH between ECx reached was very significant (P<0.01).【Conclusion】It was found that the growth of root tips is more sensitive than other root micro morphological endpoints when stressed by Zn pollution in soil. The toxicity thresholds of Zn to plant can be predicted very well based on soil pH, OC, and soil Zn background concentration.

Key words: Zn, toxicity threshold, barley, root micro morphology, predict models

[1]    Sanuders A V, Craig W J, Baines S K. Zinc and vegetarian diets. The Medical Journal of Australia, 2012, 1(2): 17-21.
[2]    李荣华, 沈锋, 李晓龙, 张增强. 陕西某铅锌冶炼厂区及周边农田重金属污染土壤的稳定化修复理论与实践. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(7): 1269-1276.
Li R H, Shen F, Li X L, ZHANG Z Q. The theory and practice of the stabilization of heavy metal contaminated soil in a lead zinc smelting plant and its surrounding field soil in Shaanxi. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2015, 34(7): 1269-1276. (in Chinese)
[3]    宋伟, 陈百明, 刘琳. 中国耕地土壤重金属污染概况. 水土保持研究, 2013, 4(15): 922-930.
Song W, Chen B M, Liu L. Soil heavy metal pollution of cultivated land in China. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 4(15): 922-930. (in Chinese)
[4]    中华人民共和国卫生部. 食品安全国家标准: 食品中污染物限量. GB 2762-2012.
Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. National food safety standards. GB 2762-2012.
[5]    宋宁宁, 黄锦孙, 郭雪雁, 程旺大, 张红梅, 王伯仁, 韦东普, 马义兵. 土壤铜植物毒害的不同评价终点和室内外测定差别研究. 生态毒理学报, 2014, 9(4): 689-698.
Song N N, Haung J S, Guo X Y, Cheng W D, Zhang H M, Wang B R, Wei D P, Ma Y B. Differences between laboratory and field tests for phytotoxicity of copper in soils using different assessment endpoints. Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2014, 9(4): 689-698. (in Chinese)
[6]    US EPA. Framework for application of the toxicity equivalence methodology for polychlorunated dioxins, furans and biphenyls in ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/P203/002A (External Review Draft), 2003.
[7]    Landis W G, Durda J L, Brooks M L, JAMES W. Ecological risk assessment in the context of global climate. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2013, 32(1): 79-92.
[8]    王小庆, 韦东普, 黄占斌, 马义兵. 物种敏感性分布在土壤中镍生态阈值建立中的应用研究. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(1): 92-98.
Wang X Q, Wei D P, Huang Z B, Ma Y B. Application of species sensitivity distribution in deriving of ecological threshould for nickel in soils. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012, 31(1): 92-98. (in Chinese)
[9]    宋文恩, 陈世宝. 基于水稻根伸长的不同土壤中镉(Cd)毒性阈值(ECx)及预测模型. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(17): 3434-3443.
Song W E, Chen S B. The toxicity thresholds (ECx) of cadmium (Cd) to rice cultivars as determined by root-elongation tests in soils and its predicted models. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(17): 3434-3443. (in Chinese)
[10]   Ding C, Zhang T, Wang X, Zhou F, Yang Y, Huang G. Prediction model for cadmium transfer from soil to carrot (Daucus carota L.) and its application to derive soil thresholds for food safety. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2013, 61(43): 10273-10282.
[11]   陈波宇, 郑斯瑞, 牛希成,赵劲松. 物种敏感度分布及其在生态毒理学中的应用. 生态毒理学报, 2010, 5(4): 491-497.
Chen B Y, Zheng S R, Niu X C, ZHAO J S. Species sensitivity distribution and its application in ecotoxicology. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2010, 5(4): 491-497. (in Chinese)
[12]   Yuan G L, Sun T H, Han P, LANG X X. Source identification and ecology risk assessment of heavy metals in topsoil using environmental geochenmical mapping: Typical urban renewal area in Beijing, China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 136(1): 40-47.
[13]   陈世宝, 林蕾, 魏威, 刘继芳, 马义兵. 基于不同测试终点的土壤锌毒性阈值及预测模型. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(5): 922-930.
Chen S B, Lin L, Wei W, Liu J F, Ma Y B. Comparative study of Zn-toxicity thresholds in 16 Chinese soils as determined by different bioassay endpoints and its predicted models. China Environmental Science, 2013, 33(5): 922-930. (in Chinese)
[14]   张小敏, 张秀英, 钟太洋, 江洪. 中国农田土壤重金属富集状况及其空间分布研究. 环境科学, 2014, 35(2): 692-703.
Zhang X M, Zhang X Y, Zhong T Y, Jiang H. Spatial distribution and accumulation of heavy metal in arable land soil of china. Environmental Science, 2014, 35(2): 692-703. (in Chinese)
[15]   郝汉舟, 靳孟贵, 李瑞敏, 王支农, 韩斌华. 耕地土壤铜、镉、锌形态及生物有效性研究. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(1): 92-96.
Hao H Z, Jin M G, Li R M, WANG Z N, HAN B H. Fractionations and bioavailability of Cu, Cd and Zn in cultivated land. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(1): 92-96. (in Chinese)
[16]   陈世宝, 孙聪, 魏威, 林蕾, 王萌. 根细胞壁及其组分差异对植物吸附、转运Zn的影响. 中国环境科学, 2012, 32(9): 1670-1676.
Chen S B, Sun C, Wei W, Lin L, Wang M. Difference in cell wall components of roots and its effect on the transfer factor of Zn by plant species. China Environmental Science, 2012, 32(9): 1670-1676. (in Chinese)
[17]   周庆, 欧晓昆, 张志明. 地下生态系统对生态恢复的影响. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(9): 1445-1453.
Zhou Q, Ou X K, Zhang Z M. Effects of belowground ecosystem on ecological restoration: A review. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007, 26(9): 1445-1453. (in Chinese)
[18]   鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999.
Lu R K. Agricultural Chemical Analysis of Soil. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1999. (in Chinese)
[19]   林蕾, 陈世宝, 刘继芳, 马义兵. 不同老化时间对土壤中外源Zn 的形态转化及生态毒性阈值(ECx) 的影响. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(7): 2025-2032.
Lin L, Chen S B, Liu J F, Ma Y B. Effects of aging time on the form transformation and ecotoxicity threshold (ECx) of added Zn in typical China soils. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(7): 2025-2032. (in Chinese)
[20]   雷炳莉, 黄圣彪, 王子健. 生态风险评价理论与方法. 化学进展, 2009, 21(2/3): 350-358.
Lei B L, Huang S B, Wang Z J. Theories and methods of ecological risk assessment. Progress in Chemistry, 2009, 21(2/3): 350-358. (in Chinese)
[21]   De Lange H J, Sala S, Vighi M, Faber J H. Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment-a review and perspectives. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408(18): 3871-3879.
[22]   Hawes M C, Gunawardena U, Miyasaka S, Zhao X W. The role of root border cells in plant defense. Trends in Plant Sciense, 2000, 5(3): 128-133.
[23]   王晓庆, 李菊梅, 韦东普. 土壤中铜和镍的不同毒性阈值间量化关系. 生态毒理学报, 2013, 8(6): 890-896.
Wang X Q, Li J M, Wei D P. The quantative relationship of different ecotoxicity thresholds for copper and nickel in soils. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2013, 8(6): 890-896. (in Chinese)
[24]   OECD. OECD Environment, Monographs 92, Guidance Document for Aquatic Effects Assessment. OECD publication service, Paris, France.
[25]   Smolders E, Oorts K, Van Sprang P, Schoeters I, Janssen C R, Mcgrath S P, Mclaughlin M J. Toxicity of trace metals in soil as affected by soil type and aging after contamination: Using calibrated bioavailability models to set ecological soil standards. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2009, 28(8): 1633-1642.
[26]   Coppolecchia D, Puglisi E, Vasileiadis S, TREVISAN M. Relative sensitivity of different soil biological properties to Zn. Soil Biology Biochemistry, 2011, 43(9): 1798-1807.
[27]   SHAHID M, DIMAT C, KHALID S, SCHRECK E. Foliar heavy metal uptake, toxicity and detoxification in plants: A comparison of foliar and root metal uptake. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 325:36-58.
[28]   Naidu R, Bolan N S. Contaminant chemistry in soils: Key concepts and bioavailability. Developments in Soil Science, 2008, 32(7): 9-37.
[1] XIAO LuTing,LI XiuHong,LIU LiJun,YE FaYin,ZHAO GuoHua. Effects of Starch Granule Size on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Barley Starches [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(5): 1010-1024.
[2] LI YaFei, SHI JiangLan, WU TianQi, WANG ShaoXia, LI YuNuo, QU ChunYan, LIU CongHui, NING Peng, TIAN XiaoHong. Effects of Combined Foliar Application of Zinc with Imidacloprid on Zinc Enrichment and Protein Components Content in Wheat Grain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(3): 514-528.
[3] WU TianQi,LI YaFei,SHI JiangLan,NING Peng,TIAN XiaoHong. Effects of Basal Nitrogen and Foliar Zinc Application at the Early Filling Stage on Zinc Enrichment and Protein Components Content in Wheat Grain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(10): 1971-1986.
[4] WANG YuLin,LEI Lin,XIONG WenWen,YE FaYin,ZHAO GuoHua. Effects of Steaming-Retrogradation Pretreatment on Physicochemical Properties and in Vitro Starch Digestibility of the Roasted Highland Barley Flour [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(19): 4207-4217.
[5] KaiYuan GONG,Liang HE,DingRong WU,ChangHe LÜ,Jun LI,WenBin ZHOU,Jun DU,Qiang YU. Spatial-Temporal Variations of Photo-Temperature Potential Productivity and Yield Gap of Highland Barley and Its Response to Climate Change in the Cold Regions of the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(4): 720-733.
[6] GONG Qiang,WANG Ke,YE XingGuo,DU LiPu,XU YanHao. Generation of Marker-Free Transgenic Barley Plants by Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(18): 3638-3649.
[7] JiRong LI,TangWei ZHANG,DeJi CIREN,XiaoJun YANG,Dun CI. Fractionation Effect of Stable Isotopic Ratios in Tsamba Processing [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(24): 4592-4602.
[8] BAI YiXiong, ZHENG XueQing, YAO YouHua, YAO XiaoHua, WU KunLun. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotypic Traits in Hulless Barley Germplasm Resources [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(23): 4201-4214.
[9] BAI YiXiong,YAO XiaoHua,YAO YouHua,WU KunLun. Difference of Traits Relating to Lodging Resistance in Hulless Barley Genotypes [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(2): 228-238.
[10] LI Jian, FENG XianHong, CAI YiLin. Coefficient of Parentage Analysis Among Naked Barley Varieties in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(16): 2758-2767.
[11] YiXuan LIU,DongLin HUANG,Na LIU,ZhiYuan YAO,Dan YIN,YuanYong MENG,HuBing ZHAO,YaYun GAO,ZhaoHui WANG. The Increasing Effect and Influencing Factors of Leguminous Green Manure on Wheat Grain Zn in Weibei Highland [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(21): 4030-4039.
[12] YANG Fei, ZHANG AiHong, MENG FanSi, HUO LiangZhan, LI XiWang, DI DianPing, MIAO HongQin. Distribution and Genetic Diversity of Barley yellow striate mosaic virus in Northern China [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(2): 279-289.
[13] HOU WeiHai, WANG JianLin, HU Dan, FENG XiBo. Effects of Drought in Post-Flowering on Leaf Water Potential, Photosynthetic Physiology, Seed Phenotype and Yield of Hulless Barley in Tibet Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(14): 2675-2688.
[14] WANG JianLin, ZHONG ZhiMing, FENG XiBo, FU Gang, HOU WeiHai, WANG GaiHua, Da-cizhuoga. Spatial Distribution Regulation of Protein Content of Naked Barley Varieties and Its Relationships with Environmental Factors in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(6): 969-977.
[15] YANG XiaoMeng, DU Juan, ZENG YaWen, PU XiaoYing, YANG ShuMing, YANG Tao, WANG LuXiang, YANG I JiaZhen. QTL Mapping of Protein and Related Functional Components Content in Barley Grains [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(2): 205-215.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!