垄作沟播对滨海盐碱土水盐变化及玉米生长的影响

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.20.017

中国农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (20): 4259-4271.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.20.017

所属专题：专刊——盐碱地智慧监测与生态化利用

垄作沟播对滨海盐碱土水盐变化及玉米生长的影响

陈坚¹(), 吴柳格¹, 张鑫¹, 邓艾兴¹, 宋振伟¹, 张卫建¹, 郑成岩¹^,²()

¹ 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/农业农村部作物生理生态重点实验室，北京 100081
² 国家盐碱地综合利用技术创新中心，山东东营 257347

收稿日期:2025-07-22 接受日期:2025-10-04 出版日期:2025-10-16 发布日期:2025-10-14
通信作者:
郑成岩，E-mail：zhengchengyan@caas.cn
联系方式: 陈坚，E-mail：18811739285@163.com。
基金资助:
中国农业科学院科技创新工程(CAAS-ZDRW202407); 中国农业科学院科技创新工程(01-ICS-20); 国家自然科学基金(32272218); 国家绿肥产业技术体系(CARS-22-G-16)

Effects of Ridge Tillage and Sowing in Furrow on Soil Water and Salt Dynamics and Maize Growth in Coastal Saline-Alkali Land

CHEN Jian¹(), WU LiuGe¹, ZHANG Xin¹, DENG AiXing¹, SONG ZhenWei¹, ZHANG WeiJian¹, ZHENG ChengYan¹^,²()

¹ Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081
² National Center of Technology Innovation for Comprehensive Utilization of Saline-Alkali Land, Dongying 257347, Shandong

Received:2025-07-22 Accepted:2025-10-04 Published:2025-10-16 Online:2025-10-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探究不同种植方式对土壤水盐变化及玉米产量的影响，为进一步挖掘滨海盐碱地产能提供理论依据。【方法】试验于2022—2023年在山东省东营滨海盐碱地进行，采用双因素裂区设计，主区为玉米品种：中试8626（V1）和中单8922（V2）；副区为种植方式：平作（P1）、垄作垄播（P2）和垄作沟播（P3），研究种植方式对土壤水盐变化及玉米产量的影响机制。【结果】与P1相比，P3处理的玉米苗期0—40 cm土层含水量增加4.6%，盐分含量降低10.3%；而P2处理的0—40 cm土层含水量降低4.8%，盐分含量升高11.8%。P3处理可以显著提高苗期表层土壤含水量，降低盐分含量，从而提高玉米出苗率，其出苗率比P1处理提高2.9%。与P1相比，P3处理的吐丝期根系干重、根长、根表面积和根体积分别提高18.5%、21.1%、23.1%和26.8%；P3处理的玉米成熟期干物质积累量、有效穗数和穗粒数比P1处理分别增加10.2%、3.1%和4.0%。品种间，V1的出苗率比V2平均提高了5.2%；与V1相比，V2吐丝期的根系干重、根长、根表面积和根体积分别提高26.9%、13.8%、7.1%和26.0%；V2成熟期的干物质积累量和百粒重比V1分别增加7.0%和3.8%，而V1的有效穗数和穗粒数比V2增加5.2%和12.4%。与P1和P2处理相比，P3处理下V1玉米品种的籽粒产量分别提高9.1%和27.1%，V2玉米品种的籽粒产量分别提高10.7%和19.0%。【结论】在本试验条件下，垄作沟播种植能改善土壤的水盐分布，有利于提高中试8626出苗率、穗粒数、收获指数和籽粒产量。

关键词: 盐碱地, 种植方式, 玉米, 水盐动态, 产量

Abstract:

【Objective】Studying the effects of different planting patterns on soil water-salt dynamics and maize yield could provide a theoretical basis for further enhancing the productivity of coastal saline-alkali lands. 【Method】 The experiment was conducted from 2022 to 2023 in the coastal saline-alkali soil of Dongying City, Shandong Province, using a split-plot design with two factors. The main plots consisted of two maize varieties: Zhongshi 8626 (V1) and Zhongdan 8922 (V2), while the subplots included three planting patterns: flat tillage (P1), ridge tillage and sowing on the ridge (P2), and ridge tillage and sowing in the furrow (P3). The study investigated the mechanisms by which ridge tillage and sowing in the furrow affects soil water-salt dynamics and maize yield. 【Result】 Compared with P1, P3 treatment increased soil water content in the 0-40 cm layer by 4.6% and reduced soil salt content by 10.3%, whereas P2 decreased water content by 4.8% and increased soil salt content by 11.8% during the maize seedling stage. The seedling emergence rate under P3 was 2.9% higher than that under P1. Ridge tillage and sowing in the furrow significantly improved topsoil water retention and reduced salinity, thereby enhancing maize emergence. At the silking stage, P3 increased root dry weight, root length, root surface area, and root volume by 18.5%, 21.1%, 23.1%, and 26.8%, respectively, compared with P1. At maturity stage, P3 increased dry matter accumulation, ear number, and kernels per spike by 10.2%, 3.1%, and 4.0%, respectively, compared with P1. The emergence rate of maize in V1 was 5.2% higher than that in V2. Compared with V1, V2 increased root dry weight, root length, root surface area, and root volume at the silking stage by 26.9%, 13.8%, 7.1%, and 26.0%, respectively. At maturity stage, V2 increased dry matter accumulation and 100-grain weight by 7.0% and 3.8%, respectively, compared with P1. However, V1 had 5.2% more ear numbers and 12.4% more kernels per spike than V2. In comparison with P1 and P2, P3 increased yield of V1 by 9.1% and 27.1%, respectively, while P3 increased yield of V2 by 10.7% and 19.0%, respectively. 【Conclusion】 Under the experimental conditions, the maize variety Zhongshi 8626 was selected and planted with ridge tillage and sowing in the furrow. This approach optimized soil water-salt dynamics, which contributed to higher seedling emergence rates, increased kernels per spike, enhanced harvest index, and improved grain yield.

Key words: saline-alkali land, planting, maize, water and salt dynamics, yield

陈坚, 吴柳格, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 张卫建, 郑成岩. 垄作沟播对滨海盐碱土水盐变化及玉米生长的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(20): 4259-4271.

CHEN Jian, WU LiuGe, ZHANG Xin, DENG AiXing, SONG ZhenWei, ZHANG WeiJian, ZHENG ChengYan. Effects of Ridge Tillage and Sowing in Furrow on Soil Water and Salt Dynamics and Maize Growth in Coastal Saline-Alkali Land[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(20): 4259-4271.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 48

[1]	杨劲松. 中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 837-845.
	YANG J S. Development and prospect of the research on salt-affected soils in China. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5): 837-845. (in Chinese)
[2]	LEI S H, JIA X X, ZHAO C L, SHAO M G. A review of saline-alkali soil improvements in China: Efforts and their impacts on soil properties. Agricultural Water Management, 2025, 317: 109617.
[3]	孙佳, 夏江宝, 苏丽, 赵西梅, 陈印平, 岳喜元, 李传荣. 黄河三角洲盐碱地不同植被模式的土壤改良效应. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4): 1323-1332. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202004.032
	SUN J, XIA J B, SU L, ZHAO X M, CHEN Y P, YUE X Y, LI C R. Soil amelioration of different vegetation types in saline-alkali land of the Yellow River Delta, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(4): 1323-1332. (in Chinese)
[4]	赵耕毛, 杨梦圆, 陈硕, 苏纪康, 吕慧琳, 贾慧昕, 刘兆普. 我国盐碱地治理: 现状、问题与展望. 南京农业大学学报, 2025, 48(1): 14-26.
	ZHAO G M, YANG M Y, CHEN S, SU J K, LÜ H L, JIA H X, LIU Z P. Saline-alkali land management in China: Current situation, problems and prospects. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2025, 48(1): 14-26. (in Chinese)
[5]	YAO R J, GAO Q C, LIU Y X, LI H Q, YANG J S, BAI Y C, ZHU H, WANG X P, XIE W P, ZHANG X. Deep vertical rotary tillage mitigates salinization hazards and shifts microbial community structure in salt-affected anthropogenic-alluvial soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 2023, 227: 105627.
[6]	SONG J S, ZHANG H Y, CHANG F D, YU R, WANG J, CHEN A P, XU Y, LIU Y, ZHOU J, LI Y Y. Subsurface organic amendment of a saline soil increases ecosystem multifunctionality and sunflower yield. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 917: 170276.
[7]	王国丽, 常芳弟, 张宏媛, 卢闯, 宋佳珅, 王婧, 逄焕成, 李玉义. 不同厚度秸秆隔层对河套灌区盐碱土壤温度、水分和食葵产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(19): 4155-4168. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.19.011.
	WANG G L, CHANG F D, ZHANG H Y, LU C, SONG J S, WANG J, PANG H C, LI Y Y. Effects of straw interlayer with different thickness on saline-alkali soil temperature, water content, and sunflower yield in Hetao irrigation area. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(19): 4155-4168. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.19.011. (in Chinese)
[8]	CONG P, SONG J S, DONG J X, SU W Y, FENG W H, ZHANG H Y. Straw return was more beneficial to improving saline soil quality and crop productivity than biochar in the short term. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15: 1517917.
[9]	LI W D, WANG H J, ZHONG M T, SONG J H, SHI X Y, TIAN T, WANG J G, ZHU Y Q, JIANG M H. Effects of straw return and biochar application on soil nutrients and osmotic regulation in cotton under different soil salinity levels. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2023, 21(2): 957-974.
[10]	梁玉刚, 胡文彬, 刘烨, 李咏谊, 方宝华. 中国垄作栽培模式的研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(7): 1414-1422.
	LIANG Y G, HU W B, LIU Y, LI Y Y, FANG B H. The research progress of ridge cultivation mode in China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022, 41(7): 1414-1422. (in Chinese) doi: DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202207.024
[11]	刘佩, 刘小利, 王金金, 蔡铁, 张鹏, 任小龙, 贾志宽, 陈小莉. 集雨种植模式对小麦-玉米周年农田土壤水分及作物产量的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2019, 38(6): 37-43.
	LIU P, LIU X L, WANG J J, CAI T, ZHANG P, REN X L, JIA Z K, CHEN X L. Soil moisture dynamic and crop production of a rainfed wheat-summer maize rotation system. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2019, 38(6): 37-43. (in Chinese)
[12]	邓欢, 戴飞, 史瑞杰, 王锋, 宋学锋, 赵武云. 基于HYDRUS-2D/3D的玉米全膜双垄沟水肥运移规律与根系响应. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(S2): 100-108.
	DENG H, DAI F, SHI R J, WANG F, SONG X F, ZHAO W Y. Water and fertilizer transport law and root response of maize in full-film double ridges and furrows based on HYDRUS-2D/3D. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2022, 53(S2): 100-108. (in Chinese)
[13]	ZHANG G X, DAI R C, MA W Z, FAN H Z, MENG W H, HAN J, LIAO Y C. Optimizing the ridge-furrow ratio and nitrogen application rate can increase the grain yield and water use efficiency of rain-fed spring maize in the Loess Plateau region of China. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 262: 107430.
[14]	韩同超. 汉代华北的耕作与环境: 关于三杨庄遗址内农田垄作的探讨. 中国历史地理论丛, 2010, 25(1): 40-49.
	HAN T C. The relationship between cultivation and environment of North China during Han period: Research on ridge culture in Sanyangzhuang Village site. Journal of Chinese Historical Geography, 2010, 25(1): 40-49. (in Chinese)
[15]	DEVKOTA M, MARTIUS C, GUPTA R K, DEVKOTA K P, MCDONALD A J, LAMERS J P A. Managing soil salinity with permanent bed planting in irrigated production systems in Central Asia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2015, 202: 90-97.
[16]	BAKKER D M, HAMILTON G J, HETHERINGTON R, SPANN C. Productivity of waterlogged and salt-affected land in a Mediterranean climate using bed-furrow systems. Field Crops Research, 2010, 117(1): 24-37.
[17]	ZHANG Y J, XU S Z, LIU G Y, LIAN T X, LI Z H, LIANG T T, ZHANG D M, CUI Z P, ZHAN L J, SUN L, et al. Ridge intertillage alters rhizosphere bacterial communities and plant physiology to reduce yield loss of waterlogged cotton. Field Crops Research, 2023, 293: 108849.
[18]	REN B Z, DONG S T, LIU P, ZHAO B, ZHANG J W. Ridge tillage improves plant growth and grain yield of waterlogged summer maize. Agricultural Water Management, 2016, 177: 392-399.
[19]	张登奎, 王琦, 周旭姣, 王小赟, 赵晓乐, 赵武成, 雷俊. 生物炭覆盖垄沟集雨种植对集雨垄径流、土壤水热和红豆草产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(2): 272-285.
	ZHANG D K, WANG Q, ZHOU X J, WANG X Y, ZHAO X L, ZHAO W C, LEI J. Effects of ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting with biochar-soil crust mulching on ridge runoff, soil hydrothermal properties, and sainfoin yield. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(2): 272-285. (in Chinese)
[20]	谢军, 尹学伟, 魏灵, 王子芳, 李清虎, 张晓春, 鲁远源, 王秋月, 高明. 垄作直播控制灌溉对水稻产量和温室气体排放的影响. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(4): 697-710. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.04.009.
	XIE J, YIN X W, WEI L, WANG Z F, LI Q H, ZHANG X C, LU Y Y, WANG Q Y, GAO M. Effects of control irrigation on grain yield and greenhouse gas emissions in ridge cultivation direct-seeding paddy field. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(4): 697-710. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.04.009. (in Chinese)
[21]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. (in Chinese)
[22]	FANG X, LIU Z, LI J, LAI J B, GONG H R, SUN Z G, OUYANG Z, DOU W J, FA K Y. Non-synergistic changes in migration processes between soil salt and water in the salt patch of the coastal saline soil. Agronomy, 2023, 13(9): 2403.
[23]	高英波, 陶洪斌, 朱金城, 黄收兵, 徐彩龙, 盛耀辉, 王璞. 麦茬高度对机播夏玉米苗期生长及水分利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(19): 3803-3810. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.19.003.
	GAO Y B, TAO H B, ZHU J C, HUANG S B, XU C L, SHENG Y H, WANG P. Effects of wheat stubble height on growth and water use efficiency of mechanized sowing summer maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(19): 3803-3810. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.19.003. (in Chinese)
[24]	任昊, 程乙, 刘鹏, 董树亭, 赵杰, 张吉旺, 赵斌. 不同栽培模式对夏玉米根系性能及产量和氮素利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(12): 2270-2281. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.12.008.
	REN H, CHENG Y, LIU P, DONG S T, ZHAO J, ZHANG J W, ZHAO B. Effects of different cultivation patterns on root characteristics, yield formation and nitrogen utilization of summer maize. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(12): 2270-2281. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.12.008. (in Chinese)
[25]	吴希, 王家瑞, 郝淼艺, 张宏军, 张仁和. 种植密度对不同生育期玉米品种光温资源利用率和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1065-1078. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23032
	WU X, WANG J R, HAO M Y, ZHANG H J, ZHANG R H. Effects of planting density on solar and heat resource utilization and yield of maize varieties at different growth stages. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(4): 1065-1078. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23032
[26]	HASSANI A, AZAPAGIC A, SHOKRI N. Global predictions of primary soil salinization under changing climate in the 21st century. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 6663. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26907-3 pmid: 34795219
[27]	KE Z M, LIU X L, MA L H, JIAO F, WANG Z L. Spatial distribution of soil water and salt in a slightly salinized farmland. Sustainability, 2023, 15(8): 6872.
[28]	王琳琳, 李素艳, 孙向阳, 张涛, 付颖, 张红蕾. 不同隔盐措施对滨海盐碱地土壤水盐运移及刺槐光合特性的影响. 生态学报, 2015, 35(5): 1388-1398.
	WANG L L, LI S Y, SUN X Y, ZHANG T, FU Y, ZHANG H L. Application of salt-isolation materials to a coastal region: Effects on soil water and salt movement and photosynthetic characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(5): 1388-1398. (in Chinese)
[29]	ZHANG G X, MO F, SHAH F, MENG W H, LIAO Y C, HAN J. Ridge-furrow configuration significantly improves soil water availability, crop water use efficiency, and grain yield in dryland agroecosystems of the Loess Plateau. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 245: 106657.
[30]	李玉玲, 张鹏, 张艳, 贾倩民, 刘东华, 董昭芸, 贾志宽, 韩清芳, 任小龙. 旱区集雨种植方式对土壤水分、温度的时空变化及春玉米产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(6): 1084-1096. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.06.005.
	LI Y L, ZHANG P, ZHANG Y, JIA Q M, LIU D H, DONG Z Y, JIA Z K, HAN Q F, REN X L. Effects of rainfall harvesting planting on temporal and spatial changing of soil water and temperature, and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) in semi-arid areas. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(6): 1084-1096. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.06.005. (in Chinese)
[31]	CHEN G Z, WU P, WANG J Y, ZHANG P, JIA Z K. Ridge-furrow rainfall harvesting system helps to improve stability, benefits and precipitation utilization efficiency of maize production in Loess Plateau region of China. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 261: 107360.
[32]	关法春, 苗彦军, Tianfang Bernie Fang, 兰小中, 梁正伟. 起垄措施对重度盐碱化草地土壤水盐和植被状况的影响. 草地学报, 2010, 18(6): 763-767. doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.06.003
	GUAN F C, MIAO Y J, FANG T B, LAN X Z, LIANG Z W. Effects of ridging on soil and above-ground biomass in heavy alkali-saline grasslands of west Songnen Plain, China. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(6): 763-767. (in Chinese)
[33]	苏丽, 葛磊, 夏江宝, 孙佳, 赵西梅. 黄河三角洲滨海滩涂不同微地形改造的盐地碱蓬恢复效应评价. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(10): 82-90.
	SU L, GE L, XIA J B, SUN J, ZHAO X M. Evaluating Suaeda salsa restoration after micro-topography reconstruction in the coastal beach of the Yellow River Delta, China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(10): 82-90. (in Chinese)
[34]	张静, 王洪章, 任昊, 殷复伟, 吴红燕, 赵斌, 张吉旺, 任佰朝, 戴爱斌, 刘鹏. 夏玉米根系构型与抗根倒性能间的关系. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 188-199. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23004
	ZHANG J, WANG H Z, REN H, YIN F W, WU H Y, ZHAO B, ZHANG J W, REN B Z, DAI A B, LIU P. Relationship between root architecture and root pulling force of summer maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(1): 188-199. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23004
[35]	DEINLEIN U, STEPHAN A B, HORIE T, LUO W, XU G H, SCHROEDER J I. Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms. Trends in Plant Science, 2014, 19(6): 371-379. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.02.001 pmid: 24630845
[36]	SONG J S, ZHANG H Y, KUMAR A, CHANG F D, YU R, ZHANG X Q, WANG J, WANG W N, LIU J M, ZHOU J, LI Y Y. Combined organic ameliorants is benefits for improving ecosystem multi- functionality in saline soils. Industrial Crops and Products, 2025, 230: 121068.
[37]	张贵芹, 王洪章, 郭新送, 朱福军, 高涵, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 任昊. 有机物料投入对滨海盐碱地土壤理化性状和夏玉米产量形成的影响. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2323-2334. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.43002
	ZHANG G Q, WANG H Z, GUO X S, ZHU F J, GAO H, ZHANG J W, ZHAO B, REN B Z, LIU P, REN H. Effects of organic material inputs on soil physicochemical properties and summer maize yield formation in coastal saline-alkali land. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(9): 2323-2334. (in Chinese)
[38]	白小龙, 武晋民, 张家豪, 王腾, 杨正虎, 田丰, 赵卉, 王彬. 不同改良物料及其配施组合对河套平原盐碱土壤玉米光合与根系形态特征的影响. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(10): 3023-3030.
	BAI X L, WU J M, ZHANG J H, WANG T, YANG Z H, TIAN F, ZHAO H, WANG B. Effects of different modified materials and their combinations on photosynthesis and root morphological characteristics of maize in saline-alkali soil of Hetao Plain. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2024, 43(10): 3023-3030. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202410.015
[39]	杨明达, 关小康, 刘影, 崔静宇, 丁超明, 王静丽, 韩静丽, 王怀苹, 康海平, 王同朝. 滴灌模式和水分调控对夏玉米干物质和氮素积累与分配及水分利用的影响. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 443-459. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83026
	YANG M D, GUAN X K, LIU Y, CUI J Y, DING C M, WANG J L, HAN J L, WANG H P, KANG H P, WANG T C. Effects of drip irrigation pattern and water regulation on the accumulation and allocation of dry matter and nitrogen, and water use efficiency in summer maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(3): 443-459. (in Chinese)
[40]	LI Y Y, MING B, FAN P P, LIU Y, WANG K R, HOU P, XUE J, LI S K, XIE R Z. Quantifying contributions of leaf area and longevity to leaf area duration under increased planting density and nitrogen input regimens during maize yield improvement. Field Crops Research, 2022, 283: 108551.
[41]	王本龙, 周春生, 李利荣, 胡佩雷, 海珍. 耕作方式与灌溉定额对苏打盐碱土理化性质和玉米生长的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2025. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspxfilename=NJNY20250519002&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ.
	WANG B L, ZHOU C S, LI L R, HU P L, HAI Z. Effect of tillage practices and irrigation quotas on physico-chemical properties and maize growth in soda saline soils. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2025. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspxfilename=NJNY20250519002&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ. (in Chinese)
[42]	韩笑晨, 张贵芹, 王亚辉, 任昊, 王洪章, 刘国利, 林佃旭, 王子强, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏. 土壤调理剂对滨海盐碱地土壤盐分含量及夏玉米产量的影响. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1776-1786. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2024.33069
	HAN X C, ZHANG G Q, WANG Y H, REN H, WANG H Z, LIU G L, LIN D X, WANG Z Q, ZHANG J W, ZHAO B, REN B C, LIU P. Effects of soil conditioners on soil salinity content and maize yield in coastal saline-alkali land. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(7): 1776-1786. (in Chinese)
[43]	邝雨欣, 张体彬, 程煜, 高伟强, 梁青, 童建康, 冯浩, 郁明军. 有机无机肥配施对盐渍化农田无机态氮迁移和玉米生长的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2025, 43(2): 105-115, 137.
	KUANG Y X, ZHANG T B, CHENG Y, GAO W Q, LIANG Q, TONG J K, FENG H, YU M J. Effects of combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on inorganic nitrogen movement and maize growth in salinity soils. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2025, 43(2): 105-115, 137. (in Chinese)
[44]	寇江涛, 师尚礼, 蔡卓山. 垄沟集雨种植对旱作紫花苜蓿生长特性及品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(24): 5028-5036. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.24.006.
	KOU J T, SHI S L, CAI Z S. Effects of ridge and furrow rainfall harvesting on growth characteristics and quality of Medicago sativa in dryland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(24): 5028-5036. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.24.006. (in Chinese)
[45]	周浩露, 申朝阳, 罗新宇, 黄英惠, 王可心, 王云浩, 高小丽. 氮肥对垄沟集雨种植谷子氮素利用效率及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(5): 885-899. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.05.005.
	ZHOU H L, SHEN Z Y, LUO X Y, HUANG Y H, WANG K X, WANG Y H, GAO X L. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen use efficiency and yield of foxtail millet in ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting planting model. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2024, 57(5): 885-899. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2024.05.005. (in Chinese)
[46]	ZHANG G X, ZHANG Y, LIU S J, ZHAO D H, WEN X X, HAN J, LIAO Y C. Optimizing nitrogen fertilizer application to improve nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield of rainfed spring maize under ridge-furrow plastic film mulching planting. Soil and Tillage Research, 2023, 229: 105680.
[47]	LIU G Z, YANG Y S, GUO X X, LIU W M, XIE R Z, MING B, XUE J, WANG K R, LI S K, HOU P. A global analysis of dry matter accumulation and allocation for maize yield breakthrough from 1.0 to 25.0 Mg·ha^-1. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2023, 188: 106656.
[48]	徐田军, 吕天放, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 蔡万涛, 刘月娥, 邢锦丰, 成广雷, 张春原, 张勇, 刘秀芝. 青贮玉米适收期淀粉、干物质含量和果穗鲜质量占比关系研究. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(S1): 167-175. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191264
	XU T J, LÜ T F, ZHAO J R, WANG R H, CAI W T, LIU Y E, XING J F, CHENG G L, ZHANG C Y, ZHANG Y, LIU X Z. Study on the relationship between the content of starch and dry matter, the ratio of fresh weight of ear in silage maize. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2020, 35(S1): 167-175. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191264

年份 Year	品种 Variety	种植方式 Planting pattern	拔节期 V6	吐丝期 R1	灌浆期 R3	成熟期 R6
2022	V1	P1	0.70±0.01c	4.15±0.06c	3.79±0.02d	2.26±0.07c
		P2	0.62±0.01d	4.03±0.03c	3.64±0.08d	2.11±0.06d
		P3	0.75±0.03c	4.34±0.09b	3.96±0.04c	2.39±0.04c
	V2	P1	0.88±0.03ab	4.52±0.06ab	4.26±0.03ab	2.80±0.04b
		P2	0.84±0.02b	4.43±0.05b	4.18±0.07b	2.65±0.11b
		P3	0.94±0.03a	4.63±0.06a	4.39±0.03a	3.03±0.09a
	V		*	*	*	**
	P		**	**	**	**
	V×P		ns	ns	ns	ns
2023	V1	P1	0.69±0.01b	4.60±0.07d	4.23±0.05d	2.12±0.06de
		P2	0.59±0.03c	4.35±0.04e	4.06±0.08d	2.06±0.04e
		P3	0.74±0.06b	5.19±0.01b	4.79±0.10bc	2.40±0.07c
	V2	P1	0.84±0.02a	5.05±0.04b	4.94±0.09b	2.44±0.06b
		P2	0.85±0.02a	4.84±0.05c	4.63±0.04c	2.27±0.07cd
		P3	0.93±0.03a	5.42±0.11a	5.19±0.07a	2.81±0.09a
	V		*	*	*	*
	P		*	**	**	**
	V×P		ns	ns	*	ns

年份 Year	品种 Variety	种植方式 Planting pattern	干物质积累量 Dry matter accumulation (×10³kg·hm^-2)
年份 Year	品种 Variety	种植方式 Planting pattern	拔节期 V6	吐丝期 R1	灌浆期 R3	成熟期 R6
2022	V1	P1	2.48±0.16a	9.52±0.36cd	14.18±0.63bc	18.03±0.48c
		P2	1.97±0.12b	8.90±0.36d	13.81±0.58c	16.21±0.28d
		P3	2.50±0.05a	10.89±0.51abc	16.06±0.6ab	19.72±0.29ab
	V2	P1	2.41±0.01a	11.79±0.84ab	15.01±0.79abc	19.94±0.11a
		P2	2.39±0.22a	10.32±0.35bcd	14.23±0.67bc	18.60±0.43c
		P3	2.60±0.12a	12.60±0.76a	16.63±0.51a	20.82±0.50a
	V		ns	*	ns	*
	P		ns	*	*	**
	V×P		ns	ns	ns	ns
2023	V1	P1	2.19±0.08b	11.70±0.10bc	15.06±0.3cd	20.67±0.66c
		P2	2.18±0.00b	10.50±0.11c	14.20±0.31d	18.66±0.36d
		P3	2.55±0.10ab	12.21±0.40b	17.50±0.40ab	22.44±0.38ab
	V2	P1	2.39±0.08ab	11.43±0.23bc	16.37±0.87bc	20.06±0.45cd
		P2	2.36±0.13ab	11.70±0.87bc	17.34±0.22ab	21.05±0.51bc
		P3	2.74±0.22a	13.59±0.20a	18.49±0.33a	23.15±0.19a
	V		ns	ns	*	*
	P		*	**	**	**
	V×P		ns	ns	ns	ns

年份 Year	品种 Variety	种植方式 Planting pattern	产量 Yield (kg·hm^-2)	有效穗数 Ear number (×10⁴·hm^-2)	穗粒数 Kernels per spike	百粒重 100-grain weight (g)	收获指数 Harvest index (%)
2022	V1	P1	8523.84±314.58a	6.07±0.22ab	477.2±10.74b	30.54±0.54ab	47.44±1.70a
		P2	7443.65±402.31b	5.72±0.11bc	469.3±0.66b	29.14±0.35b	45.95±1.48a
		P3	9433.15±276.45a	6.20±0.06a	506.9±17.32a	30.50±0.89ab	47.87±1.07a
	V2	P1	7105.27±175.39b	5.43±0.12c	417.1±5.39cd	31.14±0.69a	35.63±0.54b
		P2	6883.08±99.91b	5.38±0.13c	396.2±11.76d	31.98±0.53a	37.08±0.83b
		P3	7549.12±194.23b	5.76±0.05bc	429.7±7.18c	32.39±0.41a	36.32±0.88b
	V		*	*	*	*	*
	P		**	*	*	ns	ns
	V×P		*	ns	ns	ns	ns
2023	V1	P1	9090.65±98.66b	6.78±0.02a	469.1±7.82a	31.75±0.86cd	44.07±0.67a
		P2	7680.50±110.33c	6.63±0.02b	438.3±7.7b	30.73±0.52d	41.18±0.45a
		P3	9786.60±162.08a	6.85±0.02a	481.8±4.12a	31.89±0.67cd	43.66±0.81ab
	V2	P1	7972.48±40.01c	6.58±0.01bc	434.1±3.87b	33.98±0.25ab	37.92±0.58ab
		P2	7140.36±234.00d	6.52±0.06c	422.0±7.07b	33.01±0.49bc	35.72±1.18b
		P3	9138.38±74.56b	6.78±0.02a	441.1±5.79b	34.90±0.16a	39.48±0.31b
	V		*	*	*	*	*
	P		**	**	**	ns	ns
	V×P		ns	ns	ns	ns	ns

垄作沟播对滨海盐碱土水盐变化及玉米生长的影响

Effects of Ridge Tillage and Sowing in Furrow on Soil Water and Salt Dynamics and Maize Growth in Coastal Saline-Alkali Land

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 48

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	彭廷燊, 陆久焱, 吴美林, 严雨欣, 刘宏周, 南文斌, 秦小健, 李明, 龚俊义, 梁永书. 多年生水稻黄糯2号和长白7号产量相关性状的QTL分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379.
[2]	王亚菲, 闫鹏, 薛金涛, 董学瑞, 孟凡琦, 郭丽娜, 罗艺, 张娟, 董志强, 卢霖. 乙烯利-甜菜碱-水杨酸合剂对高温胁迫下玉米根系建构、生理功能和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1439-1455.
[3]	王玉萍, 符质, 孙佳莹, 穆晓萌, 刘慧淋, 郭进云, 宋文菁, 侯雷平, 赵海亮. 苗期施用褪黑素对番茄短期低温胁迫的缓解作用与应用效果评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535.
[4]	王佳诺, 陈桂平, 李盼, 王丽萍, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文, 赵连豪. 免耕地膜两年覆盖提高绿洲灌区玉米产量的灌浆期光合生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202.
[5]	周新杰, 任昊, 陈应龙, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 过氧化钙对渍涝农田夏玉米根系形态及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216.
[6]	何继航, 张擎, 吕相月, 薛吉全, 徐淑兔, 刘建超. 不同保绿型玉米杂交种氮效率评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230.
[7]	李永娟, 张悦彤, 王艺博, 赵长江, 宋洁, 陈雪丽, 姚钦. 生物炭施用对大豆轮连作系统土壤固氮微生物nifH基因丰度及群落组成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1272-1285.
[8]	李思源, 李鸿萍, 常洪庆, 张森焱, 栗思佳, 崔欣飞, 乔泼, 曾波, 刘桂珍, 刘天学, 汤继华, 李潮海. 增密对不同株高玉米品种产量和农艺性状动态变化的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 967-984.
[9]	董金龙, 赵莹, 余海兵, 吕建晔, 秦佳琦, 梁晨, 明博, 李少昆. 多模型解析玉米籽粒容重的营养品质贡献度与区域异质性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 985-995.
[10]	郝琨, 陈洪德, 张威, 钟韵, 党美荣, 朱士江, 黄志坤, 金英. 基于柑橘产量、品质及水氮利用的涌泉根灌水氮综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 862-873.
[11]	郭富城, 唐海江, 郝馨怡, 马国林, 杨九菊, 黄霖锋, 田蕾, 王彬, 罗成科. 不同灌溉方式对宁夏盐渍化土壤水盐运移、水稻产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 750-764.
[12]	延廷霖, 杜娅丹, 胡笑涛, 王贺, 李晓雁, 王玉明, 牛文全, 谷晓博. 加气滴灌下氮肥有机替代对亏缺灌溉棉花产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(3): 602-618.
[13]	陈桂平, 韦金贵, 郭瑶, 李盼, 王菲儿, 仇海龙, 冯福学, 殷文. 宽窄行与增密对绿洲灌区玉米光合特性及资源利用的协同效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 278-291.
[14]	蔡廷阳, 朱玉鹏, 李瑞东, 吴宗声, 徐一帆, 宋雯雯, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥. 苗期叶损伤对黄淮海夏大豆光合特性、荚果分布及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 292-304.
[15]	张志勇, 谭世超, 熊淑萍, 马新明, 韦一昊, 王小纯. 水氮周年优化对豫北灌区小麦玉米轮作系统产量和氮迁移的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(2): 336-353.