中国农业科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 292-304.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2026.02.006

• 耕作栽培·生理生化·农业信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

苗期叶损伤对黄淮海夏大豆光合特性、荚果分布及产量形成的影响

蔡廷阳, 朱玉鹏, 李瑞东, 吴宗声, 徐一帆, 宋雯雯, 徐彩龙(), 吴存祥()   

  1. 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所/国家大豆产业技术研发中心/农业农村部作物生理生态重点实验室, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-22 接受日期:2025-12-18 出版日期:2026-01-16 发布日期:2026-01-22
  • 通信作者:
    吴存祥,E-mail:
    徐彩龙,E-mail:
  • 联系方式: 蔡廷阳,E-mail:13287546075@163.com。朱玉鹏,E-mail:zhuyupeng@caas.cn。蔡廷阳和朱玉鹏为同等贡献作者。
  • 基金资助:
    国家大豆产业技术体系专项(CARS-04); 中国农业科学院科技创新工程

Effects of Leaf-Cutting at Seedling Stage on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Pod Distribution and Yield Formation in Soybean in the Huang-Huai-Hai Region

CAI TingYang, ZHU YuPeng, LI RuiDong, WU ZongSheng, XU YiFan, SONG WenWen, XU CaiLong(), WU CunXiang()   

  1. Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Soybean Industrial Technology Research and Development Center/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology and Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2025-06-22 Accepted:2025-12-18 Published:2026-01-16 Online:2026-01-22

摘要:

【目的】 黄淮海地区为我国夏大豆主产区之一,黄淮海地区夏季多风雨、冰雹等天气导致苗期大豆叶片遭受损害,致使叶面积下降。通过人工剪叶方法,研究苗期去叶后大豆光合特性、荚果分布及产量形成的变化,旨在为大豆抗逆高产栽培技术集成应用提供支撑。【方法】 以中黄301为试验材料,通过2年田间试验于大豆V3期设置不同剪叶处理:CK(不剪叶)、C1(剪去1片三出复叶)、C2(剪去2片三出复叶)、C3(剪去3片三出复叶),模仿大豆幼苗因恶劣天气造成的叶面积下降现象,系统解析苗期去叶对大豆产量及生理特性的影响。【结果】 苗期去叶降低了大豆产量,且损失程度与剪叶强度呈正相关关系,C1、C2和C3处理2年平均分别减产5.4%、10.2%和19.3%,主要归因于底荚高度较CK处理分别提升了7.09%、24.5%和42%,植株下层(0-30 cm)荚果数量分别下降13.6%、33.8%和59.6%。叶面积指数随剪叶量的增加而下降,导致地上部干物质积累减少,R1、R3期C1、C2和C3处理较CK处理分别平均下降8.5%、16.5%和37.1%,R8期C1、C2和C3处理籽粒干重较CK分别下降12.1%、24.3%与32.7%。光合特性分析显示,C1和C2处理在各生育时期的各项光合指标与CK处理无显著差异;然而,C3处理在R1期显著抑制了净光合速率、相对叶绿素含量及光系统Ⅱ活性,但其光合能力在R3期得以恢复。氮素代谢研究表明,剪叶处理降低大豆地上部总氮积累量,生殖生长后期籽粒氮素占比虽达93.6%,但源器官氮供应不足导致库容受限,成熟期最高蛋白质含量处理与最低蛋白质含量处理间仅差1.27%。主成分分析表明,大豆产量与LAI、光合速率、氮素积累及下层荚果数呈正相关关系,与底荚高度呈负相关关系。【结论】 苗期去叶对夏大豆产量具有显著负面效应,且减产幅度随去叶强度的增加而加剧。叶面积指数、光合性能、氮素积累量及基部荚果数是表征叶片损伤程度的关键敏感指标;明确上述指标的响应规律,可为制定大豆抗逆栽培策略提供科学依据。

关键词: 苗期剪叶, 产量形成, 光合特性, 源-库平衡, 氮素代谢, 大豆

Abstract:

【Objective】 The Huang-Huai-Hai region is a major production area for summer soybeans (Glycine max L.) in China. In this region, frequent wind, rain, and hail during the summer often cause damage to leave at the seedling stage, resulting in a reduction in leaf area. By using artificial defoliation, this study investigated the changes in photosynthetic characteristics, pod distribution, and yield formation of soybeans following leaf removal at the seedling stage, so as to provide support for the integrated application of stress-resistant and high-yield soybean cultivation techniques. 【Method】 Using 'Zhonghuang 301' as the experimental material, a two-year field experiment was conducted. Different defoliation treatments were established at the soybean V3 stage: CK (no defoliation), C1 (removal of 1 trifoliolate leaf), C2 (removal of 2 trifoliolate leaves), and C3 (removal of 3 trifoliolate leaves). These treatments simulated the reduction in leaf area caused by adverse weather conditions in seedlings to systematically analyze the effects of seedling defoliation on soybean yield and physiological characteristics. 【Result】 Defoliation at the seedling stage reduced soybean yield, and the degree of yield loss was positively correlated with defoliation intensity. The C1, C2, and C3 treatments resulted in average yield reductions of 5.4%, 10.2%, and 19.3% over two years, respectively. This was primarily attributed to an increase in the height of the lowest pod (which increased by 7.09%, 24.5%, and 42% compared with CK, respectively) and a decrease in the number of pods in the lower layer (0-30 cm) of the plant (which decreased by 13.6%, 33.8%, and 59.6%, respectively). The Leaf Area Index (LAI) decreased with increasing defoliation, leading to reduced aboveground dry matter accumulation; compared with CK, the accumulation under C1, C2, and C3 treatments at the R1 and R3 stages decreased by an average of 8.5%, 16.5%, and 37.1%, respectively. At the R8 stage, the grain dry weight for C1, C2, and C3 decreased by 12.1%, 24.3%, and 32.7% compared with CK, respectively. The photosynthetic characteristics analysis showed that there were no significant differences in photosynthetic indices between the C1/C2 treatments and the CK treatment at any growth stage. However, the C3 treatment significantly inhibited the net photosynthetic rate, relative chlorophyll content, and Photosystem II activity at the R1 stage, although its photosynthetic capacity recovered by the R3 stage. Nitrogen metabolism studies indicated that defoliation treatments reduced total aboveground nitrogen accumulation. Although the proportion of grain nitrogen reached 93.6% in the late reproductive stage, insufficient nitrogen supply from source organs limited sink capacity. At maturity stage, the difference in protein content between the treatment with the highest and the lowest values was only 1.27%. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) indicated that yield was positively correlated with LAI, photosynthetic rate, nitrogen accumulation, and lower-layer pod number, but negatively correlated with the height of the lowest pod. 【Conclusion】 Defoliation at the seedling stage exerts a significant negative impact on summer soybean yield, with the magnitude of yield loss increasing with defoliation intensity. Comprehensive analysis indicates that leaf area index (LAI), photosynthetic performance, nitrogen accumulation, and basal pod number serve as key sensitive indicators characterizing the degree of leaf injury. Elucidating the response patterns of these parameters offers a scientific basis for developing stress-resilient cultivation strategies for soybean.

Key words: seedling-stage defoliation, yield formation, photosynthetic performance, source-sink balance, nitrogen metabolism, soybean