绿洲灌区密植减量施氮玉米的水分利用特征

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.16.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】针对干旱灌区水资源有限、玉米生产氮肥投入过高、水分利用效率（WUE）低等问题，探讨密植补偿减量施氮对玉米水分利用效率负效应的可行性，为建立玉米节氮、水分高效利用技术提供理论依据。【方法】于2019—2022年在甘肃武威设置裂区试验，主区设减量施氮（N₁，270 kg·hm^-2）和传统施氮（N₂，360 kg·hm^-2）两个水平，裂区设传统密度（M₁，78 000株/hm²）、中密度（M₂，103 500株/hm²）和高密度（M₃，129 000株/hm²）3个水平，N₂M₁为对照，重点研究施氮、种植密度及两者互作对玉米耗水特性、水分利用效率的影响。【结果】试验年度内，减量施氮较传统施氮处理耗水量降低4.7%，高、中密度较传统密度处理耗水量分别增大8.4%、4.2%，减量施氮与中密度组合（N₁M₂）与对照相比耗水量无显著差异。玉米籽粒产量随施氮量的减少而降低，中密度较高密度、传统密度显著提高了籽粒产量，减量施氮与中密度组合较对照提高了籽粒产量。减量施氮较传统施氮处理籽粒产量降低了4.6%，中密度较高密度、传统密度处理籽粒产量分别提高5.6%、8.2%，N₁M₂较N₂M₁籽粒产量提高4.3%。减量施氮降低了灌溉水分利用效率（IWUE），但能够保持与传统施氮相同的WUE；中密度有利于提高玉米IWUE和WUE，补偿减量施氮导致的水分利用效率下降。4年内，减量施氮使玉米IWUE降低4.5%，但WUE未显著下降；中密度较传统密度、高密度处理的IWUE分别提高8.6%、6.4%，WUE分别提高4.5%、10.1%；中密度对减量施氮IWUE和WUE的补偿效应分别为4.3%和5.2%。【结论】在干旱灌区，玉米全生育期施氮270 kg·hm^-2、密度103 500株/hm²较现有水氮管理水平提高了产量和水分利用效率，是适用于该区域的玉米节氮、水分高效利用生产技术。

关键词: 减量施氮, 密植, 土壤含水量, 耗水量, 水分利用效率

Abstract:

【Objective】In arid irrigation area, the problem of limited water resources, high nitrogen fertilizer input, and low water use efficiency (WUE) in maize production is serious, it’s necessary to investigate the viability of dense planting to compensate for the negative impact of reduced nitrogen application on the water use efficiency of maize, so as to provide academic foundation for the maize production with reduced nitrogen but high water use efficiency.【Method】From 2019 to 2022, a split-plot experiment was carried out in Wuwei, Gansu Province. Two levels of nitrogen application rate, including reduced nitrogen application (N₁, 270 kg·hm^-2) and traditional nitrogen application (N₂, 360 kg·hm^-2) were set in the main plot. Three planting densities, including traditional density (M₁, 78 000 plants/hm²), medium density (M₂, 103 500 plants/hm²), and high density (M₃, 129 000 plants/hm²) were set in the split-plot, N₂M₁ was set as the control. The effects of nitrogen application, plant density and their interaction on water consumption characteristics and water use efficiency of maize were mainly studied.【Result】In the trial year, the water consumption of reduced nitrogen application was 4.7% lower than that of traditional nitrogen application. The water consumption of the combination of reduced nitrogen application and medium density (N₁M₂) was not significantly different from that of the control. The water consumption of high and medium density treatments increased by 8.4% and 4.2% respectively compared with that of traditional density treatment. The grain yield of maize decreased with the reduction of nitrogen application. Medium density could increase grain yield compared with high density and traditional density. The combination of reduced nitrogen application and medium density increased the grain yield compared with the control. In the test year, the grain yield of the reduced nitrogen application treatment was 4.6% lower than that of traditional nitrogen application treatment, the grain yield of the medium density treatment was increased by 5.6% and 8.2% respectively compared with high density treatment and traditional density, and the grain yield of N₁M₂ was 4.3% higher than that of N₂M₁. Reducing nitrogen application reduced IWUE, but maintained the same WUE as traditional nitrogen application; Medium density was beneficial to improve WUE and IWUE, and could compensate for the WUE decrease caused by reduced nitrogen application. In the four study years, the IWUE decreased by 4.5% due to reduced nitrogen application, and there was no significant difference in WUE between the two nitrogen application levels; Compared with the traditional and high density treatments, the IWUE of the medium density treatment increased by 8.6% and 6.4%, respectively, and the WUE increased by 4.5% and 10.1%, respectively; The compensation effects of medium density on the IWUE and WUE were 4.3% and 5.2%, respectively.【Conclusion】In arid irrigation area, applying nitrogen of 270 kg·hm^-2 and density of 103 500 plants/hm² during the whole growth period of maize can increase the yield and water use efficiency compared with the existing water and nitrogen management measures, which is a production technology for nitrogen saving and water efficient utilization of maize in this area.

Key words: nitrogen reduction, high planting density, soil water content, water consumption, water use efficiency

焦智辉, 陈桂平, 范虹, 张金丹, 殷文, 李含婷, 王琦明, 胡发龙, 柴强. 绿洲灌区密植减量施氮玉米的水分利用特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(16): 3088-3099.

JIAO ZhiHui, CHEN GuiPing, FAN Hong, ZHANG JinDan, YIN Wen, LI HanTing, WANG QiMing, HU FaLong, CHAI Qiang. Water Use Characteristics of Increased Plant Density and Reduced Nitrogen Application Maize in Oasis Irrigated Area[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2023, 56(16): 3088-3099.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

图4

参考文献 33

[1]	FU W, FAN J, HAO M, HU J, WANG H. Evaluating the effects of plastic film mulching patterns on cultivation of winter wheat in a dryland cropping system on the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 244: 106550. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106550
[2]	张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 915-924.
	ZHANG F S, WANG J Q, ZHANG W F, CUI Z L, MA W Q, CHEN X P, JIANG R F. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5): 915-924. (in Chinese)
[3]	巨晓棠. 理论施氮量的改进及验证——兼论确定作物氮肥推荐量的方法. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(2): 249-261.
	JU X T. Improvement and validation of theoretical N rate (TNR)—Discussing the methods for N fertilizer recommendation. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(2): 249-261. (in Chinese)
[4]	叶盛嘉, 郑晨萌, 张影, 刘星. 氮肥减量配施有机肥对豫中地区冬小麦-夏玉米轮作生产力和土壤性质的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2022, 30(6): 900-912.
	YE S J, ZHENG C M, ZHANG Y, LIU X. Effects of reduced chemical nitrogen input combined with organic fertilizer application on the productivity of winter wheat and summer maize rotation and soil properties in central Henan Province. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2022, 30(6): 900-912. (in Chinese)
[5]	CHAI Q, NEMECEK T, LIANG C, ZHAO C, YU A Z, COULTER J A, WANG Y F, HU F L, WANG L, SIDDIQUE K H M, GAN Y T. Integrated farming with intercropping increases food production while reducing environmental footprint. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(38): e2106382118.
[6]	王玉珑, 于爱忠, 吕汉强, 吕奕彤, 苏向向, 王鹏飞, 柴健. 绿洲灌区麦后复种绿肥并还田对翌年玉米根系性状及水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1350-1362. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23036
	WANG Y L, YU A Z, LÜ H Q, LÜ Y T, SU X X, WANG P F, CHAI J. Effects of green manure replanting and returning after wheat on following year’s maize root traits and water use efficiency in oasis irrigation area. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(5): 1350-1362. (in Chinese)
[7]	李含婷, 柴强, 王琦明, 胡发龙, 于爱忠, 赵财, 殷文, 樊志龙, 范虹. 绿洲灌区不同施氮水平下玉米绿肥间作模式的水分利用特征. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(12): 2608-2618. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.12.011. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.12.011
	LI H T, CHAI Q, WANG Q M, HU F L, YU A Z, ZHAO C, YIN W, FAN Z L, FAN H. Water use characteristics of maize-green manure intercropping under different nitrogen application levels in the oasis irrigation area. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(12): 2608-2618. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.12.011. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.12.011
[8]	杨忠浩, 党廷辉, 路远, 吴三鼎, 郑利芳. 黄土塬区春玉米氮肥-水分-产量关系研究. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(4): 237-240, 248.
	YANG Z H, DANG T H, LU Y, WU S D, ZHENG L F. Study on the relationship between nitrogen fertilizer-water-yield of spring maize in the Loess Plateau. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(4): 237-240, 248. (in Chinese)
[9]	MENG Q, YUE S, HOU P, CUI Z, CHEN X. Improving yield and nitrogen use efficiency simultaneously for maize and wheat in China: A review. Pedosphere, 2016, 26(2): 137-147. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60030-3
[10]	韦金贵, 郭瑶, 柴强, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙. 水氮减量密植玉米的产量及产量构成. 作物学报, 2023, 49(7): 1919-1929. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23056
	WEI J G, GUO Y, CHAI Q, YIN W, FAN Z L, HU F L. Yield and yield components of maize response to high plant density under reduced water and nitrogen supply. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(7): 1919-1929. (in Chinese)
[11]	赵晖, 李尚中, 樊廷录, 赵刚, 党翼, 王磊, 张建军, 王淑英, 程万莉, 唐小明. 种植密度与施氮量对旱地地膜玉米产量、水分利用效率和品质的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(5): 169-177.
	ZHAO H, LI S Z, FAN T L, ZHAO G, DANG Y, WANG L, ZHANG J J, WANG S Y, CHENG W L, TANG X M. Effects of planting density and nitrogen fertilizer rate on yield, water use efficiency and quality of dryland maize with film mulching. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(5): 169-177. (in Chinese)
[12]	王巧梅, 樊志龙, 赵彦华, 殷文, 柴强. 绿洲灌区不同密度玉米群体的耗水特性研究. 作物学报, 2017, 43(9): 1347-1356.
	WANG Q M, FAN Z L, ZHAO Y H, YIN W, CHAI Q. Effect of planting density on water consumption characteristics of maize in oasis irrigation area. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(9): 1347-1356. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01347
[13]	李敖, 张元红, 温鹏飞, 王瑞, 董朝阳, 宁芳, 李军. 耕作、施氮和密度及其互作对旱地春玉米土壤水分及产量形成的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(10): 1959-1970. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.10.004. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.10.004
	LI A, ZHANG Y H, WEN P F, WANG R, DONG Z Y, NING F, LI J. Effects of tillage, nitrogen application, planting density and their interaction on soil moisture and yield formation of spring maize in dryland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(10): 1959-1970. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.10.004. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.10.004
[14]	张平良, 郭天文, 刘晓伟, 李书田, 曾骏, 谭雪莲, 董博. 密度和施氮量互作对全膜双垄沟播玉米产量、氮素和水分利用效率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(4): 579-590.
	ZHANG P L, GUO T W, LIU X W, LI S T, ZENG J, TAN X L, DONG B. Effect of plant density and nitrogen application rate on yield, nitrogen and water use efficiencies of spring maize under whole plastic-film mulching and double-furrow sowing. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(4): 579-590. (in Chinese)
[15]	张展军, 杨宏伟, 樊志龙, 于爱忠, 胡发龙, 殷文, 范虹, 郭瑶, 柴强, 赵财. 绿洲灌区免耕一膜两年用玉米密植的水分承载潜力. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(16): 3406-3416. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.16.004. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.16.004
	ZHANG Z J, YANG H W, FAN Z L, YU A Z, HU F L, YIN W, FAN H, GUO Y, CHAI Q, ZHAO C. Water-carrying potential of no-tillage with plastic film mulching for 2-year coupled with maize high-density planting in oasis irrigation area. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(16): 3406-3416. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.16.004. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.16.004
[16]	殷文, 柴强, 胡发龙, 樊志龙, 范虹, 于爱忠, 赵财. 干旱内陆灌区不同秸秆还田方式下春小麦田土壤水分利用特征. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(7): 1247-1259. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.012. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.012
	YIN W, CHAI Q, HU F L, FAN Z L, FAN H, YU A Z, ZHAO C. Characteristics of soil water utilization in spring wheat field with different straw retention approaches in dry inland irrigation areas. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(7): 1247-1259. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.012. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.07.012
[17]	YIN W, FENG F X, ZHAO C, YU A Z, HU F L, CHAI Q, GAN Y T, GUO Y. Integrated double mulching practices optimizes soil temperature and improves soil water utilization in arid environments. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2016, 60(9): 1423-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00484-016-1134-y pmid: 26813883
[18]	GUO R, QIAN R, YANG L, KHALIQ A, HAN F, HUSSAIN S, ZHANG P, CAI T, JIA Z K, CHEN X L, REN X L. Interactive effects of maize straw-derived biochar and N fertilization on soil bulk density and porosity, maize productivity and nitrogen use efficiency in arid areas. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2022, 22(4): 4566-4586. doi: 10.1007/s42729-022-00881-1
[19]	BAI T S, WANG P, YE C L, HU S J. Form of nitrogen input dominates N effects on root growth and soil aggregation: A meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2021, 157: 108251. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108251
[20]	李丰琇, 马英杰. 不同氮肥处理夏玉米生理生态因子对光合-蒸腾作用的调控. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(5): 102-109.
	LI F X, MA Y J. Regulation of photosynthesis and transpiration of summer maize under different nitrogen treatments. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(5): 102-109. (in Chinese)
[21]	石超, 邢毅, 冯军, 周泉, 王龙昌, 武海燕, 冉泰霖, 向信华. 减氮增密对西南丘陵区旱地直播油菜根系发育及水分利用的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(1): 9-17.
	SHI C, XING Y, FENG J, ZHOU Q, WANG L C, WU H Y, RAN T L, XIANG X H. Effects of dense planting with less nitrogen fertilizer on root system development and water use efficiency of direct-sowed rapeseed in hilly dryland area in southwest of China. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(1): 9-17. (in Chinese)
[22]	王亮, 林涛, 严昌荣, 王静, 郭瑞霞, 岳璐珂, 汤秋香. 地膜残留量对新疆棉田蒸散及棵间蒸发的影响. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(14): 120-128.
	WANG L, LIN T, YAN C R, WANG J, GUO R X, YUE L K, TANG Q X. Effects of plastic film residue on evapotranspiration and soil evaporation in cotton field of Xinjiang. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(14): 120-128. (in Chinese)
[23]	王健, 蔡焕杰, 康燕霞, 陈凤. 夏玉米棵间土面蒸发与蒸发蒸腾比例研究. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(4): 17-22.
	WANG J, CAI H J, KANG Y X, CHEN F. Ratio of soil evaporation to the evapotranspiration for summer maize field. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 23(4): 17-22. (in Chinese)
[24]	HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN H, ANDERSEN M K, JØRNSGAARD B, JENSEN E S. Density and relative frequency effects on competitive interactions and resource use in pea-barley intercrops. Field Crops Research, 2006, 95(2/3): 256-267. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.03.003
[25]	魏廷邦, 柴强, 王伟民, 王军强. 水氮耦合及种植密度对绿洲灌区玉米光合作用和干物质积累特征的调控效应. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(3): 428-444. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.03.004. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.03.004
	WEI T B, CHAI Q, WANG W M, WANG J Q. Effects of coupling of irrigation and nitrogen application as well as planting density on photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation characteristics of maize in oasis irrigated areas. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(3): 428-444. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.03.004. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.03.004
[26]	WANG C, QI Z, ZHAO J C, GAO Z Z, ZHAO J, CHEN F, CHU Q Q. Sustainable water and nitrogen optimization to adapt to different temperature variations and rainfall patterns for a trade-off between winter wheat yield and N₂O emissions. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 854: 158822. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158822
[27]	胡旦旦, 张吉旺, 刘鹏, 赵斌, 董树亭. 不同密度混播对玉米植株¹³C同化物分配和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(10): 3229-3236. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201810.021
	HU D D, ZHANG J W, LIU P, ZHAO B, DONG S T. Effects of different densities of mixed-cropping on ¹³C-photosynthate distribution and grain yield of maize. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(10): 3229-3236. (in Chinese)
[28]	郭瑶, 柴强, 殷文, 范虹. 玉米密植光合生理机制及应用途径研究进展. 作物学报, 2022, 48(8): 1871-1883. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.13024
	GUO Y, CHAI Q, YIN W, FAN H. Research progress of photosynthetic physiological mechanism and approaches to application in dense planting maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(8): 1871-1883. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2022.13024
[29]	殷文, 郭瑶, 范虹, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 于爱忠, 赵财, 柴强. 西北干旱灌区不同地膜覆盖利用方式对玉米水分利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(22): 4750-4760. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.22.004. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.22.004
	YIN W, GUO Y, FAN H, FAN Z L, HU F L, YU A Z, ZHAO C, CHAI Q. Effects of different plastic film mulching and using patterns on soil water use of maize in arid irrigated area of Northwestern China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(22): 4750-4760. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.22.004. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.22.004
[30]	范虹, 殷文, 柴强. 间作优势的光合生理机制及其冠层微环境特征. 中国生态农业学报, 2022, 30(11): 1750-1761.
	FAN H, YIN W, CHAI Q. Research progress on photo-physiological mechanisms and characteristics of canopy microenvironment in the formation of intercropping advantages. Chinese Journal of Eco- Agriculture, 2022, 30(11): 1750-1761. (in Chinese)
[31]	GUO Y, YIN W, FAN H, FAN Z L, HU F L, YU A Z, ZHAO C, CHAI Q, AZIIBA E A, ZHANG X J. Photosynthetic physiological characteristics of water and nitrogen coupling for enhanced high-density tolerance and increased yield of maize in arid irrigation regions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 726568. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.726568
[32]	张建军, 樊廷录, 党翼, 赵刚, 王磊, 李尚中, 王淑英, 程万莉. 覆膜时期与施氮量对旱地玉米土壤耗水特征及产量的影响. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(6): 72-78.
	ZHANG J J, FAN Y L, DANG Y, ZHAO G, WANG L, LI S Z, WANG S Y, CHENG W L. Effect of film mulching period and nitrogen application rate on soil water consumption characteristics and maize yield in dryland. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(6): 72-78. (in Chinese)
[33]	唐心龙, 刘莹, 秦喜彤, 张雨寒, 王腾, 李博, 薛瑞锋, 李济, 李昊, 石武良, 李斌, 李秋祝, 王洪预, 崔金虎, 姜文洙, 曹宁, 张玉斌. 玉米光能利用率和产量对密度、施氮量及其互作的响应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(10): 1864-1873.
	TANG X L, LIU Y, QIN X T, ZHANG Y H, WANG T, LI B, XUE R F, LI J, LI H, SHI W L, LI B, LI Q Z, WANG H Y, CUI J H, JIANG W Z, CAO N, ZHANG Y B. Response of light use efficiency and grain yield of maize to planting density and nitrogen application rate. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(10): 1864-1873. (in Chinese)

处理 Treatment	播前贮水量 Soil water storage before sowing				收后贮水量 Soil water storage after harvest				全生育期耗水量 Water consumption during the whole growth period
处理 Treatment	2019	2020	2021	2022	2019	2020	2021	2022	2019	2020	2021	2022
N₁M₁	338.7a	338.6a	344.3a	340.1a	312.6a	300.2a	309.2a	315.7a	598.3d	576.5f	595.3e	641.8d
N₁M₂	340.4a	340.9a	341.2a	344.3a	272.0c	267.8c	270.4c	302.1ab	618.0c	583.4e	608.4d	654.8cd
N₁M₃	337.1a	338.2a	329.5a	339.4a	291.4b	292.7b	281.3b	282.5bc	664.9b	621.3c	640.2c	674.3bc
N₂M₁	339.9a	340.0a	343.3a	340.8a	248.5e	251.6d	250.8e	303.5ab	620.5c	594.4d	611.0d	659.7cd
N₂M₂	341.4a	337.8a	341.5a	342.7a	251.3d	254.5d	261.4d	271.9c	660.7b	626.4b	652.7b	688.2b
N₂M₃	339.8a	342.4a	339.1a	339.9a	227.4f	238.0e	228.2f	244.6d	684.5a	639.1a	674.4a	712.8a
显著性（P值）Significance (P value)
年份Year (Y)	NS				**				**
施氮水平 N fertilizer	NS				**				**
种植密度Density (D)	NS				**				**
N×D	NS				**				**
Y×N	NS				**				NS
Y×D	NS				**				**
Y×N×D	NS				**				**

年份 Year	处理 Treatment	播种期至拔节期 Sowing-jointing	拔节期至大喇叭口期 Jointing-big trumpet	大喇叭口期至开花期 Big trumpet-flowering	开花期至灌浆期 Flowering-filling	灌浆期至成熟期 Filling-maturation
2019	N₁M₁	132.6d	143.1b	95.2c	84.9c	142.3e
	N₁M₂	138.8cd	144.4b	94.6c	84.5c	155.4d
	N₁M₃	144.4bc	152.1a	95.6c	101.7a	168.3a
	N₂M₁	149.9b	151.2a	99.0b	79.2d	141.3e
	N₂M₂	167.9a	153.4a	100.1b	83.8c	158.3c
	N₂M₃	171.2a	154.1a	102.9a	93.7b	162.6b
2020	N₁M₁	111.6d	107.9d	106.0a	107.1b	143.9c
	N₁M₂	128.9c	105.8e	99.6c	105.5b	143.6c
	N₁M₃	133.3c	114.2b	103.4b	113.3a	157.1a
	N₂M₁	129.8c	112.0c	105.9a	108.0b	138.7d
	N₂M₂	140.9b	124.8a	101.1c	109.5ab	150.1b
	N₂M₃	150.0a	124.4a	104.0ab	107.4b	153.3b
2021	N₁M₁	134.5cd	116.6d	94.1b	99.9c	150.1e
	N₁M₂	136.9cd	128.5bc	91.2c	98.5d	153.2d
	N₁M₃	132.0d	130.b	96.8ab	110.9a	169.8a
	N₂M₁	139.7c	125.5c	96.4ab	101.0c	148.4f
	N₂M₂	156.5b	142.3a	95.4ab	100.1c	158.4c
	N₂M₃	163.8a	144.8a	98.3a	104.5b	163.0b
2022	N₁M₁	130.8d	138.5c	87.8a	112.9b	171.9d
	N₁M₂	136.9cd	134.3d	89.0a	116.0ab	178.6cd
	N₁M₃	143.5bc	141.1bc	86.4a	120.0ab	183.0bc
	N₂M₁	136.1cd	139.1c	88.3a	110.5b	185.7abc
	N₂M₂	147.8ab	142.9b	85.5a	120.6ab	191.3ab
	N₂M₃	155.1a	149.6a	85.1a	127.2a	195.8a
显著性（P值）Significance (P value)
年份Year (Y)		**	**	**	**	**
施氮水平N fertilizer		**	**	*	*	*
种植密度Density (D)		**	**	**	**	**
N×D		**	**	NS	*	**
Y×N		**	**	**	**	**
Y×D		*	**	**	*	**
Y×N×D		**	**	NS	NS	NS