不同产区甜瓜果肉6种营养素生物可及性差异及其与土壤元素含量的回归分析

doi:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.04.012

中国农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 779-791.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.04.012

不同产区甜瓜果肉6种营养素生物可及性差异及其与土壤元素含量的回归分析

王晓婷¹^,²(), 沈琦², 盘菊秀¹^,², 马磊²^,³, 何伟忠²(), 王成⁴()

¹ 新疆农业大学食品科学与药学学院，乌鲁木齐 830052
² 新疆农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所/农业农村部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室/农业农村部荒漠绿洲生态区特色农产品功能营养与健康重点实验室（部省共建）/新疆农产品质量安全重点实验室，乌鲁木齐 830091
³ 新疆农业大学农学院，乌鲁木齐 830052
⁴ 新疆农业科学院，乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2024-08-13 接受日期:2024-10-18 出版日期:2025-02-16 发布日期:2025-02-24
通信作者:
何伟忠，E-mail：heweizhong12@163.com。
王成，E-mail：wangcheng312@sina.com。
联系方式: 王晓婷，E-mail：xiaoting000202@163.com。
基金资助:
财政部和农业农村部：国家现代农业产业技术体系资助项目(CARS-25); 新疆维吾尔自治区重大科技专项(2022A02006-1); 新疆维吾尔自治区西甜瓜产业技术体系资助(XJARS-06); 新疆农业科学院农业科技创新稳定支持项目(xjnkywdzc-2023003-1)

Regression Analysis of the Differences in the Bioaccessibility of Six Nutrients in the Flesh of Melons from Different Production Areas and Their Relationship with Soil Element Content

WANG XiaoTing¹^,²(), SHEN Qi², PAN JuXiu¹^,², MA Lei²^,³, HE WeiZhong²(), WANG Cheng⁴()

¹ College of Food Science and Pharmacy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052
² Institute of Agricultural Quality Standards and Testing Technology, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Laboratory of Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Risk Assessment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Key Laboratory of Functional Nutrition and Health of Characteristic Agricultural Products in Desert Oasis Ecological Zone (Jointly Built by Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs)/Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety of Xinjiang Agricultural Products, Urumqi 830091
³ College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052
⁴ Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091

Received:2024-08-13 Accepted:2024-10-18 Published:2025-02-16 Online:2025-02-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】明确不同产区甜瓜果肉4种糖、2种维生素生物可及性差异，探讨土壤元素含量对该差异形成的影响，为甜瓜种植与消费者提供建议和饮食参考。【方法】以新疆吐鲁番、哈密、伊宁3个产区30份同品种甜瓜‘纳斯密’果肉及对应根际土壤为研究对象，通过高效液相色谱仪（HPLC）、电感耦合等离子体质谱仪（ICP-MS）等设备，分析甜瓜果肉样品中还原糖、果糖、葡萄糖、蔗糖、VB₁、VB₂及土壤样品中Fe、Mn、Zn等22种元素的含量，采用体外模拟消化检测相关营养素含量，计算营养素生物可及性；采用相关性分析、正交偏最小二乘回归PLS-DA、多元线性回归分析等统计分析方法，比较3个产区甜瓜果肉上述4种糖、2种维生素生物可及性差异，探讨土壤元素含量对该差异的影响。【结果】吐鲁番甜瓜果肉还原糖、果糖生物可及性分别为118.35%、113.02%，高于其他2个产区；哈密甜瓜果肉葡萄糖生物可及性高于其他2个产区，达195.27%；伊宁甜瓜果肉VB₁和VB₂含量及生物可及性高于其他2个产区。相关性分析结果表明，甜瓜果肉还原糖生物可及性与土壤中Cr、Ni、Sn、Sb、Ba、Tl、Pb 7种元素含量呈显著负相关，与B元素含量呈正相关；葡萄糖生物可及性与土壤Be、Al、Sr、Sn、Sb、Ba、Tl、Pb含量呈负相关，与Ti、V、Co、Cu、As、Se、Mo含量呈正相关；VB₁生物可及性与土壤中Cr、Co、Ni、Cu、B、Sr含量呈正相关；VB₂生物可及性与土壤中Al、Sr含量呈正相关。回归分析结果表明，土壤元素含量是影响甜瓜果肉中4种营养素生物可及性的重要因素，被影响程度大小依次是葡萄糖>VB₁>还原糖>VB₂，土壤Tl、V、Zn、Sn，Al、Zn、Sb，Tl、Fe、Mn、Zn，Al、V、Sr、Cd、Ba含量分别是影响甜瓜果肉葡萄糖、还原糖、VB₁和VB₂生物可及性的重要因子。【结论】可通过调控土壤中Tl、V、Zn、Sn，Al、Zn、Sb，Tl、Fe、Mn、Zn，Al、V、Sr、Cd、Ba等元素含量的方式，探索甜瓜果肉葡萄糖、还原糖、VB₁和VB₂生物可及性提升技术。

关键词: 甜瓜, 营养素, 土壤元素, 生物可及性, PLS-DA, 回归分析

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aimed to clarify the differences in the bioaccessibility of four sugars and two vitamins in melon pulp from different producing areas, and to explore the influence of soil element content on the formation of this difference, so as to provide suggestions and dietary references for melon cultivation and consumers.【Method】Taking the pulp of 30 samples of the same variety of melon Nasimi and the corresponding rhizosphere soil from Turpan, Hami, Yining producing areas as the research object, the content of reducing sugar, fructose, glucose, sucrose, VB₁, VB₂ and 22 elements (such as Fe, Mn, and Zn) in soil samples were analyzed with test equipment, such as high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) and inductively co,upled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). In vitro simulated digestion was used to detect the content of related nutrients, and the bioaccessibility of nutrients was calculated. Statistical analysis methods such as correlation analysis, orthogonal partial least squares regression PLS-DA, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to compare the differences in the bioaccessibility of the above four sugars and two vitamins in melon pulp from three producing areas, and to explore the influence of soil element content on this difference.【Result】The bioaccessibility of reducing sugar and fructose in Turpan melon pulp was 118.35% and 113.02%, respectively, which was higher than that in the other two producing areas. The bioaccessibility of glucose in Hami melon pulp was higher than that in the other two producing areas, reaching 195.27%. The content and bioaccessibility of VB1 and VB2 in Yining melon pulp were higher than those in the other two producing areas. The results of correlation analysis showed that the bioaccessibility of reducing sugar in melon pulp was significantly negatively correlated with the contents of seven elements (Cr, Ni, Sn, Sb, Ba, Tl, and Pb) in soil, and positively correlated with the content of B element. The bioaccessibility of glucose was negatively correlated with the content of Be, Al, Sr, Sn, Sb, Ba, Tl, and Pb in soil, and positively correlated with the content of Ti, V, Co, Cu, As, Se, and Mo. The bioaccessibility of VB₁ was positively correlated with the content of Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, B, and Sr in soil. The bioaccessibility of VB₂ was positively correlated with the content of Al and Sr in soil. Regression analysis results showed that soil element content was an important factor affecting the bioaccessibility of four nutrients in melon pulp, and the influence degree was in the order of glucose > VB₁ > reducing sugar > VB₂. The content of Tl, V, Zn, Sn; Al, Zn, Sb, Tl, Fe, Mn, Zn; Al, V, Sr, Cd, and Ba in soil were important factors affecting the bioaccessibility of glucose, reducing sugar, VB₁, and VB₂ in melon pulp.【Conclusion】The technology for improving the bioaccessibility of glucose, reducing sugar, VB1, and VB2 in melon pulp could be explored by regulating the content of elements, such as Tl, V, Zn, Sn; Al, Zn, Sb, Tl, Fe, Mn, Zn; Al, V, Sr, Cd, and Ba in soil.

Key words: melon, nutrients, soil elements, bioaccessibility, PLS-DA, regression analysis

王晓婷, 沈琦, 盘菊秀, 马磊, 何伟忠, 王成. 不同产区甜瓜果肉6种营养素生物可及性差异及其与土壤元素含量的回归分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(4): 779-791.

WANG XiaoTing, SHEN Qi, PAN JuXiu, MA Lei, HE WeiZhong, WANG Cheng. Regression Analysis of the Differences in the Bioaccessibility of Six Nutrients in the Flesh of Melons from Different Production Areas and Their Relationship with Soil Element Content[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(4): 779-791.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2025.04.012

https://www.chinaagrisci.com/CN/Y2025/V58/I4/779

图/表 8

表1

单因素ANOVA分析"

指标 Index	吐鲁番 Turpan	哈密 Hami	伊宁 Yining	P值 P value
还原糖 Reduced sugar (%)	6.950±1.017a	4.323±0.524c	6.013±0.679b	<0.001
果糖 Fructose (%)	2.293±0.354a	1.937±0.353b	2.493±0.312a	0.005
葡萄糖 Glucose (%)	1.996±0.415a	1.398±0.292b	1.708±0.230a	0.001
蔗糖 Sucrose (%)	2.232±0.882b	4.802±0.585a	1.078±0.819c	<0.001
VB₁(mg/100 g)	0.037±0.010a	0.022±0.002b	0.025±0.007b	<0.001
VB₂(mg/100 g)	0.001±0.001c	0.004±0.002b	0.007±0.002a	<0.001
Be (mg·kg^-1)	1.226±0.047a	1.007±0.068b	1.185±0.106a	<0.001
B (mg·kg^-1)	6403.081±3292.233a	6859.677±764.490a	3470.557±1720.768b	0.005
Al (mg·kg^-1)	26045.146±2210.051a	22081.539±3094.380a	24310.284±2744.053ab	0.011
Ti (mg·kg^-1)	2679.798±84.611b	2905.186±158.030a	2660.514±187.023b	0.002
V (mg·kg^-1)	61.757±1.617b	79.872±6.827a	66.745±6.840b	<0.001
Cr (mg·kg^-1)	29.047±1.199b	36.724±3.263a	37.497±1.183a	<0.001
Mn (mg·kg^-1)	427.963±18.289b	509.549±48.605a	478.974±23.009a	<0.001
Fe (mg·kg^-1)	16658.762±464.857c	19546.061±1678.809a	18249.946±696.376b	<0.001
Co (mg·kg^-1)	11.715±0.621c	16.688±1.983a	15.012±1.057b	<0.001
Ni (mg·kg^-1)	23.630±0.981b	32.612±3.278a	33.968±0.828a	<0.001
Cu (mg·kg^-1)	24.206±1.535c	41.251±4.111a	34.608±5.288b	<0.001
Zn (mg·kg^-1)	52.971±19.797b	101.975±64.296a	88.037±31.239ab	0.049
As (mg·kg^-1)	16.101±4.361b	23.899±2.699a	18.355±3.640b	<0.001
Se (mg·kg^-1)	0.972±0.077c	1.331±0.137a	1.156±0.107b	<0.001
Sr (mg·kg^-1)	259.549±54.345a	192.192±33.019b	217.217±19.466b	0.002
Mo (mg·kg^-1)	2.696±0.692b	4.014±0.473a	2.497±0.911b	<0.001
Cd (mg·kg^-1)	0.354±0.074b	0.470±0.050a	0.430±0.050a	<0.001
Sn (mg·kg^-1)	2.696±0.190b	2.664±0.208b	3.193±0.268a	<0.001
Sb (mg·kg^-1)	1.455±0.081b	1.398±0.124b	1.874±0.261a	<0.001
Ba (mg·kg^-1)	438.375±108.901b	390.512±58.132b	579.006±104.139a	<0.001
Tl (mg·kg^-1)	0.385±0.011b	0.361±0.038b	0.482±0.068a	<0.001
Pb (mg·kg^-1)	17.872±0.773b	17.896±1.883b	23.676±3.232a	<0.001

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 39

[1]	古娜斯·叶尔肯, 魏征, 王豪杰, 朱靖蓉, 华震宇, 孙涛, 陈洁, 王成. 新疆地区栽培5种甜瓜营养成分比较分析. 食品研究与开发, 2019, 40(6): 115-119, 125.
	GUNASIYEERKEN, WEI Z, WANG H J, ZHU Z R, HUA Z Y, SUN T, CHEN J, WANG C. Comparative analysis of nutritional ingredients in five different melon varieties in Xinjiang. Food Research and Development, 2019, 40(6): 115-119, 125. (in Chinese)
[2]	杨世英, 马玉娥, 贾斌鑫, 华震宇, 沈琦, 刘峰娟, 王成. 油菜素内酯对甜瓜农药残留的降解作用分析. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2541-2550. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.10.024
	YANG S Y, MA Y E, JIA B X, HUA Z Y, SHEN Q, LIU F J, WANG C. Study on degradation of pesticide residues in muskmelon by brassinolide. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2541-2550. (in Chinese) doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.10.024
[3]	DEMIR B, GÜRBÜZ M, JALE Ç, UĞUR H, DUMAN E, BECEREN Y, YAMAN M. In vitro bioaccessibility of vitamins B1, B2, and B3 from various vegetables. Food Chemistry, 2023, 398: 133944.
[4]	HERNÁNDEZ-MALDONADO L M, BLANCAS-BENÍTEZ F J, ZAMORA-GASGA V M, CÁRDENAS-CASTRO A P, TOVAR J, SÁYAGO-AYERDI S G. In vitro gastrointestinal digestion and colonic fermentation of high dietary fiber and antioxidant-rich mango (Mangifera indica L.) “ataulfo” -based fruit bars. Nutrients, 2019, 11(7): 1564.
[5]	SUN Y J, TAO W Y, HUANG H Z, YE X Q, SUN P L. Flavonoids, phenolic acids, carotenoids and antioxidant activity of fresh eating Citrus fruits, using the coupled in vitro digestion and human intestinal HepG2 cells model. Food Chemistry, 2019, 279: 321-327.
[6]	罗牡康, 贾栩超, 张瑞芬, 刘磊, 董丽红, 池建伟, 白亚娟, 张名位. 杨桃的酚类成分含量及其生物可及性与抗氧化活性. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(7): 1459-1472. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.07.014.
	LUO M K, JIA X C, ZHANG R F, LIU L, DONG L H, CHI J W, BAI Y J, ZHANG M W. Phenolic content, bioavailability and antioxidant activity of carambola. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(7): 1459-1472. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.07.014. (in Chinese)
[7]	MIRAJI K F, LINNEMANN A R, FOGLIANO V, LASWAI H S, CAPUANO E. Nutritional quality and in vitro digestion of immature rice-based processed products. Food & Function, 2020, 11(9): 7611-7625.
[8]	LYU F, VAN DER POEL A F B, HENDRIKS W H, THOMAS M. Particle size distribution of hammer-milled maize and soybean meal, its nutrient composition and in vitro digestion characteristics. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2021, 281: 115095.
[9]	SCROB T, COVACI E, HOSU A, TANASELIA C, CASONI D, TOROK A I, FRENTIU T, CIMPOIU C. Effect of in vitro simulated gastrointestinal digestion on some nutritional characteristics of several dried fruits. Food Chemistry, 2022, 385: 132713.
[10]	TOUTOUNJI M R, FARAHNAKY A, SANTHAKUMAR A B, OLI P, BUTARDO V M, BLANCHARD C L. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting rice starch digestibility. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2019, 88: 10-22.
[11]	NIEDBAŁA G, WRÓBEL B, PIEKUTOWSKA M, ZIELEWICZ W, PASZKIEWICZ-JASIŃSKA A, WOJCIECHOWSKI T, NIAZIAN M. Application of artificial neural networks sensitivity analysis for the pre-identification of highly significant factors influencing the yield and digestibility of grassland sward in the climatic conditions of central Poland. Agronomy, 2022, 12(5): 1133.
[12]	ICHINOSE J, OBA K, ARASE Y, KANESHIRO J, TATE S I, WATANABE T M. Quantitative prediction of rice starch digestibility using Raman spectroscopy and multivariate calibration analysis. Food Chemistry, 2024, 435: 137505.
[13]	HABERMANN E, CONTIN D R, AFONSO L F, BAROSELA J R, DE PINHO COSTA K A, VICIEDO D O, GROPPO M, MARTINEZ C A. Future warming will change the chemical composition and leaf blade structure of tropical C3 and C4 forage species depending on soil moisture levels. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 821: 153342.
[14]	MATHEWS B W, CARPENTER J R, SOLLENBERGER L E. In vitro digestibility and chemical composition of kikuyugrass as influenced by soil silicon, liming, and genotype. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2009, 40(17/18): 2855-2873.
[15]	ZHU K X, YAO S W, ZHANG Y J, LIU Q B, XU F, WU G, DONG W J, TAN L H. Effects of in vitro saliva, gastric and intestinal digestion on the chemical properties, antioxidant activity of polysaccharide from Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam. (Jackfruit) Pulp. Food Hydrocolloids, 2019, 87: 952-959.
[16]	OGAWA Y, DONLAO N, THUENGTUNG S, TIAN J H, CAI Y D, REGINIO F C Jr, KETNAWA S, YAMAMOTO N, TAMURA M. Impact of food structure and cell matrix on digestibility of plant-based food. Current Opinion in Food Science, 2018, 19: 36-41.
[17]	HOLLAND C, RYDEN P, EDWARDS C H, GRUNDY M M. Plant cell walls: impact on nutrient bioaccessibility and digestibility. Foods, 2020, 9(2): 201.
[18]	SANTOS-ORTEGA Y, KILLINY N. Silencing of sucrose hydrolase causes nymph mortality and disturbs adult osmotic homeostasis in Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2018, 101: 131-143.
[19]	VENTURA M R, BASTIANELLI D, DENIZ S, SAAVEDRA P, REY L, BONNAL L, GONZÁLEZ-GARCÍA E. Phenolic and tannin compounds in subtropical shrubs (Bituminaria bituminosa, Chamaecytisus proliferus, and Adenocarpus foliosus) and the effects on in vitro digestibility. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2019, 51(6): 1757-1761.
[20]	李同欢, 马振东, 西玉玲, 陈玉莲, 张新东, 杨恩政, 王卓刚. 不同品种高粱对酱香型白酒酿造的影响研究. 酿酒科技, 2023(9): 93-96, 102.
	LI T H, MA Z D, XI Y L, CHEN Y L, ZHANG X D, YANG E Z, WANG Z G. Influence of different Sorghum varieties on the production of Jiangxiang Baijiu. Liquor-Making Science & Technology, 2023(9): 93-96, 102. (in Chinese)
[21]	徐丽丽, 解春霞, 刘云鹏, 郑华英. 树皮内含物对星天牛寄主选择的影响. 安徽农业大学学报, 2023, 50(5): 777-783.
	XU L L, XIE C X, LIU Y P, ZHENG H Y. The influence of bark nutrients to host selection of Anoplophora chinensis. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2023, 50(5): 777-783. (in Chinese)
[22]	孟宪宸. 碣石山产区红色酿酒葡萄成熟度指标体系研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 河北科技师范学院, 2024.
	MENG X C. Study on the maturity index system of red wine grape in Jieshishan area[D]. Qinhuangdao: Hebei Normal University Of Science & Technology, 2024. (in Chinese)
[23]	PICO J, CORBIN S, FERRUZZI M G, MARTINEZ M M. Banana flour phenolics inhibit trans-epithelial glucose transport from wheat cakes in a coupled in vitro digestion/Caco-2 cell intestinal model. Food & Function, 2019, 10(10): 6300-6311.
[24]	PALAFOX-CARLOS H, AYALA-ZAVALA J F, GONZÁLEZ- AGUILAR G A. The role of dietary fiber in the bioaccessibility and bioavailability of fruit and vegetable antioxidants. Journal of Food Science, 2011, 76(1): R6-R15.
[25]	SUTER P M. The B-vitamins. Essential and Toxic Trace Elements and Vitamins in Human Health. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2020: 217-239.
[26]	ANDAÇ ÖZTÜRK S, YAMAN M. Investigation of bioaccessibility of vitamin C in various fruits and vegetables under in vitro gastrointestinal digestion system. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, 2022, 16(5): 3735-3742.
[27]	LIU Z B, HUANG Y, TAN F J, CHEN W C, OU L J. Effects of soil type on trace element absorption and fruit quality of pepper. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 698796.
[28]	SUN H L, HUANG X, CHEN T, ZHOU P Y, HUANG X X, JIN W X, LIU D, ZHANG H T, ZHOU J G, WANG Z J, HAYAT F, GAO Z H. Fruit quality prediction based on soil mineral element content in peach orchard. Food Science & Nutrition, 2022, 10(6): 1756-1767.
[29]	GUPTA C, ARORA S, SYAMA M A, SHARMA A. Preparation of milk protein-vitamin a complexes and their evaluation for vitamin a binding ability. Food Chemistry, 2017, 237: 141-149. doi: S0308-8146(17)30908-1 pmid: 28763979
[30]	穆东祺, 王同智, 金昆, 贾鑫, 曹阳, 薛焱. 不同生境土壤元素对冷蒿有效成分含量的影响. 中成药, 2024, 46(4): 1089-1092.
	MU D Q, WANG T Z, JIN K, JIA X, CAO Y, XUE Y. Effects of soil elements in different habitats on the contents of active constituents in Artemisia frigida. Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine, 2024, 46(4): 1089-1092. (in Chinese)
[31]	陈宇宁. 江西省南丰县白垩系成土母岩-土壤地球化学特征及其对南丰蜜桔品质的影响[D]. 南昌: 东华理工大学, 2022.
	CHEN Y N. Geochemical characteristics of parent rock and soil of Cretaceous in Nanfeng County, Jiangxi Province and its influence on the quality of Nanfeng tangerine[D]. Nanchang: East China University of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese)
[32]	孙雨默, 程林, 韩梅, 杨利民. 不同产地桔梗皂苷生物合成与土壤元素关系的研究. 中草药, 2022, 53(15): 4844-4852.
	SUN Y M, CHENG L, HAN M, YANG L M. Effects of soil elements on platycodin biosynthesis process in Platycodon grandiflorum from different habitats. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2022, 53(15): 4844-4852. (in Chinese)
[33]	MIGNARD P, BEGUERÍA S, GIMÉNEZ R, FONT I FORCADA C, REIG G, MORENO M Á. Effect of genetics and climate on apple sugars and organic acids profiles. Agronomy, 2022, 12(4): 827.
[34]	GAMBETTA J, COZZOLINO D, BASTIAN S, JEFFERY D. Exploring the effects of geographical origin on the chemical composition and quality grading of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Chardonnay grapes. Molecules, 2017, 22(2): 218.
[35]	BIGARD A, BERHE D T, MAODDI E, SIRE Y, BOURSIQUOT J M, OJEDA H, PÉROS J P, DOLIGEZ A, ROMIEU C, TORREGROSA L. Vitis vinifera L. fruit diversity to breed varieties anticipating climate changes. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 455.
[36]	GLAHN R P, WORTLEY G M, SOUTH P K, MILLER D D. Inhibition of iron uptake by phytic acid, tannic acid, and ZnCl₂: Studies using an in vitro digestion/caco-2 cell model. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2002, 50(2): 390-395.
[37]	ANTOINE T, GEORGÉ S, LECA A, DESMARCHELIER C, HALIMI C, GERVAIS S, AUPY F, MARCONOT G, REBOUL E. Reduction of pulse “antinutritional” content by optimizing pulse canning process is insufficient to improve fat-soluble vitamin bioavailability. Food Chemistry, 2022, 370: 131021.
[38]	朱吟非, 谭美, 吴新怡, 王超, 段翰英. 超高压和发芽对大豆中主要营养成分生物利用率的影响. 食品与发酵工业, 2022, 48(12): 145-151. doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.028209
	ZHU Y F, TAN M, WU X Y, WANG C, DUAN H Y. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure and germination on nutrient bioavailability in soybeans. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2022, 48(12): 145-151. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.028209
[39]	JIMOH M O, AFOLAYAN A J, LEWU F B. Nutrients and antinutrient constituents of Amaranthus caudatus L. cultivated on different soils. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2020, 27(12): 3570-3580.

不同产区甜瓜果肉6种营养素生物可及性差异及其与土壤元素含量的回归分析

Regression Analysis of the Differences in the Bioaccessibility of Six Nutrients in the Flesh of Melons from Different Production Areas and Their Relationship with Soil Element Content

RichHTML

PDF

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	杨亚恒, 贾培龙, 乜兰春, 赵文圣, 赵佳腾, 王金祥, 刘杰. 厚皮甜瓜种质材料果实质地品质评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(8): 1560-1574.
[2]	范鹏, 杨天乐, 朱少龙, 王志杰, 张明月, 魏海燕, 刘国栋. 长三角地区半糯粳稻外观品质的评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2024, 57(16): 3105-3115.
[3]	谭凤玲,詹萍,王鹏,田洪磊. 基于感官评价及GC-MS结合OPLS-DA分析热杀菌对蟠桃汁呈香品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(12): 2425-2435.
[4]	张彦,王劲松,董二伟,武爱莲,王媛,焦晓燕. 中晚熟区主要高粱品种耐瘠性综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(23): 4954-4968.
[5]	王岭,才羿,王桂超,王迪,盛云燕. 甜瓜SLAF图谱构建及果实相关性状QTL分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(19): 4196-4206.
[6]	许昕阳,沈佳,张跃建,李国景,牛晓伟,寿伟松. 甜瓜幼果果皮颜色基因GR的精细定位[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(15): 3308-3319.
[7]	马建, 李丛丛, 黄亚婷, 谢雨黎, 程玲玲, 王建设. 甜瓜种皮颜色控制基因CmSC1的精细定位及候选基因分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(10): 2167-2178.
[8]	罗牡康,贾栩超,张瑞芬,刘磊,董丽红,池建伟,白亚娟,张名位. 杨桃的酚类成分含量及其生物可及性与抗氧化活性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(7): 1459-1472.
[9]	马建,李丛丛,王建设. 甜瓜短蔓基因Cmdm1的精细定位及候选基因分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(4): 802-810.
[10]	刘相玉, 张裕舒, 刘柳, 刘识, 高鹏, 王迪, 王学征. 基于CAPS标记的甜瓜单果重相关性状QTL分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(9): 1601-1613.
[11]	薛亮,马忠明,杜少平,冯守疆,冉生斌. 氮素用量对膜下滴灌甜瓜产量以及氮素平衡、硝态氮累积的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(4): 690-700.
[12]	郑晓渊, 王调兰, 张静荣, 姜红, 王斌, 毕阳. 二氧化氯处理促进厚皮甜瓜果实的采后愈伤[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(3): 512-520.
[13]	王佳豪,段雅倩,乜兰春,宋立彦,赵文圣,方思雨,赵佳腾. ‘羊角脆’类甜瓜果实品质因子分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(24): 4582-4591.
[14]	白如霞,曾汇文,范倩,殷洁,隋宗明,袁玲. 撕裂蜡孔菌对黄瓜蔓枯病的防治作用及促生增产效果[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(15): 2604-2615.
[15]	蒋静静,屈锋,苏春杰,杨剑锋,余剑,胡晓辉. 不同肥水耦合对黄瓜产量品质及肥料偏生产力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(1): 86-97.