





中国农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (6): 1095-1109.doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2022.06.004
秦羽青(
),程宏波,柴雨葳,马建涛,李瑞,李亚伟,常磊,柴守玺(
)
收稿日期:2021-06-02
接受日期:2021-11-05
出版日期:2022-03-16
发布日期:2022-03-25
联系方式:
秦羽青,E-mail: 3279533406@qq.com。
基金资助:
QIN YuQing(
),CHENG HongBo,CHAI YuWei,MA JianTao,LI Rui,LI YaWei,CHANG Lei,CHAI ShouXi(
)
Received:2021-06-02
Accepted:2021-11-05
Published:2022-03-16
Online:2022-03-25
摘要:
【目的】明确中国北方地区秸秆覆盖和地膜覆盖技术对小麦生产的影响,探索两种覆盖体系的适宜推广区域。【方法】在近40年的时间跨度中检索并筛选出165篇相关文献,将其置于荟萃分析(Meta-analysis)的框架下,通过效应分析的不同展现形式(如变化率及反应比)开展理论研究。整体采用随机效应模型,分析对比不同覆盖模式下小麦农艺指标和农田水分状况的变化情况。进而以亚组分析的形式,重点揭示覆盖增产效应对不同环境条件(海拔、降水量、气温、日照)及田间管理措施(覆盖周期、种植密度、耕作、施肥)的响应规律,对其进行函数拟合、权重分析及统计检验。并且通过皮尔逊相关性分析量化本研究涉及的各个变量之间的相关性。【结果】相较于露地栽培,秸秆和地膜覆盖分别使小麦产量显著提高了19.53%(95%CI = 0.55%—38.52%)和24.91%(95%CI = 3.18%—46.64%),并且抑制了农田蒸散。不同覆盖模式下产量构成因素对增产的贡献率亦存在一定差异,分别为有效穗数>穗粒数>千粒重(秸秆覆盖);有效穗数>千粒重>穗粒数(地膜覆盖)。其中秸秆覆盖下的穗粒数增幅较高,达5.7%(95%CI = -4.10%—15.50%);而覆膜的有效穗数和千粒重增长更显著,分别为25.2%(95%CI = 14.11%—36.29%)和6.4%(95%CI = 1.50%—11.30%)。除了具有促产优势,覆膜的生物量和水分利用效率同样比覆秸秆高出18.17%和14.39%。具体表现为在大部分气象亚区中地膜覆盖的增产率相较于秸秆覆盖高出0.89%—23.34%。同时,随着地势的下降,覆膜的增产效应相对于非覆盖呈现出增长趋势,在低海拔地区(<800 m)增产率可达34.26%。然而,塑料薄膜相对于秸秆的增产优势会随着覆盖年限的增加而逐渐缩小,在超过8年的试验中,覆盖秸秆的整体增产率反而更高。秸秆覆盖产量还受到施肥和耕作措施的影响,尤其是在免耕,不施肥以及单施磷肥这3种处理中,增产率分别达到32.68%,25.94%和21.71%。由统计学检验可知,在海拔、年均日照时数和种植密度3个亚组中,组间异质Q的检验量整体较大,说明该组内各效应量的变异程度更高。秸秆和地膜覆盖条件下,同产量相关度最高的因子分别为有效穗数(r = 0.808)和水分利用效率(r = 0.718),而影响两种覆盖体系中土壤含水量的首要因子分别为蒸散量(r = -0.859)以及水分利用效率(r = 0.856)。【结论】两种覆盖模式皆具有明显的增产效应,且地膜覆盖在低海拔、偏旱、偏寒地区更具优势;而秸秆覆盖更适合融入长期的保护性耕作体系,从而实现生产和生态的多元协调式发展。因此,因地制宜、因时制宜选择科学的覆盖方法是我国北方小麦覆盖技术取得成功的关键。
秦羽青,程宏波,柴雨葳,马建涛,李瑞,李亚伟,常磊,柴守玺. 中国北方地区小麦覆盖栽培增产效应的荟萃(Meta)分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(6): 1095-1109.
QIN YuQing,CHENG HongBo,CHAI YuWei,MA JianTao,LI Rui,LI YaWei,CHANG Lei,CHAI ShouXi. Increasing Effects of Wheat Yield Under Mulching Cultivation in Northern of China: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(6): 1095-1109.
表2
环境因素对产量影响的亚组分析"
| 变量 Variable | 亚组 Sub-group | Qtra | P-Qtra | Qter | P-Qter | CV (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 海拔 Altitude (m) | < 800 | 25.42(17.65) | <0.05(<0.05) | 79.56(53.68) | <0.01(<0.01) | 20.54(12.81) | 14.05(7.44) |
| 800-1 150 | 9.55(4.98) | <0.05(0.255) | 13.56(12.54) | 9.92(15.98) | |||
| 1 150-1 250 | 15.30(7.29) | <0.01(<0.05) | 13.05(21.65) | 26.17(13.77) | |||
| > 1 250 | 49.15(16.36) | <0.01(<0.05) | 15.45(12.25) | 7.99(4.68) | |||
| 年均降水量 Annual mean precipitation (mm) | < 450 | 7.61(4.09) | <0.05(0.296) | 15.93(33.54) | <0.05(<0.01) | 10.53(12.00) | 8.73(9.98) |
| 450-550 | 5.22(6.05) | 0.262(0.080) | 14.62(15.11) | 11.47(7.23) | |||
| 550-650 | 4.34(4.90) | 0.133(0.116) | 13.20(13.68) | 19.20(26.18) | |||
| > 650 | 2.31(5.57) | 0.523(0.122) | 20.55(9.03) | 4.99(12.22) | |||
| 年均气温 Annual mean air temperature (℃) | < 9 | 4.49(5.16) | 0.207(0.195) | 6.63(10.50) | 0.057(<0.05) | 11.64(14.74) | 8.06(12.24) |
| 9-10.5 | 6.55(1.12) | <0.05(0.551) | 10.25(15.07) | 11.64(19.70) | |||
| 10.5-12.5 | 4.22(6.85) | 0.376(<0.05) | 13.87(12.51) | 4.78(8.69) | |||
| > 12.5 | 1.25(2.27) | 0.415(0.364) | 8.32(1.99) | 19.10(15.52) | |||
| 年均日照时数 Annual mean sunshine hours (h) | < 2 200 | 43.68(52.02) | <0.05(<0.01) | 77.68(120.54) | <0.01(<0.01) | 15.36(21.60) | 10.96(14.04) |
| 2 200-2 500 | 33.98(12.84) | <0.01(<0.05) | 19.09(11.68) | 16.67(15.79) | |||
| > 2200 | 27.58(60.17) | <0.05(<0.01) | 12.25(11.87) | 17.98(24.56) |
表3
田间管理因素对产量影响的亚组分析"
| 变量 Variable | 亚组 Sub-group | Qtra | P-Qtra | Qter | P-Qter | CV (%) | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 覆盖周期 Mulching period | 1~2 | 3.80(10.35) | 0.327(<0.05) | 9.66(42.56) | 0.604(<0.01) | 15.81(17.15) | 7.62(19.06) |
| 3~4 | 5.43(18.54) | 0.092(<0.01) | 12.73(15.59) | 14.37(17.01) | |||
| 5~8 | 1.89(15.42) | 0.578(<0.05) | 8.92(13.72) | 12.61(10.26) | |||
| > 8 | 2.57(13.32) | 0.436(<0.01) | 22.97(10.54) | 15.25(3.81) | |||
| 种植密度 Planting density (×104 plants/hm2) | < 300 | 35.01(18.74) | <0.01(<0.05) | 151.40(36.15) | <0.01(<0.01) | 13.56(15.74) | 7.76(10.05) |
| 300~400 | 99.55(10.37) | <0.01(<0.05) | 20.99(22.52) | 17.81(21.00) | |||
| > 400 | 41.03(14.28) | <0.01(<0.05) | 19.40(15.17) | 19.63(23.74) | |||
| 耕作模式 Tillage pattern | 传统耕作CT | 12.84(9.35) | <0.05(<0.05) | 25.19(33.21) | <0.05(<0.01) | 10.97(10.51) | 8.51(13.62) |
| 免耕NT | 11.27(7.34) | <0.05(0.063) | 15.28(7.71) | 21.70(10.21) | |||
| 旋耕RT | 6.55(1.90) | 0.075(0.449) | 14.32(13.94) | 14.04(5.11) | |||
| 深松耕ST | 14.43(8.54) | <0.01(<0.05) | 11.56(8.57) | 16.60(10.21) | |||
| 施肥方式 Fertilization measure | 不施肥NF | 11.35(2.16) | <0.05(0.389) | 50.66(14.20) | <0.01(<0.05) | 18.55(13.06) | 10.99(4.71) |
| 单施氮肥AN | 15.23(2.26) | <0.01(0.397) | 12.80(14.49) | 3.93(5.76) | |||
| 单施磷肥AP | 41.31(2.48) | <0.01(0.303) | 13.15(20.92) | 3.93(5.76) | |||
| 单施有机肥AO | 5.24(6.55) | 0.856(0.527) | 14.06(14.28) | 9.42(7.59) | |||
| 单施无机肥AI | 18.80(5.54) | <0.01(<0.05) | 10.83(9.54) | 4.97(7.07) | |||
| 有机无机配施OIF | 5.17(3.11) | 0.127(0.278) | 11.98(15.77) | 15.45(20.42) |
表4
覆盖模式下小麦主要农艺指标及农田水分状况的相关性分析"
| 产量 Yield | 生物产量 Biomass | 有效穗数Effective spike number | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 蒸散量 ET | 水分利用效率 WUE | 土壤含水量 Soil water content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 产量 Yield | 1 | |||||||
| 生物产量 Biomass | 0.686** 0.443* | 1 | ||||||
| 有效穗数 Effective spike number | 0.808** 0.677** | 0.201 0.165 | 1 | |||||
| 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 0.796** 0.364 | 0.548* 0.501* | -0.537* -0.887** | 1 | ||||
| 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 0.549* 0.586* | 0.086 0.340 | -0.563* 0.760* | -0.532* -0.391 | 1 | |||
| 蒸散量 ET | -0.064 -0.054 | -0.112 -0.438** | -0.368 0.845** | 0.336 0.224 | -0.517* -0.758** | 1 | ||
| 水分利用效率 WUE | 0.312 0.718** | 0.195 0.667** | 0.224 0.167 | 0.428 0.875** | 0.258 0.490* | -0.561* -0.913** | 1 | |
| 土壤含水量 Soil water content | 0.473* 0.492* | 0.632* 0.145 | 0.460* 0.259 | 0.227 0.456* | 0.524* 0.411 | -0.859** -0.783** | 0.414 0.856** | 1 |
| [1] | WANG C R, TIAN X H, LI S X. Effects of plastic sheet-mulching on ridge for rainwater-harvesting cultivation on WUE and yield of winter wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004,37(2):208-214. |
| [2] |
RAMAKRISHNA A, TAM H M, WANI S P, LONG T D. Effect of mulch on soil temperature, moisture, weed infestation and yield of groundnut in northern Vietnam. Field Crops Research, 2006,95(2/3):115-125.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.030 |
| [3] |
CHAKRABORTY D, NAGARAJAN S, AGGARWAL P, GUPTA V K, TOMAR R K, GARG R N, SAHOO R N, SARKAR A, CHOPRA U K, SARMA K S, KALRA N. Effect of mulching on soil and plant water status, and the growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management, 2008,95(12):1323-1334.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.06.001 |
| [4] |
ZRIBI W, ARAGÜÉS R, MEDINA E, FACI J M. Efficiency of inorganic and organic mulching materials for soil evaporation control. Soil and Tillage Research, 2015,148:40-45.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2014.12.003 |
| [5] |
LIN W, LIU W Z, XUE Q W. Spring maize yield, soil water use and water use effciency under plastic film and straw mulches in the Loess Plateau. Scientific Reports, 2016,6:38995.
doi: 10.1038/srep38995 |
| [6] |
REN A T, ZHOU R, MO F, LIU S T, LI J Y, CHEN Y L, ZHAO L, XIONG Y C. Soil water balance dynamics under plastic mulching in dryland rainfed agroecosystem across the Loess Plateau. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2021,312:107354.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107354 |
| [7] |
HE G, WANG Z H, LI F C, DAI J, LI Q, XUE C, CAO H B, WANG S, MALHI S S. Soil water storage and winter wheat productivity affected by soil surface management and precipitation in dryland of the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 2016,171:1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.005 |
| [8] |
FANG H, LI Y N, GU X B, LI Y P, CHEN P P. Can ridge-furrow with film and straw mulching improve wheat-maize system productivity and maintain soil fertility on the Loess Plateau of China? Agricultural Water Management, 2021,246:106686.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106686 |
| [9] |
FU W, FAN J, HAO M D, HU J S, WANG H. Evaluating the effects of plastic film mulching patterns on cultivation of winter wheat in a dryland cropping system on the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 2021,244:106550.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106550 |
| [10] | GAN Y T, SIDDIQUE K, TURNER N C, LI X G, NIU J Y, YANG C, LIU L P, CHAI Q. Ridge-furrow mulching systems—an innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid rain-fed environments. Advances in Agronomy, 2013,118:429-476. |
| [11] |
ZHOU L M, ZHANG F, LIU C A. Improved yield by harvesting water with ridges and subgrooves using buried and surface plastic mulchs in a semiarid area of China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2015,150:21-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.01.006 |
| [12] |
LI C J, WEN X X, WAN X J, LIU Y, HAN J, LIAO Y C, WU W. Towards the highly effective use of precipitation by ridge-furrow with plastic film mulching instead of relying on irrigation resources in a dry semi-humid area. Field Crops Research, 2016,188:62-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.01.013 |
| [13] |
LUO L C, WANG Z H, HUANG M, HUI X L, WANG S, ZHAO Y, HE H X, ZHANG X, DIAO C P, CAO H B, MA Q X, LIU J S. Plastic film mulch increased winter wheat grain yield but reduced its protein content in dryland of northwest China. Field Crops Research, 2018,218:69-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.005 |
| [14] |
MO F, WANG J Y, XIONG Y C, NGULUU S N, LI F M. Ridge-furrow mulching system in semiarid Kenya: A promising solution to improve soil water availability and maize productivity. European Journal of Agronomy, 2016,80:124-136.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.07.005 |
| [15] |
QIN X L, LI Y Z, HAN Y L, HU Y C, LI Y J, WEN X X, LIAO Y C, SIDDIQUE-KADAMBOT H M. Ridge-furrow mulching with black plastic film improves maize yield more than white plastic film in dry areas with adequate accumulated temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018,262:206-214.
doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.07.018 |
| [16] |
SUBRAHMANIYAN K, VEERAMANI P, HARISUDAN C. Heat accumulation and soil properties as affected by transparent plastic mulch in Blackgram (Vigna mungo) doubled cropped with Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in sequence under rainfed conditions in Tamil Nadu, India. Field Crops Research, 2018,219:43-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.024 |
| [17] |
FAN Y Q, DING R S, KANG S Z, HAO X M, DU T S, TONG L, LI S. Plastic mulch decreases available energy and evapotranspiration and improves yield and water use efficiency in an irrigated maize cropland. Agricultural Water Manage, 2017,179:122-231.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.08.019 |
| [18] | 董孔军, 杨天育, 何继红, 任瑞玉, 张磊. 西北旱作区不同地膜覆盖种植方式对谷子生长发育的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013,31(1):37-40. |
| DONG K J, YANG T Y, HE J H, REN R Y, ZHANG L. Effects of different plastic film mulching planting methods on millet growth and development in arid areas of Northwest China. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2013,31(1):37-40. (in Chinese) | |
| [19] |
ZHAO H B, LIU J F, CHEN X W, WANG Z H. Straw mulch as an alternative to plastic film mulch: Positive evidence from dryland wheat production on the Loess Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,676:782-791.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.320 |
| [20] |
POWLSON D S, STIRLING C M, JAT M L, GERARD B G, PALM C A, SANCHEZ P A, CASSMAN K G. Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 2014,4(8):678-683.
doi: 10.1038/nclimate2292 |
| [21] |
KADER M A, SENGE M, MOJID M A, ITO K. Recent advances in mulching materials and methods for modifying soil environment. Soil and Tillage Research, 2017,168:155-166.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.01.001 |
| [22] |
ZHANG S L, LI P R, YANG X Y, WANG Z H, CHEN X P. Effects of tillage and plastic mulch on soil water, growth and yield of spring-sown maize. Soil and Tillage Research, 2011,112(1):92-97.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2010.11.006 |
| [23] |
AULAKH M S, WALTERS D T, DORAN J W, FRANCIS D D, MOSLER A R. Crop residue type and placement effects on denitrification and mineralization. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1991,55(4):1020-1025.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500040022x |
| [24] |
KLADIVKO E J. Tillage systems and soil ecology. Soil and Tillage Research, 2001,61(1/2):61-76.
doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00179-9 |
| [25] |
LAFITTE H R, ISMAIL A, BENNETT J. Abiotic stress tolerance in rice for Asia: Progress and the future. Crop Science, 2004,26:1-17.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600010001x |
| [26] |
CHEN Q Y, LIU Z J, ZHOU J B, XU X P, ZHU Y J. Long-term straw mulching with nitrogen fertilization increases nutrient and microbial determinants of soil quality in a maize-wheat rotation on China's Loess Plateau. Science of The Total Environment, 2021,775(25):145930.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145930 |
| [27] |
WANG L F, SHANGGUAN Z P. Water-use efficiency of dryland wheat in response to mulching and tillage practices on the Loess Plateau. Scientific Reports, 2015,5:12225.
doi: 10.1038/srep12225 |
| [28] |
LI S X, WANG Z H, LI S Q, GAO Y J, TIAN X H. Effect of plastic sheet mulch, wheat straw mulch, and maize growth on water loss by evaporation in dryland areas of China. Agricultural Water Management, 2013,116(2):39-49.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.004 |
| [29] |
ZHANG M M, ZHAO G X, LI Y Z, WANG Q, DANG P F, QIN X L, ZOU Y F, CHEN Y L, SIDDIQUE H M. Straw incorporation with ridge-furrow plastic film mulch alters soil fungal community and increases maize yield in a semiarid region of China. Applied Soil Ecology, 2021,167:104038.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104038 |
| [30] |
MA Z Z, ZHANG X C, ZHENG B Y, YUE S C, ZHANG X C, ZHAI B N, WANG Z H, ZHENG W, LI Z Y, ZAMANIAN K, RAZAVI B S. Effects of plastic and straw mulching on soil microbial P limitations in maize fields: Dependency on soil organic carbon demonstrated by ecoenzymatic stoichiometry. Geoderma, 2021,388(15):114928.
doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.114928 |
| [31] |
GUREVITCH J, KORICHEVA J, NAKAGAWA S, STEWART G. Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature, 2018,555(7695):175-182.
doi: 10.1038/nature25753 |
| [32] |
SPINELI L M, PANDIS N. Fixed-effect versus random-effects model in meta-regression analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2020,158(5):770-772.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.07.016 |
| [33] |
ZHANG Y Q, WANG J D, GONG S H, XU D, MO Y, ZHANG B Z. Straw mulching improves soil water content, increases flag leaf photosynthetic parameters and maintaines the yield of winter wheat with different irrigation amounts. Agricultural Water Management, 2021,249(1):106809.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106809 |
| [34] |
WANG H M, ZHENG J, FAN J L, ZHANG F C, HUANG C H. Grain yield and greenhouse gas emissions from maize and wheat fields under plastic film and straw mulching: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 2021,270:108210.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108210 |
| [35] |
HU Y J, MA P H, WU S F, SUN B H, FENG H, PAN X L, ZHANG B B, CHEN G J, DUAN C X, LEI Q, SIDDIQUE H M, LIU B Y. Spatial-temporal distribution of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) roots and water use efficiency under ridge-furrow dual mulching. Agricultural Water Management, 2020,240:106301.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106301 |
| [36] |
YU Y Y, TURNER N C, GONG Y H, LI F M, FANG C, GE L J, YE J S. Benefits and limitations to straw- and plastic-film mulch on maize yield and water use efficiency: A meta-analysis across hydrothermal gradients. European Journal of Agronomy, 2018,99:138-147.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.07.005 |
| [37] |
QIN W, HU C S, OENEMA O. Soil mulching significantly enhances yields and water and nitrogen use efficiencies of maize and wheat: A meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 2015,5:16210.
doi: 10.1038/srep16210 |
| [38] |
GUPTA N, HUMPHREYS E, EBERBACH P L, SINGH B, YADAV S, KUKAL S S. Effects of tillage and mulch on soil evaporation in a dry seeded rice-wheat cropping system. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021,209:104976.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.104976 |
| [39] | 毛安然, 赵护兵, 杨慧敏, 王涛, 陈秀文, 梁文娟. 不同覆盖时期和覆盖方式对旱地冬小麦经济和环境效应的影响. 中国农业科学, 2021,54(3):608-618. |
| MAO A R, ZHAO H B, YANG H M, WANG T, CHEN X W, LIANG W J. Effects of different mulching periods and mulching practices on economic return and environment. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021,54(3):608-618. (in Chinese) | |
| [40] |
MO F, YU K L, CROWTHER T W, WANG J Y, ZHAO H, XIONG Y C, LIAO Y C. How plastic mulching affects net primary productivity, soil C fluxes and organic carbon balance in dry agroecosystems in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,263:121470.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121470 |
| [41] |
LIU Y, SUI Y W, GU D D, WEN X X, CHEN Y, LI C J, LIAO Y C. Effects of conservation tillage on grain filling and hormonal changes in wheat under simulated rainfall conditions. Field Crops Research, 2013,144:43-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.01.009 |
| [42] | 张丹, 刘宏斌, 马忠明, 唐文雪, 魏焘, 杨虎德, 李俊改, 王洪媛. 残膜对农田土壤养分含量及微生物特征的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(2):310-319. |
| ZHANG D, LIU H B, MA Z M, TANG W X, WEI T, YANG H D, LI J G, WANG H Y. Effect of residual plastic film on soil nutrient contents and microbial characteristics in the farmland. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017,50(2):310-319. (in Chinese) | |
| [43] | 张林森, 刘富庭, 张永旺, 李雪薇, 李丙智, 胥生荣, 谷洁, 韩明玉. 不同覆盖方式对黄土高原地区苹果园土壤有机碳组分及微生物的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(15):3180-3190. |
| ZHANG L S, LIU F T, ZHANG Y W, LI X W, LI B Z, XU S R, GU J, HAN M Y. Effects of different mulching on soil organic carbon fractions and soil microbial community of apple orchard in Loess Plateau. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013,46(15):3180-3190. (in Chinese) | |
| [44] | 高洪军, 彭畅, 张秀芝, 李强, 朱平, 王立春. 秸秆还田量对黑土区土壤及团聚体有机碳变化特征和固碳效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020,53(22):4613-4622. |
| GAO H J, PENG C, ZHANG X Z, LI Q, ZHU P, WANG L C. Effects of corn straw returning amounts on carbon sequestration efficiency and organic carbon change of soil and aggregate in the black soil area. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020,53(22):4613-4622. (in Chinese) | |
| [45] |
YIN W, YU A Z, GUO Y, ET AL WANG Y F, ZHAO C, FAN Z L, HU F L, CHAI Q. Straw retention and plastic mulching enhance water use via synergistic regulation of water competition and compensation in wheat-maize intercropping systems. Field Crops Research, 2018,229:78-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.10.003 |
| [46] |
LI Y Z, SONG D P, DANG P F, WEI L N, QIN X L, SIDDIQUE H M. Combined ditch buried straw return technology in a ridge-furrow plastic film mulch system: Implications for crop yield and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020,199:104596.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104596 |
| [47] |
LI Q, LI H B, ZHANG L, ZHANG S Q, GHEN Y L. Mulching improves yield and water-use efficiency of potato cropping in China: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 2018,221:50-60.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.017 |
| [48] |
WANG N J, DING D Y, MALONE R W, CHEN H X, WEI Y S, ZHANG T B, LUO X Q, LI C, CHU X S, FENG H. When does plastic-film mulching yield more for dryland maize in the Loess Plateau of China? A meta-analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 2020,240:106290.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106290 |
| [49] |
HU Y J, MA P H, ZHANG B B, HILL R L, WU S F, DONG Q G, CHEN G J. Exploring optimal soil mulching for the wheat-maize cropping system in sub-humid drought-prone regions in China. Agricultural Water Management, 2019,219:59-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.004 |
| [50] |
DAI Z J, HU J S, FAN J, FU W, WANG H, HAO M D. No-tillage with mulching improves maize yield in dryland farming through regulating soil temperature, water and nitrate-N. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2021,309:107288.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107288 |
| [51] |
LI N, ZHOU C J, SUN X, JING J Y, TIAN X X, WANG L Q. Effects of ridge tillage and mulching on water availability, grain yield, and water use efficiency in rain-fed winter wheat under different rainfall and nitrogen conditions. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018,179:86-95.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2018.01.003 |
| [52] |
LUO C L, ZHANG X F, DUAN H X, MBURU D M, KAVAGI L, NASEER M, DAI R Z, NYENDE A B, BATOOL A, XIONG Y C. Allometric relationship and yield formation in response to planting density under ridge-furrow plastic mulching in rainfed wheat. Field Crops Research, 2020,251:107785.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107785 |
| [53] |
STEINMETZ Z, WOLLMANN C, SCHAEFER M, BUCHMANN C, DAVID J, TRÖGER J, MUÑOZ K, FRÖR O, SCHAUMANN G E. Plastic mulching in agriculture. Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation? Science of the Total Environment, 2016,550:690-705.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.153 |
| [54] |
ZHANG H Y, HOBBIE E A, FENG P Y, ZHOU Z X, NIU L A, DUAN W K, HAO J M, HU K L. Responses of soil organic carbon and crop yields to 33-year mineral fertilizer and straw additions under different tillage systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021,209(1):104943.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.104943 |
| [1] | 彭廷燊, 陆久焱, 吴美林, 严雨欣, 刘宏周, 南文斌, 秦小健, 李明, 龚俊义, 梁永书. 多年生水稻黄糯2号和长白7号产量相关性状的QTL分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1361-1379. |
| [2] | 朱琦, 贾振鹏, Tahir SHAH, 徐晨晟, 李芷琦, 吕会帅, 朱鹏超, 韦小敏, 黄冬琳, 孙艳妮, 曹卫东, 高亚军, 王朝辉, 张达斌. 绿肥配施增效产品降低旱地麦田温室气体排放及碳足迹[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1507-1522. |
| [3] | 王玉萍, 符质, 孙佳莹, 穆晓萌, 刘慧淋, 郭进云, 宋文菁, 侯雷平, 赵海亮. 苗期施用褪黑素对番茄短期低温胁迫的缓解作用与应用效果评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(7): 1523-1535. |
| [4] | 叶美金, 吴雷, Lohani Md Nahibuzzaman, 尹丽, 胡欣荣, 刘亚西, 蒋云峰, 陈国跃, 蒲至恩, 李阳, 李婷, 邹亚亚, 吴佳怡, 马建. 基于GWAS的中国地方小麦成熟胚大小位点的鉴定及其遗传效应解析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1157-1171. |
| [5] | 王佳诺, 陈桂平, 李盼, 王丽萍, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文, 赵连豪. 免耕地膜两年覆盖提高绿洲灌区玉米产量的灌浆期光合生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1189-1202. |
| [6] | 周新杰, 任昊, 陈应龙, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 过氧化钙对渍涝农田夏玉米根系形态及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1203-1216. |
| [7] | 何继航, 张擎, 吕相月, 薛吉全, 徐淑兔, 刘建超. 不同保绿型玉米杂交种氮效率评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(6): 1217-1230. |
| [8] | 李文虎, 礼海风, 杜宇鹏, 丁玉兰, 罗一诺, 李宇珂, 佘文婷, 张丰, 滕宇, 张思琦, 黄翠, 李小涵, 刘金山, 王朝辉. 小麦锌吸收转移对土施锌肥响应的区域差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 1034-1047. |
| [9] | 焦文娟, 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 白斌, 李剑峰, 程宇坤. 155份春小麦品种(系)条锈病抗性评价与抗病基因分子检测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(5): 937-950. |
| [10] | 温玉斌, 白珊珊, 蔡泽江, 孙楠, 徐明岗. 有机物料对土壤微生物量的影响及其酸度调节机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 834-849. |
| [11] | 郝琨, 陈洪德, 张威, 钟韵, 党美荣, 朱士江, 黄志坤, 金英. 基于柑橘产量、品质及水氮利用的涌泉根灌水氮综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 862-873. |
| [12] | 崔士友, 陈澎军, 缪源卿, 韩继军, 沈俊明. EMS诱变抗草甘膦小麦新种质的创制与大田评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 723-733. |
| [13] | 郭富城, 唐海江, 郝馨怡, 马国林, 杨九菊, 黄霖锋, 田蕾, 王彬, 罗成科. 不同灌溉方式对宁夏盐渍化土壤水盐运移、水稻产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 750-764. |
| [14] | 钱瑾, 李映雪, 吴芳, 邹晓晨. 集成光谱降维的冬小麦叶片磷含量估算[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 781-792. |
| [15] | 孔媛, 崔沙沙, 李美, 李健, 杨思雨, 房锋, 刘帅帅, 刘明平, 曾艳, 高兴祥, 柏连阳. 黄淮海冬小麦田多花黑麦草等5种禾本科杂草时空分布变化规律[J]. 中国农业科学, 2026, 59(4): 807-823. |
|
||